pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.13420 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-19 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph

Efficient and compact quantum network node based on a parabolic mirror on an optical chip

A. Safari , E. Oh , P. Huft , G. Chase , J. Zhang , M. Saffman This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-ph
keywords quantum networksneutral atomsphoton collectionatom-photon entanglementparabolic mirrorfiber-integrated opticsquantum repeatersrubidium atom
0
0 comments X

The pith

A parabolic mirror integrated on a chip forms a compact neutral-atom node that collects 9 percent of emitted photons while generating atom-photon entanglement with 0.93 raw fidelity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates a neutral atom quantum networking node that achieves both high photon collection efficiency and high-fidelity atom-photon entanglement inside a compact, fiber-integrated platform. A parabolic mirror simultaneously traps a single rubidium atom and collects its fluorescence, intrinsically matching the sigma-polarized photons to the fiber while making the system stable against small misalignments or drifts. The entire core optics consist of millimeter-scale pre-aligned components rigidly bonded on a monolithic in-vacuum assembly and accessed only through optical fibers. This yields an overall detected efficiency of 5 percent, from which the authors infer a 9 percent collection efficiency after single-mode fiber coupling, together with raw Bell-state fidelity of 0.93. The design is presented as a practical, cavity-free building block that can be replicated and extended to atomic arrays for scalable quantum networks and repeaters.

Core claim

We demonstrate a neutral atom networking node that combines high photon collection efficiency with high atom photon entanglement fidelity in a compact, fiber integrated platform. A parabolic mirror is used both to form the trap and to collect fluorescence from a single rubidium atom, intrinsically mode matching sigma polarized emitted photons to the fiber and rendering the system largely insensitive to small imperfections or drifts. With this design, we measure an overall photon collection and detection efficiency of 5 percent, from which we infer an overall collection efficiency of 9 percent after the single-mode fiber coupling, and generate atom photon entangled states with a raw Bellstate

What carries the argument

The parabolic mirror that forms the optical trap for the rubidium atom and collects its fluorescence, intrinsically mode-matching the sigma-polarized photons to the single-mode fiber while providing drift insensitivity.

If this is right

  • The same node design can be realized in independent setups with comparable performance.
  • The architecture is compatible with adding high-NA objective lenses to create and control atomic arrays at each node.
  • The interface operates near the limit set by the collection optics numerical aperture without requiring a cavity.
  • The fiber-integrated monolithic assembly provides a scalable building block for quantum network nodes and repeaters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The drift insensitivity could reduce the infrastructure needed for stable operation at multiple distant nodes.
  • Combining the mirror with array control lenses might allow multi-atom nodes while preserving the fiber interface.
  • The cavity-free approach may simplify integration with other photonic components for longer-distance quantum links.

Load-bearing premise

The parabolic mirror must intrinsically mode-match the emitted photons to the fiber and remain largely insensitive to small imperfections or drifts to reach the stated collection efficiency and entanglement fidelity.

What would settle it

Replicating the setup and measuring a collection efficiency well below 9 percent after fiber coupling, or a raw Bell-state fidelity well below 0.93, would falsify the performance claims for this compact node design.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.13420 by A. Safari, E. Oh, G. Chase, J. Zhang, M. Saffman, P. Huft.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Optical setup and experimental sequence. (a) Setup used for single-atom and single-photon characterization as well as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) After detection of a photon, a microwave [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) and (c) parity oscillations in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We demonstrate a neutral atom networking node that combines high photon collection efficiency with high atom photon entanglement fidelity in a compact, fiber integrated platform. A parabolic mirror is used both to form the trap and to collect fluorescence from a single rubidium atom, intrinsically mode matching $\sigma$ polarized emitted photons to the fiber and rendering the system largely insensitive to small imperfections or drifts. The core optics consist of millimeter scale components that are pre aligned, rigidly bonded on a monolithic in-vacuum assembly, and interfaced entirely via optical fibers. With this design, we measure an overall photon collection and detection efficiency of $5\%$, from which we infer an overall collection efficiency of $9\%$ after the single--mode fiber coupling. We generate atom photon entangled states with a raw Bell state fidelity of 0.93 and an inferred fidelity of 0.98 after correcting for atom readout errors. The same node design has been realized in two independent setups with comparable performance and is compatible with adding high NA objective lenses to create and control atomic arrays at each node. Our results establish a robust, cavity free neutral atom interface that operates near the limit set by the collection optics numerical aperture and provides a practical building block for scalable quantum network nodes and repeaters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript demonstrates a compact, fiber-integrated neutral atom quantum network node using a parabolic mirror for both trapping a single rubidium atom and collecting its fluorescence photons. The design achieves an overall photon detection efficiency of 5%, from which a collection efficiency of 9% is inferred after single-mode fiber coupling, and generates atom-photon entangled states with a raw Bell fidelity of 0.93 (inferred 0.98 after readout error correction). The core optics are millimeter-scale, pre-aligned, and rigidly bonded on a monolithic in-vacuum assembly interfaced entirely via fibers. The same node design is realized in two independent setups with comparable performance and is compatible with high-NA objective lenses for atomic arrays. The approach is cavity-free and claims robustness to small imperfections due to intrinsic mode-matching of σ-polarized photons.

Significance. If the reported performance holds, this work provides a practical, scalable building block for neutral-atom quantum networks and repeaters. The combination of high collection efficiency (near the NA limit), high entanglement fidelity, compactness, and fiber integration without cavities addresses key engineering challenges in quantum networking. Direct experimental measurements of detection efficiency and Bell fidelity, reproduced across two setups with standard loss accounting and readout correction, strengthen the claims. The monolithic pre-aligned assembly and insensitivity to drifts offer advantages for real-world deployment. This could accelerate development of quantum internet components.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The inference from 5% detection efficiency to 9% collection efficiency would benefit from a brief explicit statement of the loss factors (e.g., fiber coupling, detector quantum efficiency) used in the accounting, even if standard.
  2. [Results] The manuscript would be strengthened by a short table or side-by-side comparison of the key metrics (efficiency, fidelity, stability) from the two independent setups to highlight reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation to accept. We are pleased that the work is recognized as providing a practical building block for neutral-atom quantum networks.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in experimental results

full rationale

The manuscript reports direct experimental measurements of photon collection efficiency (5% detected, 9% inferred) and atom-photon entanglement fidelity (raw 0.93, corrected 0.98) in a fiber-integrated parabolic-mirror node. These quantities are obtained from calibrated detection counts and Bell-state tomography on single atoms, with readout-error correction performed via independent calibration measurements. No theoretical derivation chain, parameter fitting that is then relabeled as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation is invoked to obtain the central performance numbers; the results stand on empirical data from two independent realizations. The design description of the mirror's mode-matching property is presented as a physical consequence of the parabolic geometry rather than a fitted or self-defined quantity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The demonstration rests on standard quantum-optics assumptions for atom-photon coupling and fluorescence collection; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond conventional efficiency calibrations.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard quantum mechanics governs atom-photon entanglement and fluorescence emission patterns
    Invoked to interpret the measured Bell-state fidelity and collection geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5536 in / 1231 out tokens · 41623 ms · 2026-05-16T12:38:01.719373+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A quantum frequency conversion hub interfacing with DWDM networks

    quant-ph 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    A QFC hub achieves 2 THz pump tunability via a dispersion sweet spot in PPLN and distributes polarization-encoded single photons across 16 ITU-T DWDM channels while preserving quantum information.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Reiserer and G

    A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum net- works with single atoms and optical photons, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1379 (2015). 7

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum inter- net: a vision for the road ahead, Science362, eaam9288 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Drmota, D

    P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger, D. Main, B. C. Nichol, E. M. Ainley, D. Leichtle, A. Mantri, E. Kashefi, R. Srinivas, G. Araneda, C. J. Ballance, and D. M. Lucas, Verifiable blind quantum computing with trapped ions and single photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 150604 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Polacchi, D

    B. Polacchi, D. Leichtle, L. Limongi, G. Carvacho, G. Milani, N. Spagnolo, M. Kaplan, F. Sciarrino, and E. Kashefi, Multi-client distributed blind quantum com- putation with the qline architecture, Nat. Commun.14, 10.1038/s41467-023-43617-0 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43617-0 2023

  6. [6]

    Afzal, M

    F. Afzal, M. Akhlaghi, S. J. Beale, O. Bedroya, K. Bell, L. Bergeron, K. Bonsma-Fisher, P. Bychkova, Z. M. E. Chaisson, C. Chartrand, C. Clear, A. Dar- cie, A. DeAbreu, C. DeLisle, L. A. Duncan, C. D. Smith, J. Dunn, A. Ebrahimi, N. Evetts, D. F. Pin- heiro, P. Fuentes, T. Georgiou, B. Guha, R. Haenel, D. Higginbottom, D. M. Jackson, N. Jahed, A. Khorshi-...

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    D. Main, P. Drmota, D. P. Nadlinger, E. M. Ainley, A. Agrawal, B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, G. Araneda, and D. M. Lucas, Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link, Nature638, 383 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Kómár, E

    P. Kómár, E. M. Kessler, M. Bishof, L. Jiang, A. S. Sørensen, J. Ye, and M. D. Lukin, A quantum network of clocks, Nat. Phys.10, 582 (2014)

    work page 2014

  9. [9]

    Kómár, T

    P. Kómár, T. Topcu, E. M. Kessler, A. Derevianko, V. Vuletić, J. Ye, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum network of atom clocks: A possible implementation with neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 060506 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Beloy, M

    K. Beloy, M. I. Bodine, T. Bothwell, S. M. Brewer, S. L. Bromley, J.-S. Chen, J.-D. Deschênes, S. A. Diddams, R. J. Fasano, T. M. Fortier, Y. S. Hassan, D. B. Hume, D. Kedar, C. J. Kennedy, I. Khader, A. Koepke, D. R. Leibrandt, H. Leopardi, A. D. Ludlow, W. F. McGrew, W. R. Milner, N. R. Newbury, D. Nicolodi, E. Oelker, T. E. Parker, J. M. Robinson, S. R...

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    B.K.Malia, Y.Wu, J.Martínez-Rincón,andM.A.Kase- vich, Distributed quantum sensing with mode-entangled spin-squeezed atomic states, Nature612, 661 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    B. C. Nichol, R. Srinivas, D. P. Nadlinger, P. Drmota, D. Main, G. Araneda, C. J. Ballance, and D. M. Lu- cas, An elementary quantum network of entangled opti- cal atomic clocks, Nature609, 689 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    Gottesman, T

    D. Gottesman, T. Jennewein, and S. Croke, Longer base- line telescopes using quantum repeaters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 070503 (2012)

    work page 2012

  14. [14]

    M. M. Marchese and P. Kok, Large baseline optical imag- ing assisted by single photons and linear quantum optics, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 160801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Liu, Y.-Z

    W.-Z. Liu, Y.-Z. Zhang, Y.-Z. Zhen, M.-H. Li, Y. Liu, J. Fan, F. Xu, Q. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, Toward a pho- tonic demonstration of device-independent quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 050502 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    D. P. Nadlinger, P. Drmota, B. C. Nichol, G. Araneda, D. Main, R. Srinivas, D. M. Lucas, C. J. Ballance, K. Ivanov, E. Y.-Z. Tan, P. Sekatski, R. L. Urbanke, R. Renner, N. Sangouard, and J.-D. Bancal, Experimen- tal quantum key distribution certified by Bell’s theorem, Nature607, 682 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Zhang, T

    W. Zhang, T. van Leent, K. Redeker, R. Garthoff, R. Schwonnek, F. Fertig, S. Eppelt, W. Rosenfeld, V. Scarani, C. C.-W. Lim, and H. Weinfurter, A device- independent quantum key distribution system for distant users, Nature607, 687 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Zapatero, T

    V. Zapatero, T. van Leent, R. Arnon-Friedman, W.-Z. Liu, Q. Zhang, H. Weinfurter, and M. Curty, Advances in device-independent quantum key distribution, npj Qu. Inf.9, 10 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Simon and W

    C. Simon and W. T. M. Irvine, Robust long-distance en- tanglement and a loophole-free bell test with ions and photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 110405 (2003)

    work page 2003

  20. [20]

    Duan and H

    L.-M. Duan and H. J. Kimble, Efficient engineering of multiatom entanglement through single-photon detec- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 253601 (2003)

    work page 2003

  21. [21]

    D. E. Browne, M. B. Plenio, and S. F. Huelga, Robust creation of entanglement between ions in spatially sepa- rate cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 067901 (2003)

    work page 2003

  22. [22]

    Feng, Z.-M

    X.-L. Feng, Z.-M. Zhang, X.-D. Li, S.-Q. Gong, and Z.-Z. Xu, Entangling distant atoms by interference of polarized photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 217902 (2003)

    work page 2003

  23. [23]

    L. J. Stephenson, D. P. Nadlinger, B. C. Nichol, S. An, P. Drmota, T. G. Ballance, K. Thirumalai, J. F. Good- win, D. M. Lucas, and C. J. Ballance, High-rate, high- fidelity entanglement of qubits across an elementary quantum network, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 110501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Krutyanskiy, M

    V. Krutyanskiy, M. Galli, V. Krcmarsky, S. Baier, D. A. Fioretto, Y. Pu, A. Mazloom, P. Sekatski, M. Canteri, M. Teller, J. Schupp, J. Bate, M. Meraner, N. San- gouard, B. P. Lanyon, and T. E. Northup, Entanglement of trapped-ion qubits separated by 230 meters, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 050803 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    O’Reilly, G

    J. O’Reilly, G. Toh, I. Goetting, S. Saha, M. Sha- laev, A. L. Carter, A. Risinger, A. Kalakuntla, T. Li, A. Verma, and C. Monroe, Fast photon-mediated entan- glement of continuously cooled trapped ions for quantum networking, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 090802 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    M.Pompili, S.L.N.Hermans, S.Baier, H.K.C.Beukers, P. C. Humphreys, R. N. Schouten, R. F. L. Vermeulen, M. J. Tiggelman, L. dos Santos Martins, B. Dirkse, S. Wehner, and R. Hanson, Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid-state qubits, Science 372, 259 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Stockill, M

    R. Stockill, M. J. Stanley, L. Huthmacher, E. Clarke, M. Hugues, A. J. Miller, C. Matthiesen, C. Le Gall, and M. Atatüre, Phase-tuned entangled state generation be- tween distant spin qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 010503 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Welte, P

    S. Welte, P. Thomas, L. Hartung, S. Daiss, S. Langen- feld, O. Morin, G. Rempe, and E. Distante, A nonde- structive Bell-state measurement on two distant atomic 8 qubits, Nat. Photon.15, 504 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    van Leent, M

    T. van Leent, M. Bock, F. Fertig, R. Garthoff, S. Eppelt, Y. Zhou, P. Malik, M. Seubert, T. Bauer, W. Rosen- feld, W. Zhang, C. Becher, and H. Weinfurter, Entan- gling single atoms over 33 km telecom fibre, Nature607, 69 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    M. A. Norcia, H. Kim, W. B. Cairncross, M. Stone, A. Ryou, M. Jaffe, M. O. Brown, K. Barnes, P.Battaglino, T.C.Bohdanowicz, A.Brown, K.Cassella, C. A. Chen, R. Coxe, D. Crow, J. Epstein, C. Griger, E. Halperin, F. Hummel, A. M. W. Jones, J. M. Kin- dem, J. King, K. Kotru, J. Lauigan, M. Li, M. Lu, E. Megidish, J. Marjanovic, M. McDonald, T. Mittiga, J. A....

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Gyger, M

    F. Gyger, M. Ammenwerth, R. Tao, H. Timme, S. Sni- girev, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Continuous operation of large-scaleatomarraysinopticallattices,Phys.Rev.Res. 6, 033104 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    H. J. Manetsch, G. Nomura, E. Bataille, K. H. Leung, X. Lv, and M. Endres, A tweezer array with 6100 highly coherent atomic qubits, Nature647, 60 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    C. B. Young, A. Safari, P. Huft, J. Zhang, E. Oh, R. Chinnarasu, and M. Saffman, An architecture for quantum networking of neutral atom processors, Appl.Phys. B128, 151 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    B. Hu, J. Sinclair, E. Bytyqi, M. Chong, A. Rudelis, J. Ramette, Z. Vendeiro, and V. Vuletíc, Site-selective cavity readout and classical error correction of a 5-bit atomic register, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 120801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Seubert, L

    M. Seubert, L. Hartung, S. Welte, G. Rempe, and E. Distante, Tweezer-assisted subwavelength positioning of atomic arrays in an optical cavity, PRX Quantum6, 010322 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    L. Li, X. Hu, Z. Jia, W. Huie, W. K. C. Sun, Aakash, Y. Dong, N. Hiri-O-Tuppa, and J. P. Covey, Paral- lelized telecom quantum networking with an ytterbium- 171 atom array, Nat. Phys. (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    J. P. Covey, H. Weinfurter, and H. Bernien, Quantum networks with neutral atom processing nodes, npj Qu. Inf.9, 90 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    P. L. Ocola, I. Dimitrova, B. Grinkemeyer, E. Guardado- Sanchez, T. Ðorđević, P. Samutpraphoot, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Control and entanglement of individual Ry- dberg atoms near a nanoscale device, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 113601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Garcia, D

    S. Garcia, D. Maxein, L. Hohmann, J. Reichel, and R. Long, Fiber-pigtailed optical tweezer for single-atom trapping and single-photon generation, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 114103 (2013)

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    J. Volz, M. Weber, D. Schlenk, W. Rosenfeld, J. Vrana, K. Saucke, C. Kurtsiefer, and H. Weinfurter, Observation of entanglement of a single photon with a trapped atom, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 030404 (2006)

    work page 2006

  41. [41]

    T. Wilk, S. C. Webster, A. Kuhn, and G. Rempe, Single- atom single-photon quantum interface, Science317, 488 (2007)

    work page 2007

  42. [42]

    van Leent, M

    T. van Leent, M. Bock, R. Garthoff, K. Redeker, W. Zhang, T. Bauer, W. Rosenfeld, C. Becher, and H. Weinfurter, Long-distance distribution of atom- photon entanglement at telecom wavelength, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 010510 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    Hartung, M

    L. Hartung, M. Seubert, S. Welte, E. Distante, and G. Rempe, A quantum-network register assembled with optical tweezers in an optical cavity, Science385, 179 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Y.-S. Chin, M. Steiner, and C. Kurtsiefer, Polarization gradient cooling of single atoms in optical dipole traps, Phys. Rev. A96, 033406 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    E. R. Abraham and E. A. Cornell, Teflon feedthrough for coupling optical fibers into ultrahigh vacuum systems, Appl. Opt.37, 1762 (1998)

    work page 1998

  46. [46]

    Bourdeauducq, R

    S. Bourdeauducq, R. Jördens, and D. Nadlinger, Artiq: A real-time experiment control system (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    R. H. Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Correlation between pho- tons in two coherent beams of light, Nature177, 27 (1956)

    work page 1956

  48. [48]

    D. M. Harber, H. J. Lewandowski, J. M. McGuirk, and E. A. Cornell, Effect of cold collisions on spin coherence and resonance shifts in a magnetically trapped ultracold gas, Phys. Rev. A66, 053616 (2002)

    work page 2002

  49. [49]

    Treutlein, P

    P. Treutlein, P. Hommelhoff, T. Steinmetz, T. W. Hän- sch, and J. Reichel, Coherence in microchip traps, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 203005 (2004)

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    B. B. Blinov, D. L. Moehring, L.-M. Duan, and C. Mon- roe, Observation of entanglement between a single trapped atom and a single photon, Nature428, 153 (2004)

    work page 2004

  51. [51]

    Maiwald, A

    R. Maiwald, A. Golla, M. Fischer, M. Bader, S. Heugel, B. Chalopin, M. Sondermann, and G. Leuchs, Collecting more than half the fluorescence photons from a single ion, Phys. Rev. A86, 043431 (2012)

    work page 2012

  52. [52]

    Huft, Building blocks of an integrated neutral atom quantum network, PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin- Madison (2025)

    P. Huft, Building blocks of an integrated neutral atom quantum network, PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin- Madison (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    pancake chamber

    J. D. Thompson, T. G. Tiecke, A. S. Zibrov, V. Vuletić, andM.D.Lukin,CoherenceandRamansidebandcooling of a single atom in an optical tweezer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 133001 (2013). 9 VIII. METHODS A. On-chip architecture We present a compact and plug-and-play node design in which most of the optics are pre-aligned in vacuum on a chip with fiber interfaces. ...

    work page 2013