Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 100 references

Passive reconfigurable intelligent surfaces are best understood as local geometry tools for satellite networks: they restore blocked links and shape interference, but their measurable coverage benefit is confined to tens of meters from the

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A deployment-first survey of RIS in satellite networks, with a rule-of-thumb linking RIS aperture to the radius over which virtual-LoS links beat direct LoS.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-03 challenge →

load-bearing objection A solid, honest survey whose central rule-of-thumb — passive RIS is a tens-of-meters hotspot tool, not a coverage panacea — survives scrutiny; the novelties are a synthesis and a quick design screen, not a new result. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2512.20982 v1 pith:C7IZGNGA submitted 2025-12-24 eess.SP

Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Enhanced Satellite Networks: Deployment Strategies, Key Capabilities, Practical Solutions, and Future Directions

Ziyuan Zheng , Xiangyu Li , Shirui Zuo , Yu Wan , Bodong Shang , Wenpeng Jing , Qingqing Wu This is my paper
classification eess.SP
keywords reconfigurable intelligent surfacessatellite networksLEO constellationsvirtual line-of-sightspectrum sharinglink budgetcoverage extensionnon-terrestrial networks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a deployment-first synthesis arguing that reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in satellite networks pay off mainly as local geometry tools, not as constellation-scale capacity enablers. Its central quantitative claim is a rule of thumb: a 1 m² facade-mounted RIS at Ka-band keeps a virtual line-of-sight link within 0, -3, and -10 dB of an unobstructed direct satellite link for users up to about 26, 37, and 83 m away, under free-space propagation and ideal steering. The authors organize RIS roles into four deployments—satellite antenna, terminal antenna, inter-satellite relay, and space-ground relay—and show with a double-Friis link budget that the achievable gain is set by aperture, efficiency, and two-hop loss. They further argue that system-level value comes from two mechanisms: restoring connectivity through virtual LoS paths and reshaping interference through angular selectivity. A sympathetic reader would care because the numbers draw a crisp boundary between where passive RIS is competitive and where it is not, guiding near-term deployment decisions.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that RIS-enhanced satellite networking should be understood deployment-first: the effectiveness of a passive RIS is governed by geometry, aperture, and two-hop propagation loss rather than by beamforming algorithms alone. It develops a link-budget model in which an RIS relay is the cascade of two Friis hops with array gain scaling as (MN)²; from this model it derives the rule-of-thumb condition A_RIS ≥ 2√π d_SR d_RU √(d_x d_y)/(η d_SU) 10^(−Δ/20) for a virtual LoS to stay within Δ dB of a direct LoS, yielding the 26/37/83 m radii for a 1 m² Ka-band aperture. It then argues that the same aperture physics explains the four deployment roles: satellite-mounted RIS ne

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the double-Friis far-field link budget of Eq. (1): a passive RIS relay is modeled as two independent distance-squared hops, with the RIS aperture contributing an (MN)² coherent-array gain and a radiation-efficiency factor η². Inverting the requirement that the virtual LoS stay within Δ dB of a direct LoS produces the aperture-versus-distance rule of thumb A_RIS ≥ (2√π/η)(d_SR d_RU/d_SU)√(d_x d_y) 10^(−Δ/20), instantiated at 20 GHz as A_RIS ≈ 2.53 d_RU λ (0 dB), 1.79 d_RU λ (−3 dB), 0.80 d_RU λ (−10 dB). This identity is what converts a qualitative deployment taxonomy into the paper's quantitative boundary: passive RIS is competitive only within tens of meters of the

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a passive RIS relay's gain is adequately described by two independent free-space Friis hops with ideal broadside steering, unit array factor, and an (MN)² coherent aperture gain; if real mutual coupling, near-field focusing loss, phase errors, or sub-unity inter-aperture coupling reduce this gain, the 26/37/83 m radii are optimistic and passive RIS becomes competitive over an even smaller footprint.

What would settle it

Measure the end-to-end received power of a 1 m², roughly 133×133 element Ka-band RIS at 20 GHz relaying a satellite-equivalent source at about 600 km to a user terminal at distances 10–100 m, and compare P(vLoS)/P(LoS) to the paper's predicted 0/−3/−10 dB contours of Eq. (6). Agreement within the η²≈0.49 efficiency allowance would confirm the rule; a systematic shortfall at 26 m would falsify it. A simpler indoor-scale proxy: two horn antennas and a 1 m² metasurface at 20 GHz, with a synthesized far-field source, measuring the crossover distance where the two-hop path falls 10 dB below the dir

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the rule of thumb holds, a 1 m² passive Ka-band RIS can erase a low-elevation LEO blockage only for users within roughly 26–83 m; beyond that, the virtual LoS is more than 10 dB weaker than an unobstructed path.
  • Satellite-mounted RIS apertures need on the order of 10^6 elements before Ka-band LEO downlink SNR becomes comfortably positive, so near-term passive satellite-mounted RIS acts more as a lightweight steerable reflector than a capacity booster.
  • Passive inter-satellite RIS relays lose about 12 dB when inter-satellite distance doubles; they are viable only for short ISLs or modest-rate links unless hybrid active–passive designs add amplification.
  • In spectrum sharing, RIS adds angular selectivity that can null interfering satellites or steer terrestrial uplinks away from satellite payloads, extending feasible reuse regimes without new spectrum.
  • Operations at scale require predictive, event-driven control—ephemeris-aware codebooks, differential updates of a few per second, and OTFS-style delay-Doppler acquisition—rather than continuous closed-loop feedback.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: The 26/37/83 m rule can be read as a deployment planning chart: it specifies the aperture needed for a target coverage radius at any carrier once you fix a tolerated Δ, so operators could choose RIS size from required street-canyon or indoor coverage rather than from available panels.
  • Inference: Since the rule scales as d_RU ∝ A_RIS/λ (for fixed Δ), moving from 20 GHz to 12 GHz roughly halves the coverage radius for the same 1 m² aperture; conversely, a 2 m² panel at 20 GHz reaches about 166 m at −10 dB—an easy testable prediction.
  • Inference: Multi-hop cascades, as the paper notes, cannot be treated as multiplying far-field Friis gains; an inter-aperture coupling factor κ<1 bounds end-to-end gain. A concrete extension would be to measure κ for two 1 m² panels at 10–50 m spacings and fold it into the rule-of-thumb.
  • Inference: If near-field focusing, mutual coupling, and phase errors degrade effective gain below the ideal (MN)², the hotspot radii shrink; a field measurement campaign comparing measured vLoS-to-LoS ratios to Eq. (6) would tell whether active or hybrid RIS is needed even for local coverage.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey/position paper on RIS-aided satellite networks. It proposes four deployment archetypes (satellite-mounted RIS, terminal-mounted RIS, inter-satellite RIS relay, and space-ground RIS relay), develops a double-Friis link-budget model, presents order-of-magnitude numerical scenarios, and frames two system-level capabilities: virtual-LoS connectivity restoration and angular selectivity for spectrum sharing. The load-bearing quantitative output is the rule-of-thumb in Sec. 3.1.4: at 20 GHz, a facade-mounted 1 m² RIS keeps a virtual LoS within 0, -3, and -10 dB of unobstructed LoS for users up to roughly 26, 37, and 83 m away. The paper concludes that passive RIS is best suited to localized hotspot coverage rather than wide-area extension.

Significance. If read as an order-of-magnitude design rule, the paper's central quantitative claim is valuable and falsifiable: it gives a crisp boundary for where passive RIS is competitive in satellite access and explicitly discourages overclaiming. The deployment taxonomy, the link-budget interpretations, and the survey comparison tables are useful contributions. The paper is honest about its idealizations, repeatedly labeling the free-space/ideal-steering model as optimistic, and the numerical results are reproducible from Eq. (1). The main positive feature is that the quantitative discussion converts a qualitative architecture discussion into a concrete, checkable design principle with plausible real-world parameters.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 3.1.4, Eq. (5)] The printed Eq. (5) is algebraically inconsistent with Eq. (4). Substituting A_RIS = M N d_x d_y into M^2 N^2 d_x d_y ≥ ... gives A_RIS ≥ 2√π d_SR d_RU sqrt(d_x d_y)/(η d_SU) 10^{-Δ/20}; the factor sqrt(d_x d_y) belongs in the numerator, not the denominator. As printed, Eq. (5) is dimensionally wrong and would produce sub-meter radii for A_RIS ≈ 1 m². Eq. (6) and Table 4 use the correct numerator form, so the headline 26/37/83 m numbers and the qualitative conclusion survive; nonetheless Eq. (5) must be corrected and the derivation line checked.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3)] The printed Eq. (3) has d_x^2 d_y^2 in the numerator; consistency with Eqs. (1) and (4) requires d_x d_y.
  2. [Sec. 4.3] The text refers to “Table ??”; this should be Table 5.
  3. [References] References [61] and [62] are the same paper; [80] duplicates [61]; [88] duplicates [60]. These should be consolidated.
  4. [Throughout] Numerous typographical/spacing issues remain: “Specfically” (p. 3), “cascased” (p. 21), “Representive” (Sec. 2.5 heading), “wwWave” in Table 1, “UA V” spacing, and “efficient”/“efficiency” throughout. The phrase “productive path loss” appears several times and should be clarified (likely “two-hop path loss” or “product path loss”).
  5. [Sec. 3.1.4] The paper correctly states that the 26/37/83 m numbers are “under the optimistic free-space and ideal-steering abstraction.” I would encourage one additional sentence quantifying how much impairment (e.g., 5–10 dB from mutual coupling/phase errors) would be needed to change the conclusion, since the central claim is quantitative. This is an enhancement, not a requirement for correctness.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the central virtual-LoS rule-of-thumb is an algebraic consequence of a standard Friis link-budget model with stated assumptions, not a fitted or self-referential prediction.

full rationale

The load-bearing quantitative claim in Sec. 3.1.4 (the 26/37/83 m coverage radii for a 1 m^2 RIS) is derived transparently from Eq. (1), the double-Friis link budget, by imposing a threshold condition P_vLoS/P_LoS >= 10^(-Delta/10) and algebraically rearranging to Eq. (4)-(6). No parameter is fitted to data; the inputs (lambda = 15 mm, dx = dy = lambda/2, eta = 0.7, dSR ≈ dSU ≈ 600 km) are explicitly stated modeling choices. The reported radii simply restate the equality implied by those assumptions, which is a legitimate derived design rule rather than a circular prediction. The paper's self-citations ([2], [4], [34], [35]) are used for qualitative background on RIS-aided satellite beamforming and hotspot coverage, not to justify the numerical rule-of-thumb; none of the equations used for the headline numbers depends on those citations. The printed Eq. (3) contains an apparent typo (d_x^2 d_y^2 instead of d_x d_y), but Eq. (4)-(6) follow from Eq. (1), so the inconsistency does not propagate and is not a circularity. The remaining sections are qualitative synthesis and literature organization, with no fitted prediction being relabeled as an independent result. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and the central conclusion is robust to the acknowledged idealizations; no circular step is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central quantitative claims rest on a standard far-field two-hop Friis model with free-space exponents and ideal phase alignment; the hand-chosen efficiency η=0.7 sets the quoted coverage radii. No new physical entities are introduced; the κ factor is an admitted ad hoc energy-conservation clamp.

free parameters (1)
  • RIS radiation efficiency η = 0.7
    Hand-chosen in Sec. 2.5.2 and used in the rule-of-thumb Eq. (6); directly scales the 26/37/83 m distances.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Far-field two-hop Friis model for RIS-aided links (Eq. 1) with independent satellite-RIS and RIS-user path losses
    Used for all quantitative results in Sec. 2.5 and the rule-of-thumb Eq. (6); near-field or coupled aperture effects (acknowledged in Sec. 3.1.4) would alter the scaling.
  • domain assumption Ideal coherent phase alignment with normalized array factors F(φt)F(φr)=1
    Assumed in Sec. 2.5.2 for order-of-magnitude numbers; phase errors, quantization, and mutual coupling are discussed only qualitatively in Sec. 4.3.
  • domain assumption Free-space propagation with α=β=2
    Set in Sec. 2.5.2; ignores atmospheric losses, rain fade, and multipath.
  • ad hoc to paper Inter-aperture coupling factor κ_i→j<1 for multi-hop RIS cascades to enforce energy conservation
    Introduced in Sec. 3.1.4 to prevent unphysical infinite-range multi-hop extrapolation; no model or measured values provided.
  • domain assumption Coverage gaps are dominated by local blockage rather than constellation density
    Core premise of Sec. 3.1.1; supports the claim that RIS is a cost-effective complement.

reviewed 2026-08-03 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Enhanced Satellite Networks: Deployment Strategies, Key Capabilities, Practical Solutions, and Future Directions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C7IZGNGA

@misc{pith2026251220982,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Enhanced Satellite Networks: Deployment Strategies, Key Capabilities, Practical Solutions, and Future Directions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C7IZGNGA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.20982}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Satellite networks promise wide-area 6G coverage but face two persistent barriers: blockage-induced service discontinuities and increasingly stringent spectrum coexistence across satellite layers and with terrestrial systems. Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) act as low-power programmable apertures that redirect energy without the cost and power consumption of fully active arrays. We develop a deployment-first, operations-aware view of RIS-enabled satellite networking that treats RIS as both satellite/terminal antennas and inter-satellite or space-ground relays. We show that system-level gains are governed by two unifying mechanisms: connectivity restoration via virtual line-of-sight links that preserve connectivity under blockage and mobility, and angular selectivity that reshapes interference to enlarge spectrum reuse. We further discuss practical operation under high mobility, highlighting Delay-Doppler channel acquisition, predictive beam tracking, and control designs that budget overhead and latency, and summarize hardware considerations for reliable operation in space. Finally, we outline forward-looking opportunities in the generative artificial intelligence paradigm, multifunctional RIS architectures, ubiquitous satellite integrated sensing and communication, and sustainable satellite Internet-of-Things.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Yaacoub, E., Alouini, M.-S.: A Key 6G Challenge and Opportunity—Connecting the Base of the Pyramid: A Survey on Rural Connectivity. Proc. IEEE 108(4), 533–582 (2020)

    2020

  2. [2]

    Zheng, Z., Jing, W., Lu, Z., Wu, Q., Zhang, H., Gesbert, D.: Cooperative Multi- Satellite and Multi-RIS Beamforming: Enhancing LEO SatCom and Mitigating LEO-GEO Intersystem Interference. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 43(1), 279– 296 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    IEEE Trans

    Wu, Q., Zhang, R.: Intelligent Reflecting Surface Enhanced Wireless Network via Joint Active and Passive Beamforming. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 18(11), 5394–5409 (2019)

    2019

  4. [4]

    IEEE Trans

    Zheng, Z., Jing, W., Lu, Z., Wen, X., Wu, Q., Shao, H.: RIS-Aided Hotspot Capacity Enhancement for Multibeam Satellite Systems. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 23(4), 3648–3664 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    IEEE Internet of Things Magazine 8(5), 136–143 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1109/MIOT.2025

    Khennoufa, F., Abdellatif, K., Yanikomeroglu, H., Ozturk, M., Elganimi, T., Kara, F.: A multi-layer non-terrestrial networks architecture for 6g and beyond 37 under realistic conditions and with practical limitations. IEEE Internet of Things Magazine 8(5), 136–143 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1109/MIOT.2025. 3575923

    work page doi:10.1109/miot.2025 2025

  6. [6]

    IEEE Network 39(1), 80–89 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET

    Khan, W.U., Mahmood, A., Jamshed, M.A., Lagunas, E., Ahmed, M., Chatzino- tas, S.: Beyond diagonal ris for 6g non-terrestrial networks: Potentials and challenges. IEEE Network 39(1), 80–89 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET. 2024.3480332

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    IEEE Network 35(4), 42–48 (2021) https://doi.org/10

    Cao, X., Yang, B., Huang, C., Yuen, C., Zhang, Y., Niyato, D., Han, Z.: Con- verged reconfigurable intelligent surface and mobile edge computing for space information networks. IEEE Network 35(4), 42–48 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1109/MNET.011.2100049

    2021

  8. [8]

    IEEE Network 38(4), 96–102 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2024.3381580

    Liu, Q., Feng, Z., Chen, D., Tan, F., He, C.: Empowering 6g non-terrestrial net- works with intelligent reflection technologies for iot applications. IEEE Network 38(4), 96–102 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2024.3381580

    arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    IEEE Network 35(6), 225–232 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.011.2100007

    Xu, S., Liu, J., Rodrigues, T.K., Kato, N.: Envisioning intelligent reflecting surface empowered space-air-ground integrated network. IEEE Network 35(6), 225–232 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.011.2100007

    work page doi:10.1109/mnet.011.2100007 2021

  10. [11]

    : Integrated 6g tn and ntn localization: Challenges, opportuni- ties, and advancements

    Saleh, S., et al. : Integrated 6g tn and ntn localization: Challenges, opportuni- ties, and advancements. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine 9(2), 63–71 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOMSTD.2025.3569014

    arXiv 2025

  11. [12]

    : Integrated sensing and communications for iot: Synergies with key 6g technology enablers

    Kaushik, A., et al. : Integrated sensing and communications for iot: Synergies with key 6g technology enablers. IEEE Internet of Things Magazine 7(5), 136– 143 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTM.001.2400052

    work page doi:10.1109/iotm.001.2400052 2024

  12. [13]

    : Leo satellite access network (leo-san) toward 6g: Challenges and approaches

    Xiao, Z., et al. : Leo satellite access network (leo-san) toward 6g: Challenges and approaches. IEEE Wireless Communications 31(2), 89–96 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1109/MWC.011.2200310

    work page doi:10.1109/mwc.011.2200310 2024

  13. [14]

    IEEE Network 38(5), 273–285 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2024.3353806

    Luo, X., Chen, H.-H., Guo, Q.: Leo/vleo satellite communications in 6g and beyond networks–technologies, applications, and challenges. IEEE Network 38(5), 273–285 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2024.3353806

    arXiv 2024

  14. [15]

    Proceedings of the IEEE 110(9), 1423–1465 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2022.3169690

    Ye, J., Qiao, J., Kammoun, A., Alouini, M.-S.: Nonterrestrial communications assisted by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces. Proceedings of the IEEE 110(9), 1423–1465 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2022.3169690

    arXiv 2022

  15. [16]

    IEEE Internet of Things Magazine 7(1), 12–18 (2024) https://doi

    Wu, M., Guo, K., Li, X., Nauman, A., An, K., Wang, J.: Optimization design in 38 ris-assisted integrated satellite-uav-served 6g iot: A deep reinforcement learning approach. IEEE Internet of Things Magazine 7(1), 12–18 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1109/IOTM.001.2300111

    work page doi:10.1109/iotm.001.2300111 2024

  16. [17]

    IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine 20(1), 55–64 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1109/MVT.2024

    Umer, M., Mohsin, M.A., Kaushik, A., Nadeem, Q.-U.-A., Nasir, A.A., Hassan, S.A.: Reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted aerial nonterrestrial networks: An intelligent synergy with deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine 20(1), 55–64 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1109/MVT.2024. 3524745

    work page doi:10.1109/mvt.2024 2025

  17. [18]

    IEEE Internet of Things Magazine 7(1), 34–39 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTM.001.2300208

    Khan, W.U., Mahmood, A., Sheemar, C.K., Lagunas, E., Chatzinotas, S., Otter- sten, B.: Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for 6g non-terrestrial networks: Assisting connectivity from the sky. IEEE Internet of Things Magazine 7(1), 34–39 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTM.001.2300208

    work page doi:10.1109/iotm.001.2300208 2024

  18. [19]

    IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine 17(3), 45–53 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/MVT.2022.3168995

    Tekbıyık, K., Kurt, G.K., Ekti, A.R., Yanikomeroglu, H.: Reconfigurable intelli- gent surfaces in action for nonterrestrial networks. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine 17(3), 45–53 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/MVT.2022.3168995

    arXiv 2022

  19. [20]

    IEEE Network 37(3), 118–125 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.123.2100761

    Bariah, L., Mohjazi, L., Abumarshoud, H., Selim, B., Muhaidat, S., Tatipamula, M., Imran, M.A., Haas, H.: Ris-assisted space-air-ground integrated networks: New horizons for flexible access and connectivity. IEEE Network 37(3), 118–125 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.123.2100761

    work page doi:10.1109/mnet.123.2100761 2023

  20. [21]

    IEEE Communications Magazine 62(11), 128–135 (2024) https:// doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.002.2300554

    Toka, M., Lagunas, E., Jamshed, M.A., Chatzinotas, S., Ottersten, B.: Ris- empowered leo satellite networks for 6g: Promising usage scenarios and future directions. IEEE Communications Magazine 62(11), 128–135 (2024) https:// doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.002.2300554

    work page doi:10.1109/mcom.002.2300554 2024

  21. [22]

    IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 26(4), 2258–2289 (2024) https:// doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3393612

    Liu, R., et al.: Ris-empowered satellite-aerial-terrestrial networks with pd-noma. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 26(4), 2258–2289 (2024) https:// doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3393612

    arXiv 2024

  22. [23]

    IEEE Communications Magazine 63(6), 130–136 (2025) https://doi.org/10

    Khoshafa, M.H., Bueno, F., Ngatched, T.M.N., Renzo, M.D.: Ris-empowered secured space-air-ground integrated networks: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine 63(6), 130–136 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1109/MCOM.001.2400398

    2025

  23. [24]

    : Synergizing airborne non-terrestrial networks and recon- figurable intelligent surfaces-aided 6g iot

    Jamshed, M.A., et al. : Synergizing airborne non-terrestrial networks and recon- figurable intelligent surfaces-aided 6g iot. IEEE Internet of Things Magazine 7(2), 46–52 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/IOTM.001.2300242

    work page doi:10.1109/iotm.001.2300242 2024

  24. [25]

    IEEE Network 39(3), 215–222 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2025.3536848

    Trinh, P.V., Sugiura, S., Xu, C., Hanzo, L.: Toward quantum sagins harnessing optical riss: Applications, advances, and the road ahead. IEEE Network 39(3), 215–222 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2025.3536848

    arXiv 2025

  25. [26]

    IEEE Network 37(3), 178–185 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.116.2200060

    Ramezani, P., Lyu, B., Jamalipour, A.: Toward ris-enhanced integrated 39 terrestrial/non-terrestrial connectivity in 6g. IEEE Network 37(3), 178–185 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.116.2200060

    work page doi:10.1109/mnet.116.2200060 2023

  26. [27]

    IEEE Communications Standards Magazine 9(1), 6–12 (2025) https://doi.org/10

    Wu, M., Guo, K., Li, X., Asif, M., Han, C., Rabie, K.M.: Urllc for drl- ris-aided sagins: New mentalities, trends and preliminary solutions. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine 9(1), 6–12 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1109/MCOMSTD.0001.2400004

    arXiv 2025

  27. [28]

    Zheng, B., Lin, S., Zhang, R.: Intelligent Reflecting Surface-Aided LEO Satellite Communication: Cooperative Passive Beamforming and Distributed Channel Estimation. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 40(10), 3057–3070 (2022)

    2022

  28. [29]

    IEEE Trans

    Liu, K., Zhang, Z., Dai, L., Hanzo, L.: Compact User-Specific Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Uplink Transmission. IEEE Trans. Commun. 70(1), 680– 692 (2021)

    2021

  29. [30]

    IEEE Commun

    Hu, X., Yi, Y., Kai, C., Zhang, Y., Li, K.: Securing Uplink Transmissions in Cellular Network via User-Specific Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces. IEEE Commun. Lett. 27(9), 2298–2302 (2023)

    2023

  30. [31]

    : Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces in Action for Nonterrestrial Networks

    Tekbıyık, K., Kurt, G.K., Ekti, A.R., et al. : Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces in Action for Nonterrestrial Networks. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 17(3), 45–53 (2022)

    2022

  31. [32]

    IEEE Trans

    Shang, B., Zhang, S., Wong, Z.J.: Channel Modeling and Rate Analysis of Optical Inter-Satellite Link (OISL). IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 1–6 (2025)

    2025

  32. [33]

    : Technical Advancements Towards RIS-Assisted NTN-Based THz Communication for 6G and Beyond

    Amodu, O.A., Nordin, R., Abdullah, N.F., et al. : Technical Advancements Towards RIS-Assisted NTN-Based THz Communication for 6G and Beyond. IEEE Access 12, 183153–183181 (2024)

    2024

  33. [34]

    In: Proc

    Zheng, Z., Jing, W., Lu, Z., Wen, X.: RIS-Enhanced LEO Satellite Communica- tion: Joint Passive Beamforming and Orientation Optimization. In: Proc. IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), pp. 874–879 (2022)

    2022

  34. [35]

    In: 2023 IEEE 34th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), pp

    Cao, N., Zheng, Z., Jing, W., Lu, Z., Wen, X.: RIS-Assisted Coverage Exten- sion for LEO Satellite Communication in Blockage Scenarios. In: 2023 IEEE 34th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), pp. 1–6 (2023)

    2023

  35. [36]

    IEEE Trans

    Park, J., Choi, J., Lee, N.: A tractable approach to coverage analysis in downlink satellite networks. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 22(2), 793–807 (2022)

    2022

  36. [37]

    IEEE Commun

    Okati, N., Riihonen, T.: Stochastic coverage analysis for multi-altitude leo satellite networks. IEEE Commun. Lett. 27(12), 3305–3309 (2023)

    2023

  37. [38]

    : Multi-Connectivity Between Terrestrial and 40 Non-Terrestrial MIMO Systems

    Shang, B., Li, X., Li, Z., et al. : Multi-Connectivity Between Terrestrial and 40 Non-Terrestrial MIMO Systems. IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc. 5, 3245–3262 (2024)

    2024

  38. [39]

    IEEE Trans

    Li, X., Shang, B.: Downlink performance of cell-free massive MIMO for LEO satellite mega-constellation. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., 1–1 (2025)

    2025

  39. [40]

    IEEE Access 12 (2024)

    Voicu, A.M., Bhattacharya, A., Petrova, M.: Handover Strategies for Emerging LEO, MEO, and HEO Satellite Networks. IEEE Access 12 (2024)

    2024

  40. [41]

    IEEE Trans

    Li, Z., Shang, B.: Enriched k-tier heterogeneous satellite networks model with user association policies. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 1–16 (2025)

    2025

  41. [42]

    IEEE Internet Things J

    Abudureheman, Y., Chu, J., Song, R., Liu, X., Huangfu, W., Zhang, H.: Resource allocation in multi-beam leo satellite systems based on beam hopping and frequency reuse. IEEE Internet Things J. (2025)

    2025

  42. [43]

    IEEE Trans

    Han, K., Siew, M., Xu, B., Guo, S., Gong, W., Quek, T.Q., Ren, Q.: On-demand optimization method for cross-layer topology in multi-task vleo and mega-leo heterogeneous satellite networks. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 24(11), 9598– 9612 (2025)

    2025

  43. [44]

    IEEE Commun

    Radhakrishnan, R., Edmonson, W.W., Afghah, F., Rodriguez-Osorio, R.M., Pinto, F., Burleigh, S.C.: Survey of Inter-Satellite Communication for Small Satellite Systems: Physical Layer to Network Layer View. IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. 18(4), 2442–2473 (2016)

    2016

  44. [45]

    : Position, navigation, and timing (PNT) through low earth orbit (LEO) satellites: A survey on current status, challenges, and opportunities

    Prol, F.S., Ferre, R.M., Saleem, Z., Välisuo, P., Pinell, C., Lohan, E.S., Elsan- houry, M., Elmusrati, M., Islam, S., Çelikbilek, K., et al. : Position, navigation, and timing (PNT) through low earth orbit (LEO) satellites: A survey on current status, challenges, and opportunities. IEEE Access 10, 83971–84002 (2022)

    2022

  45. [46]

    IEEE Commun

    Khoshafa, M.H., Bueno, F., Ngatched, T.M., Di Renzo, M.: RIS-Empowered Secured Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks: Opportunities and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 63(6), 130–136 (2025)

    2025

  46. [47]

    IEEE Netw., 1–1 (2025)

    Li, X., Shang, B.: Advancing Multi-Connectivity in Satellite-Terrestrial Inte- grated Networks: Architectures, Challenges, and Applications. IEEE Netw., 1–1 (2025)

    2025

  47. [48]

    arXiv:2408.12145

    Kim, D., Park, J., Choi, J., et al.: Spectrum Sharing Between Low Earth Orbit Satellite and Terrestrial Networks: A Stochastic Geometry Perspective Analysis. arXiv:2408.12145. [Online]. A vailable: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.12145 (2024)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [49]

    : Spectrum Sharing in 6G Space-Ground Integrated Networks: A Ground Protection Zone-Based Design

    Shang, B., Li, X., Wang, Z., et al. : Spectrum Sharing in 6G Space-Ground Integrated Networks: A Ground Protection Zone-Based Design. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Commun. Netw. (ICN), pp. 40–45 (2025). IEEE 41

    2025

  49. [50]

    IEEE Netw., 1–1 (2025)

    Shang, B., Wang, Z., Li, X., et al.: Spectrum Sharing in Satellite-Terrestrial Integrated Networks: Frameworks, Approaches, and Opportunities. IEEE Netw., 1–1 (2025)

    2025

  50. [51]

    In: Proc

    Hadani, R., Rakib, S., Tsatsanis, M., Monk, A., Goldsmith, A.J., Molisch, A.F., Calderbank, R.: Orthogonal time frequency space modulation. In: Proc. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC) (2017)

    2017

  51. [52]

    IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 17(10), 6501–6515 (2018)

    Raviteja, P., Phan, K.T., Hong, Y., Viterbo, E.: Interference cancellation and iterative detection for orthogonal time frequency space modulation. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 17(10), 6501–6515 (2018)

    2018

  52. [53]

    IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 68(5), 4906–4917 (2019)

    Raviteja, P., Phan, K.T., Hong, Y.: Embedded pilot-aided channel estimation for otfs in delay–doppler channels. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 68(5), 4906–4917 (2019)

    2019

  53. [54]

    IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 40(10), 2865–2881 (2022)

    Shen, B., Wu, Y., An, J., Xing, C., Zhao, L.C., Zhang, W.: Random access with massive mimo-otfs in leo satellite communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 40(10), 2865–2881 (2022)

    2022

  54. [55]

    IEEE Communica- tions Letters 27(1), 337–341 (2023)

    Bhat, V.S., Harshavardhan, G., Chockalingam, A.: Input-output relation and performance of ris-aided otfs with fractional delay–doppler. IEEE Communica- tions Letters 27(1), 337–341 (2023)

    2023

  55. [56]

    IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology 6, 1881–1909 (2025)

    Tao, Q., Li, Z., Zhi, K., Li, S., Yuan, W., Zaniboni, L., Stanczak, S., Viterbo, E., Wang, X.: A survey on reconfigurable intelligent surface-assisted orthogonal time frequency space systems. IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology 6, 1881–1909 (2025)

    1909

  56. [57]

    IEEE Trans

    Thomas, A., Deka, K., Sharma, S., Rajamohan, N.: IRS-Assisted OTFS System: Design and Analysis. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 72(3), 3345–3358 (2023)

    2023

  57. [58]

    IEEE Trans

    He, H., Zhou, D., Sheng, M., Li, J.: Hierarchical Cross-Domain Satellite Resource Management: An Intelligent Collaboration Perspective. IEEE Trans. Commun. 71(4), 2201–2215 (2023)

    2023

  58. [59]

    IEEE Commun

    Bannour, F., Souihi, S., Mellouk, A.: Distributed SDN Control: Survey, Taxon- omy, and Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. 20(1), 333–354 (2018)

    2018

  59. [60]

    IEEE Commun

    Kunz, A., Baskaran, S.B.M., Alexandropoulos, G.C.: Lightweight Security for Ambient-Powered Programmable Reflections with Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces. IEEE Commun. Standards Mag., 1–1 (2025)

    2025

  60. [61]

    IEEE Commun

    Khoramnejad, F., Hossain, E.: Generative AI for the Optimization of Next- Generation Wireless Networks: Basics, State-of-the-Art, and Open Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., 1–1 (2025) 42

    2025

  61. [63]

    : Ris-Assisted Space-Air- Ground Integrated Networks: New Horizons for Flexible Access and Connectiv- ity

    Bariah, L., Mohjazi, L., Abumarshoud, H., et al. : Ris-Assisted Space-Air- Ground Integrated Networks: New Horizons for Flexible Access and Connectiv- ity. IEEE Netw. 37(3), 118–125 (2022)

    2022

  62. [64]

    IEEE Access 11, 141801–141859 (2023)

    Ibrahim, L., Mahmud, M.N., Salleh, M.F.M., Al-Rimawi, A.: Joint beamforming optimization design and performance evaluation of RIS-aided wireless net- works: A comprehensive state-of-the-art review. IEEE Access 11, 141801–141859 (2023)

    2023

  63. [65]

    IEEE Commun

    Liu, Y., Liu, X., Mu, X., Hou, T., Xu, J., Di Renzo, M., Al-Dhahir, N.: Recon- figurable Intelligent Surfaces: Principles and Opportunities. IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts. 23(3), 1546–1577 (2021)

    2021

  64. [66]

    IEEE Trans

    Xv, H., Sun, Y., Zhao, Y., Peng, M., Zhang, S.: Joint beam scheduling and beam- forming design for cooperative positioning in multi-beam leo satellite networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 73(4), 5276–5287 (2023)

    2023

  65. [67]

    IEEE Trans

    Kim, T., Jung, M., Son, H.: Joint user scheduling and phase shift optimization for star-ris-assisted multicast satellite communications. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 60(5), 7466–7474 (2024)

    2024

  66. [68]

    IEEE Trans

    Li, W., Jia, L., Chen, Q., et al.: A Game Theory-Based Distributed Downlink Spectrum Sharing Method in Large-Scale Hybrid Satellite Constellations. IEEE Trans. Commun. 72(8) (2024)

    2024

  67. [69]

    In: ECCSUBMIT Conferences, vol

    Hugh, Q., Soria, F.: Resource-aware network slicing for qos-driven service orchestration in integrated satellite–5g systems. In: ECCSUBMIT Conferences, vol. 3, pp. 70–75 (2025)

    2025

  68. [70]

    In: Proc

    Momani, M., Delamotte, T., Knopp, A.: Beam update rate analysis for low- complexity hybrid beamforming in leo satellites. In: Proc. 12th Adv. Satell. Multimedia Syst. Conf. 18th Signal Process. Space Commun. Workshop (ASM- S/SPSC), pp. 1–6 (2025). IEEE

    2025

  69. [71]

    IEEE Trans

    Lin, Z., Niu, H., An, K., Wang, Y., Zheng, G., Chatzinotas, S., Hu, Y.: Refract- ing ris-aided hybrid satellite-terrestrial relay networks: Joint beamforming design and optimization. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 58(4), 3717–3724 (2022)

    2022

  70. [72]

    IEEE Trans

    Morel, C., Arapoglou, P.-D., Angelone, M., Ginesi, A.: Link adaptation strate- gies for next generation satellite video broadcasting: A system approach. IEEE Trans. Broadcast. 61(4), 603–614 (2015) 43

    2015

  71. [73]

    Liu, J., Zhang, J., Li, T., Zhou, Y., Wang, Y.: Unintended interference sup- pression based on decision feedback adaptive cancellation for dsss satellite communication. Chin. J. Electron. 34(2), 673–682 (2025)

    2025

  72. [74]

    IEEE Trans

    He, H., Zhou, D., Sheng, M., et al.: Hierarchical Cross-Domain Satellite Resource Management: An Intelligent Collaboration Perspective. IEEE Trans. Commun. 71(4), 2201–2215 (2023)

    2023

  73. [75]

    In: Proc

    Li, X., Shang, B., Wu, Q.: A Bistatic Sensing System in Space-Air-Ground Integrated Networks. In: Proc. IEEE/CIC Int. Conf. Commun. China (ICCC), pp. 1823–1827 (2024)

    2024

  74. [76]

    IEEE Trans

    Xu, Y., Tian, Q., Chen, Q., Wu, Q., Huang, C., Zhang, H., Yuen, C.: Robust Secure Beamforming Design for Multi-RIS-aided MISO systems with Hardware Impairments and Channel Uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Commun. 73(3) (2025)

    2025

  75. [77]

    IEEE Trans

    Jiang, C., Zhang, C., Huang, C., Zhang, J., Zhu, X., Ge, J., Debbah, M., Yuen, C.: A Hybrid Framework of RIS-assisted Robust Secure Transmission Design for Multibeam Satellite Communications. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 74(4) (2025)

    2025

  76. [78]

    In: Proc

    Dai, C.-Q., Wang, K., Liao, M.: Secrecy Rate Optimization for Active-Ris Assisted LEO Satellite Communications. In: Proc. IEEE 24th Int. Conf. Commun. Technol. (ICCT), pp. 1756–1760 (2024). IEEE

    2024

  77. [79]

    Sensors 22(8), 2979 (2022)

    Tang, S., Pan, Z., Hu, G., Wu, Y., Li, Y.: Deep Reinforcement Learning- Based Resource Allocation for Satellite Internet of Things with Diverse QoS Guarantee. Sensors 22(8), 2979 (2022)

    2022

  78. [80]

    IEEE Commun

    Khoramnejad, F., Hossain, E.: Generative AI for the Optimization of Next- Generation Wireless Networks: Basics, State-of-the-Art, and Open Challenges. IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., 1–1 (2025)

    2025

  79. [81]

    Sensors 24(2), 337 (2024)

    Naaz, F., Nauman, A., Khurshaid, T., Kim, S.-W.: Empowering the Vehicular Network with RIS Technology: A State-of-the-Art Review. Sensors 24(2), 337 (2024)

    2024

  80. [82]

    IEEE Internet Things J

    Ma, Z., Xiao, M., Xiao, Y., Pang, Z., Poor, H.V., Vucetic, B.: High-Reliability and Low-latency Wireless Communication for Internet of Things: Challenges, Fundamentals, and Enabling Technologies. IEEE Internet Things J. 6(5), 7946– 7970 (2019)

    2019

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 3, 2026.