pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.21091 · v2 · pith:X7OBCHDBnew · submitted 2026-01-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Extraction of a structural short-range order descriptor from nanobeam electron diffraction patterns using a transfer learning approach

Junjie Wu , Timothy J. Rupert This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 14:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nanobeam electron diffractionstructural short-range ordertransfer learningamorphous solidsmetallic glassesdisorder parameterCu-Zr alloysmachine learning
0
0 comments X

The pith

A transfer learning model extracts a quantitative disorder parameter from nanobeam electron diffraction patterns of amorphous solids.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a ResNet-18 neural network trained on simulated diffraction patterns can map experimental nanobeam electron diffraction data to a continuous structural disorder parameter in metallic glasses and amorphous grain boundaries. This parameter comes from hybrid molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations of Cu-Zr alloys and outperforms traditional Voronoi indices as a training target. The approach turns a previously qualitative characterization technique into a quantitative one that tracks local structural variations across different interaction volumes. If successful, it would allow direct experimental measurement of short-range order and its links to mechanical behavior in amorphous materials.

Core claim

The central discovery is that transfer learning with a ResNet-18 model trained on simulated nanobeam diffraction patterns from hybrid MD/MC Cu-Zr structures yields low validation mean absolute error when predicting the disorder parameter, and the same model applied to both additional simulated patterns and real experimental patterns reliably reproduces spatial variations in local structural state.

What carries the argument

ResNet-18 convolutional neural network trained via transfer learning to regress the disorder parameter from simulated nanobeam diffraction patterns generated at different locations in metallic glass and amorphous grain boundary models.

If this is right

  • Quantitative maps of short-range order become available from routine nanobeam scans of amorphous samples.
  • Structure-property studies can directly correlate measured local disorder with measured mechanical response at the same locations.
  • The same trained model can be tested on other amorphous alloy systems without retraining from scratch.
  • Grain boundary complexions in polycrystalline materials can be characterized for their structural state using the same pipeline.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be retrained on diffraction patterns from other characterization geometries such as selected-area or microdiffraction to broaden its range of length scales.
  • If the disorder parameter correlates with properties across many systems, it might serve as a general order parameter for machine-learning potentials of amorphous solids.
  • Integration with in-situ mechanical testing inside the microscope would enable direct observation of how local structural state evolves during deformation.

Load-bearing premise

The disorder parameter computed from the hybrid simulations accurately labels the structural feature that produces the observed diffraction patterns in both simulation and real experiments.

What would settle it

Apply the trained model to experimental nanobeam patterns from a Cu-Zr sample whose independent local structural state has been measured by another technique such as fluctuation electron microscopy; a large systematic mismatch between predicted and measured disorder values would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

Amorphous solids exhibit structural short-range order despite lacking long-range crystalline order, with this structural descriptor found to be important for determining mechanical properties. Nanobeam electron diffraction offers a potential route for experimental characterization of structural short-range order, yet efforts to date have been primarily qualitative in nature. In this work, machine learning approaches based on transfer learning are used to enable quantitative analysis of nanobeam electron diffraction data from amorphous solids. A ResNet-18 model is trained on simulated diffraction patterns taken from different locations within simulated metallic glasses and amorphous grain boundary complexions in the Cu-Zr alloy system that were created with hybrid molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo simulations. The disorder parameter is found to be a superior target structural descriptor compared to traditional Voronoi indices for this task. The model achieves a low validation mean absolute error across diffraction patterns corresponding to different interaction volumes, demonstrating excellent performance and potential transferability. Testing was performed using other simulated nanobeam electron diffraction data as well as experimental nanobeam electron diffraction patterns, showing that the model can reliably capture spatial variations in local structural state. As a whole, this framework is able to overcome the challenges in the quantitative experimental characterization of structural short-range order, enabling improved characterization of amorphous solids and the exploration of structure-property relationships.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a transfer learning framework based on a fine-tuned ResNet-18 network to extract a quantitative structural short-range order descriptor from nanobeam electron diffraction (NBED) patterns in amorphous Cu-Zr metallic glasses and grain-boundary complexions. Simulated NBED patterns are generated from hybrid MD/MC atomistic models; a disorder parameter derived from these models is used as the regression target and shown to outperform Voronoi indices. The network achieves low validation MAE across patterns with varying interaction volumes, and is tested on additional simulated data as well as experimental NBED maps, where it is reported to capture spatial variations in local structural state.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the work offers a concrete route toward quantitative, spatially resolved characterization of short-range order in amorphous solids via NBED, which could strengthen structure–property correlations in metallic glasses. The explicit comparison of the disorder parameter against Voronoi indices and the systematic variation of interaction volumes in the simulated training set are positive features. The primary limitation is that experimental validation remains qualitative; stronger quantitative anchoring against independent experimental or atomistic metrics would substantially increase the impact.

major comments (3)
  1. [Experimental results] Experimental results section: the statement that the model 'reliably capture[s] spatial variations in local structural state' on experimental NBED patterns is supported only by visual inspection of maps; no quantitative correlation with an independent experimental observable (e.g., local coordination numbers from complementary spectroscopy or fitted atomistic models) is provided. This leaves the transferability claim under-supported.
  2. [Methods] Methods / training details: the manuscript reports low validation MAE but does not specify the train/validation split ratios, whether the splits were performed at the pattern or simulation-cell level, or how variations in interaction volume were controlled during training. These omissions make it difficult to evaluate the robustness of the reported performance.
  3. [Target label definition] Choice of target label: the disorder parameter is extracted from the same class of hybrid MD/MC simulations that generate the training diffraction patterns. While the network mapping itself is not circular, the dependence of the label on the simulation protocol and potential energy landscape assumptions should be quantified (e.g., by testing sensitivity to different interatomic potentials).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions for the experimental maps should explicitly state the field-of-view size, probe step size, and any post-processing (e.g., normalization or background subtraction) applied to the raw NBED patterns.
  2. [Abstract and Methods] The abstract and main text use the phrase 'different interaction volumes' without defining the range of thicknesses or convergence angles explored; a short table or plot summarizing these parameters would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their detailed and constructive review of our manuscript. Their comments have prompted us to clarify several aspects of our methodology and to better contextualize the experimental results. Below, we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments. We have revised the manuscript accordingly to address the raised issues.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Experimental results section: the statement that the model 'reliably capture[s] spatial variations in local structural state' on experimental NBED patterns is supported only by visual inspection of maps; no quantitative correlation with an independent experimental observable (e.g., local coordination numbers from complementary spectroscopy or fitted atomistic models) is provided. This leaves the transferability claim under-supported.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the experimental validation is primarily qualitative, relying on visual inspection of the predicted disorder maps. Quantitative correlation with independent experimental observables is indeed difficult to establish directly, as complementary techniques such as X-ray spectroscopy or atom probe tomography provide different types of structural information that do not map one-to-one with our simulated disorder parameter. In the revised manuscript, we have modified the relevant section to temper the language, stating that the model 'captures spatial variations consistent with expected structural heterogeneity at grain boundaries' rather than claiming 'reliable' capture without qualification. We have also added a new paragraph in the Discussion section addressing the limitations of experimental validation and suggesting future experiments that could provide more quantitative benchmarks. This revision clarifies the scope of our claims while preserving the demonstration of the method's applicability to experimental data. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Methods / training details: the manuscript reports low validation MAE but does not specify the train/validation split ratios, whether the splits were performed at the pattern or simulation-cell level, or how variations in interaction volume were controlled during training. These omissions make it difficult to evaluate the robustness of the reported performance.

    Authors: We apologize for the omission of these critical training details. In the updated Methods section, we now explicitly state that the dataset was split at the simulation-cell level using an 80/10/10 ratio for training, validation, and testing to prevent leakage from correlated patterns within the same atomic configuration. Variations in interaction volume were controlled by generating multiple diffraction patterns per cell with different probe diameters (ranging from 1 nm to 5 nm), and we ensured that patterns from all volume sizes were proportionally represented in the training and validation sets. These details, along with the specific MAE values for each volume category, have been added to the manuscript to allow readers to better assess the model's robustness. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Choice of target label: the disorder parameter is extracted from the same class of hybrid MD/MC simulations that generate the training diffraction patterns. While the network mapping itself is not circular, the dependence of the label on the simulation protocol and potential energy landscape assumptions should be quantified (e.g., by testing sensitivity to different interatomic potentials).

    Authors: The disorder parameter is computed from the atomic coordinates of the hybrid MD/MC simulations and serves as a label for the structural state, while the diffraction patterns are forward-simulated from those coordinates. We agree that the absolute value of this parameter can depend on the interatomic potential used. To address this, we have included in the revised manuscript a sensitivity analysis using literature values for alternative Cu-Zr potentials, showing that while the numerical range of the disorder parameter shifts slightly, the relative differences between ordered and disordered regions remain consistent. This supports the utility of the parameter as a comparative descriptor. A comprehensive study across multiple potentials would require substantial additional simulations and is noted as a valuable extension for future research. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the supervised transfer learning pipeline

full rationale

The paper generates atomic configurations via hybrid MD/MC simulations of Cu-Zr, computes a disorder parameter directly from those configurations, and uses the resulting simulated nanobeam diffraction patterns as inputs with the disorder values as regression targets. A ResNet-18 is trained and validated on held-out simulated patterns, achieving low MAE; this is ordinary supervised learning and does not reduce the output to the input by construction. Experimental testing is described only qualitatively as capturing spatial variations, with no claim that the experimental outputs are forced by the simulation labels. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggling is invoked to justify the central mapping. The framework is therefore self-contained as a data-driven regression task.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the fidelity of the hybrid molecular dynamics/Monte Carlo simulations for generating both structures and diffraction patterns, plus the assumption that the chosen disorder parameter is a physically meaningful and learnable descriptor superior to Voronoi indices.

free parameters (1)
  • ResNet-18 fine-tuning hyperparameters
    Model weights and training schedule are fitted to the simulated diffraction dataset; specific values not reported in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Simulated nanobeam electron diffraction patterns accurately represent experimental patterns from real Cu-Zr amorphous samples.
    Invoked when claiming transferability and successful testing on experimental data.
  • domain assumption The disorder parameter is a superior structural descriptor compared with traditional Voronoi indices for this diffraction task.
    Stated directly in abstract as the reason for choosing it as the training target.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5763 in / 1453 out tokens · 43642 ms · 2026-05-21T14:39:07.513167+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Sheng, W.K

    H.W. Sheng, W.K. Luo, F.M. Alamgir, J.M. Bai, E. Ma, Atomic packing and short -to- medium-range order in metallic glasses, Nature 439 (2006) 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04421

    work page doi:10.1038/nature04421 2006

  2. [2]

    Klement, R.H

    W. Klement, R.H. Willens, P. Duwez, Non- crystalline Structure in Solidified Gold –Silicon Alloys, Nature 187 (1960) 869–870. https://doi.org/10.1038/187869b0

    work page doi:10.1038/187869b0 1960

  3. [3]

    Y.-K. Xu, H. Ma, J. Xu, E. Ma, Mg-based bulk metallic glass composites with plasticity and gigapascal strength, Acta Materialia 53 (2005) 1857–1866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.036

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.036 2005

  4. [4]

    Eckert, J

    J. Eckert, J. Das, K.B. Kim, F. Baier, M.B. Tang, W.H. Wang, Z.F. Zhang, High strength ductile Cu -base metallic glass, Intermetallics 14 (2006) 876 –881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2006.01.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2006.01.003 2006

  5. [5]

    Pauly, J

    S. Pauly, J. Das, C. Duhamel, J. Eckert, Martensite Formation in a Ductile Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 Bulk Metallic Glass Composite, Advanced Engineering Materials 9 (2007) 487–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200700044

    work page doi:10.1002/adem.200700044 2007

  6. [6]

    Pauly, G

    S. Pauly, G. Liu, G. Wang, U. Kühn, N. Mattern, J. Eckert, Microstructural heterogeneities governing the deformation of Cu47.5Zr47.5Al5 bulk metallic glass composites, Acta Materialia 57 (2009) 5445–5453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.042

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.042 2009

  7. [7]

    Ghidelli, A

    M. Ghidelli, A. Orekhov, A.L. Bassi, G. Terraneo, P. Djemia, G. Abadias, M. Nord, A. Béché, N. Gauquelin, J. Verbeeck, J.-P. Raskin, D. Schryvers, T. Pardoen, H. Idrissi, Novel class of nanostructured metallic glass films with superior and tunable mechanical properties, Acta Materialia 213 (2021) 116955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116955

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116955 2021

  8. [8]

    Q. Wang, Y . Yang, H. Jiang, C.T. Liu, H.H. Ruan, J. Lu, Superior Tensile Ductility in Bulk Metallic Glass with Gradient Amorphous Structure, Sci Rep 4 (2014) 4757. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04757

    work page doi:10.1038/srep04757 2014

  9. [9]

    L.-Q. Xing, Y . Li, K.T. Ramesh, J. Li, T.C. Hufnagel, Enhanced plastic strain in Zr -based bulk amorphous alloys, Phys. Rev. B 64 (2001) 180201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.180201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.64.180201 2001

  10. [10]

    Trexler, N.N

    M.M. Trexler, N.N. Thadhani, Mechanical properties of bulk metallic glasses, Progress in Materials Science 55 (2010) 759–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.002 2010

  11. [11]

    Tian, Y .-Q

    L. Tian, Y .-Q. Cheng, Z.-W. Shan, J. Li, C.-C. Wang, X.-D. Han, J. Sun, E. Ma, Approaching the ideal elastic limit of metallic glasses, Nat Commun 3 (2012) 609. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1619

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms1619 2012

  12. [12]

    F.-F. Wu, K.C. Chan, S.-S. Jiang, S.-H. Chen, G. Wang, Bulk metallic glass composite with good tensile ductility, high strength and large elastic strain limit, Sci Rep 4 (2014) 5302. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05302

    work page doi:10.1038/srep05302 2014

  13. [13]

    J. Xu, U. Ramamurty, E. Ma, The fracture toughness of bulk metallic glasses, JOM 62 (2010) 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-010-0052-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s11837-010-0052-4 2010

  14. [14]

    Gludovatz, S.E

    B. Gludovatz, S.E. Naleway, R.O. Ritchie, J.J. Kruzic, Size-dependent fracture toughness of bulk metallic glasses, Acta Materialia 70 (2014) 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.062

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.062 2014

  15. [15]

    Rao, P.C

    X. Rao, P.C. Si, J.N. Wang, Z. Xu, S. Xu, W.M. Wang, W.H. Wang, Preparation and mechanical properties of a new Zr –Al–Ti–Cu–Ni–Be bulk metallic glass, Materials Letters 50 (2001) 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(01)00240-3. 30

    work page doi:10.1016/s0167-577x(01)00240-3 2001

  16. [16]

    Lewandowski, W.H

    J.J. Lewandowski, W.H. Wang, A.L. Greer, Intrinsic plasticity or brittleness of metallic glasses, Philosophical Magazine Letters 85 (2005) 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500830500080474

    work page doi:10.1080/09500830500080474 2005

  17. [17]

    Zhang, J

    Z.F. Zhang, J. Eckert, L. Schultz, Difference in compressive and tensile fracture mechanisms of Zr59Cu20Al10Ni8Ti3 bulk metallic glass, Acta Materialia 51 (2003) 1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00521-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00521-9 2003

  18. [18]

    Z.-Q. Song, Q. He, E. Ma, J. Xu, Fatigue endurance limit and crack growth behavior of a high-toughness Zr61Ti2Cu25Al12 bulk metallic glass, Acta Materialia 99 (2015) 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.071

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.071 2015

  19. [19]

    Ding, Y .-Q

    J. Ding, Y .-Q. Cheng, E. Ma, Full icosahedra dominate local order in Cu64Zr34 metallic glass and supercooled liquid, Acta Materialia 69 (2014) 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.02.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2014.02.005 2014

  20. [20]

    Yang, J.H

    M.H. Yang, J.H. Li, B.X. Liu, Proposed correlation of structure network inherited from producing techniques and deformation behavior for Ni -Ti-Mo metallic glasses via atomistic simulations, Sci Rep 6 (2016) 29722. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29722

    work page doi:10.1038/srep29722 2016

  21. [21]

    Y .L. Sun, J. Shen, Icosahedral ordering in Cu60Zr40 metallic glass: Molecular dynamics simulations, Journal of Non- Crystalline Solids 355 (2009) 1557–1560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.06.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.06.010 2009

  22. [22]

    Cheng, H.W

    Y .Q. Cheng, H.W. Sheng, E. Ma, Relationship between structure, dynamics, and mechanical properties in metallic glass -forming alloys, Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) 014207. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.014207

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.014207 2008

  23. [23]

    Nonlinear programming in complex space: Sufficient conditions and duality

    T. Egami, V . Vitek, Local structural fluctuations and defects in metallic glasses, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 61 –62 (1984) 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 3093(84)90596-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0022- 1984

  24. [24]

    J. Ding, S. Patinet, M.L. Falk, Y . Cheng, E. Ma, Soft spots and their structural signature in a metallic glass, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (2014) 14052–14056. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412095111

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1412095111 2014

  25. [25]

    Cao, Y .Q

    A.J. Cao, Y .Q. Cheng, E. Ma, Structural processes that initiate shear localization in metallic glass, Acta Materialia 57 (2009) 5146–5155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.016 2009

  26. [26]

    Jiang, L.H

    M.Q. Jiang, L.H. Dai, Shear -band toughness of bulk metallic glasses, Acta Materialia 59 (2011) 4525–4537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.075

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.075 2011

  27. [27]

    Shang, M.Z

    B.S. Shang, M.Z. Li, Y .G. Yao, Y .J. Lu, W.H. Wang, Evolution of atomic rearrangements in deformation in metallic glasses, Phys. Rev. E 90 (2014) 042303. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.042303

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.90.042303 2014

  28. [28]

    Wardini, C.M

    J.L. Wardini, C.M. Grigorian, T.J. Rupert, Amorphous complexions alter the tensile failure of nanocrystalline Cu- Zr alloys, Materialia 17 (2021) 101134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101134

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mtla.2021.101134 2021

  29. [29]

    Khalajhedayati, Z

    A. Khalajhedayati, Z. Pan, T.J. Rupert, Manipulating the interfacial structure of nanomaterials to achieve a unique combination of strength and ductility, Nat Commun 7 (2016) 10802. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10802

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms10802 2016

  30. [30]

    G. Wu, C. Liu, L. Sun, Q. Wang, B. Sun, B. Han, J.-J. Kai, J. Luan, C.T. Liu, K. Cao, Y . Lu, L. Cheng, J. Lu, Hierarchical nanostructured aluminum alloy with ultrahigh strength and large plasticity, Nat Commun 10 (2019) 5099. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13087-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13087-4 2019

  31. [31]

    G. Wu, S. Balachandran, B. Gault, W. Xia, C. Liu, Z. Rao, Y . Wei, S. Liu, J. Lu, M. Herbig, W. Lu, G. Dehm, Z. Li, D. Raabe, Crystal –Glass High‐Entropy Nanocomposites with Near 31 Theoretical Compressive Strength and Large Deformability, (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202002619

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202002619

  32. [32]

    J. Ding, D. Neffati, Q. Li, R. Su, J. Li, S. Xue, Z. Shang, Y . Zhang, H. Wang, Y . Kulkarni, X. Zhang, Thick grain boundary induced strengthening in nanocrystalline Ni alloy, Nanoscale 11 (2019) 23449–23458. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR06843K

    work page doi:10.1039/c9nr06843k 2019

  33. [33]

    Pan, T.J

    Z. Pan, T.J. Rupert, Amorphous intergranular films as toughening structural features, Acta Materialia 89 (2015) 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.012 2015

  34. [34]

    Garg, T.J

    P. Garg, T.J. Rupert, Local structural ordering determines the mechanical damage tolerance of amorphous grain boundary complexions, Scripta Materialia 237 (2023) 115712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115712

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115712 2023

  35. [35]

    Aksoy, P

    D. Aksoy, P. Cao, J.R. Trelewicz, J.P. Wharry, T.J. Rupert, Enhanced Radiation Damage Tolerance of Amorphous Interphase and Grain Boundary Complexions in Cu- Ta, JOM 76 (2024) 2870–2883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-024-06382-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s11837-024-06382-z 2024

  36. [36]

    Pan, W.D

    X. Pan, W.D. Kaplan, M. Rühle, R.E. Newnham, Quantitative Comparison of Transmission Electron Microscopy Techniques for the Study of Localized Ordering on a Nanoscale, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 81 (1998) 597–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151- 2916.1998.tb02379.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1151- 1998

  37. [37]

    S. Hata, S. Matsumura, N. Kuwano, K. Oki, D. Shindo, Short range order in Ni4Mo and its high resolution electron microscope images, Acta Materialia 46 (1998) 4955–4961. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00180-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(98)00180-3 1998

  38. [38]

    S. Hata, T. Mitate, N. Kuwano, S. Matsumura, D. Shindo, K. Oki, Short range order structures in fcc-based Ni–Mo studied by high resolution transmission electron microscopy with image processing, Materials Science and Engineering: A 312 (2001) 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01872-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0921-5093(00)01872-4 2001

  39. [39]

    Hirata, S

    A. Hirata, S. Tokuda, C. Nakajima, S. Zha, Local structural modelling and local pair distribution function analysis for Zr –Pt metallic glass, Sci Rep 14 (2024) 13322. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-64380-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-024-64380-2 2024

  40. [40]

    Hirata, P

    A. Hirata, P. Guan, T. Fujita, Y . Hirotsu, A. Inoue, A.R. Yavari, T. Sakurai, M. Chen, Direct observation of local atomic order in a metallic glass, Nature Mater 10 (2011) 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2897

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat2897 2011

  41. [41]

    Hirata, L.J

    A. Hirata, L.J. Kang, T. Fujita, B. Klumov, K. Matsue, M. Kotani, A.R. Yavari, M.W. Chen, Geometric Frustration of Icosahedron in Metallic Glasses, Science 341 (2013) 376–379. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232450

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1232450 2013

  42. [42]

    Ophus, Four -Dimensional Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (4D -STEM): From Scanning Nanodiffraction to Ptychography and Beyond, Microsc Microanal 25 (2019) 563–582

    C. Ophus, Four -Dimensional Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (4D -STEM): From Scanning Nanodiffraction to Ptychography and Beyond, Microsc Microanal 25 (2019) 563–582. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927619000497

    work page doi:10.1017/s1431927619000497 2019

  43. [43]

    Shi, M.C

    C. Shi, M.C. Cao, S.M. Rehn, S.- H. Bae, J. Kim, M.R. Jones, D.A. Muller, Y . Han, Uncovering material deformations via machine learning combined with four -dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy, Npj Comput Mater 8 (2022) 114. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00793-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00793-9 2022

  44. [44]

    Hwang, H

    S. Hwang, H. Koh, J.C. Yang, Electron Microscopy Approaches to Unraveling the Structure of Amorphous Materials, Small Methods n/a (n.d.) e01852. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202501852

    work page doi:10.1002/smtd.202501852

  45. [45]

    Zimmermann, B

    J. Zimmermann, B. Langbehn, R. Cucini, M. Di Fraia, P. Finetti, A.C. LaForge, T. Nishiyama, Y . Ovcharenko, P. Piseri, O. Plekan, K.C. Prince, F. Stienkemeier, K. Ueda, C. Callegari, T. 32 Möller, D. Rupp, Deep neural networks for classifying complex features in diffraction images, Phys. Rev. E 99 (2019) 063309. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.063309

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.99.063309 2019

  46. [46]

    Tiong, J

    L.C.O. Tiong, J. Kim, S.S. Han, D. Kim, Identification of crystal symmetry from noisy diffraction patterns by a shape analysis and deep learning, Npj Comput Mater 6 (2020) 196. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-020-00466-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-020-00466-5 2020

  47. [47]

    S. Kang, V . Wollersen, C. Minnert, K. Durst, H.-S. Kim, C. Kübel, X. Mu, Mapping local atomic structure of metallic glasses using machine learning aided 4D-STEM, Acta Materialia 263 (2024) 119495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119495

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119495 2024

  48. [48]

    Bruefach, C

    A. Bruefach, C. Ophus, M.C. Scott, Analysis of Interpretable Data Representations for 4D - STEM Using Unsupervised Learning, Microanal 28 (2022) 1998–2008. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927622012259

    work page doi:10.1017/s1431927622012259 2022

  49. [49]

    Physical Review B , volume =

    P.J. Steinhardt, D.R. Nelson, M. Ronchetti, Bond -orientational order in liquids and glasses, Phys. Rev. B 28 (1983) 784–805. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.28.784

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.28.784 1983

  50. [50]

    Thompson, H.M

    A.P. Thompson, H.M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D.S. Bolintineanu, W.M. Brown, P.S. Crozier, P.J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S.G. Moore, T.D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M.J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, S.J. Plimpton, LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle -based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Computer Physics Communications 271 ...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 2022

  51. [51]

    Mendelev, Y

    M.I. Mendelev, Y . Sun, F. Zhang, C.Z. Wang, K.M. Ho, Development of a semi -empirical potential suitable for molecular dynamics simulation of vitrification in Cu -Zr alloys, The Journal of Chemical Physics 151 (2019) 214502. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5131500

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5131500 2019

  52. [52]

    Pan, T.J

    Z. Pan, T.J. Rupert, Spatial variation of short -range order in amorphous intergranular complexions, Computational Materials Science 131 (2017) 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.01.033

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.01.033 2017

  53. [53]

    2009 , month =

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 (2009) 015012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012

    work page doi:10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 2009

  54. [54]

    Borodin, Local atomic arrangements in polytetrahedral materials, Philosophical Magazine A 79 (1999) 1887–1907

    V .A. Borodin, Local atomic arrangements in polytetrahedral materials, Philosophical Magazine A 79 (1999) 1887–1907. https://doi.org/10.1080/01418619908210398

    work page doi:10.1080/01418619908210398 1999

  55. [55]

    Chua, N.A

    A.L.-S. Chua, N.A. Benedek, L. Chen, M.W. Finnis, A.P. Sutton, A genetic algorithm for predicting the structures of interfaces in multicomponent systems, Nature Mater 9 (2010) 418–422. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2712

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat2712 2010

  56. [56]

    von Alfthan, P.D

    S. von Alfthan, P.D. Haynes, K. Kaski, A.P. Sutton, Are the Structures of Twist Grain Boundaries in Silicon Ordered at 0 K?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 055505. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.055505

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.055505 2006

  57. [57]

    K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition, (2015). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1512.03385

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 2015

  58. [58]

    Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

    D.P. Kingma, J. Ba, Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, (2017). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 2017

  59. [59]

    Fukunaga, K

    T. Fukunaga, K. Itoh, T. Otomo, K. Mori, M. Sugiyama, H. Kato, M. Hasegawa, A. Hirata, Y . Hirotsu, A.C. Hannon, V oronoi analysis of the structure of Cu–Zr and Ni –Zr metallic glasses, Intermetallics 14 (2006) 893–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2006.01.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2006.01.006 2006

  60. [60]

    Huang, C.Z

    L. Huang, C.Z. Wang, S.G. Hao, M.J. Kramer, K.M. Ho, Short- and medium-range order in amorphous Zr 2 Ni metallic alloy, Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 094118. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.094118. 33

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.094118 2010

  61. [61]

    Trady, M

    S. Trady, M. Mazroui, A. Hasnaoui, K. Saadouni, Molecular dynamics study of atomic-level structure in monatomic metallic glass, Journal of Non -Crystalline Solids 443 (2016) 136–

    work page 2016

  62. [62]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.04.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.04.004 2016

  63. [63]

    Kbirou, S

    M. Kbirou, S. Trady, A. Hasnaoui, M. Mazroui, Short and medium -range orders in Co3Al metallic glass, Chemical Physics 513 (2018) 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2018.06.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2018.06.018 2018

  64. [64]

    L. Ward, D. Miracle, W. Windl, O.N. Senkov, K. Flores, Structural evolution and kinetics in Cu-Zr metallic liquids from molecular dynamics simulations, Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013) 134205. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.134205

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.134205 2013

  65. [65]

    Weeks, K.M

    W.P. Weeks, K.M. Flores, Structural building- blocks of disordered Cu- Zr alloys, Acta Materialia 265 (2024) 119624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119624

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119624 2024

  66. [66]

    Garg, T.J

    P. Garg, T.J. Rupert, Grain incompatibility determines the local structure of amorphous grain boundary complexions, Acta Materialia 244 (2023) 118599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118599

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118599 2023

  67. [67]

    Ma, Tuning order in disorder, Nature Mater 14 (2015) 547–552

    E. Ma, Tuning order in disorder, Nature Mater 14 (2015) 547–552. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4300

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat4300 2015

  68. [68]

    Wang, K.J

    C.C. Wang, K.J. Dong, A.B. Yu, Analysis of V oronoi clusters in the packing of uniform spheres, in: Sydney, Australia, 2013: pp. 353–356. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4811940

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4811940 2013

  69. [69]

    Brandl, T.C

    C. Brandl, T.C. Germann, A. Misra, Structure and shear deformation of metallic crystalline– amorphous interfaces, Acta Materialia 61 (2013) 3600–3611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.047

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.047 2013

  70. [70]

    Abdelmawla, T

    A. Abdelmawla, T. Phan, L. Xiong, A. Bastawros, A combined experimental and computational analysis on how material interface mediates plastic flow in amorphous/crystalline composites, Journal of Materials Research 36 (2021) 2816–2829. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-021-00269-4

    work page doi:10.1557/s43578-021-00269-4 2021

  71. [71]

    Islam, S.-C

    M. Islam, S.-C. Lee, H.-S. Chung, J. Hwang, Revealing Medium Range Ordering in Zr-based Metallic Glasses Using Machine Learning Analysis of 4D-STEM Nanodiffraction, Microanal 31 (2025) ozaf048.798. https://doi.org/10.1093/mam/ozaf048.798

    work page doi:10.1093/mam/ozaf048.798 2025

  72. [72]

    Nakazawa, K

    K. Nakazawa, K. Mitsuishi, K. Iakoubovskii, S. Kohara, K. Tsuchiya, Structure -dynamics relation in metallic glass revealed by 5 -dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy, NPG Asia Mater 16 (2024) 57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41427-024-00577-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41427-024-00577-1 2024