Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 124 references

This paper claims that trustworthy industrial AI requires a single closed-loop governance fabric spanning data, services, and knowledge, and introduces TRISK as that unified framework.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 11:57 UTC pith:G34LBZLM

load-bearing objection Useful survey and taxonomy with a clearly labeled placeholder formalization — the TRISK framing is worth citing, but don't accept the paper's 'formalizes' claim at face value. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2601.04569 v2 pith:G34LBZLM submitted 2026-01-08 cs.CE

Industrial Data-Service-Knowledge Governance: Toward Integrated and Trusted Intelligence

Hailiang Zhao , Ziqi Wang , Daojiang Hu , Mingyi Liu , Jiahui Zhai , Kai Di , Xinkui Zhao , Zhongjie Wang
show 4 more authors
Jianwei Yin Albert Zomaya MengChu Zhou Shuiguang Deng
This is my paper
classification cs.CE
keywords TRISKindustrial governancetrustworthinessdata-service-knowledgefive-dimensional trust modelIndustry 5.0trust propagationclosed-loop governance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that trust in industrial AI systems fails not because any single component is unreliable, but because data governance, service orchestration, and knowledge-based reasoning have evolved as three disconnected tracks. It proposes TRISK, a conceptual framework that treats trust as a single property spanning all three layers, built from five dimensions: quality, security, privacy, fairness, and explainability. The central claim is that trust must be propagated upward (validated data to reliable services to confident knowledge) and fed back downward (knowledge contradictions refine data trust and service policies), creating a closed loop. A sympathetic reader would care because current standards and surveys cover only one layer or a subset of trust dimensions, leaving cross-layer failures invisible.

Core claim

TRISK is presented as the first unified, cross-layer examination of industrial governance through five interdependent trust dimensions: quality, security, privacy, fairness, and explainability. The paper's central claim is that trust in an industrial system is not a property of any single layer: validated data enable reliable service execution, service outcomes shape knowledge confidence, and knowledge contradictions feed back to refine data trust and service policies. The framework classifies more than 120 representative works along governance scope, architectural paradigm, and enabling technology, identifies gaps in semantic interoperability, runtime policy enforcement, and operational/inf

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the TRISK architecture and its formal skeleton: each governance layer (data, service, knowledge) carries a trust state Ti(t) in [0,1] that aggregates the five trust dimensions through a layer-specific map gi; an enterprise-level function F composes these layer states into overall trust; and feedback maps Bi update each layer from auditable evidence such as data lineage, SLA compliance, and model validation reports. The paper explicitly calls this formalism 'intentionally succinct and indicative,' so the equations serve as a structural placeholder rather than a derived model.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the five trust dimensions can be compressed into a single scalar trust state per layer and then combined across layers without losing decision-relevant information; if that compression fails, the trust-loop formalism cannot carry the argument.

What would settle it

In a plant or simulator running TRISK, inject a stale or mislabeled sensor reading and watch whether service execution changes within one control cycle and whether the knowledge layer flags or quarantines the record. If the pipeline keeps making identical decisions, the claimed closed-loop propagation is absent.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Trust governance would shift from one-time certification to continuous co-validation: data trust metadata must be updated by service and knowledge feedback.
  • Orchestrators would validate fitness-for-purpose of incoming data and expose governance telemetry, making each service call a cross-layer alignment point.
  • Knowledge systems would diagnose backward from outcomes, distinguishing data errors, service deviations, and outdated models instead of merely retraining.
  • A unified audit substrate would make root causes traceable across the whole chain, enabling automated certification and regulatory reporting.
  • Federated trust registries would allow multi-enterprise collaboration without sharing raw production data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same 'layered illusion of trust' diagnosis likely applies to other multi-layer AI pipelines, such as healthcare decision chains and financial services, where each component is certified but the composition is ungoverned.
  • Beyond the paper, TRISK's feedback structure implies that trust is not monotone: governance metrics should track negative corrections triggered by knowledge contradictions, not just improvements in service outcomes.
  • Beyond the paper, a testable extension is to use digital twins as experimental sandboxes, injecting controlled data-quality failures and measuring whether closed-loop feedback changes service behavior and knowledge updates within one control cycle.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes TRISK, a conceptual and taxonomic framework that integrates data, service, and knowledge governance under a five-dimensional trust model (quality, security, privacy, fairness, explainability). After motivating the need for cross-layer trust, it surveys 120+ works, organizes them into mechanism families for each governance layer, proposes an enterprise architecture with an orchestrator, semantic mediation, and feedback loops, describes a deployment in a 3C discrete manufacturing enterprise, and outlines a research agenda. The paper claims to formalize dynamic trust propagation across layers using Eqs. (1)-(3) and positions TRISK as the first unified cross-layer examination of industrial governance.

Significance. The main value of the paper, if the claims are properly scoped, is as a structured survey and conceptual roadmap: it synthesizes a broad literature, provides useful comparative tables of governance framework families, and offers a concrete architecture that connects data, service, and knowledge governance. The deployment discussion, though anecdotal, illustrates how the framework could be instantiated. However, the paper's stronger claim to 'formalize' dynamic cross-layer trust propagation is not substantiated: Eqs. (1)-(3) are explicitly indicative and do not actually couple the layers over time. There are no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or formal derivations, and the empirical evidence is limited to two uncontextualized percentages. The contribution is therefore best described as a taxonomy and design vision rather than a demonstrated formal or empirical result.

major comments (2)
  1. [VIII-A, Eqs. (1)-(3)] Equations (1)-(3) do not formalize the advertised cross-layer trust loop. Eq. (2) defines T_hat(t+delta t) as a static function F of TD(t), TS(t), TK(t); no equation advances one layer's state in response to another layer's state. Eq. (3) updates each Ti only from its own previous value and a local evidence signal oi(t), with Bi left unspecified; any Knowledge-to-Service-to-Data influence must be hidden inside Bi. The paper itself states in Section VIII-A that the formalization is 'intentionally succinct and indicative,' and earlier in the same section admits that 'the absence of formalized trust metrics ... limits the analytical rigor.' Yet the abstract and Section III.D present dynamic propagation and closed-loop feedback as core contributions. This is an internal-support gap: a reader cannot verify the central propagation mechanism from the formal core, and the deployment vignette in
  2. [VII.B] The paragraph introducing the industrial deployment says the case is used to 'demonstrate the practical effectiveness of TRISK,' but the only quantitative evidence is a '10% reduction in production scheduling latency' and a '12% improvement in equipment availability.' No baseline, measurement period, comparison condition, or uncertainty information is given, and no connection is established between these metrics and the five trust dimensions that TRISK is supposed to govern. If these numbers are intended as evidence of effectiveness, the description is too thin; if the case is meant only as a concrete illustration, the text should say so explicitly rather than assert demonstrated effectiveness.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Figures 3 and 5] The acronym 'TIDSG' appears in the figure labels; this is presumably a typo for 'TRISK'.
  2. [Table VIII] The column header 'Improvement' is confusing for MSE: entries such as '+6% to +304%' are described as improvements, but for MSE an increase denotes degradation. Clarify the sign convention or use a different metric direction.
  3. [II.B] The sentence 'these dimensions are mutually constraining each other' is grammatically awkward; consider 'mutually constrain one another.'
  4. [References] Reference [47] appears to duplicate [28] ('Trust in a decentralized world...'); please check and merge or distinguish them.
  5. [I] The abstract states 'more than 100 representative studies' while the text claims '120+' and 'over 120'; the terminology could be unified for consistency.
  6. [VIII-A] The text introduces a trust state theta_i(t) but Eq. (1) uses T_i(t); the notation should be aligned.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the paper is a survey/roadmap, its formal equations are explicitly labeled indicative, and self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

This paper is a survey and conceptual roadmap rather than a derivation. Its central contribution is the TRISK taxonomy/architecture, constructed by organizing external works along the QSPFE dimensions; no result in that synthesis is a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The only formal core, Section VIII-A Eqs. (1)-(3), is explicitly introduced as 'an indicative formalization of the trust loop' and the paper states 'This formalization is intentionally succinct and indicative.' Eq. (1) defines each layer trust state as an aggregator gi over five dimensions; Eq. (2) defines enterprise trust as a function F of layer states; Eq. (3) defines an exponential-smoothing update with a feedback map Bi. These are modeling conventions, not derived predictions: the paper makes no empirical claim that a chosen gi, F, or Bi produces a specific out-of-sample trust value. The propagation language ('F and Bi together express...') is definitional, but the paper itself flags this as a placeholder and lists a 'central theoretical challenge' as 'the absence of formalized trust metrics' and missing 'unified mathematical formulation' — i.e., it does not claim the equations prove the propagation. The deployment metrics (10% latency reduction, 12% availability improvement) are reported outcomes of a case study, not predictions derived from Eqs. (1)-(3). Self-citations such as [3], [13], [121] are peripheral supporting references and are not used to justify the uniqueness of TRISK or to supply the formal core. Consequently, there is no load-bearing circular step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

TRISK introduces a conceptual architecture and taxonomy but no new physical, computational, or data-level entities with falsifiable handles outside the framework itself. The 'TRISK Orchestrator', 'federated trust registry', and 'governance graph' are architectural components whose existence is only suggested, not independently evidenced, so they are not counted as invented entities with independent handles.

free parameters (2)
  • λ_i (per-layer update strength) = unspecified; defined in [0,1]
    Eq. (3) uses λ_i to control trust-state update strength. No method or data are given for choosing it, making the feedback loop an adjustable placeholder.
  • Aggregator g_i, propagation F, feedback maps B_i = unspecified functions
    Eqs. (1)-(3) leave g_i, F, and B_i as free functional degrees of freedom. The paper states they can be 'instantiated to meet domain requirements,' so the formalization has no fixed predictive content.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Quality, security, privacy, fairness, and explainability (QSPFE) are a complete and meaningful decomposition of industrial trust.
    Section II-B introduces the five dimensions and their layer-specific manifestations, but no argument or evidence establishes that these five exhaust or cleanly separate trust in industrial settings.
  • domain assumption Trust per layer can be scalarized to Ti(t) ∈ [0,1] and composed across layers via a function F.
    Eqs. (1)-(2) assume scalar layer states and an unknown composition operator; no justification is given that scalarization preserves the information needed for governance or audit decisions.
  • domain assumption Data, service, and knowledge are the correct three governance layers.
    The entire taxonomy in Section III is built on this trichotomy. Alternative decompositions—by lifecycle phase, organizational boundary, or risk domain—are not considered.
  • domain assumption The observed 10% latency reduction and 12% availability improvement in the 3C manufacturing deployment are attributable to TRISK.
    Section VII-B reports these numbers without a control period, baseline data, or consideration of alternative causes, so the causal attribution is assumed rather than demonstrated.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 27436 in / 8362 out tokens · 93512 ms · 2026-08-03T11:57:36.219902+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The convergence of artificial intelligence, cyber-physical systems, and distributed networking has accelerated the evolution of industrial intelligence across edge, cloud, and cross-organizational communication environments. However, existing governance mechanisms remain fragmented across data management, service orchestration, and knowledge-based decision-making, making it difficult to ensure reliability, accountability, compliance, and explainability throughout the industrial intelligence stack. To address this gap, we present TRISK (TRusted Industrial Data-Service-Knowledge governance), a conceptual and taxonomic framework for trustworthy industrial intelligence. TRISK is grounded in a five-dimensional trust model covering quality, security, privacy, fairness, and explainability, and formalizes how trust is constructed, propagated, aggregated, and fed back across data, service, and knowledge layers in networked industrial systems. Through a structured synthesis of more than 100 representative studies, standards, and technical reports, we examine data governance as the foundation of trust construction, service governance as the mediation layer for trustworthy execution, and knowledge governance as the semantic anchor for reasoning, validation, and feedback adaptation. We further discuss industrial implementation patterns, cross-industry implications, and the role of emerging communication and computing technologies. Finally, we outline a future research roadmap toward adaptive, verifiable, and human-aligned industrial governance for Industry 5.0.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.04569 by Albert Zomaya, Daojiang Hu, Hailiang Zhao, Jiahui Zhai, Jianwei Yin, Kai Di, Mengchu Zhou, Mingyi Liu, Shuiguang Deng, Xinkui Zhao, Zhongjie Wang, Ziqi Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Canonical illustrations of representative governance frameworks: (a) RAMI 4.0 model, (b) IDS connectors in a data space, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The orchestration of core sections in this paper. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: TRISK: a multi-layer governance fabric where trusted execution, dynamic data, governance-aware services, self-correcting knowledge, and unified auditing interweave to enable end-to-end trust propagation and closed-loop adaptation during governance. ontology-based policy engines). It often operates offline, detached from real-time execution feedback. However, these efforts rarely intersect meaningfully. The… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Blockchain-based access policy enforcement [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: TRISK highlights how data, service, and knowledge governance are interlinked through pairwise interactions. 1 Data quality and provenance affect service reliability, while service execution generates operational outputs that inform data curation and traceability. 2 Data provides the basis for knowledge modeling, and knowledge structures impose constraints that shape data semantics and validation. 3 Service… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Internal Coordination Mechanism of TRISK within an Enterprise System. B. Industrial Implementation of TRISK To demonstrate the practical effectiveness of TRISK, we refer to its deployment in a leading 3C discrete manufacturing enter￾prise that specializes in consumer electronics. The company oper￾ates multiple production lines across various plants, encompass￾ing precision machining, automated assembly, fu… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: System architecture of TRISK deployment in a 3C discrete manufacturing enterprise. and near-real-time visibility into the product lifecycle. Audit logs and feedback data are stored through secure APIs for compli￾ance tracking and continuous process refinement. The system architecture is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Roadmap for Future Research on TRISK. production lifecycle. Beyond individual enterprises, TRISK provides a foundational framework for enabling cross-industry collaboration through federated trust mechanisms. This direction reflects a broader shift from data-centric man￾agement to trust-centric industrial intelligence, where governance evolves into a dynamic capability that continuously learns and improves… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Digital twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues,

    Y . Luet al., “Digital twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues,”Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 61, pp. 101 837–10 187, 2020

    2020

  2. [2]

    Cost-minimized partial computation offloading in cloud- assisted mobile edge computing systems,

    J. Biet al., “Cost-minimized partial computation offloading in cloud- assisted mobile edge computing systems,” in2023 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, 2023, pp. 5052–5057

    2023

  3. [3]

    Online workload scheduling for social welfare maximization in the computing continuum,

    H. Zhaoet al., “Online workload scheduling for social welfare maximization in the computing continuum,”IEEE Trans. Services Comput., 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    A real-time big data gathering algorithm based on indoor wireless sensor networks for risk analysis of industrial operations,

    X. Dinget al., “A real-time big data gathering algorithm based on indoor wireless sensor networks for risk analysis of industrial operations,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1232–1242, 2015

    2015

  5. [5]

    Smart manufacturing systems: state of the art and future trends,

    Y . Quet al., “Smart manufacturing systems: state of the art and future trends,”Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 3751–3768, 2019

    2019

  6. [6]

    A survey of data-driven and knowledge-aware explainable ai,

    X.-H. Liet al., “A survey of data-driven and knowledge-aware explainable ai,”IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 29–49, 2020

    2020

  7. [7]

    A survey on blockchain-based trust management for internet of things,

    Y . Liuet al., “A survey on blockchain-based trust management for internet of things,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 5898– 5922, 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    Exploiting blockchain to make ai trustworthy: A software development lifecycle view,

    P. Zhanget al., “Exploiting blockchain to make ai trustworthy: A software development lifecycle view,”ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1–31, 2024. 18

    2024

  9. [9]

    A reference framework for the implementation of data governance systems for industry 4.0,

    M. Zorrillaet al., “A reference framework for the implementation of data governance systems for industry 4.0,”Comput. Stand. Inter., vol. 81, pp. 103 595–103 595, 2022

    2022

  10. [10]

    Ontology-based semantic reasoning for multi-source heterogeneous industrial devices using opc ua,

    J. Biet al., “Ontology-based semantic reasoning for multi-source heterogeneous industrial devices using opc ua,”IEEE Internet Things J., 2025

    2025

  11. [11]

    Ontology-driven knowledge graph for decision-making in resilience enhancement of underground structures: Framework and application,

    B.-L. Ganet al., “Ontology-driven knowledge graph for decision-making in resilience enhancement of underground structures: Framework and application,”Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech., vol. 163, pp. 106 739–106 739, 2025

    2025

  12. [12]

    An enhanced hybrid deep neural network method for adjusted industrial time series prediction with variable operating states,

    M. Zhanget al., “An enhanced hybrid deep neural network method for adjusted industrial time series prediction with variable operating states,” Expert Syst. Appl., pp. 130 029–130 029, 2025

    2025

  13. [13]

    Omnifuser: Adaptive multimodal fusion for service- oriented predictive maintenance,

    Z. Wanget al., “Omnifuser: Adaptive multimodal fusion for service- oriented predictive maintenance,”Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2511.01320, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    A data governance framework for industry 4.0,

    J. Yebenes Serranoet al., “A data governance framework for industry 4.0,”IEEE Lat. Am. Trans., vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2130–2138, 2021

    2021

  15. [15]

    Governance of smart service social responsibility: A systematic literature review,

    H. Nanet al., “Governance of smart service social responsibility: A systematic literature review,”IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., vol. 72, pp. 3365–3382, 2025

    2025

  16. [16]

    Knowledge graph quality management: A comprehensive survey,

    B. Xueet al., “Knowledge graph quality management: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 4969–4988, 2023

    2023

  17. [17]

    Xai for industry 5.0-concepts, opportunities, challenges, and future directions,

    T. R. Gadekalluet al., “Xai for industry 5.0-concepts, opportunities, challenges, and future directions,”IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 6, pp. 2706–2729, 2025

    2025

  18. [18]

    Deep generative models in the industrial internet of things: A survey,

    S. Deet al., “Deep generative models in the industrial internet of things: A survey,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 5728–5737, 2022

    2022

  19. [19]

    Alignment of the ieee industrial agents recommended practice standard with the reference architectures rami4.0, iira, and sgam,

    P. Leitaoet al., “Alignment of the ieee industrial agents recommended practice standard with the reference architectures rami4.0, iira, and sgam,”IEEE Open J. Ind. Electron. Soc., vol. 4, pp. 98–111, 2023

    2023

  20. [20]

    Rami 4.0 framework applied to industry 4.0 technologies deployment: Moroccan chemical industry use case,

    B. Tariqet al., “Rami 4.0 framework applied to industry 4.0 technologies deployment: Moroccan chemical industry use case,” in2023 7th IEEE Congress on Information Science and Technology (CiSt), 2023, pp. 384–388

    2023

  21. [21]

    Gaia-x based data ecosystem offerings in the context of data management systems,

    S. Forteet al., “Gaia-x based data ecosystem offerings in the context of data management systems,” in2024 IEEE 29th International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), 2024, pp. 1–6

    2024

  22. [22]

    Mbd-enhanced asset administration shell for generic production line design,

    Q. Luet al., “Mbd-enhanced asset administration shell for generic production line design,”IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Syst., vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 5593–5605, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    Towards a reference enterprise architecture to enforce digital sovereignty in international data spaces,

    D. R. Firdausyet al., “Towards a reference enterprise architecture to enforce digital sovereignty in international data spaces,” in2022 IEEE 24th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), vol. 01, 2022, pp. 117–125

    2022

  24. [24]

    A cybersecurity risk assessment methodology for industrial automation control systems,

    F. Brancatiet al., “A cybersecurity risk assessment methodology for industrial automation control systems,”Int. J. Inf. Secur., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 76–76, 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    Privacy in crises: The nist privacy framework,

    J. S. Hilleret al., “Privacy in crises: The nist privacy framework,”J. Contingencies Crisis Manag., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2017

    2017

  26. [26]

    Opportunities of gen ai in the banking industry with regards to the ai act, gdpr, data act and dora,

    I. Botunacet al., “Opportunities of gen ai in the banking industry with regards to the ai act, gdpr, data act and dora,” in2024 13th Mediterranean Conference on Embedded Computing (MECO), 2024, pp. 1–6

    2024

  27. [27]

    Themes from an ai and ml roundtable discussion,

    J. F. DeFranco, “Themes from an ai and ml roundtable discussion,” IEEE Reliability Magazine, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 42–45, 2024

    2024

  28. [28]

    Trust in a decentralized world: Data governance from faithful, private, verifiable, and traceable data feeds,

    M. Liet al., “Trust in a decentralized world: Data governance from faithful, private, verifiable, and traceable data feeds,”IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., vol. 20, pp. 10 818–10 833, 2025

    2025

  29. [29]

    An explainable and resilient intrusion detection system for industry 5.0,

    D. Javeedet al., “An explainable and resilient intrusion detection system for industry 5.0,”IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1342–1350, 2024

    2024

  30. [30]

    Data-based techniques focused on modern industry: An overview,

    S. Yinet al., “Data-based techniques focused on modern industry: An overview,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 657–667, 2015

    2015

  31. [31]

    Digital twin data management: A compre- hensive review,

    E. B. Ouedraogoet al., “Digital twin data management: A compre- hensive review,”IEEE Trans. Big Data, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 2224–2243, 2025

    2025

  32. [32]

    Blockchain intelligence: Intelligent blockchains for web 3.0 and beyond,

    J. Liet al., “Blockchain intelligence: Intelligent blockchains for web 3.0 and beyond,”IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Syst., vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 6633–6642, 2024

    2024

  33. [33]

    Optimized federated learning for trustworthy edge decision-making in iot consumer electronics,

    A. Rehmanet al., “Optimized federated learning for trustworthy edge decision-making in iot consumer electronics,”IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  34. [34]

    Fed-rdp: A robust federated learning framework for multi- party decision-making,

    J. Anet al., “Fed-rdp: A robust federated learning framework for multi- party decision-making,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 4009–4020, 2025

    2025

  35. [35]

    Toward zero touch networks: Cross-layer automated security solutions for 6g wireless networks,

    L. Yanget al., “Toward zero touch networks: Cross-layer automated security solutions for 6g wireless networks,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 7650–7679, 2025

    2025

  36. [36]

    Realizing supply chain benefits through technological- development-oriented supply chain innovation: The mediating role of supply chain transparency and supply chain embeddedness,

    Q. Yanget al., “Realizing supply chain benefits through technological- development-oriented supply chain innovation: The mediating role of supply chain transparency and supply chain embeddedness,”IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., vol. 72, pp. 3215–3235, 2025

    2025

  37. [37]

    Towards scalable, secure, and smart mission-critical iot systems: review and vision,

    X. Guoet al., “Towards scalable, secure, and smart mission-critical iot systems: review and vision,” inProceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Embedded Software, 2021, pp. 1–10

    2021

  38. [38]

    Control flow versus data flow in distributed systems integration: Revival of flow-based programming for the industrial internet of things,

    W. Hasselbringet al., “Control flow versus data flow in distributed systems integration: Revival of flow-based programming for the industrial internet of things,”IEEE Internet Comput., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 5–12, 2021

    2021

  39. [39]

    Cost-minimized computation offloading and user association in hybrid cloud and edge computing,

    J. Biet al., “Cost-minimized computation offloading and user association in hybrid cloud and edge computing,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 16 672–16 683, 2024

    2024

  40. [40]

    Electronic regulation of data sharing and processing using smart ledger technologies for supply-chain security,

    G. Epiphaniouet al., “Electronic regulation of data sharing and processing using smart ledger technologies for supply-chain security,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1059–1073, 2020

    2020

  41. [41]

    An integrated healthcare service system based on blockchain technologies,

    Q. Genget al., “An integrated healthcare service system based on blockchain technologies,”IEEE Trans. Comput. Social Syst., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 6278–6295, 2024

    2024

  42. [42]

    Defending against poisoning attacks in federated learning with blockchain,

    N. Donget al., “Defending against poisoning attacks in federated learning with blockchain,”IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 3743–3756, 2024

    2024

  43. [43]

    Data privacy threat modelling for autonomous systems: A survey from the gdpr’s perspective,

    N. Azamet al., “Data privacy threat modelling for autonomous systems: A survey from the gdpr’s perspective,”IEEE Trans. Big Data, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 388–414, 2023

    2023

  44. [44]

    Toward web3 applications: Easing the access and transition,

    G. Yuet al., “Toward web3 applications: Easing the access and transition,”IEEE Trans. Computat. Social Syst., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 6098–6111, 2024

    2024

  45. [45]

    Blockchain-cloud transparent data marketing: Consortium management and fairness,

    D. Liuet al., “Blockchain-cloud transparent data marketing: Consortium management and fairness,”IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 3322–3335, 2022

    2022

  46. [46]

    Facos: Enabling privacy protection through fine-grained access control with on-chain and off-chain system,

    C. Liuet al., “Facos: Enabling privacy protection through fine-grained access control with on-chain and off-chain system,”IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., vol. 19, pp. 7060–7074, 2024

    2024

  47. [47]

    Trust in a decentralized world: Data governance from faithful, private, verifiable, and traceable data feeds,

    M. Liet al., “Trust in a decentralized world: Data governance from faithful, private, verifiable, and traceable data feeds,”IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur., pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  48. [48]

    Using internet of things (iot) in agri-food supply chains: A research framework for social good with network clustering analysis,

    S. Yadavet al., “Using internet of things (iot) in agri-food supply chains: A research framework for social good with network clustering analysis,”IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 1215–1224, 2023

    2023

  49. [49]

    Trustworthy intelligent vehicle systems based on true autonomous organizations and operations: A new perspective,

    X. Lianget al., “Trustworthy intelligent vehicle systems based on true autonomous organizations and operations: A new perspective,”IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 3195–3204, 2024

    2024

  50. [50]

    Safe-serv: Energy-efficient decision delivery for provisioning safety-as-a-service,

    C. Royet al., “Safe-serv: Energy-efficient decision delivery for provisioning safety-as-a-service,”IEEE Trans. Services Comput., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1954–1966, 2022

    1954

  51. [51]

    Development of a cloud service for forecasting power outages of consumers with damage assessment based on thunderstorms data,

    A. G. Gruzdovet al., “Development of a cloud service for forecasting power outages of consumers with damage assessment based on thunderstorms data,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 7491– 7499, 2024

    2024

  52. [52]

    Hierarchical intelligent radio access network slicing for differential service level agreement guaranteeing,

    J. Liet al., “Hierarchical intelligent radio access network slicing for differential service level agreement guaranteeing,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 4124–4136, 2023

    2023

  53. [53]

    Design of industrial edge applications based on iec 61499 microservices and containers,

    W. Daiet al., “Design of industrial edge applications based on iec 61499 microservices and containers,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 7925–7935, 2023

    2023

  54. [54]

    Collaborative deployment and routing of industrial microservices in smart factories,

    M. Huet al., “Collaborative deployment and routing of industrial microservices in smart factories,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 12 758–12 770, 2024

    2024

  55. [55]

    Multi-perspective and energy-efficient deep learning in edge computing,

    H. Yuanet al., “Multi-perspective and energy-efficient deep learning in edge computing,”IEEE Internet Things J., pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  56. [56]

    Energy-delay-aware joint microservice deployment and request routing with dvfs in edge: A reinforcement learning approach,

    L. Wanget al., “Energy-delay-aware joint microservice deployment and request routing with dvfs in edge: A reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE Trans. Comput., vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 1589–1604, 2025

    2025

  57. [57]

    Autonomous lifecycle management for resource-efficient workload orchestration for green edge computing,

    F. Guimet al., “Autonomous lifecycle management for resource-efficient workload orchestration for green edge computing,”IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 571–582, 2022. 19

    2022

  58. [58]

    Intent-based service provisioning and closed- loop automation for cobot service migration in a multi-stakeholder environment,

    R. P. Orozcoet al., “Intent-based service provisioning and closed- loop automation for cobot service migration in a multi-stakeholder environment,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 4192–4205, 2025

    2025

  59. [59]

    Knowledge-driven intent life-cycle management for cellular networks,

    K. Mehmoodet al., “Knowledge-driven intent life-cycle management for cellular networks,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 4806–4826, 2025

    2025

  60. [60]

    Intrinsic security and self-adaptive cooperative protection enabling cloud native network slicing,

    W. Qianget al., “Intrinsic security and self-adaptive cooperative protection enabling cloud native network slicing,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1287–1304, 2021

    2021

  61. [61]

    Service function chaining and embedding with heterogeneous faults tolerance in edge networks,

    D. Zhenget al., “Service function chaining and embedding with heterogeneous faults tolerance in edge networks,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2157–2171, 2023

    2023

  62. [62]

    Explainable gnn-based approach to fault forecasting in cloud service debugging,

    D. Unyiet al., “Explainable gnn-based approach to fault forecasting in cloud service debugging,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., pp. 1–1, 2025

    2025

  63. [63]

    Model-driven availability assessment of the nfv-mano with software rejuvenation,

    B. Tolaet al., “Model-driven availability assessment of the nfv-mano with software rejuvenation,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 2460–2477, 2021

    2021

  64. [64]

    Automated service provisioning and hierarchical sla management in 5g systems,

    X. Liet al., “Automated service provisioning and hierarchical sla management in 5g systems,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 4669–4684, 2021

    2021

  65. [65]

    Saasc: Toward pay-as-you-go mode for software service transactions based on blockchain’s smart legal contracts,

    E. Chenet al., “Saasc: Toward pay-as-you-go mode for software service transactions based on blockchain’s smart legal contracts,”IEEE Trans. Services Comput., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 3665–3681, 2023

    2023

  66. [66]

    Blockchain-based service orchestration for 5g vertical industries in multicloud environment,

    E. Zeydanet al., “Blockchain-based service orchestration for 5g vertical industries in multicloud environment,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 4888–4904, 2022

    2022

  67. [67]

    Dynamic microservice allocation for virtual reality distribution with qoe support,

    D. Alencaret al., “Dynamic microservice allocation for virtual reality distribution with qoe support,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 729–740, 2022

    2022

  68. [68]

    A blockchain-based cross-domain and autonomous access control scheme for internet of things,

    X. Haoet al., “A blockchain-based cross-domain and autonomous access control scheme for internet of things,”IEEE Trans. Services Comput., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 773–786, 2023

    2023

  69. [69]

    Correct-by-design interacting smart contracts and a systematic approach for verifying erc20 and erc721 contracts with verisolid,

    K. Nelaturuet al., “Correct-by-design interacting smart contracts and a systematic approach for verifying erc20 and erc721 contracts with verisolid,”IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 3110–3127, 2023

    2023

  70. [70]

    Service regulation analysis framework for service design time: A case study of internet healthcare service,

    J. Chenet al., “Service regulation analysis framework for service design time: A case study of internet healthcare service,”IEEE Trans. Services Comput., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 2876–2889, 2024

    2024

  71. [71]

    Edge-based runtime verification for the internet of things,

    C. Tsigkanoset al., “Edge-based runtime verification for the internet of things,”IEEE Trans. Services Comput., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 2713–2727, 2022

    2022

  72. [72]

    A study in specification and hardware runtime verification of critical embedded software,

    D. Soletet al., “A study in specification and hardware runtime verification of critical embedded software,”IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 2258–2269, 2025

    2025

  73. [73]

    Smarla: A safety monitoring approach for deep reinforcement learning agents,

    A. Zolfagharianet al., “Smarla: A safety monitoring approach for deep reinforcement learning agents,”IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 82–105, 2025

    2025

  74. [74]

    A trustworthy framework for multi-cloud service management: Self-sovereign identity integration,

    E. Zeydanet al., “A trustworthy framework for multi-cloud service management: Self-sovereign identity integration,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 3135–3147, 2024

    2024

  75. [75]

    Jrs: A joint regulating scheme for secretly shared content based on blockchain,

    Q. Lyuet al., “Jrs: A joint regulating scheme for secretly shared content based on blockchain,”IEEE Trans. Netw. Service Manag., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 2957–2971, 2022

    2022

  76. [76]

    Programmable logic controllers past linear temporal logic for monitoring applications in industrial control systems,

    X. Maoet al., “Programmable logic controllers past linear temporal logic for monitoring applications in industrial control systems,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 4393–4405, 2022

    2022

  77. [77]

    Knowledge-enhanced distributed graph autoencoder for multiunit industrial plant-wide process monitoring,

    W. Wuet al., “Knowledge-enhanced distributed graph autoencoder for multiunit industrial plant-wide process monitoring,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1871–1883, 2024

    2024

  78. [78]

    Superheat degree recognition of aluminum electrolysis cell using unbalance double hierarchy hesitant linguistic petri nets,

    W. Yueet al., “Superheat degree recognition of aluminum electrolysis cell using unbalance double hierarchy hesitant linguistic petri nets,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 72, pp. 1–15, 2023

    2023

  79. [79]

    Automated detection and localization of myocardial infarction with interpretability analysis based on deep learning,

    C. Hanet al., “Automated detection and localization of myocardial infarction with interpretability analysis based on deep learning,”IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 72, pp. 1–12, 2023

    2023

  80. [80]

    A modular safety case for an iec-61508 compliant generic hypervisor,

    A. Larruceaet al., “A modular safety case for an iec-61508 compliant generic hypervisor,” in2015 Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design, 2015, pp. 571–574

    2015

Showing first 80 references.