pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.12188 · v2 · pith:DS2URKPGnew · submitted 2026-01-17 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

Accurate starting points for one-shot G₀W₀ and Bethe-Salpeter Equation calculations via effective tuning of range-separated hybrid functionals

Aditi Singh , Subrata Jana , Szymon \'Smiga This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 12:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords range-separated hybrid functionalsG0W0Bethe-Salpeter equationeffective tuningionization potentialsexcitation energiesstarting point dependencedensity functional theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Simplified effective tuning of range-separated hybrid functionals delivers accurate starting points for G0W0 and BSE calculations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper demonstrates that a simplified effective tuning protocol for the range-separation parameter in range-separated hybrid density functionals can replace more computationally demanding optimal tuning methods. The resulting tuned functionals produce orbital energies and wavefunctions that serve as high-quality starting points for many-body perturbation theory calculations. When used in one-shot G0W0, these starting points accurately reproduce reference ionization potentials across various molecules and clusters. Subsequent Bethe-Salpeter equation calculations then deliver reliable neutral excitation energies and optical spectra. This approach reduces the computational cost while maintaining the accuracy needed for routine applications of these advanced methods.

Core claim

The authors establish that the effective tuning protocol for range-separated hybrid functionals yields range-separation parameters effectively equivalent to those from more elaborate tuning strategies. This allows the tuned RSH eigensystems to provide reliable starting points for many-body perturbation theory. Specifically, one-shot G0W0 calculations based on these orbitals reproduce reference ionization potentials with high accuracy, and subsequent BSE calculations yield quantitatively reliable neutral excitation energies, optical absorption spectra, and excitonic properties for diverse molecular systems and clusters.

What carries the argument

The effective tuning protocol for determining the range-separation parameter omega in range-separated hybrid functionals, which avoids multi-step system-specific optimizations.

If this is right

  • One-shot G0W0 calculations based on effectively tuned RSH orbitals reproduce reference ionization potentials with high accuracy.
  • Subsequent BSE calculations yield quantitatively reliable neutral excitation energies, optical absorption spectra, and excitonic properties for a diverse set of molecular systems and clusters.
  • The method combines the accuracy of optimally tuned starting points with low computational cost.
  • Effective RSH tuning offers a practical and broadly applicable route to accurate quasiparticle and excited-state calculations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This could allow routine application of accurate excited-state calculations to larger molecular systems that were previously too costly to treat with optimal tuning.
  • The simplified protocol might extend to other many-body methods or be combined with different density functional approximations to further improve starting points.
  • Transferability testing on periodic solids or much larger clusters would be a natural next step to check if the efficiency gains hold beyond the molecular cases studied.

Load-bearing premise

The range-separation parameters from the effective tuning protocol maintain their quality when directly used in G0W0 and BSE calculations without needing additional system-specific adjustments.

What would settle it

A clear falsifier would be finding a molecular system where the ionization potentials from G0W0 using these tuned starting points show large errors compared to reference values, or where BSE excitation energies deviate substantially from experiment or higher-level calculations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.12188 by Aditi Singh, Subrata Jana, Szymon \'Smiga.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The figure shows the results of the tuning procedure from Eq. 3, with all parameters given in bohr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. An illustration of how the variation of omega impacts IP’s, we also present the cases where [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Visualization of the frontier molecular orbitals (HOMO and LUMO) for Uracil and Butadiene. The plots illustrate the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The range separation parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. A comparison of the photoabsorption spectra for silicon clusters calculated with TDDFT (left panel) and the many [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The accuracy of one-shot $G_0W_0$ and Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) calculations depends strongly on the underlying starting-point eigensystem, which is commonly obtained from a mean-field density-functional approximation. Range-separated hybrid (RSH) functionals provide a particularly effective starting point, however, conventional optimally tuned RSH procedures often require costly, system-specific, multi-step optimizations of the range-separation parameter $\omega$. In this work, we show that a recently proposed effective tuning protocol [Singh \textit{et. al.}, Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 16, 32, 8198-8208, (2025)] for RSH functionals can serve as an efficient alternative for determining $\omega$ used in $G_0W_0$ and BSE calculations. This simplified tuning scheme yields range-separation parameters that are effectively equivalent to those obtained from more elaborate tuning strategies, while avoiding their substantial computational overhead. The resulting tuned RSH eigensystems provide reliable starting points for many-body perturbation theory. In particular, one-shot $G_0W_0$ calculations based on effectively tuned RSH orbitals reproduce reference ionization potentials with high accuracy, while subsequent BSE calculations yield quantitatively reliable neutral excitation energies, optical absorption spectra, and excitonic properties for a diverse set of molecular systems and clusters. These results demonstrate that effective RSH tuning offers a practical and broadly applicable route to accurate quasiparticle and excited-state calculations, combining the accuracy of optimally tuned starting points with the low computational cost required for routine applications of $G_0W_0$ and BSE.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that a recently introduced effective tuning protocol for the range-separation parameter ω in range-separated hybrid (RSH) functionals provides values effectively equivalent to those from conventional optimal tuning, thereby supplying reliable, low-cost starting points for one-shot G0W0 and Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) calculations. It asserts that the resulting RSH eigensystems yield G0W0 ionization potentials in high agreement with reference values and BSE neutral excitation energies, absorption spectra, and excitonic properties that are quantitatively reliable across a diverse set of molecular systems and clusters.

Significance. If the equivalence and transferability claims are substantiated, the work would provide a practical route to accurate many-body perturbation theory calculations by eliminating the computational overhead of system-specific multi-step ω optimizations. This could broaden routine use of G0W0 and BSE while retaining the accuracy advantages of tuned RSH starting points. The extension of the effective-tuning approach to MBPT is a clear incremental contribution, though its impact hinges on quantitative validation of the preserved quality.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results section (application to G0W0 and BSE)] The central claim that effective tuning produces ω values whose quality is preserved when used directly as G0W0/BSE starting points (without additional verification) is load-bearing yet unsupported by direct evidence. No side-by-side tabulation of ω values from the effective protocol versus IP- or eigenvalue-tuned references appears for the studied systems, nor are ΔIP or ΔE_exc differences between the two routes reported to demonstrate that small deviations in ω do not propagate into meaningful changes in quasiparticle energies or spectra.
  2. [Abstract and Results/Discussion] The assertions of 'high accuracy' for G0W0 IPs and 'quantitatively reliable' BSE results on diverse systems lack accompanying error metrics, mean absolute deviations, or comparisons against optimally tuned baselines and experimental references. Without these, the performance claims cannot be evaluated and the transferability of the 2025 effective-tuning protocol remains unverified in the MBPT context.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] Define all acronyms (RSH, G0W0, BSE, MBPT) at first use in the main text for clarity.
  2. [References] Ensure the reference to Singh et al. (J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2025) includes complete bibliographic details and is cited consistently when the effective-tuning procedure is invoked.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to provide additional quantitative support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section (application to G0W0 and BSE)] The central claim that effective tuning produces ω values whose quality is preserved when used directly as G0W0/BSE starting points (without additional verification) is load-bearing yet unsupported by direct evidence. No side-by-side tabulation of ω values from the effective protocol versus IP- or eigenvalue-tuned references appears for the studied systems, nor are ΔIP or ΔE_exc differences between the two routes reported to demonstrate that small deviations in ω do not propagate into meaningful changes in quasiparticle energies or spectra.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point. Upon reflection, while our figures illustrate the close agreement between the effective tuning and conventional methods through the resulting G0W0 and BSE results, we agree that an explicit side-by-side comparison would better substantiate the equivalence. In the revised manuscript, we will include a table listing the ω values obtained from the effective protocol and from IP-tuning for each system studied, along with the corresponding G0W0 ionization potentials and BSE excitation energies to show the small differences and their impact. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and Results/Discussion] The assertions of 'high accuracy' for G0W0 IPs and 'quantitatively reliable' BSE results on diverse systems lack accompanying error metrics, mean absolute deviations, or comparisons against optimally tuned baselines and experimental references. Without these, the performance claims cannot be evaluated and the transferability of the 2025 effective-tuning protocol remains unverified in the MBPT context.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript would benefit from more explicit quantitative metrics to support the accuracy claims. Although the results section presents individual comparisons and visual agreements with references, we will add a summary table or section reporting mean absolute deviations (MADs) for the G0W0 IPs relative to experimental or high-level reference values, and similarly for BSE neutral excitation energies. This will include comparisons to both the effectively tuned and optimally tuned starting points to demonstrate the transferability. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Self-citation underpins equivalence claim for effective tuning, but MBPT benchmarks provide independent content

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "we show that a recently proposed effective tuning protocol [Singh et. al., Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 16, 32, 8198-8208, (2025)] for RSH functionals can serve as an efficient alternative for determining ω used in G0W0 and BSE calculations. This simplified tuning scheme yields range-separation parameters that are effectively equivalent to those obtained from more elaborate tuning strategies, while avoiding their substantial computational overhead."

    The equivalence between effective and elaborate tuning parameters is justified solely by citation to prior work sharing the first author. The manuscript's central premise that these parameters furnish reliable MBPT starting points therefore inherits its justification from the self-cited result rather than from direct verification or new derivation within the present text.

full rationale

The manuscript applies the effective tuning protocol from the authors' own 2025 JPC Lett. paper to G0W0 and BSE calculations and reports accuracy against reference ionization potentials and excitation energies for molecular systems. This application and the associated numerical results constitute independent content. However, the load-bearing assertion that the resulting range-separation parameters are 'effectively equivalent' to those from conventional optimal tuning rests on the self-citation without new side-by-side ω comparisons or error-metric tables in the present work. Per the guidelines, this qualifies as moderate self-citation load-bearing rather than full reduction of the central claim to a fit or definition. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or ansatz-smuggling patterns appear in the provided derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the effective-tuning protocol from the authors' prior publication and on standard domain assumptions that properly tuned RSH orbitals form good starting points for G0W0 and BSE; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the range-separation parameter whose value is obtained by the cited protocol.

free parameters (1)
  • range-separation parameter omega
    Determined via the effective tuning protocol; its specific numerical value for each molecule is not a new fitted constant but is inherited from the prior tuning scheme.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Range-separated hybrid functionals, when their range-separation parameter is chosen appropriately, supply eigensystems that serve as reliable starting points for one-shot G0W0 and BSE calculations.
    This premise is invoked throughout the abstract as the justification for using the tuned RSH orbitals.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5847 in / 1555 out tokens · 64854 ms · 2026-05-22T12:36:07.631793+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 125 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Albrecht, L

    Stefan Albrecht, Lucia Reining, Rodolfo Del Sole, et al. Ab Initio Calculation of Excitonic Effects in the Optical Spectra of Semiconductors.Phys. Rev. Lett., 80:4510–4513, May 1998. URL:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4510,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.80.4510

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.4510 1998

  2. [2]

    E. Aprá, E. J. Bylaska, W. A. de Jong, et al. NWChem: Past, present, and future.The Journal of Chemi- cal Physics, 152(18):184102, 05 2020.doi:10.1063/5. 0004997

    work page doi:10.1063/5 2020

  3. [3]

    Hybrid density functional theory meets quasiparticle calcula- tions: A consistent electronic structure approach.Phys

    Viktor Atalla, Mina Yoon, Fabio Caruso, et al. Hybrid density functional theory meets quasiparticle calcula- tions: A consistent electronic structure approach.Phys. Rev. B, 88:165122, Oct 2013. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.165122,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.88.165122

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.165122 2013

  4. [4]

    Tuned Range-Separated Hybrids in Density Func- tional Theory.Annual Review of Physical Chem- istry, 61(Volume 61, 2010):85–109, 2010

    Roi Baer, Ester Livshits, and Ulrike Salzner. Tuned Range-Separated Hybrids in Density Func- tional Theory.Annual Review of Physical Chem- istry, 61(Volume 61, 2010):85–109, 2010. URL: https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/ 10.1146/annurev.physchem.012809.103321, doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.012809.103321

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.012809.103321 2010

  5. [5]

    Density-functional thermochemistry

    Axel D Becke. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange.J. Chem. Phys., 98(7):5648– 5652, 1993

    work page 1993

  6. [6]

    Ac- celerating large-scale excited-state GW calculations on leadership HPC systems

    Mauro Del Ben, Charlene Yang, Zhenglu Li, et al. Ac- celerating large-scale excited-state GW calculations on leadership HPC systems. InProceedings of the Inter- national Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, SC ’20. IEEE Press, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [9]

    Bruneval, N

    Fabien Bruneval, Nike Dattani, and Michiel J. van Setten. The GW Miracle in Many-Body Perturbation Theory for the Ionization Potential of Molecules.Frontiers in Chemistry, 9, 2021. URL:https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/ chemistry/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.749779, doi:10.3389/fchem.2021.749779

    work page doi:10.3389/fchem.2021.749779 2021

  8. [11]

    Fabien Bruneval and Miguel A. L. Marques. Bench- marking the Starting Points of the GW Approximation for Molecules.Journal of Chemical Theory and Compu- tation, 9(1):324–329, 2013.doi:10.1021/ct300835h

    work page doi:10.1021/ct300835h 2013

  9. [12]

    Hamed, et al

    Fabien Bruneval, Tonatiuh Rangel, Samia M. Hamed, et al. molgw 1: Many-body perturbation the- ory software for atoms, molecules, and clusters. Computer Physics Communications, 208:149– 161, 2016. URL:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0010465516301990, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.06.019

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.06.019 2016

  10. [13]

    Ef- fect of self-consistency on quasiparticles in solids.Phys

    Fabien Bruneval, Nathalie Vast, and Lucia Reining. Ef- fect of self-consistency on quasiparticles in solids.Phys. Rev. B, 74:045102, Jul 2006. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.045102,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.74.045102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.045102 2006

  11. [14]

    Perspective on density functional theory

    Kieron Burke. Perspective on density functional theory. J. Chem. Phys., 136(15):150901, 2012

    work page 2012

  12. [15]

    L. T. Canham. Silicon quantum wire array fabrication by electrochemical and chemical dissolution of wafers. Applied Physics Letters, 57(10):1046–1048, 09 1990. arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/aip/apl/article-pdf/ 57/10/1046/18478329/1046_1_online.pdf, doi:10.1063/1.103561

    work page doi:10.1063/1.103561 1990

  13. [17]

    CASIDA.Time-Dependent Density Func- tional Response Theory for Molecules, pages 155–192

    MARK E. CASIDA.Time-Dependent Density Func- tional Response Theory for Molecules, pages 155–192

    work page

  14. [18]

    Casida, Christine Jamorski, Kim C

    Mark E. Casida, Christine Jamorski, Kim C. Casida, et al. Molecular excitation energies to high-lying bound states from time-dependent density-functional response theory: Characterization and correction of the time-dependent local density approximation ion- ization threshold.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 108(11):4439–4449, 03 1998.doi:10.1063/1.475855

    work page doi:10.1063/1.475855 1998

  15. [19]

    Casida and M

    M.E. Casida and M. Huix-Rotllant. Progress in Time- Dependent Density-Functional Theory.Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 63(Volume 63, 2012):287–323, 2012

    work page 2012

  16. [20]

    Nonempirical dielectric-dependent hybrid func- tional with range separation for semiconductors and in- sulators.Phys

    Wei Chen, Giacomo Miceli, Gian-Marco Rignanese, et al. Nonempirical dielectric-dependent hybrid func- tional with range separation for semiconductors and in- sulators.Phys. Rev. Mater., 2:073803, Jul 2018

    work page 2018

  17. [22]

    Many-body theory beyond GW: Towards a complete description of two- body correlated propagation.Phys

    Brian Cunningham. Many-body theory beyond GW: Towards a complete description of two- body correlated propagation.Phys. Rev. Res., 6:043277, Dec 2024. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043277, doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.043277. 12

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043277 2024

  18. [23]

    Delerue, M

    C. Delerue, M. Lannoo, and G. Allan. Excitonic and Quasiparticle Gaps in Si Nanocrystals.Phys. Rev. Lett., 84:2457–2460, Mar 2000. URL:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2457,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.84.2457

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2457 2000

  19. [25]

    Strubbe, et al

    Jack Deslippe, Georgy Samsonidze, David A. Strubbe, et al. BerkeleyGW: A massively parallel computer package for the calculation of the quasiparticle and optical properties of materials and nanostructures. Computer Physics Communications, 183(6):1269– 1289, 2012. URL:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0010465511003912, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2011.12.006 2012

  20. [26]

    Weisman, and Martin Head-Gordon

    Andreas Dreuw, Jennifer L. Weisman, and Martin Head-Gordon. Long-rangecharge-transferexcitedstates in time-dependent density functional theory require non-local exchange.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 119(6):2943–2946, 08 2003.doi:10.1063/1.1590951

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1590951 2003

  21. [27]

    Ivan Duchemin and Xavier Blase. Cubic-Scaling All- Electron GW Calculations with a Separable Density- Fitting Space-Time Approach.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 17(4):2383–2393, 2021.doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00101

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00101 2021

  22. [28]

    Ivan Duchemin, Denis Jacquemin, and Xavier Blase. Combining theGWformalism with the polarizable continuum model: A state-specific non-equilibrium approach.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 144(16):164106, 04 2016.doi:10.1063/1.4946778

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4946778 2016

  23. [29]

    Dunning, Thom H

    Jr. Dunning, Thom H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron throughneonandhydrogen.J. Chem. Phy., 90(2):1007– 1023, 01 1989

    work page 1989

  24. [30]

    Quantum embedding theory in the screened Coulomb interaction: Combining configuration interaction withGW/BSE.Phys

    Marc Dvorak, Dorothea Golze, and Patrick Rinke. Quantum embedding theory in the screened Coulomb interaction: Combining configuration interaction withGW/BSE.Phys. Rev. Mater., 3:070801, Jul 2019. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.070801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.070801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.070801 2019

  25. [31]

    Faber, P

    C. Faber, P. Boulanger, C. Attaccalite, et al. Ex- cited states properties of organic molecules: from density functional theory to theGWand Bethe- Salpeter Green’s function formalisms.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(2011):20130271,

    work page 2011

  26. [32]

    org/doi/abs/10.1098/rsta.2013.0271,doi:10.1098/ rsta.2013.0271

    URL:https://royalsocietypublishing. org/doi/abs/10.1098/rsta.2013.0271,doi:10.1098/ rsta.2013.0271

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2013.0271 2013

  27. [34]

    Three- dimensional quantum well effects in ultrafine sili- con particles.Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 27(11A):L2207, nov 1988.doi:10.1143/JJAP.27

    Shoji Furukawa and Tatsuro Miyasato. Three- dimensional quantum well effects in ultrafine sili- con particles.Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 27(11A):L2207, nov 1988.doi:10.1143/JJAP.27. L2207

    work page doi:10.1143/jjap.27 1988

  28. [35]

    Gant, Jonah B

    Stephen E. Gant, Jonah B. Haber, Marina R. Filip, et al. Optimally tuned starting point for single- shotGWcalculations of solids.Phys. Rev. Mater., 6:053802, May 2022. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.053802,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.053802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.6.053802 2022

  29. [36]

    Effi- cient Full-Frequency GW Calculations Using a Lanc- zos Method.Phys

    Weiwei Gao, Zhao Tang, Jijun Zhao, et al. Effi- cient Full-Frequency GW Calculations Using a Lanc- zos Method.Phys. Rev. Lett., 132:126402, Mar

    work page

  30. [39]

    Garai, S

    Soumen Ghosh, Pragya Verma, Christopher J. Cramer, et al. Combining Wave Function Methods with Den- sity Functional Theory for Excited States.Chemical Reviews, 118(15):7249–7292, 2018.doi:10.1021/acs. chemrev.8b00193

    work page doi:10.1021/acs 2018

  31. [40]

    Andrew T. B. Gilbert, Nicholas A. Besley, and Pe- ter M. W. Gill. Self-Consistent Field Calculations of Excited States Using the Maximum Overlap Method (MOM).The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 112(50):13164–13171, 2008.doi:10.1021/jp801738f

    work page doi:10.1021/jp801738f 2008

  32. [41]

    The GW Compendium: A Practical Guide to Theoreti- cal Photoemission Spectroscopy.Frontiers in Chem- istry, 7, 2019

    Dorothea Golze, Marc Dvorak, and Patrick Rinke. The GW Compendium: A Practical Guide to Theoreti- cal Photoemission Spectroscopy.Frontiers in Chem- istry, 7, 2019. URL:https://www.frontiersin.org/ articles/10.3389/fchem.2019.00377,doi:10.3389/ fchem.2019.00377

    work page doi:10.3389/fchem.2019.00377 2019

  33. [42]

    New Method for Calculating the One- Particle Green’s Function with Application to the Electron-Gas Problem.Phys

    Lars Hedin. New Method for Calculating the One- Particle Green’s Function with Application to the Electron-Gas Problem.Phys. Rev., 139:A796–A823, Aug 1965. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRev.139.A796,doi:10.1103/PhysRev.139.A796

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.139.a796 1965

  34. [43]

    On correlation effects in electron spectroscopies and the GW approximation.Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 11(42):R489, oct

    Lars Hedin. On correlation effects in electron spectroscopies and the GW approximation.Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 11(42):R489, oct

    work page

  35. [44]

    URL:https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/ 11/42/201,doi:10.1088/0953-8984/11/42/201

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/

  36. [45]

    Mario Hernández Vera and Thomas-C. Jagau. Resolution-of-the-identity approximation for complex- scaled basis functions.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 151(11):111101, 09 2019.arXiv:https: //pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article-pdf/doi/10. 1063/1.5119695/13540625/111101_1_online.pdf, doi:10.1063/1.5119695

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5119695 2019

  37. [46]

    Scuseria

    Jochen Heyd and Gustavo E. Scuseria. Efficient hybrid density functional calculations in solids: Assessment of the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof screened Coulomb hybrid functional.J. Chem. Phys., 121(3):1187–1192, 2004

    work page 2004

  38. [47]

    Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential.J

    Jochen Heyd, Gustavo E Scuseria, and Matthias Ernz- erhof. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential.J. Chem. Phys., 118(18):8207–8215, 2003

    work page 2003

  39. [48]

    Time-dependent density functional theory within the Tamm-Dancoff ap- proximation.Chemical Physics Letters, 314(3):291– 299, 1999

    So Hirata and Martin Head-Gordon. Time-dependent density functional theory within the Tamm-Dancoff ap- proximation.Chemical Physics Letters, 314(3):291– 299, 1999. URL:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0009261499011495,doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)01149-5. 13

    work page doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(99)01149-5 1999

  40. [50]

    Thyge- sen

    Falco Hüser, Thomas Olsen, and Kristian S. Thyge- sen. Quasiparticle GW calculations for solids, molecules, and two-dimensional materials.Phys. Rev. B, 87:235132, Jun 2013. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.235132,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.87.235132

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.235132 2013

  41. [51]

    Hybertsen and Steven G

    Mark S. Hybertsen and Steven G. Louie. First- Principles Theory of Quasiparticles: Calculation of Band Gaps in Semiconductors and Insulators.Phys. Rev. Lett., 55:1418–1421, Sep 1985. URL:https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1418, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1418

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.55.1418 1985

  42. [52]

    Hybertsen and Steven G

    Mark S. Hybertsen and Steven G. Louie. Electron cor- relation in semiconductors and insulators: Band gaps and quasiparticle energies.Phys. Rev. B, 34:5390–5413, Oct 1986. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.34.5390,doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.34.5390

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.34.5390 1986

  43. [54]

    Constantin, et al

    Subrata Jana, Arghya Ghosh, Lucian A. Constantin, et al. Simple and effective screening parameter for range-separated dielectric-dependent hybrids.Phys. Rev. B, 108:045101, Jul 2023. URL:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.045101,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevB.108.045101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.045101 2023

  44. [55]

    Constantin, et al

    Subrata Jana, Abhilash Patra, Lucian A. Constantin, et al. Long-range screened hybrid-functional theory sat- isfying the local-density linear response.Phys. Rev. A, 99:042515, Apr 2019

    work page 2019

  45. [56]

    Constantin, et al

    Subrata Jana, Abhilash Patra, Lucian A. Constantin, et al. Screened range-separated hybrid by balancing the compact and slowly varying density regimes: Satisfac- tion of local density linear response.J. Chem. Phys., 152(4):044111, 2020

    work page 2020

  46. [58]

    Im- proved solid stability from a screened range-separated hybrid functional by satisfying semiclassical atom the- ory and local density linear response.Phys

    Subrata Jana, Bikash Patra, Szymon Śmiga, et al. Im- proved solid stability from a screened range-separated hybrid functional by satisfying semiclassical atom the- ory and local density linear response.Phys. Rev. B, 102:155107, Oct 2020

    work page 2020

  47. [59]

    A meta-GGA level screened range-separated hybrid functional by employ- ing short range Hartree-Fock with a long range semilo- calfunctional.Phys

    Subrata Jana and Prasanjit Samal. A meta-GGA level screened range-separated hybrid functional by employ- ing short range Hartree-Fock with a long range semilo- calfunctional.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 20:8999–9005, 2018

    work page 2018

  48. [60]

    Screened hy- brid meta-GGA exchange-correlation functionals for ex- tended systems.Phys

    Subrata Jana and Prasanjit Samal. Screened hy- brid meta-GGA exchange-correlation functionals for ex- tended systems.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 21:3002– 3015, 2019. URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ C8CP06715E,doi:10.1039/C8CP06715E

    work page doi:10.1039/c8cp06715e 2019

  49. [61]

    Gomez-Abal, Patrick Rinke, et al

    Hong Jiang, Ricardo I. Gomez-Abal, Patrick Rinke, et al. Localized and Itinerant States in Lanthanide Oxides United byGW@ LDA +U.Phys. Rev. Lett., 102:126403, Mar 2009. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.126403,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.102.126403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.126403 2009

  50. [63]

    Andreas Karolewski, Leeor Kronik, and Stephan Küm- mel. Using optimally tuned range separated hy- brid functionals in ground-state calculations: Conse- quences and caveats.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 138(20):204115, 05 2013.doi:10.1063/1.4807325

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4807325 2013

  51. [64]

    Co- hen, et al.GWquasiparticle corrections to theLDA + UGGA +Uelectronic structure of bcc hydrogen.Phys

    Emmanouil Kioupakis, Peihong Zhang, Marvin L. Co- hen, et al.GWquasiparticle corrections to theLDA + UGGA +Uelectronic structure of bcc hydrogen.Phys. Rev. B, 77:155114, Apr 2008. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.155114,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.77.155114

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.155114 2008

  52. [66]

    Harding, and Wim Klop- per

    Katharina Krause, Michael E. Harding, and Wim Klop- per. Coupled-cluster reference values for the GW27 and GW100 test sets for the assessment of GW meth- ods.Molecular Physics, 113(13-14):1952–1960, 2015. doi:10.1080/00268976.2015.1025113

    work page doi:10.1080/00268976.2015.1025113 1952

  53. [67]

    Dielectric Screen- ing Meets Optimally Tuned Density Functionals.Ad- vanced Materials, 30(41):1706560, 2018

    Leeor Kronik and Stephan Kümmel. Dielectric Screen- ing Meets Optimally Tuned Density Functionals.Ad- vanced Materials, 30(41):1706560, 2018

    work page 2018

  54. [68]

    Excitation Gaps of Finite-Sized Systems from Optimally Tuned Range-Separated Hybrid Function- als.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 8(5):1515–1531, 2012

    Leeor Kronik, Tamar Stein, Sivan Refaely-Abramson, et al. Excitation Gaps of Finite-Sized Systems from Optimally Tuned Range-Separated Hybrid Function- als.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 8(5):1515–1531, 2012

    work page 2012

  55. [69]

    Influence of the exchange screening pa- rameterontheperformanceofscreenedhybridfunction- als.J

    Aliaksandr V Krukau, Oleg A Vydrov, Artur F Iz- maylov, et al. Influence of the exchange screening pa- rameterontheperformanceofscreenedhybridfunction- als.J. Chem. Phys., 125(22):224106, 2006

    work page 2006

  56. [70]

    A critical evaluation of the hybrid ks dft functionals based on the ks exchange-correlation potentials.The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 15(40):10219–10229, 2024

    Vignesh Balaji Kumar, Szymon Śmiga, and Ireneusz Grabowski. A critical evaluation of the hybrid ks dft functionals based on the ks exchange-correlation potentials.The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 15(40):10219–10229, 2024. PMID: 39356205.arXiv: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01979, doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01979

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01979 2024

  57. [71]

    Devel- opment of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density.Phys

    Chengteh Lee, Weitao Yang, and Robert G Parr. Devel- opment of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density.Phys. Rev. B, 37(2):785, 1988

    work page 1988

  58. [72]

    Xia Leng, Fan Jin, Min Wei, et al.GWmethod and Bethe−Salpeterequation for calculating electronic ex- citations.WIREs Computational Molecular Science, 6(5):532–550, 2016.doi:10.1002/wcms.1265

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1265 2016

  59. [74]

    A comprehensive review on the synthe- sis methods and applications of silicon quantum dots (siqds).Next Nanotechnology, 7:100144,

    Ruonan Li, Jian Xu, Xiqiong Mu, and Fankui Zeng. A comprehensive review on the synthe- sis methods and applications of silicon quantum dots (siqds).Next Nanotechnology, 7:100144,

    work page

  60. [75]

    com/science/article/pii/S2949829525000130, doi:10.1016/j.nxnano.2025.100144

    URL:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S2949829525000130, doi:10.1016/j.nxnano.2025.100144

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nxnano.2025.100144 2025

  61. [76]

    Chi Liu, Jan Kloppenburg, Yi Yao, et al. All-electron ab initio Bethe-Salpeter equation approach to neutral excitations in molecules with numeric atom-centered or- bitals.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 152(4):044105, 01 2020.doi:10.1063/1.5123290

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5123290 2020

  62. [78]

    Louie and Mark S

    Steven G. Louie and Mark S. Hybertsen. Theory of quasiparticleenergies: Bandgapsandexcitationspectra in solids.International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 32(S21):31–44, 1987.doi:10.1002/qua.560320706

    work page doi:10.1002/qua.560320706 1987

  63. [79]

    Louie and Angel Rubio.Quasiparti- cle and Optical Properties of Solids and Nanos- tructures: The GW-BSE Approach, pages 215–240

    Steven G. Louie and Angel Rubio.Quasiparti- cle and Optical Properties of Solids and Nanos- tructures: The GW-BSE Approach, pages 215–240. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2005. URL:https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3286-8%5F12,doi:10. 1007/978-1-4020-3286-8_12

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-3286-8 2005

  64. [80]

    Neepa T. Maitra. Perspective: Fundamental aspects of time-dependent density functional theory.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 144(22):220901, 06 2016.doi:10. 1063/1.4953039

    work page 2016

  65. [81]

    Bench- mark ofGWmethods for azabenzenes.Phys

    Noa Marom, Fabio Caruso, Xinguo Ren, et al. Bench- mark ofGWmethods for azabenzenes.Phys. Rev. B, 86:245127, Dec 2012. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.245127,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.86.245127

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.245127 2012

  66. [82]

    Spinorial formulation of theGW- BSE equations and spin properties of excitons in two- dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides.Phys

    Margherita Marsili, Alejandro Molina-Sánchez, Maur- izia Palummo, et al. Spinorial formulation of theGW- BSE equations and spin properties of excitons in two- dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides.Phys. Rev. B, 103:155152, Apr 2021. URL:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.155152,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevB.103.155152

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.155152 2021

  67. [84]

    McKeon, Samia M

    Caroline A. McKeon, Samia M. Hamed, Fabien Bruneval, et al. An optimally tuned range-separated hybrid starting point for ab initio GW plus Bethe- Salpeter equation calculations of molecules.The Jour- nal of Chemical Physics, 157(7):074103, 08 2022.doi: 10.1063/5.0097582

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0097582 2022

  68. [85]

    Scalable Molecular GW Calculations: Va- lence and Core Spectra.Journal of Chemical The- ory and Computation, 17(12):7504–7517, 2021.doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00738

    Daniel Mejia-Rodriguez, Alexander Kunitsa, Edoardo Aprá, et al. Scalable Molecular GW Calculations: Va- lence and Core Spectra.Journal of Chemical The- ory and Computation, 17(12):7504–7517, 2021.doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00738

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00738 2021

  69. [86]

    III Minnette, Erik P

    William E. III Minnette, Erik P. Hoy, and Andrew M. Sand. The use of effective core potentials with multi- configuration pair-density functional theory.The Jour- nal of Physical Chemistry A, 128(31):6555–6565, 2024. PMID: 39052857.arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1021/ acs.jpca.4c02666,doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.4c02666

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.4c02666 2024

  70. [87]

    Quasiparticle energy of semicoredelectrons inZnS: CombinedLDA +UandGWapproach.Phys

    TakashiMiyake, PeihongZhang, MarvinL.Cohen, etal. Quasiparticle energy of semicoredelectrons inZnS: CombinedLDA +UandGWapproach.Phys. Rev. B, 74:245213, Dec 2006. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.245213,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.74.245213

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.74.245213 2006

  71. [88]

    Koichi Momma and Fujio Izumi.VESTA: a three- dimensional visualization system for electronic and structural analysis.Journal of Applied Crystallography, 41(3):653–658, Jun 2008

    work page 2008

  72. [89]

    Cohen, and Weitao Yang

    Paula Mori-Sánchez, Aron J. Cohen, and Weitao Yang. Localization and Delocalization Errors in Den- sity Functional Theory and Implications for Band- Gap Prediction.Phys. Rev. Lett., 100:146401, Apr

    work page

  73. [91]

    F. Neese. Software update: the orca program system, version 5.0.WIRES Comput. Molec. Sci., 12(1):e1606, 2022

    work page 2022

  74. [92]

    Breaking the Theoretical Scaling Limit for Predicting Quasiparticle Energies: The Stochastic GWApproach.Phys

    Daniel Neuhauser, Yi Gao, Christopher Arntsen, et al. Breaking the Theoretical Scaling Limit for Predicting Quasiparticle Energies: The Stochastic GWApproach.Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:076402, Aug

    work page

  75. [94]

    Chelikowsky, and Steven G

    Serdar Ögüt, James R. Chelikowsky, and Steven G. Louie. Optical Properties of Silicon Nanocrystals: A First Principles Study.MRS Online Proceed- ings Library, 579(1):81–89, Dec 1999.doi:10.1557/ PROC-579-81

    work page 1999

  76. [95]

    Gant, et al

    Guy Ohad, Dahvyd Wing, Stephen E. Gant, et al. Band gapsofhalideperovskitesfromaWannier-localizedopti- mallytunedscreenedrange-separatedhybridfunctional. Phys. Rev. Mater., 6:104606, Oct 2022

    work page 2022

  77. [96]

    Chelikowsky, and Steven G

    Serdar Öğüt, James R. Chelikowsky, and Steven G. Louie. Quantum Confinement and Optical Gaps in Si Nanocrystals.Phys. Rev. Lett., 79:1770–1773, Sep 1997. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.79.1770,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.79. 1770

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79 1997

  78. [97]

    Electro nic transport in two-dimensional graphene

    Giovanni Onida, Lucia Reining, and Angel Rubio. Elec- tronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches.Rev. Mod. Phys., 74:601– 659, Jun 2002. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/RevModPhys.74.601,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys. 74.601

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys 2002

  79. [98]

    Ab initio electronic and optical spectra of free- base porphyrins: The role of electronic correlation.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 131(8):084102, 08 2009

    Maurizia Palummo, Conor Hogan, Francesco Sottile, et al. Ab initio electronic and optical spectra of free- base porphyrins: The role of electronic correlation.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 131(8):084102, 08 2009. doi:10.1063/1.3204938

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3204938 2009

  80. [99]

    Panadés-Barrueta and Dorothea Golze

    RamÃşn L. Panadés-Barrueta and Dorothea Golze. Ac- celerating Core-Level GW Calculations by Combining the Contour Deformation Approach with the Analytic Continuation of W.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 19(16):5450–5464, 2023.doi:10.1021/ acs.jctc.3c00555. 15

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.