pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.18618 · v2 · pith:K7CLQN6Znew · submitted 2026-01-26 · 🌀 gr-qc

Quantum gravitational stellar evolution beyond shell-crossing singularities

Micha{\l} Bobula , Francesco Fazzini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 14:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords stellar collapseshell-crossing singularitiesthin dust shellDarmois-Israel junction conditionsinter-universal wormholeHamiltonian formulationeffective gravitywormhole formation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Treating shell-crossing singularities as thin dust shells extends stellar collapse to inter-universal wormholes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Models of effective stellar collapse predict a bounce when energy density reaches the Planck scale, often followed by shell-crossing singularities that end the spacetime description. This work extends the geometry beyond those singularities by modeling them as non-isolated thin dust shells and using a Hamiltonian version of the Darmois-Israel junction conditions to match the spacetimes. The construction keeps the shell on a timelike trajectory for any initial mass and preserves continuity of the induced metric. Consequently the collapse evolves into an inter-universal wormhole comparable to the classical Oppenheimer-Snyder dust collapse. Readers interested in singularity resolution would find value in this general method for continuing the evolution in any such effective theory.

Core claim

The central claim is that the Hamiltonian formulation of the Darmois-Israel junction conditions can be applied to shell-crossing singularities by treating them as non-isolated thin dust shells, thereby extending the spacetime such that the shell motion remains timelike throughout and the induced metric is continuous, ultimately producing an inter-universal wormhole analogous to the Oppenheimer-Snyder scenario. This framework applies broadly to effective theories of stellar collapse that exhibit shell-crossing singularities.

What carries the argument

Hamiltonian formulation of the Darmois-Israel junction conditions for a thin dust shell; it matches the interior collapsing region to the exterior and ensures the required continuity and causal properties by construction.

If this is right

  • The resulting stellar evolution produces an inter-universal wormhole analogous to the Oppenheimer-Snyder scenario.
  • The shell's motion remains timelike throughout the entire evolution, independent of the initial stellar mass.
  • The induced metric on the shell remains continuous.
  • This method supplies a general framework for any effective theory of stellar collapse with shell-crossing singularities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the construction holds, it suggests that effects in collapse can lead to connections between different universes rather than isolated black holes.
  • Similar junction techniques might be adapted to handle other singularity types arising in gravitational dynamics.
  • The approach could be implemented in numerical simulations to explore the full post-bounce dynamics of stars.

Load-bearing premise

The shell-crossing singularity admits a consistent description as a non-isolated thin dust shell to which the Hamiltonian Darmois-Israel junction conditions apply directly.

What would settle it

A calculation within a concrete collapse model that results in a spacelike shell trajectory or a discontinuous induced metric when applying these junction conditions would demonstrate that the proposed extension does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.18618 by Francesco Fazzini, Micha{\l} Bobula.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic plots illustrating two dynamical extensions of LTB solutions beyond shell-crossing singularities (left and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The Darmois-Israel junction conditions, which gen￾erally allow for the study of the evolution of a space￾time where different solutions of the field equations are matched at a common boundary, are typically applied in simplified contexts, such as the Oppenheimer-Snyder model or the isolated thin-shell case [15]. Regarding the effective model under consideration, several works have explored both directions … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Numerical results for the non-isolated thin shell as a future of a shell crossing singularity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Models of effective stellar collapse inspired by loop quantum gravity predict a bounce when the stellar energy density reaches the Planck scale, typically followed by the formation of shell-crossing singularities. This work aims to extend the spacetime beyond these singularities by employing a Hamiltonian formulation of the Darmois-Israel junction conditions, treating the singularity as a non-isolated thin dust shell. By construction, the shell's motion remains timelike throughout the entire evolution, regardless of the amount of initial stellar mass, and the induced metric on the shell remains continuous. The resulting stellar evolution produces an inter-universal wormhole, analogous to the simpler Oppenheimer-Snyder scenario. The proposed approach provides a general framework for any effective (or classical) theory of stellar collapse characterized by shell-crossing singularities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes extending effective loop quantum gravity-inspired models of stellar collapse beyond shell-crossing singularities. It models the post-bounce singularity as a non-isolated thin dust shell and applies a Hamiltonian formulation of the Darmois-Israel junction conditions. By this construction, the shell motion remains timelike for any initial mass, the induced metric stays continuous, and the evolution produces an inter-universal wormhole analogous to the Oppenheimer-Snyder case. The approach is presented as a general framework applicable to any effective stellar collapse theory featuring such singularities.

Significance. If the thin-shell idealization and junction conditions can be shown to be consistent with the underlying effective LQG dynamics (modified Friedmann or TOV equations), the result would supply a concrete mechanism for continuing spacetime evolution past caustics while preserving timelike character and yielding wormhole topologies. This would strengthen the case for bounce scenarios in quantum gravitational collapse and provide a template for handling singularities in related models. The work explicitly builds on standard junction techniques rather than introducing new free parameters.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and construction section] The central claim that the Hamiltonian Darmois-Israel construction applied to the non-isolated thin dust shell guarantees timelike motion and metric continuity by design (abstract) rests on the assumption that this idealization satisfies the effective field equations across the junction. No derivation is supplied showing that the modified Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff or Friedmann equations of the LQG-inspired model hold without extra surface stress-energy terms or violation of 4-velocity continuity; if the integrated mass or bounce condition is altered, the wormhole topology and timelike guarantee do not follow from the parent theory.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from an explicit statement of the effective equations (e.g., the modified Friedmann equation) used in the parent LQG model before the junction is imposed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive criticism. The concern about consistency between the thin-shell idealization and the underlying effective LQG dynamics is well taken. We address it directly below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and construction section] The central claim that the Hamiltonian Darmois-Israel construction applied to the non-isolated thin dust shell guarantees timelike motion and metric continuity by design (abstract) rests on the assumption that this idealization satisfies the effective field equations across the junction. No derivation is supplied showing that the modified Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff or Friedmann equations of the LQG-inspired model hold without extra surface stress-energy terms or violation of 4-velocity continuity; if the integrated mass or bounce condition is altered, the wormhole topology and timelike guarantee do not follow from the parent theory.

    Authors: The Hamiltonian formulation of the Darmois-Israel conditions is a purely geometric matching procedure that enforces continuity of the induced metric and the timelike character of the shell world-tube by construction, once the shell is identified with the caustic. The effective LQG dynamics (modified Friedmann or TOV) are imposed only in the bulk regions on either side of the shell; the shell itself carries an explicit dust surface stress-energy that is already part of the junction data. Because the matching is performed after the bounce, the integrated mass and the bounce density threshold remain those of the parent effective solution. We agree, however, that an explicit integration of the effective equations across the junction to confirm the absence of spurious surface terms would strengthen the presentation. We will add a short derivation in the construction section showing that the jump in the extrinsic curvature is sourced solely by the dust surface density, with no additional contributions to the integrated mass or bounce condition. This will make clear that the inter-universal wormhole topology follows directly from the parent effective theory. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Timelike motion and metric continuity asserted by construction from thin-shell modeling choice

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "By construction, the shell's motion remains timelike throughout the entire evolution, regardless of the amount of initial stellar mass, and the induced metric on the shell remains continuous."

    The paper adopts the thin-shell idealization with Darmois-Israel conditions as the method to extend beyond the singularity. The timelike character and metric continuity are then declared to hold by construction of this idealization, so the wormhole topology and continuous evolution follow directly from the modeling premise rather than being independently derived from the effective LQG bounce equations or shown to preserve the original 4-velocity continuity.

full rationale

The paper's central result—an inter-universal wormhole with guaranteed timelike shell motion—is obtained by modeling the shell-crossing singularity as a thin dust shell and applying Darmois-Israel junction conditions in Hamiltonian form. This modeling directly enforces the claimed properties, as stated in the abstract. No parameter fitting, self-citation chain, or renaming of known results is present, and the approach remains self-contained against external benchmarks for the junction formalism itself. The circularity is therefore limited to the definitional enforcement of the key dynamical outcome rather than a full reduction of the entire derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the Hamiltonian Darmois-Israel conditions to the modeled singularity and the assumption that the thin-shell construction preserves timelike motion and metric continuity.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Darmois-Israel junction conditions admit a Hamiltonian formulation that can be applied to non-isolated thin dust shells at shell-crossing singularities
    Invoked to extend the spacetime while keeping the shell timelike.
invented entities (1)
  • non-isolated thin dust shell representing the shell-crossing singularity no independent evidence
    purpose: To allow continuation of the spacetime evolution past the singularity
    Postulated to model the crossing point and enforce timelike motion by construction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5649 in / 1271 out tokens · 43405 ms · 2026-05-21T14:24:38.721128+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fuzzy-novae

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A phenomenological loop-quantum-gravity-inspired model resolves black hole singularities by creating a dynamical anti-trapped region that ejects all stellar mass as a stable outgoing solitary wave.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gravitational collapse and space-time sin- gularities,

    R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse and space-time sin- gularities,” Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 57 (1965)

    work page 1965

  2. [2]

    On the nature of singularities in general relativity

    F. J. Tipler, “On the nature of singularities in general relativity”, Phys. Rev. D15, 942 (1977)

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    Nature of singularities in gravitational col- lapse

    A. Kr´ olak, “Nature of singularities in gravitational col- lapse”, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, Vol. 136, pp. 45–56 (1999)

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    Shell crossings and the Tolman model,

    C. Hellaby and K. Lake, “Shell crossings and the Tolman model,” Astrophys. J.290, 381 (1985)

    work page 1985

  5. [5]

    What is a shell crossing singu- larity?,

    P. Szekeres and A. Lun, “What is a shell crossing singu- larity?,” J. Austral. Math. Soc. B41167–179 (1999)

    work page 1999

  6. [6]

    Dynamical extensions for shell-crossing singularities

    B. C. Nolan, “Dynamical extensions for shell-crossing singularities,” Class. Quantum Grav.20575 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0301028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  7. [7]

    On the occurrence of naked singularities in general relativity

    M¨ uller zum Hagen, H. and Seifert, H.-J. and Yodzis, P., “On the occurrence of naked singularities in general relativity”. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 34(2):135–148 (1973)

    work page 1973

  8. [8]

    Strengths of singularities in spherical symmetry

    B. C. Nolan, “Strengths of singularities in spher- ical symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D60, 024014 (1999) arXiv:gr-qc/9902021

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  9. [9]

    Numerical methods for conservation laws (2. ed.)

    R. J. LeVeque, “Numerical methods for conservation laws (2. ed.)”, Birkh¨ auser, Lectures in mathematics, 1992, pp. 1–214, ISBN: 978-3-7643-2723-1

    work page 1992

  10. [10]

    Implosion-explosion in supernovae,

    P.-H. Chavanis, B. Denet, M. Le Berre, and Y. Pomeau, “Implosion-explosion in supernovae,” EPL12930003 (2020),arXiv:1909.05101

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    On Dispersive and Classical Shock Waves in Bose-Einstein Condensates and Gas Dynamics

    M. A. Hoefer, M. J. Ablowitz, I. Coddington, E. A. Cornell, P. Engels, and V. Schweikhard, “Dispersive and classical shock waves in Bose-Einstein condensates and gas dynamics”, Phys. Rev. A74, 023623 (2006), arXiv:cond-mat/0603389

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  12. [12]

    Weak solutions in Ein- stein theory and beyond

    Fazzini, F. and Mehmood, H., “Weak solutions in Ein- stein theory and beyond”, Phys. Rev. D,112, 064064 (2025),arXiv:2505.01846

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [14]

    Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in gen- eral relativity

    W. Israel, “Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in gen- eral relativity”, Nuovo Cimento B44, 1–14 (1966)

    work page 1966

  14. [15]

    A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics

    Poisson, E., “A Relativist’s Toolkit: The Mathematics of Black-Hole Mechanics”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2004)

    work page 2004

  15. [16]

    Expansion of a Thin Shell around a Void in Expanding Universe

    Maeda, K. and Sato, H., “Expansion of a Thin Shell around a Void in Expanding Universe”, Progress of The- oretical Physics, 70(3):772–782 (1983)

    work page 1983

  16. [17]

    Expanding Shell around a Void and Universe Model

    Sakai, N., Maeda, K., and Sato, H., “Expanding Shell around a Void and Universe Model”, Progress of Theo- retical Physics, 89(6):1193–1201 (1993)

    work page 1993

  17. [18]

    Peculiar velocities of nonlinear structure: Voids in McVittie space-time

    Sakai, N. and Haines, P., “Peculiar velocities of nonlinear structure: Voids in McVittie space-time”, Astrophys. J., 536:515 (2000). 16

    work page 2000

  18. [19]

    Quantum gravity,

    C. Rovelli, “Quantum gravity,”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2004)

    work page 2004

  19. [20]

    Ashtekar and E

    A. Ashtekar and E. Bianchi, “A Short Review of Loop Quantum Gravity,” Rept. Prog. Phys.84, 042001 (2021), arXiv:2104.04394

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [21]

    Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity,

    T. Thiemann, “Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2007)

    work page 2007

  21. [22]

    Black hole collapse and bounce in effective loop quan- tum gravity,

    J. G. Kelly, R. Santacruz, and E. Wilson-Ewing, “Black hole collapse and bounce in effective loop quan- tum gravity,” Class. Quant. Grav.3804LT01 (2021), arXiv:2006.09325

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [23]

    Nonsingular col- lapse of a spherical dust cloud

    A. Alonso-Bardaji, and D. Brizuela, “Nonsingular col- lapse of a spherical dust cloud”, Phys. Rev. D109, 064023 (2024),arXiv:2312.15505

    work page arXiv 2024

  23. [24]

    Covari- ant Lemaˆ ıtre-Tolman-Bondi collapse in models of loop quantum gravity

    Bojowald, M., Duque, E. I., and Hartmann, D., “Covari- ant Lemaˆ ıtre-Tolman-Bondi collapse in models of loop quantum gravity”, Phys. Rev. D,111, 064002 (2025), arXiv:2412.18054

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [25]

    Fate of quantum black holes

    V. Husain, J. G. Kelly, R. Santacruz, and E. Wilson- Ewing, “Fate of quantum black holes”, Phys. Rev. D106, 024014 (2022).arXiv:2203.04238

    work page arXiv 2022

  25. [26]

    Husain, J

    V. Husain, J. G. Kelly, R. Santacruz, and E. Wilson- Ewing, “Quantum Gravity of Dust Collapse: Shock Waves from Black Holes”, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 121301 (2022),arXiv:2109.08667

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [27]

    General- ized analysis of a dust collapse in effective loop quantum gravity: fate of shocks and covariance

    K. Giesel, H. Liu, P. Singh, and S. A. Weigl, “General- ized analysis of a dust collapse in effective loop quantum gravity: fate of shocks and covariance”, Phys. Rev. D 110, 104016 (2024),arXiv:2308.10953

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [28]

    Shell- crossings and shock formation during gravitational col- lapse in effective loop quantum gravity

    F. Fazzini, V. Husain, and E. Wilson-Ewing, “Shell- crossings and shock formation during gravitational col- lapse in effective loop quantum gravity”, Phys. Rev. D 109, 084052 (2024),arXiv:2312.02032

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [29]

    Gravita- tional collapse in effective loop quantum gravity: Beyond marginally bound configurations

    L. Cipriani, F. Fazzini, and E. Wilson-Ewing, “Gravita- tional collapse in effective loop quantum gravity: Beyond marginally bound configurations”, Phys. Rev. D110, 066004 (2024),arXiv:2404.04192

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [30]

    Stellar collapse with pressure in effective loop quantum gravity,

    L. Cafaro, L. Cipriani, F. Fazzini, and F. Soltani, “Stellar collapse with pressure in effective loop quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D111, 124006 (2025),arXiv:2412.17678

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [31]

    Causal structure of nonhomogeneous dust collapse in effective loop quan- tum gravity

    M. Bobula and T. Paw lowski, “Causal structure of nonhomogeneous dust collapse in effective loop quan- tum gravity”, Phys. Rev. D112, 064056 (2025), arXiv:2410.22943

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [32]

    Quantum induced shock dynamics in gravitational collapse: insights from effective models and numerical frameworks

    H. Liu and D. Qu, “Quantum induced shock dynamics in gravitational collapse: insights from effective models and numerical frameworks”,arXiv:2504.18462(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [33]

    Dust shell in effective loop quantum black hole model

    H. Sahlmann and C. Zhang, “Dust shell in effective loop quantum black hole model”, Phys. Rev. D112, 084079 (2025).arXiv:2506.04589

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [34]

    Effec- tive loop quantum gravity framework for vacuum spher- ically symmetric spacetimes,

    J. G. Kelly, R. Santacruz, and E. Wilson-Ewing, “Effec- tive loop quantum gravity framework for vacuum spher- ically symmetric spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D102, 106024 (2020),arXiv:2006.09302

    work page arXiv 2020

  34. [35]

    Lewandowski, Y

    J. Lewandowski, Y. Ma, J. Yang, and C. Zhang, “Quan- tum Oppenheimer-Snyder and Swiss Cheese Models,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 101501 (2023),arXiv:2210.02253

    work page arXiv 2023

  35. [36]

    Rainbow Oppenheimer– Snyder collapse and the entanglement entropy pro- duction,

    M. Bobula and T. Paw lowski, “Rainbow Oppenheimer– Snyder collapse and the entanglement entropy pro- duction,” Phys. Rev. D108, 026016 (2023), arXiv:2303.12708

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [37]

    Painlev´ e- Gullstrand coordinates discontinuity in the quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder model,

    F. Fazzini, C. Rovelli, and F. Soltani, “Painlev´ e- Gullstrand coordinates discontinuity in the quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder model,” Phys. Rev. D108, 044009 (2023),arXiv:2307.07797

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [38]

    Effective LQG-inspired dynamics of a thin shell and the fate of a collapsing star

    F. Fazzini, “Effective LQG-inspired dynamics of a thin shell and the fate of a collapsing star”,arXiv:2509.04945 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [39]

    Quantum dust collapse with cosmological constant and methods for constructing conformal diagrams,

    M. Bobula and T. Paw lowski, “Quantum dust collapse with cosmological constant and methods for constructing conformal diagrams,” Phys. Rev. D112, 026005 (2025), arXiv:2410.22605

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [40]

    Gentle spaghettification in effective LQG dust collapse

    F. Fazzini, “Gentle spaghettification in effective LQG dust collapse”, Phys. Rev. D112, 026029 (2025), arXiv:2502.20187

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [41]

    Quantum Nature of the Big Bang: Improved dynamics

    A. Ashtekar, T. Paw lowski, and P. Singh, “Quantum Na- ture of the Big Bang: Improved dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D74084003 (2006),arXiv:gr-qc/0607039

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  41. [42]

    Shock waves in classi- cal dust collapse

    V. Husain and H. Mehmood, “Shock waves in classi- cal dust collapse”, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033215 (2025), arXiv:2504.14883

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [43]

    Hamiltonian Treatment of the Gravitational Collapse of Thin Shells

    J. Crisostomo and R. Olea, “Hamiltonian treatment of the gravitational collapse of thin shells”, Phys. Rev. D 69, 104023 (2003),arXiv:hep-th/0311054

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  43. [44]

    Non-uniqueness of shockwave evolution in a loop quantum gravity inspired model

    F. Fazzini, “Non-uniqueness of shockwave evolution in a loop quantum gravity inspired model”, Phys. Scripta 100, 115220 (2025),arXiv:2502.03003

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [45]

    The instability of the inner horizon of the quantum- corrected black hole

    L.-M. Cao, L.-Y. Li, L.-B. Wu, and Y.-S. Zhou, “The instability of the inner horizon of the quantum- corrected black hole”, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 507 (2024), arXiv:2308.10746

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [46]

    D. M. Eardley,Death of White Holes in the Early Uni- verse, Phys. Rev. Lett.33, 442–444 (1974)

    work page 1974

  46. [47]

    Planck stars, White Holes, Remnants and Planck-mass quasi-particles. The quan- tum gravity phase in black holes’ evolution and its man- ifestations

    C. Rovelli and F. Vidotto, “Planck stars, White Holes, Remnants and Planck-mass quasi-particles. The quan- tum gravity phase in black holes’ evolution and its man- ifestations”,arXiv:2407.09584(2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  47. [48]

    Geometry of the black-to-white hole transition within a single asymp- totic region

    M. Han, C. Rovelli e F. Soltani, “Geometry of the black-to-white hole transition within a single asymp- totic region”, Phys. Rev. D107, 064011 (2023). arXiv:2302.03872

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [49]

    Black Holes Have More States than Those Defined by the Bekenstein–Hawking Entropy: A Simple Argument,

    C. Rovelli, “Black Holes Have More States than Those Defined by the Bekenstein–Hawking Entropy: A Simple Argument,”Universe11(1), 6 (2025). arXiv:1710.00218

    work page arXiv 2025