pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.08348 · v3 · submitted 2026-02-09 · 🧮 math.OA · math-ph· math.MP· math.QA

The braided Doplicher-Roberts program and the Finkelberg-Kazhdan-Lusztig equivalence: A historical perspective, recent progress, and future directions

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 06:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OA math-phmath.MPmath.QA
keywords braided fusion categoriesDoplicher-Roberts programFinkelberg-Kazhdan-Lusztig equivalenceweak Hopf algebrasfiber functorconformal field theoryrigidityunitarizability
0
0 comments X

The pith

A fiber functor construction for categories in the Finkelberg-Kazhdan-Lusztig equivalence explains the algebraic and analytic structure of the associated weak Hopf algebra.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper offers a historical overview of the braided Doplicher-Roberts program and its link to the Finkelberg-Kazhdan-Lusztig equivalence theorem. It describes a recent proof method that builds a fiber functor on the categories involved, thereby accounting for the structure of the corresponding weak Hopf algebra. This framework then supports results on the rigidity and unitarizability of braided fusion categories that arise in conformal field theory. The presentation stays non-technical while sketching possible next steps in the area.

Core claim

By constructing a fiber functor associated with the categories appearing in the Finkelberg-Kazhdan-Lusztig equivalence theorem, the algebraic and analytic structure of the corresponding weak Hopf algebra becomes visible in a new way. The construction supplies the core arguments of the proof, clarifies the structural properties, and yields applications to rigidity and unitarizability questions for braided fusion categories coming from conformal field theory.

What carries the argument

The fiber functor attached to the categories in the Finkelberg-Kazhdan-Lusztig equivalence theorem, which produces the algebraic and analytic properties of the weak Hopf algebra.

If this is right

  • The fiber functor supplies a direct route to rigidity statements for the braided fusion categories.
  • Unitarizability of the categories follows from the same construction without separate arguments.
  • The method gives a uniform algebraic and analytic description of the weak Hopf algebras involved.
  • The approach suggests concrete ways to extend the equivalence theorem to related settings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar fiber functor constructions could simplify proofs in other equivalences between tensor categories.
  • The analytic side of the weak Hopf algebra may connect to existing operator-algebra techniques for subfactors.
  • Applying the method to explicit examples from known conformal field theories would test its range.

Load-bearing premise

Braided fusion categories arising from conformal field theory admit a fiber functor that directly produces the stated algebraic and analytic properties of the weak Hopf algebra without extra hidden choices.

What would settle it

A concrete braided fusion category from conformal field theory for which no fiber functor can be built that reproduces the expected weak Hopf algebra structure and its rigidity or unitarizability properties.

read the original abstract

Our recent approach to the Finkelberg-Kazhdan-Lusztig equivalence theorem centers on the construction of a fiber functor associated with the categories in the equivalence theorem, which in turn explains the underlying algebraic and analytic structure of the corresponding weak Hopf algebra in a new sense. We provide a non-technical and historical overview of the core arguments behind our proof, discuss these structural properties, and its applications to rigidity and unitarizability of braided fusion categories arising from conformal field theory. We conclude proposing some natural directions for future research.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript provides a non-technical historical overview of the braided Doplicher-Roberts program in relation to the Finkelberg-Kazhdan-Lusztig equivalence theorem. It centers on the authors' recent construction of a fiber functor for the braided fusion categories arising from conformal field theory, which is asserted to explain the algebraic and analytic structure of the associated weak Hopf algebra. The text discusses applications to rigidity and unitarizability of these categories and concludes with proposed future research directions.

Significance. If the underlying technical results hold, the overview could usefully contextualize the fiber functor approach within the broader Doplicher-Roberts program and make connections to conformal field theory more accessible. It explicitly credits the historical lineage and points to open questions on unitarizability, which are genuine strengths of an expository piece. However, because all detailed constructions and verifications are deferred to the authors' prior work, the manuscript's primary contribution remains expository rather than a self-contained advance.

major comments (1)
  1. [abstract and recent progress section] The central claim (abstract and § on recent progress) that the fiber functor construction explains the weak Hopf algebra structure 'in a new sense' without additional hidden choices is not independently verifiable in this manuscript, as no explicit definition, uniqueness argument, or check against alternative choices is supplied; readers must consult the referenced prior paper for any load-bearing details.
minor comments (2)
  1. [historical perspective] The historical narrative would benefit from explicit citations to the original Doplicher-Roberts papers and to the Finkelberg-Kazhdan-Lusztig theorem statement to help readers trace the lineage without ambiguity.
  2. [throughout] Notation for the weak Hopf algebra and the fiber functor is introduced at a high level; a short glossary or consistent symbol table would improve readability for non-specialists.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on the manuscript. We appreciate the recognition of its expository strengths in contextualizing the fiber functor within the broader historical program. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [abstract and recent progress section] The central claim (abstract and § on recent progress) that the fiber functor construction explains the weak Hopf algebra structure 'in a new sense' without additional hidden choices is not independently verifiable in this manuscript, as no explicit definition, uniqueness argument, or check against alternative choices is supplied; readers must consult the referenced prior paper for any load-bearing details.

    Authors: We agree that the detailed construction of the fiber functor, including its explicit definition, uniqueness arguments, and verification that it introduces no additional hidden choices, appears in our prior technical work rather than here. This manuscript is deliberately a non-technical historical overview, so full load-bearing details are referenced rather than reproduced. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract and the recent progress section to state explicitly that the complete technical arguments and checks are contained in the cited prior paper, while retaining the overview character and highlighting the new perspective. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central fiber-functor claim justified only by self-citation to authors' recent work

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "Our recent approach to the Finkelberg-Kazhdan-Lusztig equivalence theorem centers on the construction of a fiber functor associated with the categories in the equivalence theorem, which in turn explains the underlying algebraic and analytic structure of the corresponding weak Hopf algebra in a new sense."

    The paper's core explanatory claim is the existence and properties of this fiber functor. The text immediately refers the construction and proof to the authors' recent work, with no explicit functor definition, uniqueness theorem, or check against alternative choices supplied here. The justification therefore reduces to self-citation whose content is not independently reproduced or verified within the present document.

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly a non-technical historical overview whose strongest claim is that the Finkelberg-Kazhdan-Lusztig equivalence is explained by a fiber functor whose construction yields new algebraic and analytic properties of the associated weak Hopf algebra. The abstract and skeptic load-bearing attack both state that the detailed construction, uniqueness argument, and verification against hidden choices are deferred to the authors' own prior paper. No independent definition, equation, or external benchmark appears in the provided text, so the load-bearing step reduces to self-citation. This matches pattern 3 (self-citation load-bearing) and produces a moderate circularity score of 6; the overview itself contains no further self-referential reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The provided abstract introduces no explicit free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities; the discussion remains at the level of summarizing an existing proof strategy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5396 in / 1152 out tokens · 55710 ms · 2026-05-16T06:19:57.973939+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 114 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Alvarez-Gaum´ e, C

    L. Alvarez-Gaum´ e, C. Gomez, G. Sierra: Quantum group interpretation of some conformal field theories,Phys. Lett.,B 220(1989) 142–152

  2. [2]

    Andersen: Tensor products of quantized tilting modules,Commun

    H.H. Andersen: Tensor products of quantized tilting modules,Commun. Math. Phys.,149(1992), 149–159

  3. [3]

    Banica: Th´ eorie des repr´ esentations du groupe quantique compact libreO(n),C

    T. Banica: Th´ eorie des repr´ esentations du groupe quantique compact libreO(n),C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math.,322(1996), 241–244

  4. [4]

    Banica, Le groupe quantique compact libreU(n),Commun

    T. Banica, Le groupe quantique compact libreU(n),Commun. Math. Phys.,190(1997), 143–172

  5. [5]

    R. J. Baxter: Partition function of the eight-vertex lattice model,Ann. Phys.,70(1972), 193–288

  6. [6]

    A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov: Infinite conformal symmetry in two- dimensional quantum field theory,Nucl. Phys. B241(1984), , 333–380

  7. [7]

    Birman, H

    J. Birman, H. Wenzl: Braid, links and a new algebra,Tran Amer. Math. Soc.,313(1989), 239–245

  8. [8]

    Bichon, A

    J. Bichon, A. De Rijdt, S. Vaes: Ergodic coactions with large multiplicity and monoidal equivalence of quantum groups,Commun. Math. Phys,262(2006), 703–728

  9. [9]

    Borcherds: Vertex algebras, Kac-Moody algebras, and the Monster, Proc

    R. Borcherds: Vertex algebras, Kac-Moody algebras, and the Monster, Proc. of the National Acad- emy of Sciences83,(1986) 3068–3071

  10. [10]

    Chari, A.N

    V. Chari, A.N. Pressley: A guide to quantum groups. Cambridge University Press, 1995

  11. [11]

    Ciamprone, C

    S. Ciamprone, C. Pinzari: Quasi-coassociativeC ∗-quantum groupoids of typeAand modularC ∗- categories,Adv. Math.,322(2017), 971–1032

  12. [12]

    Ciamprone, M.V

    S. Ciamprone, M.V. Giannone, C. Pinzari: Weak quasi-Hopf algebras, tensorC ∗-categories and conformal field theory, and the Kazhdan-Lusztig-Finkelberg theorem, arXiv:2101.10016v13s

  13. [13]

    Connes: Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press (1994)

    A. Connes: Noncommutative Geometry, Academic Press (1994). THE BRAIDED DOPLICHER-ROBERTS PROGRAM 29

  14. [14]

    De Commer, S

    K. De Commer, S. Neshveyev, L. Tuset, M. Yamashita: Ribbon Braided Module Categories, Quan- tum Symmetric Pairs and Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov Equations,Comm. Math. Phys.,367, (2019), 717–769

  15. [15]

    De Commer, S

    K. De Commer, S. Neshveyev, L. Tuset, L., M. Yamashita: Comparison of quantizations of symmetric spaces: cyclotomic Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equations and Letzter-Kolb coideals, arXiv:2009.06018

  16. [16]

    Tannaka-Krein duality for compact quantum homogeneous spaces. I. General theory

    K. De Commer, M. Yamashita: Tannaka-Krein duality for compact quantum homogeneous spaces. I. General theory, arXiv:1211.6552 (2012)

  17. [17]

    Dijkgraaf, V

    R. Dijkgraaf, V. Pasquier, P. Roche: Quasi-Hopf algebras group cohomology and orbifold models, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.)18B(1990), 60–72

  18. [18]

    C. Dong, H. Li, G. Mason: Vertex operator algebras and associative algebras.J. Algebra.206 (1998), 67-96

  19. [19]

    Dong and X

    C. Dong and X. Lin: Unitary vertex operator algebras.J. Algebra.397(2014), 252-277

  20. [20]

    Doplicher, R

    S. Doplicher, R. Haag, J.E. Roberts: Local observables and particle statistics I, II.Commun. Math. Phys.23, 199 (1971) and35, 49 (1974)

  21. [21]

    Doplicher, J.E

    S. Doplicher, J.E. Roberts: A new duality theory for compact groups,Invent. Math.,98(1989), 157–218

  22. [22]

    Doplicher, J.E

    S. Doplicher, J.E. Roberts: Endomorphisms ofC ∗-algebras, cross products and duality for compact groups,Ann. Math.,130, (1989), 75–119

  23. [23]

    Doplicher, J

    S. Doplicher, J. E. Roberts, Why there is a field algebra with a compact gauge group describing the superselection structure in particle physics,Commun. Math. Phys,131(1990), 51–107

  24. [24]

    Drinfeld: Hopf Algebras and the Quantum Yang-Baxter Equation,Soviet Math

    V.G. Drinfeld: Hopf Algebras and the Quantum Yang-Baxter Equation,Soviet Math. Doklady,32 (1985) 254–258

  25. [25]

    Drinfeld: Quantum groups, Proc

    V.G. Drinfeld: Quantum groups, Proc. ICM (Berkeley, 1986), vol.1, 798–820. Amer.Math.Soc., 1987

  26. [26]

    V. G. Drinfeld: Quasi-Hopf algebras,Leningrad Math. J.,1(1990), 1419–1457

  27. [27]

    V. G. Drinfeld: On almost cocommutative Hopf algebras,Algebra Anal.1(1989), n. 230–46; English transl. inLeningrad Math. J.1(1990)

  28. [28]

    L. D. Faddeev: Inverse problem of quantum scattering theory,Usp. Matem. Nauk,14(1959), 57–119

  29. [29]

    Faddeev: Inverse problem of quantum scattering theory

    L.D. Faddeev: Inverse problem of quantum scattering theory. II,J. Math. Sci.,5(1976), 334–396

  30. [30]

    L. D. Faddeev, E. K. Sklyanin, L.A.. Takhtajan:The quantum inverse problem method. 1.,Theor. Math. Phys.,40(1980), 688–706

  31. [31]

    Finkelberg: An equivalence of fusion categories,Geom

    M. Finkelberg: An equivalence of fusion categories,Geom. Funct. Anal.,6(1996), 249–267

  32. [32]

    Finkelberg: Erratum to: an equivalence of fusion categories,Geom

    M. Finkelberg: Erratum to: an equivalence of fusion categories,Geom. Funct. Anal.,23(2013), 810–811

  33. [33]

    Fredenhagen, K.H

    K. Fredenhagen, K.H. Rehren, B. Schroer: Superselection sectors with braid group statistics and exchange algebras, I: General theory,Commun. Math. Phys.125, 201–226 (1989)

  34. [34]

    K- Fredenhagen: Structure of superselection sectors in low-dimensional quantum field theory, in: XVII International conference on Differential Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics: Physics and Geometry, Davis 1989

  35. [35]

    Frenkel, J

    I. Frenkel, J . Lepowsky, A. Meurman: Vertex Operator Algebras and the Monster, Pure and Appl. Math., vol. 134, Academic Press, Boston, 1988

  36. [36]

    Frenkel, Y.Zhu: Vertex operator algebras associated to representations of affine and Virasoro algebras,66Duke Math

    I.B. Frenkel, Y.Zhu: Vertex operator algebras associated to representations of affine and Virasoro algebras,66Duke Math. J., (1992) 123–168

  37. [37]

    Fr¨ olich: Statistics of fields, the Yang-Baxter equation and the theory of knots and links, in: Nonperturbative quantum field theory, G

    J. Fr¨ olich: Statistics of fields, the Yang-Baxter equation and the theory of knots and links, in: Nonperturbative quantum field theory, G. t’Hooft et al (eds), Plenum Press, 1988, Nato Science Series B:, vol 185. Springer, New York, NY. 30 C. PINZARI

  38. [38]

    Fr¨ olich, F

    J. Fr¨ olich, F. Gabbiani, P.A. Marchetti: Superselection structure and statistics in three dimensional local quantum theory, preprint ETH-TH/89-22; Braid statistics in three-dimensional local quantum theory, ETH-TH/89-36, in: Proceedings Physics, Geometry, and Topology, Banff 1989

  39. [39]

    Galindo: On braided and ribbon unitary fusion categories,Canad

    C. Galindo: On braided and ribbon unitary fusion categories,Canad. Math. Bull.,57(2014), 506–510

  40. [40]

    Goodman, P

    F.M. Goodman, P. de la Harpe, and V.F.R. Jones: Coxeter graphs and towers of algebras (Vol. 14). Springer Science and Business Media

  41. [41]

    Gui: Unitarity of the modular tensor categories associated to unitary vertex operator algebras, I:Commun

    B. Gui: Unitarity of the modular tensor categories associated to unitary vertex operator algebras, I:Commun. Math. Phys.,366, (2019) 333–396

  42. [42]

    Gui: Unitarity of the modular tensor categories associated to unitary vertex operator algebras, II:Commun

    B. Gui: Unitarity of the modular tensor categories associated to unitary vertex operator algebras, II:Commun. Math. Phys.372(2019) 893–950

  43. [43]

    Gui: Energy bounds condition for intertwining operators of type B, C, and G2 unitary affine vertex operator algebrasTrans

    B. Gui: Energy bounds condition for intertwining operators of type B, C, and G2 unitary affine vertex operator algebrasTrans. Amer. Math. Soc.372 (2019), 7371–7424

  44. [44]

    Gui: Unbounded field operators in categorical extensions of conformal nets,Invent

    B. Gui: Unbounded field operators in categorical extensions of conformal nets,Invent. Math, (2026), 1–67, arXiv:2001.03095

  45. [45]

    Gui: Categorical extensions of conformal nets,Comm

    B. Gui: Categorical extensions of conformal nets,Comm. Math. Phys.383, 763–839 (2021)

  46. [46]

    Haag and D

    R. Haag and D. Kastler, An algebraic approach to quantum field theory,J. Math. Phys.5(1964), 848-861

  47. [47]

    Haag: Local quantum physics: Fields, particles, algebras

    R. Haag: Local quantum physics: Fields, particles, algebras. Springer Science and Business Media, 2012

  48. [48]

    H¨ aring-Oldenburg: Reconstruction of weak quasi-Hopf algebras,J

    R. H¨ aring-Oldenburg: Reconstruction of weak quasi-Hopf algebras,J. Alg,194, (1997) 14–35

  49. [49]

    T. He, P. Mitra, and A. Strominger: 2DKac-Moody symmetry of 4DYang-Mills theory,J. High Energy Phys.,10, (2016) 1–19,

  50. [50]

    Affine Lie algebras and tensor categories

    Y.-Z. Huang: Affine Lie algebras and tensor categories, arXiv:1811.05123

  51. [51]

    Jimbo: Aq-Difference Analogue ofU(g) and the Yang-Baxter Equation,Lett

    M. Jimbo: Aq-Difference Analogue ofU(g) and the Yang-Baxter Equation,Lett. Math. Phys., 10 (1985) 63–69

  52. [52]

    Jones: Index for subfactors,Invent

    V.F.R. Jones: Index for subfactors,Invent. Math.72(1983), 1–25

  53. [53]

    Jones: A polynomial invariant for knots via von Neumann algebras.Bull

    V.F.R. Jones: A polynomial invariant for knots via von Neumann algebras.Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 12, (1985) 103–111

  54. [54]

    Jones: Hecke algebra representations of braid groups,Ann

    V.F.R. Jones: Hecke algebra representations of braid groups,Ann. Math.,126(1987), 335–388

  55. [55]

    V. F. R. Jones: In and around the origin of quantum groups. arXiv preprint math/0309199

  56. [56]

    Kac: Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras

    V.G. Kac: Infinite-dimensional Lie algebras. Cambridge university press, 1990

  57. [57]

    Kazhdan, G

    D. Kazhdan, G. Lusztig: Tensor structures arising from affine Lie algebras. I,J. Amer. Math. Soc., 6(1993), 905–947; II, J. AMS,6(1993), 949–1011; III, J. AMS,7(1994), 335–381; IV, J. AMS,7 (1994), 383–453

  58. [58]

    Kazhdan, H

    D. Kazhdan, H. Wenzl: Reconstructing monoidal categories,Adv. Soviet Math.,16(1993), 111–135

  59. [59]

    A. N. Kirillov, N. Yu. Reshetikhin: Representation of the algebrasUq(sl2),q-orthogonal polynomials and invariants of links, inInfinite dimensional Lie lgebras and groups, V. G. Kac (Ed), 285–339, World Scientific, Singapore. Yangians and multiplicities of occurrence of the irreducible components of the tensor product of representations of simple Lie algeb...

  60. [60]

    V. G. Knizhnik and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Current Algebra and Wess-Zumino Model in Two- Dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B247(1984), 83–103

  61. [61]

    Kohno, Monodromy representations of braid groups and Yang-Baxter equations,Ann

    T. Kohno, Monodromy representations of braid groups and Yang-Baxter equations,Ann. Inst. Fourier,37(1987), 139–160

  62. [62]

    Lehrer, R

    G.I. Lehrer, R. B.Zhang: Strongly multiplicity free modules for Lie algebras and quantum groups, J. Alg.,306(2006), 138-174

  63. [63]

    G. Mack, V. Schomerus: Conformal field algebras with quantum symmetry from the theory of superselection sectors,Commun. Math. Phys.,134, 139–196, (1990)

  64. [64]

    G. Mack, V. Schomerus: Quasi quantum group symmetry and local braid relations in the conformal Ising model,Phys. Lett.,B267(1991), 207–213. THE BRAIDED DOPLICHER-ROBERTS PROGRAM 31

  65. [65]

    G. Mack, V. Schomerus: Quasi Hopf quantum symmetry in quantum theory,Nucl. Phys.,B 370, (1992) 185–230

  66. [66]

    Majid: Reconstruction theorems and RCQFT,Internat

    S. Majid: Reconstruction theorems and RCQFT,Internat. J. Modern Phys.,6, No. 24, (1991), 4359–4374

  67. [67]

    Majid: Tannaka-Krein theorems for quasi-Hopf algebras and other results,Contemp

    S. Majid: Tannaka-Krein theorems for quasi-Hopf algebras and other results,Contemp. Math. Phys.,134(1992), 219

  68. [68]

    Martirosyan, H

    L. Martirosyan, H. Wenzl: Affine centralizer algebras, forG 2,IMRN,12(2019), 3812–3831

  69. [69]

    B. M. McCoy: The Baxter revolution,J. Stat. Phys.,102(2001), 375–384

  70. [70]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Seiberg: Classical and quantum conformal field theory,Commun. Math. Phys., 123(1989), 177–254

  71. [71]

    A comment on quantum symmetry in conformal field theories,Nucl. Phys. B,328(1989), 557–574

  72. [72]

    Morrison: The braid group surjects ontoG 2 tensor space,Pacific J

    S. Morrison: The braid group surjects ontoG 2 tensor space,Pacific J. Math.,249(2011), 189–198

  73. [73]

    Mund, K.-H

    J. Mund, K.-H. Rehren, B. Schroer: Infraparticle quantum fields and the formation of photon clouds,J. of High Energy Physics,4(2022), 1-60

  74. [74]

    Murakami: The Kauffman polynomial of links and representation theory,Osaka J

    J. Murakami: The Kauffman polynomial of links and representation theory,Osaka J. Math.,24 (1987), 745–758

  75. [75]

    Neshveyev, L

    S. Neshveyev, L. Tuset: The Dirac operator on compact quantum groups,J. Reine Angew. Math. (Crelles Journal)641(2010), 1–20

  76. [76]

    Pinzari: Embedding ergodic actions of compact quantum groups onC ∗-algebras into quotient spaces.,Int

    C. Pinzari: Embedding ergodic actions of compact quantum groups onC ∗-algebras into quotient spaces.,Int. J. Math.,18(2007), 137–164

  77. [77]

    Pinzari: The representation category of the Woronowicz quantum group SU µ(d) as a braided tensorC ∗-category,Int

    C. Pinzari: The representation category of the Woronowicz quantum group SU µ(d) as a braided tensorC ∗-category,Int. J. Math.,18(2007), 113–136

  78. [78]

    Pinzari, J

    C. Pinzari, J. E. Roberts: A duality theorem for ergodic actions of compact quantum groups on C ∗–algebras,Commun. Math. Phys.,277(2008), 385–421

  79. [79]

    Pinzari, J

    C. Pinzari, J. E. Roberts: A theory of induction and classification of tensorC ∗-categories,J. Noncomm. Geom.6(2012), 665–719

  80. [80]

    Constructing equivalences between fusion categories of quantum groups and of vertex operator algebras via quantum gauge groups

    C. Pinzari: Constructing equivalences between fusion categories of quantum groups and of affine vertex operator algebras at positive integer levels, preprint 2025, arXiv:2502.06229

Showing first 80 references.