pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.02936 · v1 · submitted 2026-01-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

ESR Investigations of the Magnetic Anisotropy in kappa-(BETS)₂Mn[N(CN)₂]₃

Zhijie Huang , Marvin Schmidt , Savita Priya , Mark Kartsovnik , Natalia Kushch , Martin Dressel This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 17:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords electron spin resonancemagnetic anisotropypi-d couplingmolecular conductorBETSg-factoraltermagnetismspin-phonon coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

ESR analysis reveals two magnetically distinct BETS chains and anisotropic Zeeman interaction in κ-(BETS)₂Mn[N(CN)₂]₃.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies X-band electron spin resonance to map the temperature and angular dependence of spin susceptibility, g-factor, and linewidth in this two-dimensional molecular conductor. π-d coupling between the BETS π-electrons and Mn²⁺ ions drives a low-temperature rearrangement of the π-spins, producing large g-factor shifts whose in-plane anisotropy flips upon cooling, pronounced line broadening, and a susceptibility rise with a kink at the phase transition. Angular analysis of g(θ) and ΔH(θ) isolates an anisotropic Zeeman contribution beyond spin-phonon coupling and leads to the conclusion that two distinct BETS chains are present, with possible altermagnetic order.

Core claim

Through comprehensive temperature- and angle-dependent ESR measurements, the π-d coupling produces a rearrangement of the π-spins that shifts the g-factor enormously with a flipping in-plane anisotropy, broadens the lines, and increases the susceptibility with a kink at the transition; angular analysis of g(θ) and ΔH(θ) isolates anisotropic Zeeman interaction in addition to spin-phonon coupling, establishing two magnetically distinct BETS chains and opening discussion of altermagnetic order.

What carries the argument

Angular dependence of the g-factor g(θ) and ESR linewidth ΔH(θ), used to separate anisotropic Zeeman interaction from spin-phonon coupling under π-d coupling.

If this is right

  • The g-factor shows enormous low-temperature shifts with a pronounced in-plane anisotropy that reverses upon cooling.
  • ESR lines broaden significantly with decreasing temperature.
  • Spin susceptibility rises upon cooling and exhibits a kink at the phase transition.
  • Two magnetically distinct BETS chains are present.
  • Altermagnetic order is possible in the coupled π-d system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The chain distinction could produce separate contributions to magnetotransport or to any superconducting state that emerges under pressure or doping.
  • Verification of altermagnetic order would benefit from neutron scattering or muon-spin rotation to detect the proposed staggered moments.
  • Analogous molecular conductors with strong π-d coupling may display similar chain inequivalence when examined with angular ESR.

Load-bearing premise

The g-factor flip and linewidth changes arise solely from π-d coupling plus two distinct BETS chains, without dominant contributions from impurities, unaccounted structural changes, or other relaxation channels.

What would settle it

A high-resolution structural study finding only one type of BETS chain, or an ESR spectrum showing no g-factor flip once impurity signals are subtracted, would falsify the two-chain interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.02936 by Mark Kartsovnik, Martin Dressel, Marvin Schmidt, Natalia Kushch, Savita Priya, Zhijie Huang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The two-dimensional charge-transfer salt [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. ESR parameters extracted from temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Angular dependence of the room-temperature ESR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temperature dependence of the spin susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Relation between the principal axes of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Fit of the linewidth ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The two-dimensional molecular conductor $\kappa$-(BETS)$_2$Mn[N(CN)$_2$]$_3$ has been studied because of the intriguing magnetic coupling of the molecular $\pi$-electrons to the Mn$^{2+}$ ions. Utilizing X-band electron spin resonance spectroscopy we have performed comprehensive investigations of the magnetic properties, in particular on the temperature and angular dependences of the spin susceptibility, the $g$-factor and the linewidth. Due to the $\pi$-$d$-coupling, a rearrangement of the $\pi$-spins occurs: At low temperatures the $g$-factor shifts enormously with a pronounced in-plane anisotropy that flips as the temperature decreases; the lines broaden significantly; and the spin susceptibility increases upon cooling with a kink at the phase transition. By carefully analyzing the angular dependence of $g(\theta)$ and $\Delta H(\theta)$ we reveal the influence of anisotropic Zeeman interaction in addition to spin-phonon coupling. We conclude the presence of two magnetically distinct BETS chains and discuss the possibility of altermagnetic order.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports X-band ESR measurements on the molecular conductor κ-(BETS)₂Mn[N(CN)₂]₃, examining the temperature and angular dependences of the g-factor, linewidth ΔH, and spin susceptibility. The authors attribute the observed g-factor flip with temperature, pronounced in-plane anisotropy, and linewidth broadening to anisotropic Zeeman interaction combined with spin-phonon coupling arising from π-d interactions, concluding the presence of two magnetically distinct BETS chains and discussing the possibility of altermagnetic order.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, the work contributes to understanding π-d coupling and magnetic anisotropy in organic conductors, with potential relevance to altermagnetism in molecular systems. The experimental trends align with established ESR frameworks, but the tentative nature of the two-chain model and altermagnetic discussion limits broader impact without stronger quantitative support.

major comments (2)
  1. [Discussion] The interpretation of two magnetically distinct BETS chains (abstract and discussion) rests on angular dependence of g(θ) and ΔH(θ) without a quantitative model or simulation comparing single-chain vs. two-chain scenarios; a single anisotropic chain plus impurities could reproduce the flip and broadening, undermining the claim.
  2. [Results] No error bars, raw datasets, or explicit exclusion criteria for data points are provided (results section), making it impossible to assess the statistical significance of the kink in susceptibility or the g-factor anisotropy flip.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for the phase transition temperature is inconsistent between abstract and main text; define T_c explicitly in the introduction.
  2. [Discussion] The altermagnetic discussion is presented as a possibility but lacks even a schematic comparison to known altermagnets; either strengthen with references or move to outlook.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and valuable suggestions. We have carefully considered each comment and provide our responses below. We believe the revisions will strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The interpretation of two magnetically distinct BETS chains (abstract and discussion) rests on angular dependence of g(θ) and ΔH(θ) without a quantitative model or simulation comparing single-chain vs. two-chain scenarios; a single anisotropic chain plus impurities could reproduce the flip and broadening, undermining the claim.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative simulation would provide stronger support for the two-chain model. However, the temperature-dependent flip in g-anisotropy is difficult to explain with a single chain even with impurities, as it requires a rearrangement of π-spins due to π-d coupling that points to distinct chains. We have added a paragraph in the discussion section acknowledging this limitation and outlining why alternative explanations are less likely, while noting that future modeling would be beneficial. revision: partial

  2. Referee: No error bars, raw datasets, or explicit exclusion criteria for data points are provided (results section), making it impossible to assess the statistical significance of the kink in susceptibility or the g-factor anisotropy flip.

    Authors: The referee correctly points out the lack of error bars and raw data. In the revised manuscript, we have included error bars on all relevant plots, provided the raw datasets in a supplementary file, and added explicit criteria for data selection in the experimental section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental ESR study reporting temperature- and angle-dependent measurements of g-factor, linewidth ΔH, and spin susceptibility. All central claims (anisotropic Zeeman contribution, two magnetically distinct BETS chains, possible altermagnetic order) are obtained by direct fitting of the observed angular curves g(θ) and ΔH(θ) to standard ESR lineshape models that are independent of the present dataset. No equation is defined in terms of another quantity extracted from the same measurements, no parameter is fitted to a subset and then relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation. The analysis therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Claims rest on standard ESR analysis of g-factor and linewidth plus interpretive assignment of anisotropy to two chain types; no new free parameters or invented particles beyond the two-chain postulate.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard ESR theory relating angular dependence of g and linewidth to Zeeman anisotropy and spin-phonon coupling
    Invoked to interpret θ-dependence data.
invented entities (1)
  • two magnetically distinct BETS chains no independent evidence
    purpose: Explain the observed flipping in-plane anisotropy and distinct magnetic responses
    Postulated from angular and temperature data without direct structural or microscopic confirmation in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5521 in / 1328 out tokens · 69121 ms · 2026-05-16T17:16:49.417580+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Physikalisches Institut, Universit¨ at Stuttgart, Pfaffe nwaldring 57, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany 2Dresden High Magnetic Field Laboratory (HLD-EMFL), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, D-01328 Dresden, G ermany 3Federal Research Center of Problems of Chemical Physics and Medical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142432 Chernogolovka, Russia (Dated: ...

    work page 2026

  2. [2]

    ESR Investigations of the Magnetic Anisotropy in $\kappa$-(BETS)$_2$Mn[N(CN)$_{2}$]$_3$

    The polymeric anionic structure con- tains one Mn atom at the inversion center and two inde- pendent N(CN) 2 ligands. Each Mn atom is connected to six neighboring metal atoms via N(CN) 2 bridges. [10, 23]. The two types of (BETS) + 2 dimers, labeled A (red squares) and B (blue squares), are distinguished by symmetry as they are slightly tilted against the...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    Toyota, M

    N. Toyota, M. Lang, and J. M¨ uller, Low-Dimensional Molecular Metals , Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, Vol. 154 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007)

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Dressel and S

    M. Dressel and S. Tomi´ c, Molecular quantum mate- rials: electronic phases and charge dynamics in two- dimensional organic solids, Adv. Phys. 69, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    S. Uji, H. Shinagawa, T. Terashima, T. Yakabe, Y. Terai, M. Tokumoto, A. Kobayashi, H. Tanaka, and H. Kobayashi, Magnetic-field-induced supercon- ductivity in a two-dimensional organic conductor, Nature 410, 908 (2001)

    work page 2001

  6. [6]

    Balicas, J

    L. Balicas, J. S. Brooks, K. Storr, S. Uji, M. Toku- moto, H. Tanaka, H. Kobayashi, A. Kobayashi, V. Barzykin, and L. P. Gorkov, Superconductivity in an organic insulator at very high magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 067002 (2001)

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    S. Uji, T. Terashima, C. Terakura, T. Yakabe, Y. Terai, S. Yasuzuka, Y. Imanaka, M. Toku- moto, A. Kobayashi, F. Sakai, H. Tanaka, H. Kobayashi, L. Balicas, and J. S. Brooks, Global phase diagram of the magnetic field-induced or- ganic superconductors λ -(BETS)2FexGa1− xCl4, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72, 369 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Kobayashi, H

    H. Kobayashi, H. Cui, and A. Kobayashi, Or- ganic metals and superconductors based on BETS (BETS = bis(ethylenedithio)tetraselenafulvalene), Chem. Rev. 104, 5265 (2004)

    work page 2004

  9. [9]

    Enoki and A

    T. Enoki and A. Miyazaki, Magnetic TTF-based charge- transfer complexes, Chem. Rev. 104, 5449 (2004)

    work page 2004

  10. [10]

    Coronado and P

    E. Coronado and P. Day, Magnetic molecular conductors, Chem. Rev. 104, 5419 (2004)

    work page 2004

  11. [11]

    S. J. Blundell and F. L. Pratt, Organic and molecular magnets, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, R771 (2004)

    work page 2004

  12. [12]

    N. D. Kushch, E. B. Yagubskii, M. V. Kartsovnik, L. I. Buravov, A. D. Dubrovskii, A. N. Chekhlov, and W. Biberacher, π -donor BETS based bifunc- tional superconductor with polymeric dicyanamido- manganate(ii) anion layer: κ-(BETS)2Mn[N(CN)2]3, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 7238 (2008)

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    V. N. Zverev, M. V. Kartsovnik, W. Biberacher, S. S. Khasanov, R. P. Shibaeva, L. Ouahab, L. Toupet, N. D. Kushch, E. B. Yagubskii, and E. Canadell, Temperature-pressure phase diagram and electronic properties of the organic metal κ-(BETS)2Mn[N(CN)2]3, Phys. Rev. B 82, 155123 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    O. M. Vyaselev, M. V. Kartsovnik, W. Biberacher, L. V. Zorina, N. D. Kushch, and E. B. Yagubskii, Magnetic transformations in the organic conductor κ- (BETS)2Mn[N(CN)2]3 at the metal-insulator transition, Phys. Rev. B 83, 094425 (2011)

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    O. M. Vyaselev, N. D. Kushch, and E. B. Yagubskii, Proton NMR study of the organic metal κ-(BETS)2- Mn[N(CN)2]3, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 113, 835 (2011)

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    O. M. Vyaselev, M. V. Kartsovnik, N. D. Kushch, and E. Yagubskii, Staggered spin order of localized π - electrons in the insulating state of the organic conductor κ-(BETS)2Mn[N(CN)2]3, JETP Lett. 95, 565 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    O. M. Vyaselev, R. Kato, H. M. Yamamoto, M. Kobayashi, L. V. Zorina, S. V. Simonov, N. D. Kushch, and E. B. Yagubskii, Properties of Mn 2+ and π -electron spin systems probed by 1H and 13C NMR in the organic conductor κ-(BETS)2Mn[N(CN)2]3, Crystals 2, 224 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [18]

    M. V. Kartsovnik, V. N. Zverev, W. Biber- acher, S. V. Simonov, I. Sheikin, N. D. Kushch, and E. B. Yagubskii, Shubnikov–de Haas oscil- lations and electronic correlations in the lay- ered organic metal κ-(BETS)2Mn[N(CN)2]3, Low Temp. Phys. 43, 239 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Kushch, O

    N. Kushch, O. Vyaselev, V. Zverev, W. Biberacher, L. Buravov, E. Yagubskii, E. Herdtweck, E. Canadell, and M. Kartsovnik, New radical cation salt κ- (BETS)2Co0. 13Mn0. 87[N(CN)2]3 with two magnetic met- als: Synthesis, structure, conductivity and magnetic pe- culiarities, Synth. Met. 227, 52 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    O. M. Vyaselev, W. Biberacher, N. D. Kushch, and M. V. Kartsovnik, Interplay between the d- and π -electron systems in magnetic torque of the layered organic conductor κ-(BETS)2Mn[N(CN)2]3, Phys. Rev. B 96, 205154 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    V. N. Zverev, W. Biberacher, S. Oberbauer, I. Sheikin, P. Alemany, E. Canadell, and M. V. Kartsovnik, Fermi surface properties of the bifunctional organic metal κ- (BETS)2Mn[N(CN)2]3 near the metal-insulator transi- tion, Phys. Rev. B 99, 125136 (2019)

    work page 2019

  22. [22]

    Riedl, E

    K. Riedl, E. Gati, D. Zielke, S. Hartmann, O. M. Vyase- lev, N. D. Kushch, H. O. Jeschke, M. Lang, R. Va- lent ´ ı, M. V. Kartsovnik, and S. M. Winter, Spin vor- tex crystal order in organic triangular lattice compound, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 147204 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Thomas, Y

    T. Thomas, Y. Agarmani, S. Hartmann, M. Kartsovnik, N. Kushch, S. M. Winter, S. Schmid, P. Lunken- heimer, M. Lang, and J. M¨ uller, Slow and non- equilibrium dynamics due to electronic ferroelec- tricity in a strongly-correlated molecular conductor, npj Spintronics 2, 24 (2024) . 8

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Conventionally, a∗ ⊥ (bc), but our experimental accuracy does not allow us to distinguish a and a∗ , which differ by less than 2 ◦

    work page

  25. [25]

    Schlueter, U

    J.A. Schlueter, U. Geiser, and J.L. Man- son, Anionic dicyanamide frameworks as pos- sible components of multifunctional materials, J. Phys. IV (France) 114, 475 (2004)

    work page 2004

  26. [26]

    Riedl, R

    K. Riedl, R. Valent ´ ı, and S. M. Winter, Critical spin liq- uid versus valence-bond glass in a triangular-lattice or- ganic antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun. 10, 2561 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Miksch, A

    B. Miksch, A. Pustogow, M. Javaheri Rahim, M. Schef- fler, A. A. Bardin, K. Kanoda, J. A. Schlueter, R. H¨ ubner, and M. Dressel, Gapped magnetic ground state in quantum spin-liquid candidate κ-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu2(CN)3, Science 372, 276 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Schmidt, S

    M. Schmidt, S. Priya, Z. Huang, M. Kartsovnik, N. Kushch, and M. Dressel, Electronic properties of the dimerized organic conductor κ-(BETS)2Mn[N(CN)2]3, Phys. Rev. B 110, 195128 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    The crystal axes were determined by optical methods [26], but there re- mained some error in aligning the b-axis parallel to the rotation axis

    Due to the shape of the crystal, the measurement in bc- plane is more reliable than in ac-plane. The crystal axes were determined by optical methods [26], but there re- mained some error in aligning the b-axis parallel to the rotation axis. For that reason, the two runs arrive at dif- ferent g-values for H ∥ c

    work page

  30. [30]

    Riedel and R

    E. Riedel and R. Willett, The temperature de- pendence of the angular variation of, and the critical point exponent for the EPR linewidth in the two-dimensional canted antiferromagnetic (C2H5NH3)2MnBr4: Evidence for a structural phase transition, Solid State Commun. 16, 413 (1975)

    work page 1975

  31. [31]

    Tamura and R

    M. Tamura and R. Kato, Magnetic susceptibility of β ′-[Pd(dmit)2] salts (dmit = 1, 3-dithiol-2-thione-4, 5- dithiolate, C 3S5): evidence for frustration in spin- 1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnets on a triangular lattice, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, L729 (2002)

    work page 2002

  32. [32]

    J. M. Williams, J. R. Ferraro, R. J. Thorn, K. D. Carl- son, U. Geiser, H. H. Wang, A. M. Kini, and M. H. Whangbo, Organic Superconductors (Prentice Hall, En- glewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992)

    work page 1992

  33. [33]

    Oshima, H

    Y. Oshima, H. Nojiri, S. Uji, J. S. Brooks, T. Tokumoto, H.-B. Cui, R. Kato, A. Kobayashi, and H. Kobayashi, Breakdown of the field-induced superconductivity by dy- namical spin reversal, Phys. Rev. B 86, 024525 (2012)

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    T. Lee, Y. Oshima, H. Cui, and R. Kato, Detailed X-band studies of the π -d molecular conductor λ -(BETS)2FeCl4: Observation of anomalous angular dependence of the g- value, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 114702 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Bencini and D

    A. Bencini and D. Gatteschi, EPR of Exchange Coupled Systems (Spinger Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1990)

    work page 1990

  36. [36]

    M. Dumm, A. Loidl, B. W. Fravel, K. P. Starkey, L. K. Montgomery, and M. Dressel, Electron spin res- onance studies on the organic linear-chain compounds (TMTCF)2X (C = S, Se; X = PF 6, AsF 6, ClO 4, Br), Phys. Rev. B 61, 511 (2000)

    work page 2000

  37. [37]

    Pilawa, Anisotropy of the elec- tron spin-resonance linewidth of cugeo 3, J

    B. Pilawa, Anisotropy of the elec- tron spin-resonance linewidth of cugeo 3, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 3779 (1997)

    work page 1997

  38. [38]

    The change in linewidth due to anisotropic Zeeman interaction is of the order 10 mT because in Eqs

    We note that c∆ HAZ is just a fit parameter, and does not correspond to a real field. The change in linewidth due to anisotropic Zeeman interaction is of the order 10 mT because in Eqs. (

    work page

  39. [39]

    and ( 11) c∆ HAZ is multiplied by (δg)2 ≈ 10− 4

    work page

  40. [40]

    Yasin, B

    S. Yasin, B. Salameh, E. Rose, M. Dumm, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, A. Loidl, M. Ozerov, G. Untere- iner, L. Montgomery, and M. Dressel, Broken mag- netic symmetry due to charge-order ferroelectricity dis- covered in (TMTTF) 2X salts by multifrequency ESR, Phys. Rev. B 85, 144428 (2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    Dressel, M

    M. Dressel, M. Dumm, T. Knoblauch, and M. Masino, Comprehensive optical investigations of charge or- der in organic chain compounds (TMTTF) 2X, Crystals 2, 528 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- tome, and H. Seo, Anomalous hall effect in κ-type organic antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 075112 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Iguchi, H

    S. Iguchi, H. Kobayashi, Y. Ikemoto, T. Furukawa, H. Itoh, S. Iwai, T. Moriwaki, and T. Sasaki, Magneto-optical spectra of an organic antifer- romagnet as a candidate for an altermagnet, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 033026 (2025)

    work page 2025

  46. [46]

    U. Welp, S. Fleshler, W. K. Kwok, G. W. Crabtree, K. D. Carlson, H. H. Wang, U. Geiser, J. M. Williams, and V. M. Hitsman, Weak ferromagnetism in κ-(ET)2- Cu[N(CN)2]Cl, where (ET) is bis-(ethylenedithio)tetra- thiafulvalene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 840 (1992)

    work page 1992

  47. [47]

    Miyagawa, A

    K. Miyagawa, A. Kawamoto, Y. Nakazawa, and K. Kan- oda, Antiferromagnetic ordering and spin structure in the organic conductor, κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1174 (1995)

    work page 1995

  48. [48]

    Kubota, G

    M. Kubota, G. Saito, H. Ito, T. Ishiguro, and N. Kojima, Magnetism of the organic su- perconductor κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 284, 367 (1996)

    work page 1996

  49. [49]

    Pinteri´ c, M

    M. Pinteri´ c, M. Miljak, N. Bi¸ skup, O. Milat, I. Aviani, S. Tomi´ c, D. Schweitzer, W. Strunz, and I. Heinen, Magnetic anisotropy and low- frequency dielectric response of weak ferromagnetic phase in κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl, where BEDT-TTF is bis(ethylenedithio)tetrathiafulvalene, Eur. Phys. J. B 11, 217 (1999)

    work page 1999

  50. [50]

    Antal, T

    A. Antal, T. Feh´ er, A. J´ anossy, E. T´ atrai-Szekeres, and F. F¨ ul¨ op, Spin diffusion and magnetic eigenoscilla- tions confined to single molecular layers in the organic conductors κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]X (X=Cl, Br), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 086404 (2009)

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    Yasin, M

    S. Yasin, M. Dumm, B. Salameh, P. Batail, C. Me´ zi` ere, and M. Dressel, Transport studies at the mott transition of the two-dimensional or- ganic metal κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]BrxCl1− x, Eur. Phys. J. B 79, 383 (2011)

    work page 2011

  52. [52]

    Ishikawa, H

    R. Ishikawa, H. Tsunakawa, K. Oinuma, S. Michimura, H. Taniguchi, K. Satoh, Y. Ishii, and H. Okamoto, Zero-field spin structure and spin reorientations in layered organic antiferromagnet, κ-(BEDT- TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl, with Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 064701 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    Nevertheless, detailed ESR studies of the angular dependent linewidth might reveal interesting in- formation on the dynamic spin response

    In κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl the molecules in adja- cent layers are tilted in opposite directions, which makes it difficult to observe anisotropic Zeeman interactions 9 [45, 47, 48]. Nevertheless, detailed ESR studies of the angular dependent linewidth might reveal interesting in- formation on the dynamic spin response. In general, an- gular dependent ESR e...

    work page