pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.15203 · v2 · submitted 2025-12-17 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Adhesive tape loops

Krishnan Suryanarayanan , Andrew B. Croll , Harmeet Singh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords adhesive tape loopsKirchhoff rodself-adhesionsoft materialsequilibrium shapesPDMS experimentsoverlap stability
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Kirchhoff rod model predicts the equilibrium shapes and stability boundaries of adhesive tape loops from adhesion strength and overlap.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines adhesive tape loops formed by overlapping the ends of a sticky strip and studies when they stay closed, unravel, or settle into smaller stable overlaps. It introduces a model that treats the tape as an inextensible rod with a single non-dimensional adhesion parameter to calculate loop shapes and identify stable states. Experiments using PDMS sheets confirm that the predicted shapes and equilibrium conditions match observations across different adhesion strengths and overlaps. This framework offers a potential method to determine self-adhesion strength in soft materials by measuring the smallest overlap that maintains equilibrium.

Core claim

Modeling the loop as a uniform inextensible Kirchhoff rod with adhesive interaction captured by one constant strength parameter yields equilibrium configurations whose shapes and stability regions agree with experiments; for given adhesion and overlap the loop either unravels, remains closed, or opens quasi-statically to a smaller stable overlap.

What carries the argument

The non-dimensional adhesion strength together with normalized overlap, inserted into the Kirchhoff rod equilibrium equations to determine closed-loop shapes and the boundaries separating unraveling, stable, and quasi-static adjustment regimes.

If this is right

  • The smallest overlap required for a stable loop directly encodes the adhesion strength.
  • Loop shapes can be computed explicitly from the two control parameters for any stable state.
  • Loops with excessive initial overlap open quasi-statically until they reach the stable smaller overlap.
  • The model distinguishes three regimes: full unraveling, persistent equilibrium, and adjustment to reduced overlap.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same rod-plus-constant-adhesion approach could be tested on other thin self-adhering sheets such as polymer films or biological tapes.
  • Varying tape thickness or material modulus while keeping the non-dimensional adhesion fixed would test whether the single-parameter assumption continues to hold.
  • Dynamic experiments that track the speed of quasi-static opening could reveal whether the model needs rate-dependent terms.

Load-bearing premise

Adhesion strength remains constant and does not depend on local curvature or the tape's bending history.

What would settle it

A measured loop shape or critical overlap value that lies outside the model's predicted range for a calibrated adhesion strength would show the model fails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.15203 by Andrew B. Croll, Harmeet Singh, Krishnan Suryanarayanan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present an experimental and theoretical study of the mechanics of an \emph{adhesive tape loop}, formed by bending a straight rectangular strip with adhesive properties, and prescribing an overlap between the two ends. For a given combination of the adhesive strength and the extent of the overlap, the loop may unravel, it may stay in equilibrium, or open up quasi-statically to settle into an equilibrium with a smaller overlap. We define the state space of an adhesive tape loop with two parameters: a non-dimensional adhesion strength, and the extent of overlap normalized by the total length of the loop. We conduct experiments with adhesive tape loops fabricated out of sheets of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and record their states. We rationalize the experimental observations using a simple scaling argument, followed by a detailed theoretical model based on Kirchhoff rod theory. The predictions made by the theoretical model, namely the shape of the loops and the states corresponding to equilibrium, show good agreement with the experimental data. Our model may potentially be used to deduce the strength of self-adhesion in sticky soft materials by simply measuring the smallest overlap needed to maintain a tape loop in equilibrium.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies adhesive tape loops formed by overlapping the ends of a rectangular adhesive strip. It defines a two-parameter state space (non-dimensional adhesion strength and normalized overlap), performs PDMS experiments to map stable/unstable states, and develops a Kirchhoff-rod model whose predictions for loop shapes and equilibrium boundaries are reported to agree with the data. The model is proposed as a route to infer adhesion strength from the minimal overlap that sustains equilibrium.

Significance. If the claimed quantitative agreement is confirmed with error metrics, the work supplies a simple, low-cost protocol for characterizing self-adhesion in soft materials that leverages standard rod theory and requires only measurement of a single geometric length. The combination of scaling analysis and boundary-value modeling is a clear strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (theoretical model): the non-dimensional adhesion strength is introduced as a single curvature-independent parameter extracted from experiment; however, the equilibrium boundary predictions rest on this constancy, and no check is shown that the fitted value remains consistent across the observed range of peel angles and curvatures in the PDMS loops.
  2. [Results] Results section and abstract: the claim of 'good agreement' between model and experiment is stated without quantitative error metrics, residual plots, or details on how the adhesion parameter is fitted to the data, so the strength of the validation cannot be assessed from the given information.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should list the specific non-dimensional adhesion values and overlap ratios used for each plotted curve so that readers can reproduce the comparison.
  2. [§2] The scaling argument in §2 could be expanded with a short derivation showing how the critical overlap scales with the adhesion parameter.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us identify areas for improvement. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of the model and validation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (theoretical model): the non-dimensional adhesion strength is introduced as a single curvature-independent parameter extracted from experiment; however, the equilibrium boundary predictions rest on this constancy, and no check is shown that the fitted value remains consistent across the observed range of peel angles and curvatures in the PDMS loops.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit check of parameter constancy would strengthen the justification for treating the non-dimensional adhesion strength as curvature-independent. The experimental data in the manuscript span a moderate range of peel angles and curvatures, and the fitted value was obtained from the full dataset. In the revised manuscript we will add a supplementary analysis (new figure or table) that reports the fitted adhesion strength obtained from subsets of the data binned by peel angle or curvature; this will demonstrate that the parameter remains consistent within experimental uncertainty and thereby support the modeling assumption. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section and abstract: the claim of 'good agreement' between model and experiment is stated without quantitative error metrics, residual plots, or details on how the adhesion parameter is fitted to the data, so the strength of the validation cannot be assessed from the given information.

    Authors: We accept that the current wording of 'good agreement' lacks the quantitative support needed for rigorous assessment. In the revision we will (i) expand the description of the fitting procedure used to extract the non-dimensional adhesion strength from the experimental equilibrium boundaries, (ii) report quantitative error metrics (e.g., root-mean-square deviation between predicted and measured loop shapes and between predicted and observed critical overlaps), and (iii) include a brief residual analysis or supplementary plot. These additions will be reflected in both the Results section and a revised abstract statement. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard Kirchhoff rod model applied to new BVP with externally calibrated adhesion parameter

full rationale

The derivation begins from the standard Kirchhoff rod equations (inextensible, uniform rod with bending and adhesion energy terms) and imposes boundary conditions for the overlapped loop geometry. A single non-dimensional adhesion strength parameter is introduced and its value is obtained by matching the model's predicted equilibrium boundaries to the experimental state diagram; once fixed, the same equations are solved to generate loop shapes and state predictions that are compared to independent measurements. No step reduces to a self-definition, a fitted quantity renamed as a prediction, or a self-citation chain; the central results remain independent of the input data once the parameter is set. This is the normal, non-circular outcome for a mechanics paper that introduces a new boundary-value problem on top of established rod theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim depends on standard assumptions of Kirchhoff rod theory plus one fitted non-dimensional adhesion parameter; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • non-dimensional adhesion strength
    Single parameter that combines adhesive energy per area with bending stiffness; its value is determined by matching model to observed minimum stable overlap.
axioms (1)
  • standard math Kirchhoff rod theory for inextensible, unshearable rods with bending and twisting moments
    Invoked for the detailed theoretical model of loop shape and equilibrium.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5497 in / 1300 out tokens · 52330 ms · 2026-05-16T21:51:56.404827+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The predictions made by the theoretical model, namely the shape of the loops and the states corresponding to equilibrium, show good agreement with the experimental data. Our model may potentially be used to deduce the strength of self-adhesion in sticky soft materials by simply measuring the smallest overlap needed to maintain a tape loop in equilibrium.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We rationalize the experimental observations using a simple scaling argument, followed by a detailed theoretical model based on Kirchhoff rod theory.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K. Kendall. Thin-film peeling-the elastic term.Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 8(13):1449, 1975

    work page 1975

  2. [2]

    A. N. Gent and G. R. Hamed. Peel mechanics for an elastic-plastic adherend.Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 21(10):2817–2831, 1977

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    W. J. Bottega. Peeling and bond-point propagation in a self-adhered elastica.The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, 44(1):17–33, 1991

    work page 1991

  4. [4]

    K. L. Johnson, K. Kendall, and A. D. Roberts. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids.Proceedings of the royal society of London. A. mathematical and physical sciences, 324(1558):301–313, 1971

    work page 1971

  5. [5]

    M. P. De Boer and T. A. Michalske. Accurate method for determining adhesion of cantilever beams.Journal of applied physics, 86(2):817–827, 1999

    work page 1999

  6. [6]

    She and M

    H. She and M. K. Chaudhury. Estimation of adhesion hysteresis using rolling contact mechanics.Langmuir, 16(2):622–625, 2000

    work page 2000

  7. [7]

    Ghatak, L

    A. Ghatak, L. Mahadevan, and M. K. Chaudhury. Measuring the work of adhesion between a soft confined film and a flexible plate.Langmuir, 21(4):1277–1281, 2005

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    N. J. Glassmaker and C. Y. Hui. Elastica solution for a nanotube formed by self-adhesion of a folded thin film.Journal of Applied Physics, 96(6):3429–3434, 2004

    work page 2004

  9. [9]

    Vella, J

    D. Vella, J. Bico, A. Boudaoud, B. Roman, and P. M. Reis. The macroscopic delamination of thin films from elastic substrates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(27):10901–10906, 2009

    work page 2009

  10. [10]

    Majidi and G

    C. Majidi and G. G. Adams. Adhesion and delamination boundary conditions for elastic plates with arbitrary contact shape.Mechanics Research Communications, 37(2):214–218, 2010

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    T. J. S. Wilting, M. H. Essink, H. Gelderblom, and J. H. Snoeijer. How to unloop a self-adherent sheet.Europhysics Letters, 134(5):56001, 2021

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    G. S. Watson, D. W. Green, L. Schwarzkopf, X. Li, B. W. Cribb, S. Myhra, and J. A. Watson. A gecko skin micro/nano structure–a low adhesion, superhydrophobic, anti-wetting, self-cleaning, biocompatible, antibacterial surface.Acta bioma- terialia, 21:109–122, 2015

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    A. Y. Stark, M. R. Klittich, M. Sitti, P. H. Niewiarowski, and A. Dhinojwala. The effect of temperature and humidity on adhesion of a gecko-inspired adhesive: implications for the natural system.Scientific reports, 6(1):30936, 2016

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    H. Yuk, C. E. Varela, C. S. Nabzdyk, X. Mao, R. F. Padera, E. T. Roche, and X. Zhao. Dry double-sided tape for adhesion of wet tissues and devices.Nature, 575:169–174, 2019. 14

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Fessel, J

    G. Fessel, J. G. Broughton, N. A. Fellows, J. F. Durodola, and A. R. Hutchinson. Evaluation of different lap-shear joint geometries for automotive applications.International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 27(7):574–583, 2007

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    Grujicic, V

    M. Grujicic, V. Sellappan, M. A. Omar, N. Seyr, A. Obieglo, M. Erdmann, and J. Holzleitner. An overview of the polymer- to-metal direct-adhesion hybrid technologies for load-bearing automotive components.Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 197(1):363–373, 2008

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    Boutar, S

    Y. Boutar, S. Naïmi, S. Mezlini, L. F. M. da Silva, M. Hamdaoui, and M. Ben Sik Ali. Effect of adhesive thickness and surface roughness on the shear strength of aluminium one-component polyurethane adhesive single-lap joints for automotive applications.Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 30(17):1913–1929, 2016

    work page 1913

  18. [18]

    C. B. Vick. Adhesive bonding of wood materials.Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. Madison, WI: USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, 1999. General technical report FPL; GTR-113: Pages 9.1-9.24, 113, 1999

    work page 1999

  19. [19]

    Ciupack, H

    Y. Ciupack, H. Pasternak, C. Mette, E. Stammen, and K. Dilger. Adhesive bonding in steel construction-challenge and innovation.Procedia Engineering, 172:186–193, 2017

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Lejars, A

    M. Lejars, A. Margaillan, and C. Bressy. Fouling release coatings: a nontoxic alternative to biocidal antifouling coatings. Chemical reviews, 112(8):4347–4390, 2012

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    Dhyani, J

    A. Dhyani, J. Wang, A. K. Halvey, B. Macdonald, G. Mehta, and A. Tuteja. Design and applications of surfaces that control the accretion of matter.Science, 373(6552):eaba5010, 2021

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Autumn and A

    K. Autumn and A. M. Peattie. Mechanisms of adhesion in geckos.Integrative and comparative biology, 42(6):1081–1090, 2002

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    E. Arzt, S. Gorb, and R. Spolenak. From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19):10603–10606, 2003

    work page 2003

  24. [24]

    L. Qu, L. Dai, M. Stone, Z. Xia, and Z. L. Wang. Carbon nanotube arrays with strong shear binding-on and easy normal lifting-off.Science, 322(5899):238–242, 2008

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    Kamperman, E

    M. Kamperman, E. Kroner, A. Del Campo, R. M. McMeeking, and E. Arzt. Functional adhesive surfaces with “gecko” effect: The concept of contact splitting.Advanced Engineering Materials, 12(5):335–348, 2010

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    S. Kim, M. Spenko, S. Trujillo, B. Heyneman, D. Santos, and M. R. Cutkosky. Smooth vertical surface climbing with directional adhesion.IEEE Transactions on robotics, 24(1):65–74, 2008

    work page 2008

  27. [27]

    L. Ge, S. Sethi, L. Ci, P. M. Ajayan, and A. Dhinojwala. Carbon nanotube-based synthetic gecko tapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(26):10792–10795, 2007

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    Majidi and G

    C. Majidi and G. G. Adams. A simplified formulation of adhesion problems with elastic plates.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 465(2107):2217–2230, 2009

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    Ponce, J

    S. Ponce, J. Bico, and B. Roman. Effect of friction on the peeling test at zero-degrees.Soft matter, 11(48):9281–9290, 2015

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    J. A. Hanna, H. Singh, and E. G. Virga. Partial constraint singularities in elastic rods.Journal of Elasticity, 133(1):105– –118, 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Elder, T

    T. Elder, T. Twohig, H. Singh, and A. B. Croll. Adhesion of a tape loop.Soft Matter, 16(47):10611–10619, 2020

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    D Bartlett, S

    M. D Bartlett, S. W Case, A. J Kinloch, and D. A Dillard. Peel tests for quantifying adhesion and toughness: A review. Progress in Materials Science, 137:101086, 2023

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    R. Xie, F. Han, Q. Yu, D. Li, X. Han, X. Xu, H. Yu, J. Huang, X. Zhou, H. Zhao, et al. A movable long-term implantable soft microfibre for dynamic bioelectronics.Nature, 645(8081):648–655, 2025

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Khatib, E

    M. Khatib, E. T. Zhao, S. Wei, J. Park, A. Abramson, E. S. Bishop, A. L. Thomas, C. H. Chen, P. Emengo, C. Xu, et al. High-density soft bioelectronic fibres for multimodal sensing and stimulation.Nature, 645(8081):656–664, 2025

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Maugis and M

    D. Maugis and M. Barquins. Fracture mechanics and the adherence of viscoelastic bodies.Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 11(14):1989, 1978

    work page 1989

  36. [36]

    A. J. Kinloch, C. C. Lau, and J. G. Williams. The peeling of flexible laminates.International Journal of Fracture, 66(1):45–70, 1994

    work page 1994

  37. [37]

    C. Majidi. Remarks on formulating an adhesion problem using Euler’s elastica (draft).Mechanics Research Communica- tions, 34(1):85–90, 2007

    work page 2007

  38. [38]

    Burridge and J

    R. Burridge and J. B. Keller. Peeling, slipping and cracking–some one-dimensional free-boundary problems in mechanics. SIAM Review, 20(1):31–61, 1978

    work page 1978

  39. [39]

    Twohig, R

    T. Twohig, R. Tutika, W. Zu, M. D. Bartlett, and A. B. Croll. Kuttsukigami: sticky sheet design.Soft Matter, 20(12):2711– 2719, 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    T. J. W. Wagner and D. Vella. The ‘sticky elastica’: delamination blisters beyond small deformations.Soft Matter, 9(4):1025–1030, 2013

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    C. Py, P. Reverdy, L. Doppler, J. Bico, B. Roman, and C. N. Baroud. Capillary origami: Spontaneous wrapping of a droplet with an elastic sheet.Physical Review Letters, 98(15):156103, 2007

    work page 2007

  42. [42]

    K. R. VanDonselaar, D. A. Bellido-Aguilar, M. Safaripour, H. Kim, J. J. Watkins, A. J. Crosby, D. C. Webster, and A. B. Croll. Silicone elastomers and the persson-brener adhesion model.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 159(18):184708, 2023

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    S. S. Antman.Nonlinear Problems of Elasticity. Springer, New York, 1995

    work page 1995

  44. [44]

    J. H. Maddocks and D. J. Dichmann. Conservation laws in the dynamics of rods.Journal of Elasticity, 34:83–96, 1994

    work page 1994

  45. [45]

    O. M. O’Reilly.Modeling Nonlinear Problems in the Mechanics of Strings and Rods. Springer, New York, 2017

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    H. Singh. Planar equilibria of an elastic rod wrapped around a circular capstan.Journal of Elasticity, 151(2):321–346, 2022

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Neukirch and F

    S. Neukirch and F. Bertails-Descoubes. A Noetherian approach to invariants for the statics and dynamics of elastic rods. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 2025. 15

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    E. L. Starostin and G. H. M. van der Heijden. Theory of equilibria of elastic 2-braids with interstrand interaction.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 64:83–132, 2014

    work page 2014

  49. [49]

    Gelfand, S.V

    I.M. Gelfand, S.V. Fomin, and R.A. Silverman.Calculus of Variations. Dover Books on Mathematics. Dover Publications, New York, 2000

    work page 2000