pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.03173 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-06 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.HC

Predicting Time Pressure of Powered Two-Wheeler Riders for Proactive Safety Interventions

Sumit S. Shevtekar , Chandresh K. Maurya , Gourab Sil This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 17:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.HC
keywords time pressure predictionpowered two-wheelersdeep learningcollision riskintelligent transportation systemsrider behaviorsafety interventionsmultivariate time series
0
0 comments X

The pith

A compact neural network classifies rider time pressure from vehicle sensors at 91.5 percent accuracy and raises collision risk forecasts when added as input.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper collects a large dataset of 129,000 labeled sequences from 153 controlled rides and shows that high time pressure produces faster speeds, greater variability, more risky turns, and harder braking. It introduces MotoTimePressure, a lightweight deep learning model that classifies no, low, and high time pressure states from 63 kinematic and control features. When the model's predictions are supplied to existing collision predictors, accuracy rises from 91.25 to 93.51 percent for Informer and from 92.10 to 93.90 percent for TimesNet, approaching the performance obtained with perfect knowledge of time pressure. The result supports real-time safety features that respond to rider cognitive load without direct physiological measurement.

Core claim

MotoTimePressure achieves 91.53 percent accuracy and 98.93 percent ROC AUC on time pressure classification and, when its outputs are used as features, lifts collision risk accuracy for Informer from 91.25 percent to 93.51 percent and for TimesNet from 92.10 percent to 93.90 percent, approaching oracle performance.

What carries the argument

MotoTimePressure, a neural network that applies convolutional preprocessing, dual-stage temporal attention, and Squeeze-and-Excitation recalibration to 63-feature multivariate time-series sequences to classify rider time pressure states.

If this is right

  • Predicted time pressure states can trigger adaptive alerts, haptic feedback, and speed guidance in real time.
  • Collision risk models gain accuracy by treating time pressure as an observable feature rather than an unobserved confounder.
  • Thresholded pressure levels enable V2I signaling that adjusts infrastructure responses to rider stress.
  • The same pipeline supports the Safe System Approach by treating cognitive load as a modifiable crash factor.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Deployment would require testing on uncontrolled public roads with diverse rider populations to confirm the controlled results generalize.
  • The model's small size and fast CPU inference make on-vehicle implementation feasible in current motorcycle electronics.
  • Extending the output from three discrete classes to a continuous pressure score could support finer-grained interventions.

Load-bearing premise

The controlled laboratory induction of no, low, and high time pressure conditions produces cognitive states that match those experienced by riders in ordinary traffic.

What would settle it

An on-road field study that records physiological stress markers alongside the same vehicle sensors and checks whether the model still classifies accurately and still improves collision forecasts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.03173 by Chandresh K. Maurya, Gourab Sil, Sumit S. Shevtekar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Registered motor vehicles in India by category (2003–2022) [36]. According to India’s Ministry of Road Transport and High￾ways (MoRTH), PTWs are the most prevalent and economical mode of transport in LMICs. Between 2003 and 2022, India’s registered vehicle population grew to 354 million, of which PTWs constituted 263 million (74.4%). This segment grew at a CAGR of 8.6%, surpassing buses (2.48%) and goods v… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows the snapshots of scenario development (vehicle paths, trigger events, route changes, and rider trajectories). C. Participants The vast majority of two-wheeler riders in India are male, as reflected in MoRTH road fatality statistics [31]–[35]. This (a) AI vehicle path (b) Trigger events and path (c) Intersections (d) Rider pathway [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Sample participant snapshots from two-wheeler simu￾lator sessions. 1) NTP: Ample time is provided, representing the baseline condition. 2) LTP: Riders are given 90% of the NTP duration to complete the task (e.g., Try not to be late). 3) HTP: Riders have 80% of baseline time, with urgency prompts (e.g., exam gate may close) to heighten stress. E. Behavioral Transition Under Exam Pressure: Why LTP Matters In… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the experimental design and protocol with four phases: (i) Briefing: simulator familiarization and consent; (ii) Practice: 5–10 min trial ride (data excluded); (iii) Main Task: three rides under NTP, LTP, and HTP in counterbalanced order; and (iv) Rest: 5 min break to reduce fatigue. This design allows systematic assessment of rider behavior under varying TP. Each participant performed three full rid… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: MotoTimePressure (MTPS) architecture for predicting rider time-pressure states. stacked 1D convolutional layers to capture short-term riding maneuvers: H (1) = ReLU(W(1) ∗X+b (1)), H(2) = ReLU(W(2) ∗H (1)+b (2)) (1) where H(1) ∈ R 64×T , H(2) ∈ R 128×T , ∗ denotes 1D convolution, and W(l) ∈ R kl×Cl−1×Cl . These layers extract local TP signatures such as sudden braking, rapid throttle inputs, and steering o… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Performance comparison: (a) ROC curves and (b) calibration curves. 4) Calibration and Transition Across TP States: The MTPS calibration curve (Fig. 7b) shows predicted probabilities P(k | xt) closely match observed frequencies Pr c = k, enabling their use as confidence scores for ITS interventions. Thresh￾olds map outputs along NTP → LTP → HTP, with rider states inferred from multivariate patterns (speed, … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Confusion matrix of MTPS logits zk(t) for each class k ∈ {NTP, LTP, HTP}. The softmax function gives class probabilities: P(k | xt) = exp(zk(t)) P j∈{NTP,LTP,HTP} exp(zj (t)), (10) where P(k | xt) ∈ [0, 1] and P k P(k | xt) = 1. Thus, MTPS outputs P(t) = [P(NTP | xt), P(LTP | xt), P(HTP | xt)]. The predicted class and confidence are: cˆ(t) = arg max k P(k | xt), s(t) = max k P(k | xt), (11) where cˆ(t) den… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: MTPS calibrated TP prediction framework for PTW safety. VII. APPLICATIONS OF PREDICTED TP A. Significance of Predicted MTPS TP for Collision Prediction This section illustrates the significance of MTPS-predicted TP by showing how its integration as an input to the Informer substantially improves downstream collision prediction accu￾racy. 1) Evaluation of MTPS-Predicted TP: Direct measurement of GT TP label… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Time pressure critically influences risky maneuvers and crash proneness among powered two-wheeler riders, yet its prediction remains underexplored in intelligent transportation systems. We present a large-scale dataset of 129,000+ labeled multivariate time-series sequences from 153 rides by 51 participants under No, Low, and High Time Pressure conditions. Each sequence captures 63 features spanning vehicle kinematics, control inputs, behavioral violations, and environmental context. Our empirical analysis shows High Time Pressure induces 48% higher speeds, 36.4% greater speed variability, 58% more risky turns at intersections, 36% more sudden braking, and 50% higher rear brake forces versus No Time Pressure. To benchmark this dataset, we propose MotoTimePressure, a deep learning model combining convolutional preprocessing, dual-stage temporal attention, and Squeeze-and-Excitation feature recalibration, achieving 91.53% accuracy and 98.93% ROC AUC, outperforming six baselines, with only 172K parameters, 0.66 MB model size, and 0.21 ms inference on CPU. Since time pressure cannot be directly measured in real time, we demonstrate its utility in collision prediction and threshold determination. Using MTPS-predicted time pressure as a feature improves collision risk accuracy for both Informer (91.25% to 93.51%) and TimesNet (92.10% to 93.90%), approaching oracle performance (93.72% and 94.06%, respectively). Thresholded time pressure states capture rider cognitive stress and enable proactive ITS interventions, including adaptive alerts, haptic feedback, V2I signaling, and speed guidance, supporting safer two-wheeler mobility under the Safe System Approach.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a dataset of over 129,000 labeled multivariate time-series sequences from 51 participants across 153 rides under controlled No, Low, and High Time Pressure conditions. It proposes the MotoTimePressure model combining convolutional preprocessing, dual-stage temporal attention, and Squeeze-and-Excitation recalibration, reporting 91.53% accuracy and 98.93% ROC AUC on time pressure classification while outperforming six baselines with a compact 172K-parameter architecture. The work further demonstrates that using the model's predictions as an additive feature improves collision risk prediction accuracy for Informer (91.25% to 93.51%) and TimesNet (92.10% to 93.90%), approaching oracle performance, and discusses applications for proactive ITS interventions.

Significance. If the empirical results hold under proper validation, the lightweight model and documented behavioral shifts (e.g., 48% higher speeds under high time pressure) provide a practical route to real-time cognitive stress estimation for two-wheeler safety systems. The additive gains in downstream collision models constitute a concrete, quantifiable contribution. However, the controlled induction setting without physiological or naturalistic corroboration limits the strength of claims about broader applicability to real-world proactive interventions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3] Section 3 (Dataset Construction): The train/validation/test splitting procedure for the 129k sequences is not specified (e.g., whether splits are ride-wise, participant-wise, or random), leaving open the possibility of temporal or inter-ride leakage that would directly affect the reliability of the 91.53% accuracy and 98.93% AUC figures.
  2. [Section 5.2] Section 5.2 (Collision Prediction Results): The reported accuracy lifts (Informer +2.26 pp, TimesNet +1.8 pp) are presented without statistical significance tests, confidence intervals, or ablation controls, so it is impossible to determine whether the gains over the base models are robust or within expected variance.
  3. [Section 6] Section 6 (Discussion and Limitations): The utility argument for proactive interventions assumes that the induced No/Low/High time pressure conditions produce kinematic signatures equivalent to real-world rider stress, yet no physiological ground truth (HRV, pupil metrics, or NASA-TLX) or cross-context validation is supplied; this assumption is load-bearing for the claimed downstream safety applications.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3] The exact total number of sequences after any exclusion rules and the precise definition of the 63 features should be stated explicitly in the dataset section for reproducibility.
  2. [Section 4] Baseline tables would be clearer if they included per-fold standard deviations or multiple random seeds rather than single-point metrics.
  3. [Section 2] A few sentences on related work in time-series attention for transportation safety (e.g., recent Informer/TimesNet extensions) would strengthen the positioning.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment point by point below, providing the strongest honest defense possible. Revisions will be made to clarify procedures and strengthen statistical reporting, while expanding the discussion of limitations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section 3] Section 3 (Dataset Construction): The train/validation/test splitting procedure for the 129k sequences is not specified (e.g., whether splits are ride-wise, participant-wise, or random), leaving open the possibility of temporal or inter-ride leakage that would directly affect the reliability of the 91.53% accuracy and 98.93% AUC figures.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation on a critical methodological detail. The splits were performed participant-wise (with all sequences from a given rider assigned to only one partition) to eliminate inter-participant and temporal leakage; rides were not split across sets. We will revise Section 3 to explicitly document this participant-wise strategy, the 70/15/15 proportions, and confirmation that sequences within each ride remain intact. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Section 5.2] Section 5.2 (Collision Prediction Results): The reported accuracy lifts (Informer +2.26 pp, TimesNet +1.8 pp) are presented without statistical significance tests, confidence intervals, or ablation controls, so it is impossible to determine whether the gains over the base models are robust or within expected variance.

    Authors: We agree that formal statistical validation strengthens the claims. In the revised version we will add McNemar’s tests for paired accuracy comparisons, report 95% confidence intervals on the improvements, and include ablation results that isolate the contribution of the predicted time-pressure feature. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Section 6] Section 6 (Discussion and Limitations): The utility argument for proactive interventions assumes that the induced No/Low/High time pressure conditions produce kinematic signatures equivalent to real-world rider stress, yet no physiological ground truth (HRV, pupil metrics, or NASA-TLX) or cross-context validation is supplied; this assumption is load-bearing for the claimed downstream safety applications.

    Authors: This is a fair critique of external validity. The study follows established controlled time-pressure induction protocols; we cannot retroactively collect physiological measures. We will expand Section 6 to explicitly acknowledge the absence of physiological corroboration, cite supporting literature on kinematic correlates of time pressure, and qualify the downstream safety claims accordingly while noting the observed collision-prediction gains as indirect evidence of utility. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper trains MotoTimePressure on experimentally induced time-pressure labels (No/Low/High) collected from 153 rides and evaluates classification accuracy plus downstream collision-prediction gains on held-out sequences. These are standard supervised results and additive-feature ablations; the reported numbers (91.53% accuracy, 98.93% AUC, 1.8–2.26 pp lifts) are not defined in terms of the fitted outputs themselves, nor do any equations or self-citations reduce the central claims to tautologies. The derivation chain therefore remains independent of its own fitted values.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the induced time-pressure labels and the assumption that the collected rides generalize; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • Time pressure condition thresholds
    The boundaries separating No, Low, and High time pressure are defined by the experimental protocol and chosen to produce measurable behavioral differences.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Induced experimental conditions map to genuine rider time pressure states
    The study assumes that the controlled manipulations reliably elicit the cognitive state labeled as time pressure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5624 in / 1350 out tokens · 52169 ms · 2026-05-16T17:10:50.722172+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Abdel-Aty and R

    M.A. Abdel-Aty and R. Pemmanaboina. Calibrating a real-time traffic crash-prediction model using archived weather and its traffic data.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 7(2):167–174, 2006

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    C ¸ .˙I. Acı, G. Mutlu, M. Ozen, and M. Acı. Enhanced multi-class driver injury severity prediction using a hybrid deep learning and random forest approach.Applied Sciences, 15(3):1586, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Charles Atombo, Chaozhong Wu, Ming Zhong, and Hui Zhang. Inves- tigating the motivational factors influencing drivers intentions to unsafe driving behaviours: Speeding and overtaking violations.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 43:104–121, 2016

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Powered two-wheeler riding pattern recognition using a machine- learning framework.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(1):475–487, 2015

    Ferhat Attal, Abderrahmane Boubezoul, Latifa Oukhellou, and St ´ephane Espi´e. Powered two-wheeler riding pattern recognition using a machine- learning framework.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(1):475–487, 2015

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    Powered two-wheelers critical events detection and recognition using data-driven approaches.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(12):4011–4022, 2018

    Ferhat Attal, Abderrahmane Boubezoul, Allou Sam ´e, Latifa Oukhellou, and St ´ephane Espi ´e. Powered two-wheelers critical events detection and recognition using data-driven approaches.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(12):4011–4022, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Analysis of factors associated with exceeding lawful speed traffic violations in indian metropolitan city.Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 13(2):206–222, 2021

    Venkatesh Balasubramanian and Sathish Kumar Sivasankaran. Analysis of factors associated with exceeding lawful speed traffic violations in indian metropolitan city.Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 13(2):206–222, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Barmpounakis, Eleni I

    Emmanouil N. Barmpounakis, Eleni I. Vlahogianni, and John C. Golias. Intelligent transportation systems and powered two wheelers traffic. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(4):908– 916, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Data-driven methodology for the investi- gation of riding dynamics: A motorcycle case study.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(9):10224–10237, 2023

    Mirco Bartolozzi, Abderrahmane Boubezoul, Samir Bouaziz, Giovanni Savino, and St ´ephane Espi ´e. Data-driven methodology for the investi- gation of riding dynamics: A motorcycle case study.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(9):10224–10237, 2023

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Safety of young children on motorized two-wheelers around the world: A review of the global epidemiological evidence.IATSS Research, 38(2):83–91, 2015

    Kavi Bhalla and Dinesh Mohan. Safety of young children on motorized two-wheelers around the world: A review of the global epidemiological evidence.IATSS Research, 38(2):83–91, 2015

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Bham and Ming C

    Ghulam H. Bham and Ming C. Leu. A driving simulator study to analyze the effects of portable changeable message signs on mean speeds of drivers.Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 10(1-2):45–71, 2018

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Driving-pattern identification and event detection based on an unsupervised learning framework: Case of a motorcycle-riding simulator.IEEE Access, 9:158456–158469, 2021

    Mohamed Yacine Bouaouni, Rayane Ait Ali Yahia, and Abderrahmane Boubezoul. Driving-pattern identification and event detection based on an unsupervised learning framework: Case of a motorcycle-riding simulator.IEEE Access, 9:158456–158469, 2021. 13

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Soukaina Bouhsissin, Nawal Sael, Faouzia Benabbou, and Abdelfettah Soultana. Enhancing machine learning algorithm performance through feature selection for driver behavior classification.International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Systems, 35(1):354–365, 2023

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Carrington, Douglas G

    Andre M. Carrington, Douglas G. Manuel, and Paul W.. Fieguth. Deep roc analysis and auc as balanced average accuracy, for improved classifier selection, audit and explanation.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(1):329–341, January 2023

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Powered two-wheeler riding behavior and strategies to improve safety: A review.Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 11(6):1378–1400, 2024

    Shivam Singh Chouhan, Ankit Kathuria, and Ravi Sekhar Chalumuri. Powered two-wheeler riding behavior and strategies to improve safety: A review.Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 11(6):1378–1400, 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Garefalakis, E

    T. Garefalakis, E. Michelaraki, S. Roussou, et al. Predicting risky driving behavior with classification algorithms: results from a large-scale field- trial and simulator experiment.European Transport Research Review, 16:65, 2024

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Velaga, and Sabyasachee Mishra

    Monik Gupta, Nishant Mukund Pawar, Nagendra R. Velaga, and Sabyasachee Mishra. Modeling distraction tendency of motorized two- wheeler drivers in time pressure situations.Safety Science, 154:105820, 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Monik Gupta and Nagendra R. Velaga. Motorized two-wheeler riders’ rear brake application in sudden hazardous event of animal crossing. Transportation Letters, 16(10):1268–1275, 2024

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Hedberg and Stephanie Ayers

    E.C. Hedberg and Stephanie Ayers. The power of a paired t-test with a covariate.Social Science Research, 50:277–291, 2015

    work page 2015

  19. [19]

    An experimental investigation of calibration techniques for imbalanced data.IEEE Access, 8:127343–127352, 2020

    Lanlan Huang, Junkai Zhao, Bing Zhu, Hao Chen, and Seppe Vanden Broucke. An experimental investigation of calibration techniques for imbalanced data.IEEE Access, 8:127343–127352, 2020

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

    Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  21. [21]

    Understanding speeding behavior from naturalistic driving data: Apply- ing classification based association rule mining.Accident Analysis & Prevention, 144, 2020

    Xiaoqiang Kong, Subasish Das, Kartikeya Jha, and Yunlong Zhang. Understanding speeding behavior from naturalistic driving data: Apply- ing classification based association rule mining.Accident Analysis & Prevention, 144, 2020

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Croft, Melinda L

    Sumie Leung, Rodney J. Croft, Melinda L. Jackson, Mark E. Howard, and Raymond J. Mckenzie. A comparison of the effect of mobile phone use and alcohol consumption on driving simulation performance.Traffic Injury Prevention, 13(6):566–574, 2012

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    Collision risk management of cognitively distracted drivers in a car-following situation.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60:288–298, 2019

    Xiaomeng Li, Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios, Andry Rakotonirainy, and Xuedong Yan. Collision risk management of cognitively distracted drivers in a car-following situation.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60:288–298, 2019

    work page 2019

  24. [24]

    Calibrating multimodal learning

    Huan Ma, Qingyang Zhang, Changqing Zhang, Bingzhe Wu, Huazhu Fu, Joey Tianyi Zhou, and Qinghua Hu. Calibrating multimodal learning. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning. JMLR.org, 2023

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    Michael, Manoj K

    Rajeev J. Michael, Manoj K. Sharma, Seema Mehrotra, Humera Banu, Rajesh Kumar, Paulomi M. Sudhir, and Neelima Chakrabarthy. Incli- nation to speeding and its correlates among two-wheeler riding indian youth.Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 23(2):105–110, 2014

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Road transport year book 2022–2023, 2023

    Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. Road transport year book 2022–2023, 2023

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Road transport year book 2023–2024, 2024

    Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. Road transport year book 2023–2024, 2024

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Road Transport Year Book 2021–2022, 2022

    Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MORTH). Road Transport Year Book 2021–2022, 2022

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Capacity estimation of unsignalized intersections under heterogeneous traffic conditions.Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 47(6):651–662, 2020

    Mithun Mohan and Satish Chandra. Capacity estimation of unsignalized intersections under heterogeneous traffic conditions.Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 47(6):651–662, 2020

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    Evaluation of driver accelera- tion/deceleration behavior at signalized intersections using vehicle tra- jectory data.Transportation Letters, 15(4):350–362, 2023

    Satyajit Mondal and Ankit Gupta. Evaluation of driver accelera- tion/deceleration behavior at signalized intersections using vehicle tra- jectory data.Transportation Letters, 15(4):350–362, 2023

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Road accidents in india – 2019

    MORTH. Road accidents in india – 2019. Technical report, Transport Research Wing, MoRTH, 2019

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Road accidents in india – 2020

    MoRTH. Road accidents in india – 2020. Technical report, Transport Research Wing, MoRTH, 2020

    work page 2020

  33. [33]

    Road accidents in india – 2021

    MoRTH. Road accidents in india – 2021. Technical report, Transport Research Wing, MoRTH, 2021

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Road accidents in india – 2022

    MORTH. Road accidents in india – 2022. Technical report, Transport Research Wing, MoRTH, 2022

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Road accidents in india – 2023

    MoRTH. Road accidents in india – 2023. Technical report, Transport Research Wing, MoRTH, 2023

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Ministry of road transport & highway (morth), 2024-25.Road Transport Year Book 2024–2025, 2025

    MORTH. Ministry of road transport & highway (morth), 2024-25.Road Transport Year Book 2024–2025, 2025

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Patil and Digvijay S

    Gopal R. Patil and Digvijay S. Pawar. Temporal and spatial gap acceptance for minor road at uncontrolled intersections in india.Trans- portation Research Record, 2461(1):129–136, 2014

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    Dissecting driver behaviors under cognitive, emotional, sensorimotor, and mixed stressors.Scientific Reports, 6:25651, 2016

    Ioannis Pavlidis, Malcolm Dcosta, Salah Taamneh, Michael Manser, Thomas Ferris, Rainer Wunderlich, Ergun Akleman, and Panagiotis Tsiamyrtzis. Dissecting driver behaviors under cognitive, emotional, sensorimotor, and mixed stressors.Scientific Reports, 6:25651, 2016

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    Nishant Mukund Pawar, Rashmeet Kaur Khanuja, Pushpa Choudhary, and Nagendra R. Velaga. Modelling braking behaviour and accident probability of drivers under increasing time pressure conditions.Acci- dent Analysis & Prevention, 136:105401, 2020

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Nishant Mukund Pawar and Nagendra R. Velaga. Analyzing the impact of time pressure on drivers’ safety by assessing gap-acceptance behavior at un-signalized intersections.Safety Science, 147:105582, 2022

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    Velaga, and Sabyasachee Mishra

    Nishant Mukund Pawar, Nagendra R. Velaga, and Sabyasachee Mishra. Impact of time pressure on acceleration behavior and crossing decision at the onset of yellow signal.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 87:1–18, 2022

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    Velaga, and R.B

    Nishant Mukund Pawar, Nagendra R. Velaga, and R.B. Sharmila. Exploring behavioral validity of driving simulator under time pressure driving conditions of professional drivers.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 89:29–52, 2022

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Deep learning model calibration for improving performance in class-imbalanced medical image classification tasks.PLOS ONE, 17(1):e0262838, 2022

    Sivaramakrishnan Rajaraman, Praveen Ganesan, and Sameer An- tani. Deep learning model calibration for improving performance in class-imbalanced medical image classification tasks.PLOS ONE, 17(1):e0262838, 2022

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Rendon-Velez, P

    E. Rendon-Velez, P. M . van Leeuwen, R. Happee, I. Horv ´ath, W.F. van der Vegte, and J.C.F. de Winter. The effects of time pressure on driver performance and physiological activity: A driving simulator study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 41:150–169, 2016

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Rash driving, fall in income, more pressure: Behind the scenes of 10-minute delivery.The Hindu, March 2022

    The Hindu Staff Reporter. Rash driving, fall in income, more pressure: Behind the scenes of 10-minute delivery.The Hindu, March 2022

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Delivery race brings road safety risks in india.The Jakarta Post, January 2022

    Reuters. Delivery race brings road safety risks in india.The Jakarta Post, January 2022

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    On using machine learning algorithms for motorcycle collision detection.Discover Applied Sciences, 6(6):326, 2024

    Philipp Rodegast, Steffen Maier, Jonas Kneifl, and J ¨org Fehr. On using machine learning algorithms for motorcycle collision detection.Discover Applied Sciences, 6(6):326, 2024

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    A study of motorcycle riders related to speeding behavior in thailand’s industrial zones.Scientific Reports, 14(1):29889, 2024

    Manlika Seefong, Panuwat Wisutwattanasak, and Rattanaporn Kasemsri. A study of motorcycle riders related to speeding behavior in thailand’s industrial zones.Scientific Reports, 14(1):29889, 2024

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Ishant Sharma, Monik Gupta, Sabyasachee Mishra, and Nagendra R. Velaga. Exploring the impact of time pressure on motorized two-wheeler riders’ over-speeding behavior.Transportation Letters, 17(4):595–611, 2025

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Racing against time: Quick commerce is pushing delivery riders to the edge, claims study.Fortune India, February 2025

    Fortune India Staff. Racing against time: Quick commerce is pushing delivery riders to the edge, claims study.Fortune India, February 2025

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Accidents, aberrant behaviours, and speeding of young moped riders.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(6):503–511, 2009

    Linda Steg and Annemarie van Brussel. Accidents, aberrant behaviours, and speeding of young moped riders.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(6):503–511, 2009

    work page 2009

  52. [52]

    Simplifying hypergraph neural networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05569, 2024

    Bohan Tang, Zexi Liu, Keyue Jiang, Siheng Chen, and Xiaowen Dong. Simplifying hypergraph neural networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05569, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Technotrove motorcycle driving sim- ulator

    Technotrove-Simulation-Pvt-Ltd. Technotrove motorcycle driving sim- ulator

    work page

  54. [54]

    Thundiyil, S.S

    S. Thundiyil, S.S. Shalamzari, J. Picone, and S. McKenzie. Transformers for modeling long-term dependencies in time series data: A review. In2023 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB), pages 1–5, 2023

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    Global status report on road safety, 2023.World Health Organization., 2023

    WHO. Global status report on road safety, 2023.World Health Organization., 2023

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Binomial proportion confidence interval – wilson score interval, 2025

    Wikipedia contributors. Binomial proportion confidence interval – wilson score interval, 2025. Accessed: 2025-09-09

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Ailing Zeng, Muxi Chen, Lei Zhang, and Qiang Xu. Are trans- formers effective for time series forecasting? InProceedings of the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on AI and Thirty-Fifth Confer- ence on Innovative Applications of AI and Thirteenth Symposium, AAAI’23/IAAI’23/EAAI’23. AAAI Press, 2023

    work page 2023

  58. [58]

    Variance analysis of factors that affected traffic safety in highway work zones

    Yanyan Zhang, Shunying Zhu, Hong Wang, Yanjie Hu, and Bing Liu. Variance analysis of factors that affected traffic safety in highway work zones. pages 72–81. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2012

    work page 2012

  59. [59]

    Car-following behavior of human-driven vehicles in mixed-flow traffic: A driving simulator study.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 8(4):2661–2673, 2023

    Anye Zhou, Yongyang Liu, Einat Tenenboim, Shubham Agrawal, and Srinivas Peeta. Car-following behavior of human-driven vehicles in mixed-flow traffic: A driving simulator study.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 8(4):2661–2673, 2023

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting

    Haoyi Zhou, Shanghang Zhang, Jieqi Peng, Shuai Zhang, Jianxin Li, Hui Xiong, and Wancai Zhang. Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, pages 11106–11115, 2021

    work page 2021