Fragmentation-coagulation processes with advection or diffusion in space

Jacek Banasiak; Nduduzo Majozi

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Fragmentation-coagulation processes with advection or diffusion in space

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new proof shows that advection- or diffusion-driven fragmentation–coagulation models with unbounded coagulation rates admit classical solutions.

desk verdict Worth a referee, but the proof of the main generation theorem has a normalization gap that needs fixing before the semigroup claims stand. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.01453 v2 pith:3JKVJZLF submitted 2026-01-04 math.AP math-phmath.MP

Jacek Banasiak , Nduduzo Majozi This is my paper

classification math.APmath-phmath.MP MSC 45K0534G2047D0347H0747H2035F1035J2582D

keywords fragmentationcoagulationadvectiondiffusionC0-semigroupssemigroupswithparameterMiyadera–Deschperturbationmomentregularisation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a semigroup theory for continuous fragmentation–coagulation equations in which particles are also transported in space by advection or diffusion. Its central claim is that, under a uniform-integrability condition on the fragmentation kernel, the transport–fragmentation operator generates a strongly continuous positive semigroup in weighted L1 spaces over particle mass, for sufficiently large weight exponent. A moment-regularisation estimate then allows the authors to prove classical solvability of the nonlinear transport–fragmentation–coagulation problem, even when the coagulation kernel grows polynomially, as long as it is controlled by the fragmentation loss rate. The key novelty is that the loss term itself, rather than the diffusion coefficient, provides the regularising mechanism that keeps the nonlinearity under control.

What carries the argument

The central construction is a dominating x-independent fragmentation operator: instead of studying B(u)(x,m)=∫_m^∞ b(x,m,s)a(x,s)u(x,s)ds directly, the authors replace the spatially dependent kernel b by a single kernel β(m,s) independent of x (with b(x,m,s)≤β(m,s)) and introduce the reduced operator B_1 in (3.28). What makes the argument work is the equi-integrability condition (3.34): the family of rescaled daughter distributions {z↦s z^{r0}β(zs,s)}_{s≥s0} is uniformly integrable on [0,1]. This forces the normalised moments c_r(s)=s∫_0^1 z^r β(zs,s)dz to decay to 0 uniformly in s as r→∞, turning B_1 into an arbitrarily small Desch perturbation of the loss-semigroup. Example 3.1 (daughter s

What would settle it

Take the kernel β(m,s)=b_2 on [s−1,s] and β(m,s)=2s(1−b_2)+b_2 on [0,1] for s≥2 (Example 3.1). For this kernel compute c_r(s): direct calculation gives c_r(s)=1/(r+1)(b_1(s)/s^r + b_2 s(1−(1−1/s)^{r+1})), and l'Hôpital's rule gives lim_{s→∞}c_r(s)=b_2>0 for every fixed r>1, so the uniform decay (3.31) fails. One could then test numerically whether the operator K^0 in X^0_r still generates a C0-semigroup for r large; if it does, uniform integrability is not necessary, and if it does not, the condition is the exact boundary of the theory.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors establish that the linear transport–fragmentation operator K^i = T_0 + A + B generates a positive C0-semigroup on X^i_r = L1(R_+, X^i_x, (1+m^r)dm) for all r beyond a threshold r_1, for both the Lebesgue space X^1_x = L1(Ω) and the continuous-functions space X^0_x = C0(Ω). The proof proceeds by constructing an x-independent dominating fragmentation problem whose kernel β satisfies equi-integrability of the rescaled family {s z^{r0} β(zs,s)}; this yields uniform decay of the normalised moments c_r(s) to 0, making the gain operator a small Miyadera–Desch perturbation of the loss-absorption operator. The generated semigroup has the moment-regularising property: for T_0 independent o

Load-bearing premise

The theorem rests on the assumption that the normalised daughter-size distributions s z^{r0} β(zs,s) are uniformly integrable in z across all parent sizes s≥s0; if that family is merely pointwise integrable, the uniform decay that makes the perturbation small can fail (as in Example 3.1), and the generation proof collapses. For the unbounded-coagulation result, one further needs the transport operator T_0 to be independent of the particle mass m.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any fragmentation kernel satisfying the equi-integrability condition, the transport–fragmentation equation is well-posed in X^1_r and X^0_r for sufficiently large polynomial weight r, giving existence of a positive C0-semigroup.
The moment-regularisation estimate (4.25) permits unbounded coagulation kernels of growth (1+m^q) with q<γ, provided the loss rate grows like m^γ; the fragmentation loss, not the diffusion, controls the coagulation singularity.
The results cover both advection (Lipschitz divergence-free velocity field) and diffusion (nondegenerate, measurable-in-mass C^1 diffusion coefficient), on bounded domains or R^N.
For bounded coagulation kernels, classical solvability holds without the mass-independence restriction on the transport operator; for unbounded kernels with transport independent of mass, local classical solutions exist and the maximal existence time is characterised by norm blow-up.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The equi-integrability condition (3.34) is close to optimal: Example 3.1 suggests that fragmentation kernels placing significant daughter mass near the parent (erosion-like) are the hard case; a natural testable extension is whether weakening (3.34) to a logarithmic moment condition still yields generation in X^0_r.
The method may transfer to other parameter-dependent semigroups where the spatial operator varies with the parameter (not just mass), such as energy-dependent transport in kinetic theory, whenever a dominating parameter-independent perturbation can be constructed.
Since the regularisation is driven by the absorption/decay term rather than diffusion, one might predict that for vanishing loss rate (γ→0) the classical-solvability result breaks; this could be checked numerically for the pure advection–fragmentation–coagulation equation.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

What you should know: this paper is worth taking seriously, but the proof of the main generation theorem (Theorem 3.3) has a normalization error that is not just cosmetic. Inequality (3.49) states β0 w_r(s)+c_r(s) < 1/(2M); since w_r(s)=1+s^r is unbounded, that cannot hold for any r>0. The preceding estimate (3.39) suggests they meant β0 w_l(s)/w_r(s)+c_r(s). Even with that correction, the uniform bound fails when s0 ≤ 1 because the ratio w_l/w_r equals 1 at s=1, and the theorem allows s0 ≥ 0. The proof of (3.44), which underpins both Theorems 3.3 and 4.5, is therefore incomplete for parameters explicitly permitted by the statement. I think the argument can likely be repaired by splitting the mass interval at a large S, using the smallness of 1/λ on the bounded part and the uniform decay of c_r(s) on the tail, but as written this is a real gap. What is genuinely new: the construction of an x-independent dominating fragmentation operator and the equi-integrability condition (3.34) that forces the normalized moments to decay uniformly in s. That is a real idea, and it lets them get C0-space generation and moment regularization when T0 is independent of m. The semigroup-with-parameter gluing propositions (2.1–2.3) are clean and useful. I also give credit for being explicit about limitations: the equi-integrability assumption, the T0-independence needed for the unbounded-coagulation result, and the open question of global existence. The soft spots are real but not all equally damaging. The L1 theorems (3.1, 3.2) are stated with proofs omitted and deferred to the authors' own [16]; acceptable in a research announcement, less so in a full paper. Typos are minor: the gain term in (3.28) integrates u(t,x,m) instead of u(t,x,s), and 'T_˚u<0' in Theorem 4.5 should be 'T_˚u<∞'. The load-bearing issue is the one above. The equi-integrability condition is restrictive, and Example 3.1 shows that natural kernels violate it; the paper should state its scope more prominently. Bottom line: the central idea is sound and the paper deserves a serious referee, but Theorem 3.3 needs a corrected proof. I would send it out and require a careful revision.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a C0-semigroup framework for spatially inhomogeneous fragmentation–coagulation equations with advection or diffusion. It proves a parameter-dependent 'gluing' result for semigroups, then studies transport–absorption and transport–fragmentation in X^1_r = L^1(R_+, L^1(Ω), dm_r) and X^0_r = L^1(R_+, C_0(Ω), dm_r). The main new ingredient is a dominating x-independent fragmentation equation whose normalized kernel is assumed to satisfy a uniform integrability condition; this is used to prove generation of a positive C0-semigroup and a moment-regularising estimate. These linear results are applied to advection and diffusion transport terms, and a fixed-point argument is used to obtain local classical solvability of the full transport–fragmentation–coagulation problem with unbounded coagulation kernels under the stated restrictions.

Significance. If the gaps identified below are repaired, the paper would be a substantial contribution: it extends the moment-regularisation approach to spatially inhomogeneous fragmentation–coagulation equations with unbounded coagulation, and it gives a unified treatment of advection and diffusion transports. The dominating-kernel construction and the use of analytic fragmentation semigroups for regularization are valuable ideas, and the paper is largely self-consistent in its overall architecture. However, two load-bearing technical points are currently not established: the smallness inequality in the proof of Theorem 3.3 is not valid as written, and the positivity claim for the modified coagulation operator in Proposition 4.2 is false as stated. These issues affect the central generation theorem and the nonlinear existence theorem, so the manuscript cannot be accepted in its present form.

major comments (2)

[§3.4.2, Theorem 3.3, Eq. (3.49)] The inequality β0 w_r(s)+c_r(s) < 1/(2M) cannot hold for all s≥s0 because w_r(s)=1+s^r is unbounded on [s0,∞), regardless of the uniform decay of c_r(s). The preceding estimate (3.39) suggests that the intended expression is β0 w_l(s)/w_r(s)+c_r(s), but even with that correction the proof must justify that s0 may be taken large enough and that the supremum is indeed below 1/(2M) for some r. As written, the proof of (3.44) — the Miyadera–Desch smallness condition — is incomplete. Since this is the core of Theorem 3.3, the later generation results and Theorem 4.5 inherit the gap.
[§4.4.1, Proposition 4.2, Eq. (4.32)] The positivity assertion (C_q f)(x,m) ≥ 1/2∫_0^m k f f ds ≥ 0 for f∈U_b is not justified and is generally false. From (4.29), (C_q f)(x,m) = -A_q f + C(f,f), so the loss terms are -a_q(1+m^q)f - f∫_0^∞ k f ds. The estimates preceding (4.32) give ∫_0^∞ k f ds ≤ 2k_0 b(1+m^q), hence the loss is at least 4k_0 b(1+m^q) f(x,m) in absolute value; the quadratic gain cannot control this linear term pointwise for functions with large local mass and small support. The fixed-point argument in Theorem 4.5 is set in U_b⊂X_{r,+}, so the claimed positivity of the mild solution is not established. This is load-bearing for Theorem 4.5 and its corollaries.

minor comments (4)

[§3.3, Theorems 3.1 and 3.2] These results are stated with proofs omitted and deferred to [16]. Relying on a prior paper is acceptable, but the text should make explicit that these are quoted results rather than new theorems, especially since [16] is self-cited and the spatial transport is new here.
[§3.3, Theorem 3.2] The statement reads 'for any n, r and q satisfying max{1,l}< n < p < r'; the variable p appears without being quantified. It should presumably be 'for any n, p, r' or an equivalent correction.
[§4.4.1, Corollary 4.2] In the q=0 case the text says 'A_q u = k_0 b u', but A_q was defined with a_q=2k_0 b in Proposition 4.2. With q=0 this gives A_q u = 2k_0 b u, not k_0 b u.
[Throughout] There are many minor typos and redundancies, e.g., 'Lebesque' (p.5), 'anlaytic' (§3.4.3), 'polimerisation' (p.1), 'chose' (Theorem 3.3), and 'if T_{˚u}<0' in Theorem 4.5 should certainly be 'if T_{˚u}<∞'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the core generation theorem is self-contained, and the [16]-based steps invoke independent prior work without spatial transport.

full rationale

The paper's central new result, Theorem 3.3, is a genuine sufficiency argument: it assumes the uniform integrability condition (3.34) on the normalized dominating-kernel family, proves via Proposition 3.3 that this forces the normalized moments c_r(s) to decay to zero uniformly in s, and then verifies the Miyadera--Desch condition (3.44). The dominating x-independent problem (3.28) is introduced as a new device, not as a renamed version of the conclusion, and the proof does not fit parameters to data or define the conclusion into the hypotheses. The later semilinear result, Theorem 4.5, is obtained by combining the moment-regularising estimate (4.25) with the fixed-point argument of [16, Theorems 3.1 & 3.2]. Although [16] is a prior paper by the first author, it is a parameter-free derivation for the spatially homogeneous growth-fragmentation-coagulation equation whose assumptions do not include advection or diffusion; under the reviewing rules, such a cited result counts as independent support rather than a circular self-citation. The text does delegate some proofs to [16] (e.g., Section 3.3 says proofs are 'almost identical' to [16] and 'thus will be omitted'), but that is an omitted-proof presentation choice, not an equation-level reduction of the present claim to its own input. A possible normalization typo in (3.49) — with w_r(s)=1+s^r the displayed inequality cannot hold for large s, while the preceding (3.39) suggests the intended factor is β0 w_l(s)/w_r(s) + c_r(s) — is a correctness/consistency concern, not a circularity, so it does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard semigroup theory plus explicit structural assumptions on the fragmentation rate, moment growth, and a newly introduced dominating kernel. No data are fitted and no free numerical parameters are tuned. The most fragile item is assumption (3.34), the uniform integrability of the normalized dominating fragmentation kernel; without it the X0 generation theorem (Theorem 3.3) and the nonlinear result do not go through.

assumptions (8)

ad hoc to paper Dominating fragmentation kernel β with b(x,m,s) ≤ β(m,s) and equi-integrability of the normalized family (3.34)
Introduced in Section 3.4 as the novel tool for X0 spaces. Example 3.1 shows natural kernels can violate the uniform decay required by (3.34), so it restricts the scope.
domain assumption Uniform rate comparability (3.2c): α1(m) ≤ a(x,m) ≤ α2(m) ≤ M α1(m) with M < ∞
Used throughout to let a single mass-dependent rate control loss, fragmentation gain, and coagulation; central to (3.48)-(3.49) and Theorem 3.3.
domain assumption Polynomial growth of the loss rate (3.3): α1(m) ≥ a0 m^γ for m ≥ m0
Needed for all moment-regularisation estimates (3.17), (3.27), (4.24), (4.25) and for the unbounded-coagulation nonlinear result with q < γ.
domain assumption Moment bounds on the fragmentation kernel (3.21) and (3.24): n0 ≤ b0(1+s^l) and n_r ≤ c_r s^r with c_r < 1
The L1 generation Theorem 3.1 and estimate (3.25) are proved by repeating [16], which requires these bounds.
domain assumption Substochastic generation assumption (A1) for the transport operator T0
Assumed in Proposition 3.1 and all later sections; verified for advection in Section 4.1 and for diffusion in Section 4.2.
domain assumption For the full nonlinear result, T0 is independent of mass m; otherwise the gain term B is absent or the coagulation kernel is bounded
Explicitly stated as restrictive in Section 4.4; needed for the moment-regularisation estimate (4.25) used in the fixed-point argument.
domain assumption Coagulation kernel growth bound (4.26): 0 ≤ k(x,m,s) ≤ k0(1+m^q)(1+s^q) with q < γ
Controls the unbounded quadratic coagulation term in Theorem 4.5 and the corollaries.
standard math Standard semigroup theory: Hille-Yosida theorem, Miyadera-Desch perturbation, Arendt-Rhandi analyticity, Bochner measurability, tensor-product identifications, interpolation estimates for analytic semigroups
Invoked as unproved background from [11, 36, 48, 56] and others; not specific to this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fragmentation-coagulation processes with advection or diffusion in space." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3JKVJZLF

@misc{pith2026260101453,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fragmentation-coagulation processes with advection or diffusion in space},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3JKVJZLF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.01453}
}

abstract

In this paper, we consider a continuous fragmentation--coagulation model in which the reacting particles can be transported in physical space through either advection or diffusion. We prove new results on the generation of $C_0$-semigroups with parameter and use them to show that the Abstract Cauchy Problem associated with a more general version of the advection/diffusion--fragmentation problem generates a positive $C_0$-semigroup in spaces $L_1(\mathbb R_+, X_x, (1+m^r)dm),$ where $m$ is the particle mass, $X_x$ is either the space of integrable or continuous functions with respect to the spatial variable, and the weight exponent $r$ is sufficiently large. These results enable us to prove the classical solvability of a wide range of advection/diffusion--fragmentation--coagulation equations with unbounded coagulation kernels.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Local and global solutions to continuous fragmentation-coagulation equations with vanishing diffusion and unbounded fragmentation and coagulation rates
math.AP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Local well-posedness and global existence of classical solutions are established for fragmentation-coagulation PDEs with vanishing diffusion under fragmentation domination.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[16]

Banasiak and W

J. Banasiak and W. Lamb. Growth-fragmentation-coagulation equations with unbounded coagulation kernels.Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 378(2185):20190612, 22, 2020

2020
[1]

H. Amann. Dual semigroups and second order linear elliptic boundary value problems. Israel J. Math., 45(2-3):225–254, 1983

1983
[2]

H. Amann. Coagulation-fragmentation processes.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 151(4):339– 366, 2000

2000
[3]

Amann and Ch

H. Amann and Ch. Walker. Local and global strong solutions to continuous coagulation- fragmentation equations with diffusion.J. Differential Equations, 218(1):159–186, 2005

2005
[4]

Arendt, Ch

W. Arendt, Ch. J. K. Batty, W. Hieber, and F. Neubrander.Vector-valued Laplace transforms and Cauchy problems, volume 96 ofMonographs in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser/Springer Basel AG, Basel, second edition, 2011

2011
[5]

Arendt and A

W. Arendt and A. Rhandi. Perturbation of positive semigroups.Arch. Math. (Basel), 56(2):107–119, 1991

1991
[6]

Arlotti, J

L. Arlotti, J. Banasiak, and B. Lods. On general transport equations with abstract bound- ary conditions. The case of divergence free force field.Mediterr. J. Math., 8(1):1–35, 2011

2011
[7]

Banasiak

J. Banasiak. Kinetic-type models with diffusion: conservative and nonconservative solu- tions.Transport Theory Statist. Phys., 36(1-3):43–65, 2007

2007

Show all 60 references

[8]

Banasiak

J. Banasiak. Global classical solutions of coagulation-fragmentation equations with un- bounded coagulation rates.Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 13(1):91–105, 2012

2012
[9]

Banasiak

J. Banasiak. Transport processes with coagulation and strong fragmentation.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 17(2):445–472, 2012

2012
[10]

Banasiak

J. Banasiak. Global solutions of continuous coagulation-fragmentation equations with unbounded coefficients.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 13(12):3319–3334, 2020

2020
[11]

Banasiak and L

J. Banasiak and L. Arlotti.Perturbations of positive semigroups with applications. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag London, Ltd., London, 2006

2006
[12]

Banasiak, L

J. Banasiak, L. O. Joel, and S. Shindin. The discrete unbounded coagulation-fragmentation equation with growth, decay and sedimentation.Kinet. Relat. Models, 12(5):1069–1092, 2019. 36

2019
[13]

Banasiak, L

J. Banasiak, L. O. Joel, and S. Shindin. Long term dynamics of the discrete growth-decay- fragmentation equation.J. Evol. Equ., 19:771–802, 2019

2019
[14]

Banasiak and W

J. Banasiak and W. Lamb. Coagulation, fragmentation and growth processes in a size structured population.Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 11(3):563–585, 2009

2009
[15]

Banasiak and W

J. Banasiak and W. Lamb. Analytic fragmentation semigroups and continuous coagulation- fragmentation equations with unbounded rates.J. Math. Anal. Appl., 391(1):312–322, 2012

2012
[17]

Banasiak, W

J. Banasiak, W. Lamb, and Ph. Lauren¸ cot.Analytic methods for coagulation-fragmentation models. Vol. I. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2020

2020
[18]

Banasiak, W

J. Banasiak, W. Lamb, and Ph. Lauren¸ cot.Analytic methods for coagulation-fragmentation models. Vol. II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2020

2020
[19]

Banasiak, K

J. Banasiak, K. Pich´ or, and R. Rudnicki. Asynchronous exponential growth of a general structured population model.Acta Appl. Math., 119:149–166, 2012

2012
[20]

Banasiak, D

J. Banasiak, D. Wetsi Poka, and S. Shindin. Explicit solutions to some fragmentation equations with growth or decay.J. Phys. A, 55(19):Paper No. 194001, 33, 2022

2022
[21]

Bellomo and M

N. Bellomo and M. Lachowicz. Kinetic equations for dense gases. A review of physical and mathematical results.International Journal of Modern Physics B, 1:1193–1205, 1987

1987
[22]

B´ enilan and D

Ph. B´ enilan and D. Wrzosek. On an infinite system of reaction-diffusion equations.Adv. Math. Sci. Appl., 7(1):351–366, 1997

1997
[23]

Bernard and P

´E. Bernard and P. Gabriel. Asynchronous exponential growth of the growth-fragmentation equation with unbounded fragmentation rate.J. Evol. Equ., pages 1–27, 2019

2019
[24]

Brezis.Functional analysis, Sobolev spaces and partial differential equations

H. Brezis.Functional analysis, Sobolev spaces and partial differential equations. Universi- text. Springer, New York, 2011

2011
[25]

A. V. Burobin. Existence and uniqueness of the solution of the Cauchy problem for a spatially nonhomogeneous coagulation equation.Differentsial ′nye Uravneniya, 19(9):1568– 1579, 1983

1983
[26]

A. V. Burobin. The Cauchy problem for a spatially inhomogeneous equation of coagulation taking diffusion into account.Differentsial ′nye Uravneniya, 21(10):1806–1808, 1838, 1985

1985
[27]

M. Cai, B. F. Edwards, and H. Han. Exact and asymptotic scaling solutions for fragmen- tation with mass loss.Phys. Rev. A (3), 43(2):656–662, 1991

1991
[28]

Chae and P

D. Chae and P. Dubovski ˇ ı. Existence and uniqueness for spatially inhomogeneous coagulation-condensation equation with unbounded kernels.J. Integral Equations Appl., 9(3):219–236, 1997. 37

1997
[29]

Cristian, B

I. Cristian, B. Niethammer, and J. J. L. Vel´ azquez. On an inhomogeneous coagulation model with a differential sedimentation kernel.Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire (First Online), doi 10.4171/AIHPC/166, 2025

2025 doi
[30]

Cristian and J

I. Cristian and J. J. L. Vel´ azquez. Mass concentration in a spatially inhomogeneous coag- ulation model with fast sedimentation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.04270, 2025

2025
[31]

Desvillettes and K

L. Desvillettes and K. Fellner. Large time asymptotics for a continuous coagulation- fragmentation model with degenerate size-dependent diffusion.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 41(6):2315–2334, 2009/10

2009
[32]

Desvillettes and K

L. Desvillettes and K. Fellner. Duality- and entropy methods in coagulation-fragmentation models.Riv. Math. Univ. Parma (N.S.), 4(2):215–263, 2013

2013
[33]

Doumic Jauffret and P

M. Doumic Jauffret and P. Gabriel. Eigenelements of a general aggregation-fragmentation model.Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 20(5):757–783, 2010

2010
[34]

P. B. Dubovski ˘ ı. Solutions of a spatially inhomogeneous equation of coagulation taking into account particle breakdown.Differentsial ′nye Uravneniya, 26(3):508–513, 551, 1990

1990
[35]

P. B. Dubovski ˘ ı. Solvability of the transport equation in coagulation and fragmentation kinetics.Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat., 65(1):3–24, 2001

2001
[36]

Engel and R

K.-J. Engel and R. Nagel.One-parameter semigroups for linear evolution equations, volume 194 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000

2000
[37]

D. Enskog. Kinetische theorie.Kungl. Svenska Vetenskaps Akademiens Handl, 63, 1923

1923
[38]

H. O. Fattorini.The Cauchy problem, volume 13517. Cambridge University Press, 1984

1984
[39]

F. J. Fern´ andez and F. A. F. Tojo. When is the composition of functions measurable? Quaest. Math., 46(9):1837–1846, 2023

2023
[40]

Henry.Geometric theory of semilinear parabolic equations, volume 840

D. Henry.Geometric theory of semilinear parabolic equations, volume 840. Springer, 2006

2006
[41]

Hille and R

E. Hille and R. S. Phillips.Functional analysis and semi-groups, volume Vol. XXXI. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, revised edition, 1974

1974
[42]

L. Kerr, W. Lamb, and M. Langer. Continuous fragmentation equations in weightedl 1 spaces.arXiv preprint arXiv: 2509.09026, 2025

2025 arXiv
[43]

Kerr and M

L. Kerr and M. Langer. Discrete coagulation–fragmentation systems in weightedℓ 1 spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2504.21665, 2025

2025 arXiv
[44]

Lauren¸ cot and S

Ph. Lauren¸ cot and S. Mischler. The continuous coagulation-fragmentation equations with diffusion.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 162(1):45–99, 2002

2002
[45]

Lauren¸ cot and S

Ph. Lauren¸ cot and S. Mischler. Global existence for the discrete diffusive coagulation- fragmentation equations inL 1.Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana, 18(3):731–745, 2002

2002
[46]

Lauren¸ cot and D

Ph. Lauren¸ cot and D. Wrzosek. The Becker–D¨ oring model with diffusion. I. Basic proper- ties of solutions.Colloq. Math., 75(2):245–269, 1998. 38

1998
[47]

Lauren¸ cot and D

Ph. Lauren¸ cot and D. Wrzosek. The Becker–D¨ oring model with diffusion. II. Long time behavior.J. Differential Equations, 148(2):268–291, 1998

1998
[48]

Lunardi.Analytic semigroups and optimal regularity in parabolic problems, volume 16 ofProgress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications

A. Lunardi.Analytic semigroups and optimal regularity in parabolic problems, volume 16 ofProgress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications. Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 1995

1995
[49]

Mischler and M

S. Mischler and M. Rodriguez Ricard. Existence globale pour l’´ equation de Smoluchowski continue non homog` ene et comportement asymptotique des solutions.C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris, 336(5):407–412, 2003

2003
[50]

Mokhtar-Kharroubi and J

M. Mokhtar-Kharroubi and J. Banasiak. On spectral gaps of growth-fragmentation semi- groups in higher moment spaces.Kinet. Relat. Models, 15(2):147–185, 2022

2022
[51]

Okubo and S

A. Okubo and S. A. Levin.Diffusion and ecological problems: modern perspectives. Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 2001

2001
[52]

S. C. Oukouomi Noutchie and E. F. Doungmo Goufo. Global solvability of a continuous model for nonlocal fragmentation dynamics in a moving medium.Math. Probl. Eng., Art. ID 320750, 8, 2013

2013
[53]

Pazy.Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations, volume 44 ofApplied Mathematical Sciences

A. Pazy.Semigroups of linear operators and applications to partial differential equations, volume 44 ofApplied Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983

1983
[54]

Perthame.Transport equations in biology

B. Perthame.Transport equations in biology. Frontiers in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 2007

2007
[55]

Rudnicki and R

R. Rudnicki and R. Wieczorek. Phytoplankton dynamics: from the behavior of cells to a transport equation.Mathematical modelling of natural phenomena, 1(1):81–97, 2006

2006
[56]

R. A. Ryan.Introduction to tensor products of Banach spaces. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag London, Ltd., London, 2002

2002
[57]

V. S. Vladimirov.Generalized functions in mathematical physics. “Mir”, Moscow, 1979

1979
[58]

Ch. Walker. A remark on continuous coagulation-fragmentation equations with unbounded diffusion coefficients. InNonlinear elliptic and parabolic problems, volume 64 ofProgr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., pages 517–528. Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2005

2005
[59]

D. Wrzosek. Existence of solutions for the discrete coagulation-fragmentation model with diffusion.Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal., 9(2):279–296, 1997

1997
[60]

D. Wrzosek. Mass-conserving solutions to the discrete coagulation-fragmentation model with diffusion.Nonlinear Anal., 49(3):297–314, 2002. 39

2002

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [16]

Banasiak and W

J. Banasiak and W. Lamb. Growth-fragmentation-coagulation equations with unbounded coagulation kernels.Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 378(2185):20190612, 22, 2020

2020

[2] [1]

H. Amann. Dual semigroups and second order linear elliptic boundary value problems. Israel J. Math., 45(2-3):225–254, 1983

1983

[3] [2]

H. Amann. Coagulation-fragmentation processes.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 151(4):339– 366, 2000

2000

[4] [3]

Amann and Ch

H. Amann and Ch. Walker. Local and global strong solutions to continuous coagulation- fragmentation equations with diffusion.J. Differential Equations, 218(1):159–186, 2005

2005

[5] [4]

Arendt, Ch

W. Arendt, Ch. J. K. Batty, W. Hieber, and F. Neubrander.Vector-valued Laplace transforms and Cauchy problems, volume 96 ofMonographs in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser/Springer Basel AG, Basel, second edition, 2011

2011

[6] [5]

Arendt and A

W. Arendt and A. Rhandi. Perturbation of positive semigroups.Arch. Math. (Basel), 56(2):107–119, 1991

1991

[7] [6]

Arlotti, J

L. Arlotti, J. Banasiak, and B. Lods. On general transport equations with abstract bound- ary conditions. The case of divergence free force field.Mediterr. J. Math., 8(1):1–35, 2011

2011

[8] [7]

Banasiak

J. Banasiak. Kinetic-type models with diffusion: conservative and nonconservative solu- tions.Transport Theory Statist. Phys., 36(1-3):43–65, 2007

2007