Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Adaptive behaviors neutralize bistable explosive transitions in higher-order contagion

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read When individuals adapt their behavior to perceived infection risk, the explosive, bistable transition characteristic of higher-order group contagion can be completely neutralized, leaving a continuous phase transition with the same epidemic

desk verdict A solid study of adaptive risk perception in higher-order contagion, with a clean pairwise threshold result and a conditional higher-order suppression; the 'transform to pairwise' claim outruns the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.05801 v1 pith:SY7B4IMV submitted 2026-01-09 physics.soc-ph cs.SInlin.AO

classification physics.soc-phcs.SInlin.AO MSC 05C8292D30 PACS 89.75.Hc
keywords higher-ordercontagionhypergraphsadaptivebehaviorbistabilitydiscontinuousphasetransitionSISepidemicmodelriskperceptionmean-fieldapproximation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks what happens when people adjust their behavior based on perceived infection risk during a contagion that spreads through group interactions as well as pairwise contacts. In a standard pairwise (link-based) epidemic model, such adaptive behaviors change the endemic prevalence but leave the continuous phase transition and its threshold untouched. In contrast, for a higher-order (group-based) contagion process—where infection probability is nonlinear in the number of infected group members—risk-driven adaptation shrinks the bistability region and the size of the discontinuous jump, and can eliminate both entirely. The central result is that a group-aware strategy, which makes an individual reduce exposure whenever a group they belong to contains a risky number of infected members, converts the higher-order process into an effectively pairwise one below the pairwise threshold, restoring a continuous transition at the pairwise critical rate. A sympathetic reader would care because it identifies a concrete mechanism—suppressing groups with more than one infected member—by which behavioral flexibility can defend against explosive outbreak dynamics.

What carries the argument

The central object is χ_e^{i_e>1}, the probability (in the asymptotic stationary state) that a hyperedge containing at least one susceptible node has more than one infected member; this quantity controls how often the nonlinear, reinforcement-driven group contagion events occur. The argument runs through individual-based mean-field (IBMF) equations for the infection probabilities P_i(t), in which the awareness functions f_i^{nn}(t) and f_i^{ng}(t) enter as exponential reductions of the per-node transmission/susceptibility parameters λ_i. Two analytic results carry the weight: (i) a linear-stability analysis of the absorbing state shows that adaptive strategies leave the Jacobian unchanged at

What would settle it

Simulate the ng strategy on a hypergraph with strong within-group infection-state correlations (e.g., by adding a small infection bias to group members of infected individuals) and measure, at r < r_C^{NAD,p}, the stationary probability that a hyperedge with a susceptible node contains two or more infected individuals; if this probability is clearly above zero while the phase diagram still shows a discontinuous jump, the conversion-to-pairwise mechanism is not universal. Equivalently, look for any empirical dataset where the ng strategy leaves a nonzero bistability width.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that for an SIS process on a hypergraph with nonlinear group reinforcement (infection probability within a hyperedge scaling as the ν-th power of average infected-node transmission rates), the discontinuous phase transition and bistable regime are driven by hyperedges containing more than one infected individual. Adaptive behaviors reduce transmission rates of both susceptible and infected individuals locally, via λ_i(t)=λ_0 e^{-f_i(t)}, with awareness f_i based either on the number of infectious neighbors (nn) or the number of 'infectious groups' perceived by i (ng, where a group counts as infectious if its infected members exceed a threshold fraction θ of the group).

Load-bearing premise

The proof that the higher-order process becomes pairwise near criticality assumes that a hyperedge containing a susceptible node has at most one infected member (χ_e^{i_e>1}≈0); this is checked numerically and via mean-field integration rather than proven rigorously, and if correlations kept multi-infected groups common under adaptation, the suppression could be incomplete.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In pairwise SIS contagion, adaptive behaviors based on local risk perception do not shift or alter the continuous epidemic phase transition; they only reduce the endemic prevalence.
  • In higher-order contagion, both the 'infectious neighbors' (nn) and 'infectious groups' (ng) strategies shrink the bistability region; the ng strategy can eliminate it entirely, making the transition continuous at the pairwise threshold r_C = 1/Λ_w.
  • The upper boundary of the bistability region is invariant under these adaptive strategies because the stability of the disease-free state is determined solely by pairwise interactions.
  • The suppression of the transition is mediated by the reduction of the probability χ_e^{i_e>1} that a group containing a susceptible node has multiple infected members; when this probability vanishes below the pairwise threshold, higher-order effects are replaced by pairwise ones.
  • These findings hold across several empirical face-to-face interaction hypergraphs and a range of synthetic hypergraphs, including ones with tunable hyperdegree heterogeneity and hyperedge overlap.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to track χ_e^{i_e>1} in real-time during an outbreak: the prediction is that under an effective group-aware strategy, the population should rarely (if ever) observe groups containing more than one infected member while prevalence is below the pairwise critical value.
  • The mechanism suggests a design principle for intervention: interventions that specifically break up 'multi-infection groups' (e.g., capping group sizes, discouraging mixing within groups when one member is infected) may convert explosive dynamics into smooth ones even without global awareness.
  • If correlations between infection states within hyperedges persist (e.g., due to temporal clustering in empirical contact patterns), the χ≈0 assumption could fail; one could test this by time-resolved analysis of the hospital data in the regime where ng yields a continuous transition.
  • The result may transfer to other higher-order dynamical processes (opinion dynamics, adoption cascades) where nonlinear reinforcement drives bistability; behavioral adaptation based on group-level information could analogously suppress tipping cascades.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies SIS contagion on static hypergraphs with two risk-based adaptive strategies (nn and ng) that reduce node transmission/reception rates λ_i(t) when local infectious neighbors/groups are present. Using individual-based mean-field equations and Monte Carlo simulations on empirical and synthetic hypergraphs, the authors show: (i) for pairwise contagion, the adaptive strategies do not shift the epidemic threshold (Eq. 5), a result derived by linearization; (ii) for higher-order nonlinear contagion, adaptation shrinks the bistability region and can, on the hospital dataset, completely eliminate it—making the transition continuous at the pairwise threshold. The mechanism is quantified by χ_e^{i_e>1}, the probability that a hyperedge with a susceptible node contains >1 infected; the Appendix gives a conditional reduction to pairwise dynamics when χ≈0. The SM shows the complete suppression is dataset-dependent, with some empirical hypergraphs retaining a finite bistable region under ng.

Significance. The paper's pairwise threshold equality is a clean, exact linearization result and is a useful reference for adaptive SIS models. The higher-order result—that local awareness can defuse the non-linear group contagion responsible for explosive transitions—is interesting and well-supported by the IBMF/simulation agreement on LH10. The χ diagnostic is a valuable tool for quantifying when higher-order effects are suppressed. The conditional analytical reduction (Eq. 23) is a strength, but its antecedent is only verified numerically for one dataset; the SM's explicit counterexamples mean the 'transforming into a pairwise one' language overstates the generality. With appropriate qualification the paper would be a solid contribution to the adaptive higher-order contagion literature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Results (discussion of Fig. 2b and Fig. 3c)] The abstract's 'effectively transforming a higher-order contagion process into a pairwise one' and the main text's 'Strikingly, the ng strategy completely neutralizes the bistability regime...' are stated without dataset qualification. SM Section II explicitly reports that 'for some datasets both nn and ng strategies completely suppresses the bistability region, while in other cases both lead to a still discontinuous transitions with a shrinked but still finite bistability.' Thus the ability of ng to make χ_e^{i_e>1}=0 for all r<r_C^{NAD,p} is not a general property of the strategy; it holds only for the hospital dataset shown. The 'transforming into a pairwise one' language should be made conditional, e.g., 'in cases where the strategy drives χ to zero,' and the abstract should be aligned with the SM's dataset-dependent outcome.
  2. [Appendix, 'From higher-order transition to a pairwise one' (Eq. 23)] The analytical reduction is a conditional statement: if χ_e^{i_e>1}≈0, then near r_C the higher-order mean-field equations reduce to the pairwise ones (Eqs. 23–26). The paper does not prove that the ng strategy realizes this condition; the only evidence is the IBMF integration and simulations for LH10 (Fig. 3c). Since the SM shows counterexamples on other empirical hypergraphs, the mechanism by which ng 'transforms' the process is incomplete. I ask the authors to either provide an analytical argument bounding χ under ng (e.g., via the linearized equations for the multi-infected probability) or to explicitly frame the pairwise equivalence as a dataset/strategy-dependent phenomenon rather than a property of ng.
  3. [Main text, paragraph after Fig. 3] The sentence 'for adaptive strategies efficient enough to make χ_e^{i_e>1}=0 ∀e for all r<r_C^{NAD,p}, such as the ng strategy' is contradicted by the SM's observation that ng does not always achieve this. Even though the main text focuses on LH10, the phrase 'such as the ng strategy' reads as a general claim. This should be reformulated to 'such as the ng strategy on the datasets considered here' or, more precisely, 'when the strategy succeeds in making χ=0.' Otherwise the reader is left with an internal inconsistency between the main text and the SM.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Contagion models, Eq. (4)] The definition of β_i^e(i_e,ν) contains garbled notation ('λ0iν e'). Please clarify the exponent structure and show explicitly how it reduces to the prefactor λ0 λ_i(t)(λ_j(t)/λ0)^ν used in Eq. (24) for i_e=1.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'adaptive mechanisms based on local (pairwise or group-based) risk perception impact only the endemic state, without affecting the epidemic phase transition' for pairwise contagion. This is a general statement, but only the nn and ng mechanisms are studied here; please qualify it to 'the mechanisms considered.'
  3. [SM Section II, Supp. Fig. 2] Supp. Fig. 2 uses θ=0 for the ng strategy, while the main text uses θ=0.3. The caption should explain this choice or explicitly state that the local-impact quantification is done at θ=0 for that figure.
  4. [General] Several important details and extensions are deferred to the companion paper [45], which is listed as 'In preparation.' Please indicate clearly which results in the present manuscript are self-contained, since the reader cannot access [45].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the pairwise-equivalence reduction is a conditional theorem, and the bistability suppression is demonstrated by direct simulation and IBMF integration; self-citations to companion [45] are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claim is not a fitted prediction or a definitional identity. The analytic 'transformation' of higher-order contagion into pairwise contagion is explicitly conditional: the Appendix states 'Let’s indeed assume that χ_e^{i_e>1} ∼ 0' and then derives Eq. (26) from Eq. (23). This is a valid conditional reduction, not a claim that the assumption follows by construction. The antecedent is instead verified by numerical integration of the IBMF equations and by simulations (Fig. 2b, Fig. 3c) for the hospital dataset. The equality of pairwise thresholds, r_NAD,p_C = r_nn,p_C = r_ng,p_C = 1/Λ_w (Eq. 5), follows from a standard linearization around the absorbing state (Eqs. 17–19), not from any fitted parameter. The paper’s self-citations to the companion work [45] are used for extended parameter sweeps, other θ values, and cost analyses; the load-bearing derivation here is self-contained. The main weakness is overgeneralization, not circularity: the SM itself notes that 'for some datasets both nn and ng strategies completely suppresses the bistability region, while in other cases both lead to a still discontinuous transitions with a shrinked but still finite bistability,' so the abstract’s unqualified 'effectively transforming a higher-order contagion process into a pairwise one' is stronger than the evidence. That is a correctness/robustness limitation, but the derivation chain does not reduce to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data; the only hand-chosen parameters are θ and ν. The central derivation rests on the IBMF approximation and on the numerically-verified condition that adaptive strategies suppress multi-infected hyperedges. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced; χ and ρ are observables, not entities.

free parameters (2)
  • θ = 0.3
    Alertness threshold in the ng group-based awareness strategy (Eq. 2). Chosen by hand; main text only uses θ=0.3, other values deferred to companion paper [45].
  • ν = 4
    Non-linearity exponent in the higher-order infection rate (Eq. 4). Set to 4 in main text (as in [14]); no sensitivity analysis in the main text, though the qualitative mechanism is argued to be robust.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The higher-order SIS contagion model with infection probability β_i^e(i_e,ν) adequately represents non-linear group contagion.
    Taken from St-Onge et al. [14]; the paper builds on this model without deriving it from microscopics. It is the substrate for the bistability that adaptivity later neutralizes.
  • domain assumption Adaptive behavior follows the exponential reduction λ_i(t) = λ0 e^{-f_i(t)}, with f chosen as number of infected neighbors or infectious groups normalized by mean degree/hyperdegree.
    This functional form is imported from prior adaptive-network literature (refs. [30,32,38]) and is not empirically fitted. The entire study is conditional on this 'mild adaptation' form (no topology change).
  • domain assumption The individual-based mean-field approximation neglects dynamical correlations between states of neighboring nodes but uses the full interaction structure.
    Standard IBMF assumption used to derive Eqs. (3)-(4); the paper validates it against Monte Carlo simulations for all presented cases.
  • standard math The absorbing state is stable iff the largest eigenvalue of the linearized Jacobian is negative; this determines the epidemic threshold.
    Linear stability analysis in the Appendix; standard result for SIS-like systems.
  • domain assumption The analytical reduction to pairwise dynamics near criticality assumes χ_e^{i_e>1} ≈ 0, a condition verified numerically for the strategies studied.
    The condition is verified by mean-field integration and simulations (Figs. 2-3); the proof of equivalence is conditional on it.
  • domain assumption Empirical face-to-face interaction datasets, preprocessed via clique promotion and thresholding, are representative substrates for studying contagion dynamics.
    The paper uses SocioPatterns hospital/school/conference data with standard preprocessing; robustness is checked across six datasets.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Adaptive behaviors neutralize bistable explosive transitions in higher-order contagion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SY7B4IMV

@misc{pith2026260105801,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Adaptive behaviors neutralize bistable explosive transitions in higher-order contagion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SY7B4IMV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.05801}
}
read the original abstract

During contagion phenomena, individuals perceiving a risk of infection commonly adapt their behavior and reduce their exposure. The effects of such adaptive mechanisms have been studied for processes in which pairwise interactions drive contagion. However, contagion and the perception of infection risk can also involve ("higher-order") group interactions, leading potentially to new phenomenology. How adaptive behavior resulting from risk perception affects higher-order processes remains an open question. Here, we consider the impact of several risk-based adaptive behaviors on pairwise and higher-order contagion processes, using numerical simulations and an analytical mean-field approach. For pairwise contagion, adaptive mechanisms based on local (pairwise or group-based) risk perception impact only the endemic state, without affecting the epidemic phase transition. For higher-order contagion processes, instead, the adaptivity defuses the impact of non-linear group interactions: this reduces or even completely suppresses the parameter range in which bistability is possible, effectively transforming a higher-order contagion process into a pairwise one.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.05801 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Higher-order adaptive behaviors outperform pairwise strategies in mitigating contagion dynamics

    physics.soc-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    On hypergraph SIS models, awareness strategies based on absolute, higher-order information reduce epidemic prevalence more and impose lower social cost than pairwise or relative strategies, by concentrating alert on h...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    & Vespignani, A

    Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M. & Vespignani, A. Dynami- cal processes on complex networks (Cambridge university press, 2008)

  2. [2]

    The contagion events involving the non-linear higher-order mechanism are thus sustained in this region

    In the NAD case, the average of this quantity over hyperedges of size m obeys ⟨χie>1 e ⟩m ∼ 1 for all m > 2 in the bistability region. The contagion events involving the non-linear higher-order mechanism are thus sustained in this region. In fact, the propa- gation is predominantly driven by group contagions, as measured by the fraction ρ of potential inf...

  3. [3]

    Indeed, we show in the Appendix how λi(t), Qe\i(ie, t) and ⟨λi(t)/λ0⟩ν ie can be analytically obtained from the probabilities Pj(t) of all nodes j

    and Eq.s ( 4) constitute two closed sets of N = |V| coupled non-linear differential equations. Indeed, we show in the Appendix how λi(t), Qe\i(ie, t) and ⟨λi(t)/λ0⟩ν ie can be analytically obtained from the probabilities Pj(t) of all nodes j. Results. We perform direct Monte-Carlo numerical simulations of the pairwise and higher-order contagion processes i...

  4. [4]

    & Vespignani, A

    Pastor-Satorras, R., Castellano, C., Van Mieghem, P. & Vespignani, A. Epidemic processes in complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 925–979 (2015)

  5. [5]

    & Ghosh, D

    Majhi, S., Perc, M. & Ghosh, D. Dynamics on higher- order networks: a review. J. R. Soc. Interface 19, 20220043 (2022)

  6. [6]

    Wang, W. et al. Epidemic spreading on higher-order net- works. Physics Reports 1056, 1–70 (2024)

  7. [7]

    Battiston, F. et al. The physics of higher-order interac- tions in complex systems. Nature Physics 17, 1093–1098 (2021)

  8. [8]

    Battiston, F. et al. Networks beyond pairwise interac- tions: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports 874, 1–92 (2020)

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    & Latora, V

    Iacopini, I., Petri, G., Barrat, A. & Latora, V. Simplicial models of social contagion. Nature Communications 10, 2485 (2019)

  2. [10]

    & Bick, C

    Kuehn, C. & Bick, C. A universal route to explosive phenomena. Science Advances 7, eabe3824 (2021)

  3. [11]

    Ferraz de Arruda, G., Petri, G., Rodriguez, P. M. & Moreno, Y. Multistability, intermittency, and hybrid transitions in social contagion models on hypergraphs. Nature Communications 14, 1375 (2023)

  4. [12]

    & Moreno, Y

    Ferraz de Arruda, G., Tizzani, M. & Moreno, Y. Phase transitions and stability of dynamical processes on hy- pergraphs. Communications Physics 4, 24 (2021)

  5. [13]

    Z., Bick, C

    Kiss, I. Z., Bick, C. & Simon, P. L. Decoding how higher- order network interactions shape contagion dynamics. Journal of Mathematical Biology 91, 29 (2025)

  6. [14]

    & G´ omez-Garde˜ nes, J

    Malizia, F., Lamata-Ot ´ ın, S., Frasca, M., Latora, V. & G´ omez-Garde˜ nes, J. Hyperedge overlap drives explosive transitions in systems with higher-order interactions. Na- ture Communications 16, 555 (2025)

  7. [15]

    & Kiss, I

    Malizia, F., Guzm´ an, A., Iacopini, I. & Kiss, I. Z. Disen - tangling the role of heterogeneity and hyperedge overlap in explosive contagion on higher-order networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 207401 (2025)

  8. [16]

    St-Onge, G. et al. Influential groups for seeding and sustaining nonlinear contagion in heterogeneous hyper- graphs. Communications Physics 5, 25 (2022)

  9. [17]

    & Barrat, A

    Iacopini, I., Petri, G., Baronchelli, A. & Barrat, A. Group interactions modulate critical mass dynamics in social convention. Communications Physics 5, 64 (2022)

  10. [18]

    Mill´ an, A. P.et al. Topology shapes dynamics of higher- order networks. Nature Physics 21, 353–361 (2025)

  11. [19]

    & Barrat, A

    Mancastroppa, M., Iacopini, I., Petri, G. & Barrat, A. Hyper-cores promote localization and efficient seeding in higher-order processes. Nature Communications 14, 6223 (2023)

  12. [20]

    A., Mancastroppa, M

    Cencetti, G., Contreras, D. A., Mancastroppa, M. & Bar- rat, A. Distinguishing simple and complex contagion pro- cesses on networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 247401 (2023)

  13. [21]

    & Karsai, M

    Andres, E., Odor, G., Iacopini, I. & Karsai, M. Distin- guishing mechanisms of social contagion from local net- work view. npj Complexity 2, 8 (2025)

  14. [22]

    & Sayama, H

    Gross, T. & Sayama, H. Adaptive networks. In Adap- tive networks: Theory, models and applications , 1–8 (Springer, 2009)

  15. [23]

    & Yanchuk, S

    Berner, R., Gross, T., Kuehn, C., Kurths, J. & Yanchuk, S. Adaptive dynamical networks. Physics Reports 1031, 1–59 (2023)

  16. [24]

    & Blasius, B

    Gross, T. & Blasius, B. Adaptive coevolutionary net- works: a review. J. R. Soc. Interface 5, 259–271 (2008)

  17. [25]

    Sayama, H. et al. Modeling complex systems with adap- tive networks. Computers & Mathematics with Applica- tions 65, 1645–1664 (2013)

  18. [26]

    & Jansen, V

    Funk, S., Salath´ e, M. & Jansen, V. A. A. Modelling the influence of human behaviour on the spread of infectious diseases: a review. J. R. Soc. Interface 7, 1247–1256 (2010)

  19. [27]

    & Vespignani, A

    Perra, N., Balcan, D., Gon¸ calves, B. & Vespignani, A. Towards a characterization of behavior-disease models. PLOS ONE 6, e23084 (2011)

  20. [28]

    & Beutels, P

    Verelst, F., Willem, L. & Beutels, P. Behavioural change models for infectious disease transmission: a systematic review (2010–2015). J. R. Soc. Interface 13, 20160820 (2016)

  21. [29]

    De Bruin, W. B. & Bennett, D. Relationships between initial covid-19 risk perceptions and protective health be- haviors: a national survey. American Journal of Preven- tive Medicine 59, 157–167 (2020)

  22. [30]

    & Paolotti, D

    De Gaetano, A., Barrat, A. & Paolotti, D. Modeling the interplay between disease spread, behaviors, and disease perception with a data-driven approach. Mathematical Biosciences 378, 109337 (2024)

  23. [31]

    Gross, T., D’Lima, C. J. D. & Blasius, B. Epidemic dynamics on an adaptive network. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 208701 (2006)

  24. [32]

    & Sguanci, L

    Bagnoli, F., Li` o, P. & Sguanci, L. Risk perception in epidemic modeling. Phys. Rev. E 76, 061904 (2007)

  25. [33]

    & Dub´ e, L

    Marceau, V., No¨ el, P.-A., H´ ebert-Dufresne, L., Allard, A. & Dub´ e, L. J. Adaptive networks: Coevolution of disease and topology. Phys. Rev. E 82, 036116 (2010)

  26. [34]

    & Barrat, A

    Moinet, A., Pastor-Satorras, R. & Barrat, A. Effect of risk perception on epidemic spreading in temporal net- works. Phys. Rev. E 97, 012313 (2018)

  27. [35]

    Fenichel, E. P. et al. Adaptive human behavior in epi- 7 demiological models. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6306–6311 (2011)

  28. [36]

    & Jansen, V

    Funk, S., Gilad, E., Watkins, C. & Jansen, V. A. A. The spread of awareness and its impact on epidemic outbreaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6872–6877 (2009)

  29. [37]

    Capturing human behaviour

    Ferguson, N. Capturing human behaviour. Nature 446, 733–733 (2007)

  30. [38]

    & Karsai, M

    ´Odor, G. & Karsai, M. Epidemic-induced local aware- ness behavior inferred from surveys and genetic sequence data. Nature Communications 16, 4758 (2025)

  31. [39]

    & Van Mieghem, P

    Guo, D., Trajanovski, S., van de Bovenkamp, R., Wang, H. & Van Mieghem, P. Epidemic threshold and topo- logical structure of susceptible-infectious-susceptible ep i- demics in adaptive networks. Phys. Rev. E 88, 042802 (2013)

  32. [40]

    Kolok, C. m. H. B., ´Odor, G., Keliger, D. & Karsai, M. Epidemic paradox induced by awareness driven network dynamics. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L012061 (2025)

  33. [41]

    & Burioni, R

    Mancastroppa, M., Vezzani, A., Colizza, V. & Burioni, R. Preserving system activity while controlling epidemic spreading in adaptive temporal networks. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033159 (2024)

  34. [42]

    V., Allard, A

    Scarpino, S. V., Allard, A. & H´ ebert-Dufresne, L. The effect of a prudent adaptive behaviour on disease trans- mission. Nature Physics 12, 1042 (2016)

  35. [43]

    & Vezzani, A

    Mancastroppa, M., Burioni, R., Colizza, V. & Vezzani, A. Active and inactive quarantine in epidemic spreading on adaptive activity-driven networks. Phys. Rev. E 102, 020301 (2020)

  36. [44]

    & Bu- rioni, R

    Mancastroppa, M., Castellano, C., Vezzani, A. & Bu- rioni, R. Stochastic sampling effects favor manual over digital contact tracing. Nature Communications 12, 1919 (2021)

  37. [45]

    & H´ ebert-Dufresne, L

    Burgio, G., St-Onge, G. & H´ ebert-Dufresne, L. Charac- teristic scales and adaptation in higher-order contagions. Nature Communications 16, 4589 (2025)

  38. [46]

    & Tang, S

    Liu, L., Zheng, H., Han, Z., Wang, X. & Tang, S. Higher-order network adaptivity: co-evolution of higher- order structure and spreading dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.15445 (2025)

  39. [47]

    & Barrat, A

    Mancastroppa, M., Karsai, M. & Barrat, A. Higher- order adaptive behaviours outperform pairwise strategies in controlling contagion dynamics. In preparation (2026)

  40. [48]

    & Petri, G

    Lucas, M., Iacopini, I., Robiglio, T., Barrat, A. & Petri, G. Simplicially driven simple contagion. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013201 (2023)

  41. [49]

    In [ 45] we also consider a version in which each infectious neighbor j of i contributes to the awareness proportion- ally to the weight of the link ij

  42. [50]

    URL http://www

    Sociopatterns collaboration (2008). URL http://www. sociopatterns.org/

  43. [51]

    Vanhems, P. et al. Estimating potential infection trans- mission routes in hospital wards using wearable proximity sensors. PLOS ONE 8, e73970 (2013)

  44. [52]

    & Barrat, A

    G´ enois, M. & Barrat, A. Can co-location be used as a proxy for face-to-face contacts? EPJ Data Science 7, 11 (2018)

  45. [53]

    Combining sensors and surveys to study social interactions: A case of four science conferences

    G´ enois, M.et al. Combining sensors and surveys to study social interactions: A case of four science conferences. Personality Science 4, e9957 (2023)

  46. [54]

    High-resolution measurements of face-to- face contact patterns in a primary school

    Stehl´ e, J.et al. High-resolution measurements of face-to- face contact patterns in a primary school. PLOS ONE 6, e23176 (2011)

  47. [55]

    & Barrat, A

    Mastrandrea, R., Fournet, J. & Barrat, A. Contact pat- terns in a high school: A comparison between data col- lected using wearable sensors, contact diaries and friend- ship surveys. PLOS ONE 10, e0136497 (2015)

  48. [56]

    & Schweitzer, F

    Papanikolaou, N., Vaccario, G., Hormann, E., Lam- biotte, R. & Schweitzer, F. Consensus from group inter- actions: An adaptive voter model on hypergraphs. Phys. Rev. E 105, 054307 (2022)

  49. [57]

    & Kuehn, C

    Horstmeyer, L. & Kuehn, C. Adaptive voter model on simplicial complexes. Phys. Rev. E 101, 022305 (2020)

  50. [58]

    & Hern´ andez, L

    Schawe, H. & Hern´ andez, L. Higher order interactions destroy phase transitions in deffuant opinion dynamics model. Communications Physics 5, 32 (2022)

  51. [59]

    & Strohmaier, M

    G´ enois, M., Schaible, J., Zens, M., Oliveira, M. & Strohmaier, M. Sociopatterns conferences dataset - con- tact data. GESIS, Cologne (2022). URL https://doi. org/10.7802/2351

  52. [61]

    The absorbing state is thus stable if and only if the largest eigenvalue of {Ji,j} is negative, i.e

    around the absorbing state P = [0, 0, ..., 0] leads to the Jacobian matrix with element Ji,j = −µδi,j + λ2 0wi,j. The absorbing state is thus stable if and only if the largest eigenvalue of {Ji,j} is negative, i.e. if: r = λ2 0/µ < 1/Λw ≡ rN AD,p C , (16) 9 where Λ w is the la...

  53. [62]

    (25) Therefore, by substituting in Eq. ( 24), if χie>1 e ∼ 0, the contagion dynamics near the critical point is governed by: ∂tPi(t) ∼ −µPi(t) + (1 − Pi(t)) ∑ j∈V wi,jλ2 0Pj(t), (26) which reproduces that of the NAD pairwise case (see Eq. ( 3)), implying the continuous nature ...

  54. [63]

    Vanhems, P. et al. Estimating potential infection transmission routes in hospit al wards using wearable proximity sensors. PLOS ONE 8, e73970 (2013)

  55. [64]

    URL http://www.sociopatterns.org/

    Sociopatterns collaboration (2008). URL http://www.sociopatterns.org/

  56. [65]

    High-resolution measurements of face-to-face contact patterns in a primary school

    Stehl´ e, J.et al. High-resolution measurements of face-to-face contact patterns in a primary school. PLOS ONE 6, e23176 (2011)

  57. [66]

    & Barrat, A

    Mastrandrea, R., Fournet, J. & Barrat, A. Contact patterns in a h igh school: A comparison between data collected using wearable sensors, contact diaries and friendship surveys. PLOS ONE 10, e0136497 (2015)

  58. [67]

    G´ enois, M. et al. Combining sensors and surveys to study social interactions: A c ase of four science conferences. Personality Science 4, e9957 (2023)

  59. [68]

    & Barrat, A

    Mancastroppa, M., Iacopini, I., Petri, G. & Barrat, A. Hyper-c ores promote localization and efficient seeding in higher-order processes. Nature Communications 14, 6223 (2023)

  60. [69]

    & Barrat, A

    Iacopini, I., Petri, G., Baronchelli, A. & Barrat, A. Group int eractions modulate critical mass dynamics in social convention. Communications Physics 5, 64 (2022)

  61. [70]

    & Barrat, A

    Agostinelli, C., Mancastroppa, M. & Barrat, A. Higher-order d issimilarity measures for hypergraph comparison. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.16959 (2025)

  62. [71]

    & Barrat, A

    Mancastroppa, M., Karsai, M. & Barrat, A. Higher-order adaptiv e behaviours outperform pairwise strategies in controlling contagion dynamics. In preparation (2026)

  63. [72]

    & Ves pignani, A

    Pastor-Satorras, R., Castellano, C., Van Mieghem, P. & Ves pignani, A. Epidemic processes in complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 925–979 (2015)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.