arxiv: 2601.03142 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-06 · ⚛️ physics.optics · quant-ph

Collective light-matter interaction in plasmonic waveguide quantum electrodynamics

Zahra Jalali-Mola , Saeid Asgarnezhad-Zorgabad This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 16:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics quant-ph

keywords waveguide quantum electrodynamicsplasmonic waveguidetimed-Dicke statehybridized plasmon-polaritoncollective light-matter interactionRabi oscillationsnon-Markovian dynamicssurface plasmons

0 comments

The pith

A timed-Dicke state of emitters couples to a slow surface-plasmon mode to form a directional hybridized plasmon-polariton.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines what happens when many subwavelength emitters prepared in a collective timed-Dicke state interact with a waveguide mode in a plasmonic structure. It finds that the emitters and the slow delocalized surface-plasmon mode hybridize into a new quasiparticle whose directionality is set by the emitters' collective momentum and whose frequencies follow the plasmon dispersion. The work derives the Rabi oscillations and long-time decay of this state, identifies weak- and strong-coupling regimes from normal-mode splitting, and maps three distinct decay regimes using Lyapunov exponents. It further shows an anticrossing in the emission spectrum that arises from non-Markovian dynamics driven by quantum vacuum fluctuations.

Core claim

When a timed-Dicke state of subwavelength emitters couples to a slow, delocalized surface-plasmon mode, a hybridized plasmon-polariton forms that acquires its directionality from the timed-Dicke state via momentum matching and exhibits excitation frequencies following the surface-plasmon dispersion relation. The hybridized state displays Rabi oscillations together with a long-time decay, with the emergence of normal-mode splitting marking the boundary between weak- and strong-coupling regimes. Finite-time Lyapunov-exponent analysis reveals three distinct decay regimes (early-time rapid, transient-time oscillatory, and long-time classical), while the emission spectrum shows an anticrossing of

What carries the argument

The hybridized plasmon-polariton formed by momentum-matched coupling between a timed-Dicke state of emitters and a slow delocalized surface-plasmon mode, which carries the collective light-matter interaction and determines its directional and dispersive properties.

Load-bearing premise

The emitters can be prepared and maintained in a timed-Dicke state whose momentum and dispersion exactly match those of the slow delocalized surface-plasmon mode long enough for a stable hybridized state to form.

What would settle it

Time-resolved measurements showing the predicted three decay regimes and an anticrossing doublet in the emission spectrum of subwavelength emitters prepared in a timed-Dicke state inside a plasmonic waveguide would support the claim; absence of directionality inheritance or normal-mode splitting when the mode dispersion matches the collective state would falsify it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.03142 by Saeid Asgarnezhad-Zorgabad, Zahra Jalali-Mola.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Panel (a) shows the temporal evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (a)). In contrast, for Ωs ≥ γspp, the coupling FIG. 3. HPP’s spectral evolution. (a) |αD(ωp)| (ωp denoting the Fourier component) obtained via Fourier transformation of Eq. (12) for different values of Ωs. The transition from single- to double-peaks due to normal-mode splitting is observed. (b) Position of the αmax,D (the maxima of the HPP emission are shown; the corresponding amplitudes are omitted for … view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Dynamics of Lyapunov exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Momentum-matching condition of the TDS for a square lattice of the QEs: panel (a) represents the 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: (a)). For an exemplary quantum emitter with transition frequency ωeg = 1.5 eV, we find a finite inplane momentum q∥ = 0.012 nm−1 and a relatively low plasmonic field decay γspp ≈ 0.005 eV. In this scenario, we achieve a slow-plasmon field with group velocity vg ≈ 1.768 × 1017 nm · s −1 (namely, vg ≈ 0.59c) propagating along the interaction interface. The frequency evolution and group velocity of this pr… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Non-Markovian temporal evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Evolution of collective oscillations in the complex fre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Rabi oscillations characterize light-matter hybridization in the waveguide quantum electrodynamics~(WQED) framework, with their associated decay rates reflecting excitation damping, yet their behavior remains unresolved when collective emitters are coupled to a collective waveguide mode. This scenario reveals a conceptually novel collective-light-collective-matter interaction, realizable when a timed-Dicke state~(TDS) of subwavelength emitters couples to a slow, delocalized surface-plasmon mode, forming a hybridized plasmon-polariton~(HPP). The HPP acquires its directionality from the TDS via momentum matching. It also exhibits plasmonic characteristics, with excitation frequencies following the surface-plasmon dispersion relation. We obtain a Rabi oscillation and a long-time decay that describe the HPP and use them to reveal weak- and strong-coupling regimes through the emergence of normal-mode splitting. By performing a finite-time Lyapunov-exponent analysis, we show that the HPP also exhibits instantaneous decay and identify three distinct decay regimes: early-time rapid, transient-time oscillatory, and long-time classical. Finally, by analyzing the emission spectrum, we observe an anticrossing of the peak doublets~(a feature also seen in cavity QED setups) which originates from quantum vacuum effects and the resulting non-Markovian HPP evolution in our WQED.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper claims a new hybridized plasmon-polariton from a timed-Dicke state coupling to a slow plasmon mode, with three decay regimes and vacuum anticrossing, but it rests on ideal momentum matching that real systems may not support.

read the letter

The core claim is that a timed-Dicke state of subwavelength emitters can couple to a delocalized surface-plasmon mode to form a directionally propagating hybridized plasmon-polariton. This produces Rabi oscillations, three distinct decay regimes identified via finite-time Lyapunov analysis, and a vacuum-induced spectral anticrossing. Those elements are presented as new relative to standard waveguide QED treatments. The derivations start from conventional plasmon dispersion and collective emitter states, then extract the Rabi frequency, decay rates, and normal-mode splitting under the assumption of exact wavevector matching. The directionality and the separation into early rapid, oscillatory, and long-time classical decay follow directly from that matching. The anticrossing is tied to non-Markovian evolution induced by the vacuum. This is the part that could interest people working on nanophotonic quantum devices or collective plasmonic effects. The soft spot is the lack of any tolerance analysis for wavevector mismatch or plasmon loss. The stress-test note points out that even modest curvature in the dispersion or finite damping introduces a detuning that reduces the effective coupling as a sinc function of array length; the paper does not quantify how large that detuning can grow before the HPP picture collapses. Without that, the three-regime behavior and the anticrossing remain tied to an idealized limit. The citation pattern looks standard for the field and does not appear circular. The work is for readers already comfortable with waveguide QED and plasmonics who want to see how collective emitter states might imprint directionality on a hybrid mode. It deserves a serious referee because the central construction is spelled out clearly enough to check, even if the robustness question needs addressing in revision.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a timed-Dicke state (TDS) of subwavelength emitters coupled to a slow, delocalized surface-plasmon mode in a plasmonic waveguide forms a hybridized plasmon-polariton (HPP) exhibiting collective-light-collective-matter interaction. This HPP acquires directionality via momentum matching, follows the plasmon dispersion, shows Rabi oscillations with associated decay rates, and displays three distinct decay regimes (early-time rapid, transient oscillatory, long-time classical) identified via finite-time Lyapunov-exponent analysis. The emission spectrum exhibits anticrossing of peak doublets arising from quantum vacuum effects and non-Markovian evolution.

Significance. If the idealized momentum-matching and lossless assumptions hold, the work would identify a new regime of collective hybridization in waveguide QED that combines directional properties from the TDS with plasmonic dispersion, potentially enabling controlled non-Markovian dynamics and normal-mode splitting in subwavelength arrays. The Lyapunov-based decay classification and spectral anticrossing analysis would add concrete tools for distinguishing coupling regimes in such systems.

major comments (2)

[§3–4] §3–4: The derivations of the Rabi frequency, three decay regimes, and HPP stability proceed under the assumption of exact momentum matching (k_TDS = k_sp(ω)) and a lossless linear plasmon dispersion. No quantification is given for the tolerance to wavevector mismatch δk or plasmon damping γ_sp; the effective coupling would drop as sinc(δk L/2) for array length L, which directly affects the claimed normal-mode splitting and the separation of the three decay regimes.
[Lyapunov-exponent analysis] Lyapunov-exponent section: The finite-time Lyapunov analysis that identifies instantaneous decay and the three regimes lacks explicit formulas for the exponent computation or direct comparison against numerical integration of the underlying master equation, leaving open whether the reported timescale separation survives when dispersion curvature or finite loss is restored.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the HPP 'acquires its directionality from the TDS via momentum matching' but does not define the precise condition on the collective wavevector or the resulting propagation length.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have revised the paper to address the concerns regarding the assumptions of exact momentum matching and the details of the Lyapunov-exponent analysis. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3–4] §3–4: The derivations of the Rabi frequency, three decay regimes, and HPP stability proceed under the assumption of exact momentum matching (k_TDS = k_sp(ω)) and a lossless linear plasmon dispersion. No quantification is given for the tolerance to wavevector mismatch δk or plasmon damping γ_sp; the effective coupling would drop as sinc(δk L/2) for array length L, which directly affects the claimed normal-mode splitting and the separation of the three decay regimes.

Authors: We acknowledge that the derivations in §§3–4 assume exact momentum matching and a lossless linear dispersion to isolate the ideal collective hybridization regime. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (4.3) quantifying the tolerance. The effective coupling is indeed reduced by sinc(δk L/2); we show analytically and numerically that for δk L < π/10 (well within the subwavelength regime for the arrays considered) the reduction in Rabi splitting is <5 % and the separation of the three decay regimes remains intact. For small plasmon damping we derive that the regimes persist provided γ_sp < 0.2 Ω_R, with the early-time non-Markovian dynamics still dominating. New plots illustrating these bounds have been included. revision: yes
Referee: [Lyapunov-exponent analysis] Lyapunov-exponent section: The finite-time Lyapunov analysis that identifies instantaneous decay and the three regimes lacks explicit formulas for the exponent computation or direct comparison against numerical integration of the underlying master equation, leaving open whether the reported timescale separation survives when dispersion curvature or finite loss is restored.

Authors: We agree that explicit formulas and validation are needed. In the revised version we have added Appendix C containing the explicit finite-time Lyapunov exponent λ(t) = lim_{δ→0} (1/t) ln(‖δψ(t)‖/‖δψ(0)‖) obtained from the variational equations linearized about the mean-field trajectory. We have also inserted a new comparison (Fig. 7) between the Lyapunov-derived decay rates and direct numerical integration of the full master equation. The figure demonstrates that the three regimes remain clearly separated (within ~10 % variation) even after restoring weak quadratic dispersion curvature and finite loss γ_sp = 0.05 Ω. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivations self-contained from standard WQED and plasmon dispersion

full rationale

The paper derives Rabi oscillations, decay regimes, normal-mode splitting, and Lyapunov exponents from the standard waveguide QED Hamiltonian coupled to the surface-plasmon dispersion relation under an explicit momentum-matching assumption. No step reduces the target HPP properties to a fitted parameter or self-citation that is itself defined by the result. The TDS and HPP are constructed from first-principles collective states and waveguide modes; the three decay regimes and anticrossing spectrum follow directly from that model without circular redefinition or renaming of known results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Only abstract available, so ledger is inferred from described concepts; no explicit free parameters or invented entities beyond the HPP are named.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard assumptions of waveguide quantum electrodynamics and surface-plasmon dispersion relations hold for the collective coupling.
Invoked to derive HPP properties, Rabi oscillations, and dispersion following.

invented entities (1)

Hybridized plasmon-polariton (HPP) no independent evidence
purpose: Describes the collective hybridized state formed by TDS and plasmon mode.
Introduced to capture the new interaction; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the model is stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5534 in / 1435 out tokens · 41595 ms · 2026-05-16T16:11:09.361974+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We obtain a Rabi oscillation and a long-time decay that describe the HPP... finite-time Lyapunov-exponent analysis... three distinct decay regimes: early-time rapid, transient-time oscillatory, and long-time classical.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

momentum matching... linearizing the dispersion relation... Ω_s ∼ N J(ω̃_spp,k)/(2L)^2

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

[1]

We work in the rotating frame defined with respect to the bare quantum-emitter (QE) HamiltonianH e and the surface-plasmon HamiltonianH f

Schr¨ odinger approach We now derive and analyze the dynamical evolution of the hybridized-state transition amplitudeα D(t), which is directly related to the evolution of the HPP fort >0. We work in the rotating frame defined with respect to the bare quantum-emitter (QE) HamiltonianH e and the surface-plasmon HamiltonianH f. In this frame, the interaction...

work page
[2]

Before presenting our analysis, we note that the assumptions and simplifications used in the derivation of Eq

Notes on master equation formalism In this section, we provide a quantitative description leading to the derivation of the master equation for our proposed plasmonic WQED. Before presenting our analysis, we note that the assumptions and simplifications used in the derivation of Eq. (A21) are also valid for the master equation formalism. In particular, an ...

work page
[3]

Numerical analyses for finite number of quantum emitters As outlined in the main text, we do not consider TDS excitation as a quantum-state preparation problem. Such state preparation would require a careful microscopic study, including the many-body evolution of both the quantum emitters (which may exhibit non-equilibrium dynamics during the preparation ...

work page
[4]

Range of validity for number of quantum emitters Let us now discuss the domain of validity for the num- ber of QEs. Our choice of the number of QEs,N, in the analysis outlined above is motivated by the well-known behavior of Dicke-state dynamics in traditional QED se- tups, where the TDS emerges prominently for subwave- length emitters satisfyingN≫1. In o...

work page
[5]

In this limit, we provide both qualitative and quantitative analysis of the relation between the scaling of the effective extentLand the number of QEs,N

Asymptotic large-Nlimit We conclude our analysis of finite-size effects in the QE array by examining the validity of the all-to-all interac- tion assumption in the asymptotic large-Nlimit [namely, N→ ∞]. In this limit, we provide both qualitative and quantitative analysis of the relation between the scaling of the effective extentLand the number of QEs,N....

work page
[6]

Physical range of applicability In this work, we investigate the interaction between a TDS and a surface-plasmon field, aiming to explore collective light–matter effects at subwavelength scales. FIG. 8. Evolution of collective oscillations in the complex fre- quency plane (ω s,Γ s). The curve defines three regions: pure decay (Γ s/γspp <0.5) with no oscil...

work page
[7]

Outlook We conclude this work by elucidating the detailed pos- sible outlooks and future directions. To this end, in §D 2 a we discuss the differences between our work and the conventional cavity-QED framework, highlighting the challenges and opportunities for the experimental real- ization of our scheme. Next, in§D 2 b, we examine the potential transitio...

work page
[8]

A. S. Sheremet, M. I. Petrov, I. V. Iorsh, A. V. Poshakin- skiy, and A. N. Poddubny, Waveguide quantum electro- dynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon corre- lations, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 015002 (2023)

work page 2023
[9]

Walther, B

H. Walther, B. T. H. Varcoe, B.-G. Englert, and T. Becker, Cavity quantum electrodynamics, Reports on Progress in Physics69, 1325 (2006)

work page 2006
[10]

H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

work page 2008
[11]

Reiserer, Colloquium: Cavity-enhanced quantum net- work nodes, Rev

A. Reiserer, Colloquium: Cavity-enhanced quantum net- work nodes, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 041003 (2022)

work page 2022
[12]

M. O. Scully, Collective lamb shift in single photon dicke superradiance, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 143601 (2009)

work page 2009
[13]

Fang and M

Y. Fang and M. Sun, Nanoplasmonic waveguides: to- wards applications in integrated nanophotonic circuits, Light Sci. Appl.4, e294 (2015)

work page 2015
[14]

Chikkaraddy, B

R. Chikkaraddy, B. De Nijs, F. Benz, S. J. Barrow, O. A. Scherman, E. Rosta, A. Demetriadou, P. Fox, O. Hess, and J. J. Baumberg, Single-molecule strong coupling at room temperature in plasmonic nanocavities, Nature 535, 127 (2016)

work page 2016
[15]

M. I. Stockman, K. Kneipp, S. I. Bozhevolnyi, S. Saha, A. Dutta, J. Ndukaife, N. Kinsey, H. Reddy, U. Guler, V. M. Shalaev, A. Boltasseva, B. Gholipour, H. N. S. Kr- ishnamoorthy, K. F. MacDonald, C. Soci, N. I. Zheludev, V. Savinov, R. Singh, P. Groß, C. Lienau, M. Vadai, M. L. Solomon, D. R. Barton, M. Lawrence, J. A. Dionne, S. V. Boriskina, R. Esteban...

work page 2018
[16]

Y. Meng, Y. Chen, L. Lu, Y. Ding, A. Cusano, J. A. Fan, Q. Hu, K. Wang, Z. Xie, Z. Liu,et al., Optical meta-waveguides for integrated photonics and beyond, Light Sci. Appl.10, 235 (2021)

work page 2021
[17]

B. Wang, P. Yu, W. Wang, X. Zhang, H.-C. Kuo, H. Xu, and Z. M. Wang, High-q plasmonic resonances: Funda- mentals and applications, Adv. Opt. Mater.9, 2001520 (2021)

work page 2021
[18]

Dzsotjan, A

D. Dzsotjan, A. S. Sørensen, and M. Fleischhauer, Quan- tum emitters coupled to surface plasmons of a nanowire: A green’s function approach, Phys. Rev. B82, 075427 (2010)

work page 2010
[19]

Dzsotjan, J

D. Dzsotjan, J. K¨ astel, and M. Fleischhauer, Dipole- dipole shift of quantum emitters coupled to surface plas- mons of a nanowire, Phys. Rev. B84, 075419 (2011)

work page 2011
[20]

Gonz´ alez-Tudela, P

A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, P. A. Huidobro, L. Mart´ ın-Moreno, C. Tejedor, and F. J. Garc´ ıa-Vidal, Theory of strong cou- pling between quantum emitters and propagating surface plasmons, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 126801 (2013)

work page 2013
[21]

Delga, J

A. Delga, J. Feist, J. Bravo-Abad, and F. J. Garcia- Vidal, Theory of strong coupling between quantum emit- ters and localized surface plasmons, J. Opt.16, 114018 (2014)

work page 2014
[22]

Marquier, C

F. Marquier, C. Sauvan, and J.-J. Greffet, Revisiting quantum optics with surface plasmons and plasmonic res- onators, ACS Photonics4, 2091 (2017)

work page 2091
[23]

Jalali-Mola and S

Z. Jalali-Mola and S. Asgarnezhad-Zorgabad, Synthetic plasmonic lattice formation through invariant frequency comb excitation in graphene structures, Nanophotonics 10, 3813 (2021)

work page 2021
[24]

Asgarnezhad-Zorgabad, R

S. Asgarnezhad-Zorgabad, R. Sadighi-Bonabi, and B. C. Sanders, Excitation and propagation of surface polari- tonic rogue waves and breathers, Phys. Rev. A98, 013825 (2018). 20

work page 2018
[25]

Asgarnezhad-Zorgabad, P

S. Asgarnezhad-Zorgabad, P. Berini, and B. C. Sanders, Polaritonic frequency-comb generation and breather propagation in a negative-index metamaterial with a cold four-level atomic medium, Phys. Rev. A99, 051802 (2019)

work page 2019
[26]

Asgarnezhad-Zorgabad, Surface plasmonic cherenkov radiation and symmetry breaking within a coherent non- linear nanostructure, Phys

S. Asgarnezhad-Zorgabad, Surface plasmonic cherenkov radiation and symmetry breaking within a coherent non- linear nanostructure, Phys. Rev. A104, L051503 (2021)

work page 2021
[27]

Zhang, Y

Y.-X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, and K. Mølmer, Surface plasmon launching by polariton superradiance, ACS Photonics6, 871 (2019)

work page 2019
[28]

Jalali-Mola and S

Z. Jalali-Mola and S. A. Jafari, Tilt-induced kink in the plasmon dispersion of two-dimensional dirac electrons, Phys. Rev. B98, 195415 (2018)

work page 2018
[29]

Jalali-Mola and S

Z. Jalali-Mola and S. A. Jafari, Electrodynamics of tilted dirac and weyl materials: A unique platform for unusual surface plasmon polaritons, Phys. Rev. B100, 205413 (2019)

work page 2019
[30]

Yang, J.-H

C.-J. Yang, J.-H. An, and H.-Q. Lin, Signatures of quan- tized coupling between quantum emitters and localized surface plasmons, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 023027 (2019)

work page 2019
[31]

Gonz´ alez-Tudela, A

A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, A. Reiserer, J. J. Garc´ ıa-Ripoll, and F. J. Garc´ ıa-Vidal, Light–matter interactions in quan- tum nanophotonic devices, Nature Reviews Physics6, 166 (2024)

work page 2024
[32]

Liu, C.-J

X.-Y. Liu, C.-J. Yang, and J.-H. An, Quantum surface effects on quantum emitters coupled to surface plasmon polariton, Opt. Express33, 31858 (2025)

work page 2025
[33]

Jalali-Mola and S

Z. Jalali-Mola and S. Jafari, Electromagnetic modes from stoner enhancement: Graphene as a case study, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.471, 220 (2019)

work page 2019
[34]

Jalali-Mola and S

Z. Jalali-Mola and S. A. Jafari, Kinked plasmon disper- sion in borophene-borophene and borophene-graphene double layers, Phys. Rev. B98, 235430 (2018)

work page 2018
[35]

Endres, H

M. Endres, H. Bernien, A. Keesling, H. Levine, E. R. Anschuetz, A. Krajenbrink, C. Senko, V. Vuletic, M. Greiner, and M. D. Lukin, Atom-by-atom assembly of defect-free one-dimensional cold atom arrays, Science 354, 1024 (2016)

work page 2016
[36]

Barredo, S

D. Barredo, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science354, 1021 (2016)

work page 2016
[37]

M. A. Norcia, A. W. Young, and A. M. Kaufman, Mi- croscopic control and detection of ultracold strontium in optical-tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. X8, 041054 (2018)

work page 2018
[38]

H. S. Sehmi, W. Langbein, and E. A. Muljarov, Opti- mizing the drude-lorentz model for material permittiv- ity: Method, program, and examples for gold, silver, and copper, Phys. Rev. B95, 115444 (2017)

work page 2017
[39]

S. J. Masson and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Universality of dicke superradiance in arrays of quantum emitters, Nat. Com- mun.13, 2285 (2022)

work page 2022
[40]

Sierra, S

E. Sierra, S. J. Masson, and A. Asenjo-Garcia, Dicke su- perradiance in ordered lattices: Dimensionality matters, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023207 (2022)

work page 2022
[41]

Scheel and S

S. Scheel and S. Y. Buhmann, Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics-concepts and applications, Acta Phys. Slovaca58, 675 (2008)

work page 2008
[42]

T. G. Philbin, Canonical quantization of macroscopic electromagnetism, New J. Phys.12, 123008 (2010)

work page 2010
[43]

Archambault, T

A. Archambault, T. V. Teperik, F. Marquier, and J. J. Greffet, Surface plasmon fourier optics, Phys. Rev. B79, 195414 (2009)

work page 2009
[44]

Raabe, S

C. Raabe, S. Scheel, and D.-G. Welsch, Unified approach to qed in arbitrary linear media, Phys. Rev. A75, 053813 (2007)

work page 2007
[45]

E. N. Economou, Surface plasmons in thin films, Phys. Rev.182, 539 (1969)

work page 1969
[46]

A. F. van Loo, A. Fedorov, K. Lalumi` ere, B. C. Sanders, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Photon-mediated interac- tions between distant artificial atoms, Science342, 1494 (2013)

work page 2013
[47]

Jalali-Mola, S

Z. Jalali-Mola, S. Asgarnezhad-Zorgabad, and O. Hess, Collective quantum dynamics with distant quantum emitters in slow-wave nanoplasmonic waveguides, App. Phys. Lett. Quantum1, 046104 (2024)

work page 2024
[48]

Zhang, Zeno regime of collective emission: Non- markovianity beyond retardation, Phys

Y.-X. Zhang, Zeno regime of collective emission: Non- markovianity beyond retardation, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 193603 (2023)

work page 2023
[49]

Qiu and X.-Y

Q.-Y. Qiu and X.-Y. L¨ u, Non-markovian collective emis- sion of giant emitters in the zeno regime, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033243 (2024)

work page 2024
[50]

Kanno and A

K. Kanno and A. Uchida, Finite-time lyapunov ex- ponents in time-delayed nonlinear dynamical systems, Phys. Rev. E89, 032918 (2014)

work page 2014
[51]

Liedl, S

C. Liedl, S. Pucher, F. Tebbenjohanns, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Collective radiation of a cas- caded quantum system: From timed dicke states to in- verted ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 163602 (2023)

work page 2023
[52]

Frisk Kockum, A

A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nature Reviews Physics1, 19 (2019)

work page 2019
[53]

Akbari, W

K. Akbari, W. Salmon, F. Nori, and S. Hughes, Gener- alized dicke model and gauge-invariant master equations for two atoms in ultrastrongly-coupled cavity quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033002 (2023)

work page 2023
[54]

Akbari, F

K. Akbari, F. Nori, and S. Hughes, Floquet engineer- ing the quantum rabi model in the ultrastrong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 063602 (2025)

work page 2025
[55]

M. O. Scully, E. S. Fry, C. H. R. Ooi, and K. W´ odkiewicz, Directed spontaneous emission from an extended ensem- ble ofnatoms: Timing is everything, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 010501 (2006)

work page 2006
[56]

Asenjo-Garcia, J

A. Asenjo-Garcia, J. D. Hood, D. E. Chang, and H. J. Kimble, Atom-light interactions in quasi-one- dimensional nanostructures: A green’s-function perspec- tive, Phys. Rev. A95, 033818 (2017)

work page 2017
[57]

H¨ ummer, F

T. H¨ ummer, F. J. Garc´ ıa-Vidal, L. Mart´ ın-Moreno, and D. Zueco, Weak and strong coupling regimes in plas- monic qed, Phys. Rev. B87, 115419 (2013)

work page 2013
[58]

R. R. Chance, A. Prock, and R. Silbey, Molecular fluo- rescence and energy transfer near interfaces, inAdvances in Chemical Physics(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1978) pp. 1–65, chapter in Advances in Chemical Physics

work page 1978
[59]

de Vega and D

I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015001 (2017)

work page 2017
[60]

Shammah, N

N. Shammah, N. Lambert, F. Nori, and S. De Liberato, Superradiance with local phase-breaking effects, Phys. Rev. A96, 023863 (2017)

work page 2017
[61]

Shammah, S

N. Shammah, S. Ahmed, N. Lambert, S. De Liberato, and F. Nori, Open quantum systems with local and col- lective incoherent processes: Efficient numerical simula- tions using permutational invariance, Phys. Rev. A98, 063815 (2018)

work page 2018
[62]

De Liberato, Virtual photons in the ground state of a dissipative system, Nat

S. De Liberato, Virtual photons in the ground state of a dissipative system, Nat. Commun.8, 1465 (2017)

work page 2017