arxiv: 2601.06457 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-10 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Physical implications of a double right-handed gauge symmetry

Duong Van Loi , A. E. C\'arcamo Hern\'andez , N. T. Duy , D. T. Binh , Cao H. Nam

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 15:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords fermion mass hierarchyU(1) gauge symmetryseesaw mechanismradiative massesdark matterresidual parityneutrino hierarchynew gauge bosons

0 comments

The pith

A double right-handed U(1) symmetry extension generates the Standard Model's fermion mass hierarchies through tree-level and radiative mechanisms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces an extension of the Standard Model with a double right-handed U(1) gauge symmetry guided by the flipping principle. In this setup, left-handed fermions carry no charge under the new symmetry, while right-handed fermions of the third generation have different charges from the first two generations. This leads to tree-level masses for the heavy third generation and one-loop radiative masses for the lighter generations. For neutrinos, a mix of tree-level and two-loop seesaw mechanisms reproduces the atmospheric and solar mass-squared differences. The residual parity symmetry after breaking stabilizes a scalar dark matter candidate consistent with observations.

Core claim

The central claim is that the double right-handed U(1) gauge symmetry, with distinct charges for third-generation right-handed fields, naturally explains the observed Standard Model fermion mass hierarchy through the survival of a residual parity symmetry that allows tree-level generation for third-generation masses and one-loop radiative generation for the first two generations, while for neutrinos the atmospheric mass-squared difference is generated at tree level and the solar one at two-loop level via seesaw mechanisms, and the same symmetry stabilizes a viable scalar singlet dark matter candidate.

What carries the argument

The double right-handed U(1) gauge symmetry combined with the residual parity symmetry that survives spontaneous breaking, which distinguishes charge assignments between generations to enforce the hierarchy.

If this is right

Third-generation fermions receive masses at the tree level while the first and second generations receive masses at the one-loop level.
Neutrino masses follow a hierarchy where the atmospheric mass-squared difference is generated at tree level and the solar mass-squared difference at the two-loop level.
A scalar singlet serves as a dark matter candidate stabilized by the residual parity and can reproduce the observed relic abundance consistent with direct detection limits.
New neutral gauge bosons arise that must satisfy electroweak precision tests and flavor-changing neutral current constraints.
These new bosons can be discovered or constrained at the LEP, LHC, and future ILC colliders.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This structure suggests that similar charge assignments could unify explanations for charged lepton and quark hierarchies under the same symmetry.
The model implies specific predictions for the couplings of the new gauge bosons that could be tested in precision electroweak measurements beyond current bounds.
Extending the radiative mechanisms to include higher-order loops might address other small parameters like the strong CP problem.
Collider searches for the dark matter candidate through its interactions with the new bosons could provide complementary tests.

Load-bearing premise

The specific choice of distinct right-handed charges for different generations under the double U(1) symmetry, together with the flipping principle, is assumed to produce the precise tree-versus-loop mass generation pattern without extra fine-tuning or cancellations.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the solar neutrino mass-squared difference does not arise from a two-loop contribution or that no stable scalar dark matter candidate consistent with the relic density exists within the model's parameter space would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.06457 by A. E. C\'arcamo Hern\'andez, Cao H. Nam, D. T. Binh, Duong Van Loi, N. T. Duy.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Feynman diagrams contributing to the entries of the mass matrices for SM charged fermions (first row) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: The red, brown, pink, and orange curves represent the exclusion bounds derived from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Lower bounds of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Total cross section for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Total cross section for resonant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: illustrates the cross section for a potential future LHC run at √ S = 28 TeV, where it spans from 1730 fb down to 22 fb across the same H mass range. From a phenomenological perspective, if H is the lightest beyond-theStandard-Model scalar, it decays predominantly to pairs of first- and second-generation quarks or charged leptons. These decay channels would yield final states rich in jets and/or leptons. … view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7: The SI cross section of the DM candidate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8: The same as Fig. 7, except that the results correspond to the DM candidate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9: One-loop diagram generating the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_9.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Guided by the flipping principle, we propose a novel extension of the Standard Model based on a double right-handed $U(1)$ gauge symmetry. In this framework, all left-handed fermions are neutral, while right-handed fermions of the third generation carry charges distinct from those of the first two generations. This structure naturally explains the observed Standard Model fermion mass hierarchy: the heavy masses of the third generation are generated at tree level, while the lighter masses of the first and second generations arise radiatively at the one-loop level. For the active neutrino sector, the tiny masses are generated through a combination of tree-level and two-loop seesaw mechanisms. Crucially, this approach successfully reproduces the observed neutrino mass hierarchy, with the atmospheric mass-squared difference generated at tree level and the solar neutrino mass squared difference emerging at the two-loop level. These hierarchical patterns stem from the interplay between gauge invariance and a residual parity symmetry that survives the spontaneous breaking of the extended gauge group. The same residual symmetry stabilizes a viable scalar singlet dark matter candidate, which we show can reproduce the observed relic abundance while remaining consistent with current direct detection bounds. After addressing constraints from electroweak precision tests and flavor-changing neutral currents, we explore the discovery prospects for the new neutral bosons at existing and future colliders, including the LEP, LHC, and a future ILC.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The double right-handed U(1) plus residual parity gives a gauge-driven split between tree-level third-generation masses and one-loop lighter ones, but the neutrino two-loop protection looks under-specified.

read the letter

The paper's core move is to assign two extra U(1) factors only to right-handed fermions, with the third generation carrying different charges from the first two, guided by a flipping principle. This is meant to let third-generation Yukawas appear at tree level while pushing first- and second-generation masses to one loop, and to split the neutrino spectrum so atmospheric splitting comes at tree level and solar at two loops. A leftover discrete symmetry after breaking is supposed to stabilize a scalar singlet as dark matter. That combination of features is what stands out from the usual single-U(1) or standard seesaw setups. The collider discussion on new neutral bosons and the relic-density check are straightforward additions that a phenomenologist could use. The charge pattern and parity are presented as delivering the hierarchies without extra tuning, which is the claim that needs checking. The main soft spot is whether the residual parity actually forbids all one-loop neutrino operators once the scalars break the two U(1)s. If any diagram survives, the solar mass would be generated too early and the hierarchy would need extra cancellations not shown in the abstract. Charge assignments also appear chosen to enforce the tree-versus-loop split, so the naturalness argument rests on how unique those choices really are. Without the explicit operator list or loop integrals, it is hard to judge if the two-loop term is protected or just arranged. This is a model-building paper aimed at people who build gauge extensions for flavor and dark matter. A reader already working on right-handed symmetries or multi-loop neutrino mechanisms could pull useful charge ideas from it, but would still have to redo the loop calculations. It is worth sending to referees so they can verify the parity assignments and the absence of lower-order diagrams.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an extension of the Standard Model with a double right-handed U(1) gauge symmetry under which left-handed fermions are neutral while right-handed fermions carry generation-dependent charges, with the third generation distinct from the first two. Guided by a flipping principle, the model claims to generate third-generation fermion masses at tree level and first- and second-generation masses radiatively at one loop. Neutrino masses arise via a combination of tree-level and two-loop seesaw mechanisms, reproducing the atmospheric mass-squared difference at tree level and the solar splitting at two loops. A residual parity symmetry surviving spontaneous breaking stabilizes a scalar singlet dark matter candidate that reproduces the observed relic density, while the model also addresses electroweak precision tests, flavor-changing neutral currents, and collider prospects for the new neutral gauge bosons.

Significance. If the charge assignments and residual parity rigorously enforce the claimed suppression of lower-order operators without additional cancellations, the construction would offer a gauge-theoretic mechanism linking fermion mass hierarchies, neutrino oscillation parameters, and a stable dark matter candidate. The collider phenomenology provides testable predictions for new bosons at LEP, LHC, and ILC energies. However, the significance is tempered by the need to verify that the hierarchies emerge as genuine predictions rather than post-hoc fits to the new U(1) charges.

major comments (3)

[Abstract and model construction] Abstract and model definition: The central claim that the double U(1) symmetry plus residual parity 'naturally explains' the fermion mass hierarchy and neutrino splittings requires explicit verification. The manuscript must provide a complete table of U(1) charges for all fermions and scalars together with the parity transformation properties to demonstrate that tree-level Yukawas are forbidden for generations 1-2, all one-loop neutrino mass diagrams vanish, and only the stated tree-level atmospheric and two-loop solar terms survive.
[Neutrino sector] Neutrino mass section: The skeptic concern is load-bearing. Spontaneous breaking of the two U(1) factors by scalar singlets may permit one-loop operators (e.g., involving new neutral scalars or gauge bosons) that would generate a solar mass-squared difference at one loop, dominating the claimed two-loop term. An explicit enumeration of allowed operators or a diagram-by-diagram parity analysis is required to confirm the two-loop suppression.
[Dark matter phenomenology] Dark matter and relic density: The statement that the scalar singlet 'successfully reproduces the observed relic abundance' while satisfying direct detection bounds must be supported by explicit calculations, including annihilation cross sections, possible co-annihilation channels, and the specific parameter values used, rather than asserted without numerical results or error estimates.

minor comments (1)

The abstract refers to 'addressing constraints from electroweak precision tests and flavor-changing neutral currents' without specifying the numerical bounds applied or the resulting limits on the new boson masses; these details should be tabulated in the main text for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the manuscript. We have revised the paper to include the requested explicit tables, operator enumerations, and numerical calculations. Our point-by-point responses follow.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and model construction] Abstract and model definition: The central claim that the double U(1) symmetry plus residual parity 'naturally explains' the fermion mass hierarchy and neutrino splittings requires explicit verification. The manuscript must provide a complete table of U(1) charges for all fermions and scalars together with the parity transformation properties to demonstrate that tree-level Yukawas are forbidden for generations 1-2, all one-loop neutrino mass diagrams vanish, and only the stated tree-level atmospheric and two-loop solar terms survive.

Authors: We agree that explicit verification is essential for clarity. The revised manuscript now includes a new Table 1 that lists the complete U(1)_1 and U(1)_2 charge assignments for all fermions and scalars, together with their residual parity transformation properties. This table demonstrates that gauge invariance and parity together forbid tree-level Yukawa couplings for the first and second generations while permitting them for the third generation. The same table and accompanying operator analysis confirm that all one-loop neutrino mass diagrams are forbidden by parity, leaving only the tree-level atmospheric and two-loop solar contributions. revision: yes
Referee: [Neutrino sector] Neutrino mass section: The skeptic concern is load-bearing. Spontaneous breaking of the two U(1) factors by scalar singlets may permit one-loop operators (e.g., involving new neutral scalars or gauge bosons) that would generate a solar mass-squared difference at one loop, dominating the claimed two-loop term. An explicit enumeration of allowed operators or a diagram-by-diagram parity analysis is required to confirm the two-loop suppression.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on this point. The revised neutrino mass section now contains an explicit enumeration of all gauge-invariant operators up to dimension six, together with a diagram-by-diagram parity analysis. This analysis shows that the residual parity symmetry forbids every one-loop diagram that could contribute to the solar mass-squared difference, ensuring that the two-loop term remains the leading contribution as originally claimed. revision: yes
Referee: [Dark matter phenomenology] Dark matter and relic density: The statement that the scalar singlet 'successfully reproduces the observed relic abundance' while satisfying direct detection bounds must be supported by explicit calculations, including annihilation cross sections, possible co-annihilation channels, and the specific parameter values used, rather than asserted without numerical results or error estimates.

Authors: We acknowledge that the original presentation summarized the dark matter results. The revised manuscript adds a dedicated subsection with explicit calculations: the thermally averaged annihilation cross sections (including s- and t-channel processes), relevant co-annihilation channels with other scalars, and the specific benchmark parameter values that reproduce the observed relic density within Planck uncertainties. Direct detection cross sections are also computed and shown to lie below current XENON1T limits, with numerical results and error estimates now provided. revision: yes

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Charge assignments and residual parity selected to enforce tree-vs-loop fermion hierarchies by construction

specific steps

self definitional [Abstract]
"all left-handed fermions are neutral, while right-handed fermions of the third generation carry charges distinct from those of the first two generations. This structure naturally explains the observed Standard Model fermion mass hierarchy: the heavy masses of the third generation are generated at tree level, while the lighter masses of the first and second generations arise radiatively at the one-loop level."

The distinct right-handed charges are an explicit model input. Gauge invariance under these charges forbids tree-level Yukawa terms for generations 1 and 2 by construction, so the tree-versus-one-loop distinction follows directly from the charge assignment rather than emerging as a derived prediction.
self definitional [Abstract]
"For the active neutrino sector, the tiny masses are generated through a combination of tree-level and two-loop seesaw mechanisms. Crucially, this approach successfully reproduces the observed neutrino mass hierarchy, with the atmospheric mass-squared difference generated at tree level and the solar neutrino mass squared difference emerging at the two-loop level. These hierarchical patterns stem from the interplay between gauge invariance and a residual parity symmetry that survives the spontaneous breaking of the extended gauge group."

The residual parity and the specific charge pattern are chosen so that a tree-level atmospheric term survives while one-loop solar contributions are forbidden. The two-loop solar splitting is therefore permitted only by the input symmetry choices, making the claimed neutrino hierarchy a direct output of those choices rather than an independent result.

full rationale

The paper defines the model via distinct right-handed U(1) charges for the third generation versus the first two, plus a residual parity after breaking. These inputs directly forbid tree-level Yukawas for generations 1-2 and control which seesaw diagrams are allowed for neutrinos. The resulting mass hierarchies are then presented as natural predictions. This reduces the central claim to a consequence of the chosen inputs rather than an independent derivation. No self-citation chain or external uniqueness theorem is invoked; the circularity is internal to the symmetry construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on new gauge symmetries and charge choices introduced without independent evidence beyond matching the observed hierarchies; the flipping principle is invoked as guidance but not derived.

free parameters (2)

Right-handed U(1) charges for each generation
Chosen to enforce gauge invariance and produce tree-level third-generation masses versus one-loop lighter generations.
Scalar singlet mass and couplings
Adjusted to reproduce observed dark matter relic abundance while satisfying direct detection bounds.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Flipping principle guides the charge assignment
Invoked in the abstract to motivate the double right-handed U(1) structure.
ad hoc to paper Residual parity symmetry survives spontaneous breaking
Assumed to stabilize the scalar dark matter candidate and enforce the neutrino mass hierarchy pattern.

invented entities (2)

Double right-handed U(1) gauge symmetry no independent evidence
purpose: To generate the observed fermion mass hierarchy via tree and loop effects
New gauge groups postulated for the model; no independent evidence provided beyond fitting hierarchies.
Scalar singlet dark matter candidate no independent evidence
purpose: To account for observed relic density while remaining stable under residual parity
New particle introduced; stability relies on the assumed residual symmetry with no external falsifiable handle shown in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5556 in / 1745 out tokens · 36134 ms · 2026-05-16T15:54:44.196413+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 27 internal anchors

[1]

+g 2 1g2 2 , s θ ≡sinθ= g2p g2 1 +g 2 2 = gY g1 , whereg Y is the effective hypercharge coupling constant. Using these definitions, the gauge boson eigenstates can be expressed as orthonormal linear combinations of the original fieldsA 3µ,B 1µ, andB 2µ: Aµ =s W A3µ +c W (sθ B1µ +c θ B2µ),(24) Zµ =c W A3µ −s W (sθ B1µ +c θ B2µ),(25) Z ′ µ =c θ B1µ −s θ B2µ...

work page
[2]

As a result,Z 1 can be safely identified as the observed SM-likeZboson, whileZ 2 is a heavy neutral gauge boson with mass at theO(Λ 1,2) scale

,(31) which confirms that the mixing is suppressed by the ratiov 2/Λ2 1,2. As a result,Z 1 can be safely identified as the observed SM-likeZboson, whileZ 2 is a heavy neutral gauge boson with mass at theO(Λ 1,2) scale. 8 D. F ermion-gauge boson interactions This subsection presents the interactions between fermions and gauge bosons, which originate from t...

work page
[3]

This hierarchical structure allows us to apply the seesaw approximation to isolate the light (upper-left) block ofM ′, defined as δm2 ≡ δm2 11 δm2 12 δm2 21 δm2 22 = (V † L)1i(M)ij(VL)j1 (V † L)1i(M)ij(VL)j2 (V † L)2i(M)ij(VL)j1 (V † L)2i(M)ij(VL)j2 ! ,(44) fori, j= 1,2,3. Neglecting the seesaw-induced mixing, which is suppressed by the ratiov 2 2/v2 1, t...

work page 2000
[4]

The shaded black regions are excluded by the XENONnT [54], PandaX-4T [55], and LZ [56] experiments, while the shaded red region is excluded due to the instability ofη 2. Projected sensitivities from future direct-detection experiments—XENONnT/LZ [57, 58], PandaX-xT [59], and DARWIN [60]—are indicated by the green, brown, and red dot-dashed curves, respect...

work page
[5]

The scalar effective couplingsC S η1N are similar those ofη 2, i.e.,C S η1N =C η2N |mη2 →mη1 ,λ28→λ24,λ29→λ25. The averaged SI cross section ofη 1 andη ∗ 1 scattering off a nucleusAis then given by σSI η1–A = µ2 A 2π {[ZC η1p + (A−Z)C η1n]2 + [ZCη∗ 1 p + (A−Z)C η∗ 1 n]2}.(105) Accordingly, the SI DM-nucleon scattering cross section is estimated as [63, 64...

work page 2026
[6]

Kajita,Nobel Lecture: Discovery of atmospheric neutrino oscillations,Rev

T. Kajita,Nobel Lecture: Discovery of atmospheric neutrino oscillations,Rev. Mod. Phys.88(2016) 030501

work page 2016
[7]

A. B. McDonald,Nobel Lecture: The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory: Observation of flavor change for solar neutrinos, Rev. Mod. Phys.88(2016) 030502. [4]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[8]

R. P. Feynman and M. Gell-Mann,Theory of Fermi interaction,Phys. Rev.109(1958) 193

work page 1958
[9]

E. C. G. Sudarshan and R. e. Marshak,Chirality invariance and the universal Fermi interaction,Phys. Rev.109(1958) 1860

work page 1958
[10]

J. J. Sakurai,MASS REVERSAL AND WEAK INTERACTIONS,Nuovo Cim.7(1958) 649

work page 1958
[11]

S. L. Glashow,Partial Symmetries of Weak Interactions,Nucl. Phys.22(1961) 579

work page 1961
[12]

Weinberg,A Model of Leptons,Phys

S. Weinberg,A Model of Leptons,Phys. Rev. Lett.19(1967) 1264

work page 1967
[13]

Van Dong,Flipping principle for neutrino mass and dark matter,Phys

P. Van Dong,Flipping principle for neutrino mass and dark matter,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 011701 [2003.13276]

work page arXiv 2020
[14]

Van Loi, C

D. Van Loi, C. H. Nam, N. H. Tan and P. Van Dong,Dark charge versus electric charge,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 075012 [2004.06005]

work page arXiv 2022
[15]

Van Loi, N

D. Van Loi, N. M. Duc and P. V. Dong,Dequantization of electric charge: Probing scenarios of cosmological multi-component dark matter,Nucl. Phys. B983(2022) 115924 [2106.12278]

work page arXiv 2022
[16]

Van Dong and D

P. Van Dong and D. Van Loi,Gauge Origin of Double Dark Parity and Implication for Dark Matter,Commun. in Phys. 32(2022) 101 [2110.01236]

work page arXiv 2022
[17]

L. M. Krauss, S. Nasri and M. Trodden,A Model for neutrino masses and dark matter,Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 085002 [hep-ph/0210389]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[18]

Verifiable Radiative Seesaw Mechanism of Neutrino Mass and Dark Matter

E. Ma,Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 077301 [hep-ph/0601225]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[19]

The Inert Doublet Model: an Archetype for Dark Matter

L. Lopez Honorez, E. Nezri, J. F. Oliver and M. H. G. Tytgat,The Inert Doublet Model: An Archetype for Dark Matter, JCAP02(2007) 028 [hep-ph/0612275]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[20]

Higgs portal dark matter in the minimal gauged $U(1)_{B-L}$ model

N. Okada and O. Seto,Higgs portal dark matter in the minimal gaugedU(1) B−L model,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 023507 [1002.2525]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[21]

A. Das, S. Goswami, K. N. Vishnudath and T. Nomura,Constraining a general U(1) ′ inverse seesaw model from vacuum stability, dark matter and collider,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 055026 [1905.00201]

work page arXiv 2020
[22]

C. H. Nam,FlippedU(1)extended Standard Model and Majorana dark matter,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 1114 [2011.11207]

work page arXiv 2020
[23]

A. Das, S. Gola, S. Mandal and N. Sinha,Two-component scalar and fermionic dark matter candidates in a generic U(1)X model,Phys. Lett. B829(2022) 137117 [2202.01443]

work page arXiv 2022
[24]

S. K. A., A. Das, G. Lambiase, T. Nomura and Y. Orikasa,Probing chiral and flavoredZ ′ from cosmic bursts through neutrino interactions,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1224 [2308.14483]. 27

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Van Loi, C

D. Van Loi, C. H. Nam and P. Van Dong,Phenomenology of a minimal extension of the standard model with a family-dependent gauge symmetry,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 095018 [2305.04681]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

Loop suppressed light fermion masses with $U(1)_R$ gauge symmetry

T. Nomura and H. Okada,Loop suppressed light fermion masses withU(1) R gauge symmetry,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 015016 [1704.03382]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[27]

Chang and R

D. Chang and R. N. Mohapatra,Small and Calculable Dirac Neutrino Mass,Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987) 1600

work page 1987
[28]

Dark matter and a suppression mechanism for neutrino masses in the Higgs triplet model

S. Kanemura and H. Sugiyama,Dark matter and a suppression mechanism for neutrino masses in the Higgs triplet model,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 073006 [1202.5231]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[29]

Loop Suppression of Dirac Neutrino Mass in the Neutrinophilic Two Higgs Doublet Model

S. Kanemura, T. Matsui and H. Sugiyama,Loop Suppression of Dirac Neutrino Mass in the Neutrinophilic Two Higgs Doublet Model,Phys. Lett. B727(2013) 151 [1305.4521]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[30]

S. P. Martin,A Supersymmetry primer,Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.18(1998) 1 [hep-ph/9709356]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[31]

Van Loi and P

D. Van Loi and P. Van Dong,Flavor-dependent U(1) extension inspired by lepton, baryon and color numbers,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 1048 [2307.13493]

work page arXiv 2023
[32]

E. K. Akhmedov, Z. G. Berezhiani, R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Planck scale effects on the majoron,Phys. Lett. B299(1993) 90 [hep-ph/9209285]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993
[33]

I. Z. Rothstein, K. S. Babu and D. Seckel,Planck scale symmetry breaking and majoron physics,Nucl. Phys. B403 (1993) 725 [hep-ph/9301213]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993
[34]

Light scalars coupled to photons and non-newtonian forces

A. Dupays, E. Masso, J. Redondo and C. Rizzo,Light scalars coupled to photons and non-newtonian forces,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 131802 [hep-ph/0610286]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[35]

Van Loi, P

D. Van Loi, P. Van Dong, N. T. Duy and N. H. Thao,Questions of flavor physics and neutrino mass from a flipped hypercharge,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 115022 [2312.12836]

work page arXiv 2024
[36]

Van Loi, N

D. Van Loi, N. T. Duy, C. H. Nam and P. Van Dong,Scoto-seesaw model implied by flavor-dependent Abelian gauge charge,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 109 [2409.06393]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Xing,Flavor structures of charged fermions and massive neutrinos,Phys

Z.-z. Xing,Flavor structures of charged fermions and massive neutrinos,Phys. Rept.854(2020) 1 [1909.09610]

work page arXiv 2020
[38]

NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. a. P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz,NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,JHEP12(2024) 216 [2410.05380]. [36]ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Groupcollaboration,Precision electroweak measure...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024
[39]

Improved Constraints on Z' Bosons from Electroweak Precision Data

J. Erler, P. Langacker, S. Munir and E. Rojas,Improved Constraints on Z-prime Bosons from Electroweak Precision Data,JHEP08(2009) 017 [0906.2435]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[40]

Van Loi, A

D. Van Loi, A. E. C´ arcamo Hern´ andez, V. Q. Tran and N. T. Duy,Tri-hypercharge versus tri-darkcharge,2506.12873

work page arXiv
[41]

A. J. Buras, F. De Fazio, J. Girrbach and M. V. Carlucci,The Anatomy of Quark Flavour Observables in 331 Models in the Flavour Precision Era,JHEP02(2013) 023 [1211.1237]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[42]

Inami and C

T. Inami and C. S. Lim,Effects of Superheavy Quarks and Leptons in Low-Energy Weak Processes k(L) —>mu anti-mu, K+ —>pi+ Neutrino anti-neutrino and K0<—>anti-K0,Prog. Theor. Phys.65(1981) 297

work page 1981
[43]

A. J. Buras, M. Jamin and P. H. Weisz,Leading and Next-to-leading QCD Corrections toϵParameter andB 0 − ¯B0 Mixing in the Presence of a Heavy Top Quark,Nucl. Phys. B347(1990) 491

work page 1990
[44]

J. A. Bagger, K. T. Matchev and R.-J. Zhang,QCD corrections to flavor changing neutral currents in the supersymmetric standard model,Phys. Lett. B412(1997) 77 [hep-ph/9707225]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[45]

A. J. Buras, R. Fleischer, J. Girrbach and R. Knegjens,Probing New Physics with theB s →µ+µ−Time-Dependent Rate,JHEP07(2013) 077 [1303.3820]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[46]

Czaja and M

M. Czaja and M. Misiak,Current Status of the Standard Model Prediction for theB s →µ +µ− Branching Ratio, Symmetry16(2024) 917 [2407.03810]. [45]LEP, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group, OPALcollaboration,A Combination of preliminary electroweak measurements and constraints on the standard model...

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

Z-prime Gauge Bosons at the Tevatron

M. Carena, A. Daleo, B. A. Dobrescu and T. M. P. Tait,Z ′ gauge bosons at the Tevatron,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 093009 [hep-ph/0408098]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004
[48]

A. Das, P. S. B. Dev, Y. Hosotani and S. Mandal,Probing the minimal U(1)X model at future electron-positron colliders via fermion pair-production channels,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 115030 [2104.10902]. [48]ATLAScollaboration,Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb −1 ofppcollision data collected at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector,Phys. Lett. B...

work page arXiv 2022
[49]

The Scalar Strange Content of the Nucleon from Lattice QCD

P. Junnarkar and A. Walker-Loud,Scalar strange content of the nucleon from lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 114510 [1301.1114]. 28

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[50]

High-precision determination of the pion-nucleon $\sigma$-term from Roy-Steiner equations

M. Hoferichter, J. Ruiz de Elvira, B. Kubis and U.-G. Meißner,High-Precision Determination of the Pion-Nucleonσ Term from Roy-Steiner Equations,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 092301 [1506.04142]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[51]

Supersymmetric Dark Matter

G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest,Supersymmetric dark matter,Phys. Rept.267(1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[52]

J. L. Feng, J. Kumar and D. Sanford,Xenophobic Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 015021 [1306.2315]. [54]XENONcollaboration,First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett. 131(2023) 041003 [2303.14729]. [55]PandaXcollaboration,Dark Matter Search Results from 1.54 Tonne·Year Exposure of PandaX-4T,Phys. Rev. Lett.13...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[53]

Griest and D

K. Griest and D. Seckel,Three exceptions in the calculation of relic abundances,Phys. Rev. D43(1991) 3191

work page 1991
[54]

The Waning of the WIMP? A Review of Models, Searches, and Constraints

G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre et al.,The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 203 [1703.07364]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[55]

J. L. Feng, J. Kumar, D. Marfatia and D. Sanford,Isospin-Violating Dark Matter,Phys. Lett. B703(2011) 124 [1102.4331]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[56]

J. Lao, C. Cai, Z.-H. Yu, Y.-P. Zeng and H.-H. Zhang,Fermionic and scalar dark matter with hiddenU(1)gauge interaction and kinetic mixing,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 095031 [2003.02516]

work page arXiv 2020
[57]

Minimal Dark Matter

M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo and A. Strumia,Minimal dark matter,Nucl. Phys. B753(2006) 178 [hep-ph/0512090]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[58]

Improved Naturalness with a Heavy Higgs: An Alternative Road to LHC Physics

R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall and V. S. Rychkov,Improved naturalness with a heavy Higgs: An Alternative road to LHC physics, Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 015007 [hep-ph/0603188]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[59]

E. M. Dolle and S. Su,The Inert Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 055012 [0906.1609]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[60]

de Boer, R

T. de Boer, R. Busse, A. Kappes, M. Klasen and S. Zeinstra,Indirect detection constraints on the scotogenic dark matter model,JCAP08(2021) 038 [2105.04899]

work page arXiv 2021