pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.10976 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-03 · 🧬 q-bio.NC

The Homological Brain: Parity Principle and Amortized Inference

Xin Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 02:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.NC
keywords homological brainparity principletopological condensationamortized inferencealgebraic topologyneural computationwake-sleep cycle
0
0 comments X

The pith

The brain converts slow inference searches into fast navigation by condensing topological flows into stable scaffolds using the Parity Principle.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that the brain performs computation by building and navigating topological structures rather than through direct vector operations or error minimization. It centers on the Parity Principle, which divides stable content into even-dimensional scaffolds and dynamic context into odd-dimensional flows. A three-stage process of search, closure, and condensation then collapses validated flows into new scaffolds, turning high-complexity recursive search into low-complexity navigation over a learned manifold. This unification explains how slow synaptic changes can support rapid perceptual synthesis and links several existing theories of brain function.

Core claim

In the Homological Brain, neural computation is the construction and navigation of topological structure. The Parity Principle creates a homological partition between even-dimensional scaffolds encoding stable content (Φ) and odd-dimensional flows encoding dynamic context (Ψ). Transient contextual flows undergo a topological trinity transformation—Search (open-chain exploration), Closure (cycle formation), and Condensation (collapse into new scaffold)—that converts NPSPACE-complete search into P-like navigation, allowing the brain to amortize past inference for rapid perceptual integration.

What carries the argument

The Parity Principle, which partitions even-dimensional scaffolds for stable content from odd-dimensional flows for dynamic context, together with the three-stage topological trinity of Search, Closure, and Condensation that collapses validated flows into scaffolds.

If this is right

  • Topological condensation converts high-complexity recursive search into low-complexity navigation over a learned manifold.
  • The framework unifies the Wake-Sleep cycle, episodic-to-semantic consolidation, and dual-process theories as instances of the same homology engine.
  • The brain minimizes topological complexity to transmute high-entropy sensory flux into low-entropy invariant cognitive structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If correct, models of learning should emphasize manifold construction for navigation over pure weight adjustment.
  • Neural recordings could be reanalyzed for signatures of even-dimensional scaffolds versus odd-dimensional flows during inference tasks.
  • The approach suggests designing AI architectures that explicitly track topological cycles and condensations to achieve similar amortization.

Load-bearing premise

Neural computation is fundamentally the construction and navigation of topological structure partitioned by the Parity Principle between even-dimensional scaffolds and odd-dimensional flows.

What would settle it

Direct measurements showing that brain activity during rapid perceptual integration cannot be partitioned into even-dimensional stable structures and odd-dimensional transient flows, or that condensation fails to reduce search complexity to navigation complexity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.10976 by Xin Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Hasse diagram of the face poset of a tetrahedron, with even (blue) and odd (red) dimensions highlighted. The side legend illustrates the parity principle separating even and odd ranks. (b) The Parity Partition: Scaffold vs. Flow Following Principle 1 (Homological Parity), we partition the homology groups Hk(X)the independent classes of cycles-based on the parity of dimension k. We explicitly map this topol… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Homological memory architecture based on scaffold-flow model. The backbone σ represents the reusable substrate that preserves global coherence, while each bk corresponds to an admissible what-if trajectory explored through local deformation. Bootstrapping F expands inference along a loop, generating counterfactual flow, and retrieval R projects the system back onto σ, enforcing boundary closure. Alternatin… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Two-phase scaffold–flow dynamics. Left: during sleep, topological condensation transforms episodic contextual flows (replay trajectories in Hodd) into refinements of the content scaffold σ ∈ Heven by driving residual boundaries ∂di → 0. Right: during waking inference, topological expansion melts the scaffold back into contextual flows, using stored structure to generate predictions and explore admissible i… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Biological intelligence emerges from substrates that are slow, noisy, and energetically constrained, yet it performs rapid and coherent inference in open-ended environments. Classical computational theories, built around vector-space transformations and instantaneous error minimization, struggle to reconcile the slow timescale of synaptic plasticity with the fast timescale of perceptual synthesis. We propose a unifying framework based on algebraic topology, the Homological Brain, in which neural computation is understood as the construction and navigation of topological structure. Central to this view is the Parity Principle, a homological partition between even-dimensional scaffolds encoding stable content ($\Phi$) and odd-dimensional flows encoding dynamic context ($\Psi$). Transient contextual flows are resolved through a three-stage topological trinity transformation: Search (open-chain exploration), Closure (topological cycle formation), and Condensation (collapse of validated flows into new scaffold). This process converts high-complexity recursive search (formally modeled by Savitch's Theorem in NPSPACE) into low-complexity navigation over a learned manifold (analogous to memoized Dynamic Programming in P). In this framework, topological condensation is the mechanism that transforms a ``search problem'' into a ``navigation task'', allowing the brain to amortize past inference and achieve rapid perceptual integration. This perspective unifies the Wake-Sleep cycle, episodic-to-semantic consolidation, and dual-process theories (System 1-vs-System 2), revealing the brain as a homology engine that minimizes topological complexity to transmute high-entropy sensory flux into low-entropy, invariant cognitive structure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the Homological Brain framework, in which neural computation is the construction and navigation of topological structures. It introduces the Parity Principle as a homological partition between even-dimensional scaffolds (Φ) encoding stable content and odd-dimensional flows (Ψ) encoding dynamic context. A three-stage topological trinity transformation (Search, Closure, Condensation) is claimed to convert high-complexity recursive search (modeled via Savitch's theorem in NPSPACE) into low-complexity navigation over a learned manifold (analogous to memoized dynamic programming in P). Topological condensation is presented as the mechanism that amortizes past inference, enabling rapid perceptual integration and unifying the wake-sleep cycle, episodic-to-semantic consolidation, and dual-process theories.

Significance. If the proposed mappings could be made rigorous, the framework would offer a distinctive topological perspective on how slow, noisy biological substrates support fast, coherent inference by minimizing topological complexity. The explicit linkage to complexity-theoretic results (Savitch, dynamic programming) and the unification of several established neurocognitive dichotomies are potentially valuable organizing ideas, though the absence of any formal derivations or concrete examples currently limits the framework to the status of a suggestive analogy.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and trinity transformation discussion] The central complexity-reduction claim (Abstract) invokes Savitch's theorem to model the search problem and asserts that the Search-Closure-Condensation sequence reduces it to P-space navigation, yet supplies no explicit chain-complex construction, boundary operator, simplicial set, or functor that would establish the claimed homological equivalence between biological dynamics and the topological trinity.
  2. [Parity Principle definition] The Parity Principle (Abstract) is defined to partition even-dimensional scaffolds from odd-dimensional flows precisely so as to explain stable content versus dynamic context; this renders the partition explanatory by construction rather than by independent derivation or external benchmark.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Notation in Abstract] The symbols Φ and Ψ are introduced without an explicit preceding definition or reference to prior topological literature, which may hinder readability for a general neuroscience audience.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. The feedback has prompted us to clarify the conceptual scope of the Homological Brain framework and to strengthen the presentation of its core ideas. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and trinity transformation discussion] The central complexity-reduction claim (Abstract) invokes Savitch's theorem to model the search problem and asserts that the Search-Closure-Condensation sequence reduces it to P-space navigation, yet supplies no explicit chain-complex construction, boundary operator, simplicial set, or functor that would establish the claimed homological equivalence between biological dynamics and the topological trinity.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not supply explicit chain-complex constructions or functors establishing a direct homological equivalence. The references to Savitch's theorem and dynamic programming are intended as complexity-theoretic analogies that illustrate how the three-stage trinity can convert high-complexity search into lower-complexity navigation, rather than as a claim of formal isomorphism. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection that provides a schematic mapping between the Search, Closure, and Condensation stages and basic homological notions (open chains, cycles, and collapse), while explicitly stating that a complete algebraic-topological formalization lies beyond the present conceptual framework and is reserved for future work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Parity Principle definition] The Parity Principle (Abstract) is defined to partition even-dimensional scaffolds from odd-dimensional flows precisely so as to explain stable content versus dynamic context; this renders the partition explanatory by construction rather than by independent derivation or external benchmark.

    Authors: The Parity Principle is introduced as a foundational postulate motivated by the empirical separation between persistent, low-entropy cognitive structures and transient, high-entropy contextual dynamics. To reduce the appearance of definitional circularity, the revised manuscript now includes additional grounding drawn from topological data analysis literature and from established neurocognitive distinctions (e.g., episodic versus semantic memory). These references supply independent motivation for the even-dimensional scaffold versus odd-dimensional flow partition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Homological Brain mechanisms (Parity Principle, trinity) are introduced by definition to enact the claimed search-to-navigation reduction.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "Central to this view is the Parity Principle, a homological partition between even-dimensional scaffolds encoding stable content (Φ) and odd-dimensional flows encoding dynamic context (Ψ). Transient contextual flows are resolved through a three-stage topological trinity transformation: Search (open-chain exploration), Closure (topological cycle formation), and Condensation (collapse of validated flows into new scaffold). This process converts high-complexity recursive search (formally modeled by Savitch's Theorem in NPSPACE) into low-complexity navigation over a learned manifold (analogous to "

    The Parity Principle and trinity transformation are defined as the homological partition and sequence that perform the complexity reduction; the paper asserts that condensation 'transforms a search problem into a navigation task' without supplying an explicit simplicial set, boundary map, or homology computation that would derive the NPSPACE-to-P equivalence from neural data or dynamics. The claimed mechanism is therefore equivalent to its own definitional inputs.

full rationale

The paper proposes the Homological Brain as a framework in which neural computation is the construction and navigation of topological structure, with the Parity Principle and Search-Closure-Condensation sequence posited to convert NPSPACE search into P navigation. This central claim is supported only by the definitional introduction of the mechanisms themselves and an analogy to Savitch's theorem and dynamic programming, without an explicit chain complex, boundary operator, or functor relating biological dynamics to the topological objects. The unification of Wake-Sleep, episodic-to-semantic consolidation, and System 1/2 theories is presented as a consequence of the framework rather than an independent derivation. This constitutes partial circularity via self-definition of the explanatory primitives, but the paper remains a conceptual proposal with some independent unifying content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on several newly introduced concepts and domain assumptions without upstream quantitative support or independent evidence.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Neural computation can be modeled as construction and navigation of topological structure.
    Stated as the unifying framework in the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper A Parity Principle partitions even-dimensional scaffolds for stable content from odd-dimensional flows for dynamic context.
    Introduced as central to the Homological Brain view.
invented entities (3)
  • Homological Brain no independent evidence
    purpose: Unifying framework for neural computation via topology
    New overarching model proposed in the abstract.
  • Parity Principle no independent evidence
    purpose: Homological partition between stable content and dynamic context
    Core new principle introduced without prior citation.
  • Topological trinity transformation no independent evidence
    purpose: Three-stage process (Search, Closure, Condensation) for resolving flows
    Mechanism invented to convert search into navigation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5558 in / 1397 out tokens · 72028 ms · 2026-05-17T02:50:13.228725+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    Central to this view is the Parity Principle, a homological partition between even-dimensional scaffolds encoding stable content (Φ) and odd-dimensional flows encoding dynamic context (Ψ). ... topological trinity transformation: Search (open-chain exploration), Closure (topological cycle formation), and Condensation

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDualityProof.lean linking_forces_d3_cert echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    Closure induces Euler-Poincaré balance. ... ∂² = 0 ... even-dimensional and odd-dimensional homology contribute with opposite sign

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2002 Neuromorphic electronic systems

    Mead C. 2002 Neuromorphic electronic systems. Proceedings of the IEEE 78, 1629–1636

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    2010 The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?

    Friston K. 2010 The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?. Nature reviews neuroscience 11, 127–138

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    2005Theoretical neuroscience: computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems

    Dayan P , Abbott LF. 2005Theoretical neuroscience: computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems

    work page

  4. [4]

    1998 Perceptual neuroscience: the cerebral cortex

    Mountcastle VB. 1998 Perceptual neuroscience: the cerebral cortex . Harvard University Press

    work page 1998

  5. [5]

    1985 Learning internal representations by error propagation

    Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ et al.. 1985 Learning internal representations by error propagation

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    2014 Neuronal dynamics: From single neurons to networks and models of cognition

    Gerstner W, Kistler WM, Naud R, Paninski L. 2014 Neuronal dynamics: From single neurons to networks and models of cognition . Cambridge University Press

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    2012 The economy of brain network organization

    Bullmore E, Sporns O. 2012 The economy of brain network organization. Nature reviews neuroscience 13, 336–349

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    1949 The organization of behavior; a neuropsychological theory

    Hebb D. 1949 The organization of behavior; a neuropsychological theory

    work page 1949

  9. [9]

    2016 Information geometry and its applications vol

    Amari Si. 2016 Information geometry and its applications vol. 194. Springer

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    2012 Analog VLSI implementation of neural systems vol

    Mead C, Ismail M. 2012 Analog VLSI implementation of neural systems vol. 80. Springer Science & Business Media

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    2025 Topological Neuroscience: Linking Circuits to Function

    Curto C, Sanderson N. 2025 Topological Neuroscience: Linking Circuits to Function. Annual Review of Neuroscience 48

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    1990 Information, physics, quantum: The search for links

    Wheeler JA. 1990 Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information

    work page 1990

  13. [13]

    2022 Computational topology: an introduction

    Edelsbrunner H, Harer JL. 2022 Computational topology: an introduction . American Mathematical Society

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    2014 Amortized inference in probabilistic reasoning

    Gershman S, Goodman N. 2014 Amortized inference in probabilistic reasoning. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society vol. 36

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Relationships between nondeterministic and determin- istic tape complexities

    Savitch WJ. 1970 Relationships between nondeterministic and deterministic tape complexities. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 4, 177–192. (10.1016/S0022-0000(70)80006-X)

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-0000(70)80006-x 1970

  16. [16]

    1966 Dynamic programming

    Bellman R. 1966 Dynamic programming. science 153, 34–37

    work page 1966

  17. [17]

    2013 The theta-gamma neural code

    Lisman JE, Jensen O. 2013 The theta-gamma neural code. Neuron 77, 1002–1016

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    2018 Geometry, topology and physics

    Nakahara M. 2018 Geometry, topology and physics . CRC press

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    1929 The uncertainty principle

    Robertson HP . 1929 The uncertainty principle. Physical Review 34, 163

    work page 1929

  20. [20]

    2010 Colloquium: topological insulators

    Hasan MZ, Kane CL. 2010 Colloquium: topological insulators. Reviews of modern physics 82, 3045–3067

    work page 2010

  21. [21]

    1998 Elements of applied bifurcation theory

    Kuznetsov YA. 1998 Elements of applied bifurcation theory . Springer

    work page 1998

  22. [22]

    John Wiley & Sons

    1999 Elements of information theory . John Wiley & Sons

    work page 1999

  23. [23]

    2015 Memory consolidation

    Squire LR, Genzel L, Wixted JT, Morris RG. 2015 Memory consolidation. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology 7, a021766

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    1967 Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines

    Minsky ML. 1967 Computation: Finite and Infinite Machines . Prentice-Hall

    work page 1967

  25. [25]

    1957 Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat’s somatic sensory cortex

    Mountcastle VB. 1957 Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat’s somatic sensory cortex. Journal of neurophysiology 20, 408–434

    work page 1957

  26. [26]

    2008 Spike timing–dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule

    Caporale N, Dan Y . 2008 Spike timing–dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 31, 25–46

    work page 2008

  27. [27]

    1996 The hippocampo-neocortical dialogue

    Buzsáki G. 1996 The hippocampo-neocortical dialogue. Cerebral cortex 6, 81–92

    work page 1996

  28. [28]

    wake-sleep

    Hinton GE, Dayan P , Frey BJ, Neal RM. 1995 The" wake-sleep" algorithm for unsupervised neural networks. Science 268, 1158–1161. 12royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rstbPhil. T rans. R. Soc. B0000000

    work page 1995

  29. [29]

    2011 Thinking, fast and slow

    Kahneman D. 2011 Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    2011 The Feynman lectures on physics, Vol

    Feynman RP , Leighton RB, Sands M. 2011 The Feynman lectures on physics, Vol. I: The new millennium edition: mainly mechanics, radiation, and heat vol. 1. Basic books

    work page 2011

  31. [31]

    1972 Episodic and semantic memory

    Tulving E et al.. 1972 Episodic and semantic memory . Organization of memory 1, 1

    work page 1972

  32. [32]

    2025 Principles of biological autonomy

    Varela FJ. 2025 Principles of biological autonomy . MIT Press

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    1985 Does the autistic child have a theory of mind?

    Baron-Cohen S, Leslie AM, Frith U. 1985 Does the autistic child have a theory of mind?. Cognition 21, 37–46

    work page 1985

  34. [34]

    Sheaf theory: from deep geometry to deep learning , shorttitle =

    Ayzenberg A, Gebhart T, Magai G, Solomadin G. 2025 Sheaf theory: from deep geometry to deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.15476

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    2006 Polychronization: computation with spikes

    Izhikevich EM. 2006 Polychronization: computation with spikes. Neural computation 18, 245–282

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    2005 Algebraic topology

    Hatcher A. 2005 Algebraic topology

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    1994 Reactivation of hippocampal ensemble memories during sleep

    Wilson MA, McNaughton BL. 1994 Reactivation of hippocampal ensemble memories during sleep. Science 265, 676–679

    work page 1994

  38. [38]

    1961 Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process

    Landauer R. 1961 Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process. IBM journal of research and development 5, 183– 191

    work page 1961

  39. [39]

    1997 The columnar organization of the neocortex

    Mountcastle VB. 1997 The columnar organization of the neocortex.. Brain: a journal of neurology 120, 701–722

    work page 1997

  40. [40]

    2006 Rhythms of the Brain

    Buzsaki G. 2006 Rhythms of the Brain . Oxford university press

    work page 2006

  41. [41]

    1992 Q-learning.Machine learning 8, 279–292

    Watkins CJ, Dayan P . 1992 Q-learning.Machine learning 8, 279–292

    work page 1992

  42. [42]

    2018 Reinforcement learning: An introduction

    Sutton RS. 2018 Reinforcement learning: An introduction. A Bradford Book

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    2005 New approaches to demystifying insight

    Bowden EM, Jung-Beeman M, Fleck J, Kounios J. 2005 New approaches to demystifying insight. T rends in cognitive sciences 9, 322–328

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    2008 A universe of consciousness: How matter becomes imagination

    Edelman GM, Tononi G. 2008 A universe of consciousness: How matter becomes imagination . Hachette UK

    work page 2008

  45. [45]

    2016 Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate

    Tononi G, Boly M, Massimini M, Koch C. 2016 Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature reviews neuroscience 17, 450–461

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    2005 Theory of mind

    Frith C, Frith U. 2005 Theory of mind. Current biology 15, R644–R645

    work page 2005

  47. [47]

    2003Phenomenal consciousness: A naturalistic theory

    Carruthers P . 2003Phenomenal consciousness: A naturalistic theory . Cambridge University Press

    work page

  48. [48]

    1995 On a confusion about a function of consciousness

    Block N. 1995 On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and brain sciences 18, 227–247

    work page 1995

  49. [49]

    2000 The paradox of self-consciousness

    Bermúdez JL. 2000 The paradox of self-consciousness . MIT Press

    work page 2000

  50. [50]

    2017 The hard problem of consciousness

    Chalmers D. 2017 The hard problem of consciousness. The Blackwell companion to consciousness pp. 32–42

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    1998 Epiphenomenal qualia

    Jackson F. 1998 Epiphenomenal qualia. In Consciousness and emotion in cognitive science , pp. 197–206. Routledge

    work page 1998

  52. [52]

    Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4

    Bubeck S, Chandrasekaran V , Eldan R, Gehrke J, Horvitz E, Kamar E, Lee P , Lee YT, Li Y , Lundberg S et al.. 2023 Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    2004 Core mechanisms in theory of mind

    Leslie AM, Friedman O, German TP . 2004 Core mechanisms in theory of mind. T rends in cognitive sciences8, 528–533

    work page 2004

  54. [54]

    2009 Imitation, empathy , and mirror neurons

    Iacoboni M. 2009 Imitation, empathy , and mirror neurons. Annual review of psychology 60, 653–670

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    2016 Empathy: A review of the concept

    Cuff BM, Brown SJ, Taylor L, Howat DJ. 2016 Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion review 8, 144–153

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    2018 Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self

    Fonagy P , Gergely G, Jurist EL. 2018 Affect regulation, mentalization and the development of the self . Routledge

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    1987 Social cognition and social perception

    Higgins ET, Bargh JA. 1987 Social cognition and social perception. Annual review of psychology 38, 369–425

    work page 1987