Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Symmetry-controlled thermal activation in pyramidal Coulomb clusters: Testing Kramers-Langer theory

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that five laser-cooled calcium ions in a square-pyramidal configuration invert between mirror orientations at rates quantitatively described by multidimensional Kramers-Langer theory, spanning two orders of magnitude and

desk verdict A real experimental platform for multidimensional Kramers-Langer theory in a five-ion Coulomb cluster, with the pseudo-rotation pathway and isotope suppression genuinely novel; the experimental branch is partly calibration, and the underdamped regime needs a direct check. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.04883 v1 pith:GZEFFG2J submitted 2026-01-08 physics.atom-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

Akhil Ayyadevara , Anand Prakash , Shovan Dutta , Arun Paramekanti , S. A. Rangwala This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords trapped-ionCoulombclustersKramers-LangertheorythermallyactivatedinversionBerrypseudo-rotationpermutationsymmetrykineticisotopeeffectDoppler-cooledionsPaultrap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that a strongly coupled, mesoscopic system—five laser-cooled 40Ca+ ions in a Paul trap—undergoes thermally activated collective rearrangements that obey multidimensional Kramers-Langer escape theory. The ions form a square pyramid whose two mirror orientations are separated by a low barrier reached through a Berry pseudo-rotation, in which the apex ion exchanges roles with a base ion; the measured inversion rates, spanning more than two orders of magnitude as the trap anisotropy is varied, match K-L theory at a single fitted temperature of 1.8 ± 0.1 mK. Substituting a heavier 44Ca+ ion at the apex breaks the permutation symmetry, closes the low-barrier channel, and suppresses inversions, providing a structural analogue of kinetic isotope effects. If correct, this establishes trapped-ion Coulomb clusters as a controlled testbed for multidimensional rare-event kinetics and yields in-situ thermometry near the Doppler-cooling limit.

What carries the argument

The central object is the bistable square-pyramidal Coulomb cluster of five identical ions, with its two mirror configurations distinguished by the parity-odd octupole moment ψ30. The load-bearing identity is the multidimensional Kramers-Langer escape-rate formula: κ = (Nλ+/2π)(det U/|det U′|)^{1/2} exp(−Eb/kBT), where U and U′ are Hessians at the minimum and saddle, λ+ is the positive eigenvalue of the dynamical matrix, and N = 4 accounts for the four equivalent ways the apex can swap with a base ion. The Berry pseudo-rotation is the low-barrier minimum-energy path connecting the two pyramids; it is found with the climbing-image nudged elastic band method and requires the permutation symmet

What would settle it

At a temperature set independently (for example by resolved-sideband thermometry or Doppler-profile analysis), measure the inversion rate over the same range of α and compare with the K-L prediction using no fitted temperature; disagreement beyond the reported uncertainty would falsify the parameter-free claim. Alternatively, vary the laser detuning or intensity to change the friction coefficient and check whether the measured rates follow the K-L prefactor's predicted dependence on γ.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the inversion of the five-ion square-pyramidal cluster is a thermally activated, multidimensional escape process whose rate is quantitatively captured by the Kramers-Langer formula. The paper identifies the transition pathway as a Berry pseudo-rotation rather than umbrella inversion: the apex ion swaps with a base ion, keeping ions farther apart and lowering the barrier by roughly two orders of magnitude. Experimentally measured inversion rates, spanning about two orders of magnitude as the aspect ratio α is tuned, agree with K-L theory with only the temperature as a free parameter, giving T = 1.8 ± 0.1 mK; MD simulations agree without any fitted parameters. When th

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on modeling the Doppler-cooling lasers as a Markovian Langevin bath with a single friction coefficient and white noise obeying fluctuation-dissipation; if the bath is non-Markovian, friction is anisotropic, or energy diffusion limits escape, the fitted 1.8 mK temperature and the apparent agreement with K-L theory could be artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Multidimensional Kramers-Langer theory quantitatively describes thermally activated escape in a strongly coupled many-body Coulomb system, with MD and experiment matching over a wide range of barriers.
  • The inversion rate provides a self-contained thermometer: the fitted 1.8 ± 0.1 mK is an in-situ measurement of the Doppler-cooled cluster temperature.
  • Trap aspect ratio continuously tunes the activation barrier, so the same platform can explore fast and slow rare-event regimes.
  • Permutation symmetry is a control knob: breaking it by isotope substitution suppresses thermal activation, a structural analogue of kinetic isotope effects.
  • The same experimental observable can probe other laser-cooling protocols and, in principle, internal-state-controlled symmetry breaking.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Markovian bath model is accepted, Coulomb clusters become a clean system for testing extensions of rare-event theory—for example, non-Markovian or memory-dependent baths—by comparing rates under different cooling configurations.
  • A natural experiment would be to replace isotope pinning with optical or internal-state control of the apex ion, making the reaction channel programmable in real time rather than fixed by composition.
  • Because the fitted temperature is so close to the Doppler limit, one could check consistency against independent thermometry, such as sideband or Doppler-profile measurements; agreement would place the inferred temperature on firmer ground.
  • The observation that background-gas-induced inversions are also rarer in the isotope-substituted cluster suggests that even collision-driven rare events ride the same symmetry-selected pathways, which could be quantified with a collisional kick model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments on five laser-cooled 40Ca+ ions in a Paul trap, configured as a bistable square pyramid. By tuning the trap anisotropy α, the authors measure the rate of thermally activated inversions between the two pyramidal orientations, spanning about two orders of magnitude. They identify the inversion mechanism as a low-barrier Berry pseudo-rotation enabled by permutation symmetry, as opposed to the high-barrier umbrella inversion. They model the dynamics with underdamped Langevin equations, compute barriers and prefactors with the multidimensional Kramers-Langer formula, and compare with molecular dynamics simulations. From the experimental rates they extract a cluster temperature T = 1.8 ± 0.1 mK and a background-collision rate R_bg = 0.10 ± 0.03 s^-1. Substituting the apex ion with 44Ca+ breaks the pseudo-rotation channel and suppresses inversions, giving a structural analog of a kinetic isotope effect. The central claims are: (i) the Kramers-Langer theory quantitatively captures the measured rates, and (ii) the fitted T is a genuine physical temperature of the Doppler-cooled cluster.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this would be a significant demonstration: a mesoscopic Coulomb cluster with a precisely known Hamiltonian provides a quantitative, multidimensional test of Kramers-Langer escape theory, and the symmetry-controlled inversion pathways offer a new platform for studying collective activated dynamics. The paper has several concrete strengths: the cNEB calculation of minimum-energy paths, the toy-model validation of the degeneracy factor N=4, the isotope-substitution control experiment, and the use of direct fluorescence time traces to extract dwell times. The MD branch, if fully documented, is a parameter-free comparison in the sense that temperature is an input and no rates are fitted. However, the experimental branch fits both T and R_bg to the same rate-vs-α curve, and the deeply underdamped regime raises a serious question about the validity of the adopted rate formula. These issues need to be resolved before the paper can support its conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Testing Kramers-Langer theory; Eqs. (2)-(4)] The analysis operates in a deeply underdamped regime: the MD and theory set γ/m ≈ 6×10^3 s^-1 while the secular frequencies are ω/2π ≈ 1 MHz, so γ/(mω) ≈ 10^-3. Equation (3) with λ+ from Eq. (4) is the spatial-diffusion Kramers-Langer rate. In this low-damping regime, the true Langevin escape rate is expected to be controlled by energy diffusion and to be much smaller than the spatial-diffusion prediction, unless a separate mechanism restores the Boltzmann population near the barrier. The manuscript does not discuss the Kramers turnover condition or compute a Mel'nikov-Meshkov correction. Since the claim that MD simulations agree with Eq. (3) is central and surprising, the paper must provide a quantitative check of the turnover regime, e.g., a scan in γ/m over several orders of magnitude showing where Eq. (3) breaks down, or a mechanistic explanation of why multidimensional energy redist
  2. [Fig. 3 and following paragraph] The experimental comparison is not a parameter-free test: the same rate-vs-α curve is used to fit both T and R_bg. The statement that the K-L prediction captures the data over two orders of magnitude is therefore partly a calibration of the theory. The claimed thermometry T = 1.8 ± 0.1 mK is the fitted value, not an independent measurement. To support the claim, the authors should either fit T using only a subset of the data and predict the rest, provide an independent estimate of the Doppler temperature from cooling parameters, or at least quantify the covariance between T and R_bg. The paper should also be explicit that the experimental branch is a fit, reserving 'parameter-free' for the MD branch.
  3. [MD simulations and Fig. 3 inset] The MD comparison with K-L theory is the only parameter-free test, but the manuscript provides no numerical data, error bars, or convergence details for the rates in the inset. Given that the MD rates are used to validate Eq. (3) in precisely the regime where the formula is suspect, the comparison must be documented in a verifiable way. A table listing κ_MD and κ_KL for each α and T, with statistical uncertainties and the number of events, is needed. In addition, γ/m is not independently measured; it is 'set from the experimental cooling value.' In the energy-diffusion regime the rate depends strongly on γ, so the uncertainty in γ propagates directly into the extracted temperature. The authors should quantify this sensitivity.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Supplemental Material, 'Equilibrium configurations'] The text says 'the heavier isotope 40Ca+ at the apex' and 'a local minimum with lighter isotope 40Ca+'; both should refer to 44Ca+ as the heavier isotope. Please correct these typos.
  2. [Eq. (3) and surrounding text] The Hessians U and U' are not introduced before Eq. (3); define them explicitly as the Hessian matrices at the minimum and saddle point, respectively, and state the sign convention for the unstable mode.
  3. [Fig. 3 inset] The inset is too small to evaluate the claimed agreement. Add axis labels, numerical tick values, and ideally overlay the MD points with the K-L curve; a supplementary table would be even better.
  4. [Experimental methods, rate extraction] The fluorescence images are recorded at 30 frames per second. For the fastest inversion rates near the threshold, the finite imaging exposure may bias the dwell-time distribution. Please discuss whether this time resolution affects the exponential fits and the extracted rates.
  5. [Abstract and main text] The abstract and text use the phrase 'parameter-free test' for the experimental measurement, but the analysis involves two fitted parameters (T and R_bg). Please qualify this wording so it applies only to the MD comparison.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Experimental rate comparison is a two-parameter fit (T, R_bg) to the same data it claims to validate; the parameter-free MD branch keeps the central K-L test non-circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Main text, 'Testing Kramers-Langer theory' section, paragraph after Fig. 3; see also Fig. 3 caption]
    "The experimentally measured inversion rate exhibits a clear threshold behavior (Fig. 3). For α < αth ∼1.1, it grows rapidly as the barrier height is lowered, whereas for α > αth, it saturates to Rbg = 0.10±0.03 s−1 due to background-gas collisions. The excess rate for α < αth follows the K-L prediction over two orders of magnitude for a fitted temperature of T = 1.8±0.1 mK."

    The 'agreement' is produced by fitting the parameters T and R_bg to the very same measured rate data that the K-L curve is then said to 'follow'. The paper is transparent about this ('fitted temperature'; Fig. 3 caption: 'fitted to the K-L theory to determine the cluster temperature T'), so the two-orders-of-magnitude match is a best-fit calibration, not an independent prediction. The abstract's claim that 'experimentally measured inversion rates... are accurately captured' inherits this fitted nature. The MD inset, by contrast, is parameter-free and supplies the genuinely non-circular test of K-L theory.

full rationale

The only substantive circular component is the experimental branch of Fig. 3: the K-L curve is evaluated using T and R_bg obtained by fitting the same measured rates, so the experimental 'capture' of the data is partly by construction. This is the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern, and it is why the abstract's 'captured... enabling thermometry' framing is weaker than a parameter-free test. However, the central validation of K-L theory does not rest on this fit alone: the MD simulations use the microscopic Langevin dynamics with temperature as an input and compare to the K-L prediction without any fit parameters (Fig. 3 inset), the cNEB barriers and Hessians come from the known trap-plus-Coulomb Hamiltonian, and the N=4 pathway multiplicity is checked in a separate 2D toy model. The self-citations ([10], [18]) supply trap-characterization and previous cluster observations but are not load-bearing for the theoretical derivation. The underdamped-regime objection (γ/mω ~ 10^-3) is a physical correctness risk concerning the applicability of the spatial-diffusion K-L formula and the Kramers turnover, not an instance of circular reasoning, so it is noted but does not increase the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rest on the known trap-plus-Coulomb Hamiltonian and standard rate theory, with two fitted experimental numbers (T, R_bg) and a chosen friction coefficient. No new physical entities are introduced; pseudo-rotation and turnstile are mechanistic labels borrowed from molecular stereochemistry.

free parameters (3)
  • Cluster temperature T = 1.8 ± 0.1 mK
    Fitted to the experimental inversion-rate curve in Fig. 3; used in the K-L rate and then reported as the measured cluster temperature. This is the main fitted quantity that makes the experimental 'agreement' possible.
  • Background collision rate R_bg = 0.10 ± 0.03 s^-1
    Fitted as the saturation rate at high α in Fig. 3; adds a constant Poisson offset to the thermal K-L rate.
  • Friction coefficient γ/m = ≈6×10^3 s^-1
    Set in the SM from laser cooling parameters and used in Eq. (4) and in MD. No direct independent measurement or uncertainty is provided, so it functions as a hand-chosen input to the rate prefactor.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Paul trap can be described by a time-averaged harmonic pseudo-potential with cylindrical symmetry and tunable α (Eq. 1).
    Standard for adiabatic Paul traps with |a|, q^2 << 1; established in prior work, but it is a modeling assumption for the real rf trap.
  • domain assumption Doppler cooling is equivalent to a Markovian Langevin bath with linear friction and white noise satisfying the fluctuation-dissipation relation at temperature T.
    Appears in Eq. (2) and SM Eq. (SE4); central to both MD and K-L predictions. The paper does not directly verify Markovianity or isotropy of friction; this is the weakest modeling premise.
  • domain assumption The multidimensional Kramers-Langer formula, with the Goldstone mode excluded and N = 4, gives the correct escape rate.
    This is the theory under test. Its applicability in the underdamped regime is checked by MD, but it is not derived in this paper.
  • standard math cNEB calculations converge to the true minimum-energy path and first-order saddle.
    The authors verify against root-finding for the saddle (SM; energy difference < 1 µK), so this axiom is well-supported in the text.
  • domain assumption The zero-frequency Goldstone mode can be omitted from the Hessian determinants in the K-L prefactor.
    Stated as 'as usual [3]' in the main text and SM; standard in reaction-rate theory for continuous symmetries.
  • domain assumption For the isotope-doped cluster, the 44Ca+ ion occupies the apex in the relevant global minimum.
    Obtained from gradient-descent minimization in SM; depends on the mass-dependent pseudo-potential model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Symmetry-controlled thermal activation in pyramidal Coulomb clusters: Testing Kramers-Langer theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GZEFFG2J

@misc{pith2026260104883,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Symmetry-controlled thermal activation in pyramidal Coulomb clusters: Testing Kramers-Langer theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GZEFFG2J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.04883}
}
abstract

Laser-cooled ions confined in electromagnetic traps provide a unique, tunable mesoscopic system where the interplay of the trapping potential, nonlinear Coulomb interactions, and laser-ion scattering generates rich, collective dynamics. In this work, we engineer thermally activated switching between two oppositely oriented, square-pyramidal configurations of five laser-cooled ions in a Paul trap. For identical ions ($^{40}\mathrm{Ca}^{+}$), the inversions proceed via a \textit{Berry pseudo-rotation} mechanism with a low activation barrier, enabled by the permutation symmetry, in contrast to the \textit{umbrella inversion} observed in ammonia. The experimentally measured inversion rates, spanning two orders of magnitude, are accurately captured by the multidimensional Kramers-Langer theory, enabling thermometry of the Doppler-cooled ion cluster at $1.8 \pm 0.1$ mK. By substituting the apex ion with a heavier isotope ($^{44}\mathrm{Ca}^{+}$), we break the permutation symmetry and observe a suppression of thermally activated inversions. Numerical analysis reveals that this symmetry breaking closes the low-barrier channel, forcing the system to invert through a high-barrier \textit{turnstile rotation}. Thus, we demonstrate a structural analogue of molecular kinetic isotope effects, establishing trapped ions as a versatile platform to explore symmetry-controlled collective dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.04883 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Inversion mechanisms for a pyramidal ion cluster. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Experimentally measured pyramidal inversion rates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Endcap-Type Paul Trap for Precision Spectroscopy and Studies of Controlled Interactions

    physics.atom-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A built-and-tested endcap Paul trap traps single Ca+ ions with a measured quadrupole coefficient of 0.300±0.002 and residual micromotion corresponding to a 3.5×10^-18 frequency shift.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Peters,Reaction Rate Theory and Rare Events Simu- lations(Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2017)

    B. Peters,Reaction Rate Theory and Rare Events Simu- lations(Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2017)

    2017

  2. [2]

    Kramers, Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions, Physica (Amster- dam)7A, 284 (1940)

    H. Kramers, Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions, Physica (Amster- dam)7A, 284 (1940)

    1940

  3. [3]

    H¨ anggi, P

    P. H¨ anggi, P. Talkner, and M. Borkovec, Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after Kramers, Rev. Mod. Phys.62, 251 (1990)

    1990

  4. [4]

    McCann, M

    L. McCann, M. Dykman, and B. Golding, Thermally ac- tivated transitions in a bistable three-dimensional optical trap, Nature402, 785 (1999)

    1999

  5. [5]

    Rondinet al., Direct measurement of Kramers turnover with a levitated nanoparticle, Nat

    L. Rondinet al., Direct measurement of Kramers turnover with a levitated nanoparticle, Nat. Nanotech- 5 nol.12, 1130 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    T. Li, S. Kheifets, D. Medellin, and M. G. Raizen, Mea- surement of the instantaneous velocity of a Brownian par- ticle, Science328, 1673 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    Berezhkovskii and A

    A. Berezhkovskii and A. Szabo, One-dimensional reac- tion coordinates for diffusive activated rate processes in many dimensions, J. Chem. Phys.122, 014503 (2005)

    2005

  8. [8]

    Zijlstra, D

    N. Zijlstra, D. Nettels, R. Satija, D. E. Makarov, and B. Schuler, Transition path dynamics of a dielectric par- ticle in a bistable optical trap, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 146001 (2020)

    2020

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Langer, Statistical theory of the decay of metastable states, Ann

    J. Langer, Statistical theory of the decay of metastable states, Ann. Phys.54, 258 (1969)

    1969

  2. [10]

    Ayyadevara, A

    A. Ayyadevara, A. Prakash, S. Dutta, A. Paramekanti, and S. A. Rangwala, Observing the dynamics of octupo- lar structural transitions in trapped-ion clusters (2025), arXiv:2505.16378 [physics.atom-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Mizukami, G

    N. Mizukami, G. Gatta, L. Duca, and C. Sias, Emulat- ing isomerization with two-dimensional Coulomb crystals (2025), arXiv:2508.05902 [physics.atom-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Javanainen and S

    J. Javanainen and S. Stenholm, Laser cooling of trapped particles i: The heavy particle limit, Appl. Phys.21, 283 (1980)

    1980

  5. [13]

    Javanainen, Light-pressure cooling of a crystal, Phys

    J. Javanainen, Light-pressure cooling of a crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 1798 (1986)

    1986

  6. [14]

    Morigi and J

    G. Morigi and J. Eschner, Doppler cooling of a Coulomb crystal, Phys. Rev. A64, 063407 (2001)

    2001

  7. [15]

    Landa, M

    H. Landa, M. Drewsen, B. Reznik, and A. Retzker, Modes of oscillation in radiofrequency Paul traps, New J. Phys.14, 093023 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    Kaufmann, S

    H. Kaufmann, S. Ulm, G. Jacob, U. Poschinger, H. Landa, A. Retzker, M. B. Plenio, and F. Schmidt- Kaler, Precise experimental investigation of eigenmodes in a planar ion crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 263003 (2012)

    2012

  9. [17]

    Kiethe, L

    J. Kiethe, L. Timm, H. Landa, D. Kalincev, G. Morigi, and T. E. Mehlst¨ aubler, Finite-temperature spectrum at the symmetry-breaking linear to zigzag transition, Phys. Rev. B103, 104106 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Prakash, A

    A. Prakash, A. Ayyadevara, E. Krishnakumar, and S. A. Rangwala, Low divergence cold-wall oven for loading ion traps, Rev. Sci. Instrum.95, 033202 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    See Supplemental Material for experimental and numeri- cal methods, and a toy problem to demonstrate the mul- tiplicity factor in K-L rates under degenerate pathways

  12. [20]

    Henkelman, B

    G. Henkelman, B. P. Uberuaga, and H. J´ onsson, A climb- ing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths, J. Chem. Phys.113, 9901 (2000)

    2000

  13. [21]

    J. M. Lehn, Nitrogen inversion, inDynamic Stereochem- istry, Fortschritte der Chemischen Forschung, Vol. 15/3 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1970)

    1970

  14. [22]

    R. S. Berry, Correlation of rates of intramolecular tun- neling processes, with application to some group V com- pounds, J. Chem. Phys.32, 933 (1960)

    1960

  15. [23]

    Coplenet al., Isotope-abundance variations of selected elements (IUPAC technical report), Pure Appl

    T. Coplenet al., Isotope-abundance variations of selected elements (IUPAC technical report), Pure Appl. Chem. 74, 1987 (2002)

    1987

  16. [24]

    Matsukawa, H

    S. Matsukawa, H. Yamamichi, Y. Yamamoto, and K. Ando, Pentacoordinate organoantimony compounds that isomerize by turnstile rotation, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 3418 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    E. P. A. Couzijn, J. C. Slootweg, A. W. Ehlers, and K. Lammertsma, Stereomutation of pentavalent com- pounds: Validating the Berry pseudorotation, redressing Ugi’s turnstile rotation, and revealing the two- and three- arm turnstiles, J. Am. Chem. Soc.132, 18127 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    Z. Zhao, Z. Zhang, S. Liu,et al., Dynamical barrier and isotope effects in the simplest substitution reaction via Walden inversion mechanism, Nat. Commun.8, 14506 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    L. S. Petralia, A. Tsikritea, J. Loreau,et al., Strong in- verse kinetic isotope effect observed in ammonia charge exchange reactions, Nat. Commun.11, 173 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    S. Ulm, J. Roßnagel, G. Jacob,et al., Observation of the Kibble–Zurek scaling law for defect formation in ion crystals, Nat. Commun.4, 2290 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    K. Pyka, J. Keller, H. Partner,et al., Topological de- fect formation and spontaneous symmetry breaking in ion Coulomb crystals, Nat. Commun.4, 2291 (2013)

    2013

  22. [30]

    Leibfried, R

    D. Leibfried, R. Blatt, C. Monroe, and D. Wineland, Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 281 (2003)

    2003

  23. [31]

    Lyons, A

    A. Lyons, A. Devi, N. Q. Hoffer, and M. T. Woodside, Quantifying the properties of nonproductive attempts at thermally activated energy-barrier crossing through di- rect observation, Phys. Rev. X14, 011017 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    A. M. Berezhkovskii and D. E. Makarov, Barrier recross- ing dynamics and phenomenological rate equations from single-molecule perspective, J. Chem. Phys.163, 051101 (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    Paganoet al., Cryogenic trapped-ion system for large scale quantum simulation, Quantum Sci

    G. Paganoet al., Cryogenic trapped-ion system for large scale quantum simulation, Quantum Sci. Technol.4, 014004 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    D. Reiß, K. Abich, W. Neuhauser, C. Wunderlich, and P. E. Toschek, Raman cooling and heating of two trapped ba+ ions, Phys. Rev. A65, 053401 (2002)

    2002

  27. [35]

    Roßnagel, K

    J. Roßnagel, K. N. Tolazzi, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and K. Singer, Fast thermometry for trapped ions using dark resonances, New J. Phys.17, 045004 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    de Neeve, T.-L

    B. de Neeve, T.-L. Nguyen, A. Ferk, T. Behrle, F. Lan- cellotti, M. Simoni, S. Welte, and J. P. Home, Modu- lar variable laser cooling for efficient entropy extraction, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 203603 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Mazzanti, R

    M. Mazzanti, R. Gerritsma, R. J. C. Spreeuw, and A. Safavi-Naini, Trapped ions quantum logic gate with optical tweezers and the Magnus effect, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033036 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Z. Sun, Y. H. Teoh, F. Rajabi, and R. Islam, Two- dimensional ion crystals in a hybrid optical cavity trap for quantum information processing, Phys. Rev. A109, 032426 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Mallweger, N

    M. Mallweger, N. Kuk, V. Shankar, R. Thomm, H. Parke, I. Straka, W. Li, I. Lesanovsky, and M. Hen- nrich, Probing electronic state-dependent conformational changes in a trapped Rydberg ion Wigner crystal (2025), arXiv:2507.23631 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Schrama, E

    C. Schrama, E. Peik, W. Smith, and H. Walther, Novel miniature ion traps, Opt. Commun.101, 32 (1993)

    1993

  34. [42]

    Grønbech-Jensen and O

    N. Grønbech-Jensen and O. Farago, A simple and effec- tive Verlet-type algorithm for simulating Langevin dy- namics, Mol. Phys.111, 983 (2013). S1 Supplemental Material EXPERIMENT AL SYSTEM T rap potential We confine the calcium ions in an end-cap type 3D Paul trap [41] with a...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.