pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.02608 · v1 · submitted 2026-02-02 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc

Non-Singular Bouncing cosmology from Phantom Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Coupling: Reconstruction with Observational Insights

Khandro K. Chokyi , Surajit Chattopadhyay This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 08:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qc
keywords non-singular bouncephantom scalar fieldGauss-Bonnet couplingbulk viscosityscale factor reconstructionnull energy conditionPantheon+ dataobservational constraints
0
0 comments X

The pith

A phantom scalar field coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet term with bulk viscosity reconstructs a non-singular bouncing cosmology consistent with supernova and inflation data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors reconstruct the scalar potential for a phantom field non-minimally coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet invariant by adopting a scale-factor ansatz that creates a smooth bounce without singularity. Bulk viscosity is introduced to control the post-bounce expansion, producing a positive squared speed of sound and preventing the divergences that appear in the non-viscous version. The resulting energy density and pressure violate the null energy condition around the bounce point as required for the transition from contraction to expansion, while a temporary violation of the strong energy condition also occurs. Markov-chain Monte Carlo fitting of the model parameters to Pantheon+ supernova data yields a reduced chi-squared of 0.995, and the slow-roll parameters extracted from the potential fall inside the 68 percent confidence contours reported by Planck 2018.

Core claim

Using the scale factor ansatz α(t)=(α/η + t²)^{1/(2η)}, the scalar potential V(t) is reconstructed for the phantom field coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet term. The model exhibits the null-energy-condition violation necessary for a bounce, and inclusion of bulk viscosity produces a smooth positive squared speed of sound throughout the evolution. Bayesian analysis against Pantheon+ data confirms that the best-fit parameters are observationally viable, while the derived inflation observables remain consistent with Planck 2018 limits.

What carries the argument

The reconstructed scalar potential V(t) obtained from the phantom scalar-Gauss-Bonnet coupling under the quadratic scale-factor ansatz, stabilized by bulk viscosity to remove divergences at the bounce.

If this is right

  • The model produces the null-energy-condition violation required to reverse contraction into expansion at the bounce.
  • Bulk viscosity keeps the squared speed of sound positive and smooth, eliminating the divergences found in the non-viscous case.
  • MCMC fitting to Pantheon+ data yields a reduced chi-squared of 0.995 with parameters that also satisfy Planck 2018 inflation constraints.
  • Energy-condition analysis shows only temporary violations in the viscous scenario, in contrast to persistent violations without viscosity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The stabilising role of viscosity could be tested by applying the same reconstruction technique to other modified-gravity bounce models.
  • The smooth potential well at the bounce may leave distinct imprints on the tensor spectrum that future gravitational-wave detectors could distinguish from pure inflation.
  • Extending the reconstruction to include radiation or matter fluids would show whether the bounce can connect directly to a standard hot big-bang phase without additional tuning.

Load-bearing premise

The scale factor must follow the exact quadratic form α(t)=(α/η + t²)^{1/(2η)} to generate the non-singular bounce and permit stable reconstruction of the potential.

What would settle it

Detection of a negative squared speed of sound near the bounce point or a fit to Pantheon+ luminosity distances that produces a reduced chi-squared substantially larger than one would rule out the model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.02608 by Khandro K. Chokyi, Surajit Chattopadhyay.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Evolution of a, H and q against cosmic time t for different values of α. In Fig. 1a, we have pictorially depicted the bouncing scale factor. In Fig. 1b, the behaviour of H is explored. The evolving pattern of H(t) around the bouncing point t = 0 shows the symmetric and nonsingular behaviour. For the scale factor under consideration, in the pre-bounce regime (t < 0), H(t) appears to be negative, indicating … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Behaviour of the reconstructed V (t) plotted against cosmic time t. We have taken ϕ0 = 0.07, n = 2, f0 = 0.04, h = 0.06, ρm0 = 0.45, α = 0.2506, η = 1.0924, m = 0.08, C1 = 10.6, λ = 0.008, B = 1.006 and ρc = 0.05. and crosses 0 at the bouncing point t = 0. Following this, it continues to increase in the expanding (t > 0) phase. This transient negative behaviour of density is expected within the context of … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Behaviour of the reconstructed density and EoS parameter( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The reconstructed pressure and the EoS parameter( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Energy conditions plotted against cosmic time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Variation of the squared speed of sound for the non-viscous and viscous models, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distance Modulus Hubble diagram for the Pantheon+ SNe Ia sample fitted with the modified expansion model. The blue curve represents the best-fit parameters (α = 0.2506, η = 1.0924, H0 = 64.217 km s−1 Mpc−1 , M = −19.539), while the gray points with error bars denote the observed distance moduli. The lower panel shows the residuals, which scatter symmetrically around zero, indicating that the model provides… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: MCMC Constraints and Degeneracies from Pantheon+ Data. Marginalized one- and two-dimensional posterior distributions for the model parameters (α, η, H0, M) derived from the MCMC chain. The diagonal panels show the one-dimensional posterior histograms, with the median (solid line) and 68% confidence intervals, indicated by dashed lines. The off-diagonal panels display the joint 1σ and 2σ contours, highlight… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The scalar spectral index ns and the tensor-to-scalar ratio r value predicted by the Best-Fit Model Prediction , which is denoted by the red ⋆. Colored contours represent 68% and 95% confidence level (CL) observational bounds. Reference lines are at ns ≈ 0.965 (dashed black) and r < 0.07 (dashed green) scale factor incorporated into the Gauss–Bonnet scalar field framework is shown to be able to generate in… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We examine non-singular bounce cosmology within the framework of a phantom scalar field coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet term in both non-viscous and bulk-viscous cases. Using the scale factor ansatz $\alpha(t)=\left(\frac{\alpha}{\eta}+t^2\right)^{\frac{1}{2 \eta}}$, we reconstruct the scalar field potential $V(t)$, and observe a smooth potential well centered at the bounce point. The resulting energy density, pressure, and equation-of-state parameter show NEC violation necessary for successful bounce, while viscosity controls post-bounce dynamics with a positive and smooth squared speed of sound. In contrast, for the non-viscous model, sharp divergences occur just at the bounce and continues to be negative in the expanding phase, which in turn emphasises the stabilising role of dissipative effects. The energy condition analysis indicates a temporary NEC and SEC violation in the viscous scenario, whereas its persistent violation within the non-viscous model suggests a continuous accelerated expansion. Observational viability is found through Bayesian MCMC fitting in regards to the Pantheon+ supernova data, with best-fit parameters providing a reduced chi-squared of $\chi_{red}^2 =0.995$ while the inflation observables derived from the reconstructed potential place our model predictions inside $68\%$ CL Planck 2018 confidence contours. Our findings suggest that bounce cosmologies could offer a physically reasonable and observationally acceptable alternative or pre-inflationary scenario, while highlighting the role that viscosity could play for a stable and smooth cosmological evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper examines non-singular bouncing cosmology in a phantom scalar field coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet term, with and without bulk viscosity. By adopting the scale factor ansatz α(t) = (α/η + t²)^{1/(2η)}, the scalar potential is reconstructed, showing a smooth well at the bounce. Energy conditions indicate NEC violation at the bounce, viscosity ensures positive squared speed of sound, MCMC fitting to Pantheon+ data gives χ_red² = 0.995, and inflation observables fall within Planck 2018 68% CL contours.

Significance. If the results hold, this provides a specific example of a stable bouncing model in modified gravity that is observationally viable, suggesting bounce cosmologies as alternatives or precursors to inflation, with viscosity playing a key stabilizing role.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2] The scale factor ansatz α(t)=(α/η + t²)^{1/(2η)} is introduced to produce the desired non-singular bounce with a_min > 0 and ḣ(0)=0 by construction. No derivation from the field equations demonstrates that this form is dynamically preferred, making the reconstruction dependent on this choice.
  2. [§4] The two parameters η and α are determined via MCMC fit to late-time Pantheon+ supernova data. These same parameters are then used to compute early-universe inflation observables. The manuscript does not verify consistency across intermediate epochs such as radiation or matter domination that would follow the bounce.
  3. [§5] Although the squared speed of sound is reported positive and smooth with bulk viscosity, no linear perturbation analysis is supplied to confirm stability of scalar modes when the best-fit viscosity coefficient is used, especially near the bounce where the null energy condition is violated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The scale factor is denoted by α(t), which conflicts with the parameter α in the ansatz; a distinct symbol for the parameter would improve readability.
  2. [§3] Explicit steps for solving the modified Friedmann equations for V(t) and the GB coupling from the ansatz would enhance reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive comments on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each point and provide our responses below, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] The scale factor ansatz α(t)=(α/η + t²)^{1/(2η)} is introduced to produce the desired non-singular bounce with a_min > 0 and ḣ(0)=0 by construction. No derivation from the field equations demonstrates that this form is dynamically preferred, making the reconstruction dependent on this choice.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation regarding the scale factor ansatz. This form is selected as it satisfies the necessary conditions for a non-singular bounce by construction, namely a positive minimum scale factor and vanishing Hubble parameter at t=0. Such ansatzes are commonly employed in the literature on bouncing cosmologies to facilitate reconstruction of the scalar potential. We will revise §2 to include a more detailed motivation for this choice and cite relevant references where similar approaches are used. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] The two parameters η and α are determined via MCMC fit to late-time Pantheon+ supernova data. These same parameters are then used to compute early-universe inflation observables. The manuscript does not verify consistency across intermediate epochs such as radiation or matter domination that would follow the bounce.

    Authors: The referee correctly points out that the parameters are constrained by late-time data and then applied to early-universe observables. We acknowledge that this does not explicitly verify the evolution through intermediate epochs like radiation and matter domination. The present study focuses on the bounce phase and its late-time observational fit, with inflation parameters derived as a consistency check. We will update the discussion to clarify this limitation and the assumptions involved. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [§5] Although the squared speed of sound is reported positive and smooth with bulk viscosity, no linear perturbation analysis is supplied to confirm stability of scalar modes when the best-fit viscosity coefficient is used, especially near the bounce where the null energy condition is violated.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for linear perturbation analysis. While the positive squared speed of sound suggests stability against gradient instabilities, a complete analysis of scalar mode perturbations, especially near the bounce, would indeed provide stronger confirmation. Such an analysis is computationally intensive and lies beyond the current scope. We will add a statement in §5 noting this and indicating it as a direction for future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Non-singular bounce imposed by scale-factor ansatz; reconstruction and observational fits follow from it

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "Using the scale factor ansatz α(t)=(α/η + t²)^{1/(2η)}, we reconstruct the scalar field potential V(t), and observe a smooth potential well centered at the bounce point. The resulting energy density, pressure, and equation-of-state parameter show NEC violation necessary for successful bounce, while viscosity controls post-bounce dynamics with a positive and smooth squared speed of sound."

    The ansatz is constructed so that α(0) > 0 and dα/dt|_(t=0) = 0 by algebraic design; the non-singular bounce, the location of the potential minimum, and the NEC violation at t = 0 are therefore properties of the input scale factor rather than solutions obtained from the phantom scalar–Gauss-Bonnet field equations.

full rationale

The paper selects the scale-factor form α(t)=(α/η + t²)^{1/(2η)} explicitly to guarantee a_min > 0 and ḣ(0) = 0 at the bounce point. All subsequent steps—reconstruction of V(t) and the GB coupling from the modified Friedmann equations, demonstration of NEC violation, introduction of bulk viscosity to stabilize c_s², and MCMC fitting of the same parameters to Pantheon+—operate on quantities already fixed by this ansatz. The inflation observables are then computed from the resulting potential using the best-fit values, so the claimed consistency with Planck contours is a consistency check on an input functional form rather than an independent derivation. This matches the self-definitional pattern: the central non-singular feature is built into the starting assumption and does not emerge from the dynamics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on an assumed functional form for the scale factor, the phantom-field equation of state, and the standard coupling of the scalar to the Gauss-Bonnet term; parameters in the ansatz are adjusted to data.

free parameters (2)
  • η
    Exponent in the scale-factor ansatz that controls the duration and smoothness of the bounce.
  • α
    Prefactor in the scale-factor ansatz.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Phantom scalar field possesses a negative kinetic term, permitting w < -1
    Invoked to achieve the NEC violation required for a bounce.
  • domain assumption Gauss-Bonnet term can be coupled to the scalar field without introducing ghosts or instabilities
    Standard assumption in scalar-tensor modified gravity models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5586 in / 1575 out tokens · 36526 ms · 2026-05-16T08:44:54.696498+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Study of Non-Singular Bounce in Myrzakulov-type $f(R,T)$ Gravity with Chaplygin Gas

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Negative quadratic trace parameter β in f(R,T) = R + αT + βT² gravity with Chaplygin gas enables non-singular bounces via geometric NEC violation without exotic matter, with viable stability and de Sitter attractor.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 120 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Inflation and the new era of high precision cosmology

    Alan H Guth. Inflation and the new era of high precision cosmology. Physics@ MIT, pages 28–39, 2002

    work page 2002

  2. [2]

    Physical foundations of cosmology

    Viatcheslav Mukhanov. Physical foundations of cosmology . Cambridge university press, 2005

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    Primordial cosmology

    Patrick Peter and Jean-Philippe Uzan. Primordial cosmology. Oxford University Press, 2009

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    The inflationary universe

    Alan H Guth. The inflationary universe. In Cosmology, pages 411–446. CRC Press, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Particle physics and inflationary cosmology

    Andrei Linde. Particle physics and inflationary cosmology. arXiv preprint hep- th/0503203, 2005

    work page arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    Inflationary cosmology

    George Lazarides. Inflationary cosmology. In Cosmological Crossroads: An Advanced Course in Mathematical, Physical and String Cosmology , pages 351–391. Springer, 2002

    work page 2002

  7. [7]

    Singularities in inflationary cosmology: A review

    Arvind Borde and Alexander Vilenkin. Singularities in inflationary cosmology: A review. International Journal of Modern Physics D , 5(06):813–824, 1996

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    Bouncing cosmology made simple

    Anna Ijjas and Paul J Steinhardt. Bouncing cosmology made simple. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 35(13):135004, 2018

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Cosmological singularity and the creation of the universe

    Michael Heller. Cosmological singularity and the creation of the universe. Zygon®, 35(3):665–685, 2000

    work page 2000

  10. [10]

    A Thousand Problems in Cosmology: Horizons

    Yu L Bolotin and IV Tanatarov. A thousand problems in cosmology: Horizons. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.6329 , 2013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  11. [11]

    Arguments against the flatness problem in classical cosmology: a review

    Phillip Helbig. Arguments against the flatness problem in classical cosmology: a review. The European Physical Journal H , 46(1):10, 2021

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    A critical review of classical bouncing cosmolo- gies

    Diana Battefeld and Patrick Peter. A critical review of classical bouncing cosmolo- gies. Physics Reports, 571:1–66, 2015

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Exploring bouncing cosmologies with cosmological surveys

    Yi-Fu Cai. Exploring bouncing cosmologies with cosmological surveys. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy , 57:1414–1430, 2014

    work page 2014

  14. [14]

    Has the universe always expanded? Physical Review D , 65(2):023513, 2001

    Patrick Peter and Nelson Pinto-Neto. Has the universe always expanded? Physical Review D , 65(2):023513, 2001

    work page 2001

  15. [15]

    The null energy condition and its violation

    Valerii A Rubakov. The null energy condition and its violation. Physics-Uspekhi, 57(2):128, 2014

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology

    Stephen William Hawking and Roger Penrose. The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences , 314(1519):529–548, 1970

    work page 1970

  17. [17]

    Primordial perturbations in a nonsingular bouncing universe model

    Patrick Peter and Nelson Pinto-Neto. Primordial perturbations in a nonsingular bouncing universe model. Physical Review D , 66(6):063509, 2002. 36

    work page 2002

  18. [18]

    The phantom menaced: Con- straints on low-energy effective ghosts

    James M Cline, Sangyong Jeon, and Guy D Moore. The phantom menaced: Con- straints on low-energy effective ghosts. Physical Review D , 70(4):043543, 2004

    work page 2004

  19. [19]

    Modified theories of gravity: Why, how and what? General Relativity and Gravitation , 54(5):44, 2022

    S Shankaranarayanan and Joseph P Johnson. Modified theories of gravity: Why, how and what? General Relativity and Gravitation , 54(5):44, 2022

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Teleparallel gravity: an introduction , volume

    Ruben Aldrovandi and Jose G Pereira. Teleparallel gravity: an introduction , volume

    work page

  21. [21]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    f (t) teleparallel gravity and cosmology

    Yi-Fu Cai, Salvatore Capozziello, Mariafelicia De Laurentis, and Emmanuel N Sari- dakis. f (t) teleparallel gravity and cosmology. Reports on Progress in Physics , 79(10):106901, 2016

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Cosmography of f (r) gravity

    Salvatore Capozziello, VF Cardone, and V Salzano. Cosmography of f (r) gravity. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology , 78(6):063504, 2008

    work page 2008

  24. [24]

    f (r) theories of gravity

    Thomas P Sotiriou and Valerio Faraoni. f (r) theories of gravity. Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(1):451–497, 2010

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    Brane-world gravity

    Roy Maartens and Kazuya Koyama. Brane-world gravity. Living Reviews in Rela- tivity, 13:1–124, 2010

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    Horndeski theory and beyond: a review

    Tsutomu Kobayashi. Horndeski theory and beyond: a review. Reports on Progress in Physics , 82(8):086901, 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    The scalar-tensor theory of gravitation

    Yasunori Fujii and Kei-ichi Maeda. The scalar-tensor theory of gravitation . Cam- bridge University Press, 2003

    work page 2003

  28. [28]

    Phantom cosmologies

    Vinod B Johri. Phantom cosmologies. Physical Review D , 70(4):041303, 2004

    work page 2004

  29. [29]

    Curvature squared terms and string theories

    Barton Zwiebach. Curvature squared terms and string theories. Physics Letters B , 156(5-6):315–317, 1985

    work page 1985

  30. [30]

    The quartic effective action for the heterotic string

    David J Gross and John H Sloan. The quartic effective action for the heterotic string. Nuclear Physics B , 291:41–89, 1987

    work page 1987

  31. [31]

    Characterization of the lovelock gravity by bianchi derivative

    Naresh Dadhich. Characterization of the lovelock gravity by bianchi derivative. Pramana, 74:875–882, 2010

    work page 2010

  32. [32]

    The 4d einstein–gauss–bonnet theory of gravity: a review

    Pedro GS Fernandes, Pedro Carrilho, Timothy Clifton, and David J Mulryne. The 4d einstein–gauss–bonnet theory of gravity: a review. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 39(6):063001, 2022

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    The einstein tensor and its generalizations

    David Lovelock. The einstein tensor and its generalizations. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 12(3):498–501, 1971

    work page 1971

  34. [34]

    The Theorem of Ostrogradsky

    Richard P Woodard. The theorem of ostrogradsky. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02210, 2015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  35. [35]

    Cosmology and astrophysical constraints of gauss– bonnet dark energy

    Tomi Koivisto and David F Mota. Cosmology and astrophysical constraints of gauss– bonnet dark energy. Physics Letters B , 644(2-3):104–108, 2007. 37

    work page 2007

  36. [36]

    The fate of (phantom) dark energy universe with string curvature corrections

    Mohammad Sami, Alexey Toporensky, Peter V Tretjakov, and Shinji Tsujikawa. The fate of (phantom) dark energy universe with string curvature corrections. Physics Letters B , 619(3-4):193–200, 2005

    work page 2005

  37. [37]

    The scalar-torsion gravity corrections in the first-order inflationary models

    IV Fomin, SV Chervon, LK Duchaniya, and B Mishra. The scalar-torsion gravity corrections in the first-order inflationary models. Physics of the Dark Universe , 48:101895, 2025

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Viable inflation in scalar-gauss-bonnet gravity and reconstruction from observational indices

    SD Odintsov and VK Oikonomou. Viable inflation in scalar-gauss-bonnet gravity and reconstruction from observational indices. Physical Review D , 98(4):044039, 2018

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Supriyadi and G

    I. Supriyadi and G. Hikmawan. Inflation with Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet, non-minimal, and non-minimal derivative couplings: the constant-roll condition. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 2243:012095, 2022

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    Inflation driven by einstein-gauss-bonnet gravity

    Sumanta Chakraborty, Tanmoy Paul, and Soumitra SenGupta. Inflation driven by einstein-gauss-bonnet gravity. Physical Review D , 98(8):083539, 2018

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Einstein–gauss–bonnet cosmological theories at reheating and at the end of the inflationary era

    VK Oikonomou, Pyotr Tsyba, and Olga Razina. Einstein–gauss–bonnet cosmological theories at reheating and at the end of the inflationary era. Annals of Physics , 462:169597, 2024

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Emergent cosmology in 4d einstein gauss bonnet theory of gravity

    Mrinnoy M Gohain and Kalyan Bhuyan. Emergent cosmology in 4d einstein gauss bonnet theory of gravity. Physica Scripta, 99(7):075306, 2024

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Non-minimally coupled einstein–gauss–bonnet inflation phenomenology in view of gw170817

    Sergei D Odintsov, Vasilis K Oikonomou, and FP Fronimos. Non-minimally coupled einstein–gauss–bonnet inflation phenomenology in view of gw170817. Annals of Physics, 420:168250, 2020

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Gauss–bonnet inflation after planck2018

    Narges Rashidi and Kourosh Nozari. Gauss–bonnet inflation after planck2018. The Astrophysical Journal, 890(1):58, 2020

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Warm-tachyon gauss–bonnet infla- tion in the light of planck 2015 data

    Meysam Motaharfar and Hamid Reza Sepangi. Warm-tachyon gauss–bonnet infla- tion in the light of planck 2015 data. The European Physical Journal C , 76:1–14, 2016

    work page 2015

  46. [46]

    String-inspired cosmology: a late time transition from a scaling matter era to a dark energyuniverse caused by a gauss–bonnet coupling

    Shinji Tsujikawa and M Sami. String-inspired cosmology: a late time transition from a scaling matter era to a dark energyuniverse caused by a gauss–bonnet coupling. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , 2007(01):006, 2007

    work page 2007

  47. [47]

    A voiding big rip singularities in phantom scalar field theory with gauss-bonnet term

    Giannis Papagiannopoulos, Genly Leon, and Andronikos Paliathanasis. A voiding big rip singularities in phantom scalar field theory with gauss-bonnet term. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18392, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Chameleon fields: Awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space

    Justin Khoury and Amanda Weltman. Chameleon fields: Awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space. Physical review letters , 93(17):171104, 2004

    work page 2004

  49. [49]

    Chameleon cosmology

    Justin Khoury and Amanda Weltman. Chameleon cosmology. Physical Review D , 69(4):044026, 2004. 38

    work page 2004

  50. [50]

    Probing aether scalar tensor theory through bouncing cosmologies

    Shamaila Rani, Nadeem Azhar, Aneesa Majeed, and Abdul Jawad. Probing aether scalar tensor theory through bouncing cosmologies. International Journal of Geo- metric Methods in Modern Physics , page 2550171, 2025

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Bouncing cosmology in modified gauss–bonnet gravity

    Kazuharu Bamba, Andrey N Makarenko, Alexandr N Myagky, and Sergei D Odintsov. Bouncing cosmology in modified gauss–bonnet gravity. Physics Letters B, 732:349–355, 2014

    work page 2014

  52. [52]

    Bounce universe from string-inspired gauss-bonnet gravity

    Kazuharu Bamba, Andrey N Makarenko, Alexandr N Myagky, and Sergei D Odintsov. Bounce universe from string-inspired gauss-bonnet gravity. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , 2015(04):001, 2015

    work page 2015

  53. [53]

    Unifi- cation of a bounce with a viable dark energy era in gauss-bonnet gravity

    Sergei D Odintsov, Vasilis K Oikonomou, FP Fronimos, and KV Fasoulakos. Unifi- cation of a bounce with a viable dark energy era in gauss-bonnet gravity. Physical Review D , 102(10):104042, 2020

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    Singular bouncing cosmology from gauss-bonnet modified gravity

    VK Oikonomou. Singular bouncing cosmology from gauss-bonnet modified gravity. Physical Review D , 92(12):124027, 2015

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    Bounce Loop Quantum Cosmology Corrected Gauss-Bonnet Gravity

    J Haro, AN Makarenko, AN Myagky, SD Odintsov, and VK Oikonomou. Bounce loop quantum cosmology corrected gauss-bonnet gravity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.08273, 2015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    Probing bounce dy- namics via higher-order gauss-bonnet modifications

    M Ilyas, Fawad Khan, Iftikhar Ahmad, and Syeda Eman Rubab. Probing bounce dy- namics via higher-order gauss-bonnet modifications. Physica Scripta , 99(1):015018, 2023

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Bouncing universe in gauss-bonnet gravity

    JK Singh, Kazuharu Bamba, et al. Bouncing universe in gauss-bonnet gravity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06210, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Generalized holographic dark en- ergy and bouncing cosmology in gauss–bonnet gravity

    Andrey N Makarenko and Alexander N Myagky. Generalized holographic dark en- ergy and bouncing cosmology in gauss–bonnet gravity. International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics , 15(06):1850096, 2018

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Braneworld dynamics in einstein- gauss-bonnet gravity

    Hideki Maeda, Varun Sahni, and Yuri Shtanov. Braneworld dynamics in einstein- gauss-bonnet gravity. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cos- mology, 76(10):104028, 2007

    work page 2007

  60. [60]

    Reconstruction method applied to bounce cosmology and inflationary scenarios in cosmological f (g) gravity

    MG Ganiou, MJS Houndjo, C Aïnamon, L Ayivi, and A Kanfon. Reconstruction method applied to bounce cosmology and inflationary scenarios in cosmological f (g) gravity. The European Physical Journal Plus , 137(2):208, 2022

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    Akrami and the Planck Collaboration

    Y. Akrami and the Planck Collaboration. Planck 2018 results. x. constraints on inflation. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 641:A10, 2020

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Riess, et al

    Dan Scolnic, Dillon Brout, Anthony G. Riess, et al. The pantheon+ analysis: The full dataset and light-curve release. The Astrophysical Journal , 938(2):115, 2022

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    The pantheon+ analysis: cosmological constraints

    Dillon Brout, Dan Scolnic, Brodie Popovic, Adam G Riess, Anthony Carr, Joe Zuntz, Rick Kessler, Tamara M Davis, Samuel Hinton, David Jones, et al. The pantheon+ analysis: cosmological constraints. The Astrophysical Journal , 938(2):110, 2022. 39

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the hubble constant with 1 km s- 1 mpc- 1 uncertainty from the hubble space telescope and the sh0es team

    Adam G Riess, Wenlong Yuan, Lucas M Macri, Dan Scolnic, Dillon Brout, Stefano Casertano, David O Jones, Yukei Murakami, Gagandeep S Anand, Louise Breuval, et al. A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the hubble constant with 1 km s- 1 mpc- 1 uncertainty from the hubble space telescope and the sh0es team. The Astrophysical journal letters , 934...

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    Cosmological inflation with einstein–gauss–bonnet gravity

    IV Fomin. Cosmological inflation with einstein–gauss–bonnet gravity. Physics of Particles and Nuclei , 49:525–529, 2018

    work page 2018

  66. [66]

    Global dynamics in einstein-gauss-bonnet scalar field cosmology with matter

    Alfredo D Millano, Genly Leon, and Andronikos Paliathanasis. Global dynamics in einstein-gauss-bonnet scalar field cosmology with matter. Physical Review D , 108(2):023519, 2023

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov. Modified gauss-bonnet theory as gravitational alter- native for dark energy. Physics Letters B , 631(1):1–6, 2005

    work page 2005

  68. [68]

    Dent, Sourish Dutta, and Emmanuel N

    Yi-Fu Cai, Shih-Hung Chen, James B. Dent, Sourish Dutta, and Emmanuel N. Saridakis. Bounce cosmology from f(t) gravity. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 28(21):215011, 2011

    work page 2011

  69. [69]

    Odintsov, Diego Sáez-Gómez, and Shin’ichi Nojiri

    Kazuharu Bamba, Sergei D. Odintsov, Diego Sáez-Gómez, and Shin’ichi Nojiri. Phantom cosmology: theoretical developments and observational bounds. Entropy, 16(4):2100–2124, 2014

    work page 2014

  70. [70]

    Role of deceleration parameter and interacting dark energy in singularity avoidance

    Abdussattar and SR Prajapati. Role of deceleration parameter and interacting dark energy in singularity avoidance. Astrophysics and Space Science , 331:657–663, 2011

    work page 2011

  71. [71]

    New agegraphic dark energy model in chameleon brans-dicke cosmology for different forms of the scale factor

    Antonio Pasqua and Surajit Chattopadhyay. New agegraphic dark energy model in chameleon brans-dicke cosmology for different forms of the scale factor. Astrophysics and Space Science , 348(1):283–291, 2013

    work page 2013

  72. [72]

    Cosmological scale factor in the relational approach

    AB Molchanov. Cosmological scale factor in the relational approach. Metaphysics, (2):38–48, 2023

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    Cosmological general relativity with scale factor and dark energy

    Firmin J Oliveira. Cosmological general relativity with scale factor and dark energy. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , 53(11):3856–3881, 2014

    work page 2014

  74. [74]

    Comprehensive study of bouncing cosmological models in f (q, t) theory

    M Zeeshan Gul, M Sharif, and Shamraiza Shabbir. Comprehensive study of bouncing cosmological models in f (q, t) theory. The European Physical Journal C , 84(8):802, 2024

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    Bouncing cosmology in an extended theory of gravity

    Sunil Kumar Tripathy, Rakesh Kumar Khuntia, and Priyabrata Parida. Bouncing cosmology in an extended theory of gravity. The European Physical Journal Plus , 134(10):504, 2019

    work page 2019

  76. [76]

    Cosmological bounce and some other solutions in exponential gravity

    Pritha Bari, Kaushik Bhattacharya, and Saikat Chakraborty. Cosmological bounce and some other solutions in exponential gravity. Universe, 4(10):105, 2018

    work page 2018

  77. [77]

    Perfect Quantum Cosmological Bounce

    Steffen Gielen and Neil Turok. A perfect bounce. arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.00699 , 2015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  78. [78]

    Bouncing scenario with causal cosmology

    PS Debnath and BC Paul. Bouncing scenario with causal cosmology. Astrophysics and Space Science , 366(3):32, 2021. 40

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    Analysis of cosmic bounce solutions and entropy evolution beyond general relativity

    M Sharif, M Zeeshan Gul, and Ahmad Nawaz. Analysis of cosmic bounce solutions and entropy evolution beyond general relativity. Physics Letters A , page 130937, 2025

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    The matter bounce curvaton scenario

    Yi-Fu Cai, Robert Brandenberger, and Xinmin Zhang. The matter bounce curvaton scenario. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , 2011(03):003, 2011

    work page 2011

Showing first 80 references.