pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.17675 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-25 · 🪐 quant-ph

Realisation of a Protected Cat-Qutrit Manifold via Engineered Quantum Tunnelling

Sangil Kwon , Daisuke Hoshi , Toshiaki Nagase , Daichi Sugiyama , Hiroto Mukai , Kengo Takemura , Rintaro Kojima , Yu Zhou
show 3 more authors
Shohei Watabe Fumiki Yoshihara Jaw-Shen Tsai
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 11:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords Kerr parametric oscillatorcat statesqutritquantum tunnelingphase space dynamicsbosonic encodingenergy gap measurement
0
0 comments X

The pith

A three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator hosts a protected cat-qutrit manifold whose energy gap is directly measured via phase-space breathing dynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how combining a Kerr nonlinearity with a three-photon drive creates a bosonic system whose lowest three states form a protected manifold of cat-like states. Quantum coherence is confirmed by three-photon Rabi oscillations and by Wigner-function snapshots that display three-component interference patterns in phase space. A breathing-like oscillation in the mean photon number appears, whose frequency directly reports the energy gap separating the protected manifold from higher states. This gap measurement serves as an experimental signature that the manifold is shielded by the engineered tunneling. The work also traces the main limit on photon number to a parasitic higher-order pump term that must be suppressed for stronger protection.

Core claim

The central claim is that a three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator realizes a protected cat-qutrit manifold: the combination of Kerr nonlinearity and three-photon drive produces degenerate tunneling that stabilizes three-component cat states, and the resulting breathing dynamics in phase space furnish a direct time-domain measurement of the protective energy gap between the manifold and the excited states.

What carries the argument

Three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator, in which a Kerr nonlinearity plus a three-photon pump creates phase-space tunneling that isolates a degenerate manifold of three-component cat states.

If this is right

  • The measured energy gap provides a concrete benchmark for how well the qutrit manifold is protected against leakage.
  • Suppressing the identified higher-order pump term is required to increase mean photon number and thereby strengthen the protection.
  • Direct Wigner tomography and three-photon Rabi oscillations together demonstrate that the manifold supports coherent superpositions of cat states.
  • The same tunneling mechanism offers a route to bosonic qutrits that encode information in phase-space geometry rather than in separate physical modes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the three-photon drive to higher-order pumps could stabilize manifolds with more than three states for qudit encodings.
  • The breathing-frequency method may be adapted to diagnose protection in other driven bosonic systems such as four-photon or six-photon oscillators.
  • Hardware improvements that reduce the parasitic pump term would simultaneously raise the gap and allow larger cat amplitudes, testable by repeating the Wigner measurements at higher drive strengths.

Load-bearing premise

The observed breathing-like oscillation in mean photon number is produced specifically by temporal interference between the cat-qutrit manifold and higher excited states rather than by measurement artifacts or unrelated dynamical effects.

What would settle it

Absence of breathing oscillations in the mean photon number, or observation of an oscillation frequency that does not match the independently calculated energy gap between the three lowest states and the next manifold, would falsify the claim that the dynamics directly measure manifold protection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.17675 by Daichi Sugiyama, Daisuke Hoshi, Fumiki Yoshihara, Hiroto Mukai, Jaw-Shen Tsai, Kengo Takemura, Rintaro Kojima, Sangil Kwon, Shohei Watabe, Toshiaki Nagase, Yu Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Chip and qutrit states. a Photograph of the chip containing the KPO. The state of the KPO is measured by a nearby transmon and its readout resonator. b Circuit diagram of the Kerr parametric oscillator (KPO), which consists of two direct-current superconducting quantum interference devices (DC SQUIDs) and four junctions with a shunting capacitor. c The classical energy landscape corresponding to the Hamilt… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Three-photon Rabi oscillations. a Pulse sequence used for measuring Rabi oscillations. The control parameters are shown in magenta, and “π” denotes the transmon π-pulses. b,c Rabi oscillations observed in the weak (P ≪ K) and moderate (P ∼ K) pump regimes, respectively. The simulation results in (c) clearly show that the contribution of the higher-order pump term (η term) must be included to quantitatively… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Wigner functions of three-photon KPO states. a Pulse sequence for measuring the Wigner function. The pump-pulse conditions are as follows: P/K = 0.822, PCD/P = 0.3, where PCD is the amplitude of the counterdiabatic component of the pump, τramp = 0.4 µs, and τhold = 0.1 µs. b Wigner functions of the KPO states for various ∆/K values. The measured raw data are shown in the top row, the corresponding reconstr… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dynamics and relaxation. a Time evolution of the mean photon number, showing oscillations caused by imperfect adiabatic conversion from the |0⟩ state to the |0C⟩ state. The dashed line is a fit to a simple decaying cosine function, with fitted parameters ffit and τfit shown. b Time evolution of the fidelity for the qutrit states and |0 ex C ⟩. Within the label “Qutrit + excited space,” the excited space re… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Steady states. a The mean photon number of the steady states as a function of the detuning, ∆/K. The symbols represent the values extracted from the den￾sity matrix reconstructed via Wigner function measure￾ment. The lines are results from the steady-state solution of the Lindblad master equation derived from Eq. (1). The effect of single-photon loss during parity measurement is included in the solid line … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Circuit diagram of the KPO. The KPO consists of N1 direct-current superconducting quantum interference devices (DC SQUIDs) and a Josephson junction array whose number of junctions is N2. EJ1a and CJ1a (EJ1b and CJ1b) represent the Josephson energy and the capacitance of the smaller (larger) junction in each DC SQUID, respectively. Cs denotes the shunting capacitance of the KPO, and Φex is the external magn… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Effect of single-photon loss in the KPO during parity measurement. The states under investigation are as follows: a three-component cat state with α = 1.6; b even cat state with α = 1.6; c Fock state |3⟩. The insets show Wigner functions within the displacement ±3 range in the absence of loss. The symbols correspond to a simulated parity measurement taken along the dashed line, while the solid lines repres… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Engineering quantum tunnelling in phase space has emerged as a viable method for creating a protected logical qubit manifold with biased-noise properties. A promising approach is to combine a Kerr nonlinearity with a multi-photon drive, resulting in a system known as a Kerr parametric oscillator (KPO). In this work, we implement a three-photon KPO and explore its potential as a protected bosonic qutrit. We confirm quantum coherence by demonstrating three-photon Rabi oscillations and performing direct Wigner function measurements that reveal the formation of three-component cat-like states. Crucially, we observe a breathing-like dynamic in phase space, a characteristic feature of driven quantum systems. This dynamic arises from macroscopic temporal interference between the cat-qutrit manifold and the excited states. The frequency of resulting oscillations in the mean photon number provides a direct, time-domain measurement of the energy gap separating the qutrit from the excited states, thereby establishing an experimental hallmark of qutrit manifold protection. Furthermore, we identify a parasitic higher-order pump term as the primary mechanism constraining the mean photon number, highlighting its mitigation as a requisite for maximising protection. Our findings elucidate the basic quantum properties of the three-photon KPO and establish the first step towards its use as an alternative qutrit platform.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the experimental realization of a three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator (KPO) as a protected bosonic qutrit. It demonstrates coherence via three-photon Rabi oscillations and direct Wigner tomography showing three-component cat-like states. The central result is the observation of breathing-like dynamics in phase space, interpreted as macroscopic temporal interference between the qutrit manifold and excited states; the frequency of mean-photon-number oscillations is presented as a direct time-domain measurement of the manifold-excited-state energy gap, serving as an experimental hallmark of protection. A parasitic higher-order pump term is identified as the primary limit on photon number.

Significance. If the breathing-dynamics attribution holds, the work provides the first experimental demonstration of a protected cat-qutrit manifold and a concrete time-domain signature of manifold protection, extending prior KPO qubit results. The direct Wigner tomography and Rabi data supply solid support for coherence, while the identification of the parasitic pump term supplies actionable information for future device improvement.

major comments (2)
  1. [breathing-dynamics results and parasitic-term discussion] The claim that the observed mean-photon-number oscillations constitute a direct measurement of the energy gap (abstract and breathing-dynamics section) rests on the interpretation that the breathing arises specifically from manifold-excited-state interference. The manuscript identifies a parasitic higher-order pump term as the dominant photon-number constraint yet provides no quantitative model-to-data comparison or control that excludes this term (or drive-induced transients) from contributing to or shifting the observed oscillation frequency. This is load-bearing for the hallmark-protection claim.
  2. [energy-gap extraction paragraph] The energy-gap extraction from the oscillation frequency assumes the breathing period directly reflects the manifold-excited gap without additional dynamical contributions. No simulation or fit that includes the parasitic pump amplitude is shown to confirm that the extracted frequency remains unchanged when this term is varied within its experimental bounds.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Wigner tomography subsection] The precise definition of the three-component cat states used for Wigner tomography could be stated more explicitly (e.g., target superposition coefficients).
  2. [figure captions] Figure captions for the phase-space breathing data should include the exact drive parameters and averaging details to allow direct reproduction of the oscillation frequency.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point-by-point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions to strengthen the presentation of our results on the breathing dynamics and energy gap measurement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The claim that the observed mean-photon-number oscillations constitute a direct measurement of the energy gap (abstract and breathing-dynamics section) rests on the interpretation that the breathing arises specifically from manifold-excited-state interference. The manuscript identifies a parasitic higher-order pump term as the dominant photon-number constraint yet provides no quantitative model-to-data comparison or control that excludes this term (or drive-induced transients) from contributing to or shifting the observed oscillation frequency. This is load-bearing for the hallmark-protection claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a quantitative model-to-data comparison would provide stronger support for our interpretation. In the revised manuscript, we include a numerical simulation of the three-photon KPO dynamics incorporating the parasitic higher-order pump term with its amplitude fitted to match the observed steady-state photon number. The simulation reproduces the observed oscillation frequency, and varying the parasitic amplitude within experimental bounds shifts the frequency by less than 10%, which is within our measurement uncertainty. We also discuss why drive-induced transients are unlikely to contribute at the observed timescale based on the system parameters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The energy-gap extraction from the oscillation frequency assumes the breathing period directly reflects the manifold-excited gap without additional dynamical contributions. No simulation or fit that includes the parasitic pump amplitude is shown to confirm that the extracted frequency remains unchanged when this term is varied within its experimental bounds.

    Authors: We agree that explicit confirmation is needed. We have added a supplementary analysis where we perform fits to the mean-photon-number oscillations using the full Hamiltonian including the parasitic term. The extracted frequency matches the independently calculated manifold-excited state gap from the undriven spectrum, and remains stable when the parasitic amplitude is varied over the range consistent with our data. This supports that the breathing frequency provides a reliable time-domain measure of the protection gap. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental measurements with direct frequency-to-gap mapping

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental report on a three-photon KPO. It demonstrates Rabi oscillations, Wigner tomography of cat-like states, and breathing dynamics whose oscillation frequency is read out directly as the qutrit-excited-state gap. No derivation chain, fitted-parameter prediction, or self-citation load-bearing step is present; the central claim follows from time-domain data without reduction to the paper's own inputs or prior self-citations. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the standard driven Kerr oscillator model; the main experimental addition is the three-photon drive implementation and the interpretation of breathing as protection signature. No new entities postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • parasitic higher-order pump amplitude
    Identified as the primary limiter of mean photon number; its strength is inferred from data rather than derived from first principles.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The driven nonlinear resonator is accurately described by a Kerr parametric oscillator Hamiltonian with a three-photon drive term.
    Standard model in circuit QED and parametric oscillator literature invoked to interpret all dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5570 in / 1248 out tokens · 41978 ms · 2026-05-16T11:40:20.405454+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum theory of a three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The three-photon Kerr parametric oscillator exhibits a threefold degenerate ground state of superpositions of squeezed states, tunable to anti-squeezing, for a protected Kerr-cat qutrit.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Blais, A

    A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wall- raff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics , Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    S. Kwon, A. Tomonaga, G. Lakshmi Bhai, S. J. De- vitt, and J.-S. Tsai,Gate-based superconducting quan- tum computing, J. Appl. Phys. 129, 041102 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits , Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021318 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    X. Gu, A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, Y.-x. Liu, and F. Nori, Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits, Phys. Rep. 718–719, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    B. M. Terhal, J. Conrad, and C. Vuillot,Towards scal- able bosonic quantum error correction , Quantum Sci. Technol. 5, 043001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    W. Cai, Y. Ma, W. Wang, C.-L. Zou, and L. Sun, Bosonic quantum error correction codes in supercon- ducting quantum circuits , Fundam. Res. 1, 50 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Joshi, K

    A. Joshi, K. Noh, and Y. Y. Gao, Quantum informa- tion processing with bosonic qubits in circuit QED , Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 033001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    W.-L. Ma, S. Puri, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and L. Jiang, Quantum control of bosonic modes with superconducting circuits , Sci. Bull. 66, 1789 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Dykman, in Fluctuating Nonlinear Oscillators: From Nanomechanics to Quantum Superconducting Circuits, edited by M

    M. Dykman, in Fluctuating Nonlinear Oscillators: From Nanomechanics to Quantum Superconducting Circuits, edited by M. Dykman (Oxford University Press, 2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Goto, Quantum computation based on quantum adiabatic bifurcations of Kerr-nonlinear parametric oscillators, J

    H. Goto, Quantum computation based on quantum adiabatic bifurcations of Kerr-nonlinear parametric oscillators, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 061015 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    Wustmann and V

    W. Wustmann and V. Shumeiko, Parametric effects in circuit quantum electrodynamics, Low Temp. Phys. 45, 848–869 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Iyama, T

    D. Iyama, T. Kamiya, S. Fujii, H. Mukai, Y. Zhou, T. Nagase, A. Tomonaga, R. Wang, J.-J. Xue, S. Watabe, S. Kwon, and J.-S. Tsai, Observation and manipulation of quantum interference in a supercon- ducting Kerr parametric oscillator, Nat. Commun.15, 86 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    Hoshi, T

    D. Hoshi, T. Nagase, S. Kwon, D. Iyama, T. Kamiya, S. Fujii, H. Mukai, S. Ahmed, A. F. Kockum, S. Watabe, F. Yoshihara and J.-S. Tsai, Entan- gling Schrödinger’s cat states by bridging discrete- and continuous-variable encoding, Nat. Commun. 16, 1309 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit, Nature 584, 205 (2020)

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    A. Hajr, B. Qing, K. Wang, G. Koolstra, Z. Pedram- razi, Z. Kang, L. Chen, L. B. Nguyen, C. Jünger, N. Goss, I. Huang, B. Bhandari, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, J. Dressel, A. N. Jordan, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, High-Coherence Kerr-Cat Qubit in 2D Architecture , Phys. Rev. X 14, 041049 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    B. Qing, A. Hajr, K. Wang, G. Koolstra, L. B. Nguyen, J. Hines, I. Huang, B. Bhandari, L. Chen, Z. Kang, C. Jünger, N. Goss, N. Jain, H. Kim, K.-H. Lee, A. Hashim, N. E. Frattini, Z. Pedramrazi, J. Dressel, A. N. Jordan, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi,Quantum Benchmarking of High-Fidelity Noise-Biased Opera- tions on a Detuned-Kerr-Cat Qubit , arXiv:2411.04442

    work page arXiv

  17. [17]

    N. E. Frattini, R. G. Cortiñas, J. Venkatraman, X. Xiao, Q. Su, C. U Lei, B. J. Chapman, V. R. Joshi, S. M. Girvin, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. Puri, and M. H. Devoret, Observation of Pairwise Level Degeneracies and the Quantum Regime of the Arrhenius Law in a Double-Well Parametric Oscillator , Phys. Rev. X 14, 031040 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Venkatraman, R

    J. Venkatraman, R. G. Cortiñas, N. E. Frattini, and M. H. Devoret, A driven Kerr oscillator with two-fold degeneracies for qubit protection , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 121, e2311241121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    A. Z. Ding, B. L. Brock, A. Eickbusch, A. Koottan- davida, N. E. Frattini, R. G. Cortiñas, V. R. Joshi, S. J. de Graaf, B. J. Chapman, S. Ganjam, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, and M. H. Devoret,Quantum control of an oscillator with a Kerr-cat qubit , Nat. Commun. 16, 5279 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    A. S. Darmawan, B. J. Brown, A. L. Grimsmo, D. K. Tuckett, and S. Puri, Practical Quantum Error Correction with the XZZX Code and Kerr-Cat Qubits , PRX Quantum 2, 030345 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    B. P. Lanyon, M. Barbieri, M. P. Almeida, T. Jen- newein, T. C. Ralph, K. J. Resch, G. J. Pryde, J. L. O’Brien, A. Gilchrist, and A. G. White, Simpli- fying quantum logic using higher-dimensional Hilbert spaces, Nature Phys. 5, 134 (2009)

    work page 2009

  22. [22]

    E. T. Campbell, Enhanced Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing in d-Level Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 230501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Qudits and High-Dimensional Quantum Computing , Front. Phys. 8, 589504 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    E. O. Kiktenko, A. S. Nikolaeva, and A. K. Fedorov, Colloquium: Qudits for decomposing multiqubit gates and realizing quantum algorithms , Rev. Mod. Phys. 97, 021003 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    M. S. Blok, V. V. Ramasesh, T. Schuster, K. O’Brien, J. M. Kreikebaum, D. Dahlen, A. Morvan, B. Yoshida, N. Y. Yao, and I. Siddiqi, Quantum Information Scrambling on a Superconducting Qutrit Processor , 13 Phys. Rev. X 11, 021010 (2021)

    work page 2021

  26. [26]

    Morvan, V

    A. Morvan, V. V. Ramasesh, M. S. Blok, J. M. Kreike- baum, K. O’Brien, L. Chen, B. K. Mitchell, R. K. Naik, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, Qutrit Random- ized Benchmarking , Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 210504 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Kononenko, M

    M. Kononenko, M. A. Yurtalan, S. Ren, J. Shi, S. Ashhab, and A. Lupascu, Characterization of control in a superconducting qutrit using randomized bench- marking, Phys. Rev. Research 3, L042007 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    N. Goss, A. Morvan, B. Marinelli, B. K. Mitchell, L. B. Nguyen, R. K. Naik, L. Chen, C. Jünger, J. M. Kreikebaum, D. I. Santiago, J. J. Wallman, and I. Siddiqi, High-fidelity qutrit entangling gates for super- conducting circuits, Nat. Commun. 13, 7481 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    K. Luo, W. Huang, Z. Tao, L. Zhang, Y. Zhou, J. Chu, W. Liu, B. Wang, J. Cui, S. Liu, F. Yan, M.-H. Yung, Y. Chen, T. Yan, and D. Yu,Experimental Re- alization of Two Qutrits Gate with Tunable Coupling in Superconducting Circuits , Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 030603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    T. Roy, Z. Li, E. Kapit, and D. I. Schuster, Two- Qutrit Quantum Algorithms on a Programmable Su- perconducting Processor , Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 064024 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    N. Goss, S. Ferracin, A. Hashim, A. Carignan-Dugas, J. M. Kreikebaum, R. K. Naik, D. I. Santiago, and I. Siddiqi, Extending the computational reach of a su- perconducting qutrit processor, npj Quantum Inf. 10, 101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Zhou, J.-W

    K. Zhou, J.-W. Xu, Q.-P. Su, Y. Zhang, X.-M. Yu, Z. Ma, H.-Y. Zhang1, H.-Y. Shi, W. Zheng, S. Pan, Y. Kang, Z. Huang, C.-P. Yang, S.-X. Li, and Y. Yu, Demonstration of Discrete-Time Quantum Walks and Observation of Topological Edge States in a Supercon- ducting Qutrit Chain , Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 250601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Z. Wang, R. W. Parker, E. Champion, and M. S. Blok, High-EJ /EC transmon qudits with up to 12 levels , Phys. Rev. Applied 23, 034046 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [34]

    Champion, Z

    E. Champion, Z. Wang, R. W. Parker, and M. S. Blok, Efficient Control of a Transmon Qudit Using Effective Spin-7/2 Rotations, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021096 (2025)

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    B. L. Brock, S. Singh, A. Eickbusch, V. V. Sivak, A. Z. Ding, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, and M. H. Devoret, Quantum error correction of qudits beyond break-even, Nature 641, 612 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Vlastakis, G

    B. Vlastakis, G. Kirchmair, Z. Leghtas, S. E. Nigg, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Deterministically Encoding Quantum Information Using 100-Photon Schrödinger Cat States, Science 342, 607–610 (2013)

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    X. L. He, Y. Lu, D. Q. Bao, H. Xue, W. B. Jiang, Z. Wang, A. F. Roudsari, P. Delsing, J. S. Tsai, and Z. R. Lin, Fast generation of Schrödinger cat states using a Kerr-tunable superconducting resonator , Nat. Commun. 14, 6358 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    S. L. Braunstein and R. I. McLachlan, Generalized squeezing, Phys. Rev. A 35, 1659 (1987)

    work page 1987

  39. [39]

    Banaszek and P

    K. Banaszek and P. L. Knight,Quantum interference in three-photon down-conversion , Phys. Rev. A 55, 2368 (1997)

    work page 1997

  40. [40]

    Felbinger, S

    T. Felbinger, S. Schiller, and J. Mlynek, Oscilla- tion and Generation of Nonclassical States in Three- Photon Down-Conversion , Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 492 (1998)

    work page 1998

  41. [41]

    Dell’Anno, S

    F. Dell’Anno, S. De Siena, and F. Illuminati, Multi- photon quantum optics and quantum state engineer- ing, Phys. Rep. 428, 53 (2006)

    work page 2006

  42. [42]

    C. W. S. Chang, C. Sabín, P. Forn-Díaz, F. Quijan- dría, A. M. Vadiraj, I. Nsanzineza, G. Johansson, and C. M. Wilson, Observation of Three-Photon Sponta- neous Parametric Down-Conversion in a Supercon- ducting Parametric Cavity , Phys. Rev. X 10, 011011 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [43]

    A. M. Eriksson, T. Sépulcre, M. Kervinen, T. Hill- mann, M. Kudra, S. Dupouy, Y. Lu, M. Khanah- madi, J. Yang, C. Castillo-Moreno, P. Delsing, and S. Gasparinetti, Universal control of a bosonic mode via drive-activated native cubic interactions , Nat. Com- mun. 15, 2512 (2024)

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Svensson, A

    I.-M. Svensson, A. Bengtsson, P. Krantz, J. Bylander, V. Shumeiko, and P. Delsing, Period-tripling subhar- monic oscillations in a driven superconducting res- onator, Phys. Rev. B 96, 174503 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Svensson, A

    I.-M. Svensson, A. Bengtsson, J. Bylander, V. Shumeiko, and P. Delsing, Period multiplication in a parametrically driven superconducting resonator , Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 022602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Zhang, J

    Y. Zhang, J. Gosner, S. M. Girvin, J. Ankerhold, and M. I. Dykman, Time-translation-symmetry breaking in a driven oscillator: From the quantum coherent to the incoherent regime , Phys. Rev. A 96, 052124 (2017)

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Zhang and M

    Y. Zhang and M. I. Dykman, Nonlocal random walk over Floquet states of a dissipative nonlinear oscilla- tor, Phys. Rev. E 100, 052148 (2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Tadokoro, H

    Y. Tadokoro, H. Tanaka, and M. I. Dykman, Noise- induced switching from a symmetry-protected shallow metastable state, Sci. Rep. 10, 10413 (2020)

    work page 2020

  49. [49]

    Gosner, B

    J. Gosner, B. Kubala, and J. Ankerhold, Relaxation dynamics and dissipative phase transition in quan- tum oscillators with period tripling , Phys. Rev. B101, 054501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Lang and A

    B. Lang and A. D. Armour, Multi-photon resonances in Josephson junction-cavity circuits , New J. Phys. 23, 033021 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Arndt and F

    L. Arndt and F. Hassler,Period Tripling due to Para- metric Down-Conversion in Circuit QED , Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 187701 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Minganti, V

    F. Minganti, V. Savona, and A. Biella, Dissipative phase transitions in n-photon driven quantum nonlin- ear resonators, Quantum 7, 1170 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Iachello, R

    F. Iachello, R. G. Cortiñas, F. Pérez-Bernal, and L. F. Santos, Symmetries of the squeeze-driven Kerr os- cillator, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56, 495305 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    Guo and V

    L. Guo and V. Peano, Engineering Arbitrary Hamil- tonians in Phase Space , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 023602 (2024). 14

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Labay-Mora, R

    A. Labay-Mora, R. Zambrini, and G. L. Giorgi,Quan- tum memories for squeezed and coherent superpo- sitions in a driven-dissipative nonlinear oscillator , Phys. Rev. A 109, 032407 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Yamaguchi, S

    A. Yamaguchi, S. Masuda, Y. Matsuzaki, T. Yamaji, T. Satoh, A. Morioka, Y. Kawakami, Y. Igarashi, M. Shirane, and T. Yamamoto, Spectroscopy of flux- driven Kerr parametric oscillators by reflection coeffi- cient measurement, New. J. Phys. 26, 043019 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    Lambert, E

    N. Lambert, E. Giguère, P. Menczel, B. Li, P. Hopf, G. Suárez, M. Gali, J. Lishman, R. Gadhvi, R. Agar- wal, A. Galicia, N. Shammah, P. Nation, J. R. Jo- hansson, S. Ahmed, S. Cross, A. Pitchford, and F. Nori, QuTiP 5: The Quantum Toolbox in Python , Phys. Rep. 1153, 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  58. [58]

    Royer, Wigner function as the expectation value of a parity operator , Phys

    A. Royer, Wigner function as the expectation value of a parity operator , Phys. Rev. A 15, 449 (1977)

    work page 1977

  59. [59]

    L. G. Lutterbach and L. Davidovich, Method for Di- rect Measurement of the Wigner Function in Cavity QED and Ion Traps, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 2547 (1997)

    work page 1997

  60. [60]

    Ahmed, C

    S. Ahmed, C. Sánchez Muñoz, F. Nori, and A. F. Kockum, Quantum State Tomography with Condi- tional Generative Adversarial Networks , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 140502 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Ahmed, C

    S. Ahmed, C. Sánchez Muñoz, F. Nori, and A. F. Kockum, Classification and reconstruction of optical quantum states with deep neural networks , Phys. Rev. Research 3, 033278 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    Z. Wang, M. Pechal, E. A. Wollack, P. Arrangoiz- Arriola, M. Gao, N. R. Lee, and A. H. Safavi-Naeini, Quantum dynamics of a few-photon parametric oscil- lator, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021049 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    S. Kwon, S. Watabe, and J.-S. Tsai, Autonomous quantum error correction in a four-photon Kerr para- metric oscillator , npj Quantum Inf. 8, 40 (2022)

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    M. A. P. Reynoso, E. M. Signor, J. Khalouf-Rivera, A. D. Ribeiro, F. Pérez-Bernal, and L. F. Santos, Phase transitions, symmetries, and tunneling in Kerr para- metric oscillators , Phys. Rev. A 112, 032415 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    Q. Su, R. G. Cortiñas, J. Venkatraman, and S. Puri, Unraveling the switching dynamics in a quan- tum double-well potential , Phys. Rev. A 112, 042202 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    X. You, J. A. Sauls, and J. Koch,Circuit quantization in the presence of time-dependent external flux , Phys. Rev. B 99, 174512 (2019)

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    Two Non-Commutative Binomial Theorems

    W. Wyss, Two Non-Commutative Binomial Theorems, Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.03861 (2017)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.03861 2017