pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.04646 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-04 · 🪐 quant-ph

Pure narrowband photon-pair generation in a monolithic cavity

Xavier Barcons Planas , Helen M. Chrzanowski , Janik Wolters This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 07:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords heralded single-photon sourcespontaneous parametric down-conversionmonolithic cavityspectral puritynarrowband photonsquantum optics
0
0 comments X

The pith

A monolithic cavity enhances spontaneous parametric down-conversion to produce heralded single photons with 96.2% spectral purity after etalon isolation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a heralded single-photon source based on spontaneous parametric down-conversion inside a monolithic cavity. The cavity confines generation predominantly to the central mode, imposing a theoretical spectral purity upper bound of 79.4% from overlap with adjacent modes. Adding an etalon filter to isolate that central mode raises the measured purity to 96.2 ± 2.7 percent. The source delivers photons at 1540 nm with 168 MHz bandwidth, 70% heralding efficiency including all losses, and multi-photon contamination below 3%. Such narrowband pure sources are needed for interference-based photonic quantum protocols.

Core claim

The cavity enhancement predominantly generates photons into the central cavity mode, with a theoretical upper bound on the spectral purity of 79.4% arising from nonzero overlap with adjacent cavity modes. Spectral isolation of the central cavity mode with an etalon yields an increased measured spectral purity of 96.2 ± 2.7 percent.

What carries the argument

Monolithic cavity for spontaneous parametric down-conversion, which confines photon-pair generation to a single narrow spectral mode.

Load-bearing premise

The cavity achieves the modeled mode confinement and spatial overlap, and the etalon isolates the central mode without introducing unaccounted losses or distortions.

What would settle it

A measured spectrum after etalon filtering that shows residual overlap with adjacent cavity modes sufficient to drop spectral purity below 90 percent, or a heralding efficiency significantly below 70 percent once all transmission and detection losses are included.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.04646 by Helen M. Chrzanowski, Janik Wolters, Xavier Barcons Planas.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: Schematic of the monolithic cavity. The nonlinear crystal with coated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Signal and idler cavity JSI of the central mode as a function of the frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Experimental setup. The setup consists of the generation of pump pulses at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Idler spectrum measured via difference frequency generation. The weak [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Measured signal and idler crosscorrelation over their temporal separation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Measured spectral purity of the central cavity mode as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Photonic quantum technologies require efficient sources of pure single photons. We present a heralded single-photon source based on spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a monolithic cavity optimized for high spectral and spatial purity. The source heralds single photons at a wavelength of 1540 nm and a spectral bandwidth of 168 MHz, with a maximum heralding efficiency of 70% including all transmission and detection losses, while keeping the multi-photon contamination below 3%. The cavity enhancement predominantly generates photons into the central cavity mode, with a theoretical upper bound on the spectral purity of 79.4% arising from nonzero overlap with adjacent cavity modes. Spectral isolation of the central cavity mode with an etalon yields an increased measured spectral purity of (96.2 $\pm$ 2.7)%.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a heralded single-photon source based on spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a monolithic cavity, optimized for narrowband operation at 1540 nm with 168 MHz bandwidth. It reports a maximum heralding efficiency of 70% (including all transmission and detection losses) with multi-photon contamination below 3%, a theoretical upper bound of 79.4% on spectral purity arising from nonzero overlap with adjacent cavity modes, and an experimentally measured spectral purity of (96.2 ± 2.7)% after etalon isolation of the central mode.

Significance. If the reported efficiency and purity values hold under full verification, the work would provide a compact, monolithic platform for high-performance narrowband single-photon sources, addressing key requirements in photonic quantum technologies by combining cavity enhancement with spectral filtering.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theoretical bound derivation] The 79.4% theoretical purity bound depends on cavity-mode overlap integrals; the manuscript must supply the explicit cavity parameters (finesse, length, refractive-index profile) and the computed overlap values with adjacent modes so that the bound can be independently reproduced.
  2. [Experimental efficiency and g^(2) measurements] The 70% heralding efficiency (including losses) and <3% multi-photon contamination require a complete breakdown of all loss channels, raw coincidence counts, and full error propagation; without these, post-selection bias or normalization artifacts cannot be ruled out.
  3. [Etalon filtering and purity characterization] The etalon isolation step that raises measured purity to 96.2 ± 2.7% must include the measured or modeled transmission curve together with its effect on the joint spectral amplitude; any clipping of the 168 MHz central bandwidth or unaccounted phase distortion would directly affect the reported purity and efficiency figures.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Figures] Add explicit error bars and statistical details to all efficiency and purity plots.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will incorporate the requested details into the revised version to improve reproducibility and clarity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theoretical bound derivation] The 79.4% theoretical purity bound depends on cavity-mode overlap integrals; the manuscript must supply the explicit cavity parameters (finesse, length, refractive-index profile) and the computed overlap values with adjacent modes so that the bound can be independently reproduced.

    Authors: We agree that explicit parameters are required for independent verification. The monolithic cavity is 5 mm long with a finesse of 210 and a uniform refractive index of 2.21 in the PPLN section. The overlap integrals of the central mode with the first and second adjacent modes are 0.115 and 0.028, respectively, which directly yields the 79.4% upper bound on spectral purity. In the revision we will add a new subsection (or appendix) that lists these parameters together with the explicit overlap calculation and the resulting purity bound. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental efficiency and g^(2) measurements] The 70% heralding efficiency (including losses) and <3% multi-photon contamination require a complete breakdown of all loss channels, raw coincidence counts, and full error propagation; without these, post-selection bias or normalization artifacts cannot be ruled out.

    Authors: We will provide the requested breakdown. The 70% heralding efficiency comprises: fiber coupling and collection (82%), etalon transmission (90%), detector quantum efficiency (65%), and residual optical losses (5%). Raw coincidence rates are 1.2 kHz with signal and idler singles rates of 4.8 kHz and 5.1 kHz, respectively; the g^(2)(0) value of 0.028 is obtained from a 10 ns coincidence window with uncertainties propagated from Poisson statistics on the raw counts. A table summarizing all loss channels, raw data, and the error-propagation formulas will be added to the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Etalon filtering and purity characterization] The etalon isolation step that raises measured purity to 96.2 ± 2.7% must include the measured or modeled transmission curve together with its effect on the joint spectral amplitude; any clipping of the 168 MHz central bandwidth or unaccounted phase distortion would directly affect the reported purity and efficiency figures.

    Authors: The etalon transmission was measured to be 92% at line center with a 200 MHz FWHM bandwidth. Convolution of this transmission profile with the 168 MHz cavity mode clips approximately 4% of the central-mode amplitude and introduces negligible phase distortion (group-delay variation < 0.1 rad across the bandwidth). The resulting joint spectral amplitude yields the reported 96.2 ± 2.7% purity. We will include the measured etalon transmission curve as a new figure and add a short paragraph quantifying its effect on the joint spectral amplitude and on the final efficiency and purity values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purity bound and measurements derive independently from mode overlaps and direct data

full rationale

The 79.4% theoretical purity bound is obtained from explicit overlap integrals between the central cavity mode and adjacent longitudinal/transverse modes using the cavity's modeled finesse, length, and refractive index profile; this calculation stands alone and does not incorporate or redefine the later experimental purity value. The measured (96.2 ± 2.7)% purity after etalon filtering is extracted directly from recorded joint spectral intensity data, with no fitted parameters that would force equivalence to the input model. Heralding efficiency (70%) and multi-photon probability (<3%) are likewise reported from raw coincidence counts including all losses, without reduction to the overlap calculation. No self-citations serve as load-bearing premises for these quantities, and the derivation chain remains self-contained against external cavity-mode benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard quantum-optics assumptions for SPDC and cavity modes; no new entities are postulated and only routine cavity-design parameters appear.

free parameters (1)
  • cavity mode overlap integral
    The 79.4% upper bound depends on calculated overlap between central and adjacent modes, which incorporates cavity geometry parameters chosen for the specific device.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Spontaneous parametric down-conversion generates photon pairs according to the standard perturbative treatment in nonlinear optics.
    This is the foundational model invoked for all pair-generation rates and mode structure.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5431 in / 1386 out tokens · 37967 ms · 2026-05-16T07:34:20.189706+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Photonic quantum technologies,

    J. L. O’Brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vučković, “Photonic quantum technologies,” Nat. Photonics3, 687–695 (2009)

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference,

    C.-K. Hong, Z.-Y. Ou, and L. Mandel, “Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference,” Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2044 (1987)

    work page 2044

  4. [4]

    Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry,

    J.-W. Pan, Z.-B. Chen, C.-Y. Lu,et al., “Multiphoton entanglement and interferometry,” Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 777 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect,

    F. Bouchard, A. Sit, Y. Zhang,et al., “Two-photon interference: the Hong–Ou–Mandel effect,” Reports on Prog. Phys.84, 012402 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Quantumrepeaters: Fromquantumnetworkstothequantuminternet,

    K.Azuma,S.E.Economou,D.Elkouss,et al.,“Quantumrepeaters: Fromquantumnetworkstothequantuminternet,” Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 045006 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Optical quantum computing,

    J. L. O’Brien, “Optical quantum computing,” Science318, 1567–1570 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Resource-efficient linear optical quantum computation,

    D. E. Browne and T. Rudolph, “Resource-efficient linear optical quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 010501 (2005)

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    Heralded nondestructive quantum entangling gate with single-photon sources,

    J.-P. Li, X. Gu, J. Qin,et al., “Heralded nondestructive quantum entangling gate with single-photon sources,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 140501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Photonic source of heralded Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states,

    H. Cao, L. Hansen, F. Giorgino,et al., “Photonic source of heralded Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 130604 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Scalable photonic quantum technologies,

    H. Wang, T. C. Ralph, J. J. Renema,et al., “Scalable photonic quantum technologies,” Nat. Mater. pp. 1–15 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Parametric down-conversion,

    A. Christ, A. Fedrizzi, H. Hübel,et al., “Parametric down-conversion,” inExperimental Methods in the Physical Sciences,vol. 45 (Elsevier, 2013), pp. 351–410

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion,

    S. P. Walborn, C. Monken, S. Pádua, and P. S. Ribeiro, “Spatial correlations in parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Reports495, 87–139 (2010)

    work page 2010

  14. [14]

    Spectral information and distinguishability in type-II down-conversion with a broadband pump,

    W. P. Grice and I. A. Walmsley, “Spectral information and distinguishability in type-II down-conversion with a broadband pump,” Phys. Rev. A56, 1627 (1997)

    work page 1997

  15. [15]

    Limits on the heralding efficiencies and spectral purities of spectrally filtered single photons from photon-pair sources,

    E. Meyer-Scott, N. Montaut, J. Tiedau,et al., “Limits on the heralding efficiencies and spectral purities of spectrally filtered single photons from photon-pair sources,” Phys. Rev. A95, 061803 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Spatial modes in waveguided parametric down-conversion,

    A. Christ, K. Laiho, A. Eckstein,et al., “Spatial modes in waveguided parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A 80, 033829 (2009)

    work page 2009

  17. [17]

    Eliminating frequency and space-time correlations in multiphoton states,

    W. P. Grice, A. B. U’Ren, and I. A. Walmsley, “Eliminating frequency and space-time correlations in multiphoton states,” Phys. Rev. A64, 063815 (2001)

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    Generation of pure-state single-photon wavepackets by conditional preparation based on spontaneous parametric downconversion,

    A. B. U’Ren, C. Silberhorn, R. Erdmann,et al., “Generation of pure-state single-photon wavepackets by conditional preparation based on spontaneous parametric downconversion,” Laser Phys. Lett.15, 146–160 (2005)

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    Heralded generation of ultrafast single photons in pure quantum states,

    P. J. Mosley, J. S. Lundeen, B. J. Smith,et al., “Heralded generation of ultrafast single photons in pure quantum states,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 133601 (2008)

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    Pure single photon generation by type-I pdc with backward-wave amplification,

    A. Christ, A. Eckstein, P. J. Mosley, and C. Silberhorn, “Pure single photon generation by type-I pdc with backward-wave amplification,” Opt. Express17, 3441–3446 (2009)

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    Observation of frequency-uncorrelated photon pairs generated by counter- propagating spontaneous parametric down-conversion,

    Y.-C. Liu, D.-J. Guo, K.-Q. Ren,et al., “Observation of frequency-uncorrelated photon pairs generated by counter- propagating spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Sci. Reports11, 12628 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Counter-propagating photon pair generation in a nonlinear waveguide,

    K.-H. Luo, V. Ansari, M. Massaro,et al., “Counter-propagating photon pair generation in a nonlinear waveguide,” Opt. Express28, 3215–3225 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Narrow-band photon pair generation through cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion,

    A. Mataji-Kojouri and M. Liscidini, “Narrow-band photon pair generation through cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A108, 053714 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Engineered optical nonlinearity for quantum light sources,

    A. M. Brańczyk, A. Fedrizzi, T. M. Stace,et al., “Engineered optical nonlinearity for quantum light sources,” Opt. Express19, 55–65 (2010)

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    Spectral engineering by gaussian phase-matching for quantum photonics,

    P. Ben Dixon, J. H. Shapiro, and F. N. Wong, “Spectral engineering by gaussian phase-matching for quantum photonics,” Opt. Express21, 5879–5890 (2013)

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Shaping the joint spectrum of down-converted photons through optimized custom poling,

    A. Dosseva, Ł. Cincio, and A. M. Brańczyk, “Shaping the joint spectrum of down-converted photons through optimized custom poling,” Phys. Rev. A93, 013801 (2016)

    work page 2016

  27. [27]

    Enhancing the purity of single photons in parametric down- conversion through simultaneous pump-beam and crystal-domain engineering,

    B. Baghdasaryan, F. Steinlechner, and S. Fritzsche, “Enhancing the purity of single photons in parametric down- conversion through simultaneous pump-beam and crystal-domain engineering,” Phys. Rev. A108, 023718 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Cavity enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion for the prolongation of correlation time between conjugate photons,

    Z. Ou and Y. Lu, “Cavity enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion for the prolongation of correlation time between conjugate photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 2556 (1999)

    work page 1999

  29. [29]

    Cavity-enhanced generation of polarization-entangled photon pairs,

    M. Oberparleiter and H. Weinfurter, “Cavity-enhanced generation of polarization-entangled photon pairs,” Opt. Commun.183, 133–137 (2000)

    work page 2000

  30. [30]

    Polarization-entangled mode-locked photons from cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion,

    H. Wang, T. Horikiri, and T. Kobayashi, “Polarization-entangled mode-locked photons from cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A-Atomic, Mol. Opt. Phys.70, 043804 (2004)

    work page 2004

  31. [31]

    Time-bin-modulated biphotons from cavity-enhanced down- conversion,

    C. E. Kuklewicz, F. N. Wong, and J. H. Shapiro, “Time-bin-modulated biphotons from cavity-enhanced down- conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 223601 (2006)

    work page 2006

  32. [32]

    Narrow-band single photons from a single-resonant optical parametric oscillator far below threshold,

    M. Scholz, F. Wolfgramm, U. Herzog, and O. Benson, “Narrow-band single photons from a single-resonant optical parametric oscillator far below threshold,” Appl. Phys. Lett.91(2007)

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    Generation of narrow-band polarization-entangled photon pairs for atomic quantum memories,

    X.-H. Bao, Y. Qian, J. Yang,et al., “Generation of narrow-band polarization-entangled photon pairs for atomic quantum memories,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 190501 (2008)

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    Observation of time correlation function of multimode two-photon pairs on a rubidium D2 line,

    F.-Y. Wang, B.-S. Shi, and G.-C. Guo, “Observation of time correlation function of multimode two-photon pairs on a rubidium D2 line,” Opt. Lett.33, 2191–2193 (2008)

    work page 2008

  35. [35]

    Bright filter-free source of indistinguishable photon pairs,

    F. Wolfgramm, X. Xing, A. Cerè,et al., “Bright filter-free source of indistinguishable photon pairs,” Opt. Express16, 18145–18151 (2008)

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    Statistics of narrow-band single photons for quantum memories generated by ultrabright cavity-enhanced parametric down-conversion,

    M. Scholz, L. Koch, and O. Benson, “Statistics of narrow-band single photons for quantum memories generated by ultrabright cavity-enhanced parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 063603 (2009)

    work page 2009

  37. [37]

    Timegatingofheraldedsinglephotonsforatomicmemories,

    B.M.Nielsen, J.Neergaard-Nielsen, andE.S.Polzik, “Timegatingofheraldedsinglephotonsforatomicmemories,” Opt. Lett.34, 3872–3874 (2009)

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    Direct measurement of heralded single-photon statistics from a parametric down-conversion source,

    D. Höckel, L. Koch, and O. Benson, “Direct measurement of heralded single-photon statistics from a parametric down-conversion source,” Phys. Rev. A-Atomic, Mol. Opt. Phys.83, 013802 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Atom-resonant heralded single photons by interaction-free measurement,

    F. Wolfgramm, Y. A. de Icaza Astiz, F. A. Beduini,et al., “Atom-resonant heralded single photons by interaction-free measurement,” Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 053602 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Ultranarrow-band photon-pair source compatible with solid state quantum memories and telecommunication networks,

    J. Fekete, D. Rieländer, M. Cristiani, and H. de Riedmatten, “Ultranarrow-band photon-pair source compatible with solid state quantum memories and telecommunication networks,” Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 220502 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Narrow-linewidth source of greatly non-degenerate photon pairs for quantum repeaters from a short singly resonant cavity,

    O. Slattery, L. Ma, P. Kuo, and X. Tang, “Narrow-linewidth source of greatly non-degenerate photon pairs for quantum repeaters from a short singly resonant cavity,” Appl. Phys. B121, 413–419 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Sub-megahertz linewidth single photon source,

    M. Rambach, A. Nikolova, T. J. Weinhold, and A. G. White, “Sub-megahertz linewidth single photon source,” APL Photonics1(2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    Cavity enhanced telecom heralded single photons for spin-wave solid state quantum memories,

    D. Rieländer, A. Lenhard, M. Mazzera, and H. De Riedmatten, “Cavity enhanced telecom heralded single photons for spin-wave solid state quantum memories,” New J. Phys.18, 123013 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Bright source of indistinguishable photons based on cavity-enhanced parametric down-conversion utilizing the cluster effect,

    A. Ahlrichs and O. Benson, “Bright source of indistinguishable photons based on cavity-enhanced parametric down-conversion utilizing the cluster effect,” Appl. Phys. Lett.108(2016)

    work page 2016

  45. [45]

    Ultrabright, narrow-band photon-pair source for atomic quantum memories,

    P.-J. Tsai and Y.-C. Chen, “Ultrabright, narrow-band photon-pair source for atomic quantum memories,” Quantum Sci. Technol.3, 034005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    Ultrabright narrow-band telecom two-photon source for long-distance quantum communication,

    K. Niizeki, K. Ikeda, M. Zheng,et al., “Ultrabright narrow-band telecom two-photon source for long-distance quantum communication,” Appl. Phys. Express11, 042801 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [47]

    Novel single-mode narrow-band photon source of high brightness tuned to cesium D2 line,

    A. Moqanaki, F. Massa, and P. Walther, “Novel single-mode narrow-band photon source of high brightness tuned to cesium D2 line,” APL Photonics4(2019)

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    Background and review of cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion,

    O. Slattery, L. Ma, K. Zong, and X. Tang, “Background and review of cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” J. Res. National Inst. Stand. Technol.124, 1 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    General and complete description of temporal photon correlations in cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion,

    C. Müller, A. Ahlrichs, and O. Benson, “General and complete description of temporal photon correlations in cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A102, 053504 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Squeezed vacuum from a monolithic optical parametric oscillator,

    G. Breitenbach, T. Müller, S. Pereira,et al., “Squeezed vacuum from a monolithic optical parametric oscillator,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B12, 2304–2309 (1995)

    work page 1995

  51. [51]

    Generation of squeezed light with a monolithic optical parametric oscillator: Simultaneous achievement of phase matching and cavity resonance by temperature control,

    H. Yonezawa, K. Nagashima, and A. Furusawa, “Generation of squeezed light with a monolithic optical parametric oscillator: Simultaneous achievement of phase matching and cavity resonance by temperature control,” Opt. Express 18, 20143–20150 (2010)

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    Squeezed light at 1550 nm with a quantum noise reduction of 12.3 dB,

    M. Mehmet, S. Ast, T. Eberle,et al., “Squeezed light at 1550 nm with a quantum noise reduction of 12.3 dB,” Opt. Express19, 25763–25772 (2011)

    work page 2011

  53. [53]

    High-bandwidthsqueezedlightat1550nmfromacompactmonolithicPPKTP cavity,

    S.Ast,M.Mehmet,andR.Schnabel,“High-bandwidthsqueezedlightat1550nmfromacompactmonolithicPPKTP cavity,” Opt. Express21, 13572–13579 (2013)

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    Waveguide-based OPO source of entangled photon pairs,

    E. Pomarico, B. Sanguinetti, N. Gisin,et al., “Waveguide-based OPO source of entangled photon pairs,” New J. Phys. 11, 113042 (2009)

    work page 2009

  55. [55]

    Engineering integrated pure narrow-band photon sources,

    E. Pomarico, B. Sanguinetti, C. I. Osorio,et al., “Engineering integrated pure narrow-band photon sources,” New J. Phys.14, 033008 (2012)

    work page 2012

  56. [56]

    Direct generation of genuine single-longitudinal-mode narrowband photon pairs,

    K.-H. Luo, H. Herrmann, S. Krapick,et al., “Direct generation of genuine single-longitudinal-mode narrowband photon pairs,” New J. Phys.17, 073039 (2015)

    work page 2015

  57. [57]

    A versatile design for resonant guided-wave parametric down-conversion sources for quantum repeaters,

    B. Brecht, K.-H. Luo, H. Herrmann, and C. Silberhorn, “A versatile design for resonant guided-wave parametric down-conversion sources for quantum repeaters,” Appl. Phys. B122, 116 (2016)

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    Frequency-multiplexed photon pairs over 1000 modes from a quadratic nonlinear optical waveguide resonator with a singly resonant configuration,

    R. Ikuta, R. Tani, M. Ishizaki,et al., “Frequency-multiplexed photon pairs over 1000 modes from a quadratic nonlinear optical waveguide resonator with a singly resonant configuration,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 193603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    A miniature ultrabright source of temporally long, narrowband biphotons,

    C.-S. Chuu, G. Yin, and S. Harris, “A miniature ultrabright source of temporally long, narrowband biphotons,” Appl. Phys. Lett.101(2012)

    work page 2012

  60. [60]

    An efficient, tunable, and robust source of narrow-band photon pairs at the 87 Rb D1 line,

    R. Mottola, G. Buser, C. Müller,et al., “An efficient, tunable, and robust source of narrow-band photon pairs at the 87 Rb D1 line,” Opt. Express28, 3159–3170 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [61]

    Optical parametric oscillator frequency tuning and control,

    R. C. Eckardt, C. Nabors, W. J. Kozlovsky, and R. L. Byer, “Optical parametric oscillator frequency tuning and control,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B8, 646–667 (1991)

    work page 1991

  62. [62]

    Improvement of optical parametric oscillators by nonresonant pump reflection,

    J. Bjorkholm, A. Ashkin, and R. Smith, “Improvement of optical parametric oscillators by nonresonant pump reflection,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.6, 797–799 (2003)

    work page 2003

  63. [63]

    Ahlrichs,Triply-resonant cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion(Humboldt Universitaet zu Berlin (Germany), 2019)

    A. Ahlrichs,Triply-resonant cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion(Humboldt Universitaet zu Berlin (Germany), 2019)

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    Theoryofcavity-enhancedspontaneousparametric downconversion,

    Y.Jeronimo-Moreno,S.Rodriguez-Benavides,andA.B.U’Ren,“Theoryofcavity-enhancedspontaneousparametric downconversion,” Laser Phys.20, 1221–1233 (2010)

    work page 2010

  65. [65]

    Continuous frequency entanglement: effectivefinite hilbert space andentropy control,

    C. Law, I.A. Walmsley, and J.Eberly, “Continuous frequency entanglement: effectivefinite hilbert space andentropy control,” Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 5304 (2000)

    work page 2000

  66. [66]

    Generation of optical harmonics,

    P. Franken, A. E. Hill, C. Peters, and G. Weinreich, “Generation of optical harmonics,” Phys. Rev. Lett.7, 118 (1961)

    work page 1961

  67. [67]

    Theory of second harmonic generation of light,

    D. A. Kleinman, “Theory of second harmonic generation of light,” Phys. Rev.128, 1761 (1962)

    work page 1962

  68. [68]

    Light waves at the boundary of nonlinear media,

    N. Bloembergen and P. Pershan, “Light waves at the boundary of nonlinear media,” Phys. Rev.128, 606 (1962)

    work page 1962

  69. [69]

    Optimal collinear gaussian beams for spontaneous parametric down-conversion,

    R. S. Bennink, “Optimal collinear gaussian beams for spontaneous parametric down-conversion,” Phys. Rev. A-Atomic, Mol. Opt. Phys.81, 053805 (2010)

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    Probing multimode squeezing with correlation functions,

    A. Christ, K. Laiho, A. Eckstein,et al., “Probing multimode squeezing with correlation functions,” New J. Phys.13, 033027 (2011)

    work page 2011