arxiv: 2602.01682 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-02 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.DS· stat.ML

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Finite and Corruption-Robust Regret Bounds in Online Inverse Linear Optimization under M-Convex Action Sets

Taihei Oki , Shinsaku Sakaue

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 08:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.DSstat.ML

keywords online inverse optimizationM-convex setsregret boundscorruption robustnesscontextual recommendationmatroidsfinite regret

0 comments

The pith

When feasible sets are M-convex, online inverse linear optimization attains finite O(d log d) regret.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a finite regret bound of order d log d is possible in online inverse linear optimization when the changing feasible sets belong to the M-convex class. It reaches this bound by pairing a structural description of optimal points on such sets with a geometric argument that controls the volume of uncertain regions. The same technique yields an O((C+1) d log d) bound under at most C corrupted feedback rounds, detected on the fly from induced directed graphs without knowing C beforehand. Prior results had either logarithmic dependence on the time horizon T or an exponentially large finite bound; this work removes the T dependence while keeping the bound polynomial in dimension.

Core claim

When the feasible sets are M-convex, a structural characterization of optimal solutions on these sets combined with a geometric volume argument produces a finite regret bound of O(d log d). The same machinery extends to adversarially corrupted feedback in up to C rounds and delivers O((C+1) d log d) regret by adaptively monitoring directed graphs induced by the observed actions to detect corruptions without prior knowledge of C.

What carries the argument

Structural characterization of optimal solutions on M-convex sets paired with a geometric volume argument on the space of possible objective vectors.

If this is right

The exponential finite bound is replaced by one polynomial in dimension for every M-convex family, including all matroids.
The same algorithm works under unknown numbers of corruptions and still keeps regret linear in C.
The Omega(d) lower bound is matched up to a log d factor when the sets are M-convex.
No prior knowledge of the time horizon T or the corruption count C is required.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

M-convexity appears to be the precise structural feature that turns an exponential search into a polynomial one in this inverse setting.
Similar volume arguments may apply to other discrete convex structures that admit clean optimality characterizations.
The adaptive graph-monitoring technique could be reused in other online learning problems where feedback can be selectively falsified.

Load-bearing premise

The changing feasible sets must satisfy M-convexity so that the structural characterization of their optimal solutions remains valid and the volume argument stays polynomial.

What would settle it

An explicit M-convex family of sets together with a sequence of observed optimal actions for which the learner's cumulative regret grows faster than O(d log d).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.01682 by Shinsaku Sakaue, Taihei Oki.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The decomposition of [0, 1]3 into six order simplices. The order simplex for w(1) > w(2) > w(3) is highlighted in red. Note that for all (i, j) ∈ AT we have w ∗ (i) > w∗ (j). Since the constraints defining PT depend only on these pairwise orderings, any vector w ∈ [0, 1]d whose components have the same order as w ∗ satisfies w(i) ≥ w(j) for all (i, j) ∈ AT , and hence belongs to PT . The set of such w form… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Examples of directed graphs ([d], At+1) in uncorrupted and corrupted sequences; note that the graph for A1 = ∅ is omitted. Let d = 3 and w ∗ ∈ R 3 satisfy w ∗ (1) > w∗ (2) > w∗ (3). Feasible sets Xt are given in the top row. In the uncorrupted case, At+1 remains acyclic for all t. In the corrupted case, x2 (shown in red) is corrupted, adding a wrong arc 3 → 2 to A3. Still, A3 remains acyclic and does not y… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We study online inverse linear optimization, also known as contextual recommendation, where a learner sequentially infers an agent's hidden objective vector from observed optimal actions over feasible sets that change over time. The learner aims to recommend actions that perform well under the agent's true objective, and the performance is measured by the regret, defined as the cumulative gap between the agent's optimal values and those achieved by the learner's recommended actions. Prior work has established a regret bound of $O(d\log T)$, as well as a finite but exponentially large bound of $\exp(O(d\log d))$, where $d$ is the dimension of the optimization problem and $T$ is the time horizon, while a regret lower bound of $\Omega(d)$ is known (Gollapudi et al. 2021; Sakaue et al. 2025). Whether a finite regret bound polynomial in $d$ is achievable or not has remained an open question. We partially resolve this by showing that when the feasible sets are M-convex -- a broad class that includes matroids -- a finite regret bound of $O(d\log d)$ is possible. We achieve this by combining a structural characterization of optimal solutions on M-convex sets with a geometric volume argument. Moreover, we extend our approach to adversarially corrupted feedback in up to $C$ rounds. We obtain a regret bound of $O((C+1)d\log d)$ without prior knowledge of $C$, by monitoring directed graphs induced by the observed feedback to detect corruptions adaptively.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives the first O(d log d) finite regret bound for online inverse linear optimization over M-convex sets by using their exchange property to control the number of distinct cuts in a volume argument.

read the letter

The paper delivers the first finite O(d log d) regret bound for online inverse linear optimization over M-convex action sets. That resolves the open question left by earlier work on general and matroid cases. What stands out is how they use the exchange property of M-convex sets to characterize the optimal actions, then apply a geometric volume argument to show that the number of distinct separating hyperplanes stays polynomial in d. This turns the previous exp(O(d log d)) bound into something linear in log d. The corruption-robust extension is also clean: they track directed graphs from the feedback to spot corruptions on the fly and get O((C+1) d log d) without knowing C upfront. This part feels practical because many real systems have occasional bad observations. The approach looks internally consistent on the surface. The structural characterization is the load-bearing piece, and if it really caps the complexity at O(d) directions for any M-convex set, the volume argument goes through without issues. The stress-test concern about exponential optima in large matroids is worth checking against their lemma, but the abstract suggests they have a reduction that works by focusing on the relevant exchange properties. No circularity or invented parameters show up, and the citation pattern to prior inverse opt work looks standard. This is worth bringing to a reading group focused on online combinatorial optimization. Readers working on contextual bandits or inverse problems over discrete sets will find the bound useful and the proof technique reusable. It deserves a serious referee because it answers a stated open problem with a non-trivial but accessible argument. The math seems grounded in existing M-convex theory rather than ad-hoc fitting. I would send it to peer review. The result is new and the method seems sound enough to warrant detailed feedback on the characterization step.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies online inverse linear optimization (contextual recommendation), where a learner infers an agent's hidden objective vector from sequentially observed optimal actions on time-varying feasible sets. It claims that when feasible sets are M-convex (including matroids), a finite regret bound of O(d log d) is achievable by combining a structural characterization of optimal solutions with a geometric volume argument; this improves on the prior exponential bound exp(O(d log d)). The approach is extended to handle adversarially corrupted feedback in up to C rounds, yielding O((C+1)d log d) regret without knowledge of C via adaptive detection using directed graphs induced by observed feedback.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work partially resolves an open question on the existence of polynomial finite regret bounds for a broad class of structured action sets, moving from exponential to O(d log d) dependence on dimension d. The corruption-robust extension, which adaptively detects corruptions without prior knowledge of C, is a clear strength and broadens applicability. The combination of M-convexity structural properties with volume arguments provides a concrete technique that could extend to other structured optimization settings.

major comments (2)

[Structural characterization section] The structural characterization of optimal solutions on M-convex sets (detailed in the section following the problem formulation) is load-bearing for the O(d log d) claim. The manuscript asserts that this characterization ensures observed optimal actions induce only polynomially many distinct linear cuts in objective space. However, the exchange property of M-convex sets can permit exponentially many distinct optimal points (even in matroid examples with large ground sets), which would leave the arrangement complexity exponential and reduce the volume argument to the prior exp(O(d log d)) bound. An explicit proof or reduction showing that the number of effective directions is O(d) (or polynomial) is required.
[Corruption-robust extension section] In the corruption-robust extension (the section on adversarially corrupted feedback), the adaptive monitoring of directed graphs to detect up to C corruptions without knowing C is presented, but the analysis must explicitly bound the number of false detections and show how they affect the volume argument to preserve the O((C+1)d log d) regret. The current sketch leaves open whether the graph-based detection introduces additional logarithmic factors or requires stronger assumptions on the corruption model.

minor comments (1)

[Introduction] The abstract cites prior lower bound of Omega(d) and upper bounds from Gollapudi et al. 2021 and Sakaue et al. 2025; the introduction should include a dedicated paragraph contrasting the new M-convexity-based finite bound against those results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to provide the requested explicit details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The structural characterization of optimal solutions on M-convex sets is load-bearing for the O(d log d) claim. The manuscript asserts that this characterization ensures observed optimal actions induce only polynomially many distinct linear cuts in objective space. However, the exchange property of M-convex sets can permit exponentially many distinct optimal points, which would leave the arrangement complexity exponential. An explicit proof or reduction showing that the number of effective directions is O(d) is required.

Authors: We appreciate this observation. While M-convex sets can have exponentially many points, the structural characterization (Lemma 3.2 and Theorem 3.3) uses the exchange property to show that differences between optimal solutions are spanned by a basis of size d, limiting distinct linear cuts to O(d). To make this fully explicit as requested, we will add a new lemma (Lemma 3.4) proving that the number of effective directions is at most 2d via reduction to the ground-set size. This preserves the volume argument and the O(d log d) regret bound. revision: yes
Referee: In the corruption-robust extension, the adaptive monitoring of directed graphs to detect up to C corruptions without knowing C is presented, but the analysis must explicitly bound the number of false detections and show how they affect the volume argument to preserve the O((C+1)d log d) regret. The current sketch leaves open whether the graph-based detection introduces additional logarithmic factors or requires stronger assumptions on the corruption model.

Authors: We agree the false-detection analysis needs to be explicit. The directed-graph monitoring detects corruptions via cycle formation. We will add a proposition in Section 5 bounding false detections by at most C (each corruption triggers at most one false positive). Each false detection multiplies volume by a constant factor of 2, preserving the O((C+1)d log d) regret with no extra logarithmic factors. The analysis uses only the standard bounded-C adversarial model and requires no stronger assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation uses external M-convex structural properties and standard volume arguments

full rationale

The paper's O(d log d) finite regret bound is obtained by invoking the known structural characterization of optima over M-convex sets (a standard notion from combinatorial optimization literature) together with a geometric volume argument on the arrangement of hyperplanes. This combination is independent of the paper's own fitted quantities or prior exponential bound. The cited Sakaue et al. 2025 result supplies only the baseline exp(O(d log d)) bound and is not used to justify the new polynomial claim. No equation reduces the output to the input by construction, no parameter is fitted and then relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' own prior work to force the result. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the definition and structural properties of M-convex sets from prior combinatorial optimization literature together with standard geometric volume arguments in online learning analysis.

axioms (1)

domain assumption M-convex sets admit a structural characterization of optimal solutions that enables a geometric volume argument to bound the number of distinct objectives
Invoked directly to obtain the O(d log d) finite bound instead of exponential.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5590 in / 1154 out tokens · 59184 ms · 2026-05-16T08:53:37.198373+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

K., & Orlin, J

Ahuja, R. K., & Orlin, J. B. (2001). Inverse optimization.Operations Research,49(5), 771–783 (cited on page 1)

work page 2001
[2]

Aswani, A., (Max) Shen, Z.-J., & Siddiq, A. (2018). Inverse optimization with noisy data.Operations Research, 66(3), 870–892 (cited on page 3). Bärmann, A., Martin, A., Pokutta, S., & Schneider, O. (2020). An online-learning approach to inverse optimization.arXiv:1810.12997(cited on pages 1, 2). Bärmann, A., Pokutta, S., & Schneider, O. (2017). Emulating ...

work page arXiv 2018
[3]

Bertsimas, D., Gupta, V., & Paschalidis, I. C. (2015). Data-driven estimation in equilibrium using inverse optimization.Mathematical Programming,153(2), 595–633 (cited on page 3)

work page 2015
[4]

Bertsimas, D., & Vempala, S. (2004). Solving convex programs by random walks.Journal of the ACM,51(4), 540–556 (cited on page 8)

work page 2004
[5]

Besbes, O., Fonseca, Y., & Lobel, I. (2021). Online learning from optimal actions.Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Learning Theory,134, 586–586 (cited on page 2)

work page 2021
[6]

Besbes, O., Fonseca, Y., & Lobel, I. (2025). Contextual inverse optimization: Offline and online learning. Operations Research,73(1), 424–443 (cited on page 2)

work page 2025
[7]

R., Hortaçsu, A., & Pavlin, J

Birge, J. R., Hortaçsu, A., & Pavlin, J. M. (2017). Inverse optimization for the recovery of market structure from market outcomes: An application to the MISO electricity market.Operations Research,65(4), 837–855 (cited on page 1)

work page 2017
[8]

Brightwell, G., & Winkler, P. (1991). Counting linear extensions is #P-complete.Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 175–181 (cited on page 9)

work page 1991
[9]

Burton, D., & Toint, P. L. (1992). On an instance of the inverse shortest paths problem.Mathematical Programming,53(1), 45–61 (cited on page 1)

work page 1992
[10]

Chan, T. C. Y., Mahmood, R., & Zhu, I. Y. (2025). Inverse optimization: Theory and applications.Operations Research,73(2), 1046–1074 (cited on page 1)

work page 2025
[11]

X., & Kılınç-Karzan, F

Chen, V. X., & Kılınç-Karzan, F. (2020). Online convex optimization perspective for learning from dynamically revealed preferences.arXiv:2008.10460(cited on page 4)

work page arXiv 2020
[12]

F., Leike, J., Brown, T., Martic, M., Legg, S., & Amodei, D

Christiano, P. F., Leike, J., Brown, T., Martic, M., Legg, S., & Amodei, D. (2017). Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,30, 4299–4307 (cited on page 13)

work page 2017
[13]

Edelsbrunner, H., & Kerber, M. (2012). Dual complexes of cubical subdivisions ofRn.Discrete & Computa- tional Geometry,47(2), 393–414 (cited on page 9). 13

work page 2012
[14]

Feldman, V., Guzman, C., & Vempala, S. (2015). Statistical query algorithms for mean vector estimation and stochastic convex optimization.arXiv:1512.09170(cited on page 9)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[15]

Freudenthal, H. (1942). Simplizialzerlegungen von beschränkter Flachheit.Annals of Mathematics,43(2), 580–582 (cited on page 9)

work page 1942
[16]

Gollapudi, S., Guruganesh, G., Kollias, K., Manurangsi, P., Paes Leme, R., & Schneider, J. (2021). Contextual recommendations and low-regret cutting-plane algorithms.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,34, 22498–22508 (cited on pages 2, 3). Grünbaum, B. (1960). Partitions of mass-distributions and of convex bodies by hyperplanes.Pacific Jour...

work page 2021
[17]

P., & Schneider, J

Gupta, A., Guruganesh, G., Leme, R. P., & Schneider, J. (2025). Robust contextual pricing.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,38, Page numbers are not assigned yet (cited on pages 3, 5)

work page 2025
[18]

Katoh, N., Shioura, A., & Ibaraki, T. (2013). Resource allocation problems. InHandbook of Combinatorial Optimization(pp. 2897–2988). Springer. (cited on page 4)

work page 2013
[19]

Krishnamurthy, A., Lykouris, T., Podimata, C., & Schapire, R. (2021). Contextual search in the presence of irrational agents.Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, 910–918 (cited on pages 3, 5)

work page 2021
[20]

Liu, A., Paes Leme, R., & Schneider, J. (2021). Optimal contextual pricing and extensions.Proceedings of the 2021 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 1059–1078 (cited on page 3). Lovász, L., & Vempala, S. (2006). Simulated annealing in convex bodies and anO∗(n4)volume algorithm. Journal of Computer and System Sciences,72(2), 392–417 (cited on page ...

work page 2021
[21]

(2003).Discrete Convex Analysis

Murota, K. (2003).Discrete Convex Analysis. SIAM. (cited on pages 4–6, 12)

work page 2003
[22]

Murota, K. (2022). Discrete convex analysis: A tool for economics and game theory.arXiv:2212.03598(cited on page 4)

work page arXiv 2022
[23]

Oki, T., & Sakaue, S. (2023). Faster discrete convex function minimization with predictions: The M-convex case.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,36, 68576–68588 (cited on page 4)

work page 2023
[24]

Oki, T., & Sakaue, S. (2024). No-regret M♮-concave function maximization: Stochastic bandit algorithms and NP-hardness of adversarial full-information setting.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,37, 57418–57438 (cited on page 4)

work page 2024
[25]

F., Leike, J., & Lowe, R

Christiano, P. F., Leike, J., & Lowe, R. (2022). Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,35, 27730–27744 (cited on page 13). Paes Leme, R., Podimata, C., & Schneider, J. (2022). Corruption-robust contextual search through density updates.Proceedings of the 35th Conference on Lea...

work page arXiv 2022
[26]

Sun, C., Liu, S., & Li, X. (2023). Maximum optimality margin: A unified approach for contextual linear programming and inverse linear programming.Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning,202, 32886–32912 (cited on page 4)

work page 2023
[27]

Tarantola, A. (1988). Inverse problem theory: Methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation. Geophysical Journal International,94(1), 167–167 (cited on page 1). 15

work page 1988