Generalized Bloch's Theorem for Cavity Exciton Polaron-Polaritons

Michael A.D. Taylor; Yu Zhang

arxiv: 2601.03230 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-06 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.other· physics.optics

Generalized Bloch's Theorem for Cavity Exciton Polaron-Polaritons

Michael A.D. Taylor , Yu Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 16:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.otherphysics.optics

keywords cavity exciton polaron-polaritonsgeneralized Bloch theoremtotal crystal momentumminimal-coupling representationFröhlich representationsymmetry-adapted framestrong couplingoptical responses

0 comments

The pith

A symmetry-adapted frame based on conserved total crystal momentum makes the Hamiltonian for cavity exciton polaron-polaritons block diagonal without approximations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that excitons coupled to cavity photons and phonons have their translational symmetry broken by momentum interchange in standard representations. By shifting to a symmetry-adapted frame that respects the conserved total crystal momentum, the Hamiltonian factors into independent blocks. This formulation directly gives the energy dispersions and optical responses of the resulting polaron-polaritons. A reader would care because it offers an exact method to explore strong light-matter coupling in materials without relying on approximations that might obscure key physics.

Core claim

Excitons coupled to cavity photons and phonons admit a generalized Bloch theorem when formulated for the conserved total crystal momentum. In minimal-coupling and Fröhlich representations the interchange of momenta between fermions and bosons breaks the translational symmetry of crystalline excitons. In the symmetry-adapted frame the Hamiltonian becomes block diagonal without approximations, yielding dispersions and optical responses of cavity exciton polaron-polaritons that enable investigations of material properties in strong coupling.

What carries the argument

The symmetry-adapted frame for conserved total crystal momentum, which block-diagonalizes the Hamiltonian by accounting for momentum interchange between particles.

If this is right

The dispersions of cavity exciton polaron-polaritons follow directly from the block-diagonal structure.
Optical responses can be computed exactly from the eigenstates in each momentum block.
This enables precise study of strong-coupling effects on material properties.
The generalized Bloch theorem holds for these hybrid systems without additional assumptions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This method could be applied to other systems where bosons and fermions exchange momentum, such as in electron-phonon coupled polaritons.
Small-system exact diagonalizations could test the block-diagonal property by checking for zero coupling between different total momenta.
Extensions might reveal how polaron effects modify polariton condensation thresholds in cavities.

Load-bearing premise

The total crystal momentum stays conserved despite the interchange of momenta between fermions and bosons in the minimal-coupling and Fröhlich representations.

What would settle it

A direct calculation of matrix elements between states with different total crystal momenta that shows non-zero coupling would falsify the block-diagonal claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.03230 by Michael A.D. Taylor, Yu Zhang.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Dispersion relation of exciton-polariton system with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Imaginary component of the dielectric function for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We show that excitons coupled to cavity photons and phonons admit a generalized Bloch theorem when formulated for the conserved total crystal momentum. In minimal-coupling and Fr\"ohlich representations, the interchange of momenta between fermions and bosons breaks crystalline excitons' translational symmetry. In our symmetry-adapted frame, the Hamiltonian becomes block diagonal, without invoking approximations. The resulting formulation yields dispersions and optical responses of cavity exciton polaron-polaritons, enabling investigations that elucidate material properties in strong coupling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a symmetry-based way to block-diagonalize the Hamiltonian for cavity exciton polaron-polaritons using total crystal momentum, but the exact conservation of that momentum after the fermion-boson interchange still needs checking.

read the letter

The main point is that the authors adapt Bloch's theorem to the total crystal momentum basis so the full Hamiltonian for excitons, cavity photons, and phonons becomes block diagonal without approximations. This handles the momentum exchange that breaks ordinary translational symmetry in the minimal-coupling and Fröhlich forms. The result is a practical route to dispersions and optical responses for these polaron-polariton states. That is the concrete advance: a symmetry-adapted frame that keeps the calculation exact rather than relying on perturbative or variational shortcuts. It is useful for anyone computing strong-coupling spectra in hybrid light-matter systems with lattice vibrations. The method looks clean and directly applicable to similar cavity QED setups. The soft spot sits at the conservation step. The claim requires that the total momentum operator still commutes with the transformed Hamiltonian after the momentum interchange between fermions and bosons. If the unitary frame change preserves that commutation exactly, the block structure holds as stated. If any residual terms appear, the no-approximation assertion would need qualification. The abstract asserts exactness, but the explicit basis construction and commutation check are what matter for . This is a specialized tool for condensed-matter and quantum-optics groups working on polariton-phonon problems. A reader already familiar with Fröhlich models or cavity polaritons would get immediate value from the reformulation. It deserves peer review so referees can verify the conservation property and the resulting spectra against known limits.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that excitons coupled to cavity photons and phonons admit a generalized Bloch theorem when the system is formulated in terms of the conserved total crystal momentum. In the minimal-coupling and Fröhlich representations, momentum interchange between fermions and bosons is handled by a symmetry-adapted frame in which the Hamiltonian becomes exactly block-diagonal without approximations, yielding dispersions and optical responses for cavity exciton polaron-polaritons.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the reformulation supplies a non-perturbative route to the spectrum and response functions of hybrid light-matter systems that preserves translational symmetry exactly. This would be useful for strong-coupling cavity QED in condensed-matter settings where both phonon dressing and photon hybridization are important.

major comments (1)

[Derivation of the symmetry-adapted frame] The assertion that the Hamiltonian is exactly block-diagonal rests on the claim that the total-momentum operator K remains conserved after the unitary frame transformation that accounts for fermion-boson momentum interchange. An explicit verification that [H, K] = 0 holds in the transformed frame (rather than only in the original basis) is required; without it the block-diagonal structure is not guaranteed to be exact.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the approach 'enables investigations that elucidate material properties' but does not specify which observables or material parameters are newly accessible; a concrete example would strengthen the claim.
[Introduction] Notation for the total crystal momentum K and the individual fermion and boson momenta should be introduced with an explicit equation early in the text to avoid ambiguity when the interchange is discussed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the significance of our work and for the constructive comment on the derivation. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript to include the requested explicit verification.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The assertion that the Hamiltonian is exactly block-diagonal rests on the claim that the total-momentum operator K remains conserved after the unitary frame transformation that accounts for fermion-boson momentum interchange. An explicit verification that [H, K] = 0 holds in the transformed frame (rather than only in the original basis) is required; without it the block-diagonal structure is not guaranteed to be exact.

Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the commutator in the transformed frame strengthens the presentation. The symmetry-adapted frame is constructed via a unitary operator U built from momentum-conserving operators (i.e., U commutes with K), so the transformed Hamiltonian H' = U H U† necessarily satisfies [H', K] = 0. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that derives this commutator explicitly, starting from the original [H, K] = 0 and showing how the transformation preserves it. This will make the exact block-diagonal structure fully transparent without approximations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; block-diagonal structure follows from assumed momentum conservation

full rationale

The derivation defines a symmetry-adapted frame using the total crystal momentum K (fermions + bosons) and shows the Hamiltonian is block-diagonal in that basis. This is a direct algebraic consequence of [H, K] = 0 once the frame is chosen; it does not reduce any claimed prediction or theorem to a fitted parameter or self-referential definition. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renaming of known results appear in the central steps. The result is self-contained given the conservation premise and receives the default low score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that total crystal momentum is conserved and can be used to label blocks exactly.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Total crystal momentum is a conserved quantity in the minimal-coupling and Fröhlich representations of the cavity exciton-phonon-photon system.
Invoked to define the symmetry-adapted frame that renders the Hamiltonian block diagonal.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5371 in / 1083 out tokens · 34544 ms · 2026-05-16T16:38:38.247564+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the Hamiltonian becomes block diagonal, without invoking approximations... restoring Bloch’s theorem for the CoM coordinate, X̂
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

unitary operator that transforms â_q e^{iq·X̂} → â_q ... boosts the CoM momentum as U†_ph P̂ U_ph = P̂ − sum q â†_q â_q

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

[1]

L. Qiu, A. Mandal, O. Morshed, M. T. Meidenbauer, W. Girten, P. Huo, A. N. Vamivakas, and T. D. Krauss, Molecular polaritons generated from strong coupling be- tween CdSe nanoplatelets and a dielectric optical cavity, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 5030 (2021)

work page 2021
[2]

T. E. Li, B. Cui, J. E. Subotnik, and A. Nitzan, Molecular polaritonics: Chemical dynamics under strong light–matter coupling, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.73, 10.1146/annurev-physchem-090519-042621 (2021)

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-090519-042621 2021
[3]

Schwartz, J

T. Schwartz, J. A. Hutchison, J. L´ eonard, C. Genet, S. Haacke, and T. W. Ebbesen, Polariton dynamics un- der strong light–molecule coupling, ChemPhysChem14, 125 (2013)

work page 2013
[4]

Thomas, J

A. Thomas, J. George, A. Shalabney, M. Dryzhakov, S. J. Varma, J. Moran, T. Chervy, X. Zhong, E. De- vaux, C. Genet, J. A. Hutchison, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ground-state chemical reactivity under vibrational cou- pling to the vacuum electromagnetic field, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.55, 11462 (2016)

work page 2016
[5]

Thomas, L

A. Thomas, L. Lethuillier-Karl, K. Nagarajan, R. M. A. Vergauwe, J. George, T. Chervy, A. Shalabney, E. De- vaux, C. Genet, J. Moran, and T. W. Ebbesen, Tilting a ground-state reactivity landscape by vibrational strong coupling, Science363, 615 (2019)

work page 2019
[6]

Thomas, A

A. Thomas, A. Jayachandran, L. Lethuillier-Karl, R. M. Vergauwe, K. Nagarajan, E. Devaux, C. Genet, J. Moran, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ground state chemistry under vibra- tional strong coupling: dependence of thermodynamic parameters on the rabi splitting energy, Nanophotonics 9, 249 (2020)

work page 2020
[7]

Thomas, E

A. Thomas, E. Devaux, K. Nagarajan, G. Rogez, M. Sei- del, F. Richard, C. Genet, M. Drillon, and T. W. Ebbe- sen, Large enhancement of ferromagnetism under a col- lective strong coupling of ybco nanoparticles, Nano Lett. 21, 4365 (2021)

work page 2021
[8]

R. M. A. Vergauwe, A. Thomas, K. Nagarajan, A. Sha- labney, J. George, T. Chervy, M. Seidel, E. Devaux, V. Torbeev, and T. W. Ebbesen, Modification of enzyme activity by vibrational strong coupling of water, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 15324 (2019)

work page 2019
[9]

T. W. Ebbesen, Hybrid light–matter states in a molecular and material science perspective, Acc. Chem. Res.49, 2403 (2016)

work page 2016
[10]

F. J. Garcia-Vidal, C. Ciuti, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ma- 6 nipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields, Science373, 10.1126/science.abd0336 (2021)

work page doi:10.1126/science.abd0336 2021
[11]

J. A. Hutchison, T. Schwartz, C. Genet, E. Devaux, and T. W. Ebbesen, Modifying chemical landscapes by cou- pling to vacuum fields, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.51, 1592 (2012)

work page 2012
[12]

George, T

J. George, T. Chervy, A. Shalabney, E. Devaux, H. Hiura, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen, Multiple rabi splittings under ultrastrong vibrational coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 153601 (2016)

work page 2016
[13]

Lather, P

J. Lather, P. Bhatt, A. Thomas, T. W. Ebbesen, and J. George, Cavity catalysis by cooperative vibra- tional strong coupling of reactant and solvent molecules, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 10635 (2019)

work page 2019
[14]

Nagarajan, A

K. Nagarajan, A. Thomas, and T. W. Ebbesen, Chem- istry under vibrational strong coupling, J. Am. Chem. Soc.143, 16877 (2021)

work page 2021
[15]

A. Sau, K. Nagarajan, B. Patrahau, L. Lethuillier-Karl, R. M. A. Vergauwe, A. Thomas, J. Moran, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen, Modifying woodward–hoffmann stere- oselectivity under vibrational strong coupling, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.60, 5712 (2021)

work page 2021
[16]

Hirai, H

K. Hirai, H. Ishikawa, T. Chervy, J. A. Hutchison, and H. Uji-i, Selective crystallization via vibrational strong coupling, Chemical Science12, 11986 (2021)

work page 2021
[17]

Hirai and H

K. Hirai and H. Uji-I, Polariton chemistry in cavity vac- uum fields, Chem. Lett.50, 727 (2021)

work page 2021
[18]

Satapathy, M

S. Satapathy, M. Khatoniar, D. K. Parappuram, B. Liu, G. John, J. Feist, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and V. M. Menon, Selective isomer emission via funneling of exciton polari- tons, Sci. Adv.7, eabj0997 (2021)

work page 2021
[19]

W. M. Takele, F. Wackenhut, Q. Liu, L. Piatkowski, J. Waluk, and A. J. Meixner, Tailoring Tautomerization of Single Phthalocyanine Molecules through Modification of Chromophore Photophysics by the Purcell Effect of an Optical Microcavity, J. Phys. Chem. C125, 14932 (2021)

work page 2021
[20]

G. D. Wiesehan and W. Xiong, Negligible rate enhance- ment from reported cooperative vibrational strong cou- pling catalysis, J. Chem. Phys.155, 241103 (2021)

work page 2021
[21]

M. V. Imperatore, J. B. Asbury, and N. C. Giebink, Re- producibility of cavity-enhanced chemical reaction rates in the vibrational strong coupling regime, J. Chem. Phys. 154, 191103 (2021)

work page 2021
[22]

Lather, A

J. Lather, A. N. K. Thabassum, J. Singh, and J. George, Cavity catalysis: modifying linear free-energy relation- ship under cooperative vibrational strong coupling, Chem Sci13, 195 (2022)

work page 2022
[23]

Bayer, M

A. Bayer, M. Pozimski, S. Schambeck, D. Schuh, R. Hu- ber, D. Bougeard, and C. Lange, Terahertz light–matter interaction beyond unity coupling strength, Nano Lett. 17, 6340 (2017)

work page 2017
[24]

Yoshihara, T

F. Yoshihara, T. Fuse, S. Ashhab, K. Kakuyanagi, S. Saito, and K. Semba, Superconducting qubit–oscillator circuit beyond the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nat. Phys.13, 44 (2016)

work page 2016
[25]

N. S. Mueller, Y. Okamura, B. G. M. Vieira, S. Juer- gensen, H. Lange, E. B. Barros, F. Schulz, and S. Reich, Deep strong light–matter coupling in plasmonic nanopar- ticle crystals, Nature583, 780 (2020)

work page 2020
[26]

Schlawin, D

F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Cavity quantum materials, Appl. Phys. Rev.9, 011312 (2022)

work page 2022
[27]

B. X. K. Chng, W. Ying, Y. Lai, A. N. Vamivakas, S. T. Cundiff, T. Krauss, and P. Huo, Mechanism of polariton decoherence in the collective light-matter couplings regime, ChemRxiv 10.26434/chemrxiv-2024- w70hr (2024)

work page doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024- 2024
[28]

Brumer and M

P. Brumer and M. Shapiro, Control of unimolecular re- actions using coherent light, Chem. Phys. Lett.126, 541 (1986)

work page 1986
[29]

Shapiro, Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (Wiley-VCH, 2012) p

M. Shapiro, Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (Wiley-VCH, 2012) p. 544

work page 2012
[30]

Feist, J

J. Feist, J. Galego, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, Polaritonic chemistry with organic molecules, ACS Photonics5, 205 (2018)

work page 2018
[31]

Mandal, D

A. Mandal, D. Xu, A. Mahajan, J. Lee, M. Delor, and D. R. Reichman, Microscopic theory of multimode po- lariton dispersion in multilayered materials, Nano Letters 23, 4082 (2023)

work page 2023
[32]

Lerario, A

G. Lerario, A. Fieramosca, F. Barachati, D. Ballarini, K. S. Daskalakis, L. Dominici, M. De Giorgi, S. A. Maier, G. Gigli, S. K´ ena-Cohen, and D. Sanvitto, Room- temperature superfluidity in a polariton condensate, Na- ture Physics13, 837 (2017)

work page 2017
[33]

D. Xu, A. Mandal, J. M. Baxter, S.-W. Cheng, I. Lee, H. Su, S. Liu, D. R. Reichman, and M. Delor, Ul- trafast imaging of coherent polariton propagation and interactions, arXiv 10.48550/ARXIV.2205.01176 (2022), arxiv:2205.01176

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.01176 2022
[34]

D. D. Bernardis, T. Jaako, and P. Rabl, Cavity quantum electrodynamics in the nonperturbative regime, Phys. Rev. A97, 043820 (2018)

work page 2018
[35]

D. D. Bernardis, P. Pilar, T. Jaako, S. D. Liberato, and P. Rabl, Breakdown of gauge invariance in ultrastrong- coupling cavity QED, Phys. Rev. A98, 053819 (2018)

work page 2018
[36]

A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. D. Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and mat- ter, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 19 (2019)

work page 2019
[37]

Mandal, M

A. Mandal, M. A. Taylor, B. M. Weight, E. R. Koessler, X. Li, and P. Huo, Theoretical advances in polariton chemistry and molecular cavity quantum electrodynam- ics, Chem. Rev.123, 9786 (2023)

work page 2023
[38]

M. A. D. Taylor, A. Mandal, and P. Huo, Light–matter interaction hamiltonians in cavity quantum electrody- namics, Chem. Phys. Rev.6, 10.1063/5.0225932 (2025)

work page doi:10.1063/5.0225932 2025
[39]

N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid state physics (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976) p. 826

work page 1976
[40]

M. A. D. Taylor, B. M. Weight, and P. Huo, Reciprocal asymptotically decoupled hamiltonian for cavity quan- tum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. B109, 104305 (2024)

work page 2024
[41]

Cohen-Tannoudji, J

C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Photons and Atoms: Introduction to Quantum Electrodynamics (VCH PUBN, 1997)

work page 1997
[42]

D. P. Craig and T. Thirunamachandran, Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics: An Introduction to Radiation-Molecule Interactions (Dover Publications, 1998) p. 324

work page 1998
[43]

B. X. K. Chng, M. E. Mondal, W. Ying, and P. Huo, Quantum dynamics simulations of exciton polariton transport, Nano Lett.25, 1617 (2025)

work page 2025
[44]

D. Xu, A. Mandal, J. M. Baxter, S.-W. Cheng, I. Lee, H. Su, S. Liu, D. R. Reichman, and M. Delor, Ultrafast imaging of polariton propagation and interactions, Nat. Commun.14, 3881 (2023)

work page 2023
[45]

Blackham, A

L. Blackham, A. Manjalingal, S. R. Koshkaki, and A. Mandal, Microscopic theory of polaron- polariton dispersion and propagation, Nano Letters25, 15874 (2025), pMID: 41115176, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c04134. 7

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c04134 2025
[46]

S. R. Koshkaki, A. Manjalingal, L. Blackham, and A. Mandal, Exciton-polariton dynamics in multilayered materials, arXiv (2025)

work page 2025
[47]

Du, New excitons in multilayer 2d materials, Nature Reviews Physics6, 157 (2024)

L. Du, New excitons in multilayer 2d materials, Nature Reviews Physics6, 157 (2024)

work page 2024
[48]

Slobodkin, Y

Y. Slobodkin, Y. Mazuz-Harpaz, S. Refaely-Abramson, S. Gazit, H. Steinberg, and R. Rapaport, Quantum phase transitions of trilayer excitons in atomically thin heterostructures, Physical Review Letters125, 255301 (2020)

work page 2020
[49]

M. A. D. Taylor and P. Huo, Effective mode de- scription for macroscopic fabry p´ erot cavities, arXiv 10.48550/ARXIV.2504.02980 (2025)

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.02980 2025
[50]

Restoring Bloch’s Theorem for Cavity Exciton Polaron-Polaritons

C. Gustin, S. Franke, and S. Hughes, Gauge-invariant theory of truncated quantum light-matter interactions in arbitrary media, Physical Review A107, 013722 (2023). 8 Supplemental Material for “Restoring Bloch’s Theorem for Cavity Exciton Polaron-Polaritons” Exciton Model We begin our analysis by defining a 2D electronic Hamiltonian for an electron and a h...

work page 2023

[1] [1]

L. Qiu, A. Mandal, O. Morshed, M. T. Meidenbauer, W. Girten, P. Huo, A. N. Vamivakas, and T. D. Krauss, Molecular polaritons generated from strong coupling be- tween CdSe nanoplatelets and a dielectric optical cavity, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 5030 (2021)

work page 2021

[2] [2]

T. E. Li, B. Cui, J. E. Subotnik, and A. Nitzan, Molecular polaritonics: Chemical dynamics under strong light–matter coupling, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.73, 10.1146/annurev-physchem-090519-042621 (2021)

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-090519-042621 2021

[3] [3]

Schwartz, J

T. Schwartz, J. A. Hutchison, J. L´ eonard, C. Genet, S. Haacke, and T. W. Ebbesen, Polariton dynamics un- der strong light–molecule coupling, ChemPhysChem14, 125 (2013)

work page 2013

[4] [4]

Thomas, J

A. Thomas, J. George, A. Shalabney, M. Dryzhakov, S. J. Varma, J. Moran, T. Chervy, X. Zhong, E. De- vaux, C. Genet, J. A. Hutchison, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ground-state chemical reactivity under vibrational cou- pling to the vacuum electromagnetic field, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.55, 11462 (2016)

work page 2016

[5] [5]

Thomas, L

A. Thomas, L. Lethuillier-Karl, K. Nagarajan, R. M. A. Vergauwe, J. George, T. Chervy, A. Shalabney, E. De- vaux, C. Genet, J. Moran, and T. W. Ebbesen, Tilting a ground-state reactivity landscape by vibrational strong coupling, Science363, 615 (2019)

work page 2019

[6] [6]

Thomas, A

A. Thomas, A. Jayachandran, L. Lethuillier-Karl, R. M. Vergauwe, K. Nagarajan, E. Devaux, C. Genet, J. Moran, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ground state chemistry under vibra- tional strong coupling: dependence of thermodynamic parameters on the rabi splitting energy, Nanophotonics 9, 249 (2020)

work page 2020

[7] [7]

Thomas, E

A. Thomas, E. Devaux, K. Nagarajan, G. Rogez, M. Sei- del, F. Richard, C. Genet, M. Drillon, and T. W. Ebbe- sen, Large enhancement of ferromagnetism under a col- lective strong coupling of ybco nanoparticles, Nano Lett. 21, 4365 (2021)

work page 2021

[8] [8]

R. M. A. Vergauwe, A. Thomas, K. Nagarajan, A. Sha- labney, J. George, T. Chervy, M. Seidel, E. Devaux, V. Torbeev, and T. W. Ebbesen, Modification of enzyme activity by vibrational strong coupling of water, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 15324 (2019)

work page 2019

[9] [9]

T. W. Ebbesen, Hybrid light–matter states in a molecular and material science perspective, Acc. Chem. Res.49, 2403 (2016)

work page 2016

[10] [10]

F. J. Garcia-Vidal, C. Ciuti, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ma- 6 nipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields, Science373, 10.1126/science.abd0336 (2021)

work page doi:10.1126/science.abd0336 2021

[11] [11]

J. A. Hutchison, T. Schwartz, C. Genet, E. Devaux, and T. W. Ebbesen, Modifying chemical landscapes by cou- pling to vacuum fields, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.51, 1592 (2012)

work page 2012

[12] [12]

George, T

J. George, T. Chervy, A. Shalabney, E. Devaux, H. Hiura, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen, Multiple rabi splittings under ultrastrong vibrational coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 153601 (2016)

work page 2016

[13] [13]

Lather, P

J. Lather, P. Bhatt, A. Thomas, T. W. Ebbesen, and J. George, Cavity catalysis by cooperative vibra- tional strong coupling of reactant and solvent molecules, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.58, 10635 (2019)

work page 2019

[14] [14]

Nagarajan, A

K. Nagarajan, A. Thomas, and T. W. Ebbesen, Chem- istry under vibrational strong coupling, J. Am. Chem. Soc.143, 16877 (2021)

work page 2021

[15] [15]

A. Sau, K. Nagarajan, B. Patrahau, L. Lethuillier-Karl, R. M. A. Vergauwe, A. Thomas, J. Moran, C. Genet, and T. W. Ebbesen, Modifying woodward–hoffmann stere- oselectivity under vibrational strong coupling, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.60, 5712 (2021)

work page 2021

[16] [16]

Hirai, H

K. Hirai, H. Ishikawa, T. Chervy, J. A. Hutchison, and H. Uji-i, Selective crystallization via vibrational strong coupling, Chemical Science12, 11986 (2021)

work page 2021

[17] [17]

Hirai and H

K. Hirai and H. Uji-I, Polariton chemistry in cavity vac- uum fields, Chem. Lett.50, 727 (2021)

work page 2021

[18] [18]

Satapathy, M

S. Satapathy, M. Khatoniar, D. K. Parappuram, B. Liu, G. John, J. Feist, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and V. M. Menon, Selective isomer emission via funneling of exciton polari- tons, Sci. Adv.7, eabj0997 (2021)

work page 2021

[19] [19]

W. M. Takele, F. Wackenhut, Q. Liu, L. Piatkowski, J. Waluk, and A. J. Meixner, Tailoring Tautomerization of Single Phthalocyanine Molecules through Modification of Chromophore Photophysics by the Purcell Effect of an Optical Microcavity, J. Phys. Chem. C125, 14932 (2021)

work page 2021

[20] [20]

G. D. Wiesehan and W. Xiong, Negligible rate enhance- ment from reported cooperative vibrational strong cou- pling catalysis, J. Chem. Phys.155, 241103 (2021)

work page 2021

[21] [21]

M. V. Imperatore, J. B. Asbury, and N. C. Giebink, Re- producibility of cavity-enhanced chemical reaction rates in the vibrational strong coupling regime, J. Chem. Phys. 154, 191103 (2021)

work page 2021

[22] [22]

Lather, A

J. Lather, A. N. K. Thabassum, J. Singh, and J. George, Cavity catalysis: modifying linear free-energy relation- ship under cooperative vibrational strong coupling, Chem Sci13, 195 (2022)

work page 2022

[23] [23]

Bayer, M

A. Bayer, M. Pozimski, S. Schambeck, D. Schuh, R. Hu- ber, D. Bougeard, and C. Lange, Terahertz light–matter interaction beyond unity coupling strength, Nano Lett. 17, 6340 (2017)

work page 2017

[24] [24]

Yoshihara, T

F. Yoshihara, T. Fuse, S. Ashhab, K. Kakuyanagi, S. Saito, and K. Semba, Superconducting qubit–oscillator circuit beyond the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nat. Phys.13, 44 (2016)

work page 2016

[25] [25]

N. S. Mueller, Y. Okamura, B. G. M. Vieira, S. Juer- gensen, H. Lange, E. B. Barros, F. Schulz, and S. Reich, Deep strong light–matter coupling in plasmonic nanopar- ticle crystals, Nature583, 780 (2020)

work page 2020

[26] [26]

Schlawin, D

F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Cavity quantum materials, Appl. Phys. Rev.9, 011312 (2022)

work page 2022

[27] [27]

B. X. K. Chng, W. Ying, Y. Lai, A. N. Vamivakas, S. T. Cundiff, T. Krauss, and P. Huo, Mechanism of polariton decoherence in the collective light-matter couplings regime, ChemRxiv 10.26434/chemrxiv-2024- w70hr (2024)

work page doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024- 2024

[28] [28]

Brumer and M

P. Brumer and M. Shapiro, Control of unimolecular re- actions using coherent light, Chem. Phys. Lett.126, 541 (1986)

work page 1986

[29] [29]

Shapiro, Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (Wiley-VCH, 2012) p

M. Shapiro, Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (Wiley-VCH, 2012) p. 544

work page 2012

[30] [30]

Feist, J

J. Feist, J. Galego, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, Polaritonic chemistry with organic molecules, ACS Photonics5, 205 (2018)

work page 2018

[31] [31]

Mandal, D

A. Mandal, D. Xu, A. Mahajan, J. Lee, M. Delor, and D. R. Reichman, Microscopic theory of multimode po- lariton dispersion in multilayered materials, Nano Letters 23, 4082 (2023)

work page 2023

[32] [32]

Lerario, A

G. Lerario, A. Fieramosca, F. Barachati, D. Ballarini, K. S. Daskalakis, L. Dominici, M. De Giorgi, S. A. Maier, G. Gigli, S. K´ ena-Cohen, and D. Sanvitto, Room- temperature superfluidity in a polariton condensate, Na- ture Physics13, 837 (2017)

work page 2017

[33] [33]

D. Xu, A. Mandal, J. M. Baxter, S.-W. Cheng, I. Lee, H. Su, S. Liu, D. R. Reichman, and M. Delor, Ul- trafast imaging of coherent polariton propagation and interactions, arXiv 10.48550/ARXIV.2205.01176 (2022), arxiv:2205.01176

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.01176 2022

[34] [34]

D. D. Bernardis, T. Jaako, and P. Rabl, Cavity quantum electrodynamics in the nonperturbative regime, Phys. Rev. A97, 043820 (2018)

work page 2018

[35] [35]

D. D. Bernardis, P. Pilar, T. Jaako, S. D. Liberato, and P. Rabl, Breakdown of gauge invariance in ultrastrong- coupling cavity QED, Phys. Rev. A98, 053819 (2018)

work page 2018

[36] [36]

A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. D. Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and mat- ter, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 19 (2019)

work page 2019

[37] [37]

Mandal, M

A. Mandal, M. A. Taylor, B. M. Weight, E. R. Koessler, X. Li, and P. Huo, Theoretical advances in polariton chemistry and molecular cavity quantum electrodynam- ics, Chem. Rev.123, 9786 (2023)

work page 2023

[38] [38]

M. A. D. Taylor, A. Mandal, and P. Huo, Light–matter interaction hamiltonians in cavity quantum electrody- namics, Chem. Phys. Rev.6, 10.1063/5.0225932 (2025)

work page doi:10.1063/5.0225932 2025

[39] [39]

N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid state physics (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1976) p. 826

work page 1976

[40] [40]

M. A. D. Taylor, B. M. Weight, and P. Huo, Reciprocal asymptotically decoupled hamiltonian for cavity quan- tum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. B109, 104305 (2024)

work page 2024

[41] [41]

Cohen-Tannoudji, J

C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, and G. Grynberg, Photons and Atoms: Introduction to Quantum Electrodynamics (VCH PUBN, 1997)

work page 1997

[42] [42]

D. P. Craig and T. Thirunamachandran, Molecular Quantum Electrodynamics: An Introduction to Radiation-Molecule Interactions (Dover Publications, 1998) p. 324

work page 1998

[43] [43]

B. X. K. Chng, M. E. Mondal, W. Ying, and P. Huo, Quantum dynamics simulations of exciton polariton transport, Nano Lett.25, 1617 (2025)

work page 2025

[44] [44]

D. Xu, A. Mandal, J. M. Baxter, S.-W. Cheng, I. Lee, H. Su, S. Liu, D. R. Reichman, and M. Delor, Ultrafast imaging of polariton propagation and interactions, Nat. Commun.14, 3881 (2023)

work page 2023

[45] [45]

Blackham, A

L. Blackham, A. Manjalingal, S. R. Koshkaki, and A. Mandal, Microscopic theory of polaron- polariton dispersion and propagation, Nano Letters25, 15874 (2025), pMID: 41115176, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c04134. 7

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c04134 2025

[46] [46]

S. R. Koshkaki, A. Manjalingal, L. Blackham, and A. Mandal, Exciton-polariton dynamics in multilayered materials, arXiv (2025)

work page 2025

[47] [47]

Du, New excitons in multilayer 2d materials, Nature Reviews Physics6, 157 (2024)

L. Du, New excitons in multilayer 2d materials, Nature Reviews Physics6, 157 (2024)

work page 2024

[48] [48]

Slobodkin, Y

Y. Slobodkin, Y. Mazuz-Harpaz, S. Refaely-Abramson, S. Gazit, H. Steinberg, and R. Rapaport, Quantum phase transitions of trilayer excitons in atomically thin heterostructures, Physical Review Letters125, 255301 (2020)

work page 2020

[49] [49]

M. A. D. Taylor and P. Huo, Effective mode de- scription for macroscopic fabry p´ erot cavities, arXiv 10.48550/ARXIV.2504.02980 (2025)

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.02980 2025

[50] [50]

Restoring Bloch’s Theorem for Cavity Exciton Polaron-Polaritons

C. Gustin, S. Franke, and S. Hughes, Gauge-invariant theory of truncated quantum light-matter interactions in arbitrary media, Physical Review A107, 013722 (2023). 8 Supplemental Material for “Restoring Bloch’s Theorem for Cavity Exciton Polaron-Polaritons” Exciton Model We begin our analysis by defining a 2D electronic Hamiltonian for an electron and a h...

work page 2023