Chiral Graviton Modes in Fermionic Fractional Chern Insulators

Hernan B. Xavier; Hongyu Lu; Marcello Dalmonte; Min Long; Zeno Bacciconi; Zi Yang Meng

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Chiral Graviton Modes in Fermionic Fractional Chern Insulators

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that chiral graviton modes—spin-2 geometric collective excitations—exist as long-lived excitations in fermionic fractional Chern insulators and are adiabatically connected to their fractional quantum Hall counterparts.

desk verdict A well-executed numerical study that makes the strongest current case for long-lived chiral graviton modes in fermionic FCIs, with a genuine caveat about the lattice graviton operator definition. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.05196 v2 pith:MGDZD4DP submitted 2026-01-08 cond-mat.str-el quant-ph

Min Long , Zeno Bacciconi , Hongyu Lu , Hernan B. Xavier , Zi Yang Meng , Marcello Dalmonte This is my paper

classification cond-mat.str-elquant-ph MSC 81V7082B20 PACS 73.43.-f71.10.-w

keywords chiralgravitonfractionalCherninsulatorquantumHalllatticestresstensorquadrupolardensitycorrelatorHarper-Hofstadtercheckerboardmagnetoroton

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

For a ν=1/3 fermionic fractional Chern insulator on a checkerboard lattice, the paper claims that a chiral, spin-2 collective excitation—the lattice analogue of the fractional quantum Hall graviton—exists as a well-defined long-lived mode, even though the lattice breaks the continuous translation and rotation symmetries that are believed to protect the mode in the continuum. The authors construct a lattice stress tensor operator for the Harper–Hofstadter model and show that, in the continuum limit, it is identical to a quadrupolar density correlator built from short-range density pairs, a form that generalises to generic Chern bands. Numerically, using exact diagonalisation and matrix-product-state simulations, they track the mode's spectral peak through an adiabatic interpolation from a low-flux Harper–Hofstadter model (FQH-like) to the checkerboard flat band (FCI), finding a continuously evolving, sharply chiral peak. A finite-size lifetime analysis yields an intrinsic decay rate of order one tenth of the graviton energy at the checkerboard point, with no marked growth as system size increases up to the sizes studied. If true, the graviton is a unifying geometric excitation of continuum and lattice fractional topological phases, and its chiral spectral response becomes a practical probe of FCI phases.

What carries the argument

The central object is the lattice quadrupolar density operator O_nn^{±} = Σ_{r,δ} e^{±2i arg δ} f_G(δ) n_r n_{r+δ}, with f_G(δ)=1/|δ| and a cutoff at |δ|=2√2 (chosen to include next-nearest-neighbour pairs on the checkerboard super-lattice). It is a short-range, chiral, spin-2 probe of the dynamics of the correlation hole; in the Landau-level limit the paper proves it flows to the continuum stress-tensor operator of a V1 pseudopotential interaction, using the identity ∂_{q*} F_G(|q|)=q² V_G(|q|). The lattice stress tensor T^{ab} itself, derived from i[H, j^a], is the other device; the two operators give overlapping spectra whose distance vanishes as n_φ³ in the continuum limit. The lifetime

What would settle it

One decisive check: in a Chern band with the same flatness and interactions but with the Berry curvature artificially made uniform (e.g. by tuning hoppings along a path that keeps the band flat), compute I_nn^{±}. If the peak position, chirality, or decay rate fails to track the change in quantum geometry, then the operator is capturing a generic short-range density mode rather than the geometric graviton. A second check: measure the linewidth as a function of interaction V; the paper predicts Γ_G ∝ V at large V—if the mode instead broadens faster than linearly or disappears as V increases wit

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that 'a well-defined chiral graviton mode exists in FCI phases and is adiabatically connected to FQH graviton-modes.' The proof strategy is to exhibit the mode, not to derive it from a symmetry. Starting from the fermionic Harper–Hofstadter model at 1/8 flux per plaquette—a lattice limit that reproduces lowest-Landau-level physics—the authors derive a lattice stress tensor operator from the Heisenberg equation of the current, and show analytically that it coincides in the continuum limit with a chiral quadrupolar density–density operator O_nn carrying phase e^{±2i arg δ}. They then use that operator to compute spectral functions across an interpolation

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the quadrupolar density operator with the chosen weight 1/r and cutoff 2√2 faithfully represents the emergent-metric fluctuation (graviton) in a generic Chern band; its identification with the stress tensor is proven only in the Landau-level limit, and there is no independent lattice definition of the graviton away from that limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A chiral, spin-2 graviton peak should be visible in the dynamical density response of FCI phases, including in moiré materials and cold-atom implementations, even though the mode sits inside the two-magnetoroton continuum.
The graviton mode is adiabatically connected between FQH and FCI limits, so its existence does not require continuous translation or rotation symmetry; the lattice merely broadens it.
The ratio of integrated chiral weights N−/N+ of this operator can serve as a phase witness separating FCI from Fermi-liquid behaviour.
The intrinsic decay rate Γ_G/ω_G stays small (≈0.1) toward the thermodynamic limit at the checkerboard point, with no strong N-dependence up to the sizes studied.
Because the quadrupolar operator reduces to the stress tensor in the continuum limit, short-range density correlators are a legitimate substitute for the stress tensor in generic Chern bands with non-uniform Berry curvature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the operator equivalence holds beyond the Landau-level limit, then the 'emergent metric' of an FCI can be read off from short-range density correlations alone; one could test this by computing the same correlator in a band whose quantum geometry is tuned independently of its flatness, e.g. via artificial Berry-curvature engineering.
The paper leaves open what protects the mode: the suppression of scattering matrix elements despite a large density of states. Identifying that selection rule could predict when the decay rate will diverge in other Chern bands or at other fillings.
The same probe could be applied to non-Abelian lattice phases (e.g. bosonic Pfaffian-type states) or to the fractional quantum Hall nematic transition, where the graviton gap closing is the expected mechanism; measurement of Γ_G across the transition would be a direct test.
The 1/4-flux interpolation comparison suggests a trade-off between band flatness and quantum geometry for graviton lifetime; a controlled study varying one at a time could turn this qualitative observation into a quantitative criterion.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Min, quick take: this is the paper to read on the FCI graviton question. It does something genuinely new: it constructs a fermionic lattice stress tensor for the Harper-Hofstadter model, shows analytically that in the continuum limit it reduces to the same object as a quadrupolar density correlator, and then uses that correlator to track a chiral spin-2 mode along an interpolation from a low-flux HH model to a checkerboard FCI. The numerical work is thorough — ED, projected ED, and MPS/TDVP cross-check each other, and the appendix is honest about convergence.

The lattice stress tensor derivation (Eqs. 11–13) is a real advance over the bosonic construction in Ref. [24]. And the comparison between the two operators in Fig. 3, with the overlap distance going as n_phi^3, is a nice, controlled piece of evidence that the density operator captures the same physics near the continuum.

The main soft spot is the one the authors themselves flag: the quadrupolar operator O_nn has a hand-picked weight f_G(r)=1/r and cutoff, and its equivalence to the stress tensor is proven only in the Landau-level limit. At the checkerboard point, there is no independent lattice definition of the emergent metric against which to check — so strictly speaking, the paper demonstrates adiabatic continuity of a quadrupolar density excitation, not that this excitation is 'the' metric graviton. That is a real limitation, but it is not a hole in the argument: given the lack of consensus on lattice graviton operators, this is the best available definition, and the authors are explicit about it.

The lifetime extraction is the shakiest part. The 1/N extrapolation is done on oscillating decay rates for N<=12, and the authors admit they cannot exclude divergence. They hedge appropriately, but the abstract's 'long-lived' phrasing goes a bit beyond what the data can firmly establish. I would call the lifetime claim plausible and well-supported at the level of finite-size evidence, but not proven in the thermodynamic sense.

Who is this for: anyone working on FCI collective modes, moiré materials, or cold-atom probes. It gives a concrete operator and a usable spectroscopic witness. It deserves a serious referee — the concerns I have are addressable and the authors have already partially addressed them.

Recommendation: send it to review. A good referee will push on the operator identification and the lifetime extrapolation, but both are legitimate open questions rather than fatal flaws.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper claims to demonstrate the existence of long-lived chiral graviton modes in fermionic fractional Chern insulators (FCIs) and their adiabatic connection to the fractional quantum Hall (FQH) graviton. The authors derive a lattice stress tensor operator for the Harper–Hofstadter model, show that a quadrupolar density–density operator reduces to the same continuum stress tensor in the Landau-level limit, and then use exact diagonalization, projected ED, and MPS/TDVP simulations to track the spectral peak of this operator along an interpolation from a low-flux Harper–Hofstadter model to a checkerboard-lattice FCI. A finite-size analysis of the peak width is used to extract an intrinsic decay rate Γ_G/ω_G ≈ 0.1 in the checkerboard limit.

Significance. If correct, the result would settle an open question about the survival of geometric collective modes in lattice topological phases and would provide a practical spectroscopic probe for FCIs. The numerical work is extensive and carefully cross-checked: full ED and pED are complemented by MPS/TDVP with bond-dimension and evolution-time convergence tests; twisted-boundary-condition averaging is used; and the dependence on the graviton operator parameters is explored in Appendix F. The analytic connection between the quadrupolar density operator and the continuum stress tensor in the LL limit (Eqs. 22–25) is a clean and useful contribution. The chiral spectral response as a phase witness (Fig. 9) is also a valuable observation. However, the central claims—that the FCI peak is the genuine metric graviton and that it remains long-lived in the thermodynamic limit—rest on assumptions that the authors themselves flag but do not fully resolve.

major comments (3)

[Sec. II C, Eq. (14); Sec. IV B, Fig. 6] The identification of the CB spectral peak as the chiral graviton depends entirely on O_nn (Eq. 14) with the hand-chosen f_G(r)=1/r and r_G=2√2. The analytic equivalence of O_nn to the continuum stress tensor is derived only in the LL limit (Eqs. 22–25). Away from that limit there is no independent lattice definition of the emergent metric or of the graviton, as the paper itself states in Sec. II ('no consensus has been reached') and Sec. V (emergent-metric theory left to future work). The comparison between O_s and O_nn (Eq. 29, Fig. 3) is a comparison between two operators both constructed to flow to the same continuum operator; it does not constitute independent validation at finite flux. Therefore the adiabatic continuity of the peak along R demonstrates continuity of some quadrupolar density excitation, not necessarily that this excitation is the metric graviton. To support the abst
[Sec. IV C, Fig. 7(d)] The claim of a long-lived mode in the FCI limit rests on the 1/N extrapolation of Γ_G/ω_G shown in Fig. 7(d). The data are limited to N=6,8,10,12 for the CB point and N=6,8,10 for HH*, and show pronounced oscillations with no clear convergence. The authors themselves state in Sec. IV C that 'we cannot completely exclude the divergence of the decay rate at system sizes outside the range of current state-of-the-art numerical methods.' The extraction of Γ_G via Eq. (32) assumes a simple additive decay model Γ_tot = Γ_G + η, which is not derived; the chosen η* = 0.02 for CB is ad hoc, and Eq. (33) only samples a factor of two in η. Given that 'long-lived' is a central claim, this extrapolation is not sufficiently controlled. The authors should either provide a more systematic scaling analysis (e.g., larger N, a specific scaling ansatz, or a collapse of Γ_tot(η) for all N), or soften the clai
[Sec. II B, Eq. (13); App. A] The lattice stress tensor O_s is derived in the limit V→∞ (nearest-neighbor hard-core constraint) and for nearest-neighbor interactions only (Sec. II B, App. A). The simulations, however, use finite V=2 and finite-range interactions V(r)=1/r up to r_c=2 (Sec. III A, Fig. 2). No argument is given that the operator expression in Eq. (13) remains the stress tensor away from the constrained limit. The numerical similarity between O_s and O_nn at n_φ=1/4 (Fig. 3) suggests some robustness, but the derivation gap means the interpretation of O_s as 'the lattice stress tensor' at the simulated parameters is an assumption. The authors should either extend the derivation to finite V or explicitly state and justify the extrapolation from the hard-core limit.

minor comments (6)

[Abstract and Sec. I] The bullet list in the introduction repeats the abstract almost verbatim; some redundancy could be removed.
[Sec. II C, Eq. (17)] The projected density operator expression appears typographically garbled: 'e − iq 2 z∗ j − iq∗ 2 z' is hard to parse. Please use standard notation such as e^{-i(q/2) z_j^* - i(q^*/2) z_j}.
[Sec. III A, Fig. 2 caption] The caption says 'N=4 for all panels' but N is also used for the Hilbert-space dimension in the text ('N ∼ 2·10^4'). Please use distinct symbols (e.g., N_p for particle number, dim for Hilbert-space dimension).
[Sec. III A, Eq. (29)] In the definition of the overlap distance, the state |ψ_O> is written with O^+ and O^-; for the negative-chirality overlap, it should be made explicit which combination of chiralities is used (presumably O^+ acting on the ground state to create the negative-chirality mode).
[Sec. IV A, Eq. (36)] The notation t, t', t'', t''' is defined in the text but the relation to the hoppings in Eq. (36) is not fully explicit; a short clarifying sentence would help.
[Appendix F, Fig. 21] The caption says 'R=1' and 'R=0' for the Harper–Hofstadter and checkerboard points, respectively, but in the main text R=0 is HH* and R=1 is CB. Please check the labeling in the appendix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central adiabatic-connection claim is carried by an explicit LL-limit calibration of the operator plus a numerical continuity argument; remaining caveats are identification risks, not definitional loops.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is largely self-contained and does not reduce its central claim to its inputs. The lattice stress tensor O_s is derived directly from the Heisenberg equation and Ward identity (Sec. II B, App. A), not merely imported from prior work. The quadrupolar operator O_nn (Eq. 14) is analytically shown to flow to the continuum stress-tensor response in the Landau-level limit (Eqs. 22-25), with the fermionic leading term identified as the V1 pseudopotential contribution. The FQH side is therefore calibrated by an explicit calculation, not by definition. The FCI identification is then carried by the adiabatic-continuity argument in Sec. IV B: the spectral peak is tracked continuously from the calibrated HH* limit (R=0) to the checkerboard FCI limit (R=1), with the band gap preserved along the path. This is a genuine numerical output, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The lifetime analysis similarly extracts Gamma_G from the measured FWHM via Gamma_tot = eta + Gamma_G and extrapolates in 1/N; while this involves a model for the line shape, it is an observable extraction rather than a self-referential construction. The paper itself flags the main limitation: Sec. II states 'no consensus has been reached' on graviton operators in FCIs, Sec. III A states the density operator's 'justification ... is also clear only in the LL limit', Sec. IV C admits 'we cannot completely exclude the divergence of the decay rate' at larger sizes, and Sec. V defers a direct emergent-metric theory to future work. These are acknowledged correctness/identification risks (the CB peak could in principle be a different neutral mode), but they are not circularity: the operator's validity is not assumed at the FCI point, it is transported there by an explicit adiabatic path after being verified in the continuum limit. The self-citations (Refs. [24] and [50]) are used to motivate the operator construction and the stress-tensor procedure, but the present paper reproduces the derivations and adds the analytic LL-limit equivalence, so the self-citations are not load-bearing. Overall, the central claim has independent numerical and analytic grounding; the residual concern is about operator identity at the FCI point, which the paper explicitly leaves for future effective-theory work.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim depends on several modeling choices: the operator form, the finite-range interaction, the lifetime-extraction broadening, and the assumption that the single-particle interpolation is many-body adiabatic. None are fitted to external data, but they are chosen by hand and their validity is established only indirectly.

free parameters (3)

eta* (lifetime-extraction broadening) = 0.16 n_phi (HH), 0.02 (CB), 0.01V (interaction scans)
Hand-chosen spectral broadening subtracted in Eq. (32) to extract the intrinsic decay rate Gamma_G; the extracted Gamma_G values and their error bars (Eq. 33) depend on this choice.
Quadrupolar operator weight f_G(r)=1/r^alpha, alpha=1, cutoff r_G=2*sqrt(2)
Modeling choice in Eq. (14). Appendix F shows the negative-chirality peak is robust over alpha in [-2,8], so this is not fitted to data, but it is still a hand-chosen probe whose physical interpretation as the graviton is assumed.
Interaction range r_c=2
Finite-range interaction f(r)=1/r for r<r_c in Eq. (37); chosen to produce a V1-like interaction on the checkerboard sublattice, not derived from first principles.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Low-flux Harper-Hofstadter model reproduces continuum Landau-level physics (psi(r) ~ c_i/a0, m=1/(2t a0^2))
Used at the start of Sec. II A to define the continuum limit in which the stress-tensor derivation and operator equivalence are performed.
ad hoc to paper The lattice stress tensor derived under V->infinity nearest-neighbor hard-core constraints remains a valid probe at finite V and for finite-range V(r)=1/r interactions
Eqs. (11)-(13) and App. A are derived in strong-coupling and near-continuum limits, but applied at V=2 across the interpolation; numerical ED/MPS checks are used as justification.
ad hoc to paper The quadrupolar density operator O_nn (Eq. 14) with f_G=1/r, r_G=2*sqrt(2) captures the chiral graviton in generic Chern bands
Equivalence to the continuum stress tensor is proven only for n_phi->0 (Eqs. 22-25); the FCI extension is assumed and tested only indirectly via the adiabatic path and Appendix F.
domain assumption The single-particle interpolation H0(R)=R H0,cb+(1-R)H0,hh is adiabatic in the many-body sense, i.e., the nu=1/3 state remains an FCI along R
Band gap and Chern number are preserved (Fig. 5), but no ground-state overlap or many-body topological order parameter along the path is provided; spectral continuity is used as evidence.
domain assumption The two-magnetoroton continuum onset is estimated as 2 times the first excited state in the ground-state momentum sector
Used in Figs. 6-7 and App. G to show the graviton peak lies inside the continuum; this is a heuristic energy scale, not a direct two-particle calculation.
domain assumption DMRG/TDVP with bond dimensions up to 2700 (DMRG) and up to 600 (TDVP) provides converged ground states and time-dependent spectral functions
Convergence with bond dimension and evolution time is documented in App. D, but no formal error bounds are given.

invented entities (1)

No new physical entities introduced
purpose: The lattice stress tensor and quadrupolar density operators are constructed measurement probes built from existing degrees of freedom, not new particles or forces.
The paper does not postulate new particles, mediators, or conserved quantities; it defines operators and analyzes their spectral functions.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral Graviton Modes in Fermionic Fractional Chern Insulators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MGDZD4DP

@misc{pith2026260105196,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral Graviton Modes in Fermionic Fractional Chern Insulators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MGDZD4DP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.05196}
}

read the original abstract

Chiral graviton modes are hallmark collective excitations of Fractional Quantum Hall (FQH) liquids. However, their existence on the lattice, where continuum symmetries that protect them from decay are lost, is still an open and urgent question, especially considering the recent advances in the realization of Fractional Chern Insulators (FCI) in transition metal dichalcogenides and rhombohedral pentalayer graphene. Here we present a comprehensive theoretical and numerical study of graviton-modes in fermionic FCI, and thoroughly demonstrate their existence. We first derive a lattice stress tensor operator in the context of the fermionic Harper-Hofstadter(HH) model which captures the graviton in the flat band limit. Importantly, we discover that such lattice stress-tensor operators are deeply connected to lattice quadrupolar density correlators, readily generalizable to generic Chern bands. We then explicitly show the adiabatic connection between FQH and FCI chiral graviton modes by interpolating from a low flux HH model to a Checkerboard lattice model that hosts a topological flat band. In particular, using state-of-the-art matrix product state and exact diagonalization simulations, we provide strong evidence that chiral graviton modes are long-lived excitations in FCIs despite the lack of continuous symmetries and the scattering with a two-magnetoroton continuum. By means of a careful finite-size analysis, we show that the lattice generates a finite but small intrinsic decay rate for the graviton mode. We discuss the relevance of our results for the exploration of graviton modes in FCI phases realized in solid state settings, as well as cold atom experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.05196 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (16 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: (c), we show the 1/N dependence of the graviton energy ωG and in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. Geometric constraint for ¯c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11. Relevant commutators that will contribute to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12. Square lattice Hofstadter model with 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: FIG. 13. Interpolation between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png]

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: FIG. 14. Schematic figure of the cylinder geometry we use [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png]

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: FIG. 16. Graviton spectrum calculated at different bond di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_16.png]

**Figure 17.** Figure 17: FIG. 17. Finite size scaling of the graviton spectrum with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_17.png]

**Figure 19.** Figure 19: FIG. 19. Graviton spectrum for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_19.png]

**Figure 20.** Figure 20: FIG. 20. Projected ED graviton spectra at different system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_20.png]

**Figure 22.** Figure 22: FIG. 22. (a) and (b). Density of states at the CB and HH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_22.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Chiral Graviton Modes in Non-Abelian lattice Fractional Quantum Hall states
cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

Chiral graviton modes are shown to exist as long-lived excitations in non-Abelian lattice fractional quantum Hall states, detectable in small cold-atom droplets via geometric quenches.
Collective excitations in chiral spin liquid: chiral roton and long-wavelength nematic mode
cond-mat.str-el 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

Numerical calculations reveal a chiral p-wave roton mode at finite momentum and a d-wave nematic mode at zero momentum in the SU(2) symmetric chiral spin liquid phase of the J1-J2-Jχ model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[24]

Lu, H.-Q

H. Lu, H.-Q. Wu, B.-B. Chen, and Z. Y. Meng, Contin- uous transition and gapless roton inside fractional quan- tum anomalous Hall states, Newton , 100300 (2025)

2025
[1]

Tang, J.-W

E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen, High-Temperature Fractional Quantum Hall States, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236802 (2011)

2011
[2]

andt ′′′ =−1/(2 + 2 √
[3]

Many-body paradigm in quantum moir´ e material research

[18]. These choices of tight-binding parameters realize the adiabatic path where the lowest band evolves from a LL-like band to a generic Chern band, as shown in Fig. 5 (c) and (d). Importantly, the phasesϕ i,j andϕ I,J give a non-trivial topological nature to the band structure. In order to interpolate to CB lattice with 0 net flux,−2πflux is threaded in...
[4]

= 1 rα andf G(r >2 √
[5]

= 0 (F1) Note that for theR= 0 case, ther= 2 √ 2 distance corresponds to the next nearest neighbor, while for the R= 1 it is the 5 th nearest neighbor. In Fig. 21 we show a sample of band-projected ED results obtained for a small system ofN= 6 particles. In particular, we explore a wide range of values ofα, from negative to positive. Noteα= 1 has been use...
[6]

D. Xiao, W. Zhu, Y. Ran, N. Nagaosa, and S. Okamoto, Interface engineering of quantum Hall effects in digital transition metal oxide heterostructures, Nature Commu- nications2, 596 (2011)

2011
[8]

Neupert, L

T. Neupert, L. Santos, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Frac- tional Quantum Hall States at Zero Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236804 (2011)

2011

Show all 87 references

[10]

Regnault and B

N. Regnault and B. A. Bernevig, Fractional Chern Insu- lator, Phys. Rev. X1, 021014 (2011)

2011
[11]

H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, L. Fu, W. Yao, C.- Z. Chang, D. Cobden, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous Hall effect, Nature 622, 74 (2023)

2023
[12]

Y.-H. Wu, J. K. Jain, and K. Sun, Adiabatic continu- ity between Hofstadter and Chern insulator states, Phys. Rev. B86, 165129 (2012)

2012
[13]

K. Sun, Z. Gu, H. Katsura, and S. Das Sarma, Nearly Flatbands with Nontrivial Topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 236803 (2011)

2011
[14]

We note in this paper the FQAH and FCI are synonyms
[15]

J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states in twisted MoTe2, Nature622, 63 (2023)

2023
[16]

J. Wang, J. Cano, A. J. Millis, Z. Liu, and B. Yang, Exact Landau Level Description of Geometry and Interaction in a Flatband, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 246403 (2021)

2021
[17]

Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn¨ uppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evidence of fractional Chern insulator in moir´ e MoTe2, Nature622, 69 (2023)

2023
[18]

F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y. Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, J. Jia, Z. Shi, S. Jiang, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, and T. Li, Observation of In- teger and Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall Effects in Twisted Bilayer MoTe2, Phys. Rev. X13, 031037 (2023)

2023
[19]

Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Fractional quantum anomalous Hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature626, 759 (2024)

2024
[20]

Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Phys

R. Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B90, 165139 (2014)

2014
[21]

X. Shen, C. Wang, X. Hu, R. Guo, H. Yao, C. Wang, W. Duan, and Y. Xu, Magnetorotons in Moir´ e Fractional Chern Insulators, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2412.01211 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[22]

P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Vor- texability: A unifying criterion for ideal fractional Chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B108, 205144 (2023)

2023
[23]

Lu, B.-B

H. Lu, B.-B. Chen, H.-Q. Wu, K. Sun, and Z. Y. Meng, Thermodynamic Response and Neutral Excitations in In- teger and Fractional Quantum Anomalous Hall States Emerging from Correlated Flat Bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236502 (2024)

2024
[25]

Lu, H.-Q

H. Lu, H.-Q. Wu, B.-B. Chen, K. Sun, and Z. Y. Meng, Interaction-driven Roton Condensation in C = 2/3 Frac- tional Quantum Anomalous Hall State, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2403.03258 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[26]

F. D. M. Haldane, Geometrical Description of the Frac- tional Quantum Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 116801 (2011)

2011
[27]

Repellin, T

C. Repellin, T. Neupert, Z. Papi´ c, and N. Regnault, Single-mode approximation for fractional Chern insula- tors and the fractional quantum Hall effect on the torus, Phys. Rev. B90, 045114 (2014)

2014
[28]

X.-Y. Dong, A. G. Grushin, J. Motruk, and F. Pollmann, Charge Excitation Dynamics in Bosonic Fractional Chern Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086401 (2018)

2018
[29]

M. Long, H. Lu, H.-Q. Wu, and Z. Y. Meng, Spectra of magnetoroton and chiral graviton modes of the fractional Chern insulator, Physical Review B113, Phys. Rev. B 113, L041108 (2026)

2026
[30]

F. D. M. Haldane, ”Hall viscosity” and intrinsic metric of incompressible fractional Hall fluids, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.0906.1854 (2009)

2009 doi arXiv
[31]

Z. Liu, A. Gromov, and Z. Papi´ c, Geometric quench and nonequilibrium dynamics of fractional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B98, 155140 (2018). 23

2018
[32]

B. Yang, Z. Papi´ c, E. H. Rezayi, R. N. Bhatt, and F. D. M. Haldane, Band mass anisotropy and the in- trinsic metric of fractional quantum Hall systems, Phys. Rev. B85, 165318 (2012)

2012
[33]

Ippoliti, R

M. Ippoliti, R. N. Bhatt, and F. D. M. Haldane, Geome- try of flux attachment in anisotropic fractional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B98, 085101 (2018)

2018
[34]

Golkar, D

S. Golkar, D. X. Nguyen, and D. T. Son, Spectral sum rules and magneto-roton as emergent graviton in frac- tional quantum Hall effect, J. High Energy Phys. 1 (2016) 1–15

2016
[35]

Gromov and D

A. Gromov and D. T. Son, Bimetric Theory of Fractional Quantum Hall States, Phys. Rev. X7, 041032 (2017)

2017
[36]

Y. Liu, T. Zhao, and T. Xiang, Resolving geometric ex- citations of fractional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B 110, 195137 (2024)

2024
[37]

S.-F. Liou, F. D. M. Haldane, K. Yang, and E. H. Rezayi, Chiral Gravitons in Fractional Quantum Hall Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 146801 (2019)

2019
[38]

D. X. Nguyen, F. D. M. Haldane, E. H. Rezayi, D. T. Son, and K. Yang, Multiple Magnetorotons and Spectral Sum Rules in Fractional Quantum Hall Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 246402 (2022)

2022
[39]

Kumar and F

P. Kumar and F. D. M. Haldane, Neutral excitations of quantum Hall states: A density matrix renormalization group study, Phys. Rev. B106, 075116 (2022)

2022
[40]

Yang, Acoustic wave absorption as a probe of dy- namical geometrical response of fractional quantum Hall liquids, Phys

K. Yang, Acoustic wave absorption as a probe of dy- namical geometrical response of fractional quantum Hall liquids, Phys. Rev. B93, 161302 (2016)

2016
[41]

Yuzhu and Y

W. Yuzhu and Y. Bo, Geometric fluctuation of confor- mal Hilbert spaces and multiple graviton modes in frac- tional quantum Hall effect, Nature Communications14, 10.1038/s41467-023-38036-0 (2023)

2023 doi
[43]

Yang, Z.-X

B. Yang, Z.-X. Hu, Z. Papi´ c, and F. D. M. Haldane, Model Wave Functions for the Collective Modes and the Magnetoroton Theory of the Fractional Quantum Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 256807 (2012)

2012
[44]

D. X. Nguyen and D. T. Son, Dirac composite fermion theory of general Jain sequences, Physical Review Re- search3, 10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033217 (2021)

2021 doi
[46]

Liang, Z

J. Liang, Z. Liu, Z. Yang, Y. Huang, U. Wurstbauer, C. R. Dean, K. W. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, L. Du, and A. Pinczuk, Evidence for chiral graviton modes in frac- tional quantum Hall liquids, Nature628, 78 (2024)

2024
[48]

D. X. Nguyen, D. T. Son, and C. Wu, Low- est Landau Level Stress Tensor and Structure Fac- tor of Trial Quantum Hall Wave Functions, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.1411.3316 (2014)

2014 doi arXiv
[49]

D. X. Nguyen and D. T. Son, Probing the spin struc- ture of the fractional quantum Hall magnetoroton with polarized Raman scattering, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023040 (2021)

2021
[50]

Kumar and F

P. Kumar and F. D. M. Haldane, A numerical study of bounds in the correlations of fractional quantum Hall states, SciPost Phys.16, 117 (2024)

2024
[51]

S. M. Girvin, A. H. MacDonald, and P. M. Platzman, Magneto-roton theory of collective excitations in the frac- tional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B33, 2481 (1986)

1986
[52]

L´ eonard, S

J. L´ eonard, S. Kim, J. Kwan, P. Segura, F. Grusdt, C. Repellin, N. Goldman, and M. Greiner, Realization of a fractional quantum Hall state with ultracold atoms, Nature619, 495 (2023)

2023
[53]

P. Lunt, P. Hill, J. Reiter, P. M. Preiss, M. Ga lka, and S. Jochim, Realization of a Laughlin State of Two Rapidly Rotating Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 253401 (2024)

2024
[54]

Wang, F.-M

C. Wang, F.-M. Liu, M.-C. Chen, H. Chen, X.-H. Zhao, C. Ying, Z.-X. Shang, J.-W. Wang, Y.-H. Huo, C.-Z. Peng, X. Zhu, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Realization of fractional quantum Hall state with interacting photons, Science384, 579 (2024)

2024
[55]

H. B. Xavier, Z. Bacciconi, T. Chanda, D. T. Son, and M. Dalmonte, Chiral Graviton Modes on the Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 196501 (2025)

2025
[56]

Aidelsburger, M

M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes, and I. Bloch, Realization of the Hofstadter Hamiltonian with Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 185301 (2013)

2013
[57]

Yang, Quantum geometric fluctuations in fractional quantum Hall fluids, Physical Review B 10.1103/rxy9- 4dr8 (2025)

B. Yang, Quantum geometric fluctuations in fractional quantum Hall fluids, Physical Review B 10.1103/rxy9- 4dr8 (2025)

2025 doi
[58]

Y. Wang, J. Huxford, D. X. Nguyen, G. Ji, Y. B. Kim, and B. Yang, Dynamics and lifetime of geometric excita- tions in moir´ e systems, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2502.02640 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[59]

D. R. Hofstadter, Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B14, 2239 (1976)

1976
[60]

Jaksch and P

D. Jaksch and P. Zoller, Creation of effective magnetic fields in optical lattices: the Hofstadter butterfly forcold neutral atoms, New J. Phys.5, 56 (2003)

2003
[61]

Gerster, M

M. Gerster, M. Rizzi, P. Silvi, M. Dalmonte, and S. Mon- tangero, Fractional quantum Hall effect in the interacting Hofstadter model via tensor networks, Phys. Rev. B96, 195123 (2017)

2017
[62]

Mancini, G

M. Mancini, G. Pagano, G. Cappellini, L. Livi, M. Rider, J. Catani, C. Sias, P. Zoller, M. Inguscio, M. Dalmonte, and L. Fallani, Observation of chiral edge states with neutral fermions in synthetic Hall ribbons, Science349, 1510 (2015)

2015
[63]

Hafezi, A

M. Hafezi, A. S. Sørensen, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Fractional quantum Hall effect in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A76, 023613 (2007)

2007
[64]

Bauer, T

D. Bauer, T. S. Jackson, and R. Roy, Quantum geometry and stability of the fractional quantum Hall effect in the Hofstadter model, Physical Review B93, 10.1103/phys- revb.93.235133 (2016)

2016 doi
[65]

Motruk, M

J. Motruk, M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, and F. Poll- mann, Density matrix renormalization group on a cylin- der in mixed real and momentum space, Physical Review B93, 10.1103/physrevb.93.155139 (2016)

2016 doi
[66]

S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2863 (1992)

1992
[67]

Wang, Y.-K

Y. Wang, Y.-K. Wu, Y. Jiang, M.-L. Cai, B.-W. Li, Q.- X. Mei, B.-X. Qi, Z.-C. Zhou, and L.-M. Duan, Realizing Synthetic Dimensions and Artificial Magnetic Flux in a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 130601 (2024)

2024
[68]

R.-Z. Qiu, F. D. M. Haldane, X. Wan, K. Yang, and S. Yi, Model anisotropic quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B85, 115308 (2012)

2012
[69]

Pavarini, E

E. Pavarini, E. Koch, and S. Zhang, Many-Body Methods for Real Materials : Autumn School organized by the Institute for Advanced Simulation at Forschungszentrum J¨ ulich, 16 - 20 September 2019 : Lecture Notes of the Autumn School on Correlated Electrons 2019, Autumn School on...

2019
[70]

Weiße, G

A. Weiße, G. Wellein, A. Alvermann, and H. Fehske, The kernel polynomial method, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 275 24 (2006)

2006
[71]

Sheng, Z.-C

D. Sheng, Z.-C. Gu, K. Sun, and L. Sheng, Fractional quantum Hall effect in the absence of Landau levels, Na- ture Communications2, 389 (2011)

2011
[72]

S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. B48, 10345 (1993)

1993
[73]

Haegeman, J

J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Piˇ zorn, H. Ver- schelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-Dependent Variational Principle for Quantum Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 070601 (2011)

2011
[74]

Haegeman, C

J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimiza- tion with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B94, 165116 (2016)

2016
[75]

To the best of our knowledge, apart from the experimen- tally reportedν= 1/3 graviton peak width in continuum LLL of about 2Γ G ∼30µeVwithω G ∼0.65 meV[46], no other estimate is currently available in the literature
[76]

We thank Bo Yang for pointing out this perspective to us
[77]

Impertro, S

A. Impertro, S. Huh, S. Karch, J. F. Wienand, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Realization of strongly-interacting Meissner phases in large bosonic flux ladders, arXiv 10.48550/arXiv.2412.09481 (2024)

2024 doi
[78]

Bacciconi, H

Z. Bacciconi, H. B. Xavier, I. Carusotto, T. Chanda, and M. Dalmonte, Theory of Fractional Quantum Hall Liq- uids Coupled to Quantum Light and Emergent Graviton- Polaritons, Phys. Rev. X15, 021027 (2025)

2025
[79]

G. M. Andolina, M. Ceccanti, B. Turini, R. Riolo, M. Polini, M. Schir´ o, and F. H. L. Koppens, Quan- tum Electrodynamics of graphene Landau levels in a deep-subwavelength hyperbolic phonon polariton cavity, arXiv:2501.04133

arXiv
[80]

Appugliese, J

F. Appugliese, J. Enkner, G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, M. Beck, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Breakdown of topological protection by cav- ity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect, Sci- ence375, 1030 (2022)

2022
[81]

A. P. Reddy, N. Paul, A. Abouelkomsan, and L. Fu, Non-Abelian Fractionalization in Topological Minibands, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 166503 (2024)

2024
[82]

A. C. Balram, Z. Liu, A. Gromov, and Z. Papi´ c, Very- High-Energy Collective States of Partons in Fractional Quantum Hall Liquids, Phys. Rev. X12, 021008 (2022)

2022
[83]

F. A. Palm, M. Buser, J. L´ eonard, M. Aidelsburger, U. Schollw¨ ock, and F. Grusdt, Bosonic Pfaffian state in the Hofstadter-Bose-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B103, L161101 (2021)

2021
[84]

Boesl, R

J. Boesl, R. Dilip, F. Pollmann, and M. Knap, Character- izing fractional topological phases of lattice bosons near the first Mott lobe, Phys. Rev. B105, 075135 (2022)

2022
[85]

Chen, W.-W

F. Chen, W.-W. Luo, W. Zhu, and D. N. Sheng, Robust non-Abelian even-denominator fractional Chern insula- tor in twisted bilayer MoTe2, Nature Communications 16, 2115 (2025)

2025
[86]

Beijing PARATERA Tech CO.,Ltd
[87]

C.-E. Ahn, W. Lee, K. Yananose, Y. Kim, and G. Y. Cho, Non-Abelian fractional quantum anomalous Hall states and first Landau level physics of the second moir´ e band of twisted bilayer MoTe 2, Phys. Rev. B110, L161109 (2024)

2024
[88]

Herviou and F

L. Herviou and F. Mila, Numerical investigation of the structure factors of the Read-Rezayi series, Physical Re- view B110, 045143 (2024)

2024
[89]

S. Pu, A. C. Balram, J. Taylor, E. Fradkin, and Z. Papi´ c, Microscopic Model for Fractional Quantum Hall Nemat- ics, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236503 (2024)

2024
[90]

HPC2021, Information Technology Services, The Univer- sity of Hong Kong
[92]

TensorKit,https://jutho.github.io/TensorKit.jl/ stable/, accessed: December 21, 2024

2024
[300]

We also examine the graviton spec- trum obtained at different bond dimensions to check the convergence

For example, the difference 1− ⟨ψD=300|ψD=1200⟩is smaller than 10 −4. We also examine the graviton spec- trum obtained at different bond dimensions to check the convergence. In Fig. 16, we display the graviton spec- trum at both chiralities obtained at different bond di- mensi...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [24]

Lu, H.-Q

H. Lu, H.-Q. Wu, B.-B. Chen, and Z. Y. Meng, Contin- uous transition and gapless roton inside fractional quan- tum anomalous Hall states, Newton , 100300 (2025)

2025

[2] [1]

Tang, J.-W

E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen, High-Temperature Fractional Quantum Hall States, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236802 (2011)

2011

[3] [2]

andt ′′′ =−1/(2 + 2 √

[4] [3]

Many-body paradigm in quantum moir´ e material research

[18]. These choices of tight-binding parameters realize the adiabatic path where the lowest band evolves from a LL-like band to a generic Chern band, as shown in Fig. 5 (c) and (d). Importantly, the phasesϕ i,j andϕ I,J give a non-trivial topological nature to the band structure. In order to interpolate to CB lattice with 0 net flux,−2πflux is threaded in...

[5] [4]

= 1 rα andf G(r >2 √

[6] [5]

= 0 (F1) Note that for theR= 0 case, ther= 2 √ 2 distance corresponds to the next nearest neighbor, while for the R= 1 it is the 5 th nearest neighbor. In Fig. 21 we show a sample of band-projected ED results obtained for a small system ofN= 6 particles. In particular, we explore a wide range of values ofα, from negative to positive. Noteα= 1 has been use...

[7] [6]

D. Xiao, W. Zhu, Y. Ran, N. Nagaosa, and S. Okamoto, Interface engineering of quantum Hall effects in digital transition metal oxide heterostructures, Nature Commu- nications2, 596 (2011)

2011

[8] [8]

Neupert, L

T. Neupert, L. Santos, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, Frac- tional Quantum Hall States at Zero Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 236804 (2011)

2011