TimeChat-Captioner: Scripting Multi-Scene Videos with Time-Aware and Structural Audio-Visual Captions
read the original abstract
This paper proposes Omni Dense Captioning, a novel task designed to generate continuous, fine-grained, and structured audio-visual narratives with explicit timestamps. To ensure dense semantic coverage, we introduce a six-dimensional structural schema to create "script-like" captions, enabling readers to vividly imagine the video content scene by scene, akin to a cinematographic screenplay. To facilitate research, we construct OmniDCBench, a high-quality, human-annotated benchmark, and propose SodaM, a unified metric that evaluates time-aware detailed descriptions while mitigating scene boundary ambiguity. Furthermore, we construct a training dataset, TimeChatCap-42K, and present TimeChat-Captioner-7B, a strong baseline trained via SFT and GRPO with task-specific rewards. Extensive experiments demonstrate that TimeChat-Captioner-7B achieves state-of-the-art performance, surpassing Gemini-2.5-Pro, while its generated dense descriptions significantly boost downstream capabilities in audio-visual reasoning (DailyOmni and WorldSense) and temporal grounding (Charades-STA). All datasets, models, and code are available at https://github.com/yaolinli/TimeChat-Captioner.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
OmniScript: Towards Audio-Visual Script Generation for Long-Form Cinematic Video
OmniScript is a new 8B omni-modal model that turns long cinematic videos into scene-by-scene scripts and matches top proprietary models on temporal localization and semantic accuracy.
-
CineCap: Structured Reasoning with Spatio-Temporal Anchors for Cinematographic Video Captioning
CineCap combines structured reasoning and RL rewards to outperform baselines on cinematographic video captioning using a new 472-pair benchmark.
-
DiffCap-Bench: A Comprehensive, Challenging, Robust Benchmark for Image Difference Captioning
DiffCap-Bench supplies a diverse IDC benchmark with ten categories and LLM judging grounded in human difference lists to evaluate MLLMs more robustly than prior lexical metrics.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.