pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.00033 · v2 · pith:OYNOESOSnew · submitted 2026-01-18 · 💻 cs.CY

Mapping the Stochastic Penal Colony

Robert Grimm This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 13:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CY
keywords content moderationstochastic penal colonyaccount suspensionalgorithmic punishmentFoucaultplatform governanceauto-ethnographyprocedural justice
0
0 comments X

The pith

Content moderation banishes users to a stochastic penal colony through the constant threat of account suspension.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reworks Foucault's penal model for the algorithmic age to define the stochastic penal colony as a liminal space between punishment as public performance and punishment as internal discipline. It introduces a methodology that pairs auto-ethnography for collecting user experiences with procedural justice to evaluate them. Three case studies then show how this dynamic appears in practice: pre-Musk Twitter's openly performative moderation, OpenAI's tightly controlling moderation of DALL-E 2, and Pinterest's quietly manipulative moderation. Across these very different styles, the shared mechanism is the ever-present risk of account suspension that removes users who post violative content while the platforms serve their own interests. A reader would care because the account shows how everyday digital participation now carries a background threat of digital exile.

Core claim

By adapting Foucault's framework, the stochastic penal colony emerges as a figurative liminal practice in algorithmic content moderation. It sits between punishment enacted for visibility and punishment enacted for control. Case studies of pre-Musk Twitter, OpenAI's DALL-E 2 moderation, and Pinterest demonstrate that each approach, despite their differences, relies on the pervasive threat of account suspension to banish users who post violative content, allowing the moderating organizations to act in self-serving ways.

What carries the argument

the stochastic penal colony: a liminal punitive space in algorithmic moderation, positioned between performance and discipline, and maintained by the threat of account suspension.

If this is right

  • Users who post violative content face banishment rather than transparent discipline.
  • Platforms can maintain control through the background threat of suspension even when their visible moderation styles differ.
  • The combination of auto-ethnography and procedural justice exposes how self-serving actions persist across performative, controlling, and manipulative approaches.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framing could be tested on additional platforms to check whether suspension threats remain central outside the three studied cases.
  • If the model holds, users might develop collective strategies to reduce the isolating effect of sudden suspensions.
  • The same liminal logic might appear in other algorithmic governance systems such as recommendation engines or automated account restrictions.

Load-bearing premise

Foucault's historical penal model can be applied directly to modern algorithmic content moderation without losing its essential structure, and the three chosen platforms represent wider practices.

What would settle it

Documentation of a major platform whose moderation system never threatens account suspension and consistently operates without self-serving bias would undermine the claim that the stochastic penal colony is a pervasive feature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.00033 by Robert Grimm.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Twitter’s restricted user interface centers all attention on the violative tweet. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Be nice to dall•e’s pets! Section B.1 documents dall•e 2’s content policy and Section B.2 its addendum to OpenAI’s terms of use, both as of July 20, 2022. They preserve the structure of the original, with links pointing to pages in the Internet Archive. Note that archived OpenAI webpages may contain CSS that prevents the printing of a full page and JavaScript that redirects to an error page after a few sec… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

With peak content moderation seemingly behind us, this paper revisits its punitive side. But instead of focusing on who is being (disproportionately) moderated, it focuses on the punishment itself and explores the question of how content moderation treats users posting violative content unjustly, while the organizations doing the moderation act in a self-serving manner. First, this paper reworks Foucault's model of the penal system for the algorithmic age, restoring the penal colony as a figuratively liminal practice between punishment as performance and punishment as discipline, i.e., the stochastic penal colony. Second, it develops a novel methodology that combines auto-ethnography for collecting experiences and artifacts with procedural justice for analyzing them. Third, it applies this conceptual and methodological framing to three case studies, one on pre-Musk Twitter's gallingly performative moderation, one on OpenAI's exhaustively controlling moderation for DALL-E 2, and one on Pinterest's underhandedly manipulative moderation. While substantially different, all three feature the pervasive threat of account suspension, which banishes users to the stochastic penal colony.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reworks Foucault's penal colony into a 'stochastic penal colony' as a liminal punitive space in algorithmic content moderation, characterized by the pervasive threat of account suspension. It introduces a methodology combining auto-ethnography for data collection with procedural justice analysis, then applies this to three case studies: pre-Musk Twitter's performative moderation, OpenAI's DALL-E 2 controlling moderation, and Pinterest's manipulative moderation. The central claim is that these disparate platforms share the feature of banishing users to this stochastic space through unjust and self-serving moderation practices.

Significance. If the conceptual mapping holds, the work offers a novel theoretical lens for platform studies by shifting focus from moderated demographics to the structural nature of punishment via uncertainty and liminality. The integration of auto-ethnography with procedural justice provides a grounded qualitative method for analyzing moderation artifacts, which is a clear strength. This could inform interdisciplinary debates in CS, law, and sociology on platform power, though its significance is limited by the interpretive scope and lack of broader empirical benchmarks.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (reworking of Foucault): The adaptation of the penal colony model to the stochastic variant is load-bearing for the central claim, yet lacks an explicit side-by-side mapping of preserved versus modified elements from the original Foucault framework; this makes it difficult to assess whether essential accuracy is retained when applying it to algorithmic moderation.
  2. [Case studies] Case studies section: The unifying claim that all three platforms feature the pervasive threat of account suspension as banishment to the stochastic penal colony rests on interpretive analysis of selected cases, but the criteria for choosing Twitter, OpenAI DALL-E 2, and Pinterest (and their representativeness of broader practices) are not justified, undermining generalizability of the pervasiveness argument.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The opening claim that 'peak content moderation seemingly behind us' is presented without references or data; consider grounding or qualifying this statement.
  2. Terminology: The phrase 'stochastic penal colony' is used throughout but would benefit from a concise formal definition early in the manuscript to aid reader clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive comments, which have prompted us to clarify key aspects of the conceptual framework and case selection. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (reworking of Foucault): The adaptation of the penal colony model to the stochastic variant is load-bearing for the central claim, yet lacks an explicit side-by-side mapping of preserved versus modified elements from the original Foucault framework; this makes it difficult to assess whether essential accuracy is retained when applying it to algorithmic moderation.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit side-by-side mapping is needed to demonstrate fidelity to Foucault's framework. In the revised manuscript, we will insert a table in §2 that lists core elements of the original penal colony model (e.g., spatial liminality, perpetual threat of banishment, and the interplay of performance and discipline) alongside their stochastic counterparts, noting which aspects are preserved, modified, or newly introduced, with brief justifications for each adaptation to the algorithmic setting. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Case studies] Case studies section: The unifying claim that all three platforms feature the pervasive threat of account suspension as banishment to the stochastic penal colony rests on interpretive analysis of selected cases, but the criteria for choosing Twitter, OpenAI DALL-E 2, and Pinterest (and their representativeness of broader practices) are not justified, undermining generalizability of the pervasiveness argument.

    Authors: We selected the three platforms to exemplify distinct moderation styles (performative, controlling, and manipulative) while sharing the common mechanism of suspension threats, thereby illustrating the concept's applicability across varied contexts. We acknowledge that the selection criteria and scope were insufficiently stated. In revision, we will add a brief subsection explaining the rationale—diversity of moderation approaches and accessibility of public artifacts for auto-ethnography—and will explicitly note that the cases are illustrative rather than statistically representative of all platforms. This preserves the interpretive focus while addressing generalizability concerns. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in conceptual reframing

full rationale

The paper is a theoretical work that reworks Foucault's penal model into the 'stochastic penal colony' concept as a liminal practice between performance and discipline, then applies a combined auto-ethnography and procedural-justice methodology to three case studies. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivations appear that reduce to their own inputs by construction. The case studies illustrate the pervasive threat of account suspension (which the paper defines as banishing users to the colony), but this is interpretive mapping rather than a self-definitional loop or fitted-input prediction. No self-citations are load-bearing, no uniqueness theorems are imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The argument structure is self-contained as conceptual reframing without circular reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The analysis rests on the applicability of Foucault's penal model to platforms and introduces one new metaphorical entity without external falsifiable tests.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Foucault's model of the penal system can be reworked for the algorithmic age to describe content moderation as a liminal practice between performance and discipline.
    Stated in the first section of the abstract as the foundational conceptual move.
invented entities (1)
  • stochastic penal colony no independent evidence
    purpose: To capture the figurative liminal space of unpredictable account suspension in content moderation.
    New term introduced to unify the three case studies under a single punitive framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5470 in / 1280 out tokens · 50581 ms · 2026-05-16T13:44:21.291678+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 119 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Access Now, ACLU Foundation of Northern California, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Article 19, Brennan Center for Justice, Center for Democracy & Technology, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Global Partners Digital, InternetLab, National Coalition Against Censorship, New America’s Open Technology Institute, Ranking Digital Rights, Red en Defensa d...

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Robert Aldrich. 2010. The French Overseas Empire and Its Contemporary Legacy.European History Quarterly40, 1 (Jan. 2010), 97–108. https: //doi.org/10.1177/0265691409351339

    work page doi:10.1177/0265691409351339 2010

  3. [3]

    2018.A Global History of Convicts and Penal Colonies

    Clare Anderson (Ed.). 2018.A Global History of Convicts and Penal Colonies. Bloomsbury Academic, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.5040/ 9781350000704

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine Bias.ProPublica(May 2016). https://www.propublica.org/article/ machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Anonymous. 2016. Incident 37: Female Applicants Down-Ranked by Amazon Recruiting Tool.Artificial Intelligence Incident Database(Aug. 2016). https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/37/

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Anonymous. 2018. Incident 405: Schufa Credit Scoring in Germany Reported for Unreliable and Imbalanced Scores.Artificial Intelligence Incident Database(Nov. 2018).https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/405

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Carolina Are. 2023. An Autoethnography of Automated Powerlessness: Lacking Platform Affordances in Instagram and TikTok Account Deletions. Media, Culture & Society45, 4 (May 2023), 822–840.https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221140531

    work page doi:10.1177/01634437221140531 2023

  8. [8]

    Isaac Arnsdorf. 2020. Inside Trump and Barr’s Last-Minute Killing Spree.ProPublica(Dec. 2020). https://www.propublica.org/article/inside- trump-and-barrs-last-minute-killing-spree/amp

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Daniel Atherton. 2022. Incident 303: Google’s Automated Child Abuse Detection Wrongfully Flagged a Parent’s Naked Photo of His Child. Artificial Intelligence Incident Database(Aug. 2022).https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/303

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Dina Bass. 2023. Microsoft Invests $10 Billion in ChatGPT Maker OpenAI.Bloomberg(Jan. 2023). https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023- 01-23/microsoft-makes-multibillion-dollar-investment-in-openai

    work page 2023

  11. [11]

    Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell

    Emily M. Bender, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? . InProceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 610–623.https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922

    work page doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 2021

  12. [12]

    Abeba Birhane, Vinay Uday Prabhu, and Emmanuel Kahembwe. 2021. Multimodal Datasets: Misogyny, Pornography, and Malignant Stereotypes. arXiv:2110.01963 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.01963

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Claire Brown

    H. Claire Brown. 2019. Amazon’s On-Site Emergency Care Endangers Its Own Employees.The Intercept(Dec. 2019). https://theintercept.com/ 2019/12/02/amazon-warehouse-workers-safety-cyber-monday/

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey 14 Robert Grimm Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler...

    work page 2020

  15. [15]

    Martini & J Sprenger (2017): Opinion Aggregation and Individual Expertise

    Taina Bucher. 2018.If...Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. 10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001. 0001

    work page doi:10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001 2018

  16. [16]

    Ashley Casovan. 2022. Incident 430: Lawyers Denied Entry to Performance Venue by Facial Recognition.Artificial Intelligence Incident Database (Dec. 2022).https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/430

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    CCB. 2022. Copyright Claims Board Handbook.https://ccb.gov/handbook/

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Alia Chughtai. 2022. Mapping the Scale of Damage by the Catastrophic Pakistan Floods | Infographic News | Al Jazeera.Al Jazeera(Sept. 2022). https://www.aljazeera.com/news/longform/2022/9/16/mapping-the-scale-of-destruction-of-the-pakistan-floods

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Mitchell Clark. 2023. Amazon’s OSHA Fine for Warehouse Safety Violations Could Be about $60K.The Verge(Jan. 2023). https://www.theverge. com/2023/1/18/23561506/amazon-osha-citations-ergonomics-struck-by-pace

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Bryce Covert. 2022. The Little-Known Policy Wreaking Havoc on Workers’ Lives.Intelligencer(Aug. 2022). https://nymag.com/intelligencer/ 2022/08/the-little-known-policy-wreaking-havoc-on-workers-lives.html

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Amit Dave. 2022. Birds Fall from the Sky as Heatwave Scorches India.Reuters(May 2022). https://www.reuters.com/world/india/birds-fall-sky- heatwave-scorches-india-2022-05-11/

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Andrea Dehlendorf and Ryan Gerety. 2021. The Punitive Potential of AI.Boston Review(May 2021). https://www.bostonreview.net/forum_ response/the-punitive-potential-of-ai/

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    David Drake. 2005. The Dreyfus Affair and the Birth of the ‘Intellectuals’. InFrench Intellectuals and Politics from the Dreyfus Affair to the Occupation, David Drake (Ed.). Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, 8–34.https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230006096_2

    work page doi:10.1057/9780230006096_2 2005

  24. [24]

    Luyu Du and Barry Bozeman. 2025. Trump’s Destruction of U.S. Universities: Domestic and International Implications.Global Public Policy and Governance5, 4 (Dec. 2025), 380–392.https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-025-00136-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s43508-025-00136-6 2025

  25. [25]

    Jane Edwards. 2021. Ethical Autoethnography: Is It Possible?International Journal of Qualitative Methods20 (Jan. 2021), 160940692199530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921995306

    work page doi:10.1177/1609406921995306 2021

  26. [26]

    2003.The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography

    Carolyn Ellis. 2003.The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. AltaMira Press, Lanham, MD, USA. https://rowman. com/ISBN/9780759115866

    work page arXiv 2003

  27. [27]

    EPIC. 2020. Liberty at Risk: Pre-trial Risk Assessment Tools in the U.S.https://epic.org/documents/liberty-at-risk/

    work page 2020

  28. [29]

    European Commission-DG CONNECT. 2023. Digital Services Act Transparency Database.https://doi.org/10.2906/134353607485211

    work page doi:10.2906/134353607485211 2023

  29. [30]

    1979.Discipline and Punish

    Michel Foucault. 1979.Discipline and Punish. Vintage Books, New York, NY, USA

    work page 1979

  30. [31]

    Stephanie Francis Ward. 2021. While Many Jurisdictions Had Few or No Online Bar Exam Testing Violations, California Had Many.ABA Journal (Jan. 2021). https://www.abajournal.com/web/article/while-many-jurisdictions-had-few-or-no-online-bar-exam-testing-violations-california- had-many

    work page 2021

  31. [32]

    Charles Wellington Furlong. 1913. Cayenne — the Dry Guillotine.Harper’s Magazine127, 757 (June 1913)

    work page 1913

  32. [33]

    Timnit Gebru, Jamie Morgenstern, Briana Vecchione, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Hanna Wallach, Hal Daumé III, and Kate Crawford. 2021. Datasheets for Datasets.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1803.09010arXiv:1803.09010 [cs]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.09010arxiv:1803.09010 2021

  33. [34]

    2022.YouTube Community Guidelines Enforcement

    Google. 2022.YouTube Community Guidelines Enforcement. Transparency Report. Google. https://transparencyreport.google.com/youtube- policy/removals?hl=en

    work page 2022

  34. [35]

    John Gramlich. 2020. Black Imprisonment Rate in the U.S. Has Fallen by a Third since 2006. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/05/06/ share-of-black-white-hispanic-americans-in-prison-2018-vs-2006/

    work page 2020

  35. [36]

    Yael Grauer. 2021. Millions of Leaked Police Files Detail Suffocating Surveillance of China’s Uyghur Minority.The Intercept(Jan. 2021). https: //theintercept.com/2021/01/29/china-uyghur-muslim-surveillance-police/

    work page 2021

  36. [37]

    Nekesha Green, Chavez Procope, Adeel Cheema, and Adediji Adekunle. 2022. System Cards, a New Resource for Understanding How AI Systems Work.https://ai.facebook.com/blog/system-cards-a-new-resource-for-understanding-how-ai-systems-work/

    work page 2022

  37. [38]

    Patrick Hall. 2012. Incident 135: University of Texas at Austin’s Algorithm to Evaluate Graduate Applications, GRADE, Allegedly Exac- erbated Existing Inequality for Marginalized Applicants, Prompting Tool Suspension.Artificial Intelligence Incident Database(Dec. 2012). https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/135

    work page 2012

  38. [39]

    Patrick Hall. 2020. Incident 86: Coding Errors in Leaving Certificate Grading Algorithm Caused Inaccurate Scores in Ireland.Artificial Intelligence Incident Database(Oct. 2020).https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/86

    work page 2020

  39. [40]

    Karen Hao. 2019. AI Is Sending People to Jail—and Getting It Wrong.MIT Technology Review(Jan. 2019). https://www.technologyreview.com/ 2019/01/21/137783/algorithms-criminal-justice-ai/

    work page 2019

  40. [41]

    Karen Hao. 2020. The Messy, Secretive Reality behind OpenAI’s Bid to Save the World.MIT Technology Review(Feb. 2020). https://www. technologyreview.com/2020/02/17/844721/ai-openai-moonshot-elon-musk-sam-altman-greg-brockman-messy-secretive-reality/

    work page 2020

  41. [42]

    Karen Hao and Nadine Freischlad. 2022. The Gig Workers Fighting Back against the Algorithms.MIT Technology Review(April 2022). https: //www.technologyreview.com/2022/04/21/1050381/the-gig-workers-fighting-back-against-the-algorithms/ Mapping the Stochastic Penal Colony 15

    work page 2022

  42. [43]

    Karen Hao and Andrea Paola Hernández. 2022. How the AI Industry Profits from Catastrophe.MIT Technology Review(April 2022). https: //www.technologyreview.com/2022/04/20/1050392/ai-industry-appen-scale-data-labels/

    work page 2022

  43. [44]

    Karen Hao and Heidi Swart. 2022. South Africa’s Private Surveillance Machine Is Fueling a Digital Apartheid.MIT Technology Review(April 2022).https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/04/19/1049996/south-africa-ai-surveillance-digital-apartheid/

    work page 2022

  44. [45]

    Franz Kafka. 1995. In the Penal Colony. InThe Complete Stories. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, New York, NY, USA. https://www.kafka- online.info/in-the-penal-colony.html

    work page 1995

  45. [46]

    Jodi Kantor, Arya Sundaram, Aliza Aufrichtig, and Rumsey Taylor. 2022. The Rise of the Worker Productivity Score.The New York Times(Aug. 2022).https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/08/14/business/worker-productivity-tracking.html

    work page 2022

  46. [47]

    Jodi Kantor, Karen Weise, and Grace Ashford. 2021. The Amazon That Customers Don’t See.The New York Times(June 2021). https://www. nytimes.com/interactive/2021/06/15/us/amazon-workers.html

    work page 2021

  47. [48]

    Matthew Katsaros, Tom Tyler, Jisu Kim, and Tracey Meares. 2022. Procedural Justice and Self Governance on Twitter: Unpacking the Experience of Rule Breaking on Twitter.Journal of Online Trust and Safety1, 3 (Aug. 2022).https://doi.org/10.54501/jots.v1i3.38

    work page doi:10.54501/jots.v1i3.38 2022

  48. [49]

    Sven Felix Kellerhoff. 2022. Spitzelstaat DDR: Die Stasi hatte viel mehr Informanten als bekannt.Die Welt(Jan. 2022). https://www.welt.de/ geschichte/article132502154/Spitzelstaat-DDR-Die-Stasi-hatte-viel-mehr-Informanten-als-bekannt.html

    work page 2022

  49. [50]

    Os Keyes, Jevan Hutson, and Meredith Durbin. 2019. A Mulching Proposal: Analysing and Improving an Algorithmic System for Turning the Elderly into High-Nutrient Slurry. InExtended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’19). Asso- ciation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1145/3...

    work page doi:10.1145/3290607.3310433 2019

  50. [51]

    Kate Klonick. 2018. The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech.Harvard Law Review131, 6 (April 2018), 1598–1670.https://harvardlawreview.org/2018/04/the-new-governors-the-people-rules-and-processes-governing-online-speech/

    work page 2018

  51. [52]

    Lee Kovarsky. 2022. The Trump Executions.Texas Law Review100, 4 (March 2022).https://texaslawreview.org/the-trump-executions/

    work page 2022

  52. [53]

    Seth Kugel. 2022. Help! I Was Banned From Lyft and No One Will Tell Me Why.The New York Times(Nov. 2022). https://www.nytimes.com/ 2022/11/17/travel/tripped-up-banned-lyft.html

    work page 2022

  53. [54]

    Khoa Lam. 2020. Incident 374: UK Ofqual’s Algorithm Disproportionately Provided Lower Grades Than Teachers’ Assessments.Artificial Intelli- gence Incident Database(Aug. 2020).https://incidentdatabase.ai/cite/374

    work page 2020

  54. [55]

    1906.A History of the Inquisition of Spain

    Henry Charles Lea. 1906.A History of the Inquisition of Spain. Vol. 1. The Macmillan Company, New York, NY, USA. http://archive.org/details/ ahistoryinquisi03leagoog

    work page 1906

  55. [56]

    1906.A History of the Inquisition of Spain

    Henry Charles Lea. 1906.A History of the Inquisition of Spain. Vol. 2. The Macmillan Company, New York, NY, USA. http://archive.org/details/ historyofinquisispain02leah

    work page 1906

  56. [57]

    1906.A History of the Inquisition of Spain

    Henry Charles Lea. 1906.A History of the Inquisition of Spain. Vol. 4. The Macmillan Company, New York, NY, USA. http://archive.org/details/ historyofinquisi04leah

    work page 1906

  57. [58]

    1906.A History of the Inquisition of Spain

    Henry Charles Lea. 1906.A History of the Inquisition of Spain. Vol. 3. The Macmillan Company, New York, NY, USA. http://archive.org/details/ historyofinquisi03leahiala

    work page 1906

  58. [59]

    Natasha Lennard. 2020. Amazon Workers Are Organizing a Global Struggle.The Intercept(Dec. 2020). https://theintercept.com/2020/12/03/ amazon-workers-union-international-strike/

    work page 2020

  59. [60]

    Robert Mackey. 2025. French Scientist Denied US Entry after Phone Messages Critical of Trump Found.The Guardian(March 2025). https: //www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/19/trump-musk-french-scientist-detained

    work page 2025

  60. [61]

    Mike Masnick. 2019. Masnick’s Impossibility Theorem: Content Moderation At Scale Is Impossible To Do Well. https://www.techdirt.com/2019/ 11/20/masnicks-impossibility-theorem-content-moderation-scale-is-impossible-to-do-well/

    work page 2019

  61. [62]

    Erin McElroy, Meredith Whittaker, and Nicole E. Weber. 2021. Prison Tech Comes Home.https://www.publicbooks.org/prison-tech-comes-home/

    work page 2021

  62. [63]

    2008.The Torture Garden

    Octave Mirbeau. 2008.The Torture Garden. Bookkake, London, United Kingdom.https://www.bauerverlag.eu/downloads/torture-garden.pdf

    work page 2008

  63. [64]

    Pamela Mishkin and Lama Ahmad. 2022. DALL-E 2 Preview: Risks and Limitations. https://github.com/openai/dalle-2-preview/blob/ eeec5a1843b1d17cb9ed113117a2fcaa9206a564/system-card.md

    work page 2022

  64. [65]

    Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu, Andrew Zaldivar, Parker Barnes, Lucy Vasserman, Ben Hutchinson, Elena Spitzer, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, and Timnit Gebru. 2019. Model Cards for Model Reporting. InProceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 220–229.https://doi.or...

    work page doi:10.1145/3287560.3287596 2019

  65. [66]

    Paul Mozur, Muyi Xiao, and John Liu. 2022. ‘An Invisible Cage’: How China Is Policing the Future.The New York Times(June 2022). https: //www.nytimes.com/2022/06/25/technology/china-surveillance-police.html

    work page 2022

  66. [67]

    Steven Lee Myers. 2025. U.S. Bars 5 European Tech Regulators and Researchers.The New York Times(Dec. 2025). https://www.nytimes.com/ 2025/12/23/technology/trump-rubio-european-tech-disinformation-digital-services-act.html

    work page 2025

  67. [68]

    Peter Nagy and Gina Neff. 2024. Conjuring Algorithms: Understanding the Tech Industry as Stage Magicians.New Media & Society26, 9 (Sept. 2024), 4938–4954.https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241251789

    work page doi:10.1177/14614448241251789 2024

  68. [69]

    Princeton University Press

    Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor. 2024.AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691249131/ai-snake-oil

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [70]

    Natalie. 2022. I Received a Warning While Using DALL·E 2. Will I Be Banned? https://web.archive.org/web/20220818131242/https://help.openai. com/en/articles/6338765-i-received-a-warning-while-using-dall-e-2-will-i-be-banned 16 Robert Grimm

    work page arXiv 2022

  70. [71]

    Molly Olmstead. 2022. Why Did 11 Billion Alaskan Snow Crabs Suddenly Disappear?Slate(Oct. 2022). https://slate.com/technology/2022/10/ alaskan-snow-crabs-dead.html

    work page 2022

  71. [72]

    OpenAI. 2018. OpenAI Charter.https://openai.com/charter/

    work page 2018

  72. [73]

    OpenAI. 2022. DALL·E API Now Available in Public Beta.https://openai.com/blog/dall-e-api-now-available-in-public-beta/

    work page 2022

  73. [74]

    OpenAI. 2022. DALL·E Now Available Without Waitlist.https://openai.com/blog/dall-e-now-available-without-waitlist/

    work page 2022

  74. [75]

    OpenAI. 2022. Updates From OpenAI

    work page 2022

  75. [76]

    Jason Owen-Smith. 2025. Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump.The Chronicle of Higher Education(July 2025). https://www.chronicle.com/article/why-universities-are-so-powerless-in-their-fight-against-trump

    work page 2025

  76. [77]

    Billy Perrigo. 2023. OpenAI Used Kenyan Workers on Less Than $2 Per Hour to Make ChatGPT Less Toxic.Time(Jan. 2023). https://time.com/ 6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/

    work page 2023

  77. [78]

    Perry, Brian McInnis, Carter C

    Walter L. Perry, Brian McInnis, Carter C. Price, Susan Smith, and John S. Hollywood. 2013.Predictive Policing: The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.https://doi.org/10.7249/RR233

    work page doi:10.7249/rr233 2013

  78. [79]

    2022.Q1+Q2 2022 Transparency Report

    Pinterest. 2022.Q1+Q2 2022 Transparency Report. Transparency Report Q1+Q2 2022. Pinterest. https://policy.pinterest.com/en/transparency-report

    work page 2022

  79. [80]

    2022.System-Level Transparency of Machine Learning

    Chavez Procope, Adeel Cheema, David Adkins, Bilal Alsallakh, Nekesha Green, Emily McReynolds, Grace Pehl, Erin Wang, and Polina Zvyagina. 2022.System-Level Transparency of Machine Learning. Technical Report. Meta. https://ai.facebook.com/research/publications/system-level- transparency-of-machine-learning

    work page 2022

  80. [81]

    James Redden, Molly O’Donovan Dix, and Criminal Justice Testing and Evaluation Consortium. 2020. Artificial Intelligence in the Criminal Justice System.https://cjtec.org/artificial-intelligence-in-the-criminal-justice-system/

    work page 2020

Showing first 80 references.