pith. sign in

arxiv: 2601.21438 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-29 · 🌀 gr-qc

Analytic Solution for the Motion of Spinning Particles in Plane Gravitational Wave Spacetime

Ke Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 09:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equationsplane gravitational wavesspinning particlesanalytic solutionsKilling symmetriesconserved quantitiesspin-curvature couplingretarded time integrals
0
0 comments X

The pith

Six conserved quantities from Killing symmetries fully determine the analytic motion of spinning particles in plane gravitational waves.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives analytic solutions to the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations for spinning particles at linear order in spin, restricted to plane gravitational wave backgrounds. It combines a parallel-transported tetrad with the exact translational Killing vectors of these spacetimes to produce six conserved quantities that fix the four-momentum, spin tensor, and worldline. The transverse and longitudinal displacements then reduce to single integrals over retarded time. This supplies a model-independent description of spin-curvature forces that cause deviations from geodesic motion, relevant for gravitational memory, Penrose limits, and scattering calculations.

Core claim

The Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations truncated at linear spin order admit closed-form solutions in plane wave spacetimes. A parallel-transported tetrad aligned with the wave propagation direction, together with the spacetime's translational Killing symmetries, generates six conserved quantities. These quantities determine the momentum and spin evolution completely, while the particle's position components are expressed as explicit integrals of the wave profile evaluated at retarded time.

What carries the argument

Parallel-transported tetrad combined with translational Killing symmetries, which generate the six conserved quantities that close the linear-order MPD system.

If this is right

  • Transverse and longitudinal motions reduce to single retarded-time integrals of the wave amplitude.
  • Spin-induced deviations from geodesics become computable without solving differential equations numerically.
  • The same conserved quantities apply uniformly to gravitational memory, Penrose-limit geometries, and high-energy scattering.
  • The framework supplies a model-independent baseline for any spin-curvature effect linear in spin.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The conserved quantities may serve as exact initial conditions for numerical evolutions in nearby, non-plane-wave spacetimes.
  • Extensions to quadratic spin order or to wave profiles with slower fall-off could be checked by comparing against known geodesic limits.
  • The integral expressions could be used to compute accumulated phase shifts in interferometers or timing arrays that involve spinning sources.

Load-bearing premise

The Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations remain accurate when kept only to first order in the particle spin.

What would settle it

Numerical integration of the full nonlinear MPD equations for a concrete plane-wave profile and initial spin four-vector that produces a trajectory differing from the analytic integral expressions already at linear order in spin.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2601.21438 by Ke Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Evolution of the coordinate components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Evolution of the transverse momentum components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The interaction between spin and gravitational waves causes spinning bodies to deviate from their geodesics. In this work, we obtain the analytic solution of the Mathisson--Papapetrou--Dixon equations at linear order in the spin for plane gravitational wave spacetimes. Our approach combines a parallel-transported tetrad with the translational Killing symmetries of plane wave spacetimes, yielding six conserved quantities that fully determine the momentum, spin evolution, and worldline. The resulting transverse and longitudinal motions are expressed in closed form as single integrals of the retarded time, providing a unified and model-independent framework for computing spin--curvature-induced deviations. This analytic solution offers a versatile tool for studying spin-dependent effects in gravitational memory, Penrose-limit geometries, and high-energy scattering regimes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper derives an analytic solution to the Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations at linear order in spin for test particles in exact plane gravitational wave spacetimes. By constructing a parallel-transported tetrad and exploiting the translational Killing vectors of the plane-wave background, six conserved quantities are obtained that reduce the momentum, spin, and worldline evolution to single integrals over retarded time u, yielding closed-form expressions for transverse and longitudinal motions without additional approximations beyond the linear-spin truncation.

Significance. If correct, the result supplies a model-independent analytic framework for spin-curvature deviations in plane-wave geometries, which is useful for gravitational memory effects, Penrose limits, and high-energy scattering. The derivation relies on standard, well-defined constructions (Killing conserved quantities and linear MPD truncation) applied directly to the exact metric, providing reproducible quadratures rather than numerical integration.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states that the six conserved quantities 'fully determine' the dynamics but does not list them explicitly; adding a short enumeration (e.g., p·k, S·k, etc.) would improve immediate readability.
  2. The integration for the worldline coordinates is described as 'single integrals over retarded time u'; the manuscript should display the explicit integral expressions for x^μ(u) in a dedicated equation block to facilitate direct use by readers.
  3. Notation for the plane-wave metric (Brinkmann vs. Rosen form) and the choice of parallel-transported tetrad should be introduced with a brief reminder of the coordinate conventions in §2 before the conserved quantities are derived.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation applies standard Killing symmetries and tetrad construction without reduction to self-inputs

full rationale

The paper obtains the analytic solution to the linear-spin MPD equations by exploiting the exact translational Killing vectors of plane-wave spacetimes together with a parallel-transported tetrad. These yield six first integrals that reduce the system to quadratures. Both the Killing conserved quantities and the linear-spin truncation are standard, externally defined constructions that do not depend on the target solution or on any fitted parameters from the present work. No equation is shown to be equivalent to its own inputs by construction, and no load-bearing step relies on a self-citation chain. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations truncated at linear spin order and on the existence of translational Killing symmetries in plane-wave spacetimes; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Mathisson-Papapetrou-Dixon equations truncated at linear order in spin
    Standard equations for spinning test particles in general relativity invoked throughout the derivation.
  • standard math Plane gravitational wave spacetimes admit translational Killing vectors
    Geometric property of the background metric used to generate the six conserved quantities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5421 in / 1378 out tokens · 24372 ms · 2026-05-16T09:56:37.052638+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    into a parallel–transported pair. We therefore define eµ 2 = ˜eµ 2 cosψ(u)−˜e µ 3 sinψ(u),(21) eµ 3 = ˜eµ 2 sinψ(u) + ˜eµ 3 cosψ(u),(22) and require that the parallel–transport conditions uν g ∇νeµ 2 = 0, u ν g ∇νeµ 3 = 0 (23) hold along the reference geodesicu µ g . A direct computation by expanding ˜e3 µuν g ∇νeµ 2 = 0 yields the simple evolution equati...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Using the metric (9) and dividingu µuµ =−1 by (u u)2 we find 2 dv du + (1−h +) dy du 2 + (1 +h +) dz du 2 −2h × dy du dz du =− m E 2 .(43) In terms of the Cartesian coordinatex,dx/du=−(1 +dv/du)/ √

    work page

  3. [3]

    To obtain a concrete worldline, the constants (E, J α, Jβ, s∥, sα, sβ) must be fixed by specifying initial conditions at u= 0

    By integrating once, we obtain x(u) =x(0)− u√ 2 + 1 2 √ 2 Z u 0 du′ " (1−h +(u′)) dy du′ 2 + (1 +h +(u′)) dz du′ 2 −2h ×(u′) dy du′ dz du′ + m E 2 # .(44) Equations (41), (42) and (44) provide the completeO(s) worldline of the spinning test particle in the plane gravitational wave spacetime. To obtain a concrete worldline, the constants (E, J α, Jβ, s∥, s...

    work page

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA.Living Rev. Rel., 19:1, 2016. doi:10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9. VI

    work page doi:10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9 2016

  5. [5]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Pau Amaro-Seoane et al. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. 2 2017. I, VI

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Andrzejewski

    K. Andrzejewski. Revisiting the dynamics of a charged spinning body in curved spacetime.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 42(5):055019, March 2025. ISSN 0264-9381, 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adb2d4. URLhttp://arxiv.org/ abs/2405.13784. arXiv:2405.13784 [gr-qc]. I

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adb2d4 2025

  7. [7]

    Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems, post-Minkowskian approximation and effective one-body theory.Phys

    Donato Bini and Thibault Damour. Gravitational spin-orbit coupling in binary systems, post-Minkowskian approximation and effective one-body theory.Phys. Rev. D, 96(10):104038, 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.104038. I

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.104038 2017

  8. [8]

    Gyroscopes and gravitational waves.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 17(22):4627– 4635, November 2000

    Donato Bini and Fernando De Felice. Gyroscopes and gravitational waves.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 17(22):4627– 4635, November 2000. ISSN 0264-9381, 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/22/303. URLhttps://iopscience.iop. org/article/10.1088/0264-9381/17/22/303. I

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/22/303 2000

  9. [9]

    Dietrich, T

    Donato Bini, Christian Cherubini, Andrea Geralico, and Antonello Ortolan. Dixon’s extended bodies and weak gravitational waves.General Relativity and Gravitation, 41(1):105–116, January 2009. ISSN 0001-7701, 1572-9532. doi:10.1007/s10714- 008-0657-x. URLhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10714-008-0657-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714- 2009

  10. [10]

    Deviation and precession effects in the field of a weak gravitational wave

    Donato Bini, Andrea Geralico, and Antonello Ortolan. Deviation and precession effects in the field of a weak gravitational wave.Physical Review D, 95(10):104044, May 2017. ISSN 2470-0010, 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.104044. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02794. arXiv:1705.02794 [gr-qc]. I

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.104044 2017

  11. [11]

    Antonelliet al.(FENICE Collaboration), Nucl

    Matthias Blau and Martin O’Loughlin. Homogeneous plane waves.Nucl. Phys. B, 654:135–176, 2003. doi:10.1016/S0550- 3213(03)00055-5. I, IV A, VI

    work page doi:10.1016/s0550- 2003

  12. [12]

    Bondi, M

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg, and A. W. K. Metzner. Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 269:21–52, 1962. doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.0161. VI

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.0161 1962

  13. [13]

    Higher order analysis of the gravitational wave velocity memory effect between two free-falling gyroscopes in the plane wave spacetime.Phys

    Yingxin Chen, Ke Wang, and Chao-Jun Feng. Higher order analysis of the gravitational wave velocity memory effect between two free-falling gyroscopes in the plane wave spacetime.Phys. Rev. D, 111(10):104085, 2025. doi:10.1103/38k7- pwlr. I, VI

    work page doi:10.1103/38k7- 2025

  14. [14]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    Monica Colpi et al. LISA Definition Study Report. 2 2024. I, VI

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Filipe O

    L. Filipe O. Costa, Georgios Lukes-Gerakopoulos, and Oldˇ rich Semer´ ak. Spinning particles in general relativ- ity: Momentum-velocity relation for the Mathisson-Pirani spin condition.Phys. Rev. D, 97(8):084023, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.97.084023. I

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.084023 2018

  16. [16]

    Interpreting Binary Neutron Star Mergers: Describing the Binary Neutron Star Dynamics, Modelling Gravitational Waveforms, and Analyzing Detections.Gen

    Tim Dietrich, Tanja Hinderer, and Anuradha Samajdar. Interpreting Binary Neutron Star Mergers: Describing the Binary Neutron Star Dynamics, Modelling Gravitational Waveforms, and Analyzing Detections.Gen. Rel. Grav., 53(3):27, 2021. doi:10.1007/s10714-020-02751-6. I

    work page doi:10.1007/s10714-020-02751-6 2021

  17. [17]

    W. G. Dixon. Dynamics of extended bodies in general relativity. I. Momentum and angular momentum.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 314(1519):499–527, January 1970. ISSN 0080-4630. doi:10.1098/rspa.1970.0020. URLhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1970.0020. I, II, II, II

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1970.0020 1970

  18. [18]

    Albert Einstein and N. Rosen. On Gravitational waves.J. Franklin Inst., 223:43–54, 1937. doi:10.1016/S0016- 0032(37)90583-0. III

    work page doi:10.1016/s0016- 1937

  19. [19]

    C. W. F. Everitt, D. B. DeBra, B. W. Parkinson, J. P. Turneaure, J. W. Conklin, M. I. Heifetz, G. M. Keiser, A. S. Silbergleit, T. Holmes, J. Kolodziejczak, M. Al-Meshari, J. C. Mester, B. Muhlfelder, V. G. Solomonik, K. Stahl, P. W. Worden, W. Bencze, S. Buchman, B. Clarke, A. Al-Jadaan, H. Al-Jibreen, J. Li, J. A. Lipa, J. M. Lockhart, B. Al- Suwaidan, ...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.221101 2011

  20. [20]

    Scattering of quantum particles by gravitational plane waves.Phys

    Jaume Garriga and Enric Verdaguer. Scattering of quantum particles by gravitational plane waves.Phys. Rev. D, 43: 391–401, 1991. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.391. I

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.391 1991

  21. [21]

    Abraham I. Harte. Extended-body motion in black hole spacetimes: What is possible?Physical Review D, 102(12): 124075, December 2020. ISSN 2470-0010, 2470-0029. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.124075. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/ 2011.00110. arXiv:2011.00110 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.124075 2020

  22. [22]

    Kessari, D

    S. Kessari, D. Singh, R. W. Tucker, and C. Wang. Scattering of spinning test particles by plane gravitational and electromagnetic waves.Class. Quant. Grav., 19:4943–4952, 2002. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/19/312. I

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/19/312 2002

  23. [23]

    2016, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33, 035010, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010

    Jun Luo et al. TianQin: a space-borne gravitational wave detector.Class. Quant. Grav., 33(3):035010, 2016. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010. I, VI

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/3/035010 2016

  24. [24]

    Parallel-tetrad on null geodesics in Kerr-Newman space-time.Physics Letters A, 97(4):140–142, Au- gust 1983

    Jean-Alain Marck. Parallel-tetrad on null geodesics in Kerr-Newman space-time.Physics Letters A, 97(4):140–142, Au- gust 1983. ISSN 03759601. doi:10.1016/0375-9601(83)90197-4. URLhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ 0375960183901974. IV 11

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(83)90197-4 1983

  25. [25]

    Gravitational waves and spinning test particles

    M. Mohseni and H. R. Sepangi. Gravitational waves and spinning test particles.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 17(22): 4615–4625, November 2000. ISSN 0264-9381, 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/22/302. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/ gr-qc/0009070. arXiv:gr-qc/0009070. I

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/22/302 2000

  26. [26]

    On the motion of spinning test particles in plane gravitational waves

    M. Mohseni, Robin W. Tucker, and Charles Wang. On the motion of spinning test particles in plane gravitational waves.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 18(15):3007–3017, August 2001. ISSN 0264-9381, 1361-6382. doi:10.1088/0264- 9381/18/15/314. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0308042. arXiv:gr-qc/0308042. I

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264- 2001

  27. [27]

    Multipolar Effective-One-Body Waveforms for Precessing Binary Black Holes: Construction and Validation.Phys

    Serguei Ossokine et al. Multipolar Effective-One-Body Waveforms for Precessing Binary Black Holes: Construction and Validation.Phys. Rev. D, 102(4):044055, 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.044055. VI

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.044055 2020

  28. [28]

    Spinning test particles in general relativity

    Achille Papapetrou. Spinning test particles in general relativity. 1.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 209:248–258, 1951. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1951.0200. I, II

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1951.0200 1951

  29. [29]

    Any Space-Time has a Plane Wave as a Limit.Differential Geometry and Relativity, pages 271–275, 1976

    Roger Penrose. Any Space-Time has a Plane Wave as a Limit.Differential Geometry and Relativity, pages 271–275, 1976. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1508-0-23. I, VI

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-010-1508-0-23 1976

  30. [30]

    The motion of point particles in curved spacetime

    Eric Poisson, Adam Pound, and Ian Vega. The motion of point particles in curved spacetime.Living Reviews in Relativity, 14(1):7, December 2011. ISSN 2367-3613, 1433-8351. doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-7. URLhttp://arxiv.org/abs/1102.0529. arXiv:1102.0529 [gr-qc]. II

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.12942/lrr-2011-7 2011

  31. [31]

    2020, International Journal of Modern Physics A, 35, 2050075, doi: 10.1142/S0217751X2050075X

    Wen-Hong Ruan, Zong-Kuan Guo, Rong-Gen Cai, and Yuan-Zhong Zhang. Taiji program: Gravitational-wave sources. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 35(17):2050075, 2020. doi:10.1142/S0217751X2050075X. I, VI

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x2050075x 2020

  32. [32]

    R. Rudiger. Conserved quantities of spinning test particles in general relativity. I.Proceedings of the Royal Society of Lon- don. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 375(1761):185–193, March 1981. ISSN 0080-4630. doi:10.1098/rspa.1981.0046. URLhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1981.0046. II

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1981.0046 1981

  33. [33]

    R. Rudiger. Conserved quantities of spinning test particles in general relativity. II.Proceedings of the Royal So- ciety of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 385(1788):229–239, January 1983. ISSN 0080-4630. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1983.0012. URLhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.1983.0012. II

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1983.0012 1983

  34. [34]

    R. Sachs. Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory.Phys. Rev., 128:2851–2864, 1962. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.128.2851. VI

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.128.2851 1962

  35. [35]

    O. Semerak. Spinning test particles in a Kerr field – I.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 308(3):863–875, September 1999. ISSN 0035-8711, 1365-2966. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02754.x. URLhttps://academic.oup.com/ mnras/article/308/3/863/973826. I

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02754.x 1999

  36. [36]

    Precession Caused by Gravitational Waves.Phys

    Ali Seraj and Blagoje Oblak. Precession Caused by Gravitational Waves.Phys. Rev. Lett., 129(6):061101, 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.061101. I, VI

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.061101 2022

  37. [37]

    Spinning test body orbiting around a Kerr black hole: Eccen- tric equatorial orbits and their asymptotic gravitational-wave fluxes.Phys

    Viktor Skoup´ y and Georgios Lukes-Gerakopoulos. Spinning test body orbiting around a Kerr black hole: Eccen- tric equatorial orbits and their asymptotic gravitational-wave fluxes.Phys. Rev. D, 103(10):104045, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104045. I

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.104045 2021

  38. [38]

    Analytic Solution for the Motion of Spinning Particles in Kerr Spacetime.Physical Review Letters, 134(17):171401, April 2025

    Viktor Skoup´ y and Vojtˇ ech Witzany. Analytic Solution for the Motion of Spinning Particles in Kerr Spacetime.Physical Review Letters, 134(17):171401, April 2025. ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.171401. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.171401. I, IV

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.171401 2025

  39. [39]

    Chaos in Schwarzschild space-time: The motion of a spinning particle.Phys

    Shingo Suzuki and Kei-ichi Maeda. Chaos in Schwarzschild space-time: The motion of a spinning particle.Phys. Rev. D, 55:4848–4859, 1997. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.4848. I

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.4848 1997

  40. [40]

    K. P. Tod, F. de Felice, and M. Calvani. Spinning test particles in the field of a black hole.Nuovo Cim. B, 34:365, 1976. doi:10.1007/BF02728614. II

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02728614 1976

  41. [41]

    Tulczyjew

    W. Tulczyjew. Motion of multipole particles in general relativity theory.Acta Phys.Polon., 18:393, 1959. II

    work page 1959

  42. [42]

    Spin vector deviation and the gravitational wave memory effect between two free-falling gyroscopes in the plane wave spacetimes.Phys

    Ke Wang and Chao-Jun Feng. Spin vector deviation and the gravitational wave memory effect between two free-falling gyroscopes in the plane wave spacetimes.Phys. Rev. D, 107(8):084044, 2023. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.084044. I, VI

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.084044 2023

  43. [43]

    Geometric deformation and redshift structure caused by plane gravitational waves.Phys

    Ke Wang and Chao-Jun Feng. Geometric deformation and redshift structure caused by plane gravitational waves.Phys. Lett. B, 855:138875, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138875. III A, III A

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138875 2024

  44. [44]

    Analytic Solutions for the Motion of Spinning Particles near Spherically Symmetric Black Holes and Exotic Compact Objects.Physical Review Letters, 132(17):171401, April 2024

    Vojtˇ ech Witzany and Gabriel Andres Piovano. Analytic Solutions for the Motion of Spinning Particles near Spherically Symmetric Black Holes and Exotic Compact Objects.Physical Review Letters, 132(17):171401, April 2024. ISSN 0031-9007, 1079-7114. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.171401. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.171401. I, VI

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.171401 2024