RECORD
Stellar masses of optically dark galaxies: uncertainty introduced by the attenuation law and star-formation histories
Astrophysics of Galaxies · Submitted 13 Jan 2026
abstract compiled · 2026-09-24 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Nevertheless, even with these revised stellar mass estimates, two of the three galaxies remain among the most massive and actively star-forming systems at their respective redshifts, implying high star-formation efficiencies.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Recent studies using JWST have suggested that some high-redshift galaxies may be ultra-massive, thereby challenging standard models of early galaxy formation. We analyse the stellar masses using different modelling assumptions and in conjunction with new data of three galaxies (S1, S2 and S3), whose photometric and NIRCam/grism redshifts were consistent with $z>5$. These three ``optically dark'' galaxies were reported to host exceptionally high stellar masses ($M_{\star}\gtrsim10^{11}~M_{\odot}$) and star-formation rates ($\mathrm{SFR}\gtrsim600~M_{\odot}~\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$), implying extremely high star-formation efficiencies. Recent NIRSpec/IFU observations for S1 indicate a spectroscopic redshift of $z_{\rm spec}=3.2439\pm0.0002$, revising the previous redshift. Using the Bayesian spectral energy distribution (SED) modelling tool \texttt{Prospector}, we investigate the impact of key model assumptions on stellar mass estimates, such as the choice of star-formation history (SFH) priors (constant versus rising SFH base for the non-parametric SFH prior), the dust attenuation law, and the treatment of emission line fluxes. Our analysis yields revised stellar masses of $\log_{10}(M_{\star}/M_{\odot}) \approx 10.36, 10.95$ and $10.31$ for S1, S2, and S3, respectively. We find that adopting a rising SFH base prior results in lower inferred stellar masses compared to a constant SFH base prior. Additionally, we identify a significant degeneracy between the dust attenuation curve slope, the amount of dust attenuation, and stellar mass. Our results highlight various systematics in SED modelling due to SFH priors and dust attenuation that can influence stellar mass estimates. Nevertheless, even with these revised stellar mass estimates, two of the three galaxies remain among the most massive and actively star-forming systems at their respective redshifts, implying high star-formation efficiencies.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Recent studies using JWST have suggested that some high-redshift galaxies may be ultra-massive, thereby challenging standard models of early galaxy formation. | background 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.03 | hedged possibility 0.98 |
| s1 | We analyse the stellar masses using different modelling assumptions and in conjunction with new data of three galaxies (S1, S2 and S3), whose photometric and NIRCam/grism redshifts were consistent with $z>5$. | contribution 0.54 | 0.93 | 0.03 | asserted 0.96 |
| s2 | These three ``optically dark'' galaxies were reported to host exceptionally high stellar masses ($M_{\star}\gtrsim10^{11}~M_{\odot}$) and star-formation rates ($\mathrm{SFR}\gtrsim600~M_{\odot}~\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$), implying extremely high star-formation efficiencies. | background 0.96 | 0.07 | 0.05 | asserted 0.94 |
| s3 | Recent NIRSpec/IFU observations for S1 indicate a spectroscopic redshift of $z_{\rm spec}=3.2439\pm0.0002$, revising the previous redshift. | result 0.90 | 0.62 | 0.03 | asserted 0.60 |
| s4 | Using the Bayesian spectral energy distribution (SED) modelling tool \texttt{Prospector}, we investigate the impact of key model assumptions on stellar mass estimates, such as the choice of star-formation history (SFH) priors (constant versus rising SFH base for the non-parametric SFH prior), the dust attenuation law, and the treatment of emission line fluxes. | method 0.97 | 0.91 | 0.05 | asserted 0.94 |
| s5 | Our analysis yields revised stellar masses of $\log_{10}(M_{\star}/M_{\odot}) \approx 10.36, 10.95$ and $10.31$ for S1, S2, and S3, respectively. | result 1.00 | 0.97 | 0.20 | asserted 0.98 |
| s6 | We find that adopting a rising SFH base prior results in lower inferred stellar masses compared to a constant SFH base prior. | result 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.12 | asserted 1.00 |
| s7 | Additionally, we identify a significant degeneracy between the dust attenuation curve slope, the amount of dust attenuation, and stellar mass. | result 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.17 | asserted 1.00 |
| s8 | Our results highlight various systematics in SED modelling due to SFH priors and dust attenuation that can influence stellar mass estimates. | interpretation 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.33 | asserted 0.97 |
| s9 | Nevertheless, even with these revised stellar mass estimates, two of the three galaxies remain among the most massive and actively star-forming systems at their respective redshifts, implying high star-formation efficiencies. | interpretation 0.96 | 0.85 | 0.51 | asserted 0.96 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v3
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Recent studies using JWST have suggested that some high-redshift galaxies may be ultra-massive, thereby challenging standard models of early galaxy formation. We analyse the stellar masses using different modelling assumptions and in conjunction with new data of three galaxies (S1, S2 and S3), whose photometric and NIRCam/grism redshifts were consistent with $z>5$. These three ``optically dark'' galaxies were reported to host exceptionally high stellar masses ($M_{\star}\gtrsim10^{11}~M_{\odot}$) and star-formation rates ($\mathrm{SFR}\gtrsim600~M_{\odot}~\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$), implying extremely high star-formation efficiencies. Recent NIRSpec/IFU observations for S1 indicate a spectroscopic redshift of $z_{\rm spec}=3.2439\pm0.0002$, revising the previous redshift. Using the Bayesian spectral energy distribution (SED) modelling tool \texttt{Prospector}, we investigate the impact of key model assumptions on stellar mass estimates, such as the choice of star-formation history (SFH) priors (constant versus rising SFH base for the non-parametric SFH prior), the dust attenuation law, and the treatment of emission line fluxes. Our analysis yields revised stellar masses of $\log_{10}(M_{\star}/M_{\odot}) \approx 10.36, 10.95$ and $10.31$ for S1, S2, and S3, respectively. We find that adopting a rising SFH base prior results in lower inferred stellar masses compared to a constant SFH base prior. Additionally, we identify a significant degeneracy between the dust attenuation curve slope, the amount of dust attenuation, and stellar mass. Our results highlight various systematics in SED modelling due to SFH priors and dust attenuation that can influence stellar mass estimates. Nevertheless, even with these revised stellar mass estimates, two of the three galaxies remain among the most massive and actively star-forming systems at their respective redshifts, implying high star-formation efficiencies.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
What it cites · 6 sentences without a confident label
Uses data or values from 1 paper
-
In addition to the FRESCO data [ref] , we incorporate observations from the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey [ref] .
Overview of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES) · Observational data · 0.98
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.