pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.09137 · v3 · submitted 2026-02-09 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · math.AP· math.DS· math.OC

From oblique-wave forcing to streak reinforcement: A perturbation-based frequency-response framework

Du\v{s}an Bo\v{z}i\'c , Anubhav Dwivedi , Mihailo R. Jovanovi\'c This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 05:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn math.APmath.DSmath.OC
keywords perturbation analysisresolvent operatorstreak formationlift-up mechanismsubcritical transitionoblique wavesnonlinear interactionswall-bounded shear flows
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quadratic interactions of unsteady oblique waves generate steady streamwise streaks whose structure is captured by the second output singular function of the streamwise-constant resolvent operator.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a perturbation-based frequency-response framework to analyze amplification mechanisms in wall-bounded shear flows. It shows that at second order, quadratic interactions between unsteady oblique waves produce steady streamwise streaks through the lift-up mechanism. The spatial structure of these streaks matches the second output singular function of the streamwise-constant resolvent operator. Higher-order nonlinear couplings between the oblique waves and the induced streaks introduce additional streak components, with their relative phase controlling whether the primary streak is reinforced or attenuated. The analysis locates a critical forcing amplitude at which the weakly nonlinear regime collapses, and this threshold aligns with the appearance of secondary instability in direct numerical simulations, thereby connecting non-modal streak amplification to modal instability inside one expansion derived from the Navier-Stokes equations.

Core claim

By systematically expanding the input-output dynamics of fluctuations about the laminar base flow with respect to forcing amplitude, quadratic interactions of unsteady oblique waves are shown to generate steady streamwise streaks via the lift-up mechanism, with their spatial structure captured by the second output singular function of the streamwise-constant resolvent operator. At higher orders, nonlinear coupling between oblique waves and induced streaks acts as structured forcing of the laminar linearized dynamics, yielding additional streak components whose relative phase governs reinforcement or attenuation. The framework identifies a critical forcing amplitude marking the breakdown of a

What carries the argument

the second output singular function of the streamwise-constant resolvent operator, which captures the spatial structure of streaks generated by quadratic interactions of oblique waves through the lift-up mechanism

If this is right

  • The spatial structure of streaks generated by quadratic oblique-wave interactions matches the second output singular function of the streamwise-constant resolvent operator.
  • Higher-order couplings produce additional streak components whose relative phase determines reinforcement or attenuation of the leading streak.
  • Breakdown of the weakly nonlinear regime occurs at a critical forcing amplitude that coincides with the onset of secondary instability.
  • The framework unifies non-modal amplification, streak formation, and modal instability within a single formulation derived from the Navier-Stokes equations.
  • The resulting description of transition is mechanistically transparent and computationally efficient compared with full nonlinear simulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same expansion could be applied to other base flows to estimate transition amplitudes without requiring exhaustive direct numerical simulations.
  • Phase control of streak reinforcement suggests targeted forcing strategies that might delay or accelerate transition in practical shear flows.
  • Extensions of the perturbation ordering to three-dimensional or time-varying base profiles might reveal analogous streak mechanisms in more complex geometries.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbation expansion remains valid up to the identified critical forcing amplitude and the breakdown observed in direct numerical simulations is produced by the same nonlinear interactions modeled in the expansion.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of the streak spatial structure predicted by the second output singular function against the streaks measured in low-amplitude direct numerical simulations, together with verification that the predicted critical amplitude coincides with the onset of sustained unsteadiness in those simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.09137 by Anubhav Dwivedi, Du\v{s}an Bo\v{z}i\'c, Mihailo R. Jovanovi\'c.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Pressure driven flow between two parallel infinitely long plates with parabolic laminar velocity profile. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. For small-amplitude exogenous inputs, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) shows the dependence of the square of the H∞ norm on the wavenumbers (kx, kz). The dark-red region indicates strong amplification of streamwise-elongated flow structures with a characteristic spanwise length scale of order O(1). The largest amplification occurs at (kx, kz) = (0, 1.65), and steady disturbances (ω = 0) experience the greatest gain; see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Spatial wavenumbers that arise in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Energy amplification as a function of the spanwise wavenumber [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a,b) Energy amplification of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Wall-normal profiles of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a) Singular values of the frequency response operator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Contribution of the second output mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Block diagram illustrating the coupling structure of the steady, streamwise-constant model governing the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. DNS results for (a) the streak response and (b) the mean-flow deformation, both scaled with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. DNS results for (a) the streak response and (b) the mean-flow deformation, both scaled with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Graphical representation of the perturbation expansion of the Navier–Stokes equations, analogous to diagrammatic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. (a) Wall-normal profiles of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Higher-order streak responses for different oblique-wave forcing parameters. Panel (a) corresponds to ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. (a) Energy fraction of the principal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Cosine of the streamwise phase shift [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Comparison between second-order Shanks-transformed perturbation predictions (computed via the vector epsilon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. DNS results for Poiseuille flow at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. DNS results for Poiseuille flow at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21. (a,b) Largest real part of the eigenspectrum associated with linearization about the spanwise-periodic base flow ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22. (a,b) Estimated critical forcing amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23. (a) Largest real part of the eigenspectrum obtained by linearizing about the spanwise-periodic base flow ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24. Comparison of the steady streamwise streak response obtained using the harmonic balance method (solid lines) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25. The second-order steady streamwise streak response to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_25.png] view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26. Approximated fourth-order (a) streak and (b) mean-flow fluctuation responses from DNS (solid lines) for forcing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_26.png] view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: FIG. 27. Isosurfaces of the oblique-wave velocity components [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_27.png] view at source ↗
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: FIG. 28. Estimated critical forcing amplitude obtained by approximating the limit in ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_28.png] view at source ↗
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: FIG. 29. (a) Estimated minimal critical forcing amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_29.png] view at source ↗
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: FIG. 30. Perturbation-analysis predictions of the dominant contributions to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_30.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a perturbation-based frequency-response framework for analyzing amplification mechanisms that are central to subcritical routes to transition in wall-bounded shear flows. By systematically expanding the input-output dynamics of fluctuations about the laminar base flow with respect to forcing amplitude, we establish a rigorous correspondence between linear resolvent analysis and higher-order nonlinear interactions. At second order, quadratic interactions of unsteady oblique waves generate steady streamwise streaks via the lift-up mechanism. We demonstrate that the spatial structure of these streaks is captured by the second output singular function of the streamwise-constant resolvent operator. At higher orders, nonlinear coupling between oblique waves and induced streaks acts as structured forcing of the laminar linearized dynamics, yielding additional streak components whose relative phase governs reinforcement or attenuation of the leading-order streak response. Our analysis identifies a critical forcing amplitude marking the breakdown of the weakly nonlinear regime, beyond which direct numerical simulations exhibit sustained unsteadiness. We show that this breakdown coincides with the onset of secondary instability, revealing that the nonlinear interactions responsible for streak formation also drive the modal growth central to classical transition theory. The resulting framework provides a mechanistically transparent and computationally efficient description of transition that unifies non-modal amplification, streak formation, and modal instability within a single formulation derived directly from the Navier-Stokes equations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a perturbation-based frequency-response framework by expanding the Navier-Stokes input-output dynamics about the laminar base flow in powers of forcing amplitude. At second order, quadratic interactions of unsteady oblique waves generate steady streamwise streaks via the lift-up mechanism, with the streak structure shown to match the second output singular function of the streamwise-constant resolvent operator. Higher-order couplings produce additional streak components whose relative phase controls reinforcement or attenuation; a critical amplitude is identified at which the weakly nonlinear regime breaks down, coinciding with the onset of secondary instability in DNS, thereby unifying non-modal amplification, streak formation, and modal instability within a single NS-derived formulation.

Significance. If the central correspondence and breakdown identification hold, the framework supplies a mechanistically transparent, computationally efficient route to transition prediction that directly links resolvent analysis to classical secondary instability without ad-hoc parameters. The direct derivation from the Navier-Stokes equations and the explicit connection between singular functions and nonlinear streak generation are notable strengths that could influence both theoretical and applied studies of subcritical transition.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5 (critical amplitude and DNS comparison)] The load-bearing claim that breakdown at the identified critical forcing amplitude coincides with secondary instability onset (abstract and §5) requires explicit verification that the perturbation series remains ordered and convergent there. The manuscript shows qualitative agreement between the truncated expansion and DNS up to that amplitude, but lacks quantitative bounds on the O(ε³) remainder or a direct comparison of the retained terms versus full nonlinear evolution at the critical value; without this, the claimed rigorous unification cannot be confirmed for the relevant regime.
  2. [§3.2, Eq. (18)–(20)] §3.2, Eq. (18)–(20): the assertion that the streak spatial structure is captured by the second output singular function of the streamwise-constant resolvent is central, yet the quantitative match (e.g., inner-product overlap or L2 error) between the second-order streak and the singular vector is not reported; a table or figure quantifying this overlap across Reynolds numbers and wave parameters is needed to substantiate the claimed correspondence.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the forcing amplitude ε and the ordering of terms is introduced clearly in §2 but occasionally used inconsistently in later figures; a single consolidated table of symbols would improve readability.
  2. [Figure 4] Figure 4 (DNS streak visualization) would benefit from an overlaid contour of the predicted second-order streak to allow direct visual comparison of phase and amplitude.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important aspects of verification and quantification that we address below. We maintain that the framework provides a direct NS-derived link between resolvent analysis and streak dynamics, but we agree that additional quantitative support will strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§5 (critical amplitude and DNS comparison)] The load-bearing claim that breakdown at the identified critical forcing amplitude coincides with secondary instability onset (abstract and §5) requires explicit verification that the perturbation series remains ordered and convergent there. The manuscript shows qualitative agreement between the truncated expansion and DNS up to that amplitude, but lacks quantitative bounds on the O(ε³) remainder or a direct comparison of the retained terms versus full nonlinear evolution at the critical value; without this, the claimed rigorous unification cannot be confirmed for the relevant regime.

    Authors: We agree that the ordering of the perturbation series at the critical amplitude merits further discussion. The manuscript already demonstrates that the truncated expansion reproduces the DNS streak amplitude up to the identified threshold and that this threshold aligns with the onset of secondary instability. However, deriving rigorous a priori bounds on the O(ε³) remainder for the asymptotic expansion is not feasible within the present analysis, as the series is not expected to be uniformly convergent. We will revise §5 to include explicit magnitude comparisons of the first-, second-, and third-order terms evaluated at the critical amplitude, together with a clearer statement of the regime in which the truncation remains ordered. This will substantiate the breakdown identification without overstating convergence properties. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§3.2, Eq. (18)–(20)] §3.2, Eq. (18)–(20): the assertion that the streak spatial structure is captured by the second output singular function of the streamwise-constant resolvent is central, yet the quantitative match (e.g., inner-product overlap or L2 error) between the second-order streak and the singular vector is not reported; a table or figure quantifying this overlap across Reynolds numbers and wave parameters is needed to substantiate the claimed correspondence.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The structural agreement is illustrated in the existing figures of §3.2, but we concur that quantitative metrics would provide stronger substantiation. In the revised manuscript we will add a table (or supplementary figure) reporting the inner-product overlap and normalized L2 error between the second-order streak solution and the second output singular vector of the streamwise-constant resolvent, evaluated across the Reynolds numbers and wave parameters examined in the study. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Rigorous a priori bounds on the O(ε³) remainder or a full convergence proof of the perturbation series at the critical amplitude

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct perturbation expansion of Navier-Stokes equations yields non-circular correspondence to resolvent structures

full rationale

The paper constructs its frequency-response framework by systematically expanding the input-output dynamics of fluctuations about the laminar base flow with respect to forcing amplitude, directly from the Navier-Stokes equations. This produces the claimed correspondence between linear resolvent analysis and higher-order nonlinear interactions, with streak structures emerging from quadratic terms via the lift-up mechanism and captured by resolvent singular functions as a derived consequence rather than an input. No quantities are defined in terms of themselves, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing steps reduce to self-citations or ansatzes; the critical amplitude and secondary instability coincidence are presented as outcomes of the expansion and DNS comparison. The derivation remains self-contained from first principles.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on a regular perturbation expansion of the Navier-Stokes equations about the laminar base flow; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The Navier-Stokes equations govern incompressible wall-bounded shear flow
    Invoked as the starting point for the input-output expansion.
  • domain assumption A regular perturbation expansion in forcing amplitude is valid for sufficiently small amplitudes
    Required for the ordering of linear, quadratic, and higher-order terms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5553 in / 1389 out tokens · 36006 ms · 2026-05-16T05:09:28.452138+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    At second order, quadratic interactions of unsteady oblique waves generate steady streamwise streaks via the lift-up mechanism. We demonstrate that the spatial structure of these streaks is captured by the second output singular function of the streamwise-constant resolvent operator.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. G. Drazin and W. H. Reid,Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1981

    work page 1981

  2. [2]

    Accurate solution of the Orr-Sommerfeld equation,

    S. A. Orszag, “Accurate solution of the Orr-Sommerfeld equation,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 50, pp. 689–703, 1971

    work page 1971

  3. [3]

    P. J. Schmid and D. S. Henningson,Stability and Transition in Shear Flows. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    Secondary instability of boundary layers,

    T. Herbert, “Secondary instability of boundary layers,”Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., vol. 20, pp. 487–526, 1988

    work page 1988

  5. [5]

    Transition in boundary layers subject to free-stream turbulence,

    L. Brandt, P. Schlatter, and D. S. Henningson, “Transition in boundary layers subject to free-stream turbulence,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 517, pp. 167–198, 2004

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    On stability of streamwise streaks and transition thresholds in plane channel flows,

    S. C. Reddy, P. J. Schmid, J. S. Baggett, and D. S. Henningson, “On stability of streamwise streaks and transition thresholds in plane channel flows,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 365, pp. 269–303, 1998

    work page 1998

  7. [7]

    Three-dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow,

    K. M. Butler and B. F. Farrell, “Three-dimensional optimal perturbations in viscous shear flow,”Phys. Fluids A, vol. 4, pp. 1637–1650, 1992

    work page 1992

  8. [8]

    Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues,

    L. N. Trefethen, A. E. Trefethen, S. C. Reddy, and T. A. Driscoll, “Hydrodynamic stability without eigenvalues,”Science, vol. 261, no. 5121, pp. 578–584, 1993

    work page 1993

  9. [9]

    Componentwise energy amplification in channel flows,

    M. R. Jovanovi´ c and B. Bamieh, “Componentwise energy amplification in channel flows,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 534, pp. 145–183, 2005

    work page 2005

  10. [10]

    Nonmodal stability theory,

    P. J. Schmid, “Nonmodal stability theory,”Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., vol. 39, pp. 129–162, 2007

    work page 2007

  11. [11]

    From bypass transition to flow control and data-driven turbulence modeling: An input-output view- point,

    M. R. Jovanovi´ c, “From bypass transition to flow control and data-driven turbulence modeling: An input-output view- point,”Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 311–345, 2021

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Stability of linear flow,

    T. Ellingsen and E. Palm, “Stability of linear flow,”Phys. Fluids, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 487–488, 1975

    work page 1975

  13. [13]

    Wave breakdown and turbulence,

    M. T. Landahl, “Wave breakdown and turbulence,”SIAM J. Appl. Math., vol. 28, pp. 735–756, 1975

    work page 1975

  14. [14]

    Nonlinear nonmodal stability theory,

    R. R. Kerswell, “Nonlinear nonmodal stability theory,”Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., vol. 50, pp. 319–345, 2018

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Nonlinear input/output analysis: application to boundary layer transition,

    G. Rigas, D. Sipp, and T. Colonius, “Nonlinear input/output analysis: application to boundary layer transition,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 911, p. A15, 2021

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    A new mechanism for rapid transition involving a pair of oblique waves,

    P. J. Schmid and D. S. Henningson, “A new mechanism for rapid transition involving a pair of oblique waves,”Phys. of Fluids A: Fluid Dyn., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 1986–1989, 1992

    work page 1986

  17. [17]

    Regeneration mechanisms of near-wall turbulence structures,

    J. M. Hamilton, J. Kim, and F. Waleffe, “Regeneration mechanisms of near-wall turbulence structures,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 287, pp. 317–348, 1995

    work page 1995

  18. [18]

    On a self-sustaining process in shear flows,

    F. Waleffe, “On a self-sustaining process in shear flows,”Phys. Fluids, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 883–900, 1997

    work page 1997

  19. [19]

    Numerical and experimental investigations of oblique boundary layer tran- sition,

    S. Berlin, M. Wiegel, and D. S. Henningson, “Numerical and experimental investigations of oblique boundary layer tran- sition,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 393, pp. 23–57, 1999

    work page 1999

  20. [20]

    Oblique-mode breakdown and secondary instability in supersonic boundary layers,

    C.-L. Chang and M. R. Malik, “Oblique-mode breakdown and secondary instability in supersonic boundary layers,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 273, pp. 323––360, 1994

    work page 1994

  21. [21]

    Direct numerical simulation of complete transition to turbulence via oblique breakdown at Mach 3,

    C. S. J. Mayer, D. A. von Terzi, and H. F. Fasel, “Direct numerical simulation of complete transition to turbulence via oblique breakdown at Mach 3,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 674, pp. 5–42, 2011

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    Receptivity of a supersonic boundary layer over a flat plate. Part 3. Effects of different types of free-stream disturbances,

    Y. Ma and X. Zhong, “Receptivity of a supersonic boundary layer over a flat plate. Part 3. Effects of different types of free-stream disturbances,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 532, pp. 63–109, 2005

    work page 2005

  23. [23]

    Direct numerical simulation of transition in a sharp cone boundary layer at Mach 6: fundamental breakdown,

    J. Sivasubramanian and H. F. Fasel, “Direct numerical simulation of transition in a sharp cone boundary layer at Mach 6: fundamental breakdown,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 768, pp. 175–218, 2015

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Direct numerical simulations of hypersonic boundary-layer transition for a flared cone: funda- mental breakdown,

    C. Hader and H. F. Fasel, “Direct numerical simulations of hypersonic boundary-layer transition for a flared cone: funda- mental breakdown,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 869, pp. 341–384, 2019

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Oblique transition in hypersonic double-wedge flow,

    A. Dwivedi, G. S. Sidharth, and M. R. Jovanovi´ c, “Oblique transition in hypersonic double-wedge flow,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 948, p. A37, 2022

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Weakly nonlinear analysis of a localized disturbance in Poiseuille flow,

    D. Ponziani, C. M. Casciola, F. Zirilli, and R. Piva, “Weakly nonlinear analysis of a localized disturbance in Poiseuille flow,”Stud. Appl. Math., vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 121–141, 2000

    work page 2000

  27. [28]

    Weak nonlinearity for strong non-normality,

    Y.-M. Ducimetiere, E. Boujo, and F. Gallaire, “Weak nonlinearity for strong non-normality,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 947, p. A43, 2022

    work page 2022

  28. [29]

    On the breakdown of boundary layer streaks,

    P. Andersson, L. Brandt, A. Bottaro, and D. S. Henningson, “On the breakdown of boundary layer streaks,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 428, pp. 29–60, 2001

    work page 2001

  29. [30]

    On streak breakdown in bypass transition,

    P. Schlatter, L. Brandt, H. C. de Lange, and D. S. Henningson, “On streak breakdown in bypass transition,”Phys. Fluids, vol. 20, no. 10, p. 101505, 2008

    work page 2008

  30. [31]

    Analysis of amplification mechanisms and cross-frequency interactions in nonlinear flows via the harmonic resolvent,

    A. Padovan, S. E. Otto, and C. W. Rowley, “Analysis of amplification mechanisms and cross-frequency interactions in nonlinear flows via the harmonic resolvent,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 900, p. A14, 2020

    work page 2020

  31. [32]

    Analysis of the dynamics of subharmonic flow structures via the harmonic resolvent: Application to vortex pairing in an axisymmetric jet,

    A. Padovan and C. W. Rowley, “Analysis of the dynamics of subharmonic flow structures via the harmonic resolvent: Application to vortex pairing in an axisymmetric jet,”Phys. Rev. Fluids, vol. 7, p. 073903, 2022

    work page 2022

  32. [33]

    H2 norm of linear time-periodic systems: a perturbation analysis,

    M. R. Jovanovi´ c and M. Fardad, “H2 norm of linear time-periodic systems: a perturbation analysis,”Automatica, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2090–2098, 2008

    work page 2090

  33. [34]

    Frequency analysis and norms of distributed spatially periodic systems,

    M. Fardad, M. R. Jovanovi´ c, and B. Bamieh, “Frequency analysis and norms of distributed spatially periodic systems,” IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 2266–2279, 2008

    work page 2008

  34. [35]

    Partial differential equations with periodic coefficients and Bloch waves in crystals,

    F. Odeh and J. B. Keller, “Partial differential equations with periodic coefficients and Bloch waves in crystals,”J. Math. Phys., vol. 5, pp. 1499–1504, 1964. 38

    work page 1964

  35. [36]

    Analysis and control of linear periodically time varying systems,

    N. M. Wereley, “Analysis and control of linear periodically time varying systems,” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1991

    work page 1991

  36. [37]

    Turbulence suppression in channel flows by small amplitude transverse wall oscillations,

    M. R. Jovanovi´ c, “Turbulence suppression in channel flows by small amplitude transverse wall oscillations,”Phys. Fluids, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 014101 (11 pages), 2008

    work page 2008

  37. [38]

    Model-based design of transverse wall oscillations for turbulent drag reduction,

    R. Moarref and M. R. Jovanovi´ c, “Model-based design of transverse wall oscillations for turbulent drag reduction,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 707, pp. 205–240, 2012

    work page 2012

  38. [39]

    Controlling the onset of turbulence by streamwise traveling waves. Part 1: Receptivity analysis,

    R. Moarref and M. R. Jovanovi´ c, “Controlling the onset of turbulence by streamwise traveling waves. Part 1: Receptivity analysis,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 663, pp. 70–99, 2010

    work page 2010

  39. [40]

    Controlling the onset of turbulence by streamwise traveling waves. Part 2: Direct numerical simulations,

    B. K. Lieu, R. Moarref, and M. R. Jovanovi´ c, “Controlling the onset of turbulence by streamwise traveling waves. Part 2: Direct numerical simulations,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 663, pp. 100–119, 2010

    work page 2010

  40. [41]

    Resolvent analysis for turbulent channel flow with riblets,

    A. Chavarin and M. Luhar, “Resolvent analysis for turbulent channel flow with riblets,”AIAA Journal, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 589–599, 2020

    work page 2020

  41. [42]

    Model-based design of riblets for turbulent drag reduction,

    W. Ran, A. Zare, and M. R. Jovanovi´ c, “Model-based design of riblets for turbulent drag reduction,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 906, p. A7 (38 pages), 2021

    work page 2021

  42. [43]

    A statistical state dynamics-based study of the structure and mechanism of large-scale motions in plane Poiseuille flow,

    B. F. Farrell, P. J. Ioannou, J. Jim´ enez, N. C. Constantinou, A. Lozano-Dur´ an, and M.-A. Nikolaidis, “A statistical state dynamics-based study of the structure and mechanism of large-scale motions in plane Poiseuille flow,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 809, pp. 290–315, 2016

    work page 2016

  43. [44]

    Generalized quasilinear approximation: Application to zonal jets,

    J. B. Marston, G. P. Chini, and S. M. Tobias, “Generalized quasilinear approximation: Application to zonal jets,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 116, p. 214501, 2016

    work page 2016

  44. [45]

    Generalised quasilinear approximations of turbulent channel flow. Part 1. Streamwise nonlinear energy transfer,

    C. G. Hern´ andez, Q. Yang, and Y. Hwang, “Generalised quasilinear approximations of turbulent channel flow. Part 1. Streamwise nonlinear energy transfer,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 936, p. A33, 2022

    work page 2022

  45. [46]

    Nonlinear transformations of divergent and slowly convergent sequences,

    D. Shanks, “Nonlinear transformations of divergent and slowly convergent sequences,”J. Math. Phys., vol. 34, pp. 1–42, 1955

    work page 1955

  46. [47]

    Van Dyke,Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics, ser

    M. Van Dyke,Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics, ser. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 8. Academic Press Inc., 1964

    work page 1964

  47. [48]

    K. Zhou, J. C. Doyle, and K. Glover,Robust and Optimal Control. Prentice-Hall, 1996

    work page 1996

  48. [49]

    Well-conditioned ultraspherical and spectral integration methods for resolvent analysis of channel flows of Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids,

    G. Hariharan, S. Kumar, and M. R. Jovanovi´ c, “Well-conditioned ultraspherical and spectral integration methods for resolvent analysis of channel flows of Newtonian and viscoelastic fluids,”J. Comput. Phys., vol. 439, p. 110241 (25 pages), 2021

    work page 2021

  49. [50]

    A bisection method for computing theH ∞ norm of a transfer matrix and related problems,

    S. Boyd, “A bisection method for computing theH ∞ norm of a transfer matrix and related problems,”Math. Control Signals Syst., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 207–219, 1989

    work page 1989

  50. [51]

    Weakly nonlinear analysis of boundary layer receptivity to free-stream disturbances,

    L. Brandt, D. S. Henningson, and D. Ponziani, “Weakly nonlinear analysis of boundary layer receptivity to free-stream disturbances,”Phys. Fluids, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1426–1441, 2002

    work page 2002

  51. [52]

    A nonlinear mechanism for receptivity of free-stream disturbances,

    S. Berlin and D. S. Henningson, “A nonlinear mechanism for receptivity of free-stream disturbances,”Phys. Fluids, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 3749–3760, 1999

    work page 1999

  52. [53]

    Structured input-output analysis of transitional wall-bounded flows,

    C. Liu and D. F. Gayme, “Structured input-output analysis of transitional wall-bounded flows,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 927, p. A25, 2021

    work page 2021

  53. [54]

    Structured input-output tools for modal analysis of a transitional channel flow,

    T. Mushtaq, D. Bhattacharjee, P. J. Seiler, and M. Hemati, “Structured input-output tools for modal analysis of a transitional channel flow,” inAIAA SciTech 2023 Forum, 2023, p. 1805

    work page 2023

  54. [55]

    Model-based scaling of the streamwise energy density in high-Reynolds-number turbulent channels,

    R. Moarref, A. S. Sharma, J. A. Tropp, and B. J. McKeon, “Model-based scaling of the streamwise energy density in high-Reynolds-number turbulent channels,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 734, pp. 275–316, 2013

    work page 2013

  55. [56]

    ChannelFlow: A spectral Navier–Stokes simulator in C++,

    J. F. Gibson, “ChannelFlow: A spectral Navier–Stokes simulator in C++,” University of New Hampshire, Tech. Rep., 2014,channelflow.org

    work page 2014

  56. [57]

    Transition of streamwise streaks in zero-pressure-gradient boundary layers,

    L. Brandt and D. S. Henningson, “Transition of streamwise streaks in zero-pressure-gradient boundary layers,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 472, pp. 229–261, 2002

    work page 2002

  57. [58]

    Transient growth on boundary layer streaks,

    J. Hœpffner, L. Brandt, and D. S. Henningson, “Transient growth on boundary layer streaks,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 537, pp. 91–100, 2005

    work page 2005

  58. [59]

    Coherent structure generation in near-wall turbulence,

    W. Schoppa and F. Hussain, “Coherent structure generation in near-wall turbulence,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 453, pp. 57–108, 2002

    work page 2002

  59. [60]

    A mechanism for bypass transition from localized disturbances in wall-bounded shear flows,

    D. S. Henningson, A. Lundbladh, and A. V. Johansson, “A mechanism for bypass transition from localized disturbances in wall-bounded shear flows,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 250, pp. 169–207, 1993

    work page 1993

  60. [61]

    The epsilon algorithm and related topics,

    P. R. Graves-Morris, D. E. Roberts, and A. Salam, “The epsilon algorithm and related topics,”J. Comput. Appl. Math., vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 51–80, 2000

    work page 2000

  61. [62]

    Some observations on skin friction and velocity profiles in fully developed pipe and channel flows,

    V. C. Patel and M. R. Head, “Some observations on skin friction and velocity profiles in fully developed pipe and channel flows,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 38, pp. 181–201, 1969

    work page 1969

  62. [63]

    A flow-visualization study of transition in plane Poiseuille flow,

    D. R. Carlson, S. E. Widnall, and M. F. Peeters, “A flow-visualization study of transition in plane Poiseuille flow,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 121, pp. 487–505, 1982

    work page 1982

  63. [64]

    A. H. Nayfeh and D. T. Mook,Nonlinear Oscillations. New York: Wiley, 1979

    work page 1979

  64. [65]

    Optimal disturbances and bypass transition in boundary layers,

    P. Andersson, M. Berggren, and D. S. Henningson, “Optimal disturbances and bypass transition in boundary layers,” Phys. of Fluids, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 134–150, 1999

    work page 1999

  65. [66]

    Low-dimensional modelling of turbulence using the proper orthogonal decompo- sition: a tutorial,

    T. R. Smith, J. Moehlis, and P. Holmes, “Low-dimensional modelling of turbulence using the proper orthogonal decompo- sition: a tutorial,”Nonlinear Dyn., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 275–307, 2005

    work page 2005

  66. [67]

    Model reduction for fluids, using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition,

    C. W. Rowley, “Model reduction for fluids, using balanced proper orthogonal decomposition,”Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 997–1013, 2005. 39

    work page 2005

  67. [68]

    Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data,

    P. J. Schmid, “Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 656, pp. 5–28, 2010

    work page 2010

  68. [69]

    Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows,

    C. W. Rowley, I. Mezi´ c, S. Bagheri, P. Schlatter, and D. S. Henningson, “Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 641, pp. 115–127, 2009

    work page 2009

  69. [70]

    Sparsity-promoting dynamic mode decomposition,

    M. R. Jovanovi´ c, P. J. Schmid, and J. W. Nichols, “Sparsity-promoting dynamic mode decomposition,”Phys. Fluids, vol. 26, no. 2, p. 024103 (22 pages), 2014

    work page 2014

  70. [71]

    D. J. Griffiths and D. F. Schroeter,Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018, pp. 232–276

    work page 2018

  71. [72]

    On the application of infinite systems of ordinary differential equations to perturbations of plane Poiseuille flow,

    C. L. Dolph and D. C. Lewis, “On the application of infinite systems of ordinary differential equations to perturbations of plane Poiseuille flow,”Q. Appl. Math., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 97–110, 1958

    work page 1958

  72. [73]

    Weakly nonlinear optimal perturbations,

    J. O. Pralits, A. Bottaro, and S. Cherubini, “Weakly nonlinear optimal perturbations,”J. Fluid Mech., vol. 785, pp. 135–151, 2015

    work page 2015