REVIEW 1 cited by
Constraints on the Local Cosmic Void from the Pantheon Supernovae Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Constraints on the Local Cosmic Void from the Pantheon Supernovae Data
read the original abstract
In principle, the local cosmic void can be simply modeled by the spherically symmetric Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi (LTB) metric. In practice, the real local cosmic void is probably not spherically symmetric. In this paper, to reconstruct a more realistic profile of the local cosmic void, we divide it into several segments. Each segment with certain solid angle is modeled by its own LTB metric. Meanwhile, we divide the 1048 type Ia supernovae (SNIa) of the Pantheon Survey into corresponding subsets according to their distribution in the galactic coordinate system. Obviously, each SNIa subset can only be used to reconstruct the profile of one segment. Finally, we can patch together an irregular profile for the local cosmic void with the whole Pantheon sample. Note that, the paucity of each data subset lead us to focus on the inner part of each void segment and assume that the half radii of the void segments are sufficient to constrain the whole segment. We find that, despite $2\sigma$ signals of anisotropy limited to the depth of the void segments, the constraints on every void segment are consistent with $\Lambda$CDM model at $95\%$ CL. Moreover, our constraints are too weak to challenge the cosmic homogeneity and isotropy.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Can cosmic voids ease the Hubble tension? Local expansion in $w_0w_a$CDM
A KBC-like local void lowers the SH0ES–Planck Hubble tension to about 2σ but cannot fully resolve it, and evolving dark energy shifts the required void depth by only ~1%.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.