arxiv: 2601.15452 · v3 · submitted 2026-01-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The long quest for vacuum birefringence in magnetars: 1E 1547.0-5408 and the elusive smoking gun

Roberto Taverna , Roberto Turolla , Lorenzo Marra , Ruth M. E. Kelly , Alice Borghese , Gian Luca Israel , Sandro Mereghetti , Andrea Possenti

show 2 more authors

Silvia Zane Michela Rigoselli

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 11:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE

keywords magnetarsX-ray polarizationvacuum birefringenceIXPErotating vector modelQED effects1E 1547.0-5408

0 comments

The pith

Magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408 shows high X-ray polarization explained by geometry rather than vacuum birefringence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

IXPE observed the magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408 for 500 ks and measured a linear polarization degree of 47.7 percent in the 2-6 keV range with a constant polarization angle. The polarization degree shows a possible minimum between 3 and 4 keV at only 1 sigma significance, which matches the expected signature of partial mode conversion at the vacuum resonance. Phase-resolved data fit a rotating vector model indicating emission from a small hot spot with misaligned magnetic and spin axes. This geometry means the high polarization alone does not provide strong evidence for vacuum birefringence in the magnetosphere, although the model's success in matching the data suggests QED effects are present.

Core claim

The IXPE spectrum is reproduced by a single thermal blackbody component, and the source exhibits high linear polarization with a constant polarization angle. Phase-resolved analyses show that thermal radiation originates from a single small hot spot with non-uniform temperature. Fitting the phase-dependent polarization angle with the rotating vector model constrains the geometry such that both the dipole axis and line of sight are misaligned with the spin axis, meaning the high polarization cannot be regarded as compelling evidence for vacuum birefringence. The successful reproduction of the polarization angle modulation and the energy behavior of the polarization degree, including a 1-sigma

What carries the argument

The rotating vector model (RVM) fitted to phase-resolved polarization angle data, which constrains geometry and shows high polarization can arise from misalignment without requiring vacuum birefringence.

If this is right

X-ray emission originates from a single fairly small hot spot with non-uniform temperature distribution.
Both the dipole axis and the line of sight are misaligned with respect to the spin axis.
The high polarization of the source cannot be regarded as compelling evidence for vacuum birefringence.
The rotating vector model reproduction of polarization angle modulation and polarization degree energy behavior points to the presence of QED effects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Applying the same RVM analysis to polarization data from other magnetars could reveal whether misaligned geometries are common.
Higher-sensitivity polarimetry could separate the contribution of vacuum resonance mode conversion from atmospheric effects.
The constrained geometry implies that spin-axis misalignment may influence emission models for the broader magnetar population.

Load-bearing premise

The marginal minimum in polarization degree between 3 and 4 keV is produced by partial mode conversion at the vacuum resonance rather than by unmodeled atmospheric or instrumental effects.

What would settle it

A future observation that either detects the 3-4 keV polarization minimum at greater than 3 sigma significance or shows no such minimum at all would confirm or refute the partial mode conversion interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.15452 by Alice Borghese, Andrea Possenti, Gian Luca Israel, Lorenzo Marra, Michela Rigoselli, Roberto Taverna, Roberto Turolla, Ruth M. E. Kelly, Sandro Mereghetti, Silvia Zane.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: IXPE source (dots with error bars) and background (stars) spectra (top panel) of 1E 1547.0−5408 collected by DU1 (black), DU2 (red) and DU3 (green), and fitting residuals in units of the standard deviation (bottom panels) for the tbabs×bbodyrad model with NH frozen at 4.6 × 1022 cm−2 (left), tbabs×(bbodyrad+bbodyrad) model with NH frozen at 4.6 × 1022 cm−2 (center) and tbabs×(bbodyrad+powerlaw) model with … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: IXPE pulse-profile of 1E 1547.0−5408 in the 2–6, 2–3, 3–4, 4–5 and 5–6 keV energy bands; the solid lines are splines connecting the data. phase-averaged analysis discussed in §3.2, we fit the data using a single-component model (tbabs×bbodyrad), with the column density NH frozen to the value reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Phase variation of the blackbody temperature (cyan) and radius (red) for the best-fitting model reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Top: energy-dependent polarization degree (cyan) and polarization angle (red) obtained with xspec (see text for details). Error bars show the 1σ confidence intervals derived with the err procedure. When the PD measurement falls below MDP99, a downwards arrow marks the 3σ upper limit; the associated value of PA is unconstrained and is shown by a double-headed arrow. Bottom: same in the PD-PA plane for the … view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Phase-dependent polarization degree (top) and polarization angle (bottom), integrated over the 2–6 keV range, obtained using xspec (cyan, see text for details). Errors are at 1σ, as derived with the xspec err procedure. Values are reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: IXPE 2–3 keV (cyan) and 3–6 keV (orange) polarization angle simultaneously fitted by a rotating vector model (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Marginalized posterior distributions for the RVM plus (top) and minus (bottom) solutions. The best-fit values (χ±, ξ±), obtained through χ 2 minimization, as well as the mirrored solutions (2π − χ±, 2π − ξ±) are marked by solid and dotted blue lines, respectively. The 1, 2, and 3σ confidence contours are shown in yellow, green, and red, respectively. The maximum a posteriori estimates, along with their a… view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Energy-dependent polarization degree (red) at the surface of an atmospheric patch including partial mode conversion at the VR. Here, the inclination of the magnetic field to the surface normal is ∼ 10◦ and the field strength 2 × 1014 G. The observed polarization degree is also shown (cyan) to facilitate visual comparison . clined by ∼ 10◦ wrt the surface normal and a probability threshold of Pth = 0.9. Al… view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: Pulse profile (normalized to the maximum, top), phase-dependent PD (middle) and PA (bottom) as obtained from the ray-tracing code discussed in R. Taverna et al. (2015), using χ− and ξ− (red dash-dotted line in the bottom panel). The emitting region is a circular spot at the magnetic pole (see text for details). Solid and dashed lines show the results obtained with and without including vacuum birefringe… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Magnetars are now known to be among the most strongly polarized celestial sources in X-rays. Here we report on the $500\,\mathrm{ks}$ observation of the magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408 performed by the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) in March 2025. The IXPE spectrum is well reproduced by a single thermal component with blackbody temperature $kT_\mathrm{BB}\sim 0.67\,\mathrm{keV}$ and emission radius $R_\mathrm{BB}\sim 1.2\,\mathrm{km}$. The source exhibits a high linear polarization degree in the $2$--$6\,\mathrm{keV}$ band ($\mathrm{PD}=47.7\pm2.9\%$) with polarization angle $\mathrm{PA}=75^\circ.8 \pm 1.^\circ8$, measured West of celestial North. While $\mathrm{PA}$ does not appear to vary with energy, there is some evidence (at the $1\sigma$ confidence level) of a minimum in $\mathrm{PD}$ between $3$ and $4\,\mathrm{keV}$, compatible with what is expected by partial mode conversion at the vacuum resonance in a magnetized atmosphere. Phase-resolved spectral and polarimetric analyses reveal that X-ray thermal radiation likely originates from a single, fairly small hot spot with a non-uniform temperature distribution. Fitting the phase-dependent $\mathrm{PA}$ measured by IXPE with a rotating vector model (RVM) constrains the source geometry and indicates that both the dipole axis and line-of-sight are misaligned with respect to the spin axis. Under these conditions, the high polarization of the source cannot be regarded as compelling evidence for the presence of vacuum birefringence in the star magnetosphere. Nevertheless, the fact that the RVM successfully reproduces the modulation of the X-ray polarization angle and the behavior of $\mathrm{PD}$ with the energy hint once more to the presence of QED effects in magnetars.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

New IXPE data on 1E 1547.0-5408 is a clean addition but the 1-sigma PD dip does not support a real hint for vacuum resonance.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper delivers a new 500 ks IXPE dataset on magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408 with solid polarization measurements, yet the suggested hint for vacuum birefringence from a PD minimum rests on a feature too marginal to carry weight. The spectrum is fit with a single blackbody at kT of 0.67 keV from a 1.2 km radius. They report an average PD of 47.7 percent in the 2-6 keV band with PA at 75.8 degrees west of north. PA stays flat with energy while PD shows a dip between 3 and 4 keV at the 1-sigma level, which they tie to partial mode conversion at the vacuum resonance. Phase-resolved analysis points to emission from one small hot spot with temperature variation across it. The RVM applied to the PA swing constrains the geometry to misaligned dipole and line of sight relative to the spin axis, leading them to conclude that the high PD is not strong evidence for birefringence but that the overall behavior still hints at QED effects. What the paper does well is present the new measurements clearly and apply standard tools without forcing the birefringence interpretation. The geometry argument against treating high PD as compelling evidence is straightforward and follows from the data. The soft spot is exactly the 1-sigma PD minimum. It is compatible with statistical fluctuation, atmospheric details not modeled, or small instrumental residuals, and no alternative explanations are tested or ruled out. The conclusion hedges but still invokes the feature as a positive hint, which overreaches given the significance. This work is for people following IXPE magnetar results and attempts to probe strong-field QED. Readers who need the latest polarization numbers and geometry constraints on this source will get something concrete from it. The dataset is new and the analysis is transparent enough to deserve a serious referee, though the marginal feature will likely need better quantification or softening in revision. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a 500 ks IXPE observation of magnetar 1E 1547.0-5408, reporting a thermal blackbody spectrum (kT_BB ≈ 0.67 keV, R_BB ≈ 1.2 km) and high linear polarization (PD = 47.7 ± 2.9%, PA = 75.8 ± 1.8°) in the 2–6 keV band. Phase-resolved analysis indicates emission from a single hot spot with non-uniform temperature. An RVM fit to the phase-dependent PA constrains the geometry (misaligned dipole and line-of-sight relative to spin axis). The authors argue that the high PD is not compelling evidence for vacuum birefringence due to this geometry, but interpret a 1σ PD minimum between 3–4 keV as a hint for partial mode conversion at the vacuum resonance, suggesting QED effects in magnetars.

Significance. If the marginal PD feature is robustly confirmed as vacuum-resonance mode conversion, the result would add a valuable observational anchor for QED vacuum birefringence predictions in magnetar atmospheres, complementing prior IXPE detections. The RVM-derived geometric constraints are a solid contribution to emission modeling. However, the 1σ level of the key feature limits the immediate significance, rendering the positive QED hint tentative rather than definitive.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (energy-dependent polarimetry): The PD minimum between 3 and 4 keV is reported only at the 1σ level with no accompanying statistical test (e.g., Δχ², p-value, or comparison to a null flat-PD model). This marginal detection is the sole observational anchor for the claim of partial mode conversion at the vacuum resonance; without quantification or exclusion of alternatives (atmospheric opacity, instrumental residuals), the interpretation that the RVM and PD behavior 'hint once more to the presence of QED effects' is not load-bearing.
[§5] §5 (discussion and conclusions): The statement that high PD 'cannot be regarded as compelling evidence for vacuum birefringence' is internally consistent with the RVM geometry, but the positive QED hint is then left resting on the same unquantified 1σ feature. No alternative atmospheric models are shown to be inconsistent with the data, weakening the overall interpretive claim.

minor comments (2)

[§3] Clarify whether the reported R_BB ≈ 1.2 km is the apparent or physical radius and how it compares to the neutron-star radius in the context of the hot-spot model.
[Abstract and §4] The abstract and text use 'some evidence (at the 1σ confidence level)' for the PD dip; expand this phrasing in the main text with explicit error bars or bin-by-bin values for transparency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their thorough and insightful comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each point and made revisions to address the concerns regarding the statistical significance of the polarization degree feature and the strength of the interpretive claims. Below we provide point-by-point responses.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and §4 (energy-dependent polarimetry): The PD minimum between 3 and 4 keV is reported only at the 1σ level with no accompanying statistical test (e.g., Δχ², p-value, or comparison to a null flat-PD model). This marginal detection is the sole observational anchor for the claim of partial mode conversion at the vacuum resonance; without quantification or exclusion of alternatives (atmospheric opacity, instrumental residuals), the interpretation that the RVM and PD behavior 'hint once more to the presence of QED effects' is not load-bearing.

Authors: We agree that a formal statistical assessment of the PD minimum would strengthen the analysis. In the revised manuscript, we have added a χ² comparison between the observed energy-dependent PD and a constant PD model. This confirms the marginal ~1σ nature of the feature. We have also included a brief discussion in §4 addressing potential alternatives: the spectral fit shows no indication of energy-dependent opacity changes that could produce such a dip, and cross-checks between IXPE detectors show no instrumental artifacts at this level. We have revised the language in the abstract and §4 to describe this as a 'marginal hint' rather than evidence, aligning with the referee's view that it is tentative. revision: partial
Referee: [§5] §5 (discussion and conclusions): The statement that high PD 'cannot be regarded as compelling evidence for vacuum birefringence' is internally consistent with the RVM geometry, but the positive QED hint is then left resting on the same unquantified 1σ feature. No alternative atmospheric models are shown to be inconsistent with the data, weakening the overall interpretive claim.

Authors: We concur that the QED hint is based on the marginal feature and have revised §5 to explicitly note the tentative nature of this interpretation and the need for future observations with higher sensitivity. Regarding alternative models, we have added text explaining that standard magnetized atmosphere models without vacuum resonance effects predict a monotonically increasing or flat PD with energy in this band, which is inconsistent with the observed dip at the current data quality. A full grid of atmospheric models is beyond the current scope but is planned for follow-up work. The geometric argument against compelling evidence for birefringence from the high PD remains unchanged and is now better contextualized with the marginal feature. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct observational measurements and standard RVM fit

full rationale

The paper reports new IXPE data on polarization degree and angle for 1E 1547.0-5408, fits the rotating vector model directly to the observed phase-dependent PA, and notes a marginal 1σ PD minimum. All quantities are measured from the data or obtained via standard geometric fitting; no step re-uses a fitted parameter as a 'prediction,' invokes a self-citation as the sole justification for a uniqueness claim, or renames an input as an output. The derivation chain is self-contained against the external IXPE observations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of magnetized neutron-star atmosphere models and the validity of the rotating-vector model for polarization angle; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the usual blackbody fit parameters.

free parameters (2)

blackbody temperature kT_BB
Fitted to the IXPE spectrum; value ~0.67 keV is reported but is a standard spectral parameter.
emission radius R_BB
Fitted parameter ~1.2 km; conventional in thermal spectral modeling.

axioms (2)

domain assumption X-ray emission originates from a single, localized hot spot on the neutron-star surface
Invoked to interpret the phase-resolved PA modulation and to apply the rotating vector model.
domain assumption The rotating vector model accurately describes the observed PA swing for a misaligned dipole
Standard assumption in pulsar and magnetar polarimetry; used to constrain geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5725 in / 1690 out tokens · 70045 ms · 2026-05-16T11:46:48.710825+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

work page 1996
[2]

2018, HENDRICS: High ENergy Data Reduction Interface from the Command Shell,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1805.019 http://ascl.net/1805.019

Bachetti, M. 2018, HENDRICS: High ENergy Data Reduction Interface from the Command Shell,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1805.019 http://ascl.net/1805.019

work page 2018
[3]

A., Cook, R., et al

Bachetti, M., Harrison, F. A., Cook, R., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 109, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/800/2/109

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/800/2/109 2015
[4]

D., et al

Baldini, L., Bucciantini, N., Lalla, N. D., et al. 2022, ixpeobssim: Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer simulator and analyzer,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2210.020 http://ascl.net/2210.020

work page 2022
[5]

L., Stella, L., et al

Bernardini, F., Israel, G. L., Stella, L., et al. 2011, A&A, 529, A19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016197 15

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016197 2011
[6]

Ransom, S. M. 2008, ApJ, 679, 681, doi: 10.1086/587054

work page doi:10.1086/587054 2008
[7]

2025, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol

Chen, C.-T., & IXPE Science Operation Center. 2025, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 245, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #245, 260.01 Coti Zelati, F., Rea, N., Pons, J. A., Campana, S., &

work page 2025
[8]

2018, MNRAS, 474, 961, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2679 Coti Zelati, F., Borghese, A., Rea, N., et al

Esposito, P. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 961, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2679 Coti Zelati, F., Borghese, A., Rea, N., et al. 2020, A&A, 633, A31, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936317 De Grandis, D., Turolla, R., Taverna, R., et al. 2022, ApJ, 936, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8797 Di Marco, A., Soffitta, P., Costa, E., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acba0f

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2679 2018
[9]

C., & Thompson, C

Duncan, R. C., & Thompson, C. 1992, ApJL, 392, L9, doi: 10.1086/186413

work page doi:10.1086/186413 1992
[10]

E., & Weisberg, J

Everett, J. E., & Weisberg, J. M. 2001, ApJ, 553, 341, doi: 10.1086/320652 Fern´ andez, R., & Davis, S. W. 2011, ApJ, 730, 131, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/131 Fern´ andez, R., & Thompson, C. 2007, ApJ, 660, 615, doi: 10.1086/511810

work page doi:10.1086/320652 2001
[11]

K., & Lai, D

Harding, A. K., & Lai, D. 2006, Reports on Progress in Physics, 69, 2631, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/69/9/R03

work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/69/9/r03 2006
[12]

2024, MNRAS, 527, 12219, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3680

Heyl, J., Taverna, R., Turolla, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 12219, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3680

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3680 2024
[13]

S., & Hernquist, L

Heyl, J. S., & Hernquist, L. 1997, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General, 30, 6485, doi: 10.1088/0305-4470/30/18/022

work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/30/18/022 1997
[14]

2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x Carnero Rosell, A., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Crocce, M., et al

Heyl, J. S., Shaviv, N. J., & Lloyd, D. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 134, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06521.x

work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06521.x 2003
[15]

Ho, W. C. G., & Lai, D. 2003, MNRAS, 338, 233, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06047.x

work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06047.x 2003
[16]

2019, MNRAS, 485, 640, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz400

Johnston, S., & Karastergiou, A. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 640, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz400

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz400 2019
[17]

D., Pavlov, G

Kaminker, A. D., Pavlov, G. G., & Shibanov, I. A. 1982, Ap&SS, 86, 249, doi: 10.1007/BF00683336

work page doi:10.1007/bf00683336 1982
[18]

M., & Beloborodov, A

Kaspi, V. M., & Beloborodov, A. M. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 261, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023329

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023329 2017
[19]

Kelly, R. M. E., Marshall, H. L., Zane, S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 987, 113, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adde58

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adde58 2025
[20]

Kelly, R. M. E., Zane, S., Turolla, R., & Taverna, R. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 3927, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae159

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae159 2024
[21]

Komesaroff, M. M. 1970, Nature, 225, 612, doi: 10.1038/225612a0

work page doi:10.1038/225612a0 1970
[22]

2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 120, e2216534120, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216534120

Lai, D. 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 120, e2216534120, doi: 10.1073/pnas.2216534120

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2216534120 2023
[23]

E., Younes, G., Scholz, P., et al

Lower, M. E., Younes, G., Scholz, P., et al. 2023, ApJ, 945, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbc7c

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbc7c 2023
[24]

2021, ApJ, 911, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe62f

Luo, J., Ransom, S., Demorest, P., et al. 2021, ApJ, 911, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe62f

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe62f 2021
[25]

N., Hobbs, G

Manchester, R. N., Hobbs, G. B., Teoh, A., & Hobbs, M. 2005, AJ, 129, 1993, doi: 10.1086/428488

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/428488 2005
[26]

L., Heine, S

Marshall, H. L., Heine, S. N. T., Garner, A., et al. 2021, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 11444, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder, S. Nikzad, & K. Nakazawa, 114442Y, doi: 10.1117/12.2562811

work page doi:10.1117/12.2562811 2021
[27]

P., Testa, V., Gonz´ alez Caniulef, D., et al

Mignani, R. P., Testa, V., Gonz´ alez Caniulef, D., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 492, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2798

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2798 2017
[28]

2008, MNRAS, 390, 769, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13778.x

Nobili, L., Turolla, R., & Zane, S. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 1527, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13125.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13125.x 2008
[29]

G., & Shibanov, Y

Pavlov, G. G., & Shibanov, Y. A. 1979, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 49, 741

work page 1979
[30]

2004, MNRAS, 351, 161, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07764.x

Piconcelli, E., Jimenez-Bail´ on, E., Guainazzi, M., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 161, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07764.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07764.x 2004
[31]

Radhakrishnan, V., & Cooke, D. J. 1969, Astrophys. Lett., 3, 225

work page 1969
[32]

2025, ApJL, 985, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adbffb

Rigoselli, M., Taverna, R., Mereghetti, S., et al. 2025, ApJL, 985, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adbffb

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbffb 2025
[33]

2012, A&A, 541, A66, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118489

Sartore, N., Tiengo, A., Mereghetti, S., et al. 2012, A&A, 541, A66, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118489

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118489 2012
[34]

E., Younes, G

Stewart, R. E., Younes, G. A., Harding, A. K., et al. 2025a, ApJL, 985, L35, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adbffa

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbffa 2041
[35]

E., Dinh Thi, H., Younes, G., et al

Stewart, R. E., Dinh Thi, H., Younes, G., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.19446, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.19446

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.19446
[36]

Strohmayer, T. E. 2017, ApJ, 838, 72, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa643d

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa643d 2017
[37]

2014, MNRAS, 438, 1686, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2310

Taverna, R., Muleri, F., Turolla, R., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 1686, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2310

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2310 2014
[38]

2024, Galaxies, 12, 6, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12010006

Taverna, R., & Turolla, R. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 6, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12010006

work page doi:10.3390/galaxies12010006 2024
[39]

2015, MNRAS, 454, 3254, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2168

Taverna, R., Turolla, R., Gonzalez Caniulef, D., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3254, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2168

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2168 2015
[40]

Y., & Zane, S

Taverna, R., Turolla, R., Suleimanov, V., Potekhin, A. Y., & Zane, S. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 5057, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa204

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa204 2020
[41]

2022, Science, 378, 646, doi: 10.1126/science.add0080 16

Taverna, R., Turolla, R., Muleri, F., et al. 2022, Science, 378, 646, doi: 10.1126/science.add0080 16

work page doi:10.1126/science.add0080 2022
[42]

Thompson, C., & Duncan, R. C. 1993, ApJ, 408, 194, doi: 10.1086/172580

work page doi:10.1086/172580 1993
[43]

Thompson, C., Lyutikov, M., & Kulkarni, S. R. 2002, ApJ, 574, 332, doi: 10.1086/340586

work page doi:10.1086/340586 2002
[44]

2010, ApJ, 710, 227, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/227

Tiengo, A., Vianello, G., Esposito, P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 710, 227, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/227

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/710/1/227 2010
[45]

F., Wang, H

Tong, H., Wang, P. F., Wang, H. G., & Yan, Z. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 1549, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab108

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab108 2021
[46]

2009, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol

Turolla, R. 2009, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 357, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ed. W. Becker, 141, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-76965-1 7

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76965-1 2009
[47]

Turolla, R., Zane, S., & Watts, A. L. 2015, Reports on Progress in Physics, 78, 116901, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/78/11/116901

work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/11/116901 2015
[48]

L., et al

Turolla, R., Taverna, R., Israel, G. L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aced05

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aced05 2023
[49]

A., Ferland, G

Verner, D. A., Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., & Yakovlev, D. G. 1996, ApJ, 465, 487, doi: 10.1086/177435

work page doi:10.1086/177435 1996
[50]

S., & Santini, P

Wang, C., & Lai, D. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 515, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14895.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14895.x 2009
[51]

C., Guainazzi, M., Jahoda, K., et al

Weisskopf, M. C., Guainazzi, M., Jahoda, K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, 912, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/912

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/713/2/912 2010
[52]

C., Soffitta, P., Baldini, L., et al

Weisskopf, M. C., Soffitta, P., Baldini, L., et al. 2022, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 8, 1 , doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.8.2.026002

work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.8.2.026002 2022
[53]

2000, ApJ, 542, 914, doi: 10.1086/317016

Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914, doi: 10.1086/317016

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/317016 2000
[54]

2023, ApJL, 944, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb703

Zane, S., Taverna, R., Gonz´ alez-Caniulef, D., et al. 2023, ApJL, 944, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb703

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acb703 2023
[55]

2025, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 68, 119502, doi: 10.1007/s11433-025-2786-6

Zhang, S.-N., Santangelo, A., Xu, Y., et al. 2025, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 68, 119502, doi: 10.1007/s11433-025-2786-6

work page doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2786-6 2025