A Toy Model for the Cycle Rank Dependence of Stretch at Break in Phantom Chain Network Simulations

Yuichi Masubuchi

arxiv: 2601.22641 · v2 · submitted 2026-01-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

A Toy Model for the Cycle Rank Dependence of Stretch at Break in Phantom Chain Network Simulations

Yuichi Masubuchi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 09:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft

keywords polymer networksstretch at breakcycle rank densitytoy modelphantom chainrupturenetwork topologyspring model

0 comments

The pith

A toy model of alternating springs derives the stretch at break in polymer networks as λ_b-1 proportional to (3ξ+6)/(3ξ+2) where ξ is cycle rank density.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a mechanical toy model that explains the universal dependence of stretch at break on cycle rank density observed in phantom chain simulations of polymer networks. It treats the material as a chain of springs representing highly stretched strands alternating with the softer surrounding network, then ties the stiffness contrast directly to the cycle rank density ξ. From this setup the model produces a closed-form expression for the break stretch that collapses data for different node functionalities and conversion rates onto one curve. A reader would care because the derivation supplies a physical mechanism for the empirical master curve without requiring full topological enumeration of the network.

Core claim

Modeling the network as a sequence of springs for localized highly stretched strands and the surrounding unstretched network, with the stiffness contrast set by cycle rank density ξ, produces the analytical relation λ_b-1 ∝ (3ξ+6)/(3ξ+2). The same expression accounts for the dependence on functionality and reaction conversion once they are expressed through ξ, and it matches both Gaussian and FENE spring simulations.

What carries the argument

Stiffness contrast between highly stretched strands and the surrounding network, scaled directly by the cycle rank density ξ.

If this is right

Higher cycle rank density reduces the achievable stretch before rupture.
The master curve collapses data across different node functionalities and reaction conversions.
The same scaling holds for both Gaussian and finite-extensibility spring models.
Rupture is controlled by the relative compliance of the stretched paths versus the network background.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The toy model could be tested against experimental rupture data on model gels whose cycle rank density is independently measured.
Adding entanglements or real-chain effects would require a modified stiffness contrast term.
The functional form suggests a limiting stretch ratio of 3 as ξ becomes large, which could be checked in highly cross-linked networks.

Load-bearing premise

The stiffness contrast between the highly stretched strands and the rest of the network can be expressed as a simple linear function of cycle rank density ξ that yields exactly the observed functional form.

What would settle it

Phantom-chain simulations that produce stretch-at-break values lying systematically off the curve λ_b-1 = k(3ξ+6)/(3ξ+2) for a range of ξ values would falsify the model.

read the original abstract

The relationship between the topological architecture of polymer networks and their macroscopic rupture remains a fundamental challenge in polymer physics. Recent coarse-grained simulations have revealed that the dependence of stretch at break (\lambda_b) on node functionality and reaction conversion can be unified into a universal master curve when plotted against the cycle rank density (\xi). However, a theoretical derivation explaining this universality has been lacking. This study proposes a simple mechanical model to describe the \xi-dependence of \lambda_b. The polymer network is modeled as a mechanical system consisting of a sequence of springs representing localized, highly stretched strands and the surrounding unstretched network. By relating the stiffness contrast between these regions to the network connectivity defined by \xi, an analytical expression for the stretch at break is derived: \lambda_b-1\propto\sfrac{\left(3\xi+6\right)}{\left(3\xi+2\right)}\ . The proposed model is validated against phantom chain simulations using both Gaussian and finite extensibility (FENE) springs. The theoretical prediction shows reasonable agreement with simulation data, providing a physical basis for the phenomenological universality observed in polymer network rupture.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The toy model derives a closed-form expression for stretch at break that tracks the simulation master curve, but the stiffness contrast is set by assumption to recover the exact functional form rather than derived from network topology.

read the letter

The new piece is the analytical expression λ_b-1 ∝ (3ξ+6)/(3ξ+2) obtained from a two-spring mechanical model. One spring stands for the highly stretched strands and the other for the surrounding network; the stiffness ratio is linked to cycle rank density ξ so that the break condition produces that specific ratio of linear terms. The paper shows this tracks the trends from both Gaussian and FENE phantom-chain simulations across different functionalities and conversions, which is useful because earlier work only reported the master curve numerically. The model is simple enough that it gives a concrete picture for why the dependence collapses onto ξ. The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note flags: the mapping from ξ to stiffness contrast is introduced to match the target form rather than obtained from the definition of cycle rank or from phantom-network force balance. No section derives the 3ξ+6 and 3ξ+2 coefficients from topology; they follow once the proportionality is chosen. Validation is stated as “reasonable agreement” without error bars, rms values, or a clear split between fitted and predicted points, so the tightness of the match is hard to judge. The paper is aimed at people who run or interpret polymer-network rupture simulations and want a quick analytical handle on the ξ dependence. A reader who already knows the simulation master curve will see the value in having an explicit formula, even if they want a more bottom-up derivation of the stiffness ratio later. It deserves peer review because the simulations are standard, the model is transparent, and referees can test whether the assumption can be replaced by a calculation from the network structure.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a toy mechanical model for phantom polymer networks in which highly stretched strands and the surrounding network are represented as effective springs in series. Relating the stiffness contrast between these regions to the cycle rank density ξ yields the closed-form prediction λ_b − 1 ∝ (3ξ + 6)/(3ξ + 2). This expression is asserted to explain the universal master curve of stretch at break versus ξ previously observed in coarse-grained simulations; the model is tested against both Gaussian and FENE phantom-chain data and reported to show reasonable agreement.

Significance. If the central derivation can be placed on a firmer footing, the result would supply a compact, analytically tractable explanation for the topological dependence of rupture stretch that has been seen across different functionalities and conversions. The toy-model framing is accessible and could serve as a starting point for more detailed theories, although its quantitative accuracy remains limited by the absence of error metrics and by the phenomenological nature of the stiffness mapping.

major comments (2)

[Model derivation and analytical expression] The mapping from cycle rank density ξ to the stiffness contrast that produces the exact coefficients 3ξ + 6 and 3ξ + 2 is introduced by assumption rather than derived from the definition of cycle rank or from phantom-chain force balance. No section supplies an independent topological or mechanical argument for this functional dependence; the form appears selected to recover the target master curve, which undermines the claim that the expression provides a first-principles basis for the observed universality.
[Validation against phantom-chain simulations] Validation is described only as “reasonable agreement” with simulation data. No quantitative measures (R², mean absolute deviation, error bars on λ_b, or goodness-of-fit across the full ξ range) are reported, making it impossible to judge whether the predicted functional form actually outperforms simpler alternatives or merely reproduces the trend by construction.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract and introduction] The abstract and main text use the symbol ξ for cycle rank density without an explicit reminder of its definition (number of independent loops per node) at first use; a brief parenthetical would improve readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our toy model for the cycle-rank dependence of stretch at break. We address each major comment below, clarifying the phenomenological nature of the model while committing to quantitative improvements in validation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Model derivation and analytical expression] The mapping from cycle rank density ξ to the stiffness contrast that produces the exact coefficients 3ξ + 6 and 3ξ + 2 is introduced by assumption rather than derived from the definition of cycle rank or from phantom-chain force balance. No section supplies an independent topological or mechanical argument for this functional dependence; the form appears selected to recover the target master curve, which undermines the claim that the expression provides a first-principles basis for the observed universality.

Authors: We agree that the specific linear mapping between ξ and the stiffness contrast is a modeling assumption rather than a direct derivation from phantom-network force balance or cycle-rank topology. As a toy model, the functional form is motivated by requiring the effective contrast to recover the correct limiting behaviors: for ξ → 0 (acyclic trees) the contrast yields λ_b − 1 ∝ 3, while for large ξ the ratio approaches unity, consistent with a more redundant network. The coefficients 3ξ + 6 and 3ξ + 2 arise from counting the effective parallel paths contributed by cycles versus the single breaking strand. We will revise the manuscript to state this motivation explicitly, emphasize the toy-model character, and remove any implication of a first-principles derivation. revision: partial
Referee: [Validation against phantom-chain simulations] Validation is described only as “reasonable agreement” with simulation data. No quantitative measures (R², mean absolute deviation, error bars on λ_b, or goodness-of-fit across the full ξ range) are reported, making it impossible to judge whether the predicted functional form actually outperforms simpler alternatives or merely reproduces the trend by construction.

Authors: We accept this criticism. The revised manuscript will include quantitative validation metrics: R² values for the fit of the analytic expression to both Gaussian and FENE data sets, mean absolute deviations, and error bars on the simulated λ_b values obtained from multiple independent runs. We will also compare the toy-model curve against a simpler linear alternative to demonstrate that the proposed functional form improves the description across the full ξ range. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Derivation of λ_b-1 ∝ (3ξ+6)/(3ξ+2) rests on an assumed functional mapping from cycle rank ξ to stiffness contrast without explicit topological derivation

specific steps

self definitional [Abstract]
"By relating the stiffness contrast between these regions to the network connectivity defined by ξ, an analytical expression for the stretch at break is derived: λ_b-1∝(3ξ+6)/(3ξ+2)"

The paper introduces the stiffness-contrast relation as a modeling step whose functional form is chosen to recover the exact numerator/denominator structure (3ξ+6)/(3ξ+2). No separate derivation from cycle-rank topology or phantom-network equations is supplied; the expression is therefore equivalent to the assumed mapping by algebraic construction.

full rationale

The paper models the network as two effective springs and derives the closed-form stretch-at-break expression by positing a specific stiffness-contrast dependence on cycle-rank density ξ. The resulting coefficients (3ξ+6) and (3ξ+2) are direct algebraic consequences of that posited mapping rather than an independent topological or mechanical derivation from the definition of ξ or phantom-chain force balance. Consequently the claimed analytical prediction reduces to the input assumption by construction; agreement with simulation data validates the ansatz but does not constitute a first-principles result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on domain assumptions about representing the network as springs in series and linking stiffness contrast directly to cycle rank density ξ; no new entities or free parameters are explicitly introduced beyond the proportionality.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The polymer network can be modeled as a sequence of springs representing localized highly stretched strands and the surrounding unstretched network.
Core modeling choice stated in the mechanical system description.
ad hoc to paper The stiffness contrast between these regions is related to the network connectivity defined by ξ.
This relation is invoked to derive the specific functional form and is not derived from more fundamental network topology.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5493 in / 1483 out tokens · 34439 ms · 2026-05-16T09:43:15.963648+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

[1]

1 A Toy Model for the Cycle Rank Dependence of Stretch at Break in Phantom Chain Network Simulations Yuichi Masubuchi Department of Materials Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya 4649603, Japan mas@mp.pse.nagoya-u.ac.jp Jan 28, 2026 Submitted to the Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics Abstract The relationship between the topological architecture of po...

work page 2026
[2]

with the simulation results for FENE spring networks [22]with the strand length at 7 (red), 11 (blue), 21 (green), and 41 (sky blue). Symbols indicate f = 3 (filled circle), 4 (unfilled circle), 5 (filled triangle), 6 (unfilled triangle), 7 (filled square), and 89123456789102λb 0.012345670.123456712345ξ 45678910234567λb 0.012345670.123456712345ξ 7 8 (unfi...

work page arXiv
[3]

https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527346547

work page doi:10.1002/9783527346547
[4]

W. Kuhn, Dependence of the average transversal on the longitudinal dimensions of 25201510λyλs 1.00.80.60.40.20.0ξ 9 statistical coils formed by chain molecules, Journal of Polymer Science 1 (1946) 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1946.120010505

work page doi:10.1002/pol.1946.120010505 1946
[5]

Lake, A.G

J. Lake, A.G. Thomas, The strength of highly elastic materials, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 300 (1967) 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1967.0160

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1967.0160 1967
[6]

Fu, Strong and tough hydrogels crosslinked by multi-functional polymer colloids, J

J. Fu, Strong and tough hydrogels crosslinked by multi-functional polymer colloids, J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 56 (2018) 1336–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.24728

work page doi:10.1002/polb.24728 2018
[7]

Fujiyabu, N

T. Fujiyabu, N. Sakumichi, T. Katashima, C. Liu, K. Mayumi, U. Chung, T. Sakai, Tri-branched gels: Rubbery materials with the lowest branching factor approach the ideal elastic limit, Sci. Adv. 8 (2022) abk0010_1-abk0010_10. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abk0010

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abk0010 2022
[8]

M a s u b u c h i , T

Y. M a s u b u c h i , T. I s h i d a , Y. K o i d e , T. U n e y a m a , A r e v i e w o n m o l e c u l a r s i m u l a t i o n s f o r the rupture of cross-linked polymer networks, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 26 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2025.2587391

work page doi:10.1080/14686996.2025.2587391 2025
[9]

Stevens, Manipulating connectivity to control fracture in network polymer adhesives, Macromolecules 34 (2001) 1411–1415

M.J. Stevens, Manipulating connectivity to control fracture in network polymer adhesives, Macromolecules 34 (2001) 1411–1415. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma0009505

work page doi:10.1021/ma0009505 2001
[10]

Stevens, Interfacial Fracture between Highly Cross-Linked Polymer Networks and a Solid Surface: Effect of Interfacial Bond Density, Macromolecules 34 (2001) 2710–2718

M.J. Stevens, Interfacial Fracture between Highly Cross-Linked Polymer Networks and a Solid Surface: Effect of Interfacial Bond Density, Macromolecules 34 (2001) 2710–2718. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma000553u

work page doi:10.1021/ma000553u 2001
[11]

Barney, Z

C.W. Barney, Z. Ye, I. Sacligil, K.R. McLeod, H. Zhang, G.N. Tew, R.A. Riggleman, A.J. Crosby, Fracture of model end-linked networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (2022) 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2112389119

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2112389119 2022
[12]

Hagita, T

K. Hagita, T. Murashima, Critical Importance of Both Bond Breakage and Network Heterogeneity in Hysteresis Loop on Stress–Strain Curves and Scattering Patterns, Macromolecules 57 (2024) 10903–10911. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.4c01996

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.4c01996 2024
[13]

Furuya, T

T. Furuya, T. Koga, Molecular Simulation of Effects of Network Structure on Fracture Behavior of Gels Synthesized by Radical Polymerization, Macromolecules 58 (2025) 3359–3368. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.4c02875

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.4c02875 2025
[14]

H i g u c h i , K

Y. H i g u c h i , K . S a i t o , T. S a k a i , J . P. G o n g , M . K u b o , F r a c t u r e P r o c e s s o f D o u b l e-Network Gels by Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Macromolecules 51 (2018) 3075–3087. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00124

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00124 2018
[15]

Uehara, Y

S. Uehara, Y . Wang, Y . Ootani, N. Ozawa, M. Kubo, Molecular-Level Elucidation of a Fracture Process in Slide-Ring Gels via Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulations, Macromolecules 55 (2022) 1946–1956. 10 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01981

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01981 2022
[16]

M a s u b u c h i , Y

Y. M a s u b u c h i , Y. D o i , T. I s h i d a , N . S a k u m i c h i , T. S a k a i , K . M a y u m i , T. U n e y a m a , Phantom Chain Simulations for the Fracture of Energy-Minimized Tetra- and Tri-Branched Networks, Macromolecules 56 (2023) 2217–2223. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c00047

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.3c00047 2023
[17]

M a s u b u c h i , Y

Y. M a s u b u c h i , Y. D o i , T. I s h i d a , N . S a k u m i c h i , T. S a k a i , K . M a y u m i , K . S a t o h , T. Uneyama, Phantom-Chain Simulations for the Effect of Node Functionality on the Fracture of Star-Polymer Networks, Macromolecules 56 (2023) 9359–9367. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01291

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01291 2023
[18]

Y. M a s u b u c h i , P h a n t o m C h a i n S i m u l a t i o n s f o r t h e E ff e c t o f S t o i c h i o m e t r y o n t h e Fracture of Star-Polymer Networks, Nihon Reoroji Gakkaishi 52 (2024) 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1678/rheology.52.21

work page doi:10.1678/rheology.52.21 2024
[19]

M a s u b u c h i , P h a n t o m c h a i n s i m u l a t i o n s f o r f r a c t u r e o f e n d-linking networks, Polymer (Guildf)

Y. M a s u b u c h i , P h a n t o m c h a i n s i m u l a t i o n s f o r f r a c t u r e o f e n d-linking networks, Polymer (Guildf). 297 (2024) 126880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2024.126880

work page doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2024.126880 2024
[20]

Y. M a s u b u c h i , P h a n t o m c h a i n s i m u l a t i o n s f o r f r a c t u r e o f p o l y m e r n e t w o r k s c r e a t e d f r o m star polymer mixtures of different functionalities, Polym. J. 56 (2024) 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-023-00862-w

work page doi:10.1038/s41428-023-00862-w 2024
[21]

M a s u b u c h i , T

Y. M a s u b u c h i , T. I s h i d a , Y. K o i d e , T. U n e y a m a , P h a n t o m c h a i n s i m u l a t i o n s f o r t h e fracture of star polymer networks with various strand densities, Soft Matter 20 (2024) 7103–7110. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SM00726C

work page doi:10.1039/d4sm00726c 2024
[22]

Y. M a s u b u c h i , P h a n t o m C h a i n S i m u l a t i o n s f o r t h e F r a c t u r e o f S t a r P o l y m e r N e t w o r k s o n the Effect of Arm Molecular Weight, Macromolecules 58 (2025) 6399–6405. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.5c00475

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5c00475 2025
[23]

M a s u b u c h i , T

Y. M a s u b u c h i , T. I s h i d a , Y. K o i d e , T. U n e y a m a , I n f l u e n c e o f S t r e t c h i n g B o u n d a r y Conditions on Fracture in Phantom Star Polymer Networks: From V olume to Cross-sectional Area Conservation, (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.01844

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.01844 2025
[24]

Arora, T.S

A. Arora, T.S. Lin, B.D. Olsen, Coarse-Grained Simulations for Fracture of Polymer Networks: Stress Versus Topological Inhomogeneities, Macromolecules 55 (2022) 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01689

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01689 2022
[25]

Nishi, M

K. Nishi, M. Chijiishi, Y . Katsumoto, T. Nakao, K. Fujii, U. Chung, H. Noguchi, T. Sakai, M. Shibayama, Rubber elasticity for incomplete polymer networks, J. Chem. Phys. 137 (2012) 224903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4769829

work page doi:10.1063/1.4769829 2012
[26]

Lang, Elasticity of Phantom Model Networks with Cyclic Defects, ACS Macro Lett

M. Lang, Elasticity of Phantom Model Networks with Cyclic Defects, ACS Macro Lett. 7 (2018) 536–539. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00020

work page doi:10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00020 2018
[27]

Macosko, D.R

C.W. Macosko, D.R. Miller, A New Derivation of Average Molecular Weights of Nonlinear Polymers, Macromolecules 9 (1976) 199–206. 11 https://doi.org/10.1021/ma60050a003

work page doi:10.1021/ma60050a003 1976
[28]

Miller, C.W

D.R. Miller, C.W. Macosko, A New Derivation of Post Gel Properties of Network Polymers, Macromolecules 9 (1976) 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma60050a004

work page doi:10.1021/ma60050a004 1976
[29]

Sakai, Gelation mechanism and mechanical properties of Tetra-PEG gel, React

T. Sakai, Gelation mechanism and mechanical properties of Tetra-PEG gel, React. Funct. Polym. 73 (2013) 898–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2013.03.015

work page doi:10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2013.03.015 2013
[30]

M a s u b u c h i , Y

Y. M a s u b u c h i , Y. K o i d e , T. I s h i d a , T. U n e y a m a , B r o w n i a n s i m u l a t i o n s f o r f r a c t u r e o f s t a r polymer phantom networks, Polym. J. 57 (2025) 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-024-00992-9

work page doi:10.1038/s41428-024-00992-9 2025
[31]

Matsuda, N

T. Matsuda, N. Kashimura, T. Sakai, T. Nakajima, T. Matsushita, J.P. Gong, Yielding of Double-Network Hydrogels with Systematically Controlled Tetra-PEG First Networks, Macromolecules 58 (2025) 6017‒6032. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.4c02446

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.4c02446 2025

[1] [1]

1 A Toy Model for the Cycle Rank Dependence of Stretch at Break in Phantom Chain Network Simulations Yuichi Masubuchi Department of Materials Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya 4649603, Japan mas@mp.pse.nagoya-u.ac.jp Jan 28, 2026 Submitted to the Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics Abstract The relationship between the topological architecture of po...

work page 2026

[2] [2]

with the simulation results for FENE spring networks [22]with the strand length at 7 (red), 11 (blue), 21 (green), and 41 (sky blue). Symbols indicate f = 3 (filled circle), 4 (unfilled circle), 5 (filled triangle), 6 (unfilled triangle), 7 (filled square), and 89123456789102λb 0.012345670.123456712345ξ 45678910234567λb 0.012345670.123456712345ξ 7 8 (unfi...

work page arXiv

[3] [3]

https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527346547

work page doi:10.1002/9783527346547

[4] [4]

W. Kuhn, Dependence of the average transversal on the longitudinal dimensions of 25201510λyλs 1.00.80.60.40.20.0ξ 9 statistical coils formed by chain molecules, Journal of Polymer Science 1 (1946) 380–388. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1946.120010505

work page doi:10.1002/pol.1946.120010505 1946

[5] [5]

Lake, A.G

J. Lake, A.G. Thomas, The strength of highly elastic materials, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A Math. Phys. Sci. 300 (1967) 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1967.0160

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1967.0160 1967

[6] [6]

Fu, Strong and tough hydrogels crosslinked by multi-functional polymer colloids, J

J. Fu, Strong and tough hydrogels crosslinked by multi-functional polymer colloids, J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 56 (2018) 1336–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.24728

work page doi:10.1002/polb.24728 2018

[7] [7]

Fujiyabu, N

T. Fujiyabu, N. Sakumichi, T. Katashima, C. Liu, K. Mayumi, U. Chung, T. Sakai, Tri-branched gels: Rubbery materials with the lowest branching factor approach the ideal elastic limit, Sci. Adv. 8 (2022) abk0010_1-abk0010_10. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abk0010

work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abk0010 2022

[8] [8]

M a s u b u c h i , T

Y. M a s u b u c h i , T. I s h i d a , Y. K o i d e , T. U n e y a m a , A r e v i e w o n m o l e c u l a r s i m u l a t i o n s f o r the rupture of cross-linked polymer networks, Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 26 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2025.2587391

work page doi:10.1080/14686996.2025.2587391 2025

[9] [9]

Stevens, Manipulating connectivity to control fracture in network polymer adhesives, Macromolecules 34 (2001) 1411–1415

M.J. Stevens, Manipulating connectivity to control fracture in network polymer adhesives, Macromolecules 34 (2001) 1411–1415. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma0009505

work page doi:10.1021/ma0009505 2001

[10] [10]

Stevens, Interfacial Fracture between Highly Cross-Linked Polymer Networks and a Solid Surface: Effect of Interfacial Bond Density, Macromolecules 34 (2001) 2710–2718

M.J. Stevens, Interfacial Fracture between Highly Cross-Linked Polymer Networks and a Solid Surface: Effect of Interfacial Bond Density, Macromolecules 34 (2001) 2710–2718. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma000553u

work page doi:10.1021/ma000553u 2001

[11] [11]

Barney, Z

C.W. Barney, Z. Ye, I. Sacligil, K.R. McLeod, H. Zhang, G.N. Tew, R.A. Riggleman, A.J. Crosby, Fracture of model end-linked networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (2022) 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2112389119

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2112389119 2022

[12] [12]

Hagita, T

K. Hagita, T. Murashima, Critical Importance of Both Bond Breakage and Network Heterogeneity in Hysteresis Loop on Stress–Strain Curves and Scattering Patterns, Macromolecules 57 (2024) 10903–10911. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.4c01996

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.4c01996 2024

[13] [13]

Furuya, T

T. Furuya, T. Koga, Molecular Simulation of Effects of Network Structure on Fracture Behavior of Gels Synthesized by Radical Polymerization, Macromolecules 58 (2025) 3359–3368. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.4c02875

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.4c02875 2025

[14] [14]

H i g u c h i , K

Y. H i g u c h i , K . S a i t o , T. S a k a i , J . P. G o n g , M . K u b o , F r a c t u r e P r o c e s s o f D o u b l e-Network Gels by Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Macromolecules 51 (2018) 3075–3087. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00124

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00124 2018

[15] [15]

Uehara, Y

S. Uehara, Y . Wang, Y . Ootani, N. Ozawa, M. Kubo, Molecular-Level Elucidation of a Fracture Process in Slide-Ring Gels via Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamics Simulations, Macromolecules 55 (2022) 1946–1956. 10 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01981

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01981 2022

[16] [16]

M a s u b u c h i , Y

Y. M a s u b u c h i , Y. D o i , T. I s h i d a , N . S a k u m i c h i , T. S a k a i , K . M a y u m i , T. U n e y a m a , Phantom Chain Simulations for the Fracture of Energy-Minimized Tetra- and Tri-Branched Networks, Macromolecules 56 (2023) 2217–2223. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c00047

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.3c00047 2023

[17] [17]

M a s u b u c h i , Y

Y. M a s u b u c h i , Y. D o i , T. I s h i d a , N . S a k u m i c h i , T. S a k a i , K . M a y u m i , K . S a t o h , T. Uneyama, Phantom-Chain Simulations for the Effect of Node Functionality on the Fracture of Star-Polymer Networks, Macromolecules 56 (2023) 9359–9367. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01291

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.3c01291 2023

[18] [18]

Y. M a s u b u c h i , P h a n t o m C h a i n S i m u l a t i o n s f o r t h e E ff e c t o f S t o i c h i o m e t r y o n t h e Fracture of Star-Polymer Networks, Nihon Reoroji Gakkaishi 52 (2024) 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1678/rheology.52.21

work page doi:10.1678/rheology.52.21 2024

[19] [19]

M a s u b u c h i , P h a n t o m c h a i n s i m u l a t i o n s f o r f r a c t u r e o f e n d-linking networks, Polymer (Guildf)

Y. M a s u b u c h i , P h a n t o m c h a i n s i m u l a t i o n s f o r f r a c t u r e o f e n d-linking networks, Polymer (Guildf). 297 (2024) 126880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2024.126880

work page doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2024.126880 2024

[20] [20]

Y. M a s u b u c h i , P h a n t o m c h a i n s i m u l a t i o n s f o r f r a c t u r e o f p o l y m e r n e t w o r k s c r e a t e d f r o m star polymer mixtures of different functionalities, Polym. J. 56 (2024) 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-023-00862-w

work page doi:10.1038/s41428-023-00862-w 2024

[21] [21]

M a s u b u c h i , T

Y. M a s u b u c h i , T. I s h i d a , Y. K o i d e , T. U n e y a m a , P h a n t o m c h a i n s i m u l a t i o n s f o r t h e fracture of star polymer networks with various strand densities, Soft Matter 20 (2024) 7103–7110. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SM00726C

work page doi:10.1039/d4sm00726c 2024

[22] [22]

Y. M a s u b u c h i , P h a n t o m C h a i n S i m u l a t i o n s f o r t h e F r a c t u r e o f S t a r P o l y m e r N e t w o r k s o n the Effect of Arm Molecular Weight, Macromolecules 58 (2025) 6399–6405. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.5c00475

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5c00475 2025

[23] [23]

M a s u b u c h i , T

Y. M a s u b u c h i , T. I s h i d a , Y. K o i d e , T. U n e y a m a , I n f l u e n c e o f S t r e t c h i n g B o u n d a r y Conditions on Fracture in Phantom Star Polymer Networks: From V olume to Cross-sectional Area Conservation, (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.01844

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.01844 2025

[24] [24]

Arora, T.S

A. Arora, T.S. Lin, B.D. Olsen, Coarse-Grained Simulations for Fracture of Polymer Networks: Stress Versus Topological Inhomogeneities, Macromolecules 55 (2022) 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01689

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.1c01689 2022

[25] [25]

Nishi, M

K. Nishi, M. Chijiishi, Y . Katsumoto, T. Nakao, K. Fujii, U. Chung, H. Noguchi, T. Sakai, M. Shibayama, Rubber elasticity for incomplete polymer networks, J. Chem. Phys. 137 (2012) 224903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4769829

work page doi:10.1063/1.4769829 2012

[26] [26]

Lang, Elasticity of Phantom Model Networks with Cyclic Defects, ACS Macro Lett

M. Lang, Elasticity of Phantom Model Networks with Cyclic Defects, ACS Macro Lett. 7 (2018) 536–539. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00020

work page doi:10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00020 2018

[27] [27]

Macosko, D.R

C.W. Macosko, D.R. Miller, A New Derivation of Average Molecular Weights of Nonlinear Polymers, Macromolecules 9 (1976) 199–206. 11 https://doi.org/10.1021/ma60050a003

work page doi:10.1021/ma60050a003 1976

[28] [28]

Miller, C.W

D.R. Miller, C.W. Macosko, A New Derivation of Post Gel Properties of Network Polymers, Macromolecules 9 (1976) 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma60050a004

work page doi:10.1021/ma60050a004 1976

[29] [29]

Sakai, Gelation mechanism and mechanical properties of Tetra-PEG gel, React

T. Sakai, Gelation mechanism and mechanical properties of Tetra-PEG gel, React. Funct. Polym. 73 (2013) 898–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2013.03.015

work page doi:10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2013.03.015 2013

[30] [30]

M a s u b u c h i , Y

Y. M a s u b u c h i , Y. K o i d e , T. I s h i d a , T. U n e y a m a , B r o w n i a n s i m u l a t i o n s f o r f r a c t u r e o f s t a r polymer phantom networks, Polym. J. 57 (2025) 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-024-00992-9

work page doi:10.1038/s41428-024-00992-9 2025

[31] [31]

Matsuda, N

T. Matsuda, N. Kashimura, T. Sakai, T. Nakajima, T. Matsushita, J.P. Gong, Yielding of Double-Network Hydrogels with Systematically Controlled Tetra-PEG First Networks, Macromolecules 58 (2025) 6017‒6032. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.4c02446

work page doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.4c02446 2025