Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Soliton formation in a bound state in the continuum GaN waveguide polariton laser

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In a GaN waveguide polariton laser, the condensate at a bound state in the continuum forms an interaction-induced bright soliton above the lasing threshold.

desk verdict Solid BIC-lasing experiment, but the soliton claim leans on a theory curve with unreported parameters; the paper needs a serious referee and a revision that makes the comparison falsifiable. read the letter →

arxiv 2512.23368 v2 pith:LAJYJ3HE submitted 2025-12-29 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.quant-gasphysics.optics

V. Develay , O. Bahrova , I. Septembre , D. Bobylev , C. Brimont , L. Doyennette , B. Alloing , H. Souissi
show 6 more authors
E. Cambril S. Bouchoule J. Zúñiga-Pérez D. Solnyshkov G. Malpuech T. Guillet
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gasphysics.optics PACS 71.36.+c42.55.Sa
keywords boundstatesinthecontinuumexciton-polaritonsGaNwaveguidepolaritonlasingsolitonformationnegativeeffectivemasspolariton-polaritoninteractionspolarizationvortex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the first experimental observation of polariton condensation on a symmetry-protected bound state in the continuum (BIC) in a GaN waveguide, and shows that above the lasing threshold the condensate forms a bright soliton. The BIC's negative effective mass combined with repulsive polariton-polariton interactions produces an effective attraction that self-localizes the condensate. The claim is supported by measuring the blueshift and momentum-space broadening of the BIC emission as a function of pump power, which agree with a modified Gross-Pitaevskii model. If correct, this shows that interaction physics, not just photon confinement, shapes the emission of BIC lasers.

What carries the argument

The central tool is a modified 1D Gross-Pitaevskii equation (Eq. 2) with gain, losses, and a Gaussian reservoir, together with a simple analytic formula for the soliton's reciprocal-space width, δkx ≈ 1/(ξ − ℓ), where ξ is the healing length and ℓ is a reservoir-potential correction. The negative effective mass m = −(3.1 ± 0.1)×10⁻⁶ m₀ of the BIC band makes the repulsive interaction effectively attractive, and the analytic formula is validated against numerical GPE simulations (R² = 0.9999). This machinery is what converts the measured blueshift into a predicted k-space width and lets the authors call the state a soliton.

What would settle it

Measure the real-space emission profile of the condensate at 1.2 and 2 Pth and check whether it follows a sech² shape with widths of 6 to 4 µm, as predicted. Alternatively, scan the pump spot size: if the 'soliton' size follows the pump spot rather than remaining 4 to 6 µm, it is a reservoir trap, not an interaction soliton.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms: a polaritonic bound state in the continuum in a GaN waveguide, verified by suppressed emission and a topological polarization vortex, becomes a polariton laser above threshold. At pump powers above threshold, the emission energy blueshifts and the momentum-space width grows with pump power in a way that matches a theoretical curve for an interaction-induced bright soliton. The soliton arises because the BIC band has negative effective mass along the grating direction, and repulsive polariton-polariton and polariton-reservoir interactions then act as an effective self-focusing nonlinearity. The real-space width shrinks to 4-6 µm, much smaller than the 28 µm pump spot

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative soliton identification depends on the assumption that the reservoir exciton density follows the Gaussian pump profile and stays constant in time, and that the 2D system can be reduced to an effective 1D model with the given parameters; if the reservoir shape or the pump-to-density calibration differs, the predicted δkx(E) curve shifts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • BIC polariton lasers are not just passive resonators: polariton-polariton interactions actively reshape the emission, giving a power-tunable angular profile.
  • The soliton's 30% angular broadening above threshold must be considered in designing BIC laser sources, and can be exploited to improve light extraction.
  • Soliton formation on a negative-mass BIC distinguishes polariton lasing from bare-photon lasing, providing a direct test of interaction-driven physics.
  • The self-localized, long-lifetime BIC soliton is a candidate building block for polariton-based information processing and storage.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct way to test the interpretation would be real-space imaging: the predicted sech² density profile with width shrinking from ~6 to ~4 µm between 1.2 and 2 Pth is a stronger fingerprint than the k-space broadening alone.
  • If the 1D reduction fails at higher pump powers, the BIC condensate may develop transverse (ky) structure or instabilities; an explicit 2D simulation would clarify the range of validity.
  • The same pump-power-to-broadening diagnostic could be applied to other symmetry-protected BICs (e.g., in perovskite or dielectric metasurfaces) to look for universal soliton behavior.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental study of a GaN waveguide polariton structure with a symmetry-protected bound state in the continuum (BIC). The BIC is identified by a ~30× suppression of emission at kx=0 and by a polarization vortex in momentum space. Upon non-resonant pumping, the authors observe polariton condensation/lasing on the BIC, evidenced by a threshold kink, a blueshift of the BIC energy with pump power, and a buildup of coherent emission. The central claim is that above threshold the condensate forms an interaction-induced bright soliton, based on the pump-dependent broadening of the emission in reciprocal space and on the agreement of the measured δkx versus blueshift with an analytical expression (Eq. 1) and with 1D modified Gross-Pitaevskii simulations (Eq. 2).

Significance. If established, the observation of a polariton soliton on a BIC would be a notable advance: it combines two active fields (polaritonics and BIC photonics) and has potential implications for BIC laser emission patterns and light extraction. The BIC identification and the lasing evidence are solid and well documented, including the topological vortex and threshold behavior. The soliton claim is the novel part of the paper, but it currently rests on a quantitative comparison whose parameters are not disclosed. The paper would be strengthened considerably by making that comparison reproducible; with the missing parameter values supplied, the result could be of high interest to the mesoscopic photonics and polariton communities.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4 'BIC soliton', Eq. (1) and Fig. 4(h)] The central quantitative evidence for the soliton claim is the comparison of the measured δkx(E) with the theoretical blue curve obtained from Eq. (1). The parameters entering Eq. (1) — the interaction constant α, the correction length ℓ (or equivalently the reservoir potential height/width), the saturation density N_sat, the LO-phonon scattering element W_LO, the baseline loss Γ0, the loss-profile amplitude Λ, and the pump-power-to-density calibration — are not reported in the main text or the Supplemental. The Supplemental only states that Eq. (1) fits the numerical simulation 'for the chosen parameters' (Fig. S8), but those chosen parameters are not listed. Without these values, the blue curve in Fig. 4(h) cannot be regenerated, and the claimed agreement is not a falsifiable quantitative test; the curve can be adjusted via ℓ (and α) to the few experimental points. The authors should p
  2. [Eq. (2) and dimensional reduction] The system is described as having a saddle-point dispersion: negative effective mass along kx and positive mass along ky (Fig. 1(d)–(f)). Yet the Gross-Pitaevskii model in Eq. (2) is strictly 1D, with the transverse direction integrated out. No justification is given for ignoring the y dynamics, and no statement is made about whether the condensate is transversely confined or extended. If the condensate is not localized in y, a 1D soliton interpretation is incomplete; if it is localized, the confinement mechanism should be specified. The experiment reports δkx only, not the full two-dimensional momentum distribution. The authors should report the full 2D k-space images above threshold, give δky(E), and justify the reduction to 1D (for example, by showing that the y-profile remains set by the Gaussian pump and does not evolve with power). Without this, the observed kx broadening could in
  3. [Supplemental Fig. S8] The validation of Eq. (1) in the Supplemental is self-consistent but not independent: the analytical formula is fitted to simulations generated with the same model used to interpret the experiment, and the fit parameters are not given. The R²=0.9999 demonstrates that Eq. (1) can mimic the numerical curve for a chosen parameter set, but it does not validate the transferability of those parameters to the actual sample. The manuscript should state explicitly whether the reservoir shape, N_sat, W_LO, and the pump-power-to-density mapping used in the simulations were extracted from the same experimental measurements (e.g., the measured effective mass and loss profile) or chosen for convenience. This distinction is important because the confirming theory [60] shares authors with the present work; transparent parameter reporting is essential to avoid the appearance of retroactive fitting.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] Typos and grammar: 'completly' should be 'completely'; 'FWHM' with math-mode mu appears inconsistently; the phrase 'theoretically described in [60]' would benefit from a verb tense correction. Also, the label 'Fig. 4(d-f)' in the text does not match the panel layout of Fig. 4 (which includes panels g and h); please align the figure callouts.
  2. [Fig. 4(h)] The experimental points have error bars, but the theoretical curve has no uncertainty band. Please state how δkx was extracted (e.g., FWHM of a Lorentzian fit) and how many pump powers are included. An uncertainty band propagated from the experimental mass and from the range of reported GaN interaction constants would make the comparison much more informative.
  3. [Fig. 2(a)] The ~30× suppression factor is stated in the text, but the quadratic fit is not described. Please give the fit function and the extracted BIC width or lifetime in the caption or in the text, so that the reader can assess the quality of the BIC identification.
  4. [Polarization vortex, Fig. 2(b,c)] The central region is masked due to weak signal, which is reasonable. Consider quantifying the winding number (topological charge) of the vortex rather than only showing the vector field, as this would strengthen the topological-protection claim.
  5. [Soliton size in real space] The text states that the soliton size is 4–6 µm, which is significantly smaller than the 28 µm pump spot, and uses this to argue for interaction-induced localization. Please clarify whether this real-space size is directly imaged or inferred from the k-space width via Fourier transformation. If inferred, state the conversion used and its assumptions.
  6. [References and Supplemental] The reference to 'Supplementary [65]' has a placeholder URL; this is acceptable for a preprint but should be completed at submission. Also, the Supplemental contains specific parameter values (e.g., Rabi splitting, detuning) that are mentioned as adjustable; please ensure these are listed explicitly, as they are needed to reproduce the COMSOL and coupled-oscillator results.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the BIC and lasing claims are self-contained, and the soliton identification is a test of a previously published prediction, though the quantitative theory curve is a fit to the authors' own simulations with several unreported parameters.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the BIC identification rests on independent experimental observations — the ~30x suppression of emission near kx=0 (Fig. 2a) and the measured polarization vortex (Fig. 2b) — both compared against COMSOL simulations that do not assume the target result. The lasing claim is supported by a threshold curve (Fig. 3b) and a superlinear buildup of BIC emission, again independent of the soliton model. The soliton claim is the only part that could raise circularity concerns, but the paper does not fit Eq. (1) to the experimental δkx(E) points; instead, the theoretical curve is obtained from Eq. (1), whose functional form is adjusted to match the authors' own Gross-Pitaevskii simulations (Supplementary Fig. S8, R²=0.9999). That is a consistency check between an analytical fit and a numerical model, not a reduction of the prediction to the measured data. The cited prior prediction [60] is authored by an overlapping group, but it is a published, externally falsifiable theoretical result that the present experiment tests; self-citation alone is not circularity. The unreported numerical values of ℓ, α, N_sat, W_LO, and the pump-to-density calibration are a reproducibility and falsifiability weakness, not a circular step, because the experimental data are not used to set those parameters. No equation in the paper is equivalent to its inputs by construction, and the central BIC and lasing evidence is self-contained against external benchmarks. Hence no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard polariton GPE with interaction and reservoir terms, but several parameters entering the theory are unquantified or taken from previous work. No new physical entities are introduced. The biggest cost is the unstated pump-to-density calibration and the correction length ℓ, which are effectively free parameters in the theory-experiment comparison.

free parameters (8)
  • Effective mass m = -(3.1±0.1)×10⁻⁶ m0
    Measured from the experimental polariton dispersion (Fig. 1b); used as an input in Eq. (2). Not fitted to the soliton data, but its uncertainty is not propagated to the theoretical curve.
  • Loss profile amplitude Λ = -0.05
    Determines the k²-dependent loss profile of the BIC state in Eq. (2); inferred from the experimental BIC emission broadening.
  • Polariton-polariton interaction constant α = not stated; αn ≈ 0.5 meV typical
    Central to the blueshift and soliton size; taken from prior GaN waveguide literature [70], not measured in this sample. Uncertainty not propagated.
  • Saturation density Nsat = not stated
    Appears in the gain saturation term of Eq. (2). The Supplement (Fig. S8) says different Nsat values were used to fit the analytical formula, but the chosen value is not reported.
  • LO-phonon scattering element W_LO = not stated
    Controls polariton injection from the reservoir in Eq. (2). Not quantified in the main text.
  • Baseline loss rate Γ0 = not stated
    Linear loss in Eq. (2); numerical value not specified.
  • Reservoir density amplitude and pump-to-density calibration = not stated
    The reservoir is assumed to follow the Gaussian pump profile; the amplitude mapping from pump power to nx(x) is not given, yet it sets the interaction energy scale in the theory.
  • Correction length ℓ in Eq. (1) = not stated
    A phenomenological correction representing the localizing potential; obtained by fitting the analytical width formula to GPE simulations for chosen reservoir parameters (Supplement).
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Gross-Pitaevskii description of the polariton condensate (Eq. 2) with scalar wavefunction ψ(x,t) and mean-field interactions
    The standard framework for polariton condensates; used as the basis for the soliton prediction and the theoretical curve.
  • domain assumption The BIC is a symmetry-protected state with negative effective mass along x and strongly suppressed radiative losses at kx=0
    Supported by COMSOL simulations, the emission suppression, and the polarization vortex; this is the physical setup for the soliton mechanism.
  • domain assumption The reservoir excitons follow the spatial profile of the pump laser and are constant in time
    Stated in the text after Eq. (2); the reservoir potential and gain are static and Gaussian. Carrier diffusion or temporal dynamics are neglected.
  • domain assumption The system can be treated as effectively one-dimensional (x-direction)
    The BIC sits at a saddle point with an additional transverse (ky) free direction, but the GPE is solved in 1D. The transverse confinement/extension is not modeled.
  • ad hoc to paper LO-phonon-assisted scattering is the dominant polariton relaxation mechanism at the BIC energy
    Injected into Eq. (2) via the W_LO term; assumed based on previous GaN work [66,67].
  • ad hoc to paper The approximate width formula δkx ~ 1/(ξ−ℓ) (Eq. 1) is valid for the reservoir parameters used
    The Supplement fits this analytical form to GPE simulations for particular reservoir shapes; the paper notes deviations are expected at higher energies.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Soliton formation in a bound state in the continuum GaN waveguide polariton laser." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LAJYJ3HE

@misc{pith2026251223368,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Soliton formation in a bound state in the continuum GaN waveguide polariton laser},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LAJYJ3HE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2512.23368}
}
read the original abstract

We study polaritonic bound states in the continuum (BIC) created in GaN waveguides. The existence of symmetry-protected BICs is confirmed by the suppression of light emission and the observation of a polarization vortex in momentum space. Upon increasing the pumping, polariton population accumulates at the BIC and we observe polariton lasing from the blueshifted BIC states. The assessment of the polariton BIC emission energy and of its real and momentum space wavefunctions as a function of pumping power, i.e. of polariton density, indicates the formation of a bright soliton above the lasing threshold. Soliton formation at the BIC is induced by the combination of negative mass BIC and of repulsive polariton-polariton and polariton-reservoir interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.23368 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Bound state in continuum in a GaN polariton waveg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The BIC properties. (a) Intensity of emission as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Panel (a) shows experimental PL emission in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. BIC solitons. Experimental (a,b,c) and theoretical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Substrate-engineered tunable bound states in the continuum and directional radiation in dielectric metasurfaces

    physics.optics 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Multilayer substrates in dielectric metasurfaces enable tunable high-Q BICs by controlling guided-mode matching and out-of-plane symmetry breaking.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [60]

    Septembre, I

    I. Septembre, I. Foudjo, V. Develay, T. Guillet, S. Bouchoule, J. Zúñiga-Pérez, D. D. Solnyshkov, and G. Malpuech, Soliton formation in an exciton-polariton condensate at a bound state in the continuum, Physical Review B109, 205302 (2024)

    2024

  2. [1]

    C. W. Hsu, B. Zhen, A. D. Stone, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Bound states in the continuum, Nature Reviews Materials1, 1 (2016)

    2016

  3. [2]

    J. v. Neumann and E. P. Wigner, Über merkwürdige diskrete eigenwerte, Physikalische Zeitschrift30, 467 (1929)

    1929

  4. [3]

    Friedrich and D

    H. Friedrich and D. Wintgen, Interfering resonances and bound states in the continuum, Physical Review A32, 3231 (1985)

    1985

  5. [4]

    Sadrieva, K

    Z. Sadrieva, K. Frizyuk, M. Petrov, Y. Kivshar, and A. Bogdanov, Multipolar origin of bound states in the continuum, Phys. Rev. B100, 115303 (2019)

    2019

  6. [5]

    A. C. Overvig, S. C. Malek, M. J. Carter, S. Shrestha, and N. Yu, Selection rules for quasibound states in the continuum, Phys. Rev. B102, 035434 (2020)

    2020

  7. [6]

    B. Zhen, C. W. Hsu, L. Lu, A. D. Stone, and M. Sol- jačić, Topological nature of optical bound states in the continuum, Physical Review Letters113, 257401 (2014)

    2014

  8. [7]

    Dreisow, A

    F. Dreisow, A. Szameit, M. Heinrich, R. Keil, S. Nolte, A. Tünnermann, and S. Longhi, Adiabatic transfer of light via a continuum in optical waveguides, Optics let- ters34, 2405 (2009)

    2009

Show all 75 references
  1. [8]

    C. M. Gentry and M. A. Popović, Dark state lasers, Op- tics letters39, 4136 (2014)

    2014

  2. [9]

    Rybin and Y

    M. Rybin and Y. Kivshar, Supercavity lasing, Nature 541, 164 (2017)

    2017

  3. [10]

    Kodigala, T

    A. Kodigala, T. Lepetit, Q. Gu, B. Bahari, Y. Fainman, and B. Kanté, Lasing action from photonic bound states in continuum, Nature541, 196 (2017)

    2017

  4. [11]

    S. T. Ha, Y. H. Fu, N. K. Emani, Z. Pan, R. M. Bakker, R. Paniagua-Domínguez, and A. I. Kuznetsov, Direc- tional lasing in resonant semiconductor nanoantenna ar- rays, Nature nanotechnology13, 1042 (2018)

    2018

  5. [12]

    J. M. Foley and J. D. Phillips, Normal incidence narrow- band transmission filtering capabilities using symmetry- protected modes of a subwavelength, dielectric grating, Optics letters40, 2637 (2015)

    2015

  6. [13]

    J. M. Foley, S. M. Young, and J. D. Phillips, Symmetry- protected mode coupling near normal incidence for narrow-band transmission filtering in a dielectric grating, Physical Review B89, 165111 (2014)

    2014

  7. [14]

    H. M. Doeleman, F. Monticone, W. den Hollander, A. Alù, and A. F. Koenderink, Experimental observa- tion of a polarization vortex at an optical bound state in the continuum, Nature Photonics12, 397 (2018)

    2018

  8. [15]

    Yoda and M

    T. Yoda and M. Notomi, Generation and annihilation of topologically protected bound states in the continuum and circularly polarized states by symmetry breaking, Physical Review Letters125, 053902 (2020)

    2020

  9. [16]

    S. Shen, W. Liu, J. He, H. Chen, C. Xie, Q. Ge, G. Su, F. Liu, Y. Wang, G. Sun,et al., Topologically protected plasmonic bound states in the continuum, Nano Letters 24, 13285 (2024)

    2024

  10. [17]

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljačić, Topological photonics, Nature Photonics8, 821 (2014)

    2014

  11. [18]

    D. D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, P. St-Jean, S. Ravets, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Microcavity polaritons for topo- logical photonics, Optical Materials Express11, 1119 (2021)

    2021

  12. [19]

    K. Y. Bliokh, A. Niv, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, Ge- ometrodynamics of spinning light, Nature Photonics2, 748 (2008)

    2008

  13. [20]

    Zayats, Spin–orbit interactions of light, Nature Photonics 6 9, 796 (2015)

    K.Y.Bliokh, F.J.Rodríguez-Fortuño, F.Nori,andA.V. Zayats, Spin–orbit interactions of light, Nature Photonics 6 9, 796 (2015)

    2015

  14. [21]

    Gianfrate, O

    A. Gianfrate, O. Bleu, L. Dominici, V. Ardizzone, M. De Giorgi, D. Ballarini, G. Lerario, K. West, L. Pfeif- fer, D. D. Solnyshkov,et al., Measurement of the quan- tum geometric tensor and of the anomalous Hall drift, Nature578, 381 (2020)

    2020

  15. [22]

    M. Kang, T. Liu, C. Chan, and M. Xiao, Applications of bound states in the continuum in photonics, Nature Reviews Physics5, 659 (2023)

    2023

  16. [23]

    Y. Yu, A. Sakanas, A. R. Zali, E. Semenova, K. Yvind, and J. Mørk, Ultra-coherent fano laser based on a bound state in the continuum, Nature Photonics15, 758 (2021)

    2021

  17. [24]

    Z. Chen, X. Yin, J. Jin, Z. Zheng, Z. Zhang, F. Wang, L. He, B. Zhen, and C. Peng, Observation of miniaturized bound states in the continuum with ultra-high quality factors, Science Bulletin67, 359 (2022)

    2022

  18. [25]

    Hopfield, Theory of the contribution of excitons to the complex dielectric constant of crystals, Physical Review 112, 1555 (1958)

    J. Hopfield, Theory of the contribution of excitons to the complex dielectric constant of crystals, Physical Review 112, 1555 (1958)

    1958

  19. [26]

    Baas, J.-P

    A. Baas, J.-P. Karr, M. Romanelli, A. Bramati, and E. Giacobino, Optical bistability in semiconductor mi- crocavities in the nondegenerate parametric oscillation regime: Analogy with the optical parametric oscillator, Physical Review B70, 161307 (2004)

    2004

  20. [27]

    Emmanuele, M

    R. Emmanuele, M. Sich, O. Kyriienko, V. Shahnazaryan, F. Withers, A. Catanzaro, P. Walker, F. Benimetskiy, M. Skolnick, A. Tartakovskii,et al., Highly nonlinear trion-polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nature communications11, 3589 (2020)

    2020

  21. [28]

    D. N. Basov, A. Asenjo-Garcia, P. J. Schuck, X. Zhu, and A. Rubio, Polariton panorama, Nanophotonics10, 549 (2020)

    2020

  22. [29]

    Kasprzak, M

    J. Kasprzak, M. Richard, S. Kundermann, A. Baas, P. Jeambrun, J. M. J. Keeling, F. Marchetti, M. Szy- mańska, R. André, J. Staehli,et al., Bose–Einstein con- densation of exciton polaritons, Nature443, 409 (2006)

    2006

  23. [30]

    A. Amo, J. Lefrère, S. Pigeon, C. Adrados, C. Ciuti, I. Carusotto, R. Houdré, E. Giacobino, and A. Bramati, Superfluidity of polaritons in semiconductor microcavi- ties, Nature Physics5, 805 (2009)

    2009

  24. [31]

    Kavokin, G

    A. Kavokin, G. Malpuech, and M. Glazov, Optical spin Hall effect, Physical Review Letters95, 136601 (2005)

    2005

  25. [32]

    Leyder, M

    C. Leyder, M. Romanelli, J. P. Karr, E. Giacobino, T. C. Liew, M. M. Glazov, A. V. Kavokin, G. Malpuech, and A. Bramati, Observation of the optical spin hall effect, Nature physics3, 628 (2007)

    2007

  26. [33]

    Christopoulos, G

    S. Christopoulos, G. B. H. von Högersthal, A. J. D. Grundy, P. G. Lagoudakis, A. V. Kavokin, J. J. Baum- berg, G. Christmann, R. Butté, E. Feltin, J.-F. Carlin, and N. Grandjean, Room-Temperature Polariton Las- ing in Semiconductor Microcavities, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 126405 (2007)

    2007

  27. [34]

    Lerario, A

    G. Lerario, A. Fieramosca, F. Barachati, D. Ballarini, K. S. Daskalakis, L. Dominici, M. De Giorgi, S. A. Maier, G. Gigli, S. Kéna-Cohen,et al., Room-temperature su- perfluidity in a polariton condensate, Nature Physics13, 837 (2017)

    2017

  28. [35]

    Liang, W

    J. Liang, W. Wen, F. Jin, Y. G. Rubo, T. C. Liew, and R. Su, Polariton spin hall effect in a rashba–dresselhaus regime at room temperature, Nature Photonics18, 357 (2024)

    2024

  29. [36]

    Xiong, Coherent optical spin hall transport for polaritonics at room temperature, Nature Materials24, 56 (2025)

    Y.Shi, Y.Gan, Y.Chen, Y.Wang, S.Ghosh, A.Kavokin, and Q. Xiong, Coherent optical spin hall transport for polaritonics at room temperature, Nature Materials24, 56 (2025)

    2025

  30. [37]

    Jacqmin, I

    T. Jacqmin, I. Carusotto, I. Sagnes, M. Abbarchi, D. D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, E. Galopin, A. Lemaître, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Direct observation of Dirac cones and a flatband in a honeycomb lattice for polaritons, Physical Review Letters112, 116402 (2014)

    2014

  31. [38]

    St-Jean, V

    P. St-Jean, V. Goblot, E. Galopin, A. Lemaître, T.Ozawa, L.LeGratiet, I.Sagnes, J.Bloch,andA.Amo, Lasing in topological edge states of a one-dimensional lat- tice, Nature Photonics11, 651 (2017)

    2017

  32. [39]

    Klembt, T

    S. Klembt, T. Harder, O. Egorov, K. Winkler, R. Ge, M. Bandres, M. Emmerling, L. Worschech, T. Liew, M. Segev,et al., Exciton-polariton topological insulator, Nature562, 552 (2018)

    2018

  33. [40]

    R. Su, S. Ghosh, J. Wang, S. Liu, C. Diederichs, T. C. Liew, and Q. Xiong, Observation of exciton polariton condensation in a perovskite lattice at room tempera- ture, Nature Physics16, 301 (2020)

    2020

  34. [41]

    D. D. Solnyshkov, T. Weiss, G. Malpuech, and N. A. Gippius, Polariton laser based on a ZnO photonic crystal slab, Applied Physics Letters99, 111110 (2011)

    2011

  35. [42]

    Kravtsov, E

    V. Kravtsov, E. Khestanova, F. A. Benimetskiy, T. Ivanova, A. K. Samusev, I. S. Sinev, D. Pidgayko, A. M. Mozharov, I. S. Mukhin, M. S. Lozhkin,et al., Nonlinear polaritons in a monolayer semiconductor cou- pled to optical bound states in the continuum, Light: Science & Applic...

    2020

  36. [43]

    N. H. M. Dang, S. Zanotti, E. Drouard, C. Chevalier, G. Trippé-Allard, M. Amara, E. Deleporte, V. Ardiz- zone, D. Sanvitto, L. C. Andreani,et al., Realization of polaritonic topological charge at room temperature using polariton bound states in the continuum from perovskite me...

    2022

  37. [44]

    Ardizzone, F

    V. Ardizzone, F. Riminucci, S. Zanotti, A. Gianfrate, M. Efthymiou-Tsironi, D. Suàrez-Forero, F. Todisco, M. De Giorgi, D. Trypogeorgos, G. Gigli,et al., Polari- ton Bose–Einstein condensate from a bound state in the continuum, Nature605, 447 (2022)

    2022

  38. [45]

    A. M. Berghuis, G. W. Castellanos, S. Murai, J. L. Pura, D. R. Abujetas, E. van Heijst, M. Ramezani, J. A. Sanchez-Gil, and J. G. Rivas, Room temperature exciton–polariton condensation in silicon metasurfaces emerging from bound states in the continuum, Nano let- ters23, 5603 (2023)

    2023

  39. [46]

    X. Wu, S. Zhang, J. Song, X. Deng, W. Du, X. Zeng, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Y. Chen, Y. Wang,et al., Exciton polariton condensation from bound states in the contin- uum at room temperature, Nature Communications15, 3345 (2024)

    2024

  40. [47]

    X. Yan, M. Tang, Z. Zhou, L. Ma, Y. Vaynzof, J. Yao, H. Dong, and Y. S. Zhao, Topologically reconfigurable room-temperature polariton condensates from bound states in the continuum in organic metasurfaces, Nature Communications16, 1 (2025)

    2025

  41. [48]

    C. Luo, W. Li, J. Li, Z. Fu, N. Hu, Z. Yu, W. Chang, P. Li, X. Huang, B. Liu,et al., Room-temperature ex- citon polaritons in monolayer ws2 enabled by plasmonic bound states in the continuum, Nano Letters25, 4361 (2025)

    2025

  42. [49]

    Trypogeorgos, A

    D. Trypogeorgos, A. Gianfrate, M. Landini, D. Nigro, D. Gerace, I. Carusotto, F. Riminucci, K. W. Baldwin, L. N. Pfeiffer, G. I. Martone,et al., Emerging superso- lidity in photonic-crystal polariton condensates, Nature S7 639, 337 (2025)

    2025

  43. [50]

    J. Yang, B. A. Malomed, D. J. Kaup, and A. Champneys, Embedded solitons: a new type of solitary wave, Mathe- matics and computers in Simulation56, 585 (2001)

    2001

  44. [51]

    E. N. Bulgakov and A. F. Sadreev, Bound states in pho- tonicfabry-perotresonatorwithnonlinearoff-channelde- fects, Phys. Rev. B81, 115128 (2010)

    2010

  45. [52]

    S. D. Krasikov, A. A. Bogdanov, and I. V. Iorsh, Nonlin- ear bound states in the continuum of a one-dimensional photonic crystal slab, Phys. Rev. B97, 224309 (2018)

    2018

  46. [53]

    Dolinina and A

    D. Dolinina and A. Yulin, Bic-solitons in one-dimensional photonic crystal slab, inJournal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1461 (IOP Publishing, 2020) p. 012030

    2020

  47. [54]

    Z. Hu, D. Bongiovanni, D. Jukić, E. Jajtić, S. Xia, D. Song, J. Xu, R. Morandotti, H. Buljan, and Z. Chen, Nonlinear control of photonic higher-order topological bound states in the continuum, Light: Science & Ap- plications10, 164 (2021)

    2021

  48. [55]

    Dolinina and A

    D. Dolinina and A. Yulin, Interactions of the solitons in periodic driven-dissipative systems supporting quasi- bound states in the continuum, Physical Review E104, 054214 (2021)

    2021

  49. [56]

    Riminucci, A

    F. Riminucci, A. Gianfrate, D. Nigro, V. Ardizzone, S. Dhuey, L. Francaviglia, K. Baldwin, L. N. Pfeiffer, D. Ballarini, D. Trypogeorgos, A. Schwartzberg,et al., Polariton condensation in gap-confined states of photonic crystal waveguides, Physical Review Letters131, 246901 (2023)

    2023

  50. [57]

    Grudinina, M

    A. Grudinina, M. Efthymiou-Tsironi, V. Ardizzone, F. Riminucci, M. D. Giorgi, D. Trypogeorgos, K. Bald- win, L. Pfeiffer, D. Ballarini, D. Sanvitto,et al., Collec- tive excitations of a bound-in-the-continuum condensate, Nature Communications14, 3464 (2023)

    2023

  51. [58]

    Riminucci, M

    A.Gianfrate, H.Sigurðsson, V.Ardizzone, H.C.Nguyen, F. Riminucci, M. Efthymiou-Tsironi, K. W. Baldwin, L. N. Pfeiffer, D. Trypogeorgos, M. De Giorgi,et al., Reconfigurable quantum fluid molecules of bound states in the continuum, Nature Physics , 1 (2024)

    2024

  52. [59]

    A. M. Berghuis, A. Boom, R. P. Argante, S. Murai, and J. Gomez Rivas, Condensation of exciton–polaritons in a bound state in the continuum: effects of the excitation spot size and polariton transport, ACS nano18, 31987 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Semond, I

    F. Semond, I. Sellers, F. Natali, D. Byrne, M. Leroux, J. Massies, N. Ollier, J. Leymarie, P. Disseix, and A. Vas- son, Strong light-matter coupling at room temperature in simple geometry gan microcavities grown on silicon, Ap- plied Physics Letters87(2005)

    2005

  54. [62]

    Brimont, L

    C. Brimont, L. Doyennette, G. Kreyder, F. Réveret, P. Disseix, F. Médard, J. Leymarie, E. Cambril, S. Bou- choule, M. Gromovyi,et al., Strong coupling of exciton- polaritons in a bulk GaN planar waveguide: Quantify- ing the coupling strength, Physical Review Applied14, 054060 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    Bouchoule,HDR:TECHNOLOGIES POUR SOURCES LASER A SEMICONDUCTEURS III- V, Ph.D

    S. Bouchoule,HDR:TECHNOLOGIES POUR SOURCES LASER A SEMICONDUCTEURS III- V, Ph.D. thesis, Université ParisSud XI (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    Souissi, M

    H. Souissi, M. Gromovyi, T. Gueye, C. Brimont, L. Doyennette, D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, E. Cam- bril, S. Bouchoule, B. Alloing, S. Rennesson, F. Semond, J. Zúñiga Pérez, and T. Guillet, Ridge polariton laser: Differentfromasemiconductoredge-emittinglaser,Phys. Rev. Applied18...

    2022

  57. [65]

    See Supplemental Material at [xurl will be inserted by publisher]

  58. [66]

    Levrat, R

    J. Levrat, R. Butté, E. Feltin, J.-F. m. c. Carlin, N. Grandjean, D. Solnyshkov, and G. Malpuech, Conden- sation phase diagram of cavity polaritons in GaN-based microcavities: Experiment and theory, Phys. Rev. B81, 125305 (2010)

    2010

  59. [67]

    Jamadi, F

    O. Jamadi, F. Réveret, E. Mallet, P. Disseix, F. Médard, M. Mihailovic, D. D. Solnyshkov, G. Malpuech, J. Ley- marie, X.Lafosse,et al.,Polaritoncondensationphasedi- agram in wide-band-gap planar microcavities: GaN ver- sus ZnO, Physical Review B93, 115205 (2016)

    2016

  60. [68]

    Tanese, H

    D. Tanese, H. Flayac, D. D. Solnyshkov, A. Amo, A. Lemaître, E. Galopin, R. Braive, P. Senellart, I. Sagnes, G. Malpuech,et al., Polariton condensation in solitonic gap states in a one-dimensional periodic po- tential, Nature Communications4, 1749 (2013)

    2013

  61. [69]

    Pitaevskii and S

    L. Pitaevskii and S. Stringari,Bose-Einstein Condensa- tion(Oxford Science Publications - International Series of Monographs on Physics 116, 2003)

    2003

  62. [70]

    Ciers, D

    J. Ciers, D. D. Solnyshkov, G. Callsen, Y. Kuang, J.-F. Carlin, G. Malpuech, R. Butté, and N. Grandjean, Po- lariton relaxation and polariton nonlinearities in nonres- onantly cw-pumped III-nitride slab waveguides, Physical Review B102, 155304 (2020)

    2020

  63. [71]

    Souissi, M

    H. Souissi, M. Gromovyi, I. Septembre, V. Develay, C. Brimont, L. Doyennette, E. Cambril, S. Bouchoule, B. Alloing, E. Frayssinet,et al., Mode-locked waveguide polariton laser, Optica11, 962 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Peccianti, C

    M. Peccianti, C. Conti, G. Assanto, A. De Luca, and C. Umeton, All-optical switching and logic gating with spatial solitons in liquid crystals, Applied Physics Letters 81, 3335 (2002)

    2002

  65. [73]

    Sedov, A

    E. Sedov, A. Alodjants, S. Arakelian, Y.-L. Chuang, Y. Lin, W.-X. Yang, and R.-K. Lee, Tunneling-assisted optical information storage with lattice polariton soli- tons in cavity-qed arrays, Physical Review A89, 033828 (2014)

    2014

  66. [74]

    M. Pang, W. He, X. Jiang, and P. S. J. Russell, All- optical bit storage in a fibre laser by optomechani- cally bound states of solitons, Nature Photonics10, 454 (2016)

    2016

  67. [75]

    T. Herr, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, Dissi- pative kerr solitons in optical microresonators, Nonlinear optical cavity dynamics: from microresonators to fiber lasers , 129 (2016). SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIALS In this Supplementary, we present additional experi- mental...

    2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.