Recognition: no theorem link
Precision measurement of CP violation and branching fractions in B^{pm} to K⁰_{S} h^{pm} (h = π, K) decays and search for the rare decay B_c^{pm} to K⁰_{S} K^{pm}
Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 00:00 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
LHCb reports the most precise CP asymmetry measurements for B± to K0S π± and B± to K0S K± decays plus a branching ratio of 0.055 and an upper limit on the rare Bc decay.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Using LHCb data corresponding to 5.4 fb^{-1} at 13 TeV, the CP asymmetries are determined to be A^CP(B± → K0S π±) = -0.028 ± 0.009 ± 0.009 and A^CP(B± → K0S K±) = 0.118 ± 0.062 ± 0.031, while the branching fraction ratio B(B± → K0S K±)/B(B± → K0S π±) = 0.055 ± 0.004 ± 0.002. No significant signal is observed for Bc± → K0S K±, and the upper limit on the product of the branching fraction ratio B(Bc± → K0S K±)/B(B± → K0S π±) and the fragmentation fraction ratio fc/fu is set to 0.015 (0.016) at 90% (95%) confidence level.
What carries the argument
Yield extraction from invariant-mass fits to reconstructed B± → K0S h± candidates, with efficiencies and backgrounds modeled from simulation and control samples to determine asymmetries and ratios.
If this is right
- The near-zero asymmetry in the pion mode can be combined with other measurements to bound penguin contributions or new physics phases in b to s transitions.
- The branching ratio of 0.055 quantifies the relative suppression of the strangeness-changing mode and can be compared directly to theoretical predictions.
- The upper limit on the Bc decay constrains models of Bc production and decay and serves as a reference for searches in future LHC runs.
- These values update the world averages and improve the precision of global fits to CKM parameters and flavor observables.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The positive kaon-mode asymmetry suggests a measurable contribution from penguin amplitudes that could be further tested with larger samples.
- Independent determinations of the fragmentation fraction fc/fu would allow conversion of the reported product limit into a pure branching-fraction bound.
- The results demonstrate that current LHCb data already reach the precision where small Standard Model deviations or new physics effects could become visible in these channels.
- Similar analysis techniques could be applied to other rare Bc decays to map out the landscape of heavy-flavor transitions.
Load-bearing premise
The analysis assumes that detector efficiencies, acceptances, and background shapes are accurately modeled by simulation and control samples.
What would settle it
A future analysis with substantially larger data that extracts a pion-mode CP asymmetry differing from -0.028 by more than 3 standard deviations combined would falsify the current central value.
Figures
read the original abstract
The decay $B^{\pm} \to K^0_{\mathrm{S}} \pi^{\pm}$, with a $CP$ asymmetry expected to be close to zero in the Standard Model, is theoretically clean and sensitive to potential new physics. An analysis of the decays $B^{\pm} \to K^0_{\mathrm{S}} \pi^{\pm}$ and $B^{\pm} \to K^0_{\mathrm{S}} K^{\pm}$ is performed using proton-proton collision data collected by the LHCb experiment at a center-of-mass energy of $13\,\mathrm{TeV}$, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of $5.4\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$. The \CP asymmetries are determined to be ${\cal A}^{CP}(B^{\pm} \to K^0_{\mathrm{S}} \pi^{\pm})=-0.028\pm 0.009\pm 0.009$ and ${\cal A}^{CP}(B^{\pm} \to K^0_{\mathrm{S}} K^{\pm})=0.118\pm 0.062 \pm 0.031$, and the branching fraction ratio is measured to be ${\cal B}(B^{\pm} \to K^0_{\mathrm{S}} K^{\pm})/{\cal B}(B^{\pm} \to K^0_{\mathrm{S}} \pi^{\pm})=0.055\pm 0.004 \pm 0.002$, where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second are systematic. These results are the most precise measurements of these quantities to date. A search for the rare decay $B_c^{\pm} \to K^0_{\mathrm{S}} K^{\pm}$ is also performed. No significant signal is observed, and the upper limit on the product of the branching fraction ratio ${\cal B}(B_c^{\pm} \to K^0_{\mathrm{S}} K^{\pm})/{\cal B}(B^{\pm} \to K^0_{\mathrm{S}} \pi^{\pm})$ and the fragmentation-fraction ratio $f_c/f_u$ is set to be 0.015 (0.016) at the 90\% (95\%) confidence level.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript reports precision measurements of CP asymmetries in B± → K0S π± and B± → K0S K± decays, the branching-fraction ratio between these modes, and an upper limit on the rare Bc± → K0S K± decay, using 5.4 fb^{-1} of LHCb pp collision data at √s = 13 TeV. The central results are A^CP(B± → K0S π±) = −0.028 ± 0.009 ± 0.009, A^CP(B± → K0S K±) = 0.118 ± 0.062 ± 0.031, B(B± → K0S K±)/B(B± → K0S π±) = 0.055 ± 0.004 ± 0.002, and an upper limit of 0.015 (0.016) at 90 % (95 %) CL on the product of the Bc branching-fraction ratio and fc/fu.
Significance. If the results hold, they constitute the most precise determinations of these CP asymmetries and the branching-fraction ratio to date, providing a clean test of the Standard Model expectation that A^CP(B± → K0S π±) is near zero and supplying improved input for fragmentation-fraction studies. The upper limit on the rare Bc decay adds a useful constraint on Bc production and decay rates.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the results are 'the most precise measurements to date' would be strengthened by a brief quantitative comparison with the previous world averages or LHCb results in the text or a dedicated table.
- [Results] The treatment of the fragmentation fraction fc/fu in the Bc upper-limit calculation is only summarized; a short dedicated paragraph or appendix detailing the adopted value and its uncertainty would improve clarity.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the positive review and the recommendation to accept the manuscript. The referee's summary accurately captures the main results and their significance for Standard Model tests and fragmentation studies.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; results extracted from data fits with standard efficiency corrections
full rationale
The paper reports direct measurements of CP asymmetries and branching-fraction ratios extracted from fits to invariant-mass distributions in 5.4 fb^{-1} of LHCb data. No derivation reduces by construction to previously fitted parameters, self-defined quantities, or load-bearing self-citations whose validity depends on the present result. Efficiency modeling, background shapes, and the fc/fu fragmentation factor are taken from simulation and control samples whose assumptions are independent of the target observables; the quoted uncertainties already fold in the dominant systematics. This is a standard experimental extraction with no self-definitional, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or uniqueness-theorem circularity. Minor self-citations to prior LHCb methodology papers exist but are not load-bearing for the central claims.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Standard Model predicts CP asymmetry close to zero in B± → K0S π±
- domain assumption LHCb detector efficiencies and background shapes are correctly modeled
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Resolving the $B \to K \pi$ puzzle by Glauber-gluon effects
X. Liu, H.-n. Li, and Z.-J. Xiao,Resolving the B→Kπ puzzle by Glauber-gluon effects, Phys. Rev.D93(2016) 014024,arXiv:1510.05910
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[2]
Chaiet al.,Charmless two-body B meson decays in the perturbative QCD factor- ization approach, Chin
J. Chaiet al.,Charmless two-body B meson decays in the perturbative QCD factor- ization approach, Chin. Phys.C46(2022) 123103,arXiv:2207.04190
-
[3]
H.-n. Li, S. Mishima, and A. I. Sanda,Resolution to the B→πK puzzle, Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 114005,arXiv:hep-ph/0508041
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[4]
S. L¨ u and M.-Z. Yang,Possible solution of the puzzle for the branching ratio and C P violation in B→ππ decays with a modified perturbative QCD approach, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 013004,arXiv:2211.10917
-
[5]
Revisiting $K\pi$ puzzle in the pQCD factorization approach
W. Baiet al.,Revisiting the Kπ puzzle in the pQCD factorization approach, Chin. Phys.C38(2014) 033101,arXiv:1305.6103
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
-
[6]
The B ---> {\pi} K puzzle and the Bulk Randall-Sundurm model
S. Chang, C. S. Kim, and J. Song,The B→πK puzzle and the bulk Randall–Sundrum model, Phys. Lett.B696(2011) 367,arXiv:1006.1203
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[7]
Is There Still a B -> pi K Puzzle?
S. Baek and D. London,Is there still a B→πK puzzle?, Phys. Lett.B653(2007) 249,arXiv:hep-ph/0701181
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
-
[8]
Y.-D. Yang, R. Wang, and G. R. Lu,Puzzles in B→ππ, πK decays: Possible implications for R-parity violating supersymmetry, Phys. Rev.D73(2006) 015003, arXiv:hep-ph/0509273
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
-
[9]
Implication of the B -> rho rho data on the B -> pi pi puzzle
H.-n. Li and S. Mishima,Implication of the B→ρρ data on the B→ππ puzzle, Phys. Rev.D73(2006) 114014,arXiv:hep-ph/0602214
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
-
[10]
R. Fleischer, R. Jaarsma, and K. K. Vos,Zooming into CP violation in B (s)→hh decays, JHEP02(2023) 081,arXiv:2211.08346
-
[11]
Navaset al.,Review of particle physics, Phys
Particle Data Group, S. Navaset al.,Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev.D110 (2024) 030001
work page 2024
-
[12]
QCD Factorization in B -> pi K, pi pi Decays and Extraction of Wolfenstein Parameters
M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda,QCD factorization in B→πK, ππ Decays and Extraction of Wolfenstein Parameters, Nucl. Phys.B606 (2001) 245,arXiv:hep-ph/0104110
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
-
[13]
QCD factorization for B->PP and B->PV decays
M. Beneke and M. Neubert,QCD factorization for B → PP and B → PV decays, Nucl. Phys.B675(2003) 333,arXiv:hep-ph/0308039
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
-
[14]
A precise sum rule among four B -> Kpi CP asymmetries
M. Gronau,A precise sum rule among four B→Kπ CP asymmetries, Phys. Lett. B627(2005) 82,arXiv:hep-ph/0508047
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[15]
Combining CP Asymmetries in $B \to K \pi$ Decays
M. Gronau and J. L. Rosner,Combining C P asymmetries in B→Kπ decays, Phys. Rev.D59(1999) 113002,arXiv:hep-ph/9809384
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
-
[16]
G. Bell, M. Beneke, T. Huber, and X.-Q. Li,Two-loop current–current operator contribution to the non-leptonic QCD penguin amplitude, Phys. Lett.B750(2015) 348,arXiv:1507.03700. 11
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
- [17]
-
[18]
Belle II collaboration, I. Adachiet al.,Measurement of branching fractions and direct CP asymmetries for B→K π and B→ ππ decays at Belle II, Phys. Rev.D109(2024) 012001,arXiv:2310.06381
-
[19]
Revisiting Charmless Hadronic B_{u,d} Decays in QCD Factorization
H.-Y. Cheng and C.-K. Chua,Revisiting charmless hadronic Bu,d decays in QCD factorization, Phys. Rev.D80(2009) 114008,arXiv:0909.5229
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
-
[20]
Updating B --> PP, VP decays in the framework of flavor symmetry
H.-Y. Cheng, C.-W. Chiang, and A.-L. Kuo,Updating B→P P, V P decays in the framework of flavor symmetry, Phys. Rev.D91(2015) 014011,arXiv:1409.5026
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[21]
Observation of B+ --> K0bar K+ and B0 --> K0 K0bar
BaBar collaboration, B. Aubertet al.,Observation of B+ → ¯K 0K + and B0 →K 0 ¯K 0, Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 171805,arXiv:hep-ex/0608036
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
-
[22]
Belle collaboration, Y.-T. Duhet al.,Measurements of branching fractions and direct C P asymmetries for B→Kπ , B→ππ and B→KK decays, Phys. Rev.D87 (2013) 031103,arXiv:1210.1348
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
-
[23]
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,Branching fraction and C P asymmetry of the de- cays B+ →K 0 Sπ+ and B+ →K 0 SK +, Phys. Lett.B726(2013) 646, arXiv:1308.1277
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
-
[24]
LHCb collaboration, A. A. Alves Jr.et al.,The LHCb detector at the LHC, JINST3 (2008) S08005
work page 2008
-
[25]
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,LHCb detector performance, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A30(2015) 1530022,arXiv:1412.6352
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
-
[26]
Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator
R. Aaijet al.,Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator, JINST9(2014) P09007, arXiv:1405.7808
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
-
[27]
Improved performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker in LHC Run 2
P. d’Argentet al.,Improved performance of the LHCb Outer Tracker in LHC Run 2, JINST12(2017) P11016,arXiv:1708.00819
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
-
[28]
Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC
M. Adinolfiet al.,Performance of the LHCb RICH detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J.C73(2013) 2431,arXiv:1211.6759
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
-
[29]
The LHCb Trigger and its Performance in 2011
R. Aaijet al.,The LHCb trigger and its performance in 2011, JINST8(2013) P04022, arXiv:1211.3055
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[30]
A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1
T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178(2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820; T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands,PYTHIA 6.4 physics and manual, JHEP05(2006) 026, arXiv:hep-ph/0603175
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008
-
[31]
I. Belyaevet al.,Handling of the generation of primary events in Gauss, the LHCb simulation framework, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.331(2011) 032047
work page 2011
-
[32]
D. J. Lange,The EvtGen particle decay simulation package, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A462(2001) 152. 12
work page 2001
-
[33]
PHOTOS Interface in C++; Technical and Physics Documentation
N. Davidson, T. Przedzinski, and Z. Was,PHOTOS interface in C++: Technical and physics documentation, Comp. Phys. Comm.199(2016) 86,arXiv:1011.0937
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
-
[34]
Allisonet al.,Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans
Geant4 collaboration, J. Allisonet al.,Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.53(2006) 270; Geant4 collaboration, S. Agostinelliet al.,Geant4: A simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A506(2003) 250
work page 2006
-
[35]
Clemencicet al.,The LHCb simulation application, Gauss: Design, evolution and experience, J
M. Clemencicet al.,The LHCb simulation application, Gauss: Design, evolution and experience, J. Phys. Conf. Ser.331(2011) 032023
work page 2011
-
[36]
Y. Freund and R. E. Schapire,A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting, J. Comput. Syst. Sci.55(1997) 119
work page 1997
-
[37]
L. Breiman, J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone,Classification and regression trees, Wadsworth international group, Belmont, California, USA, 1984
work page 1984
-
[38]
H. Voss, A. Hoecker, J. Stelzer, and F. Tegenfeldt,TMVA - Toolkit for Multi- variate Data Analysis with ROOT, PoSACAT(2007) 040; A. Hoeckeret al., TMVA 4 — Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis with ROOT. Users Guide., arXiv:physics/0703039
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
-
[39]
W. D. Hulsbergen,Decay chain fitting with a Kalman filter, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A552(2005) 566,arXiv:physics/0503191
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[40]
sPlot: a statistical tool to unfold data distributions
M. Pivk and F. R. Le Diberder,sPlot: A statistical tool to unfold data distributions, Nucl. Instrum. Meth.A555(2005) 356,arXiv:physics/0402083
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
-
[41]
T. Skwarnicki,A study of the radiative cascade transitions between the Upsilon-prime and Upsilon resonances, PhD thesis, Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow, 1986, DESY-F31-86-02
work page 1986
-
[42]
Albrechtet al.,Search for hadronic b→u decays, Phys
ARGUS collaboration, H. Albrechtet al.,Search for hadronic b→u decays, Phys. Lett.B241(1990) 278
work page 1990
-
[43]
A. Daviset al.,Measurement of the instrumental asymmetry for K −π+-pairs at LHCb in Run 2, LHCb-PUB-2018-004, 2018
work page 2018
-
[44]
CP Violation in \tau ->\nu\pi K_S and D->\pi K_S: The Importance of K_S-K_L Interference
Y. Grossman and Y. Nir, C P violation in τ ± →π ±K 0 Sν and D± →π ±K 0 S: the importance ofK S −K L interference, JHEP04(2012) 002,arXiv:1110.3790
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
-
[45]
B. R. Ko, E. Won, B. Golob, and P. Pakhlov,Effect of nuclear interactions of neutral kaons onCPasymmetry measurements, Phys. Rev.D84(2011) 111501
work page 2011
-
[46]
Sensitivity of searches for new signals and its optimization
G. Punzi,Sensitivity of searches for new signals and its optimization, eConfC030908 (2003) MODT002,arXiv:physics/0308063
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
-
[47]
Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics
G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells,Asymptotic formulae for likelihood- based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J.C71(2011) 1554,arXiv:1007.1727
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
-
[48]
Schott,RooStats for searches, inPHYSTAT 2011, (Geneva), 199–208, CERN, 2011,arXiv:1203.1547
RooStats team collaboration, G. Schott,RooStats for searches, inPHYSTAT 2011, (Geneva), 199–208, CERN, 2011,arXiv:1203.1547. 13
-
[49]
De Cianet al.,Measurement of the track finding efficiency, LHCb-PUB-2011-025, 2012
M. De Cianet al.,Measurement of the track finding efficiency, LHCb-PUB-2011-025, 2012
work page 2011
-
[50]
M. Burgos Marcos, M. Reboud, and K. K. Vos,Detailed SU (3)flavour symmetry analysis of charmless two-body B-meson decays including factorizable corrections, arXiv:2504.05209
-
[51]
Aaijet al.,The LHCb Upgrade I, JINST19(2024) P05065, arXiv:2305.10515
LHCb collaboration, R. Aaijet al.,The LHCb Upgrade I, JINST19(2024) P05065, arXiv:2305.10515. 14 LHCb collaboration R. Aaij38 , A.S.W. Abdelmotteleb 58 , C. Abellan Beteta 52 , F. Abudin´ en58 , T. Ackernley62 , A. A. Adefisoye 70 , B. Adeva48 , M. Adinolfi 56 , P. Adlarson86 , C. Agapopoulou 14 , C.A. Aidala 88 , Z. Ajaltouni 11, S. Akar11 , K. Akiba 38 ...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.