pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.16974 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-23 · 🪐 quant-ph

An operational continuum limit of quantum combs

Clara Wassner , Jon\'a\v{s} Fuksa , Jens Eisert , Gregory A. L. White This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 11:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum combsprocess tensorcontinuum limitbosonic Fock spacemulti-time correlationsnon-Markovian dynamicsquantum stochastic processes
0
0 comments X

The pith

The discrete Choi matrix of a quantum comb maps to a vector in bosonic Fock space, yielding a rigorously defined continuous process tensor.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a continuous version of the process tensor by embedding the discrete multi-partite Choi matrix that describes a quantum comb into bosonic Fock space. This embedding is constructed so that the resulting object is defined intrinsically in the continuum without additional regularization steps. The framework then supports an information-theoretic analysis of multi-time correlations by representing them as continuous matrix product states. A sympathetic reader would care because it supplies the missing mathematical link between discrete quantum-information descriptions of non-Markovian processes and the continuous-time dynamics that arise in real physical systems.

Core claim

We introduce a fully continuous process tensor framework by showing how the discrete multi-partite Choi matrix becomes a vector in bosonic Fock space, which is intrinsically and rigorously defined in the continuum. With this equipped, we lay out the core structural elements of this framework and its properties. This translation allows for an information-theoretic treatment of multi-time correlations in the continuum via the analysis of their continuous matrix product state representatives.

What carries the argument

the mapping that sends the discrete multi-partite Choi matrix to a vector in bosonic Fock space, thereby carrying the operational and causal structure of the quantum comb into the continuum

If this is right

  • Multi-time quantum correlations can now be treated directly with continuum methods instead of taking discrete limits after the fact.
  • Continuous matrix product state representations become available for analyzing the information content of quantum stochastic processes.
  • Many-body physics techniques can be applied to study non-Markovian open quantum systems in the continuum.
  • The framework supplies a well-defined object on which to perform information-theoretic calculations for processes with genuinely continuous time.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Numerical simulations of continuous-time non-Markovian dynamics could be performed by representing the process tensor as a Fock-space vector and applying standard many-body truncation methods.
  • The same embedding might be used to connect discrete quantum combs to models of quantum fields or relativistic stochastic processes.
  • Experimental tests could compare predictions from the continuous object against measured multi-time statistics in systems with tunable time resolution.

Load-bearing premise

The bosonic Fock-space embedding preserves the operational and causal structure of the original discrete process tensor without requiring additional regularization or renormalization that would alter the information-theoretic content.

What would settle it

A calculation that takes the continuous Fock-space vector, discretizes it back to finite time steps, and finds that the resulting object either fails to recover the original Choi matrix or violates the causal ordering required of a process tensor.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.16974 by Clara Wassner, Gregory A. L. White, Jens Eisert, Jon\'a\v{s} Fuksa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. A high-level depiction of the results presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum combs are powerful conceptual tools for capturing multi-time processes in quantum information theory, constituting the most general quantum mechanical process. But, despite their causal nature, they lack a meaningful physical connection to time -- and are, by and large, arguably incompatible with it without extra structure. The subclass of quantum combs which assumes an underlying process is described by the so-called process tensor framework, which has been successfully used to study and characterise non-Markovian open quantum systems. But, although process tensors are motivated by an underlying dynamics, it is not a priori clear how to connect them to a continuous process tensor object mathematically -- leaving an uncomfortable conceptual gap. In this work, we take a decisive step toward remedying this situation. We introduce a fully continuous process tensor framework by showing how the discrete multi-partite Choi matrix becomes a vector in bosonic Fock space, which is intrinsically and rigorously defined in the continuum. With this equipped, we lay out the core structural elements of this framework and its properties. This translation allows for an information-theoretic treatment of multi-time correlations in the continuum via the analysis of their continuous matrix product state representatives. Our work closes a gap in the quantum information literature, and opens up the opportunity for the application of many-body physics insights to our understanding of quantum stochastic processes in the continuum.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a continuous process tensor framework for quantum combs by embedding the discrete multi-partite Choi matrix of a process tensor into a vector in bosonic Fock space. It claims this mapping provides an intrinsically defined continuum limit that preserves operational and causal structure, enabling information-theoretic analysis of multi-time correlations via continuous matrix product state representatives. The work outlines core structural elements, properties, and connections to many-body physics for non-Markovian open quantum systems.

Significance. If the embedding rigorously preserves causality and no-signaling conditions without additional renormalization, this bridges discrete quantum information with continuous-time many-body techniques, allowing tensor-network methods to analyze quantum stochastic processes in the continuum. It addresses a conceptual gap between discrete process tensors and physical time, with potential for new insights into non-Markovian dynamics.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.2] §4.2, around Eq. (17): The claim that the bosonic Fock-space embedding preserves the no-signaling-to-the-past conditions (partial trace over future slices independent of earlier interventions) is not supported by an explicit check that the continuum limit commutes with the causality projectors. The construction appears to rely on an implicit mode-ordering correspondence from the discrete case, but bosonic Fock space is unordered by default; without a regularization step or explicit time-ordering operator, the resulting object may describe a broader class of processes than the original discrete combs.
  2. [§3.1] §3.1, Eq. (9): The mapping from the discrete Choi matrix to the Fock-space vector is presented as direct, but the derivation lacks an error bound or convergence analysis showing that the information-theoretic content (e.g., the process tensor's multi-time correlations) is preserved in the limit; this is load-bearing for the 'operational continuum limit' central claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction use 'fully continuous' without clarifying whether the framework is a strict continuum limit or a continuous representation of discrete objects; this notation should be tightened for clarity.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption does not specify the discretization parameter or the continuum limit procedure used in the numerical example, making it hard to reproduce the plotted correlations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped clarify several aspects of the construction. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2, around Eq. (17): The claim that the bosonic Fock-space embedding preserves the no-signaling-to-the-past conditions (partial trace over future slices independent of earlier interventions) is not supported by an explicit check that the continuum limit commutes with the causality projectors. The construction appears to rely on an implicit mode-ordering correspondence from the discrete case, but bosonic Fock space is unordered by default; without a regularization step or explicit time-ordering operator, the resulting object may describe a broader class of processes than the original discrete combs.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification would strengthen the presentation. In the construction, each discrete time slice is mapped to a distinct bosonic mode whose label carries the time coordinate; the Fock-space basis is therefore ordered by these labels, and the partial trace over future modes is performed with respect to this ordering. This ensures that the no-signaling-to-the-past conditions are inherited directly from the discrete case. Nevertheless, we will add an explicit calculation in the revised manuscript (new paragraph after Eq. (17) and a short appendix) demonstrating that the causality projectors commute with the continuum limit and that the resulting object satisfies the same no-signaling relations as the original quantum comb. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.1] §3.1, Eq. (9): The mapping from the discrete Choi matrix to the Fock-space vector is presented as direct, but the derivation lacks an error bound or convergence analysis showing that the information-theoretic content (e.g., the process tensor's multi-time correlations) is preserved in the limit; this is load-bearing for the 'operational continuum limit' central claim.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the current text does not supply quantitative error bounds. The mapping in Eq. (9) is defined so that the discrete multi-partite Choi matrix becomes the exact coefficient vector of the corresponding Fock-space state once the time discretization is taken to the continuum; the multi-time correlations are therefore preserved exactly by the isomorphism between the finite tensor-product space and the Fock space in the limit. To make this rigorous, we will insert a brief convergence discussion immediately after Eq. (9), showing that the trace-norm distance between the discrete process tensor and its continuous representative vanishes as the time-step size tends to zero, thereby confirming that all information-theoretic quantities are preserved in the operational continuum limit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: direct embedding construction from discrete Choi matrix to Fock-space vector

full rationale

The paper's core step is a mathematical re-interpretation that maps the existing discrete multi-partite Choi matrix of a process tensor onto a vector in bosonic Fock space, which is already rigorously defined in the continuum. No parameters are fitted to data, no predictions are made that reduce to the inputs by construction, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are imported via self-citation. The derivation remains self-contained against standard definitions of process tensors and Fock space; the continuum object is obtained by embedding rather than by solving an equation whose solution is presupposed. This is the most common honest non-finding for a purely constructive re-framing paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on the standard definition of bosonic Fock space and the Choi isomorphism for quantum combs; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Bosonic Fock space is rigorously defined for continuous time and carries a natural inner product compatible with the Choi representation.
    Invoked to justify that the discrete Choi matrix can be viewed as a vector inside an already-continuous space.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5541 in / 1197 out tokens · 27514 ms · 2026-05-16T11:42:16.144731+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 103 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    out- come

    Deriving robust continuum measures of quantum non-Markovianity Although we do not aim to resolve this question of Choi divergence versus comb divergence in its full generality in the present work, let us now turn to the specific prob- lem of properly defining and measuring quantum non- Markovianity in the continuum. In analogy to MPS in 21 the discrete ca...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Hardy, Phil

    L. Hardy, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A370, 3385–3417 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    Strathearn, P

    A. Strathearn, P. Kirton, D. Kilda, J. Keeling, and B. W. Lovett, Nature Comm.9, 3322 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Cygorek, M

    M. Cygorek, M. Cosacchi, A. Vagov, V. M. Axt, B. W. Lovett, J. Keeling, and E. M. Gauger, Nature Phys.18, 662 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    G. A. L. White, F. A. Pollock, L. C. L. Hollenberg, C. D. Hill, and K. Modi, Quantum9, 1695 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    G. A. L. White, F. A. Pollock, L. C. L. Hollenberg, K. Modi, and C. D. Hill, PRX Quantum3, 020344 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    G. A. L. White, C. D. Hill, F. A. Pollock, L. C. L. Hol- lenberg, and K. Modi, Nature Comm.11, 6301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    I. A. Aloisio, G. A. L. White, C. D. Hill, and K. Modi, PRX Quantum4, 020310 (2022), 2209.10870

    work page arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    G. A. L. White, P. Jurcevic, C. D. Hill, and K. Modi, Phys. Rev. X15, 021047 (2025)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Dowling, K

    N. Dowling, K. Modi, R. N. Mu˜ noz, S. Singh, and G. A. L. White, Phys. Rev. X14, 041018 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    F. A. Pollock, C. Rodr´ ıguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, M. Paternostro, and K. Modi, Phys. Rev. A97, 012127 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    S. Milz, C. Spee, Z.-P. Xu, F. A. Pollock, K. Modi, and O. G¨ uhne, SciPost Phys.10, 141 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    G. E. Fux, E. P. Butler, P. R. Eastham, B. W. Lovett, and J. Keeling, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 200401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Gribben, A

    D. Gribben, A. Strathearn, G. E. Fux, P. Kirton, and B. W. Lovett, Quantum6, 847 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Chiribella, G

    G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, and P. Perinotti, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 060401 (2008)

    work page 2008

  16. [16]

    Cotler, C.-M

    J. Cotler, C.-M. Jian, X.-L. Qi, and F. Wilczek, JHEP 2018(9), 93

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Oreshkov, F

    O. Oreshkov, F. Costa, and C. Brukner, Nature Comm. 3, 1092 (2012)

    work page 2012

  18. [19]

    G. A. L. White, F. Pollock, L. C. L. Hollenberg, K. Modi, and C. D. Hill, PRX Quantum3, 020344 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [20]

    Chiribella, G

    G. Chiribella, G. M. D’Ariano, and P. Perinotti, Phys. Rev. A80, 022339 (2009)

    work page 2009

  20. [21]

    Gutoski and J

    G. Gutoski and J. Watrous, inProceedings of the thirty- ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, STOC07 (ACM, 2007) p. 565–574

    work page 2007

  21. [22]

    Dowling and K

    N. Dowling and K. Modi, PRX Quantum5, 010314 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [23]

    Lindblad, Commun

    G. Lindblad, Commun. Math. Phys.65, 281 (1979)

    work page 1979

  23. [24]

    Tingley, Notes on fock space (2023), arXiv:2211.12463

    P. Tingley, Notes on fock space (2023), arXiv:2211.12463

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [25]

    Verstraete and J

    F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 190405 (2010)

    work page 2010

  25. [26]

    T. J. Osborne, J. Eisert, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 260401 (2010)

    work page 2010

  26. [27]

    Haegeman, T

    J. Haegeman, T. J. Osborne, H. Verschelde, and F. Ver- straete, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 100402 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [28]

    Tilloy, Phys

    A. Tilloy, Phys. Rev. D104, 096007 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [29]

    Shachar and E

    T. Shachar and E. Zohar, Phys. Rev. D105, 045016 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [30]

    J. I. Cirac, D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, N. Schuch, and F. Ver- straete, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 045003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [31]

    Link, H.-H

    V. Link, H.-H. Tu, and W. T. Strunz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 200403 (2024). 29

    work page 2024

  31. [32]

    G. Park, N. Ng, D. R. Reichman, and G. K.-L. Chan, Phys. Rev. B110, 045104 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [33]

    F. A. Pollock, C. Rodr´ ıguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, M. Paternostro, and K. Modi, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 040405 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [34]

    Zambon, Phys

    G. Zambon, Phys. Rev. A110, 042210 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [35]

    Le Hur, Quantum phase transitions in spin-boson systems: Dissipation and light phenomena, inUnder- standing quantum phase transitions, edited by L

    K. Le Hur, Quantum phase transitions in spin-boson systems: Dissipation and light phenomena, inUnder- standing quantum phase transitions, edited by L. D. Carr (CRC Press, New York, 2010) pp. 217–240

    work page 2010

  35. [36]

    Milz and K

    S. Milz and K. Modi, PRX Quantum2, 030201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [37]

    Accardi, A

    L. Accardi, A. Frigerio, and J. T. Lewis, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sc.18, 97 (1982)

    work page 1982

  37. [38]

    R. L. Hudson and K. R. Parthasarathy, Communica- tions in mathematical physics93, 301 (1984)

    work page 1984

  38. [39]

    H. I. Nurdin and J. Gough, in2021 60th IEEE Confer- ence on Decision and Control (CDC)(IEEE, 2021) p. 4164–4169

    work page 2021

  39. [40]

    M. M. Wolf, Quantum channels and operations-guided tour (2012), lecture notes

    work page 2012

  40. [41]

    S. Milz, M. Kim, F. A. Pollock, and K. Modi, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 040401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [42]

    Pechukas, Phys

    P. Pechukas, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 1060 (1994)

    work page 1994

  42. [43]

    S. Milz, F. Sakuldee, F. A. Pollock, and K. Modi, Quan- tum4, 255 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [44]

    Haegeman, J

    J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, and F. Ver- straete, Phys. Rev. B88, 085118 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [45]

    Tilloy, Notes on continuous tensor network states, https://atilloy.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ lecture_tensor21.pdf(2021), lecture notes

    A. Tilloy, Notes on continuous tensor network states, https://atilloy.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ lecture_tensor21.pdf(2021), lecture notes

    work page 2021

  45. [46]

    K. R. Parthasarathy, Quantum stochastic calculus and quantum gaussian processes (2014), arXiv:1408.5686 [math-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  46. [47]

    Gardiner and P

    C. Gardiner and P. Zoller,Quantum noise: a handbook of Markovian and non-Markovian quantum stochastic methods with applications to quantum optics(Springer Science & Business Media, 2004)

    work page 2004

  47. [48]

    Choi, Lin

    M.-D. Choi, Lin. Alg. Appl.10, 285 (1975)

    work page 1975

  48. [49]

    Jamiolkowski, Rep

    A. Jamiolkowski, Rep. Math. Phys.3, 275 (1972)

    work page 1972

  49. [50]

    Continuous matrix product operators for quantum fields

    E. Tjoa and J. I. Cirac, Continuous matrix product op- erators for quantum fields (2025), arXiv:2511.04545

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [51]

    S. Milz, F. A. Pollock, and K. Modi, Phys. Rev. A98, 012108 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [52]

    Kliesch, D

    M. Kliesch, D. Gross, and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160503 (2014)

    work page 2014

  52. [53]

    Tuybens, J

    B. Tuybens, J. D. Nardis, J. Haegeman, and F. Ver- straete, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 020501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [54]

    Rinc´ on, M

    J. Rinc´ on, M. Ganahl, and G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. B92, 115107 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [55]

    Continuous Matrix Product States for Inhomogeneous Quantum Field Theories: a Basis-Spline Approach

    M. Ganahl, Continuous matrix product states for inho- mogeneous quantum field theories: A basis-spline ap- proach (2017), arXiv:1712.01260

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  55. [56]

    Le Hur, Ann

    K. Le Hur, Ann. Phys.323, 2208 (2008)

    work page 2008

  56. [57]

    M. C. Gutzwiller, Phys. Rev. Lett.10, 159 (1963)

    work page 1963

  57. [58]

    B¨ unemann, F

    J. B¨ unemann, F. Gebhard, K. Radn´ oczi, and P. Fazekas, J. Phys. Cond. Matt.17, 3807 (2005)

    work page 2005

  58. [59]

    J. P. T. Stenger, C. S. Hellberg, and D. Gunlycke, Phys. Rev. A107, 062606 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [60]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn,Quantum measure- ment and control, first paperback edition ed. (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014)

    work page 2014

  60. [61]

    Guilmin, P

    P. Guilmin, P. Rouchon, and A. Tilloy, Parameters es- timation by fitting correlation functions of continuous quantum measurement (2024), arXiv:2410.11955

    work page arXiv 2024

  61. [62]

    A. J. B. Rosal, P. P. Potts, and G. T. Landi, Determin- istic equations for feedback control of open quantum systems (2025), arXiv:2507.01934 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [63]

    H. M. Wiseman and L. Diosi, Chem. Phys.268, 91 (2001)

    work page 2001

  63. [64]

    M. M. Wolf, J. Eisert, T. S. Cubitt, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 150402 (2008)

    work page 2008

  64. [65]

    Chru´ sci´ nski, A

    D. Chru´ sci´ nski, A. Kossakowski, and A. Rivas, Phys. Rev. A83, 052128 (2011)

    work page 2011

  65. [66]

    Rivas, S

    ´A. Rivas, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 094001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  66. [67]

    Breuer, E.-M

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-M. Laine, and J. Piilo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009)

    work page 2009

  67. [68]

    Groeblacher, A

    S. Groeblacher, A. Trubarov, N. Prigge, M. Aspelmeyer, and J. Eisert, Nature Comm.6, 7606 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [69]

    Arenz, R

    C. Arenz, R. Hillier, M. Fraas, and D. Burgarth, Phys. Rev. A92, 022102 (2015)

    work page 2015

  69. [70]

    Sonner, A

    M. Sonner, A. Lerose, and D. A. Abanin, Ann. Phys. Special Issue on Philip W. Anderson,435, 168677 (2021)

    work page 2021

  70. [71]

    Khatri and M

    S. Khatri and M. M. Wilde, Principles of quantum communication theory: A modern approach (2024), arXiv:2011.04672

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [72]

    K. M. R. Audenaert and J. Eisert, J. Math. Phys.46, 102104 (2005)

    work page 2005

  72. [73]

    H¨ ubener, A

    R. H¨ ubener, A. Mari, and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 040401 (2013)

    work page 2013

  73. [74]

    Koch and C

    O. Koch and C. Lubich, SIAM J. Mat. Ana. Appl.29, 434 (2007)

    work page 2007

  74. [75]

    Ceruti, J

    G. Ceruti, J. Kusch, and C. Lubich, BIT Num. Math. 62, 1149 (2022)

    work page 2022

  75. [76]

    Lubich and I

    C. Lubich and I. V. Oseledets, BIT Num. Math.54, 171 (2014)

    work page 2014

  76. [77]

    Haegeman, D

    J. Haegeman, D. Draxler, V. Stojevic, I. Cirac, T. Os- borne, and F. Verstraete, SciPost Phys.3, 006 (2017)

    work page 2017

  77. [78]

    Haegeman, C

    J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. B94, 165116 (2016)

    work page 2016

  78. [79]

    Defect production in nonlinear quench across a quantum critical point,

    L. Hackl, T. Guaita, T. Shi, J. Haegeman, E. Dem- ler, and I. Cirac, SciPost Physics9, 10.21468/scipost- phys.9.4.048 (2020)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipost- 2020

  79. [80]

    Giarmatzi, T

    C. Giarmatzi, T. Jones, A. Gilchrist, P. Pakkiam, A. Fe- dorov, and F. Costa, Quantum9, 1952 (2025)

    work page 1952

  80. [81]

    Shrapnel, F

    S. Shrapnel, F. Costa, and G. Milburn, Int. J.Quant. Inf.16, 1840010 (2018)

    work page 2018

Showing first 80 references.