Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 68 references

Structural heterogeneity-induced enhancement of transverse magneto-thermoelectric conversion revealed by thermoelectric imaging in functionally graded materials

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the anomalous Ettingshausen effect—transverse charge-to-heat conversion in a magnetic material—is maximized not by full crystallization but by an intermediate state of atomic-scale heterogeneity, and that a single tem

desk verdict A promising single-sample gradient-annealing + LIT platform for transverse thermoelectric screening, but the central 'peak before crystallization' claim rests on an unmeasured temperature profile. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.03581 v1 pith:WWV2VSMA submitted 2026-01-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Sang J. Park , Ravi Gautam , Takashi Yagi , Rajkumar Modak , Hossein Sepehri-Amin , Ken-ichi Uchida This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords FunctionallygradedmaterialsAnomalousEttingshauseneffectLock-inthermographyAmorphousalloysStructuralheterogeneityTransversethermoelectricconversionCunanoclusters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The authors try to establish that subtle structural heterogeneity, not full crystallization, is what most strongly enhances the anomalous Ettingshausen effect (transverse charge-to-heat conversion) in a magnetic amorphous alloy. They do this by annealing one Fe-based ribbon under a one-dimensional temperature gradient so that each point along the ribbon represents a different annealing state, then imaging the AEE response with lock-in thermography. The AEE rises to a peak at an intermediate position, then falls; this peak sits well before crystallization sets in, and it is invisible in X-ray diffraction and in ordinary electrical and thermal transport measurements. If true, transverse thermoelectric measurements are uniquely sensitive probes of atomic-scale disorder, and a single graded sample can serve as a high-throughput platform for material optimization.

What carries the argument

The central object is a temperature-gradient-annealed ribbon that serves as a one-dimensional library of structural states, with position x standing in for annealing temperature. The probe is lock-in thermography: a square-wave current drives the sample, and the field-odd component of the lock-in amplitude (Aodd) isolates the anomalous Ettingshausen effect from Peltier and Joule contributions. Supporting decomposition of the anomalous Nernst conductivity (with an assumed Onsager relation) separates the dominant ANE-related term from the Hall-deflected Seebeck term, attributing the peak to the former.

What would settle it

Measure the true annealing-temperature profile along the ribbon (e.g., with a thin thermocouple array or temperature-sensitive phase-transition markers), or anneal discrete ribbons at a series of known temperatures and check that the AEE peak appears at the temperature inferred for x = 70–80 mm. A non-monotonic Ta(x) or a shift of the peak in the discrete series would undercut the structural assignment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the authors' own terms, annealing a melt-spun Fe79Si4B14Nb2Cu1 ribbon under a temperature gradient produces a functionally graded material whose local annealing state varies continuously along its length. Lock-in thermography maps the field-odd, current-induced temperature oscillation at every point, isolating the anomalous Ettingshausen effect. The resulting AEE amplitude profile is non-monotonic: it rises from 4.90 mK at the cold end, peaks at approximately 6.65 mK at x = 70–80 mm, and then declines, with a steep drop near the crystallization onset at x ≈ 110 mm. Structural analysis by STEM and APT finds Fe-based crystalline alloys and Cu nanoclusters (average 1.7 nm diameter) embedded

Load-bearing premise

The claim leans on the assumption that each position x along the 130-mm ribbon corresponds to a distinct, monotonically increasing annealing temperature; the actual Ta(x) profile was never measured, so the structural meaning of the peak at x = 70–80 mm rests on an inferred mapping rather than a calibrated one.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single heterogeneity-graded sample mapped by lock-in thermography can replace discrete annealing series for locating the optimum transverse thermoelectric response.
  • Transverse thermoelectric measurements can detect atomic-scale structural heterogeneity that lab-scale X-ray diffraction and longitudinal electrical/thermal transport measurements miss.
  • The AEE peak appears in the pre-crystallization (atomic-heterogeneity) regime rather than at full crystallization, pointing to cu-nanocluster-driven interfacial scattering as a design lever.
  • If the curvature is representative, the high-performing region of the ribbon retains mechanical flexibility, making it suitable for flexible transverse thermoelectric devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same FGM-plus-LIT methodology could be extended to map other transverse transport coefficients—anomalous Hall effect, spin Peltier effect—across structural gradients, turning a single sample into a continuous phase diagram.
  • Because the position-to-temperature mapping is not calibrated, a direct thermocouple measurement of the annealing-temperature profile along the ribbon would tighten the structural interpretation and could be used to assign an absolute temperature scale to every x-position.
  • If the pre-crystallization peak is a general feature of magnetic amorphous alloys, device design could deliberately target the disorder-enhanced window instead of avoiding it, preserving flexibility while maximizing conversion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a functionally graded Fe79Si4B14Nb2Cu1 amorphous ribbon produced by annealing a melt-spun ribbon under a one-dimensional temperature gradient in a tube furnace. Using lock-in thermography (LIT), the authors map the field-odd component of the lock-in amplitude (Aodd) along the ribbon and observe a non-monotonic profile that peaks at x = 70–80 mm, before the XRD crystallization onset near x = 110 mm. STEM and APT on the peak region show an amorphous matrix containing Cu nanoclusters, which the authors interpret as the source of enhanced anomalous Ettingshausen effect (AEE). They further convert Aodd to an anomalous Nernst conductivity αANE using standard transport relations and compare three representative positions (TL, TM, TH). The central claim is that transverse thermoelectric conversion is exceptionally sensitive to subtle structural heterogeneity and that the FGM+LIT approach is a high-throughput route to optimize such materials.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the work is significant: it demonstrates that a single gradient-annealed ribbon, combined with LIT imaging, can replace discrete annealing-series studies for transverse thermoelectric materials, and it identifies AEE as a sensitive probe of sub-crystallization structural heterogeneity. The experimental protocol has clear strengths: Joule heating is separated by zero-offset square-wave current, the AEE is isolated by ±H odd-field symmetrization (Eqs. 2-1 and 2-2), and uniform magnetization is verified through the constant field-odd phase. The imaging provides a large statistical dataset. However, the quantitative translation from Aodd to αANE contains an internal inconsistency, and the x-to-annealing-temperature mapping underlying the phrase 'well before crystallization' is not calibrated. These issues must be resolved before the claims as stated can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.5, Eqs. (3)–(7), Fig. 5] There is an internal inconsistency between Aodd and the reported αANE. Under R > 25 (Eq. (7)), αANE ≈ σxx ΠAEE/T, and ΠAEE ∝ κ ΔT_AEE/(j_c t) with ΔT_AEE = 2Aodd. From TM (x = 80) to TH (x = 125), σxx increases by ~1.85×, κ (from D) increases by at most ~1.3–1.7×, while ΔT_AEE drops from ~13.3 mK to ~4.6 mK. The product therefore decreases, yet Fig. 5(c) reports αANE increasing monotonically from 1.83 to 2.39 A/mK. Please provide the full numerical table for κ, σxx, σAHE, Sxx, ΠAEE, and both terms of Eq. (6) at TL, TM, and TH. If αANE actually peaks at TH, then the abstract’s 'maximum AEE before crystallization' applies only to the raw temperature modulation and not to the fundamental transport coefficient; the manuscript must state this distinction explicitly.
  2. [§2.1, Methods; Fig. 1; Fig. 3] The x→annealing-temperature mapping is not measured. Methods states that heat transfer and the resulting temperature gradient were 'assumed to be one-dimensional,' and §2.1 concedes the gradient 'may not be strictly linear.' No thermocouple profile along the ribbon is reported. The claims that the Aodd peak at x = 70–80 mm corresponds to a particular annealing temperature 'well before crystallization' depend on this uncalibrated mapping. XRD, STEM, and APT anchor the structural state at x = 5, 80, and 125 mm, which supports a structural gradient, but they do not establish the continuous temperature axis. Please either measure Ta(x) along the ribbon or rephrase the interpretation in terms of the directly observed structural states, and quantify how the uncertainty in Ta(x) affects the inferred optimum annealing temperature.
  3. [Eq. (3), Methods] The thermal conductivity κ entering Eq. (3) is not independently reported or defined. The manuscript measures thermal diffusivity D, but Eq. (3) requires κ. If κ is obtained via κ = ρCpD, the density and specific heat values used must be given; if κ is estimated from previous work, this is an unstated free parameter in the central αANE and R analysis. The αANE values in Fig. 5 and the claim R > 25 are therefore not fully determined by the reported measurements. Please list κ at TL, TM, and TH with provenance and uncertainty.
  4. [§2.4, Fig. 4; Abstract] The mechanistic attribution to Cu nanoclusters is based on a single APT volume at x = 80 mm. No comparative APT or cluster statistics are shown for TL (x = 5 mm) and TH (x = 125 mm), so the claim that the AEE enhancement in TM is 'associated with the mechanisms of Cu nanoclusters,' and the abstract’s statement that the heterogeneity 'accounts for the enhanced response,' go beyond the data presented. Please provide APT results from TL and TH (or at least Cu cluster number density and size distributions across the three regimes), or explicitly frame the Cu-cluster mechanism as inferred from prior discrete-sample studies rather than established in this FGM sample.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 1] The legend refers to 'input charge current C', while the text and equations use j_c or I. Please unify notation.
  2. [Eq. (1)] The symbol l in dφ_lag/d_l is not defined in the main text; clarify that it is the distance from the thermal excitation center and specify the fitting range used for the slope.
  3. [References [41], [42]] References [41] and [42] are listed as 'accepted' without DOIs. If they are public, provide DOIs; if not, this hampers verification of the comparison with previous discrete-sample results.
  4. [§2.6, Fig. S4] The flexibility test is qualitative. Please state the bending radius at which the intact (x < 110 mm) region survives and clarify that the fracture occurred during handling/detachment rather than during bending.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all quantitative inputs are independently measured and no equation reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central result is a direct spatially resolved measurement of the field-odd lock-in amplitude Aodd (Eqs. 2-1 and 2-2) along a single FGM ribbon. The AEE peak at x = 70-80 mm is an observed profile, not a fitted output. Eqs. (3)-(7) are standard transport relations applied to independently measured quantities (Pi_AEE, sigma_xx, sigma_AHE, S_xx); no parameter is tuned to reproduce Aodd. The interpretation that Cu nanoclusters produce enhanced skew scattering draws on prior work by the same group (Refs. 40, 42, 43), but the present paper adds new APT evidence at x = 80 mm and correlates it with the measured Aodd profile, so the self-citation is not load-bearing. The only notable weakness is empirical rather than circular: the annealing-temperature profile Ta(x) is assumed one-dimensional and 'may not be strictly linear' (Sec. 2.1; Methods), so assigning the x = 70-80 mm peak to a pre-crystallization thermal regime relies on an unmeasured mapping. That is a calibration/risk issue, not a derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted model parameters appear: all transport coefficients (Aodd, σ, D, σAHE, Sxx) are measured. The central claim rests instead on interpretive assumptions: an unmeasured, assumed-monotonic annealing-temperature profile Ta(x); the LIT signal-separation conventions; the standard Onsager-based decomposition of αANE; an unspecified thermal-conductivity input to Eq. (3); and a mechanistic attribution (Cu-nanocluster Rashba-like SOC) inherited from the authors' own refs. [40,42]. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated; the Cu nanoclusters are measured objects, not invented entities.

free parameters (1)
  • Thermal conductivity κ entering Eq. (3) = unspecified
    ΠAEE and αANE scale linearly with κ. The paper measures thermal diffusivity D position-dependently but never states whether κ is taken as ρ·Cp·D per position or as a single composition-matched value from refs. [40,42]; the reported αANE(TH) = 2.39 A/mK is sensitive to this choice (§2.5, Eq. (3), Fig. 5c).
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The annealing temperature varies monotonically along x with negligible lateral variation.
    Methods ('assumed to be one-dimensional'); §2.1 admits the gradient may not be strictly linear. Every x-position is treated as a distinct annealing-temperature state.
  • domain assumption The field-odd component of the lock-in signal isolates the AEE; even-in-H contributions cancel (Eqs. 2-1, 2-2).
    Standard LIT methodology inherited from refs. [24,26,27,61–63].
  • domain assumption Eq. (1) is valid for extracting D (instantaneous through-thickness diffusion, radial in-plane flow).
    §2.2 and Methods; justified for 20 µm thickness.
  • standard math Onsager reciprocity ΠAEE = T·SANE and the αANE decomposition (Eqs. 3–6).
    Standard linear-response relations for anomalous transverse thermoelectricity.
  • domain assumption Ordinary Nernst and Ettingshausen contributions are negligible.
    §2.5; the only supporting citation (ref. [41]) is the authors' own accepted paper.
  • domain assumption Uniform magnetization along y at ±0.3 T across the entire ribbon.
    §2.3; coercivity values are cited from refs. [40,42]; constant φodd is the in-paper evidence.
  • domain assumption Cu-nanocluster-induced Rashba-like SOC and asymmetric skew scattering cause the TM enhancement.
    §2.4–2.5; hypothesis from refs. [40,42], not derived here.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Structural heterogeneity-induced enhancement of transverse magneto-thermoelectric conversion revealed by thermoelectric imaging in functionally graded materials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WWV2VSMA

@misc{pith2026260103581,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Structural heterogeneity-induced enhancement of transverse magneto-thermoelectric conversion revealed by thermoelectric imaging in functionally graded materials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WWV2VSMA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.03581}
}
read the original abstract

Functionally graded materials (FGMs) exhibit continuous property variations that enable unique functionalities and provide efficient platforms for systematic property optimization. Here, we report the fabrication of FGMs with graded structural heterogeneity by annealing an amorphous metal under a one-dimensional temperature gradient. Using lock-in thermography (LIT), we spatially mapped transverse thermoelectric conversion with high spatial and temperature resolution. A pronounced non-monotonic response was observed, with the maximum anomalous Ettingshausen effect, transverse charge-to-heat conversion in magnetic materials, appearing in the atomic-heterogeneity regime well before crystallization. This enhancement was not captured by conventional structural or longitudinal transport measurements, highlighting the exceptional sensitivity of transverse thermoelectric phenomena to subtle structural heterogeneity. Structural analyses using scanning transmission electron microscopy and atom probe tomography revealed Fe-based crystalline alloys and Cu nanoclusters embedded in the amorphous matrix, whose heterogeneity accounts for the enhanced response. These findings establish temperature-gradient-annealed FGMs, combined with LIT, as a powerful methodology for probing structural-heterogeneity-driven transverse electron transport and designing high-performance flexible materials.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Koizumi, FGM activities in Japan, Composites Part B 28B (1997) 1–4

    M. Koizumi, FGM activities in Japan, Composites Part B 28B (1997) 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359- 8368(96)00016-9

    doi:10.1016/s1359- 1997

  2. [2]

    Naebe, K

    M. Naebe, K. Shirvanimoghaddam, Functionally graded materials: A review of fabrication and properties, Appl Mater Today 5 (2016) 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2016.10.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2016.10.001 2016

  3. [3]

    Y . Li, Z. Feng, L. Hao, L. Huang, C. Xin, Y . Wang, E. Bilotti, K. Essa, H. Zhang, Z. Li, F. Y an, T. Peijs, A Review on Functionally Graded Materials and Structures via Additive Manufacturing: From Multi - Scale Design to Versatile Functional Properties, Adv Mater Technol 5 (2020) 1900981. https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201900981

    work page doi:10.1002/admt.201900981 2020

  4. [4]

    Zhang, F

    C. Zhang, F. Chen, Z. Huang, M. Jia, G. Chen, Y . Ye, Y . Lin, W. Liu, B. Chen, Q. Shen, L. Zhang, E.J. Lavernia, Additive manufacturing of functionally graded materials: A review, Mater Sci Eng: A 764 (2019) 138209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.138209

    arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    D.K. Jha, T. Kant, R.K. Singh, A critical review of recent research on functionally graded plates, Compos Struct 96 (2013) 833–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.001 2013

  6. [6]

    Cannillo, L

    V . Cannillo, L. Lusvarghi, C. Siligardi, A. Sola, Prediction of the elastic properties profile in glass-alumina functionally graded materials, J Eur Ceram Soc 27 (2007) 2393 –2400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.09.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.09.009 2007

  7. [7]

    Hedegaard, A.A.H

    E.M.J. Hedegaard, A.A.H. Mamakhel, H. Reardon, B.B. Iversen, Functionally Graded (PbTe)1-x(SnTe)x Thermoelectrics, Chem Mater 30 (2018) 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04473

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04473 2018

  8. [8]

    W. Niu, X. Cao, Y . Hu, F. Wang, J. Shi, Analytical analysis of temperature -dependent thermoelectric generator and optimization based on functionally graded materials, Int J Energy Res 46 (2022) 23963 – 23972. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.8693

    work page doi:10.1002/er.8693 2022

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    H. Han, S. Eun Y ang, J. Lee, K. Kim, C. Nam, S. Jo, S.H. Lee, J.Y . Kim, S. Ahn, J. Sung Son, 3D-Printed functionally graded thermoelectric materials for enhanced power generation, Chem Eng J 497 (2024) 154547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.154547

    2024

  2. [10]

    Kumar, K.V .V .S

    S. Kumar, K.V .V .S. Murthy Reddy, A. Kumar, G. Rohini Devi, Development and characterization of polymer-ceramic continuous fiber reinforced functionally graded composites for aerospace application, Aerosp Sci Technol 26 (2013) 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2012.04.002

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    Y . Wang, A. Sakai, S. Minami, H. Gu, T. Chen, Z. Feng, D. Nishio-Hamane, S. Nakatsuji, Robust giant anomalous Nernst effect in polycrystalline nodal web ferromagnets, Appl Phys Lett 125 (2024) 081901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0219416

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    Z. Feng, S. Minami, S. Akamatsu, A. Sakai, T. Chen, D. Nishio-Hamane, S. Nakatsuji, Giant and Robust Anomalous Nernst Effect in a Polycrystalline Topological Ferromagnet at Room Temperature, Adv Funct Mater 32 (2022) 2206519. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202206519

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    S.J. Park, P . Cao V an, M.-G. Kang, H.-J. Jung, G.-Y . Kim, S.-Y . Choi, J.-W. Yoo, B.-G. Park, S.K. Kim, J.-R. Jeong, H. Jin, Enhancing spin pumping by nonlocal manipulation of magnon temperature, Matter 7 (2024) 4332–4341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2024.08.023

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    Kim, S.J

    M.Y . Kim, S.J. Park, G.Y . Kim, S.Y . Choi, H. Jin, Designing efficient spin Seebeck-based thermoelectric devices via simultaneous optimization of bulk and interface properties, Energy Environ Sci 14 (2021) 3480–3491. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ee00667c

    2021 doi

  7. [15]

    M.Y . Kim, D. Lee, J.H. Lee, D. Lee, G.Y . Kim, S.Y . Choi, J.P . Heremans, H. Jin, Oxygen V acancy Defect 29 Engineering for Transverse Thermoelectric Enhancement: a Novel Extrinsic Pathway beyond Intrinsic Approaches, Adv Sci 12 (2025) 2502892. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202502892

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    Hirayama, R

    Y . Hirayama, R. Iguchi, X.F. Miao, K. Hono, K. Uchida, High -throughput direct measurement of magnetocaloric effect based on lock -in thermography technique, Appl Phys Lett 111 (2017) 163901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5000970

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    Nakajima, T

    H. Nakajima, T. Morimoto, Y . Okigawa, T. Yamada, Y . Ikuta, K. Kawahara, H. Ago, T. Okazaki, Imaging of local structures affecting electrical transport properties of large graphene sheets by lock -in thermography, Sci Adv 5 (2019) eaau3407. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1126/sciadv.aau3407

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    K.M. Bang, W. Park, P . Ziolkowski, H. Jin, Fabrication and Cooling Performance Optimization of Stretchable Thermoelectric Cooling Device, ACS Appl Electron Mater 3 (2021) 5433 –5442. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.1c00886

    2021 doi

  11. [19]

    Park, K.M

    S.J. Park, K.M. Bang, B. Kim, P . Ziolkowski, J.R. Jeong, H. Jin, Adaptive thermoelectric cooling system for Energy -Efficient local and transient heat management, Appl Therm Eng 216 (2022) 119060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119060

    2022

  12. [20]

    S.J. Park, J. Park, K.M. Bang, J.M. Lee, W. Park, P . Ziolkowski, H. Jin, Thermoelectric hotspot cooling using thermally conductive fillers, Appl Therm Eng 232 (2023) 120994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120994

    2023

  13. [21]

    Alasli, A

    A. Alasli, A. Miura, R. Iguchi, H. Nagano, K. Uchida, High -throughput imaging measurements of thermoelectric figure of merit, Sci Technol Adv Mater: Methods 1 (2021) 162 –168. https://doi.org/10.1080/27660400.2021.1963642

    2021

  14. [22]

    Straube, J.M

    H. Straube, J.M. Wagner, O. Breitenstein, Measurement of the Peltier coefficient of semiconductors by lock-in thermography, Appl Phys Lett 95 (2009) 052107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3194156

    2009 doi

  15. [23]

    Modak, T

    R. Modak, T. Hirai, Y . Sakuraba, S. Mitani, K. Oyanagi, T. Yamazaki, T. Seki, K. Uchida, High‐ Throughput Optimization of Magnetoresistance Materials Based on Lock‐In Thermography, Adv Phys Res 3 (2024) 2400021. https://doi.org/10.1002/apxr.202400021

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Uchida, M

    K. Uchida, M. Sasaki, Y . Sakuraba, R. Iguchi, S. Daimon, E. Saitoh, M. Goto, Combinatorial investigation of spin-orbit materials using spin Peltier effect, Sci Rep 8 (2018) 16067. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 018-34493-6

    2018 doi

  17. [25]

    Modak, K

    R. Modak, K. Goto, S. Ueda, Y . Miura, K. Uchida, Y . Sakuraba, Combinatorial tuning of electronic structure and thermoelectric properties in Co2MnAl1-xSixWeyl semimetals, APL Mater 9 (2021) 031105. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041100

    2021 doi

  18. [26]

    Daimon, R

    S. Daimon, R. Iguchi, T. Hioki, E. Saitoh, K. Uchida, Thermal imaging of spin Peltier effect, Nat Commun 7 (2016) 13754. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13754

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    T. Seki, R. Iguchi, K. Takanashi, K. Uchida, Relationship between anomalous Ettingshausen effect and anomalous Nernst effect in an FePt thin film, J Phys D Appl Phys 51 (2018) 254001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aac481

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    Uchida, S

    K. Uchida, S. Daimon, R. Iguchi, E. Saitoh, Observation of anisotropic magneto-Peltier effect in nickel, Nature 558 (2018) 95–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0143-x

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    Mizuguchi, S

    M. Mizuguchi, S. Nakatsuji, Energy -harvesting materials based on the anomalous Nernst effect, Sci Technol Adv Mater 20 (2019) 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2019.1585143

    2019

  22. [30]

    Sakai, S

    A. Sakai, S. Minami, T. Koretsune, T. Chen, T. Higo, Y . Wang, T. Nomoto, M. Hirayama, S. Miwa, D. Nishio-Hamane, F. Ishii, R. Arita, S. Nakatsuji, Iron -based binary ferromagnets for transverse thermoelectric conversion, Nature 581 (2020) 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586...

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    Y . Pan, C. Le, B. He, S.J. Watzman, M. Y ao, J. Gooth, J.P . Heremans, Y . Sun, C. Felser, Giant anomalous Nernst signal in the antiferromagnet YbMnBi2, Nat Mater 21 (2022) 203 –209. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-01149-2

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    Masuda, R

    H. Masuda, R. Modak, T. Seki, K. Uchida, Y .C. Lau, Y . Sakuraba, R. Iguchi, K. Takanashi, Large spin- Hall effect in non-equilibrium binary copper alloys beyond the solubility limit, Commun Mater 1 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Modak, Y

    R. Modak, Y . Sakuraba, T. Hirai, T. Yagi, H. Sepehri-Amin, W. Zhou, H. Masuda, T. Seki, K. Takanashi, T. Ohkubo, K. Uchida, Sm -Co-based amorphous alloy films for zero -field operation of transverse thermoelectric generation, Sci Technol Adv Mater 23 (2022) 767–782. https://d...

    2022

  26. [34]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A.H. MacDonald, N.P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev Mod Phys 82 (2010) 1539–1592. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1539

    2010 doi

  27. [35]

    Sinova, S.O

    J. Sinova, S.O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C.H. Back, T. Jungwirth, Spin Hall effects, Rev Mod Phys 87 (2015) 1213–1260. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1213

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    L. Xu, X. Li, L. Ding, T. Chen, A. Sakai, B. Fauqué, S. Nakatsuji, Z. Zhu, K. Behnia, Anomalous transverse response of Co2MnGa and universality of the room -temperature αijA / σijA ratio across topological magnets, Phys Rev B 101 (2020) 180404(R). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysR...

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    L. Ding, J. Koo, L. Xu, X. Li, X. Lu, L. Zhao, Q. Wang, Q. Yin, H. Lei, B. Y an, Z. Zhu, K. Behnia, Intrinsic Anomalous Nernst Effect Amplified by Disorder in a Half-Metallic Semimetal, Phys Rev X 91 (2019) 041061. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041061

    2019 doi

  30. [38]

    Y . Tian, L. Y e, X. Jin, Proper scaling of the anomalous Hall effect, Phys Rev Lett 103 (2009) 087206. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.087206

    2009 doi

  31. [39]

    D. Hou, G. Su, Y . Tian, X. Jin, S.A. Yang, Q. Niu, Multivariable scaling for the anomalous Hall effect, Phys Rev Lett 114 (2015) 217203. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.217203

    2015 doi

  32. [40]

    Gautam, T

    R. Gautam, T. Hirai, A. Alasli, H. Nagano, T. Ohkubo, K. Uchida, H. Sepehri-Amin, Creation of flexible spin-caloritronic material with giant transverse thermoelectric conversion by nanostructure engineering, Nat Commun 15 (2024) 2184. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46475-6

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    S.J. Park, H. Lee, J.M. Lee, J. Ha, H. -W. Lee, H. Jin, Electron transverse transport enhancement by composite formation, Phys Rev Lett (accepted). https://doi.org/10.1103/g18j-1h8w

    doi

  34. [42]

    S.J. Park, R. Gautam, A. Alasli, T. Hirai, F. Ando, H. Nagano, H. Sepehri -Amin, K. Uchida, High - throughput development of flexible amorphous materials showing large anomalous Nernst effect via automatic annealing and thermoelectric imaging, Mater Today (accepted)

  35. [43]

    S.J. Park, R. Modak, R. Gautam, A. Alasli, T. Hirai, F. Ando, H. Nagano, H. Sepehri-Amin, K. Uchida, Designing flexible hard magnetic materials for zero -magnetic-field operation of the anomalous Nernst effect, Acta Materilia 301 (2025) 121422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/...

    2025

  36. [44]

    Park, K.M

    S.J. Park, K.M. Bang, J. Park, H. Jin, High heat -flux sensitivity of the planar coil device based on the anomalous Nernst effect, Appl Therm Eng 265 (2025) 125555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.125555

    2025

  37. [45]

    Correa, A

    M.A. Correa, A. Ferreira, A.L.R. Souza, J.M. Dantas Neto, F. Bohn, F. V az, G. V . Kurlyandskaya, Anomalous Nernst Effect in Flexible Co -Based Amorphous Ribbons, Sensors 23 (2023) 1420. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031420

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    Asaba, V

    T. Asaba, V . Ivanov, S.M. Thomas, S.Y . Savrasov, J.D. Thompson, E.D. Bauer, F. Ronning, Colossal anomalous Nernst effect in a correlated noncentrosymmetric kagome ferromagnet, Sci. Adv 7 (2021) 31 eabf1467. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf1467

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    Ikhlas, T

    M. Ikhlas, T. Tomita, T. Koretsune, M.T. Suzuki, D. Nishio -Hamane, R. Arita, Y . Otani, S. Nakatsuji, Large anomalous Nernst effect at room temperature in a chiral antiferromagnet, Nat Phys 13 (2017) 1085–

    2017

  40. [48]

    M. Li, H. Pi, Y . Zhao, T. Lin, Q. Zhang, X. Hu, C. Xiong, Z. Qiu, L. Wang, Y . Zhang, J. Cai, W. Liu, J. Sun, F. Hu, L. Gu, H. Weng, Q. Wu, S. Wang, Y . Chen, B. Shen, Large Anomalous Nernst Effects at Room Temperature in Fe3Pt Thin Films, Adv Mater 35 (202 3) 2301339. https:...

    doi

  41. [49]

    B. He, C. Şahin, S.R. Boona, B.C. Sales, Y . Pan, C. Felser, M.E. Flatté, J.P. Heremans, Large magnon- induced anomalous Nernst conductivity in single -crystal MnBi, Joule 5 (2021) 3057 –3067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.08.007

    2021 doi

  42. [50]

    Sakai, Y .P

    A. Sakai, Y .P . Mizuta, A.A. Nugroho, R. Sihombing, T. Koretsune, M.T. Suzuki, N. Takemori, R. Ishii, D. Nishio-Hamane, R. Arita, P . Goswami, S. Nakatsuji, Giant anomalous Nernst effect and quantum-critical scaling in a ferromagnetic semimetal, Nat Phys 14 (2018) 1119–1124. ...

    2018 doi

  43. [51]

    S.N. Guin, K. Manna, J. Noky, S.J. Watzman, C. Fu, N. Kumar, W. Schnelle, C. Shekhar, Y . Sun, J. Gooth, C. Felser, Anomalous Nernst effect beyond the magnetization scaling relation in the ferromagnetic Heusler compound Co2MnGa, NPG Asia Mater 11 (2019) 16. https://doi.org/10....

    2019 doi

  44. [52]

    T. Chen, S. Minami, A. Sakai, Y . Wang, Z. Feng, T. Nomoto, M. Hirayama, R. Ishii, T. Koretsune, R. Arita, S. Nakatsuji, Large anomalous Nernst effect and nodal plane in an iron-based kagome ferromagnet, Sci. Adv 8 (2022) eabk1480. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/sciad...

    2022 doi

  45. [53]

    Mende, J

    F. Mende, J. Noky, S.N. Guin, G.H. Fecher, K. Manna, P . Adler, W. Schnelle, Y . Sun, C. Fu, C. Felser, Large Anomalous Hall and Nernst Effects in High Curie -Temperature Iron-Based Heusler Compounds, Adv Sci 8 (2021) 2100782. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202100782

    2021 doi

  46. [54]

    Adachi, F

    H. Adachi, F. Ando, T. Hirai, R. Modak, M. Grayson, K. Uchida, Fundamentals and advances in transverse thermoelectrics, Appl Phys Express 18 (2025) 090101. https://doi.org/10.35848/1882-0786/adf700

    2025 doi

  47. [55]

    W. Zhou, Y . Sakuraba, Heat flux sensing by anomalous Nernst effect in Fe-Al thin films on a flexible substrate, Appl Phys Express 13 (2020) 043001. https://doi.org/10.35848/1882-0786/ab79fe

    2020 doi

  48. [56]

    Sakuraba, Potential of thermoelectric power generation using anomalous Nernst effect in magnetic materials, Scr Mater 111 (2016) 29–32

    Y . Sakuraba, Potential of thermoelectric power generation using anomalous Nernst effect in magnetic materials, Scr Mater 111 (2016) 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.04.034

    2016 doi

  49. [57]

    Tanaka, T

    H. Tanaka, T. Higo, R. Uesugi, K. Y amagata, Y . Nakanishi, H. Machinaga, S. Nakatsuji, Roll-to-Roll Printing of Anomalous Nernst Thermopile for Direct Sensing of Perpendicular Heat Flux, Adv Mater 35 (2023) 2303416. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202303416

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    Y u, S.J

    H. Y u, S.J. Park, I. Lee, J.H. Shim, H. Jin, Sign-reversed anomalous nernst effect with matched Seebeck coefficient in lanthanide-iron alloys for the direct sensing of heat flux, Sci Technol Adv Mater (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2025.2544649

    2025

  51. [59]

    R. Abe, Y . Sekimoto, S. Saini, K. Miyazaki, Q. Li, D. Li, K. Takahashi, T. Yagi, M. Nakamura, Round Robin Study on the Thermal Conductivity/Diffusivity of a Gold Wire with a Diameter of 30 μm Tested via Five Measurement Methods, J Therm Sci 31 (2022) 1037–1051. https://doi.or...

    2022 doi

  52. [60]

    W.X. Zhou, Y . Cheng, K.Q. Chen, G. Xie, T. Wang, G. Zhang, Thermal Conductivity of Amorphous Materials, Adv Funct Mater 30 (2020) 1903829. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201903829. 32

    2020 doi

  53. [61]

    Miura, H

    A. Miura, H. Sepehri -Amin, K. Masuda, H. Tsuchiura, Y . Miura, R. Iguchi, Y . Sakuraba, J. Shiomi, K. Hono, K. Uchida, Observation of anomalous Ettingshausen effect and large transverse thermoelectric conductivity in permanent magnets, Appl Phys Lett 115 (2 019) 222403. https...

    doi

  54. [62]

    Miura, K

    A. Miura, K. Masuda, T. Hirai, R. Iguchi, T. Seki, Y . Miura, H. Tsuchiura, K. Takanashi, K. Uchida, High- temperature dependence of anomalous Ettingshausen effect in SmCo5 -type permanent magnets, Appl Phys Lett 117 (2020) 082408. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023111

    2020 doi

  55. [63]

    Miura, R

    A. Miura, R. Iguchi, T. Seki, K. Takanashi, K. Uchida, Spin-mediated charge-to-heat current conversion phenomena in ferromagnetic binary alloys, Phys Rev Mater 4 (2020) 034409. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.034409

    2020 doi

  56. [64]

    Watzman, R.A

    S.J. Watzman, R.A. Duine, Y . Tserkovnyak, S.R. Boona, H. Jin, A. Prakash, Y . Zheng, J.P . Heremans, Magnon-drag thermopower and Nernst coefficient in Fe, Co, and Ni, Phys Rev B 94 (2016) 144407. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.144407

    2016 doi

  57. [65]

    Y ang, E.A

    Z. Y ang, E.A. Codecido, J. Marquez, Y . Zheng, J.P . Heremans, R.C. Myers, Scalable Nernst thermoelectric power using a coiled galfenol wire, AIP Adv 7 (2017) 095017. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5003611

    2017 doi

  58. [66]

    Uchida, T

    K. Uchida, T. Kuwabara, T. Tanji, M. Fujimoto, R. Nagasawa, R. Iguchi, Anomalous Nernst thermoelectric generation in multilayer-laminated coiled magnetic wires, Appl Phys Express 16 (2023) 093001. https://doi.org/10.35848/1882-0786/acf645. 33 Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of t...

    2023 doi

  59. [75]

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-020-00076-0

    doi

  60. [1090]

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4181

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.