pith. sign in

arxiv: 2512.16669 · v3 · submitted 2025-12-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Photoinduced phase heterogeneity and charge localization in SnSe

Benjamin J. Dringoli , Stefano Mocatti , Giovanni Marini , Zhongzhen Luo , Matteo Calandra , Mercouri G. Kanatzidis , David G. Cooke This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 21:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords SnSephotoinduced phase transitionterahertz spectroscopyphase heterogeneitycharge localizationultrafast dynamicssemi-metallic domains
0
0 comments X

The pith

Photoexcitation nucleates higher-symmetry semi-metallic domains in SnSe within 200 fs, creating phase heterogeneity that localizes carriers.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The study uses time-resolved multi-terahertz spectroscopy to track how intense light pulses alter the optical conductivity of SnSe across 0.5 to 11 THz. At low fluences a standard Drude response appears with phonons from the equilibrium Pnma structure, but above roughly 3 mJ/cm^{2} the DC conductivity drops sharply while phonon spectra develop a new mode near 3 THz and a high-frequency Lorentzian component. These spectral changes are interpreted as the rapid formation of domains belonging to a higher-symmetry semi-metallic phase inside the original lattice. The domains appear non-thermally within 200 fs and produce phase disorder that interrupts long-range charge motion. The high-frequency Lorentzian decays over 90 ps, leaving a heterogeneous state whose electronic properties differ from both pure phases.

Core claim

Time-resolved multi-terahertz spectroscopy reveals pump-fluence-dependent dynamics in the optical conductivity of photoexcited SnSe. Below 3 mJ/cm^{2} a free-carrier Drude spectrum coexists with equilibrium Pnma phonons. At higher fluences the DC photoconductivity is suppressed, the B^{2}_{1}u mode shifts and narrows, and a new mode emerges at ~3.0 THz. At intermediate fluences (~3.1 mJ/cm^{2}) an additional high-frequency Lorentzian component appears that redshifts after 2 ps and decays exponentially on a 90 ps timescale. Experimental spectra together with theoretical calculations indicate non-thermal nucleation of higher-symmetry semi-metallic phase domains within 200 fs.

What carries the argument

Nucleation of higher-symmetry semi-metallic phase domains inside the Pnma matrix, detected through emergence of a ~3.0 THz phonon mode, suppression of the Drude response, and transient high-frequency Lorentzian conductivity that signals phase heterogeneity.

If this is right

  • Long-range charge transport is interrupted above a fluence threshold of ~3 mJ/cm^{2} due to phase disorder.
  • The B^{2}_{1}u phonon mode shifts in frequency and narrows while a new mode appears at ~3.0 THz, indicating a structural transition to higher symmetry.
  • A transient high-frequency Lorentzian component emerges at intermediate fluences and decays over 90 ps, consistent with evolving phase heterogeneity.
  • The phase change occurs non-thermally within 200 fs, faster than lattice thermalization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The transient semi-metallic domains could be exploited to create ultrafast optical switches that toggle between localized and conducting states in layered chalcogenides.
  • Similar photo-induced heterogeneity may appear in isostructural compounds such as SnS, offering a route to engineer domain-wall conductivity without permanent structural damage.
  • Mapping the spatial distribution of the new phase domains with nanoscale probes would test whether the observed conductivity suppression scales with domain size or density.
  • The 200 fs nucleation timescale suggests the process could be driven by coherent phonon excitation rather than diffusive carrier heating, opening the possibility of selective mode excitation to control phase fractions.

Load-bearing premise

The new 3.0 THz mode and high-frequency Lorentzian component are assumed to arise from nucleation of a higher-symmetry phase rather than from defects, carrier localization without structural change, or artifacts in the conductivity model.

What would settle it

A time-resolved THz measurement at high fluence that shows neither a new mode near 3 THz nor suppression of DC conductivity, or that demonstrates all spectral changes are consistent with purely thermal heating, would falsify the claim of non-thermal photo-induced phase nucleation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.16669 by Benjamin J. Dringoli, David G. Cooke, Giovanni Marini, Matteo Calandra, Mercouri G. Kanatzidis, Stefano Mocatti, Zhongzhen Luo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (c) shows an example |T˜(ω, tpp)| map at a pump [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Real (solid symbols) and imaginary (hollow symbols) components of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Carrier density calculated from the fitted Drude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Fitted ω0 dynamics for the (a) 2.4 THz B1 1u and (b) B2 1u 3.7 THz modes. Strong blueshifting is seen with in￾creasing fluence for the B2 1u-centered feature, but only minor blueshifting is seen for the B1 1u feature. The blueshifting fol￾lows similar dynamics to the other fitted regions, supporting strong interactions between lattice modes and excited carriers. also demonstrates dynamics. At F ≤ 1.3 mJ/cm… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Spectral functions for P nma (ground state and photoexcited), Immm (photoexcited), Fm¯3m (photoexcited) restricted to the IR active B1u modes. (b) Spectral function restricted to the IR active B1u modes of the P nma (ground state) and after photoexcitation at short and long times. These plots assume a P nma → Immm → Fm¯3m partial phase transition pathway. Note the additional features in the 3.0-3.5 THz… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Plasmonic region fitted Lorentzian (a) plasma fre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a-d) Fit residuals for small pump-probe delays at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) TRTS experiment with pump active, contributing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Simulated (a) real and (b) imaginary parts of the optical conductivity including a Drude-Smith intra-band component [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Fluence-dependent complex conductivity σ(ω, F, tpp), σ1 black and σ2 red, for pump-probe delays of 0.5 ps (left) and 3.0 ps (right). Suppression of the zero-frequency conductivity is seen with increasing fluence at both pump probe delays. The 3.0 ps data also demonstrates the B2 1u response narrowing with increasing fluence at slightly later pump delays. Such narrowing is not yet observed at tpp = 0.5 ps. … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Selected fits and extracted data showing the poor linewidth fitting results, particularly for the (a) 1.3 and (b) 7.5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dirac interband conductivity as a function of temperature. The trend to wider, more spread-out features with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Atomic force microscopy image with line cuts showing exfoliated SnSe on the diamond substrate. (b) Plotted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Time-resolved multi-terahertz (THz) spectroscopy is used to observe pump fluence-dependent dynamics in the optical conductivity of photoexcited tin selenide (SnSe) over an ultrabroadband spectral range of 0.5 - 11 THz at fluences from 0.1 - 7.5 mJ/cm$^2$. A free carrier Drude spectrum is observed at pump fluences below 3 mJ/cm$^2$, with optical phonons well described by the equilibrium Pnma structural phase. With increasing fluence, a suppression of the DC photoconductivity is observed, indicating an interruption of long range transport due to phase disorder. Concomitantly, the optical phonons exhibit features that can no longer be explained by a pure Pnma phase, with a frequency shift and narrowing of the $B^2_{1u}$ mode and a new mode appearing at $\sim$3.0 THz consistent with a transition to a higher-symmetry structure. At an intermediate fluence of 3.1 mJ/cm$^2$, a high frequency Lorentzian component consistent with phase heterogeneity appears that rapidly redshifts after 2 ps and whose amplitude exponentially decays on a 90 ps time scale. Our experimental measurements and theoretical calculations provide evidence for a non-thermal, photo-induced nucleation of higher symmetry, semi-metallic phase domains in SnSe appearing within 200 fs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses time-resolved multi-THz spectroscopy (0.5-11 THz) on SnSe to track fluence-dependent (0.1-7.5 mJ/cm²) changes in optical conductivity. Below ~3 mJ/cm² a Drude response plus equilibrium Pnma phonons is reported; above this threshold DC conductivity is suppressed, the B²_{1u} phonon shifts and narrows, a new ~3.0 THz mode appears, and at 3.1 mJ/cm² a transient high-frequency Lorentzian emerges whose amplitude decays on a ~90 ps scale. These features, together with theoretical phonon calculations, are interpreted as evidence for non-thermal, photo-induced nucleation of higher-symmetry semi-metallic phase domains within 200 fs.

Significance. If the central assignment of the new mode and Lorentzian component to a distinct higher-symmetry phase holds, the work would demonstrate ultrafast, non-thermal structural heterogeneity in a layered thermoelectric material, with implications for light-controlled phase engineering. The broadband THz approach that simultaneously resolves carrier and phonon dynamics is a methodological strength, as is the inclusion of supporting theoretical calculations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Results (fluence-dependent spectra)] The assignment of the new ~3.0 THz mode and the high-frequency Lorentzian at 3.1 mJ/cm² specifically to nucleation of a higher-symmetry phase (rather than defects, carrier localization, or multi-component fitting artifacts) is load-bearing for the central claim. The abstract states consistency with theory but provides no quantitative frequency matching between the observed 3.0 THz feature and calculated phonons of the proposed higher-symmetry structure, nor any explicit model-comparison tests that rule out alternative Drude-Lorentz parameterizations without structural change.
  2. [Time-resolved analysis / Data fitting] The 200 fs appearance time, the ~3 mJ/cm² fluence threshold for heterogeneity, and the 90 ps decay constant are extracted from time-resolved data, yet the manuscript does not detail the fitting procedure, baseline subtraction, or how post-hoc model choices affect these values. Without reported uncertainties or robustness checks, it is unclear whether the claimed non-thermal character and phase-disorder interpretation are robust.
  3. [Results (conductivity suppression)] Suppression of DC photoconductivity is interpreted as interruption of long-range transport due to phase disorder. This interpretation would be strengthened by showing that the observed conductivity spectra cannot be reproduced by equilibrium Pnma phonons plus fluence-dependent carrier scattering or localization terms alone.
minor comments (2)
  1. Ensure all figures display error bars on extracted parameters (frequencies, amplitudes, time constants) and clearly label fluence values and pump-probe delays.
  2. Standardize notation for the B²_{1u} phonon mode between the abstract and main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and robustness of the manuscript. We address each major comment below and have made revisions to incorporate the suggested additions and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results (fluence-dependent spectra)] The assignment of the new ~3.0 THz mode and the high-frequency Lorentzian at 3.1 mJ/cm² specifically to nucleation of a higher-symmetry phase (rather than defects, carrier localization, or multi-component fitting artifacts) is load-bearing for the central claim. The abstract states consistency with theory but provides no quantitative frequency matching between the observed 3.0 THz feature and calculated phonons of the proposed higher-symmetry structure, nor any explicit model-comparison tests that rule out alternative Drude-Lorentz parameterizations without structural change.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative frequency matching and explicit model-comparison tests would strengthen the central claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a supplementary table directly comparing the observed ~3.0 THz mode to the calculated phonon frequencies of the higher-symmetry Cmcm structure (agreement within 0.2 THz). We have also included chi-squared comparisons of alternative Drude-Lorentz fits that exclude the structural phase change, showing that models without the new phase yield significantly poorer fits to both the phonon region and the high-frequency Lorentzian. The abstract has been updated to reference this quantitative agreement. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Time-resolved analysis / Data fitting] The 200 fs appearance time, the ~3 mJ/cm² fluence threshold for heterogeneity, and the 90 ps decay constant are extracted from time-resolved data, yet the manuscript does not detail the fitting procedure, baseline subtraction, or how post-hoc model choices affect these values. Without reported uncertainties or robustness checks, it is unclear whether the claimed non-thermal character and phase-disorder interpretation are robust.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the fitting details were insufficiently described. The revised Methods section now provides a full description of the global fitting routine, baseline subtraction protocol, and model-selection criteria. We report uncertainties on the extracted 200 fs appearance time, ~3 mJ/cm² threshold, and 90 ps decay constant, obtained from the covariance matrix of the fits. Additional robustness tests (varying fitting windows and initial parameters) have been added, confirming that these values remain stable within 10 %. These revisions support the non-thermal and phase-disorder interpretations. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results (conductivity suppression)] Suppression of DC photoconductivity is interpreted as interruption of long-range transport due to phase disorder. This interpretation would be strengthened by showing that the observed conductivity spectra cannot be reproduced by equilibrium Pnma phonons plus fluence-dependent carrier scattering or localization terms alone.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit comparison to alternative models would strengthen the interpretation. We have added a new figure in the revised manuscript that overlays the measured high-fluence conductivity spectra with fits using only equilibrium Pnma phonons plus a fluence-dependent Drude term that incorporates increased scattering or a localization Lorentzian. These alternative models cannot simultaneously reproduce the DC suppression and the new phonon features, whereas inclusion of the higher-symmetry phase domains yields a consistent description across the fluence range. This supports our phase-disorder interpretation of the conductivity suppression. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central claim rests on independent experimental spectra and external phonon calculations

full rationale

The paper interprets time-resolved THz conductivity data using standard Drude-Lorentz models and compares the new ~3.0 THz mode and B1u shifts to equilibrium Pnma phonon calculations from theory. No equation reduces an observed feature to a quantity defined by the same fit, no parameter is fitted on a subset and then relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing premise collapses to a self-citation chain. The assignment of spectral features to higher-symmetry domains is an interpretive step, not a self-definitional or fitted-input reduction, leaving the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard conductivity models plus one interpretive postulate; no machine-checked proofs or shipped code are mentioned.

free parameters (1)
  • fluence threshold for heterogeneity
    Observed crossover near 3 mJ/cm² used to separate regimes; value is data-driven rather than derived from first principles.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Drude model accurately describes free-carrier response below 3 mJ/cm²
    Invoked to fit low-fluence spectra and extract DC conductivity suppression.
  • domain assumption Pnma phonon frequencies are known from equilibrium calculations
    Used as baseline to identify deviations at high fluence.
invented entities (1)
  • higher-symmetry semi-metallic phase domains no independent evidence
    purpose: Explains new 3 THz mode, Lorentzian component, and suppressed long-range transport
    Postulated to account for spectral features; no independent falsifiable signature (e.g., specific diffraction peak) is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5575 in / 1543 out tokens · 36518 ms · 2026-05-16T21:19:40.582664+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    This dynamic narrowing with increasing fluence is counter to the general expectation that phonon features broaden as excited photocarriers transfer their energy to the lattice [57]

    At higher fluences, however, the phonon feature is seen to narrow considerably upon photoexcitation, which can be directly observed from the transmission map in Figure 1(e). This dynamic narrowing with increasing fluence is counter to the general expectation that phonon features broaden as excited photocarriers transfer their energy to the lattice [57]. W...

    work page

  2. [2]

    L. D. Zhao, S. H. Lo, Y. S. Zhang, H. Sun, G. J. Tan, C. Uher, C. Wolverton, V. P. Dravid, and M. G. Kanatzidis, Nature508, 373 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Chang, G

    C. Chang, G. J. Tan, J. Q. He, M. G. Kanatzidis, and L. D. Zhao, Chem. Mater.30, 7355 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    M. M. Alsalama, H. Hamoudi, A. Abdala, Z. K. Ghouri, and K. M. Youssef, Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci.59, 371 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Tayari, B

    V. Tayari, B. Senkovskiy, D. Rybkovskiy, N. Ehlen, A. Fe- dorov, C.-Y. Chen, J. Avila, M. Asensio, A. Perucchi, and P. Di Pietro, Phys. Rev. B97, 045424 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Carrete, N

    J. Carrete, N. Mingo, and S. Curtarolo, Appl. Phys Lett. 105, 101907 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    J. M. Skelton, L. A. Burton, S. C. Parker, A. Walsh, C.- E. Kim, A. Soon, J. Buckeridge, A. A. Sokol, C. R. A. Catlow, A. Togo, and I. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 075502 (2016). 10

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Aseginolaza, R

    U. Aseginolaza, R. Bianco, L. Monacelli, L. Paulatto, M. Calandra, F. Mauri, A. Bergara, and I. Errea, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 075901 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    C. W. Li, J. Hong, A. F. May, D. Bansal, S. Chi, T. Hong, G. Ehlers, and O. Delaire, Nat. Phys.11, 1063 (2015)

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Hong and O

    J. Hong and O. Delaire, Mater. Today Phys.10, 100093 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    J. L. Ma, Y. N. Chen, and W. Li, Phys. Rev. B97, 205207 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Caruso, M

    F. Caruso, M. Troppenz, S. Rigamonti, and C. Draxl, Phys. Rev. B99, 081104 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    J. M. Skelton, L. A. Burton, S. C. Parker, A. Walsh, C. E. Kim, A. Soon, J. Buckeridge, A. A. Sokol, C. R. A. Catlow, A. Togo, and I. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 075502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Bansal, J

    D. Bansal, J. W. Hong, C. W. Li, A. F. May, W. Porter, M. Y. Hu, D. L. Abernathy, and O. Delaire, Phys. Rev. B94, 054307 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Lanigan-Atkins, S

    T. Lanigan-Atkins, S. Yang, J. L. Niedziela, D. Bansal, A.F.May, A.A.Puretzky, J.Y.Y.Lin, D.M.Pajerowski, T. Hong, S. Chi, G. Ehlers, and O. Delaire, Nat. Com- mun.11, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Chollet, D

    Y.Huang, S.Teitelbaum, S.Yang, G.DelaPeña, T.Sato, M. Chollet, D. Zhu, J. L. Niedziela, D. Bansal, A. F. May, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 156902 (2023)

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    A. Das, A. Kumar, and P. Banerji, J. Phys. Condens. Matter32, 265502 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    R. Q. Guo, X. J. Wang, Y. D. Kuang, and B. L. Huang, Phys. Rev. B92, 115202 (2015)

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    Maeda, K

    M. Maeda, K. Yamamoto, T. Mizokawa, N. L. Saini, M. Arita, H. Namatame, M. Taniguchi, G. Tan, L. D. Zhao, and M. G. Kanatzidis, Phys. Rev. B97, 121110 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    J. J. Yan, F. Ke, C. L. Liu, L. Wang, Q. L. Wang, J. K. Zhang, G. H. Li, Y. H. Han, Y. Z. Ma, and C. X. Gao, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.18, 5012 (2016)

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    L.-D. Zhao, G. Tan, S. Hao, J. He, Y. Pei, H. Chi, H. Wang, S. Gong, H. Xu, and V. P. Dravid, Science 351, 141 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Efthimiopoulos, M

    I. Efthimiopoulos, M. Berg, A. Bande, L. Puskar, E. Rit- ter, W. Xu, A. Marcelli, M. Ortolani, M. Harms, J. Muller, S. Speziale, M. Koch-Muller, Y. Liu, L. D. Zhao, and U. Schade, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.21, 8663 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Biesner, W

    T. Biesner, W. Li, A. A. Tsirlin, S. Roh, P.-C. Wei, E. Uykur, and M. Dressel, NPG Asia Mater.13, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    M. S. Gusmao, C. Mota, A. Ghosh, and H. O. Frota, Comput. Mater. Sci.152, 243 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Nishimura, H

    T. Nishimura, H. Sakai, H. Mori, K. Akiba, H. Usui, M. Ochi, K. Kuroki, A. Miyake, M. Tokunaga, Y. Uwa- toko, K. Katayama, H. Murakawa, and N. Hanasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 226601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    S. Pal, R. Arora, S. Roychowdhury, L. Harnagea, K. Saurabh, S. Shenoy, D. V. S. Muthu, K. Biswas, U. V. Waghmare, and A. K. Sood, Phys. Rev. B101, 155202 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Y. Han, J. Yu, H. Zhang, F. Xu, K. Peng, X. Zhou, L. Qiao, O. V. Misochko, K. G. Nakamura, and G. M. Vanacore, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.13, 442 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Chollet, D

    Y.Huang, S.Yang, S.Teitelbaum, G.DelaPeña, T.Sato, M. Chollet, D. Zhu, J. L. Niedziela, D. Bansal, A. F. May, A. M. Lindenberg, O. Delaire, D. A. Reis, and M. Trigo, Phys. Rev. X12, 011029 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    W. Wang, L. Wu, J. Li, N. Aryal, X. Jin, Y. Liu, M. Fe- durin, M. Babzien, R. Kupfer, and M. Palmer, npj Quan- tum Mater.6, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    B. J. Dringoli, M. Sutton, Z. Luo, M. G. Kanatzidis, and D. G. Cooke, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 146901 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    M. Mogi, D. Choi, K. H. Oh, D. Golovanova, Y. Zhao, Y. Su, Z. Shen, D. Azoury, H. Xia, B. Ilyas,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14800 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Mocatti, G

    S. Mocatti, G. Marini, and M. Calandra, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.14, 9329 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    P. U. Jepsen, D. G. Cooke, and M. Koch, Laser Photonics Rev.5, 124 (2011)

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    K.-Y. Kim, J. H. Glownia, A. J. Taylor, and G. Ro- driguez, Opt. Express15, 4577 (2007)

    work page 2007

  35. [35]

    J. Dai, X. Xie, and X.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 103903 (2006)

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    D’Angelo, H

    F. D’Angelo, H. Němec, S. H. Parekh, P. Kužel, M. Bonn, and D. Turchinovich, Opt. Express24, 10157 (2016)

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    I.-C. Ho, X. Guo, and X.-C. Zhang, Opt. Express18, 2872 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    L. P. René de Cotret, M. R. Otto, J.-H. Pöhls, Z. Luo, M. G. Kanatzidis, and B. J. Siwick, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.119, e2113967119 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    T.Chattopadhyay, J.Pannetier, andH.G.Vonschnering, J. Phys. Chem. Solids47, 879 (1986)

    work page 1986

  40. [40]

    F. A. Hegmann and K. P. Lui, inUltrafast Phenomena in Semiconductors VI, Vol. 4643 (SPIE, 2002) pp. 31–41

    work page 2002

  41. [41]

    Makinistian and E

    L. Makinistian and E. A. Albanesi, Phys. Status Solidi B 246, 183 (2009)

    work page 2009

  42. [42]

    N. V. Smith, Phys. Rev. B64, 155106 (2001)

    work page 2001

  43. [43]

    D. G. Cooke, A. N. MacDonald, A. Hryciw, J. Wang, Q. Li, A. Meldrum, and F. A. Hegmann, Phys. Rev. B 73, 193311 (2006)

    work page 2006

  44. [44]

    T. L. Cocker, D. Baillie, M. Buruma, L. V. Titova, R. D. Sydora, F. Marsiglio, and F. A. Hegmann, Phys. Rev. B 96, 205439 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Walther, D

    M. Walther, D. G. Cooke, C. Sherstan, M. Hajar, M. R. Freeman, and F. A. Hegmann, Phys. Rev. B76, 125408 (2007)

    work page 2007

  46. [46]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fab- ris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougous- sis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S...

    work page 2009

  47. [47]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, 11 S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerst- mann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawamura, H.- Y. Ko, A. Kokalj, E...

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. B88, 085117 (2013)

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    work page 1996

  50. [50]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, J. Chem. Phys.132, 154104 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3382344

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3382344 2010

  51. [51]

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Phys. Rev. B13, 5188 (1976)

    work page 1976

  52. [52]

    Marini and M

    G. Marini and M. Calandra, Phys. Rev. B104, 144103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [53]

    Marzari, D

    N. Marzari, D. Vanderbilt, A. De Vita, and M. C. Payne, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 3296 (1999)

    work page 1999

  54. [54]

    Monacelli, R

    L. Monacelli, R. Bianco, M. Cherubini, M. Calandra, I. Errea, and F. Mauri, J. Phys. Condens. Matter33, 363001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    X. Zhou, F. Deng, Y. Gao, Y. Wu, Y. Chan, S. Li, N. Wang, J. Liu, and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B112, L161107 (2025)

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    G. S. Shi and E. Kioupakis, J. Appl. Phys.117, 065103 (2015)

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    L. D. Zhao, C. Chang, G. J. Tan, and M. G. Kanatzidis, Energy Environ. Sci.9, 3044 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    X. Tang, C. W. Li, and B. Fultz, Phys. Rev. B82, 184301 (2010)

    work page 2010

  59. [59]

    Y. Lu, F.W. Zheng, Y.Yang, P.Zhang, andD. B.Zhang, Phys. Rev. B100, 054304 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Kužel and H

    P. Kužel and H. Němec, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.47, 374005 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    H. J. Joyce, J. L. Boland, C. L. Davies, S. A. Baig, and M. B. Johnston, Semicond. Sci. Tech.31, 103003 (2016)

    work page 2016

  62. [62]

    D. J. Bergman, Phys. Rep.43, 377 (1978)

    work page 1978

  63. [63]

    Z. Li, E. A. Henriksen, Z. Jiang, Z. Hao, M. C. Martin, P. Kim, H. L. Stormer, and D. N. Basov, Nat. Phys.4, 532 (2008)

    work page 2008

  64. [64]

    Neubauer, J

    D. Neubauer, J. P. Carbotte, A. Nateprov, A. Löhle, M. Dressel, and A. Pronin, Phys. Rev. B93, 121202 (2016)

    work page 2016

  65. [65]

    Horng, C.-F

    J. Horng, C.-F. Chen, B. Geng, C. Girit, Y. Zhang, Z. Hao, H. A. Bechtel, M. Martin, A. Zettl, M. F. Crom- mie,et al., Phys. Rev. B83, 165113 (2011)

    work page 2011

  66. [67]

    Cocker, V

    T. Cocker, V. Jelic, R. Hillenbrand, and F. Hegmann, Nat. Photon.15, 558 (2021). Photoinduced phase heterogeneity and charge localization in SnSe: Supplemental Information Benjamin J. Dringoli and David G. Cooke∗ Department of Physics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A2T8 Stefano Mocatti, Giovanni Marini, and Matteo Calandra Department of Physic...

    work page 2021

  67. [68]

    Multiple line cuts show an average film thickness of approximately 500 nm. This measurement was performed on the diamond substrate used for THz spectroscopy measurements after exfoliation and transfer from the bulk crystal, and so is identical to what is measured in the THz experiments. (a) (b) Figure 6. (a) Atomic force microscopy image with line cuts sh...

    work page

  68. [69]

    L. A. Falkovsky and S. S. Pershoguba, Phys. Rev. B76, 153410 (2007)

    work page 2007