pith. machine review for the scientific record.
sign in

arxiv: 2601.01354 · v1 · submitted 2026-01-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recent Progress in Ultrafast Dynamics of Transition-Metal Compounds Studied by Time-Resolved X-ray Techniques

Hiroki Wadati , Kohei Yamamoto , Kohei Yamagami This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 18:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords ultrafast dynamicstransition-metal compoundstime-resolved X-ray spectroscopyX-ray free-electron lasershigh-harmonic generationdemagnetizationspin-state transitionsresonant soft X-ray scattering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Time-resolved X-ray absorption and scattering now give element-specific access to ultrafast charge, spin, and lattice dynamics in transition-metal compounds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review explains how femtosecond X-ray sources extend absorption spectroscopy, magnetic circular dichroism, and resonant scattering into the time domain. These methods supply the elemental and orbital selectivity that optical techniques lack, allowing separation of coupled responses in complex materials. The paper focuses on pump-probe results for laser-driven demagnetization, spin-state transitions, and valence or structural changes, while also covering tabletop high-harmonic sources and their link to large-scale facilities.

Core claim

Time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy, X-ray magnetic circular dichroism, and resonant soft X-ray scattering provide direct, complementary access to element- and momentum-resolved ultrafast dynamics, as shown in recent measurements of demagnetization, spin-state transitions, and valence or structural changes in transition-metal compounds.

What carries the argument

Pump-probe time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy (TR-XAS), X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD), and resonant soft X-ray scattering (RSXS) using XFEL and HHG sources for element-selective tracking of nonequilibrium charge, spin, orbital, and lattice evolution.

If this is right

  • These techniques separate the individual time scales of charge, spin, and lattice responses within one material.
  • Integration of tabletop HHG sources with XFEL facilities expands access to ultrafast experiments.
  • The methods support visualization of nonequilibrium states that govern ultrafast control of quantum materials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same element-selective approach could be applied to photo-induced phase transitions in other correlated systems to reveal hidden coupling pathways.
  • Combining these measurements with theoretical modeling of nonequilibrium states would allow quantitative prediction of control protocols.
  • Extension to higher momentum resolution might expose spatial inhomogeneities in ultrafast dynamics that current setups average over.

Load-bearing premise

The selected recent studies accurately represent the full scope of progress and limitations in the field without major omissions.

What would settle it

A controlled comparison in which time-resolved X-ray methods miss a major ultrafast process that optical probes detect in the same transition-metal sample would falsify the claim of direct complementary access.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.01354 by Hiroki Wadati, Kohei Yamagami, Kohei Yamamoto.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the diagram of the first-order perturbation of p · A, where panels (a) and (b) show X-ray absorption and fluorescence X-ray emission, respectively. The transition probability Tif from |i⟩ to |f⟩ is given by Fermi’s golden rule as: Tif ∝ | ⟨f| pj · A |i⟩ |2 δ(Ef − Ei − hω¯ ) (14) Here, the first factor gives the modulus square over the matrix element. The second factor is the delta distribution, which… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: summarizes the time structures of electron storage rings at various synchrotron radiation facilities [24]. The time structure is characterized by three main time constants: the round-trip time (Trev), the bunch interval (TRF ), and the bunch length or duration (Td). The round-trip time, Trev, for an electron bunch traveling at nearly the speed of light, is on the order of microseconds. The bunch interval, … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: [36]. FIG. 14. Three characteristic relaxation phases of optically excited electrons in metals [36]. (a) Photon absorption generates nonequilibrium electrons, which move with ballistic velocities. (b) At t = τth, electrons have equilibrated by electron-electron collisions, forming a Fermi distribution with a well-defined electron temperature Te. (c) Via electron–phonon coupling, the electrons come into eq… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: shows f(t) and h(t) for λ = 1 and σ = 0.4. In fitting the experimental results, Eq. (25) is used. !" "!# "!$ "!% "!& " '()*+,-()* / " & . % ) ,'()* ,-()* FIG. 16. f(t) and h(t) with finite temporal width used to model the instrumental response and convolution in pump–probe measurements. These functions are essential for quantitative fitting of ultrafast magnetization dynamics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/ful… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: shows the magnetic orders of the LSFO and SFO. In the LSFO, the average valence of Fe was 3.67+. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: FIG. 27 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_27.png] view at source ↗
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: FIG. 28 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_28.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

X-ray absorption spectroscopy and X-ray magnetic circular dichroism have long served as indispensable tools for probing the electronic and magnetic properties of transition-metal compounds with elemental selectivity. In recent years, the emergence of femtosecond lasers has opened a new avenue for studying nonequilibrium dynamics in condensed matter. However, conventional optical techniques lack elemental and orbital specificity, making it difficult to disentangle the coupled charge, spin, and lattice responses in complex materials. The development of X-ray free-electron lasers (XFEL) and laboratory high-harmonic generation (HHG) sources has enabled the extension of X-ray absorption and scattering techniques into the femtosecond time domain. Time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy, X-ray magnetic circular dichroism, and resonant soft X-ray scattering now provide direct, complementary access to element- and momentum-resolved ultrafast dynamics. This review summarizes recent progress in these techniques, focusing on pump-probe measurements of laser-induced demagnetization, spin-state transitions, and valence and structural changes in transition-metal compounds. We also discuss advances in tabletop HHG-based X-ray spectroscopy and its integration with large-scale XFEL facilities. These developments provide powerful routes for visualizing the nonequilibrium evolution of charge, spin, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom, offering new insights into the ultrafast control of quantum materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review article summarizing recent progress in ultrafast dynamics of transition-metal compounds using time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD), and resonant soft X-ray scattering. It focuses on pump-probe experiments enabled by XFEL and HHG sources to study laser-induced demagnetization, spin-state transitions, valence changes, and structural dynamics, highlighting element- and momentum-resolved access to charge, spin, orbital, and lattice degrees of freedom.

Significance. If the cited primary studies are accurately represented, the review provides a useful consolidation of how these X-ray techniques complement conventional optical methods by offering elemental selectivity and momentum resolution in nonequilibrium processes. It is particularly valuable for researchers working on quantum materials control, as it integrates advances in both large-scale XFEL facilities and tabletop HHG sources.

minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The general claims about complementary access to dynamics would be strengthened by naming one or two specific transition-metal compounds (e.g., a nickelate or manganite) as illustrative examples of the phenomena discussed.
  2. Throughout: Verify that all referenced experimental works include accurate summaries of their key quantitative findings (e.g., time scales or effect sizes) to maintain the review's reliability as a reference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary of our review and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were listed in the report, so we have no point-by-point revisions to address at this stage.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review of external literature

full rationale

This is a review summarizing capabilities of time-resolved XAS, XMCD, and resonant soft X-ray scattering drawn from cited external pump-probe studies on demagnetization, spin transitions, and valence changes. No derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or predictions appear in the text. Central claims rest on independent experimental literature rather than any self-referential reduction or self-citation chain. The structure is self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing internal steps that collapse to the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review article with no new derivations, parameters, or postulates; it relies on standard background knowledge in condensed-matter physics and X-ray techniques.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5545 in / 884 out tokens · 29993 ms · 2026-05-16T18:25:43.814139+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 112 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    The most successful ap- proach is HHG [ 30–32]

    High-harmonic generation In parallel with the development of XFELs, ultrafast X-ray sources have also made great progress due to dramatic advances in tabletop laser technology. The most successful ap- proach is HHG [ 30–32]. HHG is a nonlinear optical phenomenon that generates light at a high frequency, an integer multiple of the original laser frequency,...

    work page 2000

  2. [2]

    Unlike X-rays, neutron scattering cross-sections do not scale monotonically with atomic number, and neutrons couple directly to magnetic moments

    Complementarity with neutron scattering Recent advancements in neutron techniques provide information that is highly comple- mentary to X-ray–based approaches. Unlike X-rays, neutron scattering cross-sections do not scale monotonically with atomic number, and neutrons couple directly to magnetic moments. Owing to this sensitivity, neutron scattering has l...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Therefore, the laser first interacts with the sample, generating electron-hole pairs on a time scale of about 1 fs

    In the visible to infrared laser range, only electrons whose energy satisfies EF − hν < E < E F respond to laser irradiation and absorb photons almost instantly. Therefore, the laser first interacts with the sample, generating electron-hole pairs on a time scale of about 1 fs

    work page

  4. [4]

    The electron system equilibrates to high-temperature Te by electron-electron interac- tions within about 50-500 fs

    work page

  5. [5]

    25 Thus, after about 1 ps, the electron system and the lattice system are in thermal equilibrium with each other, i.e., Te = Tl

    The equilibrated electronic excitations heat the lattice and increase Tl on a time scale determined by the electron-lattice interaction time, which is about 100 fs - 1 ps. 25 Thus, after about 1 ps, the electron system and the lattice system are in thermal equilibrium with each other, i.e., Te = Tl. These three processes are summarized as panels (a)-(c) i...

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    H. Ueda, M. García-Fernández, S. Agrestini, C. P. Romao, J. van den Brink, N. A. Spaldin, K.-J. Zhou, and U. Staub, Nature 618, 946 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    C. T. Chantler, G. Bunker, P. D’Angelo, and S. Diaz-Moreno, Nature Reviews Methods Primers 4, 89 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    C. A. F. Vaz, G. van der Laan, S. A. Cavill, H. A. Dürr, A. Fraile Rodríguez, F. Kronast, W. Kuch, P. Sainctavit, G. Schütz, H. Wende, E. Weschke, and F. Wilhelm, Nature Reviews Methods Primers 5, 27 (2025)

    work page 2025

  9. [9]

    Stöhr and H

    J. Stöhr and H. C. Siegmann, Magnetism (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006). 53

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Kirilyuk, A

    A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and T. Rasing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2731 (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Beaurepaire, J.-C

    E. Beaurepaire, J.-C. Merle, A. Daunois, and J.-Y. Bigot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4250 (1996)

    work page 1996

  12. [12]

    Schoenlein, T

    R. Schoenlein, T. Elsaesser, K. Holldack, Z. Huang, H. Kapteyn, M. Murnane, and M. Wo- erner, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engi- neering Sciences 377, 20180384 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    P. Emma, R. Akre, J. Arthur, R. Bionta, C. Bostedt, J. Bozek, A. Brachmann, P. Bucks- baum, R. Coffee, F.-J. Decker, Y. Ding, D. Dowell, S. Edstrom, A. Fisher, J. Frisch, S. Gile- vich, J. Hastings, G. Hays, P. Hering, Z. Huang, R. Iverson, H. Loos, M. Messerschmidt, A. Miahnahri, S. Moeller, H.-D. Nuhn, G. Pile, D. Ratner, J. Rzepiela, D. Schultz, T. Smi...

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Ishikawa, H

    T. Ishikawa, H. Aoyagi, T. Asaka, Y. Asano, N. Azumi, T. Bizen, H. Ego, K. Fukami, T. Fukui, Y. Furukawa, S. Goto, H. Hanaki, T. Hara, T. Hasegawa, T. Hatsui, A. Hi- gashiya, T. Hirono, N. Hosoda, M. Ishii, T. Inagaki, Y. Inubushi, T. Itoga, Y. Joti, M. Kago, T. Kameshima, H. Kimura, Y. Kirihara, A. Kiyomichi, T. Kobayashi, C. Kondo, T. Kudo, H. Maesaka, ...

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Uemura, A

    Y. Uemura, A. S. M. Ismail, S. H. Park, S. Kwon, M. Kim, H. Elnaggar, F. Frati, H. Wadati, Y. Hirata, Y. Zhang, K. Yamagami, S. Yamamoto, I. Matsuda, U. Halisdemir, G. Koster, C. Milne, M. Ammann, B. M. Weckhuysen, and F. M. F. de Groot, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13, 4207–4214 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Y. Shen, D. Kan, I.-C. Lin, M.-W. Chu, I. Suzuki, and Y. Shimakawa, Applied Physics Letters 117, 042408 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Tokura, S

    Y. Tokura, S. Seki, and N. Nagaosa, Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 076501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    Sato, Light and magnetism (Asakura, 2001)

    K. Sato, Light and magnetism (Asakura, 2001). 54

    work page 2001

  19. [19]

    Kubota, Magnetism of buried layers studied by soft X-ray resonant magneto-optical effect using polarization modulation , Ph.D

    Y. Kubota, Magnetism of buried layers studied by soft X-ray resonant magneto-optical effect using polarization modulation , Ph.D. thesis, University of Tokyo (2016)

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    Attwood, Soft X-Rays and Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation: Principles and Applications (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    D. Attwood, Soft X-Rays and Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation: Principles and Applications (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  21. [21]

    C. T. Chen, Y. U. Idzerda, H.-J. Lin, N. V. Smith, G. Meigs, E. Chaban, G. H. Ho, E. Pel- legrin, and F. Sette, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 152 (1995)

    work page 1995

  22. [22]

    van der Laan and A

    G. van der Laan and A. I. Figueroa, Coordination Chemistry Reviews 277-278, 95 (2014) , following Chemical Structures using Synchrotron Radiation

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    J. Fink, E. Schierle, E. Weschke, and J. Geck, Reports on Progress in Physics 76, 056502 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Yamamoto, Y

    S. Yamamoto, Y. Senba, T. Tanaka, H. Ohashi, T. Hirono, H. Kimura, M. Fujisawa, J. Miyawaki, A. Harasawa, T. Seike, S. Takahashi, N. Nariyama, T. Matsushita, M. Takeuchi, T. Ohata, Y. Furukawa, K. Takeshita, S. Goto, Y. Harada, S. Shin, H. Kitamura, A. Kak- izaki, M. Oshima, and I. Matsuda, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 21, 352 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Takubo, K

    K. Takubo, K. Yamamoto, Y. Hirata, Y. Yokoyama, Y. Kubota, S. Yamamoto, S. Yamamoto, I. Matsuda, S. Shin, T. Seki, K. Takanashi, and H. Wadati, Applied Physics Letters 110, 162401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Ogawa, S

    M. Ogawa, S. Yamamoto, Y. Kousa, F. Nakamura, R. Yukawa, A. Fukushima, A. Harasawa, H. Kondoh, Y. Tanaka, A. Kakizaki, and I. Matsuda, Review of Scientific Instruments 83, 023109 (2012)

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Stamm, T

    C. Stamm, T. Kachel, N. Pontius, R. Mitzner, T. Quast, K. Holldack, S. Khan, C. Lupulescu, E. F. Aziz, M. Wietstruk, H. A. Dürr, and W. Eberhardt, Nature Materials 6, 740 (2007)

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    D. J. Higley, K. Hirsch, G. L. Dakovski, E. Jal, E. Yuan, T. Liu, A. A. Lutman, J. P. MacArthur, E. Arenholz, Z. Chen, G. Coslovich, P. Denes, P. W. Granitzka, P. Hart, M. C. Hoffmann, J. Joseph, L. Le Guyader, A. Mitra, S. Moeller, H. Ohldag, M. Seaberg, P. Shafer, J. Stöhr, A. Tsukamoto, H.-D. Nuhn, A. H. Reid, H. A. Dürr, and W. F. Schlotter, Review of...

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Yamamoto and I

    S. Yamamoto and I. Matsuda, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 82, 021003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  30. [30]

    R. W. Schoenlein, S. Chattopadhyay, H. H. W. Chong, T. E. Glover, P. A. Heimann, C. V. Shank, A. A. Zholents, and M. S. Zolotorev, Science 287, 2237–2240 (2000) . 55

    work page 2000

  31. [31]

    S. Khan, K. Holldack, T. Kachel, R. Mitzner, and T. Quast, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 074801 (2006)

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    Holldack, J

    K. Holldack, J. Bahrdt, A. Balzer, U. Bovensiepen, M. Brzhezinskaya, A. Erko, A. Eschen- lohr, R. Follath, A. Firsov, W. Frentrup, L. Le Guyader, T. Kachel, P. Kuske, R. Mitzner, R. Müller, N. Pontius, T. Quast, I. Radu, J.-S. Schmidt, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, M. Sper- ling, C. Stamm, C. Trabant, and A. Föhlisch, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 21, 1090 (2014)

    work page 2014

  33. [33]

    Beaud, S

    P. Beaud, S. L. Johnson, A. Streun, R. Abela, D. Abramsohn, D. Grolimund, F. Krasniqi, T. Schmidt, V. Schlott, and G. Ingold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 174801 (2007)

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    Labat, J.-B

    M. Labat, J.-B. Brubach, A. Ciavardini, M.-E. Couprie, E. Elkaim, P. Fertey, T. Ferte, P. Hollander, N. Hubert, E. Jal, C. Laulhé, J. Luning, O. Marcouillé, T. Moreno, P. Morin, F. Polack, P. Prigent, S. Ravy, J.-P. Ricaud, P. Roy, M. Silly, F. Sirotti, A. Taleb, M.-A. Tordeux, and A. Nadji, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 25, 385 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    X. F. Li, A. L’Huillier, M. Ferray, L. A. Lompré, and G. Mainfray, Phys. Rev. A 39, 5751 (1989)

    work page 1989

  36. [36]

    P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Augé, P. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini, Science 292, 1689–1692 (2001)

    work page 2001

  37. [37]

    Hentschel, R

    M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, C. Spielmann, G. A. Reider, N. Milosevic, T. Brabec, P. Corkum, U. Heinzmann, M. Drescher, and F. Krausz, Nature 414, 509 (2001)

    work page 2001

  38. [38]

    Jarecki, M

    J. Jarecki, M. Hennecke, T. Sidiropoulos, M. Schnuerer, S. Eisebitt, and D. Schick, Structural Dynamics 11, 054303 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Chakraborty, S

    S. Chakraborty, S. Britto, M. Gomez-Gonzalez, A. G. Buzanich, and I. Mikulska, Cell Reports Physical Science 6 (2025), 10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102806

    work page doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2025.102806 2025

  40. [40]

    X. Chen, R. Adam, D. E. Bürgler, F. Wang, Z. Lu, L. Pan, S. Heidtfeld, C. Greb, M. Liu, Q. Liu, J. Wang, C. M. Schneider, and D. Cao, Physics Reports 1102, 1 (2025) , ultrafast demagnetization in ferromagnetic materials: Origins and progress

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Hohlfeld, S.-S

    J. Hohlfeld, S.-S. Wellershoff, J. Güdde, U. Conrad, V. Jähnke, and E. Matthias, Chemical Physics 251, 237 (2000)

    work page 2000

  42. [42]

    Lambert, S

    C.-H. Lambert, S. Mangin, B. S. D. C. S. Varaprasad, Y. K. Takahashi, M. Hehn, M. Cinchetti, G. Malinowski, K. Hono, Y. Fainman, M. Aeschlimann, and E. E. Fuller- ton, Science 345, 1337–1340 (2014) . 56

    work page 2014

  43. [43]

    Suzuki, Y

    M. Suzuki, Y. Inubushi, M. Yabashi, and T. Ishikawa, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 21, 466 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Kubota, M

    Y. Kubota, M. Suzuki, T. Katayama, K. Yamamoto, K. Tono, Y. Inubushi, T. Seki, K. Takanashi, H. Wadati, and M. Yabashi, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 26, 1139 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Yamamoto, Y

    K. Yamamoto, Y. Kubota, M. Suzuki, Y. Hirata, K. Carva, M. Berritta, K. Takubo, Y. Uemura, R. Fukaya, K. Tanaka, W. Nishimura, T. Ohkochi, T. Katayama, T. Togashi, K. Tamasaku, M. Yabashi, Y. Tanaka, T. Seki, K. Takanashi, P. M. Oppeneer, and H. Wa- dati, New Journal of Physics 21, 123010 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Ikeda, T

    K. Ikeda, T. Seki, G. Shibata, T. Kadono, K. Ishigami, Y. Takahashi, M. Horio, S. Sakamoto, Y. Nonaka, M. Sakamaki, K. Amemiya, N. Kawamura, M. Suzuki, K. Takanashi, and A. Fujimori, Applied Physics Letters 111, 142402 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    S. Ueda, M. Mizuguchi, Y. Miura, J. G. Kang, M. Shirai, and K. Takanashi, Applied Physics Letters 109, 042404 (2016)

    work page 2016

  48. [48]

    Battiato, K

    M. Battiato, K. Carva, and P. M. Oppeneer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 027203 (2010)

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    Hofherr, S

    M. Hofherr, S. Moretti, J. Shim, S. Häuser, N. Y. Safonova, M. Stiehl, A. Ali, S. Sakshath, J. W. Kim, D. H. Kim, H. J. Kim, J. I. Hong, H. C. Kapteyn, M. M. Murnane, M. Cinchetti, D. Steil, S. Mathias, B. Stadtmüller, M. Albrecht, D. E. Kim, U. Nowak, and M. Aeschli- mann, Phys. Rev. B 98, 174419 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Yamamoto, M

    S. Yamamoto, M. Taguchi, M. Fujisawa, R. Hobara, S. Yamamoto, K. Yaji, T. Nakamura, K. Fujikawa, R. Yukawa, T. Togashi, M. Yabashi, M. Tsunoda, S. Shin, and I. Matsuda, Phys. Rev. B 89, 064423 (2014)

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    Yamamoto, S

    K. Yamamoto, S. E. Moussaoui, Y. Hirata, S. Yamamoto, Y. Kubota, S. Owada, M. Yabashi, T. Seki, K. Takanashi, I. Matsuda, and H. Wadati, Applied Physics Letters 116, 172406 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    C. D. Stanciu, F. Hansteen, A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, and T. Rasing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 047601 (2007)

    work page 2007

  53. [53]

    I. Radu, K. Vahaplar, C. Stamm, T. Kachel, N. Pontius, H. A. Dürr, T. A. Ostler, J. Barker, R. F. L. Evans, R. W. Chantrell, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, A. Kirilyuk, T. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel, Nature 472, 205 (2011) . 57

    work page 2011

  54. [54]

    I. Radu, C. Stamm, N. Pontius, T. Kachel, P. Ramm, J.-U. Thiele, H. A. Dürr, and C. H. Back, Phys. Rev. B 81, 104415 (2010)

    work page 2010

  55. [55]

    Zhang, T

    Y. Zhang, T. Katayama, A. Chikamatsu, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, N. Pontius, Y. Hirata, K. Takubo, K. Yamagami, K. Ikeda, K. Yamamoto, T. Hasegawa, and H. Wadati, Commu- nications Physics 5, 50 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Katayama, A

    T. Katayama, A. Chikamatsu, Y. Zhang, S. Yasui, H. Wadati, and T. Hasegawa, Chemistry of Materials 33, 5675 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Tsuyama, S

    T. Tsuyama, S. Chakraverty, S. Macke, N. Pontius, C. Schüßler-Langeheine, H. Y. Hwang, Y. Tokura, and H. Wadati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 256402 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    Yamamoto, T

    K. Yamamoto, T. Tsuyama, S. Ito, K. Takubo, I. Matsuda, N. Pontius, C. Schüßler- Langeheine, M. Minohara, H. Kumigashira, Y. Yamasaki, H. Nakao, Y. Murakami, T. Katase, T. Kamiya, and H. Wadati, New Journal of Physics 24, 043012 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Okamoto, D

    J. Okamoto, D. J. Huang, K. S. Chao, S. W. Huang, C.-H. Hsu, A. Fujimori, A. Masuno, T. Terashima, M. Takano, and C. T. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 82, 132402 (2010)

    work page 2010

  60. [60]

    Chakraverty, T

    S. Chakraverty, T. Matsuda, H. Wadati, J. Okamoto, Y. Yamasaki, H. Nakao, Y. Murakami, S. Ishiwata, M. Kawasaki, Y. Taguchi, Y. Tokura, and H. Y. Hwang, Phys. Rev. B 88, 220405 (2013)

    work page 2013

  61. [61]

    Yamamoto, Y

    K. Yamamoto, Y. Hirata, M. Horio, Y. Yokoyama, K. Takubo, M. Minohara, H. Kumigashira, Y. Yamasaki, H. Nakao, Y. Murakami, A. Fujimori, and H. Wadati, Phys. Rev. B 97, 075134 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Minohara, M

    M. Minohara, M. Kitamura, H. Wadati, H. Nakao, R. Kumai, Y. Murakami, and H. Kumi- gashira, Journal of Applied Physics 120, 025303 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    A. D. Caviglia, M. Först, R. Scherwitzl, V. Khanna, H. Bromberger, R. Mankowsky, R. Singla, Y.-D. Chuang, W. S. Lee, O. Krupin, W. F. Schlotter, J. J. Turner, G. L. Dakovski, M. P. Minitti, J. Robinson, V. Scagnoli, S. B. Wilkins, S. A. Cavill, M. Gibert, S. Gariglio, P. Zubko, J.-M. Triscone, J. P. Hill, S. S. Dhesi, and A. Cavalleri, Phys. Rev. B 88, 22...

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    Y. Zhu, J. Hoffman, C. E. Rowland, H. Park, D. A. Walko, J. W. Freeland, P. J. Ryan, R. D. Schaller, A. Bhattacharya, and H. Wen, Nature Communications 9, 1799 (2018)

    work page 2018

  65. [65]

    Thielemann-Kühn, D

    N. Thielemann-Kühn, D. Schick, N. Pontius, C. Trabant, R. Mitzner, K. Holldack, H. Zabel, A. Föhlisch, and C. Schüßler-Langeheine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 197202 (2017) . 58

    work page 2017

  66. [66]

    I. Radu, G. Woltersdorf, M. Kiessling, A. Melnikov, U. Bovensiepen, J.-U. Thiele, and C. H. Back, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 117201 (2009)

    work page 2009

  67. [67]

    Wortmann, I

    G. Wortmann, I. Nowik, B. Perscheid, G. Kaindl, and I. Felner, Phys. Rev. B 43, 5261 (1991)

    work page 1991

  68. [68]

    H. Wada, A. Nakamura, A. Mitsuda, M. Shiga, T. Tanaka, H. Mitamura, and T. Goto, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 9, 7913 (1997)

    work page 1997

  69. [69]

    Yamamoto, K

    K. Yamamoto, K. Horiba, M. Taguchi, M. Matsunami, N. Kamakura, A. Chainani, Y. Takata, K. Mimura, M. Shiga, H. Wada, Y. Senba, H. Ohashi, and S. Shin, Phys. Rev. B 72, 161101 (2005)

    work page 2005

  70. [70]

    Yamamoto, K

    K. Yamamoto, K. Horiba, M. Taguchi, M. Matsunami, N. Kamakura, Y. Takata, A. Chainani, K. Mimura, M. Shiga, H. Wada, Y. Senba, H. Ohashi, and S. Shin, Phys- ica B: Condensed Matter 378-380, 681 (2006) , proceedings of the International Conference on Strongly Correlated Electron Systems

    work page 2006

  71. [71]

    Ichiki, K

    K. Ichiki, K. Mimura, H. Anzai, T. Uozumi, H. Sato, Y. Utsumi, S. Ueda, A. Mitsuda, H. Wada, Y. Taguchi, K. Shimada, H. Namatame, and M. Taniguchi, Phys. Rev. B 96, 045106 (2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    Shimokasa, N

    R. Shimokasa, N. Kawamura, T. Matsumoto, K. Kawakami, T. Kawabata, G. Isumi, T. Uozumi, A. Mitsuda, H. Wada, M. Mizumaki, and K. Mimura, Radiation Physics and Chemistry 175, 108150 (2020) , 17th International Conference on X-ray Absorption Fine Structure - XAFS2018

    work page 2020

  73. [73]

    Y. H. Matsuda, T. Inami, K. Ohwada, Y. Murata, H. Nojiri, Y. Murakami, A. Mitsuda, H. Wada, H. Miyazaki, and I. Harada, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 77, 054713 (2008)

    work page 2008

  74. [74]

    Y. H. Matsuda, Z. W. Ouyang, H. Nojiri, T. Inami, K. Ohwada, M. Suzuki, N. Kawamura, A. Mitsuda, and H. Wada, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 046402 (2009)

    work page 2009

  75. [75]

    Nakamura, T

    T. Nakamura, T. Hirono, T. Kinoshita, Y. Narumi, M. Hayashi, H. Nojiri, A. Mitsuda, H. Wada, K. Kodama, K. Kindo, and A. Kotani, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 81, 103705 (2012)

    work page 2012

  76. [76]

    H. Wada, M. F. Hundley, R. Movshovich, and J. D. Thompson, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1141 (1999). 59

    work page 1999

  77. [77]

    Yokoyama, K

    Y. Yokoyama, K. Kawakami, Y. Hirata, K. Takubo, K. Yamamoto, K. Abe, A. Mitsuda, H. Wada, T. Uozumi, S. Yamamoto, I. Matsuda, S. Kimura, K. Mimura, and H. Wadati, Phys. Rev. B 100, 115123 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    J. R. L. Mardegan, S. Zerdane, G. Mancini, V. Esposito, J. R. Rouxel, R. Mankowsky, C. Svetina, N. Gurung, S. Parchenko, M. Porer, B. Burganov, Y. Deng, P. Beaud, G. Ingold, B. Pedrini, C. Arrell, C. Erny, A. Dax, H. Lemke, M. Decker, N. Ortiz, C. Milne, G. Smo- lentsev, L. Maurel, S. L. Johnson, A. Mitsuda, H. Wada, Y. Yokoyama, H. Wadati, and U. Staub, ...

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    Yamagami, H

    K. Yamagami, H. Ueda, U. Staub, Y. Zhang, K. Yamamoto, S. H. Park, S. Kwon, A. Mitsuda, H. Wada, T. Uozumi, K. Mimura, and H. Wadati, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023099 (2024)

    work page 2024

  80. [80]

    S. H. Park, M. Kim, C.-K. Min, I. Eom, I. Nam, H.-S. Lee, H.-S. Kang, H.-D. Kim, H. Y. Jang, S. Kim, S.-m. Hwang, G.-S. Park, J. Park, T.-Y. Koo, and S. Kwon, Review of Scientific Instruments 89, 055105 (2018)

    work page 2018

Showing first 80 references.