Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 102 references

The gamma-ray nebula around microquasar V4641 Sgr needs both protons and electrons: pion-decay from proton-gas collisions makes the >100 TeV emission, and electron synchrotron makes the X-rays.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 16:24 UTC pith:A45GMWNH

load-bearing objection A transparent leptohadronic modeling paper worth refereeing; the HI-distance assumption is the weak joint, and the paper already knows it. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.13578 v2 pith:A45GMWNH submitted 2025-12-15 astro-ph.HE

Leptonic and hadronic models of high-energy nebula around V4641 Sgr

Maksim Kleimenov , Andrii Neronov , Foteini Oikonomou , Dmitri Semikoz This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords microquasarV4641 Sgrgamma-ray nebulaleptohadronic modelproton-proton collisionsneutral-hydrogen gasPeVatronanisotropic diffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Taking the 200-parsec-scale, very-high-energy nebula around the microquasar V4641 Sgr as a case study, the paper asks which particle population—electrons, protons, or both—produces the observed gamma-ray and X-ray glow. It argues that neither pure leptonic nor pure hadronic emission works: leptonic models need contrived magnetic-field geometry and cannot easily explain the asymmetric, energy-growing shape, while hadronic models require more than 10^50 erg in protons and cannot produce the extended X-ray emission seen toward the source. The authors construct self-consistent leptohadronic models in which the >100 TeV gamma rays come from neutral-pion decay following proton-proton collisions with a cold neutral-hydrogen overdensity near the source, while synchrotron radiation from directly accelerated electrons accounts for the X-rays. If right, V4641 Sgr is a PeV-scale proton accelerator and the nebula becomes a multimessenger target with predicted X-ray and neutrino signals that can test the model.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that no single emission component can explain the nebula. A purely leptonic model—continuous injection of electrons that up-scatter microwave background photons and radiate synchrotron—is energetically cheap (luminosity around 10^36 erg/s, well below the black hole's critical luminosity) but only reproduces the observed north-south asymmetry if the Galactic magnetic field bends on a roughly 200 pc scale or if particles sit in a finely tuned ballistic-to-diffusive transition. A purely hadronic model—a flash of protons diffusing along the magnetic field and producing gamma rays through proton-proton collisions with a nearby cold-gas overdensity—matches the morpholo

What carries the argument

The engine is proton-proton pion production against a cold-gas target. The authors identify an overdensity in the all-sky neutral-hydrogen map, in the velocity range 100–200 km/s (adopted 125 km/s), that is spatially aligned with the gamma-ray nebula and has an average density of roughly 0.1 cm^-3, rising to about 1 cm^-3 in the densest regions. Combined with anisotropic diffusion of high-energy protons along the Galactic magnetic field (longitudinal scale 55–110 pc inferred from flux profiles, with a parallel-to-perpendicular diffusion ratio near 13 and an energy-dependent diffusion coefficient roughly scaling as E^{1/3}), the gas distribution imprints the observed energy-dependent, asymmet

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the neutral-hydrogen overdensity seen at 100–200 km/s lies at the source's roughly 6 kpc distance and serves as the target for proton-proton collisions; if that gas is foreground or background, the hadronic morphology explanation and the leptohadronic fits lose their anchor.

What would settle it

Measure the distance of the HI feature directly—for example, through HI absorption against background continuum sources along the same line of sight—and check whether it is at roughly 6 kpc; alternatively, accumulate neutrino exposure to confirm or exclude the predicted flux; or image the nebula's X-ray tips and see whether the predicted minimal synchrotron flux appears while the gamma rays persist.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The >100 TeV signal is hadronic, so V4641 Sgr is a PeV-scale proton accelerator contributing to the Galactic cosmic-ray budget through proton-proton collisions in its surrounding gas.
  • The predicted neutrino flux from the hadronic component should be detectable by next-generation neutrino telescopes, offering an unambiguous test within roughly a decade.
  • X-ray observations at the nebula's tips can discriminate the models: the leptonic component predicts a minimal synchrotron flux there that a hadron-dominated scenario would not produce.
  • The nebula's angular size should grow with photon energy following a roughly E^{1/6} scaling from the assumed diffusion law; future imaging atmospheric telescope arrays can test this energy dependence of particle transport.
  • If the extended X-ray emission is genuinely associated with the source, a purely hadronic interpretation is excluded—directly accelerated electrons must exist alongside the protons.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the spatial coincidence between the gas overdensity and the gamma-ray brightness asymmetry is confirmed kinematically—say, by measuring an HI absorption distance—the hadronic interpretation would be on much firmer ground, and V4641 Sgr would become a clean laboratory for tracing PeV protons to their target gas.
  • If that gas instead lies in the foreground or background, the hadronic morphology explanation collapses, and the leptonic ballistic-to-diffusive transition becomes the most plausible asymmetric scenario—still viable but less preferred energetically.
  • The flash-plus-continuous-injection construction suggests a natural extension: monitoring future X-ray or radio outbursts of the binary should modulate the leptonic component on short timescales while leaving the hadronic component stable, a temporal signature not emphasized in the paper.
  • The paper leaves open the possibility that the extended X-ray emission comes from an unrelated inner-Galaxy X-ray structure; if that is true, the purely hadronic model regains viability and the decisive tension becomes the enormous proton energy budget.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper models the extended high-energy nebula around the microquasar V4641 Sgr using leptonic, hadronic, and leptohadronic scenarios, and attempts to reproduce the observed gamma-ray spectrum and morphology simultaneously. It argues that purely leptonic models are energetically efficient but morphologically contrived, that a purely hadronic model can explain the gamma-ray asymmetry via proton-proton interactions on an HI overdensity but requires ~10^50 erg in protons and cannot explain the XRISM extended X-ray emission, and that a combination of hadronic and leptonic components can reproduce both the spectral and morphological data. The paper also provides predictions for the X-ray flux at the nebula's tips and for neutrino fluxes, and emphasizes that the fits are not unique.

Significance. If the central conclusion holds, this would be an important step in understanding a potential PeV cosmic-ray accelerator: it would establish a hadronic origin for the >100 TeV emission and connect the gamma-ray morphology to a specific gas overdensity in the Galactic bar region. The paper is transparent about degeneracies and alternative interpretations, uses public survey data and standard transport/radiative tools, and provides falsifiable predictions (X-ray tip fluxes, neutrino fluxes) that can be tested with future instruments. The main significance, however, is conditional on two associations—the distance of the HI gas and the physical connection of the XRISM X-ray emission to the nebula—neither of which is currently confirmed. The modeling framework itself is standard and the parameter estimates are plausible, but the central morphological argument rests on an assumption that is explicitly recognized in the text as uncertain.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. V A, Figs. 6–7, Appendix F] The hadronic and leptohadronic conclusions rest on the association of the HI4PI feature at v=125 km/s with a gas cloud at d≈6.1 kpc. The text correctly notes that the tangent-point distance-velocity relation is inapplicable in the bar region, and the 100–200 km/s interval is inferred from bar hydrodynamics and spatial coincidence. The sightline at l≈6.8°, b≈-4.8° passes through a long path in the bar region, so foreground or background gas at similar velocities is a real possibility. If this overdensity is not at the source distance, then the n_HI~0.1–1 cm^-3 used in Secs. V C–D and the corresponding E_prot~10^50(n0/n) erg values are not tied to V4641 Sgr, and the morphology match in Fig. 7 becomes a projection effect. This is the central load-bearing assumption of the paper. A 21-cm absorption measurement toward a background continuum source, or another independent kinematic/distance co
  2. [Sec. V B] The paper explicitly allows that the XRISM extended X-ray emission may be unrelated to the source, e.g., part of a larger inner-Galaxy structure. Yet the exclusion of the purely hadronic model and the requirement for a directly accelerated electron component follow from attributing the XRISM flux to the nebula. Since this is an admitted alternative, the statement that a purely hadronic model 'fails to reproduce the extended X-ray emission' is conditional: if the XRISM emission is unrelated, a purely hadronic model is not ruled out, and the central 'no single-component model works' conclusion is weakened. The authors should clearly carry this contingency through the abstract and conclusions, and, where possible, quantify the chance-coincidence probability (e.g., source counts of X-ray emitters within the XRISM region).
  3. [Sec. IV C, Sec. V A, Fig. 7] The morphological comparison is qualitative. For the leptonic explanations, R_curv, projection angle, and the ballistic-diffusion timescale τ are free inputs with no reported likelihood; for the hadronic maps, the high-energy proton distribution is assumed symmetric about the source and the predicted map is compared by eye with the observed TS maps. Thus the claim that the hadronic scenario 'can better explain' the gamma-ray morphology is not established by a quantitative criterion. A quantitative comparison—e.g., a 2D likelihood, a TS-map correlation, or at least residual profiles—would be needed to support the central morphological argument. Without it, the paper's key claim remains an interpretation rather than a constrained inference.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 3 and text in Sec. III] The figure axis label says 'Flux above 8 TeV' while the caption and the text use 'above 0.8 TeV'; please correct the inconsistency.
  2. [Sec. VI, first paragraph] 'A recent paper by XRISM reports the measurement of an extended gamma-ray emission around the binary' should read 'extended X-ray emission'.
  3. [Sec. II B] 'with the following features: a) its size...' contains a duplicated phrase 'with the with the following features'.
  4. [Appendix D, Eq. (D2)] In the flash solution, the prefactor is written as Q t; for the stated source q_flash = N0 δ(t)δ(r) it should be N0. Please correct the notation.
  5. [Appendix C, Fig. 15 caption and Fig. 12 legend] Typos: 'Luminocity' should be 'Luminosity'; 'quiscence' should be 'quiescence'.
  6. [Sec. V C–D] The model parameters for the leptohadronic models (Γ_p, E_cut,p, E_prot, L_e, B, t) are presented without uncertainties or a systematic exploration of the allowed region (beyond noting that the fit is not unique). Reporting at least rough ranges or a corner plot would help the reader assess how strongly the data prefer the quoted parameters.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the main neutrino and tip-X-ray predictions are forward calculations, and the hadronic gas-distance/morphology association is explicitly conditional.

full rationale

The paper's central model chain is not circular by construction. The diffusion scale is fitted to the H.E.S.S. 1D profile (Sec. III), but this fit is then used to build a 2D hadronic morphology map from the independent HI4PI gas map (Sec. V A), and the >100 TeV size is extrapolated via a Kolmogorov scaling rather than refit. The neutrino fluxes (Sec. V E) and the X-ray flux at the nebula tips (Sec. VI) are predictions computed from fitted models, not inputs to those fits. The leptohadronic decomposition is an interpretive fit, and the paper itself states the non-uniqueness ('the fit is not unique', Sec. V D) and the conditionality of the X-ray association ('It is in principle possible that X-ray flux does not correlate with high-energy emission', Sec. V B). The hadronic interpretation likewise rests on an explicitly stated assumption that the 125 km/s HI feature is at the source distance ('if the detected overdensity corresponds to the source location', Sec. V A), with the tangent-point caveat acknowledged; this is a correctness/robustness risk, not an identity reduction. Self-citations to [25] provide a published hadronic template and Fermi data reduction, but the present leptohadronic parameters are re-derived, and [25] is externally testable with IceCube/XRISM data; this is not load-bearing circularity. Overall, the claimed predictions are forward calculations with stated assumptions, so the circularity score is low.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

11 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two associative leaps (HI gas at the source distance; XRISM X-rays belong to the nebula) and on roughly a dozen parameters that are fit or chosen rather than independently measured. The formalism itself is standard transport theory plus pp/IC emission.

free parameters (11)
  • Magnetic field strength B = 3 μG (continuous leptonic), 4 μG (leptohadronic)
    Chosen as the minimal field that lets synchrotron emission match XRISM X-ray data while IC matches gamma-rays (Sec. IV B, Sec. V C).
  • Electron injection index Γ_e = 1.9–2.0
    Tuned to the deabsorbed gamma-ray and X-ray spectra; varies between continuous leptonic and leptohadronic fits.
  • Electron cutoff energy E_cut,e = 6 PeV (leptonic), 1 PeV (leptohadronic)
    Chosen so that the IC spectrum reaches the LHAASO/HAWC points without overshooting.
  • Diffusion scale sqrt(4 D∥ t) = 55 pc (flash), 110 pc (continuous)
    Fit to H.E.S.S. profile along the major axis (Sec. III, Fig. 3); controls all morphology predictions.
  • D∥/D⊥ anisotropy ratio = 13
    Inferred from the H.E.S.S. minor-axis width σ_minor in the assumed straight-field diffusion geometry (Sec. III).
  • Nebula age t = 2 or 8 kyr (leptonic), 3 or 8 kyr (leptohadronic)
    Derived from diffusion scale under η=1, B≈4 μG and projected-length assumptions; used as free parameter in fits.
  • Proton injection index Γ_p = 1.3 (leptohadronic), 1.8 (hadronic flash of [25])
    Fitted to the >40 TeV gamma-ray spectrum; the paper notes it can soften to 1.6 if B increases to 10 μG.
  • Proton cutoff E_cut,p = 5 PeV
    Chosen to match the highest-energy LHAASO photons; no independent constraint.
  • Total proton energy E_prot = 0.8–1.0e50 erg × (n0/n), n0=1 cm^-3
    Required by the hadronic flux normalization; scales inversely with the unknown target gas density n, and is acknowledged as extreme.
  • Morphology free inputs (R_curv, projection angle, ballistic-diffusion τ) = R_curv=200 pc; θ=45° in Fig. 5
    The leptonic asymmetry explanations (bent field line or ballistic-diffusive transition) depend on unconstrained geometric/transport parameters (Sec. IV C).
  • Electron luminosity L_e = 2e36 erg/s (leptohadronic continuous)
    Result of the fit; near the energetic minimum in the B–t plane (Appendix C).
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Nebula major axis is a magnetic-field-aligned straight diffusion channel with anisotropy D∥/D⊥=13; projection along the line of sight is not known.
    Used in Sec. III to convert H.E.S.S. profile widths to ages and in Secs. IV-V to model morphology.
  • ad hoc to paper HI4PI gas in the velocity range 100–200 km/s (reference 125 km/s) is located at V4641 Sgr's distance.
    Required for hadronic morphology (Sec. V A, Fig. 6); kinematic distance method is acknowledged invalid near the bar, so the association relies on spatial coincidence.
  • domain assumption XRISM 2–10 keV extended emission is physically associated with the nebula.
    Used to rule out purely hadronic models and to require an electron component (Sec. V B); the text explicitly allows it may be unrelated.
  • domain assumption Quasi-linear theory with Kolmogorov turbulence gives D∥ ∝ (E/B)^{1/3} η^{-2} with η≈1 inferred from minor width.
    Used in Sec. III, Sec. V A and Fig. 14 to extrapolate diffusion lengths from TeV to PeV energies.
  • domain assumption Axisymmetric interstellar radiation field of Popescu et al. [46] is valid at the source; CMB/dust/starlight densities are as modeled.
    Underpins the IC and synchrotron cooling calculations in Sec. IV.
  • domain assumption The particle release history is either a single flash or continuous injection at constant rate.
    The two history models in Appendix D bracket the transport solutions; the true source activity (frequent but weak flares, one giant 1999 flare) is more complex.
  • standard math pp interactions and secondary products are described by the aafrag parameterization [59].
    Used for hadronic gamma-ray and neutrino yields (Sec. V).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 19263 in / 15613 out tokens · 131071 ms · 2026-08-03T16:24:09.226115+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

A prominent, 200-pc-scale high-energy nebula surrounding the microquasar V4641 Sgr is the brightest known gamma-ray source in the Southern sky at $E > 100\,\mathrm{TeV}$. In this paper, we develop self-consistent leptonic, hadronic, and leptohadronic models that reproduce both the observed spectrum and morphology of the source. Purely leptonic models are energetically more favorable yet they require rather specific morphological assumptions. The gamma-ray morphology of the source can be better explained within a hadronic scenario based on the identification of cold gas structures spatially correlated with the observed gamma-ray emission. However, a purely hadronic model for the source emission requires a substantial energy reservoir in protons and fails to reproduce the extended x-ray emission recently detected by XRISM. We show that emission including a combination of leptonic and hadronic components can reproduce both the spectral and morphological properties of the source. We provide predictions for the x-ray and neutrino spectra of the nebula that can discriminate the hadronic and leptonic contributions to the overall source signal.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.13578 by Andrii Neronov, Dmitri Semikoz, Foteini Oikonomou, Maksim Kleimenov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Position of V4641 Sgr in the Milky Way relative to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. H.E.S.S. total flux above 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Two leptonic scenarios explaining asymmetry of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. HI column density in the vicinity of the source in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Experimental data and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Predicted neutrino fluxes from a hadronic (red solid) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Historical lightcurve of the V4641 Sgr in blue [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Combined broad-band measurements of the V4641 X-ray binary. The sources are specified in the text. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Background radiation field number density (left) and energy density (right) with its constituents: CMB (red dash-dotted), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Size-on-energy dependence in H.E.S.S., HAWC, and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Distribution of sampled points on the lifetime-luminosity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Column density on velocity at five points along the right [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 15 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Ackermannet al.(Fermi-LAT), Fermi-LAT Observations of the Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emission: Implications for Cos- mic Rays and the Interstellar Medium, Astrophys

    M. Ackermannet al.(Fermi-LAT), Fermi-LAT Observations of the Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emission: Implications for Cos- mic Rays and the Interstellar Medium, Astrophys. J.750, 3 (2012), arXiv:1202.4039 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Neronov and D

    A. Neronov and D. Semikoz, Galactic diffuse gamma-ray emission at TeV energy, Astron. Astrophys.633, A94 (2020), arXiv:1907.06061 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  3. [3]

    Alfaroet al.(HA WC), Galactic Gamma-Ray Diffuse Emission at TeV Energies with HA WC Data, Astrophys

    R. Alfaroet al.(HA WC), Galactic Gamma-Ray Diffuse Emission at TeV Energies with HA WC Data, Astrophys. J.961, 104 (2024), arXiv:2310.09117 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Caoet al.(LHAASO), Measurement of Ultra-High- Energy Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emission of the Galactic Plane from 10 TeV to 1 PeV with LHAASO-KM2A, Phys

    Z. Caoet al.(LHAASO), Measurement of Ultra-High- Energy Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emission of the Galactic Plane from 10 TeV to 1 PeV with LHAASO-KM2A, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 151001 (2023), arXiv:2305.05372 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Caoet al.(LHAASO), Measurement of Very-High-Energy Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emissions from the Galactic Plane with LHAASO-WCDA, Phys

    Z. Caoet al.(LHAASO), Measurement of Very-High-Energy Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emissions from the Galactic Plane with LHAASO-WCDA, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 081002 (2025), arXiv:2411.16021 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    S. Kaci, G. Giacinti, and D. Semikoz, On the Contribution of Unresolved Pulsars to the Ultra-high-energy Galactic Dif- fuse Gamma-Ray Emission, Astrophys. J.975, L6 (2024), arXiv:2407.20186 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Albertet al.(ANTARES), Hint for a TeV neutrino emis- sion from the Galactic Ridge with ANTARES, Phys

    A. Albertet al.(ANTARES), Hint for a TeV neutrino emis- sion from the Galactic Ridge with ANTARES, Phys. Lett. B841, 137951 (2023), arXiv:2212.11876 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Observation of high-energy neu- trinos from the Galactic plane, Science380, adc9818 (2023), arXiv:2307.04427 [astro-ph.HE]

    R. Abbasiet al.(IceCube), Observation of high-energy neu- trinos from the Galactic plane, Science380, adc9818 (2023), arXiv:2307.04427 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    V. A. Allakhverdyanet al.(Baikal-GVD), Probing the Galactic Neutrino Flux at Neutrino Energies above 200 TeV with the Baikal Gigaton Volume Detector, Astrophys. J. 982, 73 (2025), arXiv:2411.05608 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Prevotatet al., Energy dependence of the knee in the cosmic-ray spectrum across the Milky Way, Phys

    C. Prevotatet al., Energy dependence of the knee in the cosmic-ray spectrum across the Milky Way, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103035 (2024), arXiv:2407.11911 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    L. E. E. Castroet al., LHAASO protons versus LHAASO diffuse gamma-rays: a consistency check, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. L20, L26 (2025), arXiv:2506.06593 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Prevotatet al., Diffuse gamma-ray and neutrino emission from the Milky Way and the local knee in the cosmic ray spectrum, (2025), arXiv:2507.10823 [astro-ph.HE]

    C. Prevotatet al., Diffuse gamma-ray and neutrino emission from the Milky Way and the local knee in the cosmic ray spectrum, (2025), arXiv:2507.10823 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Giacinti and D

    G. Giacinti and D. Semikoz, Model of Cosmic Ray Propagation in the Milky Way at the Knee, (2023), arXiv:2305.10251 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    LHAASO Collaboration, Ultrahigh-energy gamma-ray emission associated with black hole-jet systems (2024), arXiv:2410.08988 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Giacinti, M

    G. Giacinti, M. Kachelriess, and D. V. Semikoz, Reconciling cosmic ray diffusion with Galactic magnetic field models, JCAP07, 051, arXiv:1710.08205 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Jansson and G

    R. Jansson and G. R. Farrar, A New Model of the Galactic Magnetic Field, Astrophys. J.757, 14 (2012), arXiv:1204.3662 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  17. [17]

    Unger and G

    M. Unger and G. R. Farrar, The Coherent Magnetic Field of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J.970, 95 (2024), arXiv:2311.12120 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Korochkin, D

    A. Korochkin, D. Semikoz, and P. Tinyakov, The coherent magnetic field of the Milky Way halo, the Local Bubble, and the Fan region, Astron. Astrophys.693, A284 (2025), arXiv:2407.02148 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Alfaroet al.(HA WC Collaboration), Ultra-high-energy gamma-ray bubble around microquasar v4641 sgr, Nature 634, 557–560 (2024)

    R. Alfaroet al.(HA WC Collaboration), Ultra-high-energy gamma-ray bubble around microquasar v4641 sgr, Nature 634, 557–560 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Acharyya, F

    A. Acharyya, F. Aharonian, H. Ashkar,et al.(H.E.S.S.), Constraining the nature of the most extreme Galactic par- ticle accelerator. H.E.S.S. observations of the microquasar V4641 Sgr (2025), arXiv:2511.10537 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    Olivera-Nieto (H.E.S.S

    L. Olivera-Nieto (H.E.S.S. Collaboration), H.E.S.S. detec- tion of very high energy emission surrounding the micro- quasar V4641 Sgr (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Suzukiet al., Detection of extended X-Ray emission around the PeVatron microquasar V4641 Sgr with XRISM, Astrophys

    H. Suzukiet al., Detection of extended X-Ray emission around the PeVatron microquasar V4641 Sgr with XRISM, Astrophys. J. Lett.978, L20 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Wan, J.-s

    S.-Y. Wan, J.-s. Wang, and R.-Y. Liu, A leptonic interpreta- tion of the uhe gamma-ray emission from v4641 sgr (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Dmytriiev, F

    A. Dmytriiev, F. Van der Merwe, and M. B¨ ottcher, Mod- eling particle acceleration and multi-wavelength emission of a PeVatron microquasar V4641 Sgr, inProceedings of High Energy Astrophysics in Southern Africa 2025 — PoS(HEASA2025), HEASA2025 (Sissa Medialab, 2025) p. 069

    2025

  25. [25]

    Neronov, F

    A. Neronov, F. Oikonomou, and D. Semikoz, Multimessen- ger signature of cosmic rays from the microquasar V4641 Sgr propagating along a Galactic magnetic field line, Phys. Rev. D111, 103025 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Carpio, A

    J. Carpio, A. Kheirandish, and B. Zhang, Multimessenger emission from very-high-energy black hole-jet systems in the milky way (2025), arXiv:2506.22550 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    R. K. D. MacDonaldet al., The black hole binary v4641 sagitarii: Activity in quiescence and improved mass deter- minations, Astrophys. J.784, 2 (2014)

    2014

  28. [28]

    R. M. Hjellminget al., Light curves and radio structure of the 1999 september transient event in V4641 sagittarii, Astrophys. J.544, 977 (2000)

    1999

  29. [29]

    A. G. A. Brownet al.(Gaia Collaboration), Gaia data re- lease 2, Astron. Astrophys.616, A1 (2018)

    2018

  30. [30]

    Vallenariet al.(Gaia Collaboration),Gaiadata release 3, Astron

    A. Vallenariet al.(Gaia Collaboration),Gaiadata release 3, Astron. Astrophys.674(2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    Bland-Hawthorn and O

    J. Bland-Hawthorn and O. Gerhard, The galaxy in con- text: Structural, kinematic, and integrated properties, An- nual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics54, 529–596 (2016)

    2016

  32. [32]

    Lindstrømet al., New clues on outburst mechanisms and improved spectroscopic elements of the black hole bi- nary V4641 Sagittarii, Mon

    C. Lindstrømet al., New clues on outburst mechanisms and improved spectroscopic elements of the black hole bi- nary V4641 Sagittarii, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.363, 882 (2005)

    2005

  33. [33]

    Drimmel and D

    R. Drimmel and D. N. Spergel, Three-dimensional structure of the milky way disk: The distribution of stars and dust beyond 0.35R ⊙, The Astrophysical Journal556, 181–202 (2001)

    2001

  34. [34]

    Salvesen and S

    G. Salvesen and S. Pokawanvit, Origin of spin–orbit mis- alignments: the microblazar V4641 sgr, Mon. Not. R. As- tron. Soc.495, 2179 (2020). 10

    2020

  35. [35]

    Revnivtsev, M

    M. Revnivtsev, M. Gilfanov, E. Churazov, and R. Sunyaev, Super-eddington outburst of V4641 Sgr, Astronomy & As- trophysics391, 1013–1022 (2002)

    2002

  36. [36]

    Chatyet al., Optical and near-infrared observations of the microquasar V4641 sgr during the 1999 september outburst, Mon

    S. Chatyet al., Optical and near-infrared observations of the microquasar V4641 sgr during the 1999 september outburst, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.343, 169 (2003)

    1999

  37. [37]

    Mu˜ noz-Darias, M

    T. Mu˜ noz-Darias, M. A. P. Torres, and M. R. Garcia, The low-luminosity accretion disc wind of the black hole tran- sient v4641 sagittarii, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society479, 10.1093/mnras/sty1711 (2018)

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1711 2018

  38. [38]

    A. U. Abeysekaraet al.(HA WC Collaboration), Observa- tion of the Crab nebula with the HA WC gamma-ray obser- vatory (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    A. M. Price-Whelanet al.(The Astropy Collaboration), The astropy project: Sustaining and growing a community- oriented open-source project and the latest major release (v5.0) of the core package*, The Astrophysical Journal935, 167 (2022)

    2022

  40. [40]

    Chuprikov and I

    A. Chuprikov and I. Guirin, V4641 Sgr and KV UMa. Two black hole candidates, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana82, 73 (2011)

    2011

  41. [41]

    Mart ´ ı and P

    J. Mart ´ ı and P. L. Luque-Escamilla, Alignment of radio jets in the microquasar v4641 sagittarii with its high-energy structures (2025), arXiv:2511.19695 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Kachelrieß and D

    M. Kachelrieß and D. Semikoz, Cosmic ray models, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics109, 103710 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    Giacinti, M

    G. Giacinti, M. Kachelriess, and D. V. Semikoz, Reconciling cosmic ray diffusion with Galactic magnetic field models, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2018(07), 051

    2018

  44. [44]

    Reichherzeret al., Turbulence-level dependence of cosmic ray parallel diffusion, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society498, 5051–5064 (2020)

    P. Reichherzeret al., Turbulence-level dependence of cosmic ray parallel diffusion, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society498, 5051–5064 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Mertsch, Test particle simulations of cosmic rays, Astro- physics and Space Science365, 10.1007/s10509-020-03832-3 (2020)

    P. Mertsch, Test particle simulations of cosmic rays, Astro- physics and Space Science365, 10.1007/s10509-020-03832-3 (2020)

    doi:10.1007/s10509-020-03832-3 2020

  46. [46]

    C. C. Popescuet al., A radiation transfer model for the milky way: I. radiation fields and application to high-energy astrophysics, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 2539–2558 (2017)

    2017

  47. [47]

    Z. Zhao, J. Li, and D. F. Torres, Upper limits on the gamma- ray emission from the microquasar v4641 sgr, The Astro- physical Journal984, 3 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    G. R. Blumenthal and R. J. Gould, Bremsstrahlung, syn- chrotron radiation, and compton scattering of high-energy electrons traversing dilute gases, Rev. Mod. Phys.42, 237 (1970)

    1970

  49. [49]

    Fouka and S

    M. Fouka and S. Ouichaoui, Analytical fits to the syn- chrotron functions, Research in Astronomy and Astro- physics13, 680–686 (2013)

    2013

  50. [50]

    Foreman-Mackeyet al.,emcee: The MCMC hammer, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific125, 306–312 (2013)

    D. Foreman-Mackeyet al.,emcee: The MCMC hammer, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific125, 306–312 (2013)

    2013

  51. [51]

    R. C. Tautz and I. Lerche, Application of the three- dimensional telegraph equation to cosmic-ray transport, Res. Astron. Astrophys.16, 162 (2016)

    2016

  52. [52]

    Misiriotiset al., The distribution of the ism in the milky way: A three-dimensional large-scale model, Astronomy & Astrophysics459, 113 (2006)

    A. Misiriotiset al., The distribution of the ism in the milky way: A three-dimensional large-scale model, Astronomy & Astrophysics459, 113 (2006)

    2006

  53. [53]

    Ferri` ere, W

    K. Ferri` ere, W. Gillard, and P. Jean, Spatial distribution of interstellar gas in the innermost 3 kpc of our galaxy, As- tronomy & Astrophysics467, 611 (2007)

    2007

  54. [54]

    Ben Bekhtiet al., HI4PI: a full-sky HI survey based on EBHIS and GASS, Astronomy & Astrophysics594, A116 (2016)

    N. Ben Bekhtiet al., HI4PI: a full-sky HI survey based on EBHIS and GASS, Astronomy & Astrophysics594, A116 (2016)

    2016

  55. [55]

    Chemin, F

    L. Chemin, F. Renaud, and C. Soubiran, Incorrect rotation curve of the milky way, Astronomy & Astrophysics578, A14 (2015)

    2015

  56. [56]

    Z. Li, J. Shen, O. Gerhard, and J. P. Clarke, Gas dynamics in the galaxy: Total mass distribution and the bar pattern speed, The Astrophysical Journal925, 71 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    Olivera-Nieto (H.E.S.S

    L. Olivera-Nieto (H.E.S.S. Collaboration), Resolved gamma-ray emission around the microquasar V4641 Sgr (2025)

    2025

  58. [58]

    Predehlet al., Detection of large-scale X-ray bub- bles in the Milky Way halo, Nature588, 227 (2020), arXiv:2012.05840 [astro-ph.GA]

    P. Predehlet al., Detection of large-scale X-ray bub- bles in the Milky Way halo, Nature588, 227 (2020), arXiv:2012.05840 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    Koldobskiyet al., Energy spectra of secondaries in proton-proton interactions, Phys

    S. Koldobskiyet al., Energy spectra of secondaries in proton-proton interactions, Phys. Rev. D104, 123027 (2021)

    2021

  60. [60]

    Aielloet al.(KM3NeT Collaboration), Astronomy poten- tial of km3net/arca, The European Physical Journal C84, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13137-2 (2024)

    S. Aielloet al.(KM3NeT Collaboration), Astronomy poten- tial of km3net/arca, The European Physical Journal C84, 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13137-2 (2024)

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13137-2 2024

  61. [61]

    Z. P. Ye, F. Hu, W. Tian, Q. C. Chang, Y. L. Chang, Z. S. Cheng,et al., A multi-cubic-kilometre neutrino telescope in the western pacific ocean (2022)

    2022

  62. [62]

    Huang, Z

    T.-Q. Huang, Z. Cao, M. Chen, J. Liu, Z. Wang, X. You, and Y. Qi, Proposal for the high energy neutrino telescope, in Proceedings of 38th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2023), ICRC2023 (Sissa Medialab, 2023) p. 1080

    2023

  63. [63]

    Li, H.-N

    R.-L. Li, H.-N. He, and D.-M. Wei, Search for neutrino emis- sion from lhaaso observed microquasar with icecube 10-year data (2025), arXiv:2510.20687 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Winkleret al., The integral mission, Astronomy & As- trophysics411, L1 (2003)

    C. Winkleret al., The integral mission, Astronomy & As- trophysics411, L1 (2003)

    2003

  65. [65]

    M. S. Tashiroet al., Status of x-ray imaging and spec- troscopy mission (xrism), inSpace Telescopes and Instru- mentation 2020: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray(SPIE, 2020)

    2020

  66. [66]

    Atteia, B

    J.-L. Atteia, B. Cordier, and J. Wei, The svom mis- sion, International Journal of Modern Physics D31, 10.1142/s0218271822300087 (2021)

    doi:10.1142/s0218271822300087 2021

  67. [67]

    Zhanget al., Large array of imaging atmospheric cherenkov telescopes (LACT): status and future plans (2024) p

    S. Zhanget al., Large array of imaging atmospheric cherenkov telescopes (LACT): status and future plans (2024) p. 808

    2024

  68. [68]

    Z. Cao, D. Khangulyan, J. Liu, and R. Liu, Microquasar V4641 Sgr and Its Deep Investigation with LACT as a Super-PeVatron of Cosmic Rays, Research8, 0872 (2025). [69]Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array(WORLD SCI- ENTIFIC, 2018)

    2025

  69. [70]

    E. A. Barsukova, V. P. Goranskij, and P. Kroll, His- torical light curve of the black hole binary V4641 Sgr based on the moscow and sonneberg plate archives (2014), arXiv:1410.2055 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [71]

    in ’t Zand, J

    J. in ’t Zand, J. Heise, A. Bazzano, M. Cocchi, L. D. Ciolo, and J. M. Muller, SAX J1819.3-2525 (1999), iAU Circ., No. 7119

    1999

  71. [72]

    Katoet al., Preoutburst activity of V4641 Sgr = SAX J1819.3-2525: Possible existence of 2.5-day period (1999)

    T. Katoet al., Preoutburst activity of V4641 Sgr = SAX J1819.3-2525: Possible existence of 2.5-day period (1999)

    1999

  72. [73]

    D. A. Smith, A. M. Levine, and E. H. Morgan, V4641 Sagit- tarii, IAU Circular (1999),https://cbat.eps.harvard. edu/iauc/07200/07253.html

    1999

  73. [74]

    Stubbings, V4641 sgr — X-ray binary black hole star system, accessed: 2025-05-16

    R. Stubbings, V4641 sgr — X-ray binary black hole star system, accessed: 2025-05-16

    2025

  74. [75]

    Buxtonet al., (2003), the Astronomer’s Telegram, No

    M. Buxtonet al., (2003), the Astronomer’s Telegram, No. 170

    2003

  75. [76]

    Bailyn, D

    C. Bailyn, D. Maitra, M. Buxton, L. Jeanty, and D. Gonza- lez, (2003), the Astronomer’s Telegram, No. 171

    2003

  76. [77]

    M. P. Rupen, A. J. Mioduszewski, and V. Dhawan, (2003), the Astronomer’s Telegram, No. 172

    2003

  77. [78]

    Swank, X-ray reappearance of v4641 sgr (2004), the As- tronomer’s Telegram, No

    J. Swank, X-ray reappearance of v4641 sgr (2004), the As- tronomer’s Telegram, No. 295. 11

    2004

  78. [79]

    M. P. Rupen, V. Dhawah, and A. J. Mioudzewski, (2004), the Astronomer’s Telegram, No. 296

    2004

  79. [80]

    Bikmaevet al., (2004), the Astronomer’s Telegram, No

    I. Bikmaevet al., (2004), the Astronomer’s Telegram, No. 309

    2004

  80. [81]

    J. H. Swank, E. A. Smith, and C. B. Markwardt, V4641 sgr X-ray activity (2005), the Astronomer’s Telegram, No. 536

    2005

Showing first 80 references.