pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.00258 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · physics.flu-dyn

Self-diffusiophoretic propulsion in wedge confinement: The role of phoretic interactions

Abdallah Daddi-Moussa-Ider , Ramin Golestanian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 18:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft physics.flu-dyn
keywords self-diffusiophoresiswedge confinementphoretic interactionsmethod of imagesconcentration fieldmicrofluidicsconfined geometries
0
0 comments X

The pith

Wedge confinement alters both speed and direction of self-diffusiophoretic particles via concentration reflections.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates the motion of a catalytically active sphere inside a wedge by solving the concentration field that the particle itself creates. It uses the Fourier-Kontorovich-Lebedev transform to handle the Laplace equation and applies the method of images to capture first and second reflections from the walls, keeping only the monopole and dipole parts of the surface activity. The resulting far-field phoretic velocity depends on the wedge opening angle and the particle's distance from the apex. These geometric effects can increase, decrease, or reverse the particle's speed relative to the unconfined case. The work supplies explicit formulas for the velocity contributions that arise purely from the disturbed concentration field near the corner.

Core claim

In the diffusion-dominated regime the phoretic velocity is obtained from the reflected concentration field computed with the Fourier-Kontorovich-Lebedev transform and the method of images; the monopole and dipole contributions produce leading-order velocity expressions whose magnitude and direction vary with wedge opening angle and particle position inside the domain.

What carries the argument

Fourier-Kontorovich-Lebedev transform together with the method of images applied to the monopole and dipole terms of the surface activity to construct the reflected concentration field.

If this is right

  • The phoretic velocity magnitude changes with wedge opening angle.
  • The direction of motion can reverse depending on the particle's position inside the wedge.
  • Near-corner concentration disturbances supply a calculable contribution to the total propulsion.
  • The same image-construction approach supplies a systematic route for velocity calculations in other confined microfluidic geometries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same transform-plus-image procedure can be extended to other corner-like confinements such as tapered channels.
  • Experiments that vary wedge angle while tracking particle trajectories would directly test the predicted velocity formulas.
  • Adding hydrodynamic interactions would rescale the quantitative velocities while leaving the geometric dependence on angle and position intact.

Load-bearing premise

Hydrodynamic effects can be neglected so that velocity is determined solely by the reflected concentration field in the diffusion-dominated limit.

What would settle it

Measure the propulsion velocity vector of a catalytically active particle at several distances from the apex inside wedges of different opening angles and check whether the observed direction changes match the sign predicted by the image-reflected concentration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.00258 by Abdallah Daddi-Moussa-Ider, Ramin Golestanian.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A catalytically active particle of radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Contour plots of the scaled monopole concentration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Contour plots of the scaled monopole concentration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Contour plots of the scaled dipole concentration field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Contour plots of the scaled dipole concentration field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Scaled phoretic velocity induced by a source monopole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Axial component of the scaled phoretic velocity arising [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Variation of the scaled in-plane velocity arising from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the self-diffusiophoretic motion of a catalytically active spherical particle confined within a wedge-shaped domain. Using the Fourier-Kontorovich-Lebedev transform, we solve the Laplace equation for the concentration field in the diffusion-dominated regime. The method of images is employed to obtain the first and second reflections of the concentration field, accounting for both monopole and dipole contributions of the particle's surface activity. Based on these results, we derive leading-order expressions for the self-induced phoretic velocity in the far-field limit and examine how it varies with the wedge opening angle and the particle's position within the domain. We focus on the contributions to the phoretic velocities arising from phoretic interactions, without accounting for hydrodynamic effects. Our findings reveal that the wedge geometry significantly affects both the magnitude and direction of particle motion. Our study provides a systematic framework for calculating the contributions to the phoretic velocity arising from concentration disturbances near corners, with implications for microfluidic design and control of autophoretic particles in confined geometries.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates self-diffusiophoretic motion of a catalytically active spherical particle confined in a wedge-shaped domain. It solves the Laplace equation for the concentration field via the Fourier-Kontorovich-Lebedev transform, applies the method of images for first- and second-order monopole and dipole reflections, and derives leading-order far-field phoretic velocity expressions that depend on wedge opening angle and particle position. The analysis explicitly restricts itself to phoretic interactions and omits hydrodynamic effects, concluding that wedge geometry significantly alters both the magnitude and direction of motion.

Significance. If the phoretic-only results hold within their stated regime, the work supplies a systematic, transform-based framework for computing concentration-induced velocity contributions near corners, which is useful for microfluidic design of autophoretic particles. The parameter-free character of the image-reflected solutions and the explicit far-field asymptotics are technical strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the velocity-derivation section: the central claim that wedge geometry reverses the direction of motion is obtained solely from the phoretic slip velocity computed via concentration reflections; no quantitative regime estimate (e.g., bounds on Péclet number, Damköhler number, or confinement ratio) is supplied to show that wall-induced Stokes flow remains negligible, so the reported direction changes may not survive once hydrodynamic drag and pressure-driven flows are restored.
  2. [Methods] The diffusion-dominated assumption underlying the Laplace-equation solution: without explicit error bounds or comparison to the full advection-diffusion-Stokes problem, it is unclear whether the leading-order velocity expressions remain predictive for experimentally accessible wedge angles and particle-wall separations.
minor comments (2)
  1. Define all symbols appearing in the image-reflection formulae (e.g., the precise form of the Kontorovich-Lebedev kernel and the dipole strength) at first use.
  2. Add a brief paragraph comparing the present phoretic-only results to existing hydrodynamic treatments of autophoretic particles in wedges or channels.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. Our manuscript is explicitly restricted to phoretic interactions in the diffusion-dominated regime, as stated throughout the text. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the velocity-derivation section: the central claim that wedge geometry reverses the direction of motion is obtained solely from the phoretic slip velocity computed via concentration reflections; no quantitative regime estimate (e.g., bounds on Péclet number, Damköhler number, or confinement ratio) is supplied to show that wall-induced Stokes flow remains negligible, so the reported direction changes may not survive once hydrodynamic drag and pressure-driven flows are restored.

    Authors: The manuscript explicitly omits hydrodynamic effects and focuses on phoretic contributions from reflected concentration fields, as noted in the abstract and introduction. The direction reversal is therefore a phoretic effect within this approximation. We agree that a regime discussion strengthens the presentation. In the revision we will add a paragraph with order-of-magnitude estimates (Pe ≪ 1, typical Damköhler numbers for catalytic particles, and far-field confinement ratios) drawn from the experimental literature to delineate where the phoretic-only results are expected to dominate. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods] The diffusion-dominated assumption underlying the Laplace-equation solution: without explicit error bounds or comparison to the full advection-diffusion-Stokes problem, it is unclear whether the leading-order velocity expressions remain predictive for experimentally accessible wedge angles and particle-wall separations.

    Authors: The Laplace-equation solution is derived under the standard diffusion-dominated limit (Pe ≪ 1) appropriate for many autophoretic systems. We will expand the methods section to include a short discussion of the validity conditions, referencing characteristic experimental parameters for wedge angles and separations where advection remains negligible relative to diffusion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct solution of Laplace equation via transforms and images

full rationale

The derivation solves the concentration field from the Laplace equation subject to boundary conditions using the Fourier-Kontorovich-Lebedev transform and first/second image reflections for monopole and dipole terms. Leading-order phoretic velocity is then obtained directly from the resulting concentration gradients in the far-field limit. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no quantities are defined in terms of the outputs they produce, and no load-bearing self-citations reduce the central result to prior unverified work by the same authors. The explicit omission of hydrodynamic effects is a stated modeling choice rather than a hidden circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the concentration field can be solved independently of hydrodynamics in the diffusion limit, using linear superposition for reflections.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The system operates in the diffusion-dominated regime where the concentration field satisfies the Laplace equation.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the basis for the solution method.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5483 in / 1285 out tokens · 65915 ms · 2026-05-16T18:29:46.236341+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spectral methods for wedge and corner flows: The Fourier-Kontorovich-Lebedev integral transform

    physics.flu-dyn 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 1.0

    The paper reviews the Fourier-Kontorovich-Lebedev transform method for deriving solutions to Stokeslet and rotlet flows in wedge-shaped domains via harmonic function representations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    As given above in Eq

    Source monopole We first consider the first reflection of the source monopole. As given above in Eq. (18), the source monopole contribution to the concentration field in an unbounded fluid medium under a constant flux boundary condition at the surface of the active particle is given by c(0) M =q 0 R s .(24) In cylindrical coordinates, the distance from th...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Source dipole For the source dipole singularity, we proceed analogously by first expressing the bulk solution in FKL space and then matching the coefficients to satisfy the boundary conditions 6 (a) (b) Figure 2. Contour plots of the scaled monopole concentration field around an active particle in the radial-azimuthal plane for (a) an obtuse wedge withα=π...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Specifically, ∂ ∂s c(1) M +c (2) M s=R =O ϵ3 .(60) Using the solution forc (1) M from Eq

    Source monopole To satisfy the flux boundary condition on the surface of the active colloid, we require the normal gradients of the first and second reflections to vanish. Specifically, ∂ ∂s c(1) M +c (2) M s=R =O ϵ3 .(60) Using the solution forc (1) M from Eq. (34), together with the coordinate transformation equations in Eqs. (59), we obtain, to leading...

    work page

  4. [4]

    In this case, we require that ∂ ∂s c(1) D +c (2) D s=R =O ϵ4 .(67) The solution for the first reflection,c (1) D , is given by Eq

    Source dipole We follow analogous mathematical steps to determine the second reflection of the source dipole concentration field. In this case, we require that ∂ ∂s c(1) D +c (2) D s=R =O ϵ4 .(67) The solution for the first reflection,c (1) D , is given by Eq. (51), and its normal gradient, to leading order, is given by ∂c(1) D ∂s s=R =− q0 8 ϵ3 sin3(α−β)...

    work page

  5. [5]

    S. Chen, D. E. Fan, P. Fischer, A. Ghosh, K. G¨ opfrich, R. Golestanian, H. Hess, X. Ma, B. J. Nelson, T. Pati˜ no Padial, J. Tang, K. Villa, W. Wang, L. Zhang, A. Sen, and S. S´ anchez, A roadmap for next-generation nanomotors, Nat. Nanotechnol.20, 990 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Lauga and T

    E. Lauga and T. R. Powers, The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms, Rep. Prog. Phys.72, 096601 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Z¨ ottl and H

    A. Z¨ ottl and H. Stark, Emergent behavior in active colloids, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter28, 253001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Bechinger, R

    C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. L¨ owen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Active particles in complex and crowded environments, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 045006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Needleman and Z

    D. Needleman and Z. Dogic, Active matter at the interface between materials science and cell biology, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Z¨ ottl and H

    A. Z¨ ottl and H. Stark, Modeling active colloids: from active brownian particles to hydrodynamic and chemical fields, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.14, 109 (2023)

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Te Vrugt and R

    M. Te Vrugt and R. Wittkowski, Metareview: a survey of active matter reviews, Eur. Phys. J. E48, 12 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Gompper, R

    G. Gompper, R. G. Winkler, T. Speck, A. Solon, C. Nardini, F. Peruani, H. L¨ owen, R. Golestanian, U. B. Kaupp, L. Alvarez, T. Kiørboe, E. Lauga, W. C. K. Poon, A. DeSimone, S. Mui˜ nos-Landin, A. Fischer, N. A. S¨ oker, F. Cichos, R. Kapral, P. Gaspard, M. Ripoll, F. Sagues, A. Doostmohammadi, J. M. Yeomans, I. S. Aranson, C. Bechinger, H. Stark, C. K. H...

    work page 2020

  13. [13]

    X. Ju, C. Chen, C. M. Oral, S. Sevim, R. Golestanian, M. Sun, N. Bouzari, X. Lin, M. Urso, J. S. Nam, Y. Cho, X. Peng, F. C. Landers, S. Yang, A. Adibi, N. Taz, R. Wittkowski, D. Ahmed, W. Wang, V. Magdanz, M. Medina-S´ anchez, M. Guix, N. Bari, B. Behkam, R. Kapral, Y. Huang, J. Tang, B. Wang, K. Morozov, A. Leshansky, S. A. Abbasi, H. Choi, S. Ghosh, B....

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    B.-W. Park, J. Zhuang, O. Yasa, and M. Sitti, Multifunctional bacteria-driven microswimmers for targeted active drug delivery, ACS Nano11, 8910 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    S. Tang, F. Zhang, H. Gong, F. Wei, J. Zhuang, E. Karshalev, B. Esteban-Fern´ andez de ´Avila, C. Huang, Z. Zhou, Z. Li,et al., Enzyme-powered janus platelet cell robots for active and targeted drug delivery, Sci. Robot.5, eaba6137 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    F. Soto, J. Wang, R. Ahmed, and U. Demirci, Medical micro/nanorobots in precision medicine, Adv. Sci.7, 2002203 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Llacer-Wintle, A

    J. Llacer-Wintle, A. Rivas-Dapena, X.-Z. Chen, E. Pellicer, B. J. Nelson, J. Puigmart´ ı-Luis, and S. Pan´ e, Biodegradable small-scale swimmers for biomedical applications, Adv. Mater.33, 2102049 (2021). 16

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Golestanian, Collective behavior of thermally active colloids, Phys

    R. Golestanian, Collective behavior of thermally active colloids, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 038303 (2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    Theurkauff, C

    I. Theurkauff, C. Cottin-Bizonne, J. Palacci, C. Ybert, and L. Bocquet, Dynamic clustering in active colloidal suspensions with chemical signaling, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 268303 (2012)

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Pohl and H

    O. Pohl and H. Stark, Dynamic clustering and chemotactic collapse of self-phoretic active particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 238303 (2014)

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    S. Saha, R. Golestanian, and S. Ramaswamy, Clusters, asters, and collective oscillations in chemotactic colloids, Phys. Rev. E89, 062316 (2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Soto and R

    R. Soto and R. Golestanian, Self-assembly of active colloidal molecules with dynamic function, Phys. Rev. E91, 052304 (2015)

    work page 2015

  23. [23]

    Liebchen and H

    B. Liebchen and H. L¨ owen, Synthetic chemotaxis and collective behavior in active matter, Acc. Chem. Res.51, 2982 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    R. Golestanian, Phoretic active matter, inActive Matter and Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 112, September 2018 (Oxford University Press, 2022)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    J. L. Moran and J. D. Posner, Phoretic self-propulsion, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.49, 511 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Illien, R

    P. Illien, R. Golestanian, and A. Sen, Fuelled motion: phoretic motility and collective behaviour of active colloids, Chem. Soc. Rev.46, 5508 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    and Liverpool, T

    Golestanian, R. and Liverpool, T. B. and Ajdari, A., Propulsion of a molecular machine by asymmetric distribution of reaction products, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 220801 (2005)

    work page 2005

  28. [28]

    Golestanian, T

    R. Golestanian, T. B. Liverpool, and A. Ajdari, Designing phoretic micro-and nano-swimmers, New J. Phys.9, 126 (2007)

    work page 2007

  29. [29]

    Sharifi-Mood, J

    N. Sharifi-Mood, J. Koplik, and C. Maldarelli, Diffusiophoretic self-propulsion of colloids driven by a surface reaction: The sub-micron particle regime for exponential and van der waals interactions, Phys. Fluids 25, 012001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    Michelin and E

    S. Michelin and E. Lauga, Phoretic self-propulsion at finite P´ eclet numbers, J. Fluid Mech.747, 572 (2014)

    work page 2014

  31. [31]

    S. Das, A. Garg, A. I. Campbell, J. Howse, A. Sen, D. Velegol, R. Golestanian, and S. J. Ebbens, Boundaries can steer active Janus spheres, Nature Commun.6, 8999 (2015)

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    and Liverpool, T

    Ibrahim, Y. and Liverpool, T. B., The dynamics of a self- phoretic Janus swimmer near a wall, Europhys. Lett.111, 48008 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Ibrahim and T

    Y. Ibrahim and T. B. Liverpool, How walls affect the dynamics of self-phoretic microswimmers, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics225, 1843 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    W. E. Uspal, M. N. Popescu, S. Dietrich, and M. Tasinkevych, Guiding catalytically active particles with chemically patterned surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 048002 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Mozaffari, N

    A. Mozaffari, N. Sharifi-Mood, J. Koplik, and C. Maldarelli, Self-diffusiophoretic colloidal propulsion near a solid boundary, Phys. Fluids28, 053107 (2016)

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Bayati, M

    P. Bayati, M. N. Popescu, W. E. Uspal, S. Dietrich, and A. Najafi, Dynamics near planar walls for various model self- phoretic particles, Soft Matter15, 5644 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Varma and S

    A. Varma and S. Michelin, Modeling chemo-hydrodynamic interactions of phoretic particles: A unified framework, Phys. Rev. Fluids4, 124204 (2019)

    work page 2019

  38. [38]

    Sharan, A

    P. Sharan, A. Daddi-Moussa-Ider, J. Agudo-Canalejo, R. Golestanian, and J. Simmchen, Pair interaction between two catalytically active colloids, Small19, 2300817 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Ouazan-Reboul, J

    V. Ouazan-Reboul, J. Agudo-Canalejo, and R. Golestanian, Self-organization of primitive metabolic cycles due to non- reciprocal interactions, Nat. Commun.14, 4496 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Soto and R

    R. Soto and R. Golestanian, Self-assembly of catalytically active colloidal molecules: tailoring activity through surface chemistry, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 068301 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    Michelin and E

    S. Michelin and E. Lauga, Autophoretic locomotion from geometric asymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. E38, 7 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Varma, T

    A. Varma, T. D. Montenegro-Johnson, and S. Michelin, Clustering-induced self-propulsion of isotropic autophoretic particles, Soft Matter14, 7155 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Picella and S

    F. Picella and S. Michelin, Confined self-propulsion of an isotropic active colloid, J. Fluid Mech.933, A27 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Nasouri and R

    B. Nasouri and R. Golestanian, Exact phoretic interaction of two chemically active particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 168003 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Michelin, T

    S. Michelin, T. D. Montenegro-Johnson, G. De Canio, N. Lobato-Dauzier, and E. Lauga, Geometric pumping in autophoretic channels, Soft Matter11, 5804 (2015)

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    Lisicki, S

    M. Lisicki, S. Michelin, and E. Lauga, Phoretic flow induced by asymmetric confinement, J. Fluid Mech.799, R5 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    Nowak and M

    D. Nowak and M. Lisicki, Diffusioosmotic corner flows, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18233 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Malgaretti, M

    P. Malgaretti, M. Popescu, and S. Dietrich, Self- diffusiophoresis induced by fluid interfaces, Soft Matter14, 1375 (2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    Daddi-Moussa-Ider, A

    A. Daddi-Moussa-Ider, A. Vilfan, and R. Golestanian, Diffusiophoretic propulsion of an isotropic active colloidal particle near a finite-sized disk embedded in a planar fluid– fluid interface, J. Fluid Mech.940, A12 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Kaiser, H

    A. Kaiser, H. Wensink, and H. L¨ owen, How to capture active particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 268307 (2012)

    work page 2012

  51. [51]

    Sano and H

    O. Sano and H. Hasimoto, Slow motion of a spherical particle in a viscous fluid bounded by two perpendicular walls, J. Phys. Soc. Japan40, 884 (1976)

    work page 1976

  52. [52]

    Sano and H

    O. Sano and H. Hasimoto, Slow motion of a small sphere in a viscous fluid in a corner i. motion on and across the bisector of a wedge, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.42, 306 (1977)

    work page 1977

  53. [53]

    Sano and H

    O. Sano and H. Hasimoto, The effect of two plane walls on the motion of a small sphere in a viscous fluid, J. Fluid Mech. 87, 673 (1978)

    work page 1978

  54. [54]

    Hasimoto and O

    H. Hasimoto and O. Sano, Stokeslets and eddies in creeping flow, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.12, 335 (1980)

    work page 1980

  55. [55]

    Sano,Slow motion of a small sphere in a viscous fluid bounded by two plane walls, Ph.d

    O. Sano,Slow motion of a small sphere in a viscous fluid bounded by two plane walls, Ph.d. thesis, University of Tokyo (1977)

    work page 1977

  56. [56]

    Dauparas and E

    J. Dauparas and E. Lauga, Leading-order stokes flows near a corner, IMA J. Appl. Math.83, 590 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    Dauparas,Stokes flows near boundaries: bacteria, corners, and pumps, Ph.D

    J. Dauparas,Stokes flows near boundaries: bacteria, corners, and pumps, Ph.D. thesis (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    A. R. Sprenger and A. M. Menzel, Microswimming under a wedge-shaped confinement, Phys. Fluids35(2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Daddi-Moussa-Ider, L

    A. Daddi-Moussa-Ider, L. Fischer, M. Pradas, and A. M. Menzel, Elastic displacements and viscous hydrodynamic flows in wedge-shaped geometries with a straight edge: Green’s functions for parallel forces, Proc. R. Soc. A481, 20250353 (2025). 17

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    Daddi-Moussa-Ider and A

    A. Daddi-Moussa-Ider and A. M. Menzel, Elastic displacements and viscous flows in wedge-shaped geometries with a straight edge: Green’s functions for perpendicular forces, J. Elast.157, 54 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Happel and H

    J. Happel and H. Brenner,Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics: With Special Applications to Particulate Media(Springer Science & Business Media, The Netherlands, 2012)

    work page 2012

  62. [62]

    Kim and S

    S. Kim and S. J. Karrila,Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications(Dover Publications, Mineola, 2013)

    work page 2013

  63. [63]

    H. A. Stone and A. D. T. Samuel, Propulsion of microorganisms by surface distortions, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 4102 (1996)

    work page 1996

  64. [64]

    Kontorovich and N

    M. Kontorovich and N. Lebedev, On the one method of solution for some problems in diffraction theory and related problems, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. U.S.S.R.8, 1192 (1938)

    work page 1938

  65. [65]

    Kontorovich and N

    M. Kontorovich and N. Lebedev, On a method of solution of some problems of the diffraction theory, J. Phys. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R.1, 1 (1939)

    work page 1939

  66. [66]

    Lebedev and M

    N. Lebedev and M. Kontorovich, On the application of inversion formulae to the solution of some electrodynamics problems, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. U.S.S.R.9, 729 (1939)

    work page 1939

  67. [67]

    N. N. Lebedev, On an inversion formula, Doklady Akademii Nauk52, 395 (1946)

    work page 1946

  68. [68]

    N. N. Lebedev, On the representation of an arbitrary function by an integral involving cylinder functions of imaginary index and argument, Prikl. Matem. Mekh.13, 465 (1949)

    work page 1949

  69. [69]

    Erd´ elyi, W

    A. Erd´ elyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, , and F. Tricomi, Higher Transcendental Functions, Vol. vol. II (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953)

    work page 1953

  70. [70]

    Lowndes, An application of the Kontorovich-Lebedev transform, Proc

    J. Lowndes, An application of the Kontorovich-Lebedev transform, Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc.11, 135 (1959)

    work page 1959

  71. [71]

    Rawlins, Diffraction by, or diffusion into, a penetrable wedge, Proc

    A. Rawlins, Diffraction by, or diffusion into, a penetrable wedge, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.455, 2655 (1999)

    work page 1999

  72. [72]

    Y. A. Antipov, Diffraction of a plane wave by a circular cone with an impedance boundary condition, SIAM J. Appl. Math.62, 1122 (2002)

    work page 2002

  73. [73]

    M. A. Salem, A. H. Kamel, and A. V. Osipov, Electromagnetic fields in the presence of an infinite dielectric wedge, Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.462, 2503 (2006)

    work page 2006

  74. [74]

    Waechter, Steady rotation of a body of revolution in a conducting fluid, inMath

    R. Waechter, Steady rotation of a body of revolution in a conducting fluid, inMath. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., Vol. 65 (Cambridge University Press, 1969) pp. 329–350

    work page 1969

  75. [75]

    Waechter, Steady magnetohydrodynamic flow in an insulating circular pipe, Mathematika16, 249 (1969)

    R. Waechter, Steady magnetohydrodynamic flow in an insulating circular pipe, Mathematika16, 249 (1969)

    work page 1969

  76. [76]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun,Handbook of Mathematical Functions, 5 (Dover, New York, 1972)

    work page 1972

  77. [77]

    and Magnus, W

    Erd´ elyi, A. and Magnus, W. and Oberhettinger, F. and Tricomi, F. G.,Tables of Integral Transforms: Vol.: 2 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1954)

    work page 1954

  78. [78]

    Prudnikov, Y

    A. Prudnikov, Y. Brychkov, and O. Marichev,Integrals and Series, Volume 2: Special Functions(1992)

    work page 1992

  79. [79]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik,Table of Integrals, Series, and Products(Academic press, London, 2014)

    work page 2014

  80. [80]

    Yariv, E., Wall-induced self-diffusiophoresis of active isotropic colloids, Phys. Rev. Fluids1, 032101 (2016)

    work page 2016

Showing first 80 references.