Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 74 references

The Sahyadri simulation suite resolves dark matter halos down to 3.2e9 solar masses, a factor of about 25 better than the AbacusSummit suite, and opens the faint-galaxy regime of the DESI Bright Galaxy Survey to cosmological parameter studi

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 10:59 UTC pith:43ZYX42Z

load-bearing objection The core resolution claim checks out, but the abstract promises six parameters and derivative-ready data that the body does not yet deliver. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2601.07924 v2 pith:43ZYX42Z submitted 2026-01-12 astro-ph.CO

Sahyadri: A simulation suite for the cosmology dependence of the Cosmic Web

Saee Dhawalikar (IUCAA) , Shadab Alam (TIFR) , Aseem Paranjape (IUCAA) , Arka Banerjee (IISER Pune) This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmological N-body simulationscosmic webDESI Bright Galaxy Surveyhalo mass functionVoronoi volume functionk-nearest neighbour statisticsseed-matched initial conditionsOmega_m sensitivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents Sahyadri, a suite of dark-matter N-body simulations that evolve 2048^3 particles in a 200 h^-1 Mpc box, reaching a particle mass of 8.1e7 h^-1 M_sun. This resolves halos down to 3.2e9 h^-1 M_sun, about 25 times lower mass than the previous best parameter-varying suite, AbacusSummit. The suite varies cosmological parameters with matched initial-condition seeds, so differences between runs isolate the effect of each parameter, enabling derivative and Fisher-matrix calculations. The authors estimate this resolution brings roughly 40% of DESI BGS galaxies at z<0.15 into reach, and they demonstrate clear Omega_m sensitivity in both standard clustering and cosmic-web statistics such as the Voronoi volume function and k-nearest-neighbour distributions.

Core claim

The central claim is that Sahyadri supplies the mass resolution and parameter coverage needed to model the faint galaxy population targeted by low-redshift spectroscopic surveys, especially DESI BGS. By resolving halos at 3.2e9 h^-1 M_sun, the suite captures roughly 1.6 million BGS galaxies at z<0.15 that AbacusSummit cannot reach. The paper shows that the simulations reproduce theoretical matter power spectra and halo mass functions, and that the Voronoi volume function and k-nearest-neighbour statistics respond strongly to Omega_m variations, making these high-density cosmic-web statistics usable for cosmological inference.

What carries the argument

The carrying element is the combination of a compact box (200 h^-1 Mpc) with a very large particle count (2048^3), yielding a particle mass of 8.1e7 h^-1 M_sun and resolved halos down to 3.2e9 h^-1 M_sun (40 particles). Seed-matched initial conditions across parameter variations isolate cosmological responses, while a custom compression scheme reduces the data footprint by about a factor of three, keeping the ~117 TB total storage manageable.

Load-bearing premise

The estimate that about 40% of DESI BGS galaxies at z<0.15 become accessible relies on the assumed relation between galaxy stellar mass and halo mass, and between stellar mass and r-band luminosity, calibrated in an unpublished companion methodology; if that galaxy-halo connection is wrong, the headline accessibility gain over AbacusSummit is unsupported even though the mass-resolution claim stands.

What would settle it

Compare the same halo finder on the Sahyadri snapshots with a version degraded to AbacusSummit particle mass (2e9 h^-1 M_sun) and verify that the 40-particle minimum halo mass shifts by the expected factor of ~25. Separately, generate mock BGS galaxy catalogs from Sahyadri using the paper's assumed stellar-mass-to-halo-mass relation and check whether the predicted BGS stellar mass function at z=0.15 matches observations; a significant mismatch would invalidate the 40% figure.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • DESI BGS galaxies at z<0.15 can be modeled at the halo level for roughly 40% more galaxies than with AbacusSummit, enabling mocks and systematics studies for the faint end of the survey.
  • Seed-matched runs allow cosmological parameter derivatives for beyond-two-point statistics, opening the door to Fisher forecasts that combine VVF, kNN, and the power spectrum.
  • The demonstrated Omega_m sensitivity of high-density VVF and kNN statistics suggests these observables can contribute constraints from the non-linear regime where two-point statistics are cosmic-variance limited.
  • The same simulation infrastructure can be extended to 4MOST and other low-redshift surveys, and to higher-order statistics like Minkowski functionals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 40% BGS accessibility figure depends on assumed stellar-to-halo and mass-to-light relations applied to BGS targets; if those calibrations shift, the percentage changes even though the raw mass-resolution improvement stands.
  • The small 200 h^-1 Mpc box limits access to large-scale modes; the paper itself shows finite-volume truncation of halo-by-halo bias tails, so users should correct for this when interpreting environment statistics.
  • Only Omega_m, h, and n_s variations are complete so far; the planned full six-parameter derivative set is needed before the suite can be used as a general emulator across the full parameter space.
  • The compression scheme's sub-percent clustering accuracy would be worth independent verification with a different power-spectrum estimator, since the claim rests on a single implementation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents Sahyadri, a suite of dark-matter-only N-body simulations with 2048^3 particles in 200 h^-1 Mpc boxes, reaching a particle mass of 8.1e7 h^-1 M_sun and halo masses down to 3.2e9 h^-1 M_sun with 40 particles. The suite is designed around Planck 2018 cosmology with parameter variations, seed-matched initial conditions, and a claimed capability for cosmological parameter derivatives. The paper showcases results for the matter power spectrum, halo mass function, halo power spectrum, Voronoi volume function, kNN statistics, and environment-dependent halo correlations, and it argues that the resolution opens up access to low-mass halos relevant to DESI BGS at z<0.15. Data products are advertised as publicly available with a custom compression scheme.

Significance. If the numerical specifications hold, Sahyadri is a genuinely useful resource: its particle mass is roughly a factor 25 lower than AbacusSummit and more than two orders of magnitude below Quijote/Aemulus, while retaining a non-trivial simulation volume. The paper ships a public pipeline, includes consistency checks against halofit and Tinker, and demonstrates that high-density tracer samples enable measurements of beyond-2-point statistics such as the VVF and kNN-CDFs. These are concrete strengths. However, the two headline claims that would elevate the paper's significance—(i) reliable cosmological parameter derivatives for small-scale halo statistics and (ii) access to ~40% of DESI BGS galaxies—are not demonstrated in the manuscript: the first relies on an unpublished companion paper, and the second relies on an unpublished methodology. The central simulation product itself appears sound, but the advertised capabilities are currently only partly substantiated.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.1.1, §3.2] The abstract and §2.1.1 state that seed-matched initial conditions enable reliable estimation of derivatives of small-scale observables involving halos, but the same paragraph concedes that seed matching is not sufficient to control gravitationally induced stochasticity for halo statistics and defers to the unpublished post-processing method of [24]. In the results sections, no derivative is computed for any statistic; Figures 8, 10, and 11 show raw Ωm responses with jackknife errors described as 'for illustrative purpose only.' The central advertised capability is therefore not demonstrated in this paper and depends entirely on an external, unpublished method. Please either include derivative estimates validated at Sahyadri's resolution/volume, or explicitly recast the derivative claim as a design goal to be established in a companion paper.
  2. [Abstract, §2, §4] The abstract and storage estimates describe the suite as containing 'systematic variations of six cosmological parameters,' and the 117 TB footprint is computed for the full six-parameter set. However, §2 and §4 state that only Ωm, h, and ns variations are complete, with As, w∥, and Ωk 'in progress.' This inconsistency overstates the presently available data products and should be corrected in the abstract, the storage calculations, and the summary section.
  3. [§1, Figure 1] The headline estimate that ~40% of DESI BGS galaxies at z<0.15 are accessible to Sahyadri but not AbacusSummit is based on the unpublished 'Alam et al. (in prep)' methodology, applied to the UniverseMachine SHMR and the Bell et al. mass-to-light mapping. The paper gives no details of the BGS selection model, the abundance matching implementation, or validation against observed BGS clustering/luminosity functions. Because this estimate is used to justify the entire survey-motivation of the suite, it needs to be either fully specified in an appendix or released as a public companion document before it can be assessed.
  4. [§4 vs Appendix C] The summary in §4 states that finite-volume effects on linear halo bias become negligible (≲1%) for halos with M≳10^12 h^-1 M_sun, but Appendix C shows that while the mean halo-by-halo bias is unbiased, the median bias is underestimated by Δb∼0.2 and the scatter σ_b by ∼0.7 in the fiducial 200 h^-1 Mpc box. These effects truncate the tails of the b1 distribution that are used in the environment-correlation analyses (§3.2, Figures 12–13). The text acknowledges that Spearman correlations 'may slightly weaken' the trends, but this is in tension with the 'negligible' summary statement. Please reconcile these statements or quantify the impact on the environment results.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.1.2] The compression scheme is claimed to maintain 'sub-percent clustering accuracy,' but no direct test of compressed versus uncompressed power spectra or correlation functions is presented. A small validation figure or quantitative statement would substantiate this claim.
  2. [§3.2, Appendix A] The text in §3.2 says the matter power spectrum shows 'good agreement' with halofit and deviations begin for k≳4 h/Mpc, but Appendix A reports deviations up to ∼20% at z=0 over a wide range of scales. Please make the characterization consistent and state explicitly whether this level of agreement is expected for the simulation resolution and halofit's calibration.
  3. [§2.2, Appendix C] Typos and minor wording issues: 'reproduceability' (§2.2), 'while while' (Appendix C), and 'spectrua' (§1).
  4. [References] Reference [24] and 'Alam et al. (in prep)' are central to the paper's claims but appear only as unpublished works. If they are not yet on arXiv, please provide versions or at least a detailed public methodological appendix for the referee and readers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: simulation outputs are benchmarked against external fitting functions and prior suites, and the Omega_m responses are direct measurements rather than reductions of their own inputs.

full rationale

Sahyadri's central results are numerical experiments: 2048^3 N-body runs whose matter/halo power spectra and mass functions are compared with halofit and Tinker, and whose Omega_m sensitivities are obtained by re-running with varied input cosmologies. No parameter is fitted to the same statistic it is used to predict; the Omega_m responses in Figs. 7-11 are raw simulation ratios, not outputs of a model calibrated on those ratios. The resolution claims (m_p = 8.1e7 Msun/h, M_min = 3.2e9 Msun/h at 40 particles) follow by arithmetic from box size, particle count and a standard 40-particle threshold. The BGS fraction (~40%) is an application estimate using external relations (UniverseMachine, Bell et al.) plus the unpublished Alam et al. methodology; it is not in the simulation's derivation chain, though it is a verifiability concern. The paper does lean on prior self-authored work: [24] is invoked for stabilizing small-scale derivative estimates, and the text explicitly concedes in Sec. 2.1.1 that seed matching alone 'is not sufficient to control the gravitationally induced stochasticity due to phase-mixing at small scales, which affects statistical probes involving halos', deferring to [24]. [48,49,63] provide the VVF/tidal-anisotropy methods. These are method and companion-paper citations, not self-defining reductions of central measurements to their own inputs. The deferred derivative capability is a limitation—no derivative is actually computed here—but absence of demonstration is not circularity. Core validation is self-contained against external benchmarks, so circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 8 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard N-body modeling choices, hand-chosen parameter steps and sample cuts, external fitting functions used as benchmarks, and unpublished galaxy-halo connection models for the BGS-impact estimate. No new physical entities are introduced; the only new object is the simulation suite itself, which is a data product rather than an invented physical entity.

free parameters (6)
  • Omega_m variation step = dOmega_m = 0.05 Omega_m,f ~ 0.0157
    Hand-chosen finite-difference step in Table 2; all Omega_m sensitivity plots and derivative claims depend on this step size.
  • 40-particle halo mass threshold = M_min = 40 mp = 3.2e9 h^-1 M_sun
    Hand-chosen standard resolution threshold; defines the headline mass-resolution claim and all halo samples.
  • Halo relaxation (QE) cut = eta = 2T/|U| in [0.5, 1.5]
    Adopted from Bett et al. (2007); every analysis uses halos satisfying this cut, so it shapes all quantitative results.
  • Tracer number densities for Vpeak-selected samples = 2e-4, 2e-3, 2e-2 Mpc^-3
    Chosen by hand in Section 2.3; the VVF and kNN analyses are performed for these fixed densities.
  • Vpeak thresholds at z=0 (fiducial) = 422.5, 196.6, 74.6 km/s
    Obtained by inverting the Vpeak distribution to match the chosen number densities; in effect fitted to target sample densities.
  • Tidal-anisotropy smoothing scale = R = 4 R200b
    Hand-chosen scale defining alpha; the environment-property correlation results in Figures 12-13 depend on it.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption FLRW background plus Newtonian N-body dynamics as implemented in gadget-4 is a valid model of dark-matter structure formation from z=49 to z=0.
    Used throughout Section 2; all measurements inherit this modeling framework.
  • domain assumption 2LPT initial conditions at z=49 with the CLASS linear power spectrum are sufficient for the resolved scales.
    Section 2.1.1; no convergence test for initial-condition transients is presented.
  • domain assumption halofit and the Tinker mass function are appropriate external benchmarks for these cosmologies and mass ranges.
    Appendix A compares against them; deviations are attributed to the fits rather than to the simulation.
  • domain assumption Rockstar and consistent-trees correctly identify halos and merger trees at 40+ particles, and the QE/parent-halo cuts do not bias the samples.
    Section 2.2-2.3; halo samples are the basis of the mass-function and assembly-bias results.
  • domain assumption UniverseMachine abundance matching and the Bell et al. mass-to-light relation describe DESI BGS galaxies at z~0.15.
    Section 1 and Figure 1; underlies the 40%-of-BGS claim and depends on the unpublished Alam et al. companion paper.
  • domain assumption Seed-matched initial conditions isolate cosmological parameter dependence despite small-scale gravitational stochasticity.
    Section 2.1.1 acknowledges the limitation; the Omega_m comparisons rely on this assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The w_parallel parametrization along the CMB degeneracy with A=-3.68 is a suitable dark-energy model for derivative calculations.
    Section 2 defines it via Lodha et al. (in prep); it is not independently justified in the paper.
  • domain assumption The custom compression scheme preserves clustering statistics at the sub-percent level.
    Section 2.1.2 asserts sub-percent accuracy but provides no detailed numerical validation of this claim.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21929 in / 20162 out tokens · 184648 ms · 2026-08-03T10:59:19.531943+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present Sahyadri, a suite of cosmological $N$-body simulations designed to enable precision studies of the low-redshift Universe with next-generation spectroscopic surveys. Sahyadri includes systematic variations of four cosmological parameters around Planck 2018 constraints, with seed-matched initial conditions enabling cosmological parameter derivatives. It is planned to ultimately extend to six parameters. Each simulation evolves $2048^3$ particles in a periodic box of side length $200$ $h^{-1}$ Mpc, yielding a particle mass of $m_{\rm{p}} = 8.1 \times 10^{7}\,h^{-1}\,M_{\odot}$ in the fiducial Planck 2018 cosmology. This resolution enables robust identification of dark matter halos down to $M_{\rm min} = 3.2 \times 10^{9}$ $h^{-1}$ $M_\odot$, which represents a factor of $\sim$25 improvement over the AbacusSummit suite, and is over two orders of magnitude better than the Quijote and Aemulus suites. We estimate that approximately 40% of DESI BGS galaxies at redshift $z < 0.15$ - roughly 1.6 million objects - reside in halos accessible to Sahyadri but beyond the reach of existing parameter-varying simulation suites. We demonstrate Sahyadri's capabilities through measurements of the matter power spectrum, halo mass function and power spectrum, and beyond 2-point statistics such as the Voronoi volume function and $k^{\rm th}$ nearest neighbour statistics, showing excellent agreement with theoretical predictions and significant sensitivity to $\Omega_{\rm m}$ variations. We implement a custom compression scheme reducing storage requirements by a factor of $\sim$3 while maintaining sub-percent clustering accuracy. Key data products are publicly available.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 31 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Aghamousa, J

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen et al.,The desi experiment part i: Science, targeting, and survey design,arXiv e-prints(2016) [1611.00036]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    de Jong, O

    R.S. de Jong, O. Agertz, A.A. Berbel et al.,4most: Project overview and information for the first call for proposals,The Messenger175(2019) 3

    2019

  3. [3]

    Takada, R.S

    M. Takada, R.S. Ellis, M. Chiba et al.,Extragalactic science, cosmology, and galactic archaeology with the subaru prime focus spectrograph,Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan66(2014) R1

    2014

  4. [4]

    Mellier, F.B

    Euclid Collaboration, Y. Mellier, F.B. Abdalla et al.,Euclid: Overview of the mission and survey,arXiv e-prints(2022) [2209.02534]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    Ivezi´ c, S.M

    ˇZ. Ivezi´ c, S.M. Kahn, J.A. Tyson et al.,Lsst: From science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products,The Astrophysical Journal873(2019) 111

    2019

  6. [6]

    Ishiyama, F

    T. Ishiyama, F. Prada, A.A. Klypin et al.,The uchuu simulations: Data release 1 and dark matter halo concentrations,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society506(2021) 4210

    2021

  7. [7]

    Dav´ e, D

    R. Dav´ e, D. Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, D. Narayanan et al.,Simba: Cosmological simulations with black hole growth and feedback,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society486(2019) 2827

    2019

  8. [8]

    Schaye, R.A

    J. Schaye, R.A. Crain, R.G. Bower et al.,The eagle project: simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society446(2015) 521

    2015

  9. [9]

    Vogelsberger, S

    M. Vogelsberger, S. Genel, V. Springel et al.,Introducing the illustris project: simulating the coevolution of dark and visible matter in the universe,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society444(2014) 1518

    2014

  10. [10]

    Nelson, A

    D. Nelson, A. Pillepich, V. Springel et al.,The illustristng simulations: public data release, Computational Astrophysics and Cosmology6(2019) 2

    2019

  11. [11]

    Pillepich, D

    A. Pillepich, D. Nelson, L. Hernquist et al.,First results from the illustristng simulations: the galaxy colour bimodality,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society475(2018) 648

    2018

  12. [12]

    Springel, S.D.M

    V. Springel, S.D.M. White, A. Jenkins et al.,Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars,Nature435(2005) 629

    2005

  13. [13]

    Boylan-Kolchin, V

    M. Boylan-Kolchin, V. Springel, S.D.M. White, A. Jenkins and G. Lemson,Resolving cosmic structure formation with the millennium-ii simulation,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society398(2009) 1150

    2009

  14. [14]

    Klypin, S

    A.A. Klypin, S. Trujillo-Gomez and J. Primack,Dark matter halos in the standard cosmological model: Results from the bolshoi simulation,The Astrophysical Journal740(2011) 102

    2011

  15. [15]

    Klypin, G

    A. Klypin, G. Yepes, S. Gottl¨ ober, F. Prada and S. Heß,Multidark simulations: the story of dark matter halo concentrations and density profiles,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society457(2016) 4340

    2016

  16. [16]

    Villaescusa-Navarro, D

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, D. Angl´ es-Alc´ azar, S. Genel, D.N. Spergel, R.S. Somerville, R. Dave et al.,The CAMELS Project: Cosmology and Astrophysics with Machine-learning Simulations, ApJ915(2021) 71 [2010.00619]. 10https://matplotlib.org/ 11https://jupyter.org – 22 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Villaescusa-Navarro, C

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, C. Hahn, E. Massara et al.,The quijote simulations,The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series250(2020) 2

    2020

  18. [18]

    DeRose, R.H

    J. DeRose, R.H. Wechsler, J.L. Tinker et al.,The aemulus project. ii. emulating the halo mass function,The Astrophysical Journal875(2019) 69

    2019

  19. [19]

    McClintock, T.N

    T. McClintock, T.N. Varga, D. Gruen et al.,Dark energy survey year 1 results: Weak lensing mass calibration of redmapper galaxy clusters,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society482(2019) 1352

    2019

  20. [20]

    Nishimichi, A

    T. Nishimichi, A. Shirata, A. Taruya et al.,Dark quest. i. fast and accurate emulation of halo clustering statistics and its application to galaxy clustering,The Astrophysical Journal884 (2019) 29

    2019

  21. [21]

    Garrison, D.J

    L.H. Garrison, D.J. Eisenstein, D. Ferrer et al.,The abacus cosmos: A suite of cosmological n-body simulations,The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series236(2018) 43

    2018

  22. [22]

    Maksimova, L.H

    N.A. Maksimova, L.H. Garrison, B. Hadzhiyska et al.,Abacussummit: a massive set of high-accuracy, high-resolution n-body simulations,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society508(2021) 4017

    2021

  23. [23]

    Alam, J.A

    S. Alam, J.A. Peacock, D.J. Farrow, J. Loveday and A.M. Hopkins,Using gama to probe the impact of small-scale galaxy physics on nonlinear redshift-space distortions,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society503(2021) 59–76

    2021

  24. [24]

    Dhawalikar, A

    S. Dhawalikar, A. Paranjape and S. Alam,Stabilizing simulation-based cosmological fisher forecasts: a case study using the voronoi volume function, 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    Hahn, M.J

    C. Hahn, M.J. Wilson, O. Ruiz-Macias et al.,The desi bright galaxy survey: Final target selection, design, and validation,The Astronomical Journal165(2023) 253

    2023

  26. [26]

    Yildiz, M

    E. Yildiz, M. Biagetti, U. Seljak et al.,Towards testing the theory of gravity with desi: summary statistics, model predictions and future simulation requirements,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society493(2020) 4783

    2020

  27. [27]

    Behroozi, R.H

    P. Behroozi, R.H. Wechsler, A.P. Hearin and C. Conroy,Universemachine: The correlation between galaxy growth and dark matter halo assembly from z = 0-10,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society488(2019) 3143

    2019

  28. [28]

    Bell, D.H

    E.F. Bell, D.H. McIntosh, N. Katz and M.D. Weinberg,The optical and near-infrared properties of galaxies. i. luminosity and stellar mass functions,The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series149(2003) 289

    2003

  29. [29]

    Driver, D.T

    S.P. Driver, D.T. Hill, L.S. Kelvin et al.,Galaxy and mass assembly (gama): survey diagnostics and core data release,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society413(2011) 971

    2011

  30. [30]

    Baldry, S.P

    I.K. Baldry, S.P. Driver, J. Loveday et al.,Galaxy and mass assembly (gama): the galaxy stellar mass function at z ¡ 0.06,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society421(2012) 621

    2012

  31. [31]

    Wetzel, J.L

    A.R. Wetzel, J.L. Tinker, C. Conroy and F.C. van den Bosch,Galaxy evolution in groups and clusters: Satellite star formation histories and quenching time-scales in a hierarchical universe, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society432(2013) 336

    2013

  32. [32]

    Reines, J.E

    A.E. Reines, J.E. Greene and M. Geha,Dwarf galaxies with optical signatures of active massive black holes,The Astrophysical Journal775(2013) 116

    2013

  33. [33]

    Riess, W

    A.G. Riess, W. Yuan, L.M. Macri et al.,A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the hubble constant with 1 km s −1 mpc−1 uncertainty from the hubble space telescope and the sh0es team,The Astrophysical Journal Letters934(2022) L7

    2022

  34. [34]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami et al.,Planck 2018 results. vi. cosmological parameters,Astronomy & Astrophysics641(2020) A6. – 23 –

    2018

  35. [35]

    Adame, J

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al.,DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2404.03002 [2404.03002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Abdul Karim, J

    M. Abdul Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. Allen, C.A. Prieto et al.,Desi dr2 results. ii. measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints,Physical Review D112(2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Wadekar and R

    D. Wadekar and R. Scoccimarro,Galaxy power spectrum multipoles covariance in perturbation theory,Physical Review D102(2020) 123521

    2020

  38. [38]

    Q. Hang, S. Alam, J.A. Peacock and Y.-C. Cai,Galaxy clustering in the desi legacy survey and its imprint on the cmb,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society501(2020) 1481–1498

    2020

  39. [39]

    Ishiyama, F

    T. Ishiyama, F. Prada and A.A. Klypin,Evolution of clustering in cosmological models with time-varying dark energy,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 043504

    2025

  40. [40]

    Springel, R

    V. Springel, R. Pakmor, O. Zier and M. Reinecke,Simulating cosmic structure formation with the GADGET-4 code, MNRAS506(2021) 2871 [2010.03567]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Scoccimarro,Transients from initial conditions: a perturbative analysis, MNRAS299 (1998) 1097 [astro-ph/9711187]

    R. Scoccimarro,Transients from initial conditions: a perturbative analysis, MNRAS299 (1998) 1097 [astro-ph/9711187]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  42. [42]

    D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues and T. Tram,The cosmic linear anisotropy solving system (class). part ii: Approximation schemes,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2011(2011) 034

    2011

  43. [43]

    Lesgourgues,The cosmic linear anisotropy solving system (class) i: Overview,arXiv e-prints (2011) [1104.2932]

    J. Lesgourgues,The cosmic linear anisotropy solving system (class) i: Overview,arXiv e-prints (2011) [1104.2932]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    Coulton, F

    W.R. Coulton, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, D. Jamieson, M. Baldi, G. Jung, D. Karagiannis et al., Quijote-PNG: The Information Content of the Halo Power Spectrum and Bispectrum, ApJ943 (2023) 178 [2206.15450]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Maksimova, L.H

    N.A. Maksimova, L.H. Garrison, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Bose and D.J. Eisenstein,Abacussummit: a massive set of high-accuracy, high-resolution n-body simulations,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society508(2021) 4017

    2021

  46. [46]

    Behroozi, R.H

    P.S. Behroozi, R.H. Wechsler and H.-Y. Wu,The ROCKSTAR Phase-space Temporal Halo Finder and the Velocity Offsets of Cluster Cores, ApJ762(2013) 109 [1110.4372]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  47. [47]

    Behroozi, R.H

    P.S. Behroozi, R.H. Wechsler, H.-Y. Wu, M.T. Busha, A.A. Klypin and J.R. Primack, Gravitationally Consistent Halo Catalogs and Merger Trees for Precision Cosmology, ApJ763 (2013) 18 [1110.4370]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  48. [48]

    Paranjape, O

    A. Paranjape, O. Hahn and R.K. Sheth,Halo assembly bias and the tidal anisotropy of the local halo environment, MNRAS476(2018) 3631 [1706.09906]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Paranjape and S

    A. Paranjape and S. Alam,Voronoi volume function: a new probe of cosmology and galaxy evolution, MNRAS495(2020) 3233 [2001.08760]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    P. Bett, V. Eke, C.S. Frenk, A. Jenkins, J. Helly and J. Navarro,The spin and shape of dark matter haloes in the Millennium simulation of aΛcold dark matter universe, MNRAS376 (2007) 215 [astro-ph/0608607]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  51. [51]

    Reddick, R.H

    R.M. Reddick, R.H. Wechsler, J.L. Tinker and P.S. Behroozi,The Connection between Galaxies and Dark Matter Structures in the Local Universe, ApJ771(2013) 30 [1207.2160]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    Carretero, F.J

    J. Carretero, F.J. Castander, E. Gazta˜ naga, M. Crocce and P. Fosalba,An algorithm to build mock galaxy catalogues using MICE simulations, MNRAS447(2015) 646 [1411.3286]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  53. [53]

    Chaves-Montero, R.E

    J. Chaves-Montero, R.E. Angulo, J. Schaye, M. Schaller, R.A. Crain, M. Furlong et al.,Subhalo abundance matching and assembly bias in the EAGLE simulation, MNRAS460(2016) 3100 [1507.01948]. – 24 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    DeRose, M.R

    J. DeRose, M.R. Becker and R.H. Wechsler,Modeling Redshift-space Clustering with Abundance Matching, ApJ940(2022) 13 [2105.12104]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Takahashi, M

    R. Takahashi, M. Sato, T. Nishimichi, A. Taruya and M. Oguri,Revising the Halofit Model for the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum, ApJ761(2012) 152 [1208.2701]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  56. [56]

    Tinker, A.V

    J. Tinker, A.V. Kravtsov, A. Klypin, K. Abazajian, M. Warren, G. Yepes et al.,Toward a Halo Mass Function for Precision Cosmology: The Limits of Universality, ApJ688(2008) 709 [0803.2706]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  57. [57]

    Voronoi,Nouvelles applications des param` etres continus ` a la th´ eorie des formes quadratiques

    G. Voronoi,Nouvelles applications des param` etres continus ` a la th´ eorie des formes quadratiques. deuxi` eme m´ emoire. recherches sur les parall´ ello` edres primitifs.,Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik134(1908) 198

    1908

  58. [58]

    Banerjee and T

    A. Banerjee and T. Abel,Nearest neighbour distributions: New statistical measures for cosmological clustering,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.500(2020) 5479 [2007.13342]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    Banerjee and T

    A. Banerjee and T. Abel,Cosmological cross-correlations and nearest neighbour distributions, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.504(2021) 2911 [2102.01184]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  60. [60]

    Banerjee and T

    A. Banerjee and T. Abel,Tracer-field cross-correlations with k-nearest neighbour distributions, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.519(2023) 4856 [2210.05140]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    Gangopadhyay, A

    K. Gangopadhyay, A. Banerjee and T. Abel,Geometric Interpretations of thek-Nearest Neighbour Distributions,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.3409(2025) 3427 [2502.07713]

    arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    Banerjee, N

    A. Banerjee, N. Kokron and T. Abel,Modelling nearest neighbour distributions of biased tracers using hybrid effective field theory,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.511(2022) 2765 [2107.10287]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Ramakrishnan, A

    S. Ramakrishnan, A. Paranjape, O. Hahn and R.K. Sheth,Cosmic web anisotropy is the primary indicator of halo assembly bias, MNRAS489(2019) 2977 [1903.02007]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    Ramakrishnan, V

    S. Ramakrishnan, V. Gonzalez-Perez, G. Parimbelli and G. Yepes,The multi-dimensional halo assembly bias can be preserved when enhancing halo properties with HALOSCOPE, A&A697 (2025) A70 [2410.07361]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Ramakrishnan and P

    S. Ramakrishnan and P. Velmani,Properties beyond mass for unresolved haloes across redshift and cosmology using correlations with local halo environment, MNRAS516(2022) 5849 [2112.15305]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Ramakrishnan, A

    S. Ramakrishnan, A. Paranjape and R.K. Sheth,Mock halo catalogues: assigning unresolved halo properties using correlations with local halo environment, MNRAS503(2021) 2053 [2012.10170]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Van Der Walt, S.C

    S. Van Der Walt, S.C. Colbert and G. Varoquaux,The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation,ArXiv e-prints(2011) [1102.1523]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  68. [68]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T.E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau et al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python,Nature Methods17 (2020) 261

    2020

  69. [69]

    56 – 61, 2010, DOI

    Wes McKinney,Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python, inProceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, St´ efan van der Walt and Jarrod Millman, eds., pp. 56 – 61, 2010, DOI

    2010

  70. [70]

    pandas development team,pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, Feb., 2020

    T. pandas development team,pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, Feb., 2020. 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.3509134 2020

  71. [71]

    Hunter,Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment,Computing In Science & Engineering9 (2007) 90

    J.D. Hunter,Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment,Computing In Science & Engineering9 (2007) 90

    2007

  72. [72]

    van Daalen, J

    M.P. van Daalen, J. Schaye, C.M. Booth and C. Dalla Vecchia,The effects of galaxy formation on the matter power spectrum: a challenge for precision cosmology, MNRAS415(2011) 3649 [1104.1174]. – 25 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  73. [73]

    Tinker, B.E

    J.L. Tinker, B.E. Robertson, A.V. Kravtsov, A. Klypin, M.S. Warren, G. Yepes et al.,The Large-scale Bias of Dark Matter Halos: Numerical Calibration and Model Tests, ApJ724 (2010) 878 [1001.3162]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  74. [74]

    N. Paul, I. Pahwa and A. Paranjape,Global analysis of luminosity- and colour-dependent galaxy clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, MNRAS488(2019) 1220 [1902.01566]. A Comparison with literature fitting functions As a consistency check, we compare the matter power spectrum and halo mass function measured from our simulations with widely used fitting...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019