Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Stealthy hyperuniform metasurfaces suppress diffuse light far more weakly than ideal structure-factor predictions, and the paper argues the dominant cause is electromagnetic multiple scattering between neighboring scatterers—not fabrication

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 05:21 UTC pith:LUPGOY63

load-bearing objection Solid experimental decomposition of why SHU metasurface quenching falls short of structure-factor predictions, but the 'intrinsic multiple-scattering bound' claim leans on N=26 RCWA supercells with no demonstrated supercell-size convergence. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2602.02637 v2 pith:LUPGOY63 submitted 2026-02-02 physics.optics

Extrinsic Limitations of Stealthy Hyperuniform devices

Yuhao Xu , Miao Chen , Louis Forestier , Franck Carcenac , Laurent Mazenq , Philippe Lalanne This is my paper
classification physics.optics
keywords stealthy hyperuniformmetasurfacequenching efficiencystructure factormultiple scatteringpolydispersityfinite-size effectsdiffuse scattering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tests a promise of stealthy hyperuniform (SHU) metasurfaces: that a specially disordered pattern of scatterers can suppress diffuse light over a controlled angular window almost as completely as a periodic structure, with predicted quenching efficiencies above 10^5. Fabricating silicon-nanobox SHU metasurfaces and measuring their angle-resolved scattering, the authors confirm the predicted angular width of the quenching zone but find actual suppression factors of only roughly 10 to 30, at best 70. They trace the shortfall to three mechanisms: finite illumination and pattern size, size polydispersity of the metaatoms, and multiple scattering between neighbors. They argue that multiple scattering is the decisive, intrinsic limit: even with infinitely many identical metaatoms, electromagnetic coupling prevents the structure factor from imprinting itself on scattered light. If this is right, the practical ceiling for this class of devices is orders of magnitude below the ideal, and design must shift from positioning points to engineering the metaatom interaction.

Core claim

The central claim is that the structure-factor description of SHU metasurfaces—scattered intensity equals a per-particle form factor times a pattern structure factor—fails as a predictor of quenching efficiency because it assumes identical, independently scattering metaatoms. The paper shows experimentally that the angular threshold follows the predicted quenching equation, yet the depth of suppression is 10^3 to 10^4 times weaker than ideal. Quantitatively, finite-size effects reduce the ideal efficiency from about 10^5 to about 10^3; polydispersity of the fabricated nanoboxes, mainly through phase fluctuations of the scattered field near the metaatom resonance, further reduces it to about

What carries the argument

The central object is the structure factor S_r(q) = (1/N)|Σ exp(-i q·r_p)|^2 and its partner, the quenching equation q_max ≈ 4√(πρχ), which sets the angular width of the suppression zone. Design assumes factorization: scattered intensity equals a per-particle form factor times the structure factor. The paper's analysis works by relaxing the two hidden assumptions—identical scatterers and no coupling—introducing a polydisperse weighted structure factor with complex per-particle weights, and comparing independent-scattering-approximation results with full-wave rigorous coupled-wave simulations. The quenching efficiency, defined as the reduction of diffuse intensity inside versus outside the qu

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that multiple scattering is an intrinsic limit in the thermodynamic limit rests on full-wave simulations of only 26 metaatoms per supercell, with no convergence study over supercell size or particle number; if those small samples misrepresent macroscopic disorder, the central attribution weakens.

What would settle it

Compute the quenching efficiency with full-wave simulations for SHU supercells of increasing size (e.g., 26, 100, and 400 identical scatterers at fixed density and degree of stealthiness). If the efficiency rises toward the structure-factor prediction as the number of scatterers grows, the claimed thermodynamic-limit bottleneck is wrong; if it plateaus near 10^2, the multiple-scattering ceiling is confirmed.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • SHU metasurface designs that rely solely on structure-factor optimization will not reach their predicted diffuse-light suppression; multiple scattering sets a ceiling that pattern generators cannot remove.
  • The measured quenching equation remains a reliable design rule for where the suppression zone lies, even though its depth is limited.
  • High metaatom density is not a free tuning knob: density increases worsen multiple-scattering degradation, so the density–stealthiness tradeoff must be re-optimized.
  • Applications needing only 10–100× suppression, such as some solar light-management scenarios, can still benefit, while display-type uses that need high suppression may not.
  • Non-resonant or tailored metaatom shapes may mitigate polydispersity and coupling, but at the cost of a reduced diffuse-light signal.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If multiple scattering is indeed the thermodynamic-limit bottleneck, analogous structure-factor-based designs in acoustics, phononics, and neutron scattering should show similar ceilings whenever scatterers are not deeply subwavelength or weakly scattering—an extension the paper only gestures at.
  • The thermodynamic-limit conclusion would be strengthened by a convergence study over supercell size; the current evidence uses 26-particle supercells, so the intrinsic status is an extrapolation from small simulated samples.
  • A testable design extension: metaatoms engineered to have suppressed near-field coupling, for example Huygens-type scatterers at the operating wavelength, should push the multiple-scattering ceiling upward if the mechanism is near-field coupling.
  • The polydispersity result implies that operating near a metaatom resonance amplifies fabrication tolerances; moving away from resonance trades suppression depth for robustness, suggesting a practical window worth optimizing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental and numerical study of two-dimensional stealthy hyperuniform (SHU) optical metasurfaces. The authors fabricate silicon-nanobox metasurfaces with controlled density ρ and stealthiness χ, measure their BRDFs, and show that the angular location of the scattering-quenching transition follows the predicted quenching equation sin θmax = 2√(ρ χ / π) λ. However, the measured quenching efficiency is only of order 10–100, far below the ~10^5 suppressor implied by ideal structure-factor calculations. The discrepancy is analyzed through three mechanisms: finite-size effects, metaatom polydispersity, and multiple scattering. Using structure-factor calculations, measured size distributions, and RCWA simulations on small supercells, the authors conclude that multiple scattering imposes an intrinsic thermodynamic-limit bound on SHU metasurface performance.

Significance. If fully substantiated, the paper provides an important practical correction to the SHU-metasurface literature: structure-factor-based predictions of very large quenching efficiencies cannot be achieved in realistic devices, and the practical bound is closer to ~10–100. The strengths of the work are the systematic experimental sample library, the independent validation of the quenching equation over a range of (ρ, χ), and the use of separate computational tools for polydispersity (COMSOL/RETOP) and multiple scattering (RETICOLO/RCWA). The central quantitative claim, however, relies on a small-supercell RCWA calculation with no supercell-size convergence, and the figure of merit itself is not precisely defined in the main text. These issues are fixable but need to be addressed before the thermodynamic-limit conclusion can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5, Fig. 6] The conclusion that multiple scattering is an intrinsic thermodynamic-limit bottleneck rests entirely on RCWA simulations with N=26 metaatoms per supercell. At ρ=3 μm^-2 the supercell side is L≈2.94 μm≈5.5λ, so every metaatom has coherent periodic replica images at distance L. The manuscript reports no convergence study over N or L at fixed ρ and χ; the cited SI 'convergence tests' appear to concern the 81×81 Fourier-harmonic truncation, not supercell size. The five-order-of-magnitude RCWA/ISA gap in Fig. 6(d,e) can therefore not be unambiguously attributed to intrinsic multiple scattering in a macroscopic disordered sample. Please provide a supercell-size convergence study (e.g., N=26, 100, 400 at fixed density and stealthiness) or otherwise quantify the periodic-replica contribution; alternatively, restrict the claim to the finite supercell geometry.
  2. [Sections 2 and 5, Figs. 3 and 6] The central figure of merit, the 'quenching efficiency', is never defined by an equation. The text says it is the reduction in scattered intensity per solid angle inside the quenching zone relative to outside it, but it does not specify how the inside/outside angular intervals are chosen, how the specular (0,0) order is handled, how experimental BRDF data are converted to this ratio, or how the RCWA discrete diffraction orders are integrated. Likewise, the threshold angle θmax in Eq. (4) is said to be 'extracted' from the BRDF without stating the extraction criterion. Without these definitions, the quantitative hierarchy in Fig. 6(e) and the validation of Eq. (4) cannot be independently assessed. Please add explicit definitions and algorithms.
  3. [Section 5, final paragraph] The sentence 'Even in the thermodynamic limit [Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable.]—where the system size tends to infinity and all metaatoms are assumed to be identical—...' contains a broken cross-reference and does not define what 'thermodynamic limit' means for a finite, disordered metasurface illuminated by a finite beam. This is precisely the limiting statement that requires supercell-size convergence or an independent argument. As written, the paragraph overreaches the N=26 simulation evidence. Please either provide a rigorous definition and supporting convergence data, or soften the claim to finite systems.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 5, final paragraph] The unresolved placeholder '[Erreur ! Source du renvoi introuvable.]' must be fixed before submission.
  2. [Title and abstract] The title and abstract describe the limitations as 'extrinsic', but the central claim in Section 5 is that multiple scattering imposes an 'intrinsic' thermodynamic-limit limitation. This wording should be reconciled.
  3. [Section 2, Eq. (4)] The text writes 's n(θmax)'; this should read 'sin θmax'.
  4. [Section 3, Fig. 4(d)] The caption says 'quenching efficiencies close to the periodic case are obtained significant P values'; 'significant' should be 'for significant'.
  5. [Section 3, Fig. 4(d)] The notation 'N=20,000 and P=3' is ambiguous: with 3×3 replications the total number of points is 180,000. Clarify whether N refers to the unit cell or the full tiled area.
  6. [Section 5, Fig. 6 caption and SI] The statement that Figures S8–S11 contain 'convergence tests on the accuracy of the computed data' should explicitly state whether these tests include supercell-size convergence or only Fourier-harmonic convergence; the main text currently does not allow the reader to distinguish these.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central predictions are externally tested or computed with independent solvers.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are supported by independent computations and experiments. The quenching equation (Eq. 3) is a mathematical identity relating pattern-generator parameters (ρ, χ) to the reciprocal-space cutoff qmax; the experimental verification in Fig. 3 is an external consistency check, not a fitting exercise. Finite-size effects are quantified from the analytically tiled structure factor (Eq. 5), a standard Fourier-optics result. Polydispersity is treated by assigning measured SEM size statistics to single-particle far-field amplitudes computed with an independent near-to-far-field solver; no parameter is fitted to the final quenching efficiency. The multiple-scattering conclusion rests on full-wave RCWA (RETICOLO), which solves Maxwell's equations for the actual supercell geometry, versus an independent-scattering approximation that multiplies the structure factor by a single-particle form factor. The two calculations share only the point coordinates and material data; the 10^5 suppression is an emergent numerical result, not an identity. The paper's use of self-authored codes and reviews (refs 20, 28, 33, 36) is methodological, not a load-bearing uniqueness theorem or an ansatz. The only caveat is that the thermodynamic-limit inference from N=26 supercells is an extrapolation, and the broken cross-reference is a technical flaw; these are evidence-strength issues, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The free-parameter list is short because ρ and χ are controlled inputs; the main hidden degrees of freedom are the unspecified BRDF threshold criterion and the unvalidated N=26-to-thermodynamic-limit extrapolation.

free parameters (3)
  • Metasurface density ρ and stealthiness χ = ρ ∈ {2, 3, 4} µm⁻²; χ ∈ {0.1, ..., 0.6}
    Chosen experimental design parameters that set the predicted quenching angle via Eq. (4); they are not fitted to the outcome but are load-bearing inputs to the comparison.
  • Reference metaatom size l0 for polydispersity normalization = 112 nm
    Selected as the reference size for δ_l in Section 4; the measured mean is 111.7 nm, so l0 is effectively rounded from the measured data.
  • θmax extraction criterion from BRDF = not stated
    The experimental threshold angles in Fig. 3(c) are read from BRDF curves, but the paper does not define a quantitative extraction rule; the threshold positions depend on this implicit criterion.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Independent scattering factorization: total scattered field is a coherent sum of identical single-metaatom fields (Eq. 1 → Eq. 2), so the intensity is proportional to the structure factor times a form factor.
    Used in Section 2 and for ISA predictions; the paper's own RCWA results show this fails at densities ≥2 µm⁻².
  • domain assumption The SHU pattern generator, under periodic boundary conditions, produces a structure factor ~10⁻⁵ inside |q| < qmax; this ideal baseline determines the theoretical quenching efficiency.
    Section 2, Figure 2(b)-(c); the generator's residual non-zero S_r inside the zone is part of the 10⁵ figure.
  • ad hoc to paper RCWA on a 26-point supercell with 81×81 harmonics is representative of macroscopic metasurfaces and supports statements about the thermodynamic limit.
    Section 5 uses N=26 only for computational tractability; no supercell-size convergence study is reported, yet the conclusion claims thermodynamic-limit validity.
  • domain assumption Polydispersity analysis for TE polarization and a single scattering plane (azimuth=0) captures the dominant effect; phase variation at 30° is taken as representative of all scattering angles.
    Section 4 and Figure S6: the authors state trends are 'essentially the same' but show quantitative data only for a polar angle of 30°.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 12478 in / 15396 out tokens · 140309 ms · 2026-08-03T05:21:15.292017+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Hyperuniformity promises an unusual form of wave control: the suppression of elastic scattering over extended angular ranges without periodic order. Here, we present a comprehensive experimental and theoretical study of 2D stealthy hyperuniform metasurfaces operating at optical frequencies. In agreement with theoretical expectations, we observe a pronounced reduction of elastic scattering around the specular direction in metasurfaces fabricated by electron-beam lithography. However, the measured suppression is substantially weaker than that predicted by structure-factor calculations based on ideal stealthy hyperuniform point-pattern generators. We identify and quantitatively analyze the physical origins of this discrepancy and establish realistic performance bounds. By isolating the dominant limiting mechanisms, our results provide practical design guidelines for the implementation of stealthy hyperuniformity in functional devices.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spectral Leakage and Masking Effects in the Measurement of Hyperuniformity

    cond-mat.soft 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Finite observation windows and masks induce a universal k² leakage term in the measured structure factor of hyperuniform systems at small k, with the true exponent α visible only in an intermediate regime.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Sheng, Introduction to Wave Scattering, Localization and Mesoscopic Phenomena (Academic, 1995)

    P. Sheng, Introduction to Wave Scattering, Localization and Mesoscopic Phenomena (Academic, 1995)

    1995

  2. [2]

    Sebbah, Waves and Imaging through Complex Media (Kluwer Academic, 2001)

    P. Sebbah, Waves and Imaging through Complex Media (Kluwer Academic, 2001)

    2001

  3. [3]

    Light in correlated disordered media

    K. Vynck, R. Pierrat, R. Carminati, L. S. Froufe -Pérez, F. Scheffold , R. Sapienza, S. Vignolini, and J. J. Sáenz, "Light in correlated disordered media", Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 045003 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    The visual appearances of disordered optical metasurfaces

    K. Vynck, R. Pacanowski, A. Agreda, A. Dufay, X. Granier, and P. Lalanne, "The visual appearances of disordered optical metasurfaces", Nat. Mater. 21, 1035–1041 (2022)

    2022

  5. [5]

    Toward perfect optical diffusers: dielectric Huygens’ metasurfaces with critical positional disorder

    D. Arslan, A. Rahimzadegan, S. Fasold, et al., "Toward perfect optical diffusers: dielectric Huygens’ metasurfaces with critical positional disorder", Adv. Mater. 34, 2105868 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Tailored light scattering through hyperuniform disorder in self-organized arrays of high-index nanodisks

    P. M. Piechulla, B. Fuhrmann, E. Slivina, et al., "Tailored light scattering through hyperuniform disorder in self-organized arrays of high-index nanodisks", Adv. Opt. Mater. 9, 2100186 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Correlated Disorder Substrate‐Integrated Nanodisk Scatterers for Light Extraction in Organic Light Emitting Diodes

    P. M. Piechulla, Y.J. Donie, R.B. Wehrspohn, U. Lemmer, G. Gomard, A.N. Sprafke, "Correlated Disorder Substrate‐Integrated Nanodisk Scatterers for Light Extraction in Organic Light Emitting Diodes", Adv. Opt. Mater. 11, 2202557 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    Transparent near -infrared reflector metasurface with randomly dispersed silver nanodisks

    T. Tani, S. Hakuta, N. Kiyoto, and M. Naya, "Transparent near -infrared reflector metasurface with randomly dispersed silver nanodisks", Opt. Express 22, 9262 –9270 (2014)

    2014

  9. [9]

    Engineering of diffuse structural colors

    Y. Billiet, V. Chevalier, S. Kostcheev, H. Kadiri, S. Blaize, A. Rumyantseva, and G. Lérondel, "Engineering of diffuse structural colors", Adv. Opt. Mater. 12, 2302165 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    Local density fluctuations, hyperuniformity, and order metrics,

    S. Torquato and F. H. Stillinger, “Local density fluctuations, hyperuniformity, and order metrics,” Phys. Rev. E 68, 041113 (2003)

    2003

  11. [11]

    Classical disordered ground states: Super-ideal gases and stealth and equi-luminous materials,

    R. D. Batten, F. H. Stillinger, S. Torquato, "Classical disordered ground states: Super-ideal gases and stealth and equi-luminous materials," J. Appl. Phys. 104, 033504 (2008)

    2008

  12. [12]

    Reciprocal space engineering with hyperuniform gold disordered surfaces

    M. Castro -Lopez, M. Gaio, S. Sellers, G. Gkantzounis, M. Florescu, and R. Sapienza, "Reciprocal space engineering with hyperuniform gold disordered surfaces", APL Photonics 2, 066103 (2017)

    2017

  13. [13]

    Engineered hyperuniformity for directional light extraction

    S. Gorsky, W. A. Britton, Y. Chen, J. Montaner, A. Lenef, M. Raukas, and L. Dal Negro, "Engineered hyperuniformity for directional light extraction", APL Photonics 4, 111101 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Avian photoreceptor patterns represent a disordered hyperuniform solution to a multiscale packing problem

    Y. Jiao, T. Lau, H. Hatzikirou, M. Meyer-Hermann, J. C. Corbo, and S. Torquato, "Avian photoreceptor patterns represent a disordered hyperuniform solution to a multiscale packing problem", Phys. Rev. E 89, 022721 (2014)

    2014

  15. [15]

    Disordered heterogeneous universe: Galaxy distribution and clustering across length scales

    O. H. Philcox and S. Torquato, "Disordered heterogeneous universe: Galaxy distribution and clustering across length scales", Phys. Rev. X 13, 011038 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Hyperuniformity in the Formation of Band Gaps in Disordered Photonic Materials

    L. S. Froufe-Pérez, M. Engel, P. F. Damasceno, N. Muller, J. Haberko, S. C. Glotzer, and F. Scheffold, "Hyperuniformity in the Formation of Band Gaps in Disordered Photonic Materials", Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 053902 (2016)

    2016

  17. [17]

    Bandgap fluctuations and robustness in two -dimensional hyperuniform dielectric materials

    L. S. Froufe-Pérez, G. J. Aubry, F. Scheffold, and S. Magkiriadou, "Bandgap fluctuations and robustness in two -dimensional hyperuniform dielectric materials", Opt. Express 31, 18509–18515 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Hypersonic acoustic wave control via stealthy hyperuniform phononic nanostructures

    M. Diego, J. Hardouin, G. Mazevet -Schargrod, M. Pirro, B. Kim, R. Anufriev, and M. Nomura, "Hypersonic acoustic wave control via stealthy hyperuniform phononic nanostructures", Sci. Adv. 11, eadw7205 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    Experimental tuning of transport regimes in hyperuniform disordered photonic materials,

    G. J. Aubry, L. S. Froufe -Pérez, U. Kuhl, O. Legrand, F. Scheffold, and F. Mortessagne, “Experimental tuning of transport regimes in hyperuniform disordered photonic materials,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 127402 (2020)

    2020

  20. [20]

    Disordered optical metasurfaces: basics, design and applications

    P. Lalanne, M. Chen, C. Rockstuhl, A. Sprafke, A. Dmitriev, K. Vynck, "Disordered optical metasurfaces: basics, design and applications", Adv. Opt. Photon. 17, 45 -112 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Hyperuniform disordered distribution metasurface for scattering reduction,

    H. Zhang, et al., "Hyperuniform disordered distribution metasurface for scattering reduction," Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 101101 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    Generating large disordered stealthy hyperuniform systems with ultra -high accuracy to determine their physical properties

    P. K. Morse, J. Kim, P. J. Steinhardt, and S. Torquato, "Generating large disordered stealthy hyperuniform systems with ultra -high accuracy to determine their physical properties", Phys. Rev. Research 5, 033190 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Morphogenetic Design of Self -Organized Correlated Disordered Electromagnetic Media

    F. Chehami, C. Decroze, T. Pasquet, E. Perrin, and T. Fromenteze, "Morphogenetic Design of Self -Organized Correlated Disordered Electromagnetic Media", ACS Photonics 10, 1890-1898 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    Fast Generation of Spectrally-Shaped Disorder

    A. Shih, M. Casiulis, S. Martiniani, "Fast Generation of Spectrally-Shaped Disorder", Phys. Rev. E 110, 034122 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Engineered disorder in photonics

    S. Yu, C.-W. Qiu, Y. Chong, S. Torquato, and N. Park, "Engineered disorder in photonics", Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 226–243 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    High -density hyperuniform materials can be transparent,

    O. Leseur, R. Pierrat , and R. Carminati, "High -density hyperuniform materials can be transparent," Optica 3, 763–767 (2016)

    2016

  27. [27]

    Ensemble theory for stealthy hyperuniform disordered ground states

    S. Torquato, G. Zhang, and F. H. Stillinger, "Ensemble theory for stealthy hyperuniform disordered ground states", Phys. Rev. X 5, 021020 (2015)

    2015

  28. [28]

    Emergent scattering regimes in disordered metasurfaces near critical packing

    M. Chen, A. Agreda, T. Wu, F. Carcenac, K. Vynck, P. Lalanne, "Emergent scattering regimes in disordered metasurfaces near critical packing", Nat. Commun. 16, 11125 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Tailoring iridescent visual appearance with disordered resonant metasurfaces,

    A. Agreda, T. Wu, A. Hereu, M. Treguer-Delapierre, G. L. Drisko, K. Vynck, P. Lalanne, "Tailoring iridescent visual appearance with disordered resonant metasurfaces," ACS Nano 17, 6362–6372 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    Over 65% Sunlight Absorption in a 1 µm Si Slab with Hyperuniform Texture

    N. Tavakoli, R. Spalding, P. Koppejan, G. Gkantzounis, C. Wang, R. Röhrich, E. Kontoleta, A.F. Koenderink, R. Sapienza, M. Florescu, E. Alarcon -Llado, "Over 65% Sunlight Absorption in a 1 µm Si Slab with Hyperuniform Texture", ACS Photonics 9, 1206-17 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    Spatial coherence of sunlight and its implications for light management in photovoltaics

    S. Divitt and L. Novotny, "Spatial coherence of sunlight and its implications for light management in photovoltaics", Optica 2, 95–103 (2015)

    2015

  32. [32]

    J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (Ben Roberts, 2005), 3rd ed

    2005

  33. [33]

    Near -to-far field transformations for radiative and guided waves,

    J. Yang, J. P. Hugonin, P. Lalanne, "Near -to-far field transformations for radiative and guided waves," ACS Photonics 3, 395–402 (2016)

    2016

  34. [34]

    Stealth acoustic materials,

    V. Romero-García, N. Lamothe, G. Theocharis, O. Richoux, L. M. Garcia -Raffi, "Stealth acoustic materials," Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 054076 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    Impact of particle size and multiple scattering on the propagation of waves in stealthy -hyperuniform media,

    A. Rohfritsch, J. M. Conoir, T. Valier-Brasier, R. Marchiano, "Impact of particle size and multiple scattering on the propagation of waves in stealthy -hyperuniform media," Phys. Rev. E 102, 053001 (2020)

    2020

  36. [36]

    RETICOLO software for grating analysis

    J. P. Hugonin, P. Lalanne, "RETICOLO software for grating analysis", arXiv:2101.00901 (2021)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    New formulation of the Fourier modal method for crossed surface-relief gratings

    L. Li, "New formulation of the Fourier modal method for crossed surface-relief gratings", J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 14, 2758–2767 (1997)

    1997

  38. [38]

    Fundamental limitations of Huygens’ metasurfaces for optical beam shaping,

    C. Gigli, Q. Li, P. Chavel, G. Leo, M. L. Brongersma, P. Lalanne, "Fundamental limitations of Huygens’ metasurfaces for optical beam shaping," Laser Photon. Rev. 15, 2000448 (2021)

    2021