Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Flash evaporation Riemann Problem: Formulation and its Exact Solution

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Flash evaporation, treated as a Riemann problem with instantaneous vapor-liquid equilibrium, has an exact solution with composite expansion shocks; Wood's sound-speed model systematically mis-predicts it.

desk verdict The FeRP idea and the Wood's-model critique are worth engaging, but the printed §3.3 Jacobian has sign errors that make the published exact-solver derivation internally inconsistent as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2601.18404 v1 pith:YMBJ5LFH submitted 2026-01-26 physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph

Haotong Bai , Ping Yi , Yixin Yang , Guoyan Zhao , Wenjia Xie , Mingbo Sun This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dynphysics.comp-ph
keywords FlashevaporationRiemannproblemVapor-liquidequilibriumHomogeneousmodelLandaufundamentalderivativeChapman-JouguetconditionWood'sspeedofsoundPeng-Robinsonequationstate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Flash evaporation — the violently fast liquid-to-vapor transition triggered by depressurization in engines and fuel injectors — has so far lacked a clean theoretical benchmark. This paper argues that, under the Homogeneous Equilibrium and Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium assumptions, flash evaporation can be formulated as a Riemann problem (two uniform states separated by a discontinuity) that admits an exact self-similar solution for arbitrary two-parameter equations of state. The solution reveals that crossing the saturation line splits rarefaction waves and, for high-heat-capacity fuels like n-dodecane, generates composite waves containing expansion shocks that satisfy the Chapman-Jouguet condition. It then shows that the widely used Wood's speed-of-sound model, despite capturing the qualitative trend, redefines the mixture entropy, produces a 'density lag', and significantly underestimates the intermediate pressure, velocity, and vaporization extent — a result with direct consequences for scramjet fuel-spray CFD.

What carries the argument

The central object is the FeRP formulation under HEM+VLE, together with the Landau fundamental derivative (a measure of isentrope convexity, whose sign and delta-function singularities classify wave structures). The key mechanism is the Chapman-Jouguet condition — the requirement that an expansion-shock speed equal the pre- or post-shock acoustic impedance — which pins down the states in the RS and RSR composite waves and is enforced as the outer constraint of a nested Newton iteration, with Rankine-Hugoniot and isentropic relations as inner constraints. For the model comparison, the central quantity is the difference between the complete equilibrium speed of sound c_eq and Wood's speed c_W,

What would settle it

A flash-evaporation shock-tube experiment on n-dodecane with a high-pressure liquid state expanding into low-pressure vapor: if the measured wave profile shows a smooth single rarefaction without the split-wave plateau at the saturation point, or without the predicted expansion-shock jump in velocity and pressure, the HEM/VLE assumption or the underlying thermodynamic derivative derivation would be contradicted. Alternatively, a direct measurement of two-phase sound speed that matches Wood's model rather than c_eq would falsify the claim that complete equilibrium is the correct physical limit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes an exact solution framework for the Flash evaporation Riemann Problem (FeRP) under the Homogeneous Equilibrium Model and Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium assumptions. It shows that when an isentropic expansion crosses the saturation line, the discontinuity in the equilibrium speed of sound splits rarefaction waves and creates a constant-state plateau in the x–t plane; for retrograde crossing (as with n-dodecane expanding into vapor), a negative delta-function singularity in the Landau fundamental derivative gives rise to non-classical RS and RSR composite waves containing expansion shocks that satisfy the Chapman-Jouguet condition. All thermodynamic derivatives are derived anal

Load-bearing premise

The solution assumes phase transition starts exactly on the saturation line and proceeds instantaneously to homogeneous equilibrium, neglecting metastable superheated-liquid states, nucleation barriers, and finite relaxation times; if these timescales are not negligible compared with the macroscopic flow, the Euler equations lose self-similarity and the exact FeRP solution is no longer the relevant physical limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Provides an exact benchmark for verifying CFD codes and approximate Riemann solvers for two-phase flashing flows, including scramjet fuel injection.
  • For n-dodecane, the expansion branch is classified into R, RS, or RSR waves depending on the intermediate pressure relative to characteristic saturation and Chapman-Jouguet pressures.
  • Wood's model is thermodynamically inconsistent within the HEM framework, producing a density lag, a non-physical entropy decrease, and systematic under-prediction of intermediate pressure, velocity, and vaporization extent.
  • The choice of sound-speed model changes wave structures and thermodynamic paths, not just numerical values; in the absence of experimental justification, the complete equilibrium model is recommended.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The strategy of using the Chapman-Jouguet condition as an outer constraint to avoid trivial convergence likely transfers to other non-classical wave problems, such as BZT fluids or two-phase compression waves, beyond flash evaporation.
  • The 'density lag' argument implies a simple diagnostic for any two-phase CFD scheme using Wood's speed of sound: monitoring entropy across phase boundaries should reveal the predicted non-physical entropy decrease.
  • The R/RS/RSR classification depends on the sign of the Landau-derivative singularity at the vapor saturation line, which may be sensitive to the equation of state; testing with a multiparameter EoS could identify fluids that switch between classical and non-classical behavior.
  • For low-heat-capacity fluids such as CO2 and CH4, the framework predicts only split rarefactions without expansion shocks, offering a directly testable distinction that existing shock-tube data could check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper formalizes the Flash evaporation Riemann Problem (FeRP) as a Riemann problem for the one-dimensional Euler equations in which the expansion branch crosses the saturation line, closed with the Homogeneous Equilibrium Model and Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium for a two-parameter equation of state (Peng–Robinson). It derives the required thermodynamic derivatives for single-phase and two-phase states, evaluates the Landau fundamental derivative, and identifies three expansion-wave topologies: simple rarefaction (R), rarefaction + upstream sonic expansion shock (RS), and rarefaction + double sonic expansion shock + rarefaction (RSR). Newton solvers are proposed for the intermediate state and for the Chapman–Jouguet-constrained non-classical waves, with a MATLAB implementation. The paper also develops an exact FeRP solution based on Wood's speed of sound and argues that Wood's model implicitly defines a mechanical mixture entropy, producing a "density lag" and a non-physical entropy decrease; benchmark n-dodecane injection cases show that Wood's model underestimates intermediate pressure, velocity, and vaporization relative to the complete equilibrium model.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a valuable contribution: it gives a complete, explicit thermodynamic-derivative apparatus for PR-EoS two-phase Riemann problems, a concrete construction of non-classical composite waves in the FeRP, a benchmark-quality exact solver, and a clear thermodynamic critique of a widely used sound-speed approximation. The provision of open-source MATLAB code and NIST-calibrated thermophysical parameters are significant reproducibility strengths. However, the central exactness claim depends on the correctness of the §3.3 Jacobian and on independent verification, both of which need attention before the benchmark status can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.3, Eqs. (59) and (62)] The Jacobian entries for the RSR/RS Newton solver contain sign errors in the D_b terms. From j^2=(P_a-P_b)/(v_b-v_a), with D=v_b-v_a and ∂v_b/∂P_a=-D_{b,Pa}/ρ_b^2, one obtains ∂j^2/∂P_a = 1/D + j^2 D_{b,Pa}/(D ρ_b^2) - j^2/(D ρ_a^2 c_a^2). In the notation of Eq. (59), v_a-v_b=-D, so the coefficient of D_{b,Pa} must be negative, not positive as printed. Similarly, ∂j^2/∂P_b = -1/D + j^2 D_{b,Pb}/(D ρ_b^2), so the coefficient in Eq. (62) must also be negative. A finite-difference check on an ideal-gas Hugoniot (γ=1.4, P_a=10, P_b=5) gives ∂j^2/∂P_a ≈ +0.77, whereas the printed Eq. (59) gives approximately -0.60. Since the Newton step (50) and the RS derivative (68) inherit these entries, the published iteration matrix is not the derivative of residuals (49) and (67). The authors must correct the signs, confirm whether the supplied MATLAB code uses the corrected signs, and rerun/report the
  2. [§4.3 and Appendix H] The paper claims an exact solution and proposes it as a CFD benchmark, but the solver is not verified by any independent check. No convergence residuals, no energy-conservation or Rankine–Hugoniot residuals, no grid-convergence study of the self-similar profiles, and no comparison with another exact solver or with a well-resolved numerical method are reported. Given that the FeRP solution involves non-classical composite waves and that the present review found sign errors in the governing Jacobian, an external verification step is load-bearing for the benchmark claim. I ask the authors to add a validation section quantifying solver residuals and comparing at least one case against an independent reference solution.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, final paragraph] The text introduces Shock–Compression Fan–Shock (SCS) waves but then says "we will not further discuss the cases involving SRS waves"; the acronym should be SCS, not SRS.
  2. [Figure 6 caption] The caption describes the figure as the phase diagram of "a low heat capacity fluid," but panel (a) is n-dodecane, which the text identifies as a high-heat-capacity fluid. Please reword the caption to cover both the retrograde and non-retrograde cases.
  3. [§2.5, Eq. (37)] For RSR waves, λ_tail is listed as u_{CJ,1}-c_{CJ,1}, which is the tail of the head rarefaction segment. Because the full RSR wave also contains a tail rarefaction, clarify that Eq. (37) refers to the tail of each individual rarefaction segment, not to the trailing edge of the entire RSR structure.
  4. [Notation, Eq. (13)] The symbols c_v and c_l are used for the saturated-phase speeds of sound while C_v is used for constant-volume specific heat. This is a potential source of confusion; consider denoting the saturated speeds of sound by c_sat,v and c_sat,l or similar.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the FeRP solution is derived in-paper; self-citations are implementation-level and non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. It starts from the Euler equations and a specified PR EoS whose coefficients are calibrated to external NIST data, writes out the needed thermodynamic derivatives in Appendices C–F, and constructs the wave curves directly from Rankine-Hugoniot conditions, Riemann invariants, the VLE/HEM assumptions, and the printed CJ equations in Section 3.2. The RSR/RS Newton schemes in Section 3.3–3.4 are derived from the residuals shown in the paper, not imported from prior work. The 'uniqueness' of the double sonic shock is presented as a consequence of the four written conditions C1–C4, not as an author-specific uniqueness theorem. The only self-citations, e.g. 'The algorithm for this iterative procedure can be found in Bai et al. [2025]' and the use of numerical integration from the same work, concern low-level inversion/integration routines; the paper itself supplies the Newton equations and a MATLAB program, so these citations are not load-bearing. The Wood's-model analysis is also not circular: the non-physical entropy decrease is explicitly flagged as a model inconsistency and is derived from the defined c_W path and Eqs. (74)–(76), not presented as a fitted or hidden prediction. No target quantity is fitted from data and then 'predicted.' Mandated limitations (HEM/VLE idealization, neglect of metastability, absence of experimental validation) are acknowledged in Sections 1 and 4 and are physical-modeling caveats, not circular steps. The alleged sign errors in Eqs. (59)/(62) are a possible internal correctness issue, but they do not make an output equal to an input by construction, so they fall outside circularity scoring.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central derivation is a closed-form thermodynamic construction; no target quantity is fitted. The numerical comparisons rest on literature/NIST-calibrated PR EoS and caloric coefficients for n-dodecane, and on the model assumptions listed.

free parameters (2)
  • n-dodecane PR EoS critical constants = Tc=658.1 K, Pc=1.82 MPa, omega=0.574
    Input parameters from Table 2 used in all numerical cases; calibrated to NIST/literature, not to the Riemann solution itself.
  • Caloric coefficients for energy/entropy (Guardone-Argrow model) = Cv_inf=2.970e3 J/(kg*K), n=0.613, e_ref=6.948e5 J/kg, s_ref=1.401e3 J/(kg*K)
    Appendix G states the coefficients are calibrated against NIST data; they set internal energy/entropy and therefore the speed of sound used in the Riemann solution.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption HEM: liquid and vapor share P, T=T_sat(P), and u; phase transition initiates strictly at the saturation line
    Section 1 and Figure 3b; this is the model that makes the FeRP well-posed.
  • domain assumption VLE fugacity equality defines the two-phase equilibrium path
    Appendix B; needed for continuous isentropes across the saturation envelope.
  • domain assumption Nucleation/relaxation timescales are negligible so Euler equations retain self-similarity
    Section 1, paragraph on flash flows; without this, the RP formulation is invalid.
  • domain assumption The right-state vapor remains in vapor phase during compression
    Section 2.3: 'we assume the low-pressure gas on the right side is sufficiently far from the saturation line...'
  • domain assumption Peng-Robinson EoS and the caloric model are accurate for n-dodecane over the relevant range
    Appendices A and G; the 'arbitrary EoS' claim is demonstrated only with PR EoS.
  • standard math Standard calculus, implicit function theorem, and Newton iteration convergence
    Used throughout the derivations; no formal convergence proof is given.
  • domain assumption Liu entropy condition governs admissibility of expansion shocks
    Section 1 states non-classical waves satisfy Liu's condition; if Liu admissibility is wrong, RS/RSR waves are not physical.
invented entities (1)
  • mechanical mixture entropy s_W
    purpose: Conceptual state function representing the entropy implicitly defined when Wood's c_W is used as the isentrope slope; used to expose thermodynamic inconsistency
    Introduced in Section 4.1; it is a bookkeeping construct with no separate observable prediction, and the paper itself argues it is not a true thermodynamic entropy.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Flash evaporation Riemann Problem: Formulation and its Exact Solution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YMBJ5LFH

@misc{pith2026260118404,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Flash evaporation Riemann Problem: Formulation and its Exact Solution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YMBJ5LFH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2601.18404}
}
read the original abstract

Flash evaporation, a liquid-to-gas phase transition phenomenon in real fluids, is prevalent in aerospace propulsion systems. To elucidate the physical mechanisms of such complex flows and provide theoretical benchmarks for Computational Fluid Dynamics simulations, this paper formalizes the Flash evaporation Riemann problem (FeRP) characterized by the expansion branch crossing the saturation line, within the framework of Homogeneous Equilibrium and Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium assumptions. An exact solution framework that analytically resolves all thermodynamic derivatives of equilibrium two-phase fluids is established for arbitrary two-parameter equations of state. By evaluating the Landau fundamental derivative, the non-classical wave structures arising in the FeRP are analyzed, for which a stable iterative solution strategy incorporating the Chapman-Jouguet condition as an outer constraint is proposed. Furthermore, an exact solution for the FeRP based on Wood's mechanical equilibrium speed of sound is developed, enabling a comprehensive evaluation of its thermodynamic implications. Results indicate that Wood's model alters the definition of the two-phase mixture entropy in the Euler equations, introducing an isentropic path characterized by a "density lag" effect and non-physical entropy decrease. Comparative analysis of the FeRP under typical scramjet fuel injection conditions reveals that, although Wood's model captures the general trend of the Riemann solution curve, it significantly underestimates intermediate pressure, velocity, and the extent of vaporization relative to the complete equilibrium model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.18404 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Flash evaporation in propulsion system applying it to transcritical nitrogen flows. In our previous work [Bai et al. , 2025], we derived a Newton iteration method for the classical RP of two-parameter fluids, grounded in fundamental thermodynamic principles. A classical solution implies that the wave structure consists solely of expansion rarefaction waves, compression shock waves, and contact discontinuities. In Be… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Thermodynamic Boundary and Phase Model of n-dodecane on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Three types of solution curves for the flash RP, using the n-dodecane phase diagram as an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: illustrates the Landau derivative Γ for n-dodecane calculated via the PR EoS. Specifically, Figure 5a depicts the distribution of Γ computed directly without incorporating the VLE model. The derivative Γ diverges to infinity at the isentropic spinodal line (c 2 = 0), w…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase diagram of a low heat capacity fluid. Isentropic lines cannot enter the Vapor region from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relationship between isentropic lines, Hugoniot curves, and Rayleigh lines in nonclassical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Isentropy paths of ceq and cW fact, if a value had to be assigned to sW , it would equal the initial entropy, simply because the path is defined as "isentropic".) However, after expanding from the two-phase region into the vapor phase region (downstream of point S3 in …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Exact solutions of the RP for Case 1, obtained with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Exact solutions of the RP for Case 2, obtained with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Exact solutions of the RP for Case 3, obtained with the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison of PR EoS results with NIST data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Oscillation-Free Real Fluid Quasi-Conservative Finite Volume Method for Transcritical and Phase-Change Flows

    physics.comp-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A quasi-conservative finite-volume scheme advects locally frozen thermodynamic coefficients and re-projects energy, suppressing pressure oscillations in transcritical and phase-change real-fluid flows while keeping en...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    oniglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G\

    Riemann, B. 1860 Ueber die Fortpflanzung ebener Luftwellen von endlicher Schwingungsweite. Abhandlungen der K\"oniglichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu G\"ottingen 8 , 43--66

  2. [2]

    Godunov, S. K. 1959 A finite difference method for numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics. Matematicheskii Sbornik 47 (89), 271--306

    1959

  3. [3]

    Toro, E. F. 2009 Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics , 3rd edn. Springer

    2009

  4. [4]

    Dafermos, C. M. 2016 Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics , 4th edn. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

    2016

  5. [5]

    & Habiballah, M

    Popp, M., Hulka, J., Yang, V. & Habiballah, M. 2004 Liquid Rocket Thrust Chambers: Aspects of Modeling, Analysis, and Design . Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 200. AIAA

    2004

  6. [6]

    Y., Yang, K., Zhang, J

    Li, F., Wang, T. Y., Yang, K., Zhang, J. C., Wang, H. B., Sun, M. B., Wang, Z. G. & Li, P. B. 2023a Effect of fuel temperature on mixing characteristics of a kerosene jet injected into a cavity-based supersonic combustor. Phys. Fluids 35 (4)

  7. [7]

    Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1980 Statistical Physics, Part 1 . Course of Theoretical Physics, vol. 5, 3rd edn. Pergamon

    1980

  8. [8]

    & Plohr, B

    Menikoff, R. & Plohr, B. J. 1989 The Riemann problem for fluid flow of real materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 , 75--130

    1989

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Lifshitz, E. M. & Pitaevskii, L. P. 1981 Physical Kinetics . Course of Theoretical Physics, vol. 10. Pergamon

    1981

  2. [10]

    B., Liu, X., Wang, H

    Li, F., Li, P. B., Liu, X., Wang, H. B., Sun, M. B., Wang, Z. G., Li, F., Zhang, J. C. & Yang, X. L. 2023b Numerical study on spray characteristics of liquid jets in supersonic crossflow. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 141 , 108543

  3. [11]

    & Le Martelot, S

    Caz\'e, J., Petitpas, F., Daniel, E., Queguineur, M. & Le Martelot, S. 2024 Modeling and simulation of the cavitation phenomenon in turbopumps. J. Comput. Phys. 502 , 112817

    2024

  4. [12]

    Brennen, C. E. 2005 Fundamentals of Multiphase Flow . Cambridge University Press

    2005

  5. [13]

    Z., Habchi, C

    Yi, P., Yang, S. Z., Habchi, C. & Lugo, R. 2019 A multicomponent real-fluid fully compressible four-equation model for two-phase flow with phase change. Phys. Fluids 31 (2), 026102

    2019

  6. [14]

    Z., Yi, P

    Yang, S. Z., Yi, P. & Habchi, C. 2020 Real-fluid injection modeling and LES simulation of the ECN Spray A injector using a fully compressible two-phase flow approach. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 122 , 103145

    2020

  7. [15]

    & Glaz, H

    Colella, P. & Glaz, H. M. 1985 Efficient solution algorithms for the Riemann problem for real gases. J. Comput. Phys. 59 , 264--289

    1985

  8. [16]

    & Loraud, J

    Saurel, R., Larini, M. & Loraud, J. C. 1994 Exact and approximate Riemann solvers for real gases. J. Comput. Phys. 112 , 126--137

    1994

  9. [17]

    & Quaranta, G

    Quartapelle, L., Castelletti, L., Guardone, A. & Quaranta, G. 2003 Solution of the Riemann problem of classical gasdynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 190 (1), 118--140

    2003

  10. [18]

    Kouremenos, D. A. 1986 The normal shock waves of real gases and the generalized isentropic exponents. Forsch. Ingenieurwes. 52 , 23--31

    1986

  11. [19]

    Wang, J. C. H. & Hickey, J.-P. 2020 Analytical solutions to shock and expansion waves for non-ideal equations of state. Phys. Fluids 32 (8), 086105

    2020

  12. [20]

    Wang, J. C. H. 2022 Riemann solvers with non-ideal thermodynamics: Exact, approximate, and machine learning solutions. PhD thesis, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

    2022

  13. [21]

    T., Yang, Y

    Bai, H. T., Yang, Y. X., Xie, W. J., Li, D. J. & Sun, M. B. 2025 Exact solutions for the transcritical Riemann problem of two-parameter fluids. Appl. Math. Mech. (Engl. Ed.) . https://doi.org/10.1007/s10483-025-3324-7

    2025 doi

  14. [22]

    Lambrakis, K. C. & Thompson, P. A. 1972 Existence of real fluids with a negative fundamental derivative . Phys. Fluids 15 (5), 933--935

    1972

  15. [23]

    Thompson, P. A. 1972 Compressible Fluid-Dynamics . McGraw-Hill

    1972

  16. [24]

    Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1959 Fluid Mechanics . Pergamon

    1959

  17. [25]

    Lax, P. D. 1973 Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws and the mathematical theory of shock waves. In Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws and the Mathematical Theory of Shock Waves . SIAM, pp. 1--48

    1973

  18. [26]

    1976 The entropy condition and the admissibility of shocks

    Liu, T.-P. 1976 The entropy condition and the admissibility of shocks. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 53 , 78--88

    1976

  19. [27]

    & Voss, A

    M\"uller, S. & Voss, A. 2006 The Riemann problem for the Euler equations with nonconvex and nonsmooth equation of state: Construction of wave curves. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 28 (2), 651--681

    2006

  20. [28]

    & Voss, A

    Dahmen, W., M\"uller, S. & Voss, A. 2005 Riemann problem for the Euler equation with non-convex equation of state including phase transitions. In Analysis and Numerics for Conservation Laws . Springer

    2005

  21. [29]

    2005 Exact Riemann solution for the Euler equations with nonconvex and nonsmooth equation of state

    Voss, A. 2005 Exact Riemann solution for the Euler equations with nonconvex and nonsmooth equation of state. PhD thesis, RWTH Aachen University

    2005

  22. [30]

    & Le M\'etayer, O

    Saurel, R., Boivin, P. & Le M\'etayer, O. 2016 A general formulation for cavitating, boiling and evaporating flows. Comput. Fluids 128 , 53--64

    2016

  23. [31]

    & Abgrall, R

    Saurel, R., Petitpas, F. & Abgrall, R. 2008 Modelling phase transition in metastable liquids: Application to cavitating and flashing flows. J. Fluid Mech. 607 , 313--350

    2008

  24. [32]

    & Saurel, R

    Le M\'etayer, O. & Saurel, R. 2016 The Noble-Abel Stiffened-Gas equation of state. Phys. Fluids 28 (4), 046102

    2016

  25. [33]

    & Warnecke, G

    Dreyer, W., Hantke, M. & Warnecke, G. 2013 Exact solutions to the Riemann problem for compressible isothermal Euler equations for two-phase flows with and without phase transition. Q. Appl. Math. 71 (3), 509--540

    2013

  26. [34]

    & Robinson, D

    Peng, D. & Robinson, D. 1976 A new two-constant equation of state. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 15 (1), 59--64

    1976

  27. [35]

    & Kwong, J

    Redlich, O. & Kwong, J. 1949 On the thermodynamics of solutions; An equation of state; Fugacities of gaseous solutions. Chem. Rev. 44 (1), 233--237

    1949

  28. [36]

    Wood, A. B. 1946 Textbook of Sound . G Bell and Sons, Ltd

    1946

  29. [37]

    Yellott, J. I., Jr. 1934 Supersaturated steam available to purchase. Trans. ASME 56 (5), 411--427

    1934

  30. [38]

    Sedov, L. I. 1973 Mechanics of a Continuous Medium . Nauka

    1973

  31. [39]

    & Argrow, B

    Guardone, A. & Argrow, B. M. 2005 Nonclassical gasdynamic region of selected fluorocarbons. Phys. Fluids 17 , 116102

    2005

  32. [40]

    http://webbook.nist.gov

    NIST 2023 NIST Chemistry WebBook. http://webbook.nist.gov

    2023

  33. [41]

    1996 How to prevent pressure oscillations in multicomponent flow calculations: A quasi conservative approach

    Abgrall, R. 1996 How to prevent pressure oscillations in multicomponent flow calculations: A quasi conservative approach. J. Comput. Phys. 125 (1), 150--160

    1996

  34. [42]

    C., Lv, Y

    Ma, P. C., Lv, Y. & Ihme, M. 2017 An entropy-stable hybrid scheme for simulations of transcritical real-fluid flows. J. Comput. Phys. 340 , 330--357

    2017

  35. [43]

    Y., Srinivasan, N

    Zhang, H. Y., Srinivasan, N. & Yang, S. 2024 In situ adaptive tabulation of vapor-liquid equilibrium solutions for multi-component high-pressure transcritical flows with phase change. J. Comput. Phys. 500 , 112752

    2024

  36. [44]

    & Ghidaglia, J

    Benjelloun, S. & Ghidaglia, J. M. 2021 On the sound speed in two-fluid mixtures and the implications for CFD model validation. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 90 , 152--168

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.