pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.15090 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-21 · 🧮 math.OC

From carbon management strategies to implementation: Modeling and physical simulation of CO2 pipeline infrastructure -- a case study for Germany

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 12:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC
keywords CO2 pipeline infrastructurecarbon capture and storagenetwork modelingphysical simulationGermany energy transitiondense phase transportinfrastructure planning
0
0 comments X

The pith

Germany can build a 7000 km CO2 pipeline network for 17 billion euros to connect industrial sites by 2045.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an integrated approach that combines energy system scenarios with physical pipeline simulations to design a CO2 transport network for Germany. It shows that following existing gas corridors with specific diameters allows stable transport of captured carbon from sources like cement plants to storage or utilization hubs. This matters because it gives policymakers a concrete, costed plan to implement carbon management strategies under uncertainty about future emissions.

Core claim

Using spatially resolved CO2 balances from energy scenarios for 2045, the authors design a pipeline topology that follows existing gas corridors and apply the MYNTS simulator to confirm technical feasibility for dense-phase transport accounting for elevation and impurities, resulting in a 7000 km system with DN700 main lines and DN500/DN400 branches costing approximately 17 billion euros.

What carries the argument

The integrated method that derives CO2 source and sink locations from scenarios and optimizes the pipeline network topology using physical simulation with MYNTS to determine diameters, pump locations, and operating conditions.

If this is right

  • Most cement, lime production, waste incineration sites, carbon users, coastal hubs, and border points can be connected by the network.
  • Investment costs total about 17 billion euros for the optimized system.
  • The design ensures stable dense-phase CO2 transport under various conditions.
  • The method is reproducible and can be applied to other countries or European scale.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This suggests that retrofitting existing gas infrastructure corridors could reduce planning and construction barriers for CO2 networks.
  • Future work could test the model against real pilot projects or varying energy scenarios to refine cost estimates.
  • Such planning tools might help prioritize which industrial clusters to decarbonize first based on connection costs.

Load-bearing premise

The CO2 production and demand locations from the energy system scenarios will match reality in 2045, and the MYNTS simulator accurately models all physical effects like elevation changes and impurities in the CO2 stream.

What would settle it

Observing that the actual required pipeline length or investment exceeds 7000 km and 17 billion euros substantially, or that physical tests show the proposed diameters and pumps cannot maintain dense-phase flow under real elevation and impurity conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.15090 by Bernhard Klaassen, Luna L\"utz, Marius Neuwirth, Mehrnaz Anvari, Okan Akca, Simon Lukas Bussmann, Tobias Fleiter.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Development of cement clinker production in the scenario [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: CO2 balance and temporal development of both scenarios 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: CO2 Topology 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Network topology showing (a) pipeline diameters and (b) pump place [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Fluid dynamic simulation results of (a) pressure and (b) temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase diagram of CO2 showing the pressure–temperature distribution of all network nodes. The pink line marks the boundary between the gaseous and dense phases. Each data point represents a node in the network [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Effect of elevation differences on CO2 pressure, showing (a) network node elevations and (b) pressure distribution along the highlighted section in￾fluenced by the hydrostatic pressure effect. The arrow in (b) marks the pipeline segment between the higher-elevation upstream region and the lower-elevation downstream region, where this pressure behavior occurs. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of pressure and temperature distribution along the se [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Pressure results of CO2 network simulations with different impurity levels. The three cases correspond to 100% CO2 (left), 98% CO2, 1% H2, 1% O2 (middle), and 96% CO2, 2% H2, 2% O2 (right). 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Carbon capture and storage or utilization (CCUS) will play an important role to achieve climate neutrality in many economies. Pipelines are widely regarded as the most efficient means of CO2 transport; however, they are currently non-existent. Policy-makers and companies need to develop large-scale infrastructure under substantial uncertainty. Methods and analyses are needed to support pipeline planning and strategy development. This paper presents an integrated method for designing CO2 pipeline networks by combining energy system scenarios with physical network simulation. Using Germany as a case study in a projection to the year 2045, we derive spatially highly resolved CO2 balances to develop a dense-phase CO2 pipeline topology that follows existing gas pipeline corridors. The analyzed system includes existing sites for cement and lime production, waste incineration, carbon users, four coastal CO2 hubs, and border crossing points. We then apply the multiphysical network simulator MYNTS to assess the technical feasibility of this network. We determine pipeline diameters, pump locations, and operating conditions that ensure stable dense-phase transport. The method explicitly accounts for elevation and possible impurities.The results indicate that a system of about 7000 km pipeline length and a mixed normed diameter of DN700 on main corridors and of DN500/DN400 on branches presents a feasible solution to connect most sites. Investment costs for the optimized pipeline system are calculated to be about 17 billion Euros. The method provides a reproducible framework and is transferable to other countries and to European scope.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents an integrated workflow that derives spatially resolved CO2 supply/demand balances from energy-system scenarios for Germany in 2045, routes a pipeline network along existing gas corridors, and uses the MYNTS multiphysics simulator to size diameters (DN700 on main corridors, DN500/DN400 on branches), locate pumps, and verify stable dense-phase operation while accounting for elevation and impurities. The resulting network is reported as approximately 7000 km long with investment costs of about 17 billion Euros and is claimed to be technically feasible for connecting cement, lime, waste-incineration, and CO2-utilization sites plus coastal hubs.

Significance. If the MYNTS results hold under real conditions, the work supplies a reproducible, transferable framework for CCUS infrastructure planning that explicitly couples scenario-derived balances with physical network simulation. The handling of elevation-induced hydrostatic effects and impurity impacts on the phase envelope is a concrete technical strength. The headline numbers (7000 km, mixed diameters, 17 B€) would then constitute a concrete, falsifiable planning benchmark for Germany and similar countries.

major comments (3)
  1. [MYNTS simulation results] MYNTS simulation results (methods and results sections): no external validation or benchmark against measured data from operating CO2 pipelines (Sleipner, Weyburn, or pilot segments) or independent codes is reported. Because pressure-drop, phase-envelope shift, and pump-power predictions directly determine the chosen diameters and the feasibility claim, absence of such checks leaves the central technical conclusion only moderately supported.
  2. [scenario integration section] CO2 balance derivation (scenario integration section): the spatially resolved production and demand figures are taken from external energy scenarios without reported sensitivity tests, error propagation, or comparison to current measured emissions. Any systematic bias in these balances would propagate directly into network topology, total length, and cost estimates.
  3. [results section] Cost estimation (results section): the 17 billion Euro figure is stated without a transparent breakdown of unit costs, contingency factors, or sensitivity to diameter or routing assumptions. This makes it impossible to judge whether the cost claim is robust to plausible variations in construction parameters.
minor comments (2)
  1. [results] Notation for pipeline diameters (DN700, DN500, DN400) should be defined at first use and cross-referenced to the norm tables employed.
  2. [results] Figure showing the final network topology would benefit from explicit labeling of pump stations and elevation profiles to allow readers to verify the physical constraints.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects for strengthening the technical credibility of our modeling approach. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [MYNTS simulation results] MYNTS simulation results (methods and results sections): no external validation or benchmark against measured data from operating CO2 pipelines (Sleipner, Weyburn, or pilot segments) or independent codes is reported. Because pressure-drop, phase-envelope shift, and pump-power predictions directly determine the chosen diameters and the feasibility claim, absence of such checks leaves the central technical conclusion only moderately supported.

    Authors: We agree that external validation would strengthen the results. MYNTS has been validated internally by the developers for natural gas and CO2 transport applications, but we did not include specific benchmarks in the manuscript. In the revision, we will add a new subsection in the methods discussing validation against literature data for dense-phase CO2 pipelines, including pressure drop calculations compared to models from the literature (e.g., references to studies on Sleipner and Weyburn). We will also compare key outputs like pump power requirements to independent calculations using standard correlations for two-phase flow. This will provide better support for the feasibility claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [scenario integration section] CO2 balance derivation (scenario integration section): the spatially resolved production and demand figures are taken from external energy scenarios without reported sensitivity tests, error propagation, or comparison to current measured emissions. Any systematic bias in these balances would propagate directly into network topology, total length, and cost estimates.

    Authors: The CO2 supply and demand figures are derived from the 'Climate Neutral Germany 2045' scenario by the Fraunhofer Institute and others, which are widely used in German energy planning. To address the lack of sensitivity analysis, we will include in the revised manuscript a sensitivity study varying the CO2 volumes by ±20% and report the resulting changes in total pipeline length and costs. Additionally, we will add a comparison of the 2045 projections to current (2020) measured CO2 emissions from the included sectors to contextualize the growth. Error propagation will be discussed qualitatively, noting that the network design is robust to moderate variations. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [results section] Cost estimation (results section): the 17 billion Euro figure is stated without a transparent breakdown of unit costs, contingency factors, or sensitivity to diameter or routing assumptions. This makes it impossible to judge whether the cost claim is robust to plausible variations in construction parameters.

    Authors: We acknowledge the need for greater transparency in the cost estimation. In the revised version, we will expand the results section with a detailed breakdown of the cost calculation, including unit costs per kilometer for each diameter class (DN700, DN500, DN400) based on referenced sources (e.g., studies on European pipeline costs), assumptions on terrain factors, and a 20% contingency. We will also present a sensitivity analysis showing how costs vary with ±10% changes in unit costs and different routing scenarios. This will allow readers to assess the robustness of the 17 billion Euro estimate. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results follow from external scenarios fed into independent physical simulator

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from externally generated energy-system CO2 balances to a corridor-based topology, then applies the MYNTS multiphysics simulator to compute diameters, pump locations, and feasibility under elevation and impurities. No step reduces by definition or by author-fitted parameters to the headline outputs (7000 km, DN700/500/400, 17 B€). MYNTS is treated as an external computational engine whose internal equations are not redefined inside the paper; costs are post-processed from the resulting geometry. No self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is load-bearing for the central feasibility claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the accuracy of 2045 CO2 supply-demand maps taken from external energy scenarios and on the MYNTS simulator's ability to represent dense-phase flow under real elevation and impurity conditions; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • Pipeline diameters and pump locations
    Selected via simulation to maintain stable dense-phase flow; treated as design outputs rather than inputs.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Energy system scenarios supply reliable spatially resolved CO2 balances for 2045
    These balances are the direct input for network topology design.
  • domain assumption Dense-phase transport remains technically preferable and stable under the modeled conditions
    Explicitly stated as the operating mode for the entire network.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5594 in / 1422 out tokens · 53986 ms · 2026-05-16T12:19:26.993022+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Peder Aursand, Morten Hammer, Svend Tollak Munkejord, and Øivind Wilhelmsen, Pipeline transport of CO2 mixtures: Models for transient simulation,International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 15:174–185, 2013

  2. [2]

    Anton Baldin, Kl¨ are Cassirer, Tanja Clees, Bernhard Klaassen, Igor Nikitin, Lialia Nikitina, and Sabine Pott. On advanced modeling of com- pressors and weighted mix iteration for simulation of gas transport net- works, InInternational Conference on Simulation and Modeling Method- ologies, Technologies and Applications, pages 138–152. Springer, 2021

  3. [3]

    Universal translation al- gorithm for formulation of transport network problems

    Anton Baldin, Kl¨ are Cassirer, Tanja Clees, Bernhard Klaassen, Igor N Nikitin, Lialia Nikitina, and Inna Torgovitskaia. Universal translation al- gorithm for formulation of transport network problems. InSIMULTECH, pages 315–322, 2018

  4. [4]

    Anton Baldin, Tanja Clees, Barbara Fuchs, Bernhard Klaassen, Igor Nikitin, Lialia Nikitina, and Inna Torgovitskaia. Topological reduction of gas transport networks, InR¨ uckemann, Doytsher et al.(Hg.): INFO- COMP 2019, The Ninth International Conference on Advanced Commu- nications and Computation, Nice, France, July 28-August 2, 2019, pages 15–20. ThinkM...

  5. [5]

    Topological reduction of stationary network problems: exam- ple of gas transport,International Journal On Advances in Systems and Measurements, 13:83–93, 2020

    Anton Baldin, Tanja Clees, Bernhard Klaassen, Igor Nikitin, and Lialia Nikitina. Topological reduction of stationary network problems: exam- ple of gas transport,International Journal On Advances in Systems and Measurements, 13:83–93, 2020

  6. [6]

    Viola Becattini, Luca Riboldi, Johannes Burger, Julian N¨ ohl, Pauline Oeu- vray, Adriana Reyes-L´ ua, Rahul Anantharaman, Andr´ e Bardow, Linda Frattini, Chao Fu, Marco Mazzotti, Simon Roussanaly, and Cristina Zotic˘ a. Rolling-out pioneering carbon dioxide capture and transport chains from inland European industrial facilities: A techno-economic, enviro...

  7. [7]

    Gas network benchmark models, InAp- plications of Differential-Algebraic Equations: Examples and Benchmarks, pages 171–197

    Peter Benner, Sara Grundel, Christian Himpe, Christoph Huck, Tom Streubel, and Caren Tischendorf. Gas network benchmark models, InAp- plications of Differential-Algebraic Equations: Examples and Benchmarks, pages 171–197. Springer, 2018

  8. [8]

    Daniel Benrath, Stefan Flamme, Sabrina Glanz, Fanziska M. Hoffart. En- abling a low-carbon economy via hydrogen and ccs

  9. [9]

    Bundesministerium f¨ ur Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz, Eckpunkte der Bun- desregierung f¨ ur eine Carbon Management-strategie, 26.02.2024. 31

  10. [10]

    BV Kalk, Klimaneutraler Kalk unserer Roadmap 2045,https://www.ka lk.de/co2-roadmap2024

  11. [11]

    Maciej Chaczykowski and Andrzej J Osiadacz. Dynamic simulation of pipelines containing dense phase/supercritical CO2-rich mixtures for car- bon capture and storage.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 9:446–456, 2012

  12. [12]

    Efficient method for simulation of long- distance gas transport networks with large amounts of hydrogen injection

    Tanja Clees, Anton Baldin, Bernhard Klaassen, Lialia Nikitina, Igor Nikitin, and Philipp Spelten. Efficient method for simulation of long- distance gas transport networks with large amounts of hydrogen injection. Energy Conversion and Management, 234:113984, 2021

  13. [13]

    Mynts: Multi-physics network simulator

    Tanja Clees, Klare Cassirer, Nils Hornung, Bernhard Klaassen, Igor Nikitin, Lialia Nikitina, Robin Suter, and Inna Torgovitskaia. Mynts: Multi-physics network simulator. In2016 6th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications (SIMULTECH), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2016

  14. [14]

    Making network solvers globally convergent

    Tanja Clees, Igor Nikitin, and Lialia Nikitina. Making network solvers globally convergent. InInternational Conference on Simulation and Model- ing Methodologies, Technologies and Applications, pages 140–153. Springer, 2016

  15. [15]

    Tanja Clees, Igor Nikitin, Lialia Nikitina, and Lukasz Segiet. Modeling of gas compressors and hierarchical reduction for globally convergent station- ary network solvers.International Journal On Advances in Systems and Measurements, 11(2):61–71, 2018

  16. [16]

    Romano, Fabrizio Bezzo, and Lee J.M

    Federico d’Amore, Matteo C. Romano, Fabrizio Bezzo, and Lee J.M. Opti- mising carbon capture and storage supply chains for the European industry. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(3), 2021,https://www.scopus.com/inward/re cord.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85117961554&doi=10.1016%2fj.ifacol.2021.0 8.309&partnerID=40&md5=c914fc9abd81735bbb53145b81762015

  17. [17]

    Deutscher Bundestag, Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 20/11585 – Eck- punkte der Bundesregierung f¨ ur eine Carbon Management-Strategie,

  18. [18]

    Mod- ellierung von gasnetzwerken: Eine ¨ ubersicht

    Pia Domschke, Benjamin Hiller, Jens Lang, and Caren Tischendorf. Mod- ellierung von gasnetzwerken: Eine ¨ ubersicht. 2017

  19. [19]

    Federal Goverment Germany. KSpG- ¨Anderungsgesetz: KSpTG, 2025,ht tps://www.bundeswirtschaftsministerium.de/Redaktion/DE/Downl oads/Gesetz/2025/20250806-gesetzentwurf-kohlendioxid-speiche rungsgesetz-aenderungsgesetz-kabinettsvorlage.pdf?__blob=pub licationFile&v=10,

  20. [20]

    Tobias Fleiter, Matthias Rehfeldt, Pia Manz, Simon Bussmann, Marius Neuwirth, Andrea Herbst, and Meta Thurid Lotz. Langfristszenarien f¨ ur 32 die Transformation des Energiesystems in Deutschland 3 - O45-Szenarien - Modul Industriesektor.https://langfristszenarien.de/enertile-e xplorer-wAssets/docs/LFS3_O45_Industriebericht_v11.pdf

  21. [21]

    FNB Gas, Vereinigung der Fernleitungsnetzbetreiber Gas e.V., Netzen- twicklungsplan Gas 2022–2032, Technical report,https://fnb-gas.de/ netzentwicklungspl%C3%A4ne/netzentwicklungsplan-2022/

  22. [22]

    Model order reduction of differential alge- braic equations arising from the simulation of gas transport networks

    Sara Grundel, Lennart Jansen, Nils Hornung, Tanja Clees, Caren Tis- chendorf, and Peter Benner. Model order reduction of differential alge- braic equations arising from the simulation of gas transport networks. In Progress in Differential-Algebraic Equations: Deskriptor 2013, pages 183–

  23. [23]

    Hafenzeitung, Umschlagplatz f¨ ur CO2 in Bremen geplant, 2022,https: //hafenzeitung.de/umschlagplatz-fuer-co2-in-bremen-geplant

  24. [24]

    P Hofer, Error evaluation in calculation of pipelines.GWF-Gas/Erdgas, 114(3):113–119, 1973

  25. [25]

    H2 and CO2 network strategies for the European energy system,Nat Energy, pages 1–10, 2025,https://www.nature.com/artic les/s41560-025-01752-6

    Fabian Hofmann, Christoph Tries, Fabian Neumann, Elisabeth Zeyen, and Tom Brown. H2 and CO2 network strategies for the European energy system,Nat Energy, pages 1–10, 2025,https://www.nature.com/artic les/s41560-025-01752-6

  26. [26]

    Updated European CO 2 Storage Projects Map, 2025,https://iogpeurope.org/news/updated-e uropean-co%e2%82%82-storage-projects-map/

    International Association of Oil & Gas Producers. Updated European CO 2 Storage Projects Map, 2025,https://iogpeurope.org/news/updated-e uropean-co%e2%82%82-storage-projects-map/

  27. [27]

    ISO 12213-2 2006, Natural gas — Calculation of compression factor — Part 2: Calculation using molar-composition analysis, 2006, Reconfirmed 2016

  28. [28]

    Benjamin Klare, Brunsb¨ uttel als Hub f¨ ur CO2-Export, 2024,https://ww w.thb.info/rubriken/haefen/detail/news/hafenstandort-brunsbu ettel-als-hub-fuer-co2-export.html,

  29. [29]

    The gerg-2008 wide-range equation of state for natural gases and other mixtures: An expansion of gerg-2004

    Oliver Kunz and Wolfgang Wagner. The gerg-2008 wide-range equation of state for natural gases and other mixtures: An expansion of gerg-2004. Journal of chemical & engineering data, 57(11):3032–3091, 2012

  30. [30]

    Dynamic simulation of a carbon dioxide transfer pipeline for analysis of normal operation and failure modes.Energy Procedia, 4:3040–3047, 2011

    Stefan Liljemark, Kenneth Arvidsson, Michael TP Mc Cann, Hubertus Tummescheit, and Stephane Velut. Dynamic simulation of a carbon dioxide transfer pipeline for analysis of normal operation and failure modes.Energy Procedia, 4:3040–3047, 2011

  31. [31]

    Minist´ ere de la transit in ´ ecologique et solidaire, Strat´ egie nationale bas- carbone: La transition ´ ecologique et solidaire vers la neutralit´ e carbone, 2020,https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/documen ts/2020-03-25_MTES_SNBC2.pdf 33

  32. [32]

    Routekaart koolstofverwijdering, 2025

    Ministerie van Economische Zaken. Routekaart koolstofverwijdering, 2025

  33. [33]

    An- forderungen an eine CO2-Infrastruktur in Deutschland – Voraussetzungen f¨ ur Klimaneutralit¨ at in den Sektoren Zement, Kalk und Abfallverbrennung

    Manuel Mohr, Johannes Rupper, Birgit B¨ aumer, Dennis Behrouzi, Hannah Bruhns, Kristina Fleiger, Volker Hoenig, Robin Tewes, and Tim Thiele. An- forderungen an eine CO2-Infrastruktur in Deutschland – Voraussetzungen f¨ ur Klimaneutralit¨ at in den Sektoren Zement, Kalk und Abfallverbrennung. https://www.vdz-online.de/fileadmin/wissensportal/publikation en...

  34. [34]

    Optimised deployment of a European CO2 transport network.17505836, 7:48–61, 2012,https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583611002210

    Joris Morbee, Joana Serpa, and Evangelos Tzimas. Optimised deployment of a European CO2 transport network.17505836, 7:48–61, 2012,https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583611002210

  35. [35]

    Modelling the market diffusion of hydrogen-based steel and basic chemical production in Europe – a site-specific approach.Energy Conversion and Management, 322:119117, 2024

    Marius Neuwirth, Tobias Fleiter, and Ren´ e Hofmann. Modelling the market diffusion of hydrogen-based steel and basic chemical production in Europe – a site-specific approach.Energy Conversion and Management, 322:119117, 2024

  36. [36]

    The future potential hydrogen demand in energy-intensive industries - a site- specific approach applied to Germany.Energy Conversion and Manage- ment, 252:115052, 2022

    Marius Neuwirth, Tobias Fleiter, Pia Manz, and Ren´ e Hofmann. The future potential hydrogen demand in energy-intensive industries - a site- specific approach applied to Germany.Energy Conversion and Manage- ment, 252:115052, 2022

  37. [37]

    Tuan B. H. Nguyen, Husain Y. M. Bahzad, and Grazia Leonzio. Economic and environmental optimization of a ccus supply chain in Germany.Pro- cesses, 12(8), 2024,https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid =2-s2.0-85063972944&doi=10.1016%2fj.compchemeng.2019.04.001&p artnerID=40&md5=a00b5d65dabce584e4c0c6feeb648a04,

  38. [38]

    Laws of flow in rough pipes

    Johann Nikuradse et al. Laws of flow in rough pipes. 1950

  39. [39]

    Modelling of the CO2 process-and transport chain in ccs systems—examination of transport and storage processes.Geochem- istry, 70:185–192, 2010

    Michael Nimtz, Matthias Klatt, Bernd Wiese, Michael K¨ uhn, and Hans Joachim Krautz. Modelling of the CO2 process-and transport chain in ccs systems—examination of transport and storage processes.Geochem- istry, 70:185–192, 2010

  40. [40]

    Multi-criteria assessment of inland and offshore carbon dioxide transport options.09596526, 443:140781, 2024.https://www.sc iencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624002282

    Pauline Oeuvray, Johannes Burger, Simon Roussanaly, Marco Mazzotti, and Viola Becattini. Multi-criteria assessment of inland and offshore carbon dioxide transport options.09596526, 443:140781, 2024.https://www.sc iencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652624002282

  41. [41]

    Okoshi, Y

    T. Okoshi, Y. Uehara, and T. Takeuchi. The segmentation method - an approach to the analysis of microwave planar circuits (short papers).IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 24(10):662–668, 1976

  42. [42]

    Atermelestechnologiai parameterek valtozasa a gazlelepk muvelese soran.OGIL MUSZ, Tud, Kuzl., Budapest, pages 267–273, 1968

    J Papay. Atermelestechnologiai parameterek valtozasa a gazlelepk muvelese soran.OGIL MUSZ, Tud, Kuzl., Budapest, pages 267–273, 1968. 34

  43. [43]

    Ccs technology-CO2 transportation and relief simulation in the critical region for hse assessment.Chemical Engineering Transac- tions, 91:43–48, 2022

    Luigi Raimondi. Ccs technology-CO2 transportation and relief simulation in the critical region for hse assessment.Chemical Engineering Transac- tions, 91:43–48, 2022

  44. [44]

    Machbarkeitsstudie ¨ uber ein CO2-Sammel- und Transportnetz in ¨Osterreich.https://www.bmk.gv.a t/themen/klima_umwelt/klimaschutz/nat_klimapolitik/co2/studi e.html

    Sch¨ utzenhofer Christian, Leibetseder Daniela, Riedl Johannes, Lackner Anna, Zauner Christoph, Hochmeister Susanne, Kienberger Thomas, Awetisjan Vartan, and Wernhart Helmut. Machbarkeitsstudie ¨ uber ein CO2-Sammel- und Transportnetz in ¨Osterreich.https://www.bmk.gv.a t/themen/klima_umwelt/klimaschutz/nat_klimapolitik/co2/studi e.html

  45. [45]

    Mach- barkeitsstudie ¨ uber ein CO2-Sammel- und Transportnetz in ¨Osterreich

    Christian Sch¨ utzenhofer, Daniela Leibetseder, Johannes Riedl, Anna Lack- ner, Christoph Zauner, Susanne Hochmeister, Thomas Kienberger, Var- tan Awetisjan, Helmut Wernhart, and Aria Rodgarkia-Dara. Mach- barkeitsstudie ¨ uber ein CO2-Sammel- und Transportnetz in ¨Osterreich. Technical report, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH; Monta- nuniversit¨...

  46. [46]

    Co2 transportation: safety regu- lations and energy requirement, InEmerging Carbon Capture Technologies, pages 279–319

    Ahmad K Sleiti and Wahib A Al-Ammari. Co2 transportation: safety regu- lations and energy requirement, InEmerging Carbon Capture Technologies, pages 279–319. Elsevier, 2022

  47. [47]

    Shaping the future CO2 transport network for Europe.doi:10.2760/582433

    Drazen Tumara, Andreas Uihlein, and Ignacio Hidalgo. Shaping the future CO2 transport network for Europe.doi:10.2760/582433

  48. [48]

    Executive sumery CO2 infrastructure

    VDZ. Executive sumery CO2 infrastructure

  49. [49]

    Verpoort, Lukas Gast, Anke Hofmann, and Falko Ueckerdt

    Philipp C. Verpoort, Lukas Gast, Anke Hofmann, and Falko Ueckerdt. Im- pact of global heterogeneity of renewable energy supply on heavy industrial production and green value chains.Nature Energy, 9(4):491–503, 2024

  50. [50]

    VNG Equinor, H2GE Rostock, 2022.https://www.vng.de/de/newsroom /2022-07-04-equinor-und-vng-erweitern-zusammenarbeit-im-ber eich-wasserstoff-ammoniak-und

  51. [51]

    Wintershall, 2022, Wintershall Dea und HES Wilhelmshaven Tank Ter- minal beabsichtigen gemeinsam einen CO2-HUB in Wilhelmshaven zu en- twickeln, 2022,https://wintershalldea.com/de/newsroom/wintersha ll-dea-und-hes-wilhelmshaven-tank-terminal-beabsichtigen-gem einsam-einen-co2-hub

  52. [52]

    Industrial CO2 transport in Germany: Comparison of pipeline routing scenarios.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Con- trol, 137:104225, 2024

    Christopher Yeates, Ali Abdelshafy, Cornelia Schmidt-Hattenberger, and Grit Walther. Industrial CO2 transport in Germany: Comparison of pipeline routing scenarios.International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Con- trol, 137:104225, 2024. 35