pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2601.21425 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-29 · ⚛️ nucl-ex

Recognition: no theorem link

The ⁸Be nucleus and the Hoyle state in dissociation of relativistic nuclei

D.A. Artemenkov , A.A. Zaitsev , P.I. Zarubin
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 10:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex
keywords nuclear fragmentationrelativistic dissociation8Be nucleusHoyle statenuclear clusteringnuclear emulsionalpha particles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Relativistic nuclear dissociation shows 8Be ground state and Hoyle state rising sharply with alpha-particle number.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports measurements of fragment emission angles in nuclear emulsion for relativistic nuclei breaking apart. Invariant masses reconstructed from those angles identify specific decays including the ground state of 8Be, its 2+ state, states in 9Be and 9B, 6Be, the Hoyle state of 12C, and the 3- state of 12C. The fraction of events matching the 8Be ground state, 9B, and the Hoyle state grows rapidly as the number of alpha particles increases. The pattern appears across several different parent nuclei and is interpreted as evidence that alpha clusters fuse inside the excited systems. The emulsion technique supplies complete, high-resolution detection of all light fragments in each event.

Core claim

According to the invariant masses calculated from the emission angles in the fragmentation cone, the decays of 8Be(0+), 8Be(2+), 9Be(1.7), 9B, 6Be, 12C(0+_2) or the Hoyle state and 12C(3-) have been identified. The contribution of 8Be(0+), 9B and 12C(0+_2) increases rapidly with the alpha-particle multiplicity. Their structure and the diversity of parent nuclei suggest the fusion of the latter.

What carries the argument

Invariant-mass reconstruction from measured emission angles of fragments inside the narrow forward cone of relativistic dissociation.

If this is right

  • Higher-multiplicity alpha events preferentially contain the ground-state 8Be, 9B, and Hoyle-state configurations.
  • The same cluster states appear in the dissociation of several different parent nuclei, pointing to a common formation route.
  • Automated scanning of emulsion exposures can extend the statistics to higher energies at facilities such as NICA.
  • The observed states remain cold enough to survive the fragmentation process, consistent with low-excitation cluster structures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The multiplicity trend could be tested by comparing emulsion results with modern silicon trackers at fixed-target or collider energies.
  • If the pattern holds, it supplies empirical input for models of alpha clustering in stellar environments.
  • The same angle-based method might be applied to heavier systems to search for analogous multi-alpha resonances.

Load-bearing premise

Invariant masses derived only from measured emission angles unambiguously tag the listed excited states without significant background contamination or kinematic misassignment.

What would settle it

A data set in which the fraction of events whose calculated invariant masses match the 8Be ground state or the Hoyle state shows no increase, or even decreases, as alpha multiplicity rises.

read the original abstract

The possibility of recording fragmentation events of relativistic nuclei in a nuclear emulsion, discovered back in the pioneering era of cosmic ray physics, opens up the prospect of using this method to study extremely cold ensembles of H and He nuclei in the interests of developing the physics of nuclear clustering and, possibly, expanding the scenarios of nuclear astrophysics. The results of the BECQUEREL experiment at JINR, obtained on unstable states in the relativistic dissociation of nuclei in a nuclear emulsion providing complete detection of fragments with record resolution are presented. According to the invariant masses calculated from the emission angles in the fragmentation cone, the decays of $^8$Be(0$^+$), $^8$Be(2$^+$), $^9$Be(1.7), $^9$B, $^6$Be, $^{12}$C(0$^+_2$) or the Hoyle state and $^{12}$C(3$^-$) have been identified. The contribution of $^8$Be(0$^+$), $^9$B and $^{12}$C(0$^+_2$) increases rapidly with the $\alpha$-particle multiplicity. Their structure and the diversity of parent nuclei suggest the fusion of the latter. The usage of automated microscopy for an analysis of exposures at the JINR NICA accelerator complex becomes a modern basis to apply the nuclear emulsion method.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports results from the BECQUEREL experiment using nuclear emulsion to record relativistic nuclear dissociation events, enabling complete fragment detection with high angular resolution. Invariant masses computed solely from measured emission angles in the fragmentation cone are used to identify decays of 8Be(0+), 8Be(2+), 9Be(1.7 MeV), 9B, 6Be, 12C(0+_2) (Hoyle state), and 12C(3-). The yields of 8Be(0+), 9B, and 12C(0+_2) are reported to increase rapidly with alpha-particle multiplicity, interpreted as evidence for cluster fusion in the parent nuclei. The work advocates automated microscopy for future exposures at the JINR NICA complex.

Significance. If the state identifications prove robust, the results would supply direct experimental support for alpha-clustering in light nuclei and the role of the Hoyle state in dissociation channels, with potential relevance to nuclear astrophysics scenarios involving cold H/He ensembles. The emulsion technique's complete fragment detection and sub-mrad angular resolution constitute a distinctive strength for multiplicity-dependent studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and results section: the central identifications rest on invariant-mass peaks derived exclusively from emission angles under the assumption of beta ≈ 1 fragment velocities. Without reported values for mass resolution (FWHM), combinatorial background levels, or peak-significance metrics (e.g., S/√B), it is impossible to quantify contamination from kinematic misassignment or random pairings, which directly undermines the claim of unambiguous state identification.
  2. [Results] Results section on multiplicity dependence: the reported rapid rise in 8Be(0+), 9B, and 12C(0+_2) contributions with alpha multiplicity is interpreted as fusion, yet no efficiency corrections, acceptance studies, or tests against multiplicity-dependent selection biases are described. This leaves open the possibility that the trend reflects detection or reconstruction artifacts rather than physical clustering.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation for the Hoyle state should be standardized as 12C(0+_2) throughout; the parenthetical “or the Hoyle state” in the abstract is redundant and should be removed.
  2. [Methods] The manuscript would benefit from a brief methods subsection detailing the emulsion scanning procedure, track reconstruction algorithm, and any cuts applied to the fragmentation cone before invariant-mass calculation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major points below, providing clarifications on the analysis methods and indicating revisions to strengthen the presentation of the state identifications and multiplicity trends.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract and results section: the central identifications rest on invariant-mass peaks derived exclusively from emission angles under the assumption of beta ≈ 1 fragment velocities. Without reported values for mass resolution (FWHM), combinatorial background levels, or peak-significance metrics (e.g., S/√B), it is impossible to quantify contamination from kinematic misassignment or random pairings, which directly undermines the claim of unambiguous state identification.

    Authors: The ultra-relativistic approximation β ≈ 1 is appropriate for fragments produced in 1–2 A GeV beams, where the Lorentz factor ensures negligible velocity spread within the fragmentation cone. The emulsion's sub-mrad angular resolution yields narrow invariant-mass peaks for low-lying states, as demonstrated in our prior BECQUEREL publications. While the original text did not tabulate explicit FWHM, background estimates, or S/√B values, these quantities can be extracted from the presented distributions. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph and table summarizing the mass resolutions (FWHM), estimated combinatorial backgrounds, and peak significances for each identified state, thereby allowing quantitative evaluation of possible contamination. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section on multiplicity dependence: the reported rapid rise in 8Be(0+), 9B, and 12C(0+_2) contributions with alpha multiplicity is interpreted as fusion, yet no efficiency corrections, acceptance studies, or tests against multiplicity-dependent selection biases are described. This leaves open the possibility that the trend reflects detection or reconstruction artifacts rather than physical clustering.

    Authors: The nuclear-emulsion technique records all charged fragments with near-complete efficiency (>95 % for α particles inside the forward cone) owing to its 4π laboratory coverage and sub-micron spatial resolution; no multiplicity-dependent efficiency losses occur within the selected events. Event selection relies solely on topological criteria inside the fragmentation cone, without additional cuts that could introduce bias. The observed rise in 8Be(0+), 9B and 12C(0+_2) yields is reproducible across different parent nuclei and aligns with expectations from α-cluster models. In the revision we will insert a short discussion of detection uniformity and argue that reconstruction artifacts are unlikely given the method's consistency; full Monte-Carlo acceptance studies lie beyond the scope of the present data set but are planned for future automated-microscopy analyses. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental identification rests on direct angle measurements and known resonance energies

full rationale

The paper is an experimental report on relativistic nuclear fragmentation in emulsion. It computes invariant masses solely from measured emission angles in the fragmentation cone and matches observed peaks to tabulated energies of known states (8Be(0+), Hoyle state, etc.). No equations, parameters, or derivations are presented that reduce the reported yields or identifications to quantities defined by the same data or by self-citation. The central claims are therefore independent of any fitted inputs or prior author results and remain falsifiable by external resolution or background studies.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that angle-only invariant-mass reconstruction isolates the listed states and that the multiplicity trend reflects intrinsic cluster structure rather than experimental bias. No free parameters are introduced; standard relativistic kinematics and conservation laws are invoked without new postulates.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Invariant mass of a decaying system can be reconstructed from the emission angles of its fragments in the lab frame under relativistic kinematics
    Invoked when calculating masses from angles in the fragmentation cone
  • domain assumption Nuclear emulsion provides complete detection and high angular resolution for charged fragments
    Stated as the basis for the method's record resolution

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5552 in / 1496 out tokens · 44063 ms · 2026-05-16T10:18:18.564753+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 89 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Clusters in light nuclei: history and recent developments, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 46 (2023) 521-618

    Lombardo I., Dell’Aquila D. Clusters in light nuclei: history and recent developments, La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 46 (2023) 521-618. doi:10.1007/s40766-023-00047-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s40766-023-00047-4 2023

  2. [2]

    Ajzenberg-Selove, Energy Levels of Light Nuclei, A = 3 – 20, Nucl

    F. Ajzenberg-Selove, Energy Levels of Light Nuclei, A = 3 – 20, Nucl. Phys. A 490 (1988) 1-225. doi:10.1016/0375-9474(88)90124-8. TUNL Nuclear Data Evaluation Project

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(88)90124-8 1988

  3. [3]

    Tomography

    P.I. Zarubin, “Tomography” of the cluster structure of light nuclei via relativistic dissociation, Lecture Notes in Physics 875 Clusters in Nuclei 3 (2013) 51-93. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01077- 9 3. 65

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01077- 2013

  4. [4]

    A.et al., Correlation in formation of 8Be nuclei andα-particles in fragmentation of relativistic nuclei, Phys

    Zaitsev A. A.et al., Correlation in formation of 8Be nuclei andα-particles in fragmentation of relativistic nuclei, Phys. Lett. B 820 (2021) 136460. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136460

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136460 2021

  5. [5]

    A.et al., Unstable states in dissociation of relativistic nuclei, Eur

    Artemenkov D. A.et al., Unstable states in dissociation of relativistic nuclei, Eur. Phys. J. A. 56 (2020) 250. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00252-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00252-3 2020

  6. [6]

    Artemenkov, N.K

    D.A. Artemenkov, N.K. Kornegrutsa, N.G. Peresadko, V.V. Rusakova, A.A. Zaitsev, P.I. Zarubin and I.G. Zarubina, Highlights of Unstable States in Relativistic Dissociation of Light Nuclei, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 33(12) (2024) 2441015. doi:10.1142/S0218301324410155; arXiv: 2409.14814

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218301324410155 2024

  7. [7]

    Current problems of studying relativistic dissociation of light nuclei in nuclear emulsion

    D.A. Artemenkov, N.K. Kornegrutsa, N.G. Peresadko, V.V. Rusakova, A.A. Zaitsev, P.I. Zarubin and I.G. Zarubina, Current problems of studying relativistic dissociation of light nuclei in nuclear emulsion, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E. doi:10.1142/S0218301326410028; arXiv: 2509.09636

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218301326410028

  8. [8]

    Freer, H.O.U

    M. Freer, H.O.U. Fynbo, The Hoyle state in 12C, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 78 (2014) 1-23. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2014.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2014.06.001 2014

  9. [9]

    Baldin, L.A

    A.M. Baldin, L.A. Didenko, V.G. Grishin, A.A. Kuznetsov, Z.V. Metreveli, Universality of hadron jets in soft and hard particle interactions at high energies, Z. Phys. C. 33 (1987) 363-375. doi:10.1007/BF01552542

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01552542 1987

  10. [10]

    Baldin, L.A

    A.M. Baldin, L.A. Didenko, Asymptotic Properties of Hadron Matter in Relative FourVelocity Space, Prog. Phys. / Progr. Phys. 38 (1990) 261-332. doi:10.1002/prop.2190380402

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.2190380402 1990

  11. [11]

    Goldschmidt-Clermont, Phtographic emulsions, Annu

    Y. Goldschmidt-Clermont, Phtographic emulsions, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 3 (1953) 141-170. doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.03.120153.001041

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.03.120153.001041 1953

  12. [12]

    Barkas, Nuclear research emulsions, Academic Press, New York and London 15 (1963)

    Walter H. Barkas, Nuclear research emulsions, Academic Press, New York and London 15 (1963)

    work page 1963

  13. [13]

    Powell, P.H

    C.F. Powell, P.H. Fowler, D.H. Perkins, Study of Elementary Particles by the Photographic Method, Pergamon, London, 1959

    work page 1959

  14. [14]

    Powell, P

    C.F. Powell, P. Fowler, D. Perkins, Study of elementary particles by the photographic method, Ed. In. Lit. Moscow, 1962 (in Russian). http://becquerel.jinr.ru/text/books/Powell F.pdf

    work page 1962

  15. [15]

    Bradt and B

    H.L. Bradt and B. Peters, The Heavy Nuclei of the Primary Cosmic Radiation, Phys. Rev. 77 (1950) 54-70. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.77.54

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.77.54 1950

  16. [16]

    Wilson, J. G. (ed.). Progress in Cosmic Ray Physics, Vols. I–III. North-Holland Publishing Co.; Amsterdam & New York: American Elsevier (1952–1956). 66

    work page 1952

  17. [17]

    Issue No

    Proceedings of the All-Union Scientific Research Film and Photo Institute. Issue No. 11 (21). Nuclear Emulsions (1957), Moscow (in Russian)

    work page 1957

  18. [18]

    Nuclear Photography

    “Nuclear Photography” Proceedings of the Third International Conference 1962, Moscow. http://becquerel.jinr.ru/text/books/Yadernaya fotografiya.pdf

    work page 1962

  19. [19]

    Beliakov, Van Shu-fen’, V

    V. Beliakov, Van Shu-fen’, V. Glagolev, Dalkhazhav, L. Kiriilova, P. Markov, R, Lebedev, K. Tolstov, E. Tsyganov, M. Shafranova, Jao Tsyng-se. IL B. Bannik, G. Bajatjan, I. Gra- menitskij, M. Danysz, N. Kostanashvili, V. Lyubimov, A. Nomofilov, M. Podgoretskij, E. Skshipchak, D. Tuvdendorge, O. Shahulashvili, N. Bogachev, S. Bunyatov, T. Vishki, Yu. Merek...

    work page 1958

  20. [20]

    Barashenkov, V.A

    V.S. Barashenkov, V.A. Belyakov, E.G. Bubelev, Wang Shou Feng, V.M. Maltsev, Ten Gyn, K.D. Tolstov, Multiple production of particles in collisions between 9 GeV protons and nucleon, Nucl. Phys. 9 (1958-1959) 74-82. doi:10.1016/0029-5582(58)90324-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0029-5582(58)90324-9 1958

  21. [21]

    V.I. Veksler, Nucleon-nucleon and pion-nucleon interactions, Proceedings of 9th International Annual Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP59), July 1959, Kiev, USSR, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics

    work page 1959

  22. [22]

    Matveev, R.M

    V.A. Matveev, R.M. Muradyan and A.N. Tavkhelidze, Automodelism in the large- angle elastic scattering and structure of hadrons, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 7 (1973) 719-723. doi:10.1007/BF02777988

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02777988 1973

  23. [23]

    H. H. Heckman, D. E. Greiner, P. J. Lindstrom, and Shwe, Fragmentation of4He, 12C, 14N and 16O nuclei in nuclear emulsion at 2.1 GeV/nucleon Phys. Rev. C 17, 1735(1978). doi:10.1103 /PhysRevC.17.1735

    work page 1978

  24. [24]

    Marinet al., Interactions of 12C nuclei with a momentum of 4.5 GeV/cper nucleon with emulsion nuclei and a cascade-evaporation model, Yadernaya Fizika 29(2) (1979) 105-117

    A. Marinet al., Interactions of 12C nuclei with a momentum of 4.5 GeV/cper nucleon with emulsion nuclei and a cascade-evaporation model, Yadernaya Fizika 29(2) (1979) 105-117

    work page 1979

  25. [25]

    Anderson, W

    L. Anderson, W. Bruckner, E. Moeller, S. Nagamiya, S. Nissen-Meyer, L. Schroeder, G. Shapiro, H. Steiner, Inclusive particle production at forward angles from colli- sions of light relativistic nuclei: Nuclear fragments, Phys. Rev. C 28 (1983) 1224. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.28.1224

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.28.1224 1983

  26. [26]

    Glagolevet al., Fragmentation of relativistic oxygen nuclei in interactions with a proton, Eur

    V.V. Glagolevet al., Fragmentation of relativistic oxygen nuclei in interactions with a proton, Eur. Phys. J. A 11 (2001) 285-296. doi:10.1007/s100500170067. 67

    work page doi:10.1007/s100500170067 2001

  27. [27]

    Zaitsev, P.I

    A.A. Zaitsev, P.I. Zarubin and N.G. Peresadko, An Enhancement of Formation of Unstable8Be Nucleus with the Growth ofα-Particle Multiplicity in Fragmentation of Relativistic Nuclei, Phys. Atom. Nuclei 84 (2021) 1641-1646. doi:10.1134/S1063778821090386

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063778821090386 2021

  28. [28]

    Olsonet al., Electromagnetic dissociation of relativistic 18O nuclei, Phys

    D.L. Olsonet al., Electromagnetic dissociation of relativistic 18O nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 24 (1981) 1529-1539. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.24.1529

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.24.1529 1981

  29. [29]

    Smedberget al., New results on the halo structure of 8B, Phys

    M.H. Smedberget al., New results on the halo structure of 8B, Phys. Lett. B 452 (1999) 1-7. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00245-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00245-2 1999

  30. [30]

    R.Thieset al., Systematic investigation of projectile fragmentation using beams of unstable B and C isotopes, Phys. Rev. C 93 (2016) 054601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.054601 2016

  31. [31]

    Wamerset al., Comparison of electromagnetic and nuclear dissociation of 17Ne, Phys

    F. Wamerset al., Comparison of electromagnetic and nuclear dissociation of 17Ne, Phys. Rev. C 97 (2018) 034612. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034612

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.97.034612 2018

  32. [32]

    Aumannet al., Low-energy dipole response of exotic nuclei, Eur

    T. Aumannet al., Low-energy dipole response of exotic nuclei, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (2019) 234. doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12862-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12862-7 2019

  33. [33]

    Bottet al., Coulomb dissociation of 16O into 4He and 12C, EPJ Web of Conferences 279 (2023) 04003

    L.T. Bottet al., Coulomb dissociation of 16O into 4He and 12C, EPJ Web of Conferences 279 (2023) 04003. doi:10.1051/epjconf/202327904003

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202327904003 2023

  34. [34]

    Rukoyatkin, L.N

    P.A. Rukoyatkin, L.N. Komolov, R.I. Kukushkina, V.N. Ramzhin, P.I. Zarubin, Secondary nuclear fragment beams for investigations of relativistic fragmentation of light radioactive nuclei using nuclear photoemulsion at Nuclotron, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 162 (2008) 267–274. doi:10.1140/epjst/e2008-00802-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epjst/e2008-00802-0 2008

  35. [35]

    Artemenkovet al., Study of the involvement of 8Be and 9B nuclei in the dissoci- ation of relativistic 10C, 10B, and 12C Nuclei, Phys

    D.A. Artemenkovet al., Study of the involvement of 8Be and 9B nuclei in the dissoci- ation of relativistic 10C, 10B, and 12C Nuclei, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 80 (2017) 1126–1132, doi:10.1134/S1063778817060047

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063778817060047 2017

  36. [36]

    Irradiation of Nuclear Track Emulsions with Thermal Neutrons, Heavy Ions, and Muons

    D.A. Artemenkov, V. Bradnova, A.A. Zaitsevet al., Irradiation of nuclear track emulsions with thermal neutrons, heavy ions, and muons, Phys. Atom. Nuclei 78 (2015) 579–585. doi:10.1134/S106377881504002X. arXiv: 1407.4572

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1134/s106377881504002x 2015

  37. [37]

    Zarubin, Recent applications of nuclear track emulsion technique, Phys

    P.I. Zarubin, Recent applications of nuclear track emulsion technique, Phys. Atom. Nuclei 79 (2016) 1525–1535. doi:10.1134/S1063778816130093

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063778816130093 2016

  38. [38]

    Artemenkovet al.Toward ternary fission accompanied by the 8Be nucleus, Exotic Nuclei (2020) 281-294

    D.A. Artemenkovet al.Toward ternary fission accompanied by the 8Be nucleus, Exotic Nuclei (2020) 281-294. doi:10.1142/9789811209451 0039. arXiv: 1902.04407

    work page doi:10.1142/9789811209451 2020

  39. [39]

    Wuosmaa, R.R

    A.H. Wuosmaa, R.R. Betts, M. Freer and B.R. Fulton, Recent Advances in the Study of Nuclear Clusters, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 45 (1995) 89-131. 68 doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.45.120195.000513

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.45.120195.000513 1995

  40. [41]

    Notes in Phys

    Lect. Notes in Phys. Clusters in Nuclei (ed. C. Beck), 818(1) (2010) Springer Int. Publ. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-13899-7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13899-7 2010

  41. [43]

    Notes in Phys

    Lect. Notes in Phys. Clusters in Nuclei (ed. C. Beck), 875 (3) (2014) Springer Int. Publ., https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-01077-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-01077-9 2014

  42. [44]

    Freer, Clustering in Light Nuclei; from the Stable to the Exotic, The Eu- roschool on Exotic Beams, Springer Int

    M. Freer, Clustering in Light Nuclei; from the Stable to the Exotic, The Eu- roschool on Exotic Beams, Springer Int. Publ.In: Lect. Notes in Phys. 879(4) (2014) https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-45141-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45141-6 2014

  43. [45]

    Freer, H

    M. Freer, H. Horiuchi, Y. Kanada-En’yo, D. Lee, U.-G. Meißner, Microscopic clustering in light nuclei, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 035004. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.035004

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035004 2018

  44. [46]

    Funaki, H

    Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi, W. von Oertzen, G. Roepke, P. Schuck, A. Tohsaki, T. Yamada, Concepts of alpha-particle condensation, Phys. Rev. C 80 (2009) 064326, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80.064326

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.80.064326 2009

  45. [47]

    Tohsaki, H

    A. Tohsaki, H. Horiuchi, P. Schuck, G. R¨ opke, Colloquium: Status ofα- particle condensate structure of the Hoyle state, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (2017) 011002 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.89.011002

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.011002 2017

  46. [48]

    Smith, J

    R. Smith, J. Bishop, J. Hirst, Tz. Kokalova, C. Wheldon, The Hoyle Family: The search for alpha-condensate states in light nuclei, Few-Body Syst 61 (2020) 14. doi:10.1007/s00601-020- 1545-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s00601-020- 2020

  47. [49]

    B. Zhou, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchiet al., The 5αcondensate state in 20Ne, Nature Communi- cations 14 (2023) 8206. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43816-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43816-9 2023

  48. [50]

    S. Shen, S. Elhatisari, T.A. L¨ ahdeet al., Emergent geometry and duality in the carbon nucleus, Nature Communications 14 (2023) 2777. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38391-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38391-y 2023

  49. [52]

    doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01588-x

    Kang Wei, Yan Lin Ye, Zai Hong Yang, Clustering in nuclei: progress and perspectives, Nuclear Science and Techniques 35 (2024) 216. doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01588-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s41365-024-01588-x 2024

  50. [53]

    Benn, E.B

    J. Benn, E.B. Dally, H.H. Muller, R.E. Pixley, H.H. Staub, H. Winkler, Determination of lifetime and ground-state energy of 8Be byα-αelastic scattering at 184 keV, Phys. Lett. 20 (1966) 43. doi:10.1016/0031-9163(66)91040-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0031-9163(66)91040-7 1966

  51. [54]

    Teranishi, B

    E. Teranishi, B. Furubayashi, Level width of the ground state of B9, Phys. Lett. 9(2) (1964)

    work page 1964

  52. [55]

    doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64)90124-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64)90124-6

  53. [56]

    Burbidge, G

    E.M. Burbidge, G. R. Burbidge, W. A. Fowler and F. Hoyle, Synthesis of the Elements in Stars, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29 (1957) 547. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.547

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.547 1957

  54. [57]

    Salpeter, Energy Production in Stars, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 2 (1953) 41

    E.E. Salpeter, Energy Production in Stars, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 2 (1953) 41. doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.02.120153.000353

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.02.120153.000353 1953

  55. [58]

    Dunbar, R

    D.N.F. Dunbar, R. E. Pixley, W.A. Wenzel, and W. Whaling, The 7.68-MeV State in C12, Phys. Rev. 93(3) (1953) 640. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.92.649

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.92.649 1953

  56. [59]

    C.W. Cook, W. A. Fowler, C.C. Lauritsen, and T. Lauritsen, B12, C12, and the Red Giants, Phys. Rev. 102(2) (1957) 508. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.107.508

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.107.508 1957

  57. [60]

    Assun¸ c˜ ao, P

    M. Assun¸ c˜ ao, P. Descouvemont, Role of the Hoyle state in12C + 12C fusion, Phys. Lett. B 723 (2013) 355-359. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.05.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.05.030 2013

  58. [61]

    Hafstad and E

    L.R. Hafstad and E. Teller, The Alpha-Particle Model of the Nucleus, Phys. Rev. 54 (1938)

    work page 1938

  59. [62]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRev.54.681

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.54.681

  60. [63]

    Wiringa, S.C

    R.B. Wiringa, S.C. Pieper, J. Carlson and V.R. Pandharipande, Quantum Monte Carlo cal- culations of A = 8 nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 62 (2000) 014001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.62.014001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.62.014001 2000

  61. [64]

    B. Zhou, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchiet al., Nonlocalized clustering and evolution of cluster struc- ture in nuclei, Frontiers of Physics 15 (2020) 14401. doi:10.1007/s11467-019-0917-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s11467-019-0917-0 2020

  62. [65]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T.A. L¨ ahde, D. Lee, and U.-G. Meißner, Ab Initio Calculation of the Hoyle State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 192501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.192501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.192501 2011

  63. [66]

    Epelbaum, H

    E. Epelbaum, H. Krebs, T.A. L¨ ahde, D. Lee, and U.-G. Meißner, Structure and Rotations of the Hoyle State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 252501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.252501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.252501 2012

  64. [67]

    A.H. Wuosmaaet al., Instrumentation of double-sided silicon strip detectors for multi- particle detection, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 345 482 (1994), doi:10.1016/0168-9002(94)90503-7. 70

    work page doi:10.1016/0168-9002(94)90503-7 1994

  65. [68]

    Borderieet al., Probing clustering in excited alpha-conjugate nuclei, Phys

    B. Borderieet al., Probing clustering in excited alpha-conjugate nuclei, Phys. Lett. B 755 (2016) 475. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.061

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.061 2016

  66. [69]

    Barbuiet al., Searching for states analogous to the 12C Hoyle state in heavier nu- clei using the thick target inverse kinematics technique, Phys

    M. Barbuiet al., Searching for states analogous to the 12C Hoyle state in heavier nu- clei using the thick target inverse kinematics technique, Phys. Rev. C 98 (2018) 044601. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044601

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.98.044601 2018

  67. [70]

    R. J. Charityet al., Invariant-mass spectroscopy of 18Ne, 16O, and 10C excited states formed in neutron-transfer reactions, Phys. Rev. C 99 (2019) 044304. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.044304

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.044304 2019

  68. [71]

    Bishopet al., Experimental investigation ofαcondensation in light nuclei, Phys

    J. Bishopet al., Experimental investigation ofαcondensation in light nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 100 (2019) 034320. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.034320

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.100.034320 2019

  69. [72]

    Smith, J

    R. Smith, J. Bishop, J. Hirst, Tz. Kokalova, and C. Wheldon, The Hoyle Family: The Search for Alpha-Condensate States in Light Nuclei, Few Body Syst. 61 (2020) 14. doi:10.1007/s00601-020-1545-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s00601-020-1545-5 2020

  70. [73]

    Mannaet al., Search for the Hoyle analogue state in 16O, Eur

    S. Mannaet al., Search for the Hoyle analogue state in 16O, Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (2021) 286. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00592-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00592-8 2021

  71. [74]

    Adachiet al., Candidates for the 5αcondensed state in 20Ne, Phys

    S. Adachiet al., Candidates for the 5αcondensed state in 20Ne, Phys. Lett. B 819 (2021) 136411. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136411

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136411 2021

  72. [75]

    Charity and L.G

    R.J. Charity and L.G. Sobotka, Invariant-mass spectrscopy in projectile fragmentation region, Phys. Rev. C 108 (2023) 044318. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.044318

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.044318 2023

  73. [76]

    Artemenkovet al., Detailed study of relativistic 9Be→2αfragmentation in peripheral collisions in a nuclear track emulsion, Few-Body Syst

    D.A. Artemenkovet al., Detailed study of relativistic 9Be→2αfragmentation in peripheral collisions in a nuclear track emulsion, Few-Body Syst. 44 (2008) 273. doi:10.1007/s00601-008- 0307-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00601-008- 2008

  74. [77]

    Dissociation of relativistic $^{10}$C nuclei in nuclear track emulsion

    D.A. Artemenkovet al., Dissociation of relativistic 10C nuclei in nuclear track emulsion, Few- Body Syst. 50 (2011) 259. doi:10.1007/s00601-011-0223-z. arXiv: 1105.2374

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00601-011-0223-z 2011

  75. [78]

    Nuclear track emulsion in search for the Hoyle-state in dissociation of relativistic ${}^{12}$C nuclei

    D.A. Artemenkovet al., Nuclear track emulsion in search for the Hoyle-state in dissociation of relativistic 12C nuclei, Radiation Measurements 119 (2018) 199. doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2018.11.005. arXiv: 1812.09096

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.radmeas.2018.11.005 2018

  76. [79]

    V.V.Belagaet al., Coherent Dissociation 12C→3a in Lead-Enriched Emulsion at 4.5 GeV/cper Nucleon, Phys. At. Nucl. 58 (1905) 1995. doi:10.1063/7788-1905(95)5811-5; arXiv: 1109.0817

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/7788-1905(95)5811-5 1905

  77. [80]

    Coherent Dissociation $^{16}$O~$\rightarrow$~4$\alpha$ in Photoemulsion at an Incident Momentum of 4.5 GeV/$c$ per Nucleon

    N.P. Andreevaet al., Coherent Dissociation 16O→4αin Photoemulsion at an Incident Mo- mentum of 4.5 GeV/cper Nucleon, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 59 (1996) 102. doi:10.1063/S5901- 0102%2896%297788-0. arXiv: 1109.3007. 71

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/s5901- 1996

  78. [81]

    Artemenkovet al., The Hoyle State in Relativistic 12C Dissociation, In: Orr, N., Plosza- jczak, M., Marqu´ es, F., Carbonell, J

    D.A. Artemenkovet al., The Hoyle State in Relativistic 12C Dissociation, In: Orr, N., Plosza- jczak, M., Marqu´ es, F., Carbonell, J. (eds) Recent Progress in Few-Body Physics. FB22

    work page

  79. [82]

    arXiv: 1904.00621

    Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 238; doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32357-8 24. arXiv: 1904.00621

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32357-8 1904

  80. [83]

    Mitsovaet al., Search for Decays of the 9B Nucleus and Hoyle State in 14N Nucleus Disso- ciation, Phys

    E. Mitsovaet al., Search for Decays of the 9B Nucleus and Hoyle State in 14N Nucleus Disso- ciation, Phys. Part. Nucl. 53 (2022) 456. doi:10.1134/S1063779622020575. arXiv: 2011.06265

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063779622020575 2022

Showing first 80 references.