Interacting type-II semi-Dirac quasiparticles

Mohamed M. Elsayed; Taras I. Lakoba; Valeri N. Kotov

arxiv: 2601.21098 · v4 · pith:43LPUBHInew · submitted 2026-01-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall

Interacting type-II semi-Dirac quasiparticles

Mohamed M. Elsayed , Taras I. Lakoba , Valeri N. Kotov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 14:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords type-II semi-Dirac fermionselectron-electron interactionstopological phase boundaryhybrid electronic phaseLandau levelsdensity of statescritical exponentsrenormalization group

0 comments

The pith

Long-range electron interactions stabilize a hybrid Dirac and type-II semi-Dirac phase with continuously varying critical exponents.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies type-II semi-Dirac fermions that form when three Dirac cones merge in two-dimensional systems such as oxide heterostructures. It applies Hartree-Fock, renormalization-group and RPA methods to show that long-range Coulomb interactions transform the low-energy spectrum at the topological phase boundary. The resulting hybrid phase mixes Dirac and type-II semi-Dirac features, so that critical exponents for physical quantities change smoothly with Fermi energy instead of taking fixed values. This produces a crossover in dispersion from anisotropic Dirac cones at low energy to the characteristic semi-Dirac boomerang shape at higher energy, together with a matching change in density of states from linear to proportional to the cube root of energy. The location of the crossover is set by the interaction strength.

Core claim

At the topological phase boundary, long-range correlations stabilize a hybrid electronic phase displaying both Dirac and type-II semi-Dirac qualities, with physical characteristics exhibiting continuously varying critical exponents as a function of the Fermi energy; for example Landau levels in a magnetic field vary with the energy scale: |ε_n(B)| ∼ (nB)^{1/2} → (nB)^{3/4}. The quasiparticle spectrum evolves, driven by interactions, from anisotropic Dirac dispersion at the lowest energies, towards the characteristic type-II semi-Dirac boomerang shape as the energy increases. The corresponding density of states concomitantly varies between linear and power one third (ρ(ε) ∼ |ε| → |ε|^{1/3}).

What carries the argument

The effective interacting Hamiltonian analyzed with Hartree-Fock, renormalization-group and RPA approximations that produce an interaction-driven crossover between Dirac and type-II semi-Dirac dispersions.

If this is right

Landau-level energies scale as (nB)^{1/2} at low Fermi energy and cross over to (nB)^{3/4} at higher Fermi energy.
Density of states changes continuously from linear in |ε| to |ε|^{1/3} with increasing energy.
The energy scale separating the two regimes is set by the dimensionless interaction strength α = e²/(ℏv).
The hybrid phase combines low-energy anisotropic Dirac cones with higher-energy type-II semi-Dirac boomerang dispersion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar interaction-induced crossovers could appear in other multi-cone Dirac systems when long-range interactions are tuned.
Angle-resolved photoemission at varying doping levels might directly map the predicted evolution from linear to boomerang dispersion.
Specific-heat or compressibility measurements would be expected to reflect the non-standard energy dependence of the density of states.

Load-bearing premise

The effective interacting Hamiltonian together with the Hartree-Fock, renormalization-group and RPA approximations remain quantitatively reliable across the full range of interaction strengths and Fermi energies considered.

What would settle it

Tunneling spectroscopy or Landau-level measurements that show neither a transition in density of states from linear to |ε|^{1/3} nor an interpolation of Landau-level scaling between (nB)^{1/2} and (nB)^{3/4} at different Fermi energies would rule out the hybrid phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.21098 by Mohamed M. Elsayed, Taras I. Lakoba, Valeri N. Kotov.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Low-energy electronic dispersion corresponding to the Hamiltonian in Eq.(1) under a small perturbation ∆, such that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Contour plot of the critical low-energy spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Type-II semi-Dirac spectrum renormalized by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Evolution of the power [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Static polarization function for type-II semi-Dirac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: While results are qualitatively similar to their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Evolution of the density of states scaling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Type-II semi-Dirac fermions in two dimensions have been proposed to describe topologically nontrivial low-energy excitations in titanium/vanadium oxide heterostructures. These quasiparticles appear at the merger of three Dirac cones, resulting in a non-zero Berry phase. We find, by employing Hartree-Fock, renormalization group and Random Phase Approximation (RPA) techniques, that the spectrum is very sensitive to long-range electron-electron interactions and can undergo a profound transformation. Our results indicate that at the topological phase boundary, long-range correlations stabilize a hybrid electronic phase displaying both Dirac and type-II semi-Dirac qualities, with physical characteristics exhibiting continuously varying critical exponents as a function of the Fermi energy; for example Landau levels in a magnetic field vary with the energy scale: $|\varepsilon_n(B)|\sim (nB)^{1/2} \rightarrow (nB)^{3/4}, n\in \mathbb{N}_0$. The quasiparticle spectrum evolves, driven by interactions, from anisotropic Dirac dispersion at the lowest energies, towards the characteristic type-II semi-Dirac boomerang shape as the energy increases. The corresponding density of states concomitantly varies between linear and power one third ($\rho(\varepsilon) \sim |\varepsilon| \rightarrow |\varepsilon|^{1/3}$). The crossover scale is controlled by the interaction strength $\alpha = e^2/(\hbar v)$ and the specifics of the effective interacting Hamiltonian.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper uses HF, RG and RPA on a type-II semi-Dirac model to argue for an interaction-driven hybrid phase with energy-dependent exponents, but the approximations may not hold reliably at the topological boundary.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that long-range interactions appear to drive a crossover from Dirac-like to type-II semi-Dirac behavior in this model, producing a hybrid phase whose critical exponents vary continuously with Fermi energy and are set by the interaction strength alpha. Landau-level scaling is said to shift from (nB)^{1/2} to (nB)^{3/4} and the density of states from linear to |ε|^{1/3}. The crossover scale is controlled by alpha and the form of the effective Hamiltonian. The authors reach this by applying Hartree-Fock, renormalization-group flow, and RPA to the low-energy model proposed for titanium/vanadium oxide heterostructures. The spectrum is reported to evolve from anisotropic Dirac dispersion at the lowest energies toward the characteristic boomerang shape at higher energies. This gives a concrete, if approximate, picture of how interactions can modify the topological features at the merger of three Dirac cones. The work does a reasonable job of taking an existing model and showing what standard many-body tools produce when long-range Coulomb interactions are added. It supplies explicit scaling examples that could be checked in transport or spectroscopy on the relevant heterostructures. The central limitation is the reliance on perturbative and mean-field methods. Hartree-Fock plus RPA and RG can miss non-perturbative corrections or strong-coupling fixed points, especially right at a topological phase boundary where the interactions are long-range. The paper does not appear to include extensive benchmarks against exact diagonalization, quantum Monte Carlo, or higher-order diagrammatic corrections that would test whether the smooth crossover survives. If the derivations stay inside the effective Hamiltonian without independent falsification, the varying exponents risk being tied to the input parameter alpha rather than emerging as a robust outcome. This is aimed at theorists who work on interacting Dirac and semi-Dirac fermions in two-dimensional oxide systems. A reader already thinking about tunable critical exponents or effective models for heterostructures could extract some useful scaling relations, though the results would need to be treated as suggestive until the approximations are stress-tested further. I would send it to peer review. The calculations are standard and the claims are stated clearly enough that referees can check the technical steps and ask for additional validation where the approximations are stretched.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines the impact of long-range Coulomb interactions on type-II semi-Dirac quasiparticles that emerge at the merger of three Dirac cones in two-dimensional titanium/vanadium oxide heterostructures. Employing Hartree-Fock, renormalization-group, and RPA techniques on an effective interacting Hamiltonian, the authors report that at the topological phase boundary these interactions stabilize a hybrid phase combining Dirac and type-II semi-Dirac characteristics. Physical observables exhibit continuously varying critical exponents as a function of Fermi energy, with explicit examples including a crossover in Landau-level scaling |ε_n(B)| ∼ (nB)^{1/2} → (nB)^{3/4} and in the density of states ρ(ε) ∼ |ε| → |ε|^{1/3}; the crossover energy scale is controlled by the dimensionless interaction strength α = e²/(ℏv).

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would establish a concrete mechanism by which long-range interactions can drive a tunable hybrid quasiparticle phase at a topological boundary, with continuously varying exponents that are in principle accessible via magnetic-field spectroscopy or tunneling. The combination of HF, RG, and RPA on a microscopically motivated Hamiltonian constitutes a strength, as does the explicit prediction of scale-dependent Landau-level and DOS exponents that could be tested experimentally in oxide heterostructures.

major comments (2)

[§3 (RG and RPA analysis)] The derivation of the hybrid phase and the continuous exponent variation (abstract and §3) rests on the effective interacting Hamiltonian plus HF/RG/RPA remaining quantitatively accurate over the full range of α and Fermi energies. At the topological phase boundary, long-range Coulomb interactions are known to be capable of generating non-perturbative corrections or strong-coupling fixed points; the manuscript provides no explicit error estimate, comparison to higher-order diagrams, or non-perturbative benchmark that would confirm the reported smooth crossover is not an artifact of the chosen approximations.
[§4.1 (Landau levels)] The Landau-level scaling crossover |ε_n(B)| ∼ (nB)^{1/2} → (nB)^{3/4} is presented as a direct consequence of the interaction-driven spectrum evolution. However, the energy scale at which the exponent changes is stated to be set by α; without an independent calculation of the crossover (e.g., via self-consistent solution of the Dyson equation or comparison to exact diagonalization on small clusters), it is unclear whether the reported scaling is an output or is built into the effective model by construction.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction / Methods] Notation for the interaction parameter α is introduced in the abstract but its precise definition (including any cutoff dependence) should be restated at the beginning of the methods section for clarity.
[Figures 3 and 4] Figure captions for the DOS and Landau-level plots should explicitly label the energy ranges corresponding to the Dirac-like and semi-Dirac-like regimes to aid the reader in identifying the crossover.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive report. We address the major comments point by point below. Revisions have been incorporated to strengthen the discussion of approximation validity and to clarify the origin of the reported scaling crossovers.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3 (RG and RPA analysis)] The derivation of the hybrid phase and the continuous exponent variation (abstract and §3) rests on the effective interacting Hamiltonian plus HF/RG/RPA remaining quantitatively accurate over the full range of α and Fermi energies. At the topological phase boundary, long-range Coulomb interactions are known to be capable of generating non-perturbative corrections or strong-coupling fixed points; the manuscript provides no explicit error estimate, comparison to higher-order diagrams, or non-perturbative benchmark that would confirm the reported smooth crossover is not an artifact of the chosen approximations.

Authors: We agree that explicit discussion of the controlled regime of our approximations is warranted. The combination of Hartree-Fock, one-loop RG, and RPA is standard for long-range interacting Dirac systems and has been benchmarked against higher-order results in related models (e.g., graphene). In the revised manuscript we have added to §3 a paragraph quantifying the range of α for which the RG flows remain perturbative, together with a brief comparison to known strong-coupling limits in the literature. While a fully non-perturbative benchmark lies outside the present scope, the smooth crossover we report is robust within the perturbative window accessed by the RG equations. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.1 (Landau levels)] The Landau-level scaling crossover |ε_n(B)| ∼ (nB)^{1/2} → (nB)^{3/4} is presented as a direct consequence of the interaction-driven spectrum evolution. However, the energy scale at which the exponent changes is stated to be set by α; without an independent calculation of the crossover (e.g., via self-consistent solution of the Dyson equation or comparison to exact diagonalization on small clusters), it is unclear whether the reported scaling is an output or is built into the effective model by construction.

Authors: The crossover scale is an output of the RG analysis rather than an input. The effective Hamiltonian supplies only the bare parameters at the topological boundary; the energy dependence of the velocities and the resulting hybrid dispersion are obtained by integrating the RG flow equations. The crossover energy is read off from the numerical solution of these flows for each α. In the revised §4.1 we now display the explicit RG beta functions and illustrate how the crossover is extracted from the running parameters. A self-consistent Dyson-equation treatment or exact diagonalization would be valuable extensions, but they are not required to establish that the scaling change follows from the RG evolution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results derived from standard approximations on effective Hamiltonian

full rationale

The paper applies Hartree-Fock, renormalization-group, and RPA methods to an effective interacting Hamiltonian for type-II semi-Dirac quasiparticles at the topological phase boundary. The hybrid phase, continuously varying exponents (e.g., Landau-level scaling from (nB)^{1/2} to (nB)^{3/4} and DOS from |ε| to |ε|^{1/3}), and crossover scale controlled by α emerge as computed outcomes of these techniques rather than inputs or self-definitions. No quoted step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing claim rely on a self-citation chain that collapses to an unverified ansatz. The derivation remains self-contained against the stated approximations and effective model.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of an effective interacting Hamiltonian whose precise form is not given in the abstract and on the quantitative accuracy of three standard approximation schemes; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)

interaction strength alpha
Defined as e^2 / (hbar v) and stated to control the crossover scale between Dirac and semi-Dirac regimes.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The effective interacting Hamiltonian accurately captures the long-range electron-electron interactions at the topological phase boundary.
Invoked to justify the use of Hartree-Fock, RG and RPA for studying spectrum sensitivity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5799 in / 1263 out tokens · 57841 ms · 2026-05-21T14:32:18.865462+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We find, by employing Hartree-Fock, renormalization group and Random Phase Approximation (RPA) techniques, that the spectrum is very sensitive to long-range electron-electron interactions... crossover scale is controlled by the interaction strength α = e²/(ℏv)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Landau levels... |ε_n(B)| ∼ (nB)^{1/2} → (nB)^{3/4}... ρ(ε) ∼ |ε| → |ε|^{1/3}

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

[1]

and ordinary semi-Dirac fermions, the coupling con- stant is marginally irrelevant. However, in contrast to type-I semi-Dirac fermions where the presence of a char- acteristic log2 divergence ing 1 at first order generates a higher-order resummation [3, 16], the type-II couplings remain unchanged under RG. Effective Hamiltonian—In addition to the logarith...

work page
[2]

Montambaux, F

G. Montambaux, F. Pi´ echon, J.-N. Fuchs, and M. O. Goerbig, Merging of Dirac points in a two-dimensional crystal, Phys. Rev. B80, 153412 (2009)

work page 2009
[3]

Montambaux, F

G. Montambaux, F. Pi´ echon, J.-N. Fuchs, and M. Goer- big, A universal Hamiltonian for motion and merging of Dirac points in a two-dimensional crystal, The European Physical Journal B72, 509 (2009)

work page 2009
[4]

M. M. Elsayed, B. Uchoa, and V. N. Kotov, Coulomb in- teractions in systems of generalized semi-Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B111, 165127 (2025)

work page 2025
[5]

Roy and M

B. Roy and M. S. Foster, Quantum Multicriticality near the Dirac-Semimetal to Band-Insulator Critical Point in Two Dimensions: A Controlled Ascent from One Dimen- sion, Phys. Rev. X8, 011049 (2018)

work page 2018
[6]

M. M. Elsayed and V. N. Kotov, Microscopic lattice model for quartic semi-Dirac fermions in two dimensions, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 315501 (2025)

work page 2025
[7]

Huang, Z

H. Huang, Z. Liu, H. Zhang, W. Duan, and D. Vander- bilt, Emergence of a Chern-insulating state from a semi- Dirac dispersion, Phys. Rev. B92, 161115 (2015)

work page 2015
[8]

Pardo and W

V. Pardo and W. E. Pickett, Metal-insulator transition through a semi-Dirac point in oxide nanostructures: VO2 6 (001) layers confined within TiO 2, Phys. Rev. B81, 035111 (2010)

work page 2010
[9]

Z. Liao, H. Zeng, E. Wang, and H. Huang, Berry Curva- ture Dipole and Nonlinear Hall Effect in Type-II Semi- Dirac Systems, Small , 2409691 (2025)

work page 2025
[10]

Son, S.-M

Y.-W. Son, S.-M. Choi, Y. P. Hong, S. Woo, and S.- H. Jhi, Electronic topological transition in sliding bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B84, 155410 (2011)

work page 2011
[11]

Chen, Y.-Y

J.-N. Chen, Y.-Y. Yang, Y.-L. Zhou, Y.-J. Wu, H.-J. Duan, M.-X. Deng, and R.-Q. Wang, Photon-modulated linear and nonlinear anomalous Hall effects in type-II semi-Dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. B105, 085124 (2022)

work page 2022
[12]

Xiong, J.-Y

Q.-Y. Xiong, J.-Y. Ba, H.-J. Duan, M.-X. Deng, Y.-M. Wang, and R.-Q. Wang, Optical conductivity and po- larization rotation of type-II semi-Dirac materials, Phys. Rev. B107, 155150 (2023)

work page 2023
[13]

Y. Shao, S. Moon, A. N. Rudenko, J. Wang, J. Herzog- Arbeitman, M. Ozerov, D. Graf, Z. Sun, R. Queiroz, S. H. Lee, Y. Zhu, Z. Mao, M. I. Katsnelson, B. A. Bernevig, D. Smirnov, A. J. Millis, and D. N. Basov, Semi-Dirac Fermions in a Topological Metal, Phys. Rev. X14, 041057 (2024)

work page 2024
[14]

Dietl, F

P. Dietl, F. Pi´ echon, and G. Montambaux, New Magnetic Field Dependence of Landau Levels in a Graphenelike Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 236405 (2008)

work page 2008
[15]

Goerbig and G

M. Goerbig and G. Montambaux, Dirac Fermions in Con- densed Matter and Beyond, inDirac Matter, edited by B. Duplantier, V. Rivasseau, and J.-N. Fuchs (Springer International Publishing, 2017) pp. 25–53

work page 2017
[16]

de Gail, J.-N

R. de Gail, J.-N. Fuchs, M. Goerbig, F. Pi´ echon, and G. Montambaux, Manipulation of Dirac points in graphene-like crystals, Physica B: Condensed Matter 407, 1948 (2012)

work page 1948
[17]

V. N. Kotov, B. Uchoa, and O. P. Sushkov, Coulomb interactions and renormalization of semi-Dirac fermions near a topological Lifshitz transition, Phys. Rev. B103, 045403 (2021)

work page 2021
[18]

Uchoa and K

B. Uchoa and K. Seo, Superconducting states for semi- Dirac fermions at zero and finite magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B96, 220503 (2017)

work page 2017
[19]

M. D. Uryszek, E. Christou, A. Jaefari, F. Kr¨ uger, and B. Uchoa, Quantum criticality of semi-Dirac fermions in 2 + 1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. B100, 155101 (2019)

work page 2019
[20]

Isobe, B.-J

H. Isobe, B.-J. Yang, A. Chubukov, J. Schmalian, and N. Nagaosa, Emergent Non-Fermi-Liquid at the Quan- tum Critical Point of a Topological Phase Transition in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 076803 (2016)

work page 2016
[21]

He, C.-H

P. He, C.-H. Hsu, S. Shi, K. Cai, J. Wang, Q. Wang, G. Eda, H. Lin, V. M. Pereira, and H. Yang, Nonlinear magnetotransport shaped by Fermi surface topology and convexity, Nature Communications10, 1290 (2019)

work page 2019
[22]

V. N. Kotov, B. Uchoa, V. M. Pereira, F. Guinea, and A. H. Castro Neto, Electron-Electron Interactions in Graphene: Current Status and Perspectives, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1067 (2012)

work page 2012
[23]

S. M. Girvin and K. Yang,Modern Condensed Matter Physics(Cambridge University Press, 2019)

work page 2019
[24]

Martin, N

J. Martin, N. Akerman, G. Ulbricht, T. Lohmann, J. H. Smet, K. von Klitzing, and A. Yacoby, Observation of electron–hole puddles in graphene using a scanning single-electron transistor, Nature Physics4, 144 (2007)

work page 2007
[25]

D. E. Sheehy and J. Schmalian, Quantum Critical Scaling in Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 226803 (2007)

work page 2007
[26]

A. A. Abrikosov,Fundamentals of the Theory of Metals (North-Holland, 1988)

work page 1988
[27]

G. P. Mikitik and Y. V. Sharlai, Manifestation of Berry’s Phase in Metal Physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 2147 (1999)

work page 1999
[28]

INTERACTING TYPE-II SEMI-DIRAC QUASIP AR TICLES

D. L. Maslov and A. V. Chubukov, Optical response of correlated electron systems, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 026503 (2016). 7 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL FOR “INTERACTING TYPE-II SEMI-DIRAC QUASIP AR TICLES” Mohamed M. Elsayed, T aras I. Lakoba, V aleri N. Kotov In this supplement we provide additional information and details. We have used the conventi...

work page 2016

[1] [1]

and ordinary semi-Dirac fermions, the coupling con- stant is marginally irrelevant. However, in contrast to type-I semi-Dirac fermions where the presence of a char- acteristic log2 divergence ing 1 at first order generates a higher-order resummation [3, 16], the type-II couplings remain unchanged under RG. Effective Hamiltonian—In addition to the logarith...

work page

[2] [2]

Montambaux, F

G. Montambaux, F. Pi´ echon, J.-N. Fuchs, and M. O. Goerbig, Merging of Dirac points in a two-dimensional crystal, Phys. Rev. B80, 153412 (2009)

work page 2009

[3] [3]

Montambaux, F

G. Montambaux, F. Pi´ echon, J.-N. Fuchs, and M. Goer- big, A universal Hamiltonian for motion and merging of Dirac points in a two-dimensional crystal, The European Physical Journal B72, 509 (2009)

work page 2009

[4] [4]

M. M. Elsayed, B. Uchoa, and V. N. Kotov, Coulomb in- teractions in systems of generalized semi-Dirac fermions, Phys. Rev. B111, 165127 (2025)

work page 2025

[5] [5]

Roy and M

B. Roy and M. S. Foster, Quantum Multicriticality near the Dirac-Semimetal to Band-Insulator Critical Point in Two Dimensions: A Controlled Ascent from One Dimen- sion, Phys. Rev. X8, 011049 (2018)

work page 2018

[6] [6]

M. M. Elsayed and V. N. Kotov, Microscopic lattice model for quartic semi-Dirac fermions in two dimensions, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter37, 315501 (2025)

work page 2025

[7] [7]

Huang, Z

H. Huang, Z. Liu, H. Zhang, W. Duan, and D. Vander- bilt, Emergence of a Chern-insulating state from a semi- Dirac dispersion, Phys. Rev. B92, 161115 (2015)

work page 2015

[8] [8]

Pardo and W

V. Pardo and W. E. Pickett, Metal-insulator transition through a semi-Dirac point in oxide nanostructures: VO2 6 (001) layers confined within TiO 2, Phys. Rev. B81, 035111 (2010)

work page 2010

[9] [9]

Z. Liao, H. Zeng, E. Wang, and H. Huang, Berry Curva- ture Dipole and Nonlinear Hall Effect in Type-II Semi- Dirac Systems, Small , 2409691 (2025)

work page 2025

[10] [10]

Son, S.-M

Y.-W. Son, S.-M. Choi, Y. P. Hong, S. Woo, and S.- H. Jhi, Electronic topological transition in sliding bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B84, 155410 (2011)

work page 2011

[11] [11]

Chen, Y.-Y

J.-N. Chen, Y.-Y. Yang, Y.-L. Zhou, Y.-J. Wu, H.-J. Duan, M.-X. Deng, and R.-Q. Wang, Photon-modulated linear and nonlinear anomalous Hall effects in type-II semi-Dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. B105, 085124 (2022)

work page 2022

[12] [12]

Xiong, J.-Y

Q.-Y. Xiong, J.-Y. Ba, H.-J. Duan, M.-X. Deng, Y.-M. Wang, and R.-Q. Wang, Optical conductivity and po- larization rotation of type-II semi-Dirac materials, Phys. Rev. B107, 155150 (2023)

work page 2023

[13] [13]

Y. Shao, S. Moon, A. N. Rudenko, J. Wang, J. Herzog- Arbeitman, M. Ozerov, D. Graf, Z. Sun, R. Queiroz, S. H. Lee, Y. Zhu, Z. Mao, M. I. Katsnelson, B. A. Bernevig, D. Smirnov, A. J. Millis, and D. N. Basov, Semi-Dirac Fermions in a Topological Metal, Phys. Rev. X14, 041057 (2024)

work page 2024

[14] [14]

Dietl, F

P. Dietl, F. Pi´ echon, and G. Montambaux, New Magnetic Field Dependence of Landau Levels in a Graphenelike Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 236405 (2008)

work page 2008

[15] [15]

Goerbig and G

M. Goerbig and G. Montambaux, Dirac Fermions in Con- densed Matter and Beyond, inDirac Matter, edited by B. Duplantier, V. Rivasseau, and J.-N. Fuchs (Springer International Publishing, 2017) pp. 25–53

work page 2017

[16] [16]

de Gail, J.-N

R. de Gail, J.-N. Fuchs, M. Goerbig, F. Pi´ echon, and G. Montambaux, Manipulation of Dirac points in graphene-like crystals, Physica B: Condensed Matter 407, 1948 (2012)

work page 1948

[17] [17]

V. N. Kotov, B. Uchoa, and O. P. Sushkov, Coulomb interactions and renormalization of semi-Dirac fermions near a topological Lifshitz transition, Phys. Rev. B103, 045403 (2021)

work page 2021

[18] [18]

Uchoa and K

B. Uchoa and K. Seo, Superconducting states for semi- Dirac fermions at zero and finite magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B96, 220503 (2017)

work page 2017

[19] [19]

M. D. Uryszek, E. Christou, A. Jaefari, F. Kr¨ uger, and B. Uchoa, Quantum criticality of semi-Dirac fermions in 2 + 1 dimensions, Phys. Rev. B100, 155101 (2019)

work page 2019

[20] [20]

Isobe, B.-J

H. Isobe, B.-J. Yang, A. Chubukov, J. Schmalian, and N. Nagaosa, Emergent Non-Fermi-Liquid at the Quan- tum Critical Point of a Topological Phase Transition in Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 076803 (2016)

work page 2016

[21] [21]

He, C.-H

P. He, C.-H. Hsu, S. Shi, K. Cai, J. Wang, Q. Wang, G. Eda, H. Lin, V. M. Pereira, and H. Yang, Nonlinear magnetotransport shaped by Fermi surface topology and convexity, Nature Communications10, 1290 (2019)

work page 2019

[22] [22]

V. N. Kotov, B. Uchoa, V. M. Pereira, F. Guinea, and A. H. Castro Neto, Electron-Electron Interactions in Graphene: Current Status and Perspectives, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1067 (2012)

work page 2012

[23] [23]

S. M. Girvin and K. Yang,Modern Condensed Matter Physics(Cambridge University Press, 2019)

work page 2019

[24] [24]

Martin, N

J. Martin, N. Akerman, G. Ulbricht, T. Lohmann, J. H. Smet, K. von Klitzing, and A. Yacoby, Observation of electron–hole puddles in graphene using a scanning single-electron transistor, Nature Physics4, 144 (2007)

work page 2007

[25] [25]

D. E. Sheehy and J. Schmalian, Quantum Critical Scaling in Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 226803 (2007)

work page 2007

[26] [26]

A. A. Abrikosov,Fundamentals of the Theory of Metals (North-Holland, 1988)

work page 1988

[27] [27]

G. P. Mikitik and Y. V. Sharlai, Manifestation of Berry’s Phase in Metal Physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 2147 (1999)

work page 1999

[28] [28]

INTERACTING TYPE-II SEMI-DIRAC QUASIP AR TICLES

D. L. Maslov and A. V. Chubukov, Optical response of correlated electron systems, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 026503 (2016). 7 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL FOR “INTERACTING TYPE-II SEMI-DIRAC QUASIP AR TICLES” Mohamed M. Elsayed, T aras I. Lakoba, V aleri N. Kotov In this supplement we provide additional information and details. We have used the conventi...

work page 2016