Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 85 references

Discrete equations from B\"{a}cklund transformations of the fifth Painlev\'{e} equation

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bäcklund chains of the fifth Painlevé equation generate four discrete equations, including a new ternary-symmetric one, with explicit rational solution hierarchies.

desk verdict Careful paper in a known tradition: the new equation is genuine but a corollary, the rational hierarchies are the real contribution, and the one load-bearing gap is identity (4.26), verified only for small m,n. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.09756 v3 pith:PSJ2CMYW submitted 2026-02-10 nlin.SI math-phmath.CAmath.MP

Peter A. Clarkson , Clare Dunning , Ben Mitchell This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SImath-phmath.CAmath.MP MSC 33E1734M5537J7039A10
keywords PainlevéVBäcklundtransformationsdiscreteequationsternarysymmetrygeneralisedLaguerrepolynomialsUmemurarationalsolutionsWronskians
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives discrete Painlevé equations from the Bäcklund transformations of the fifth Painlevé equation, producing three known equations and one new equation with ternary symmetry. Its central claim links every solution of the ternary discrete Painlevé I equation to a new step-two discrete equation whose coefficients inherit the ternary symmetry. The paper then constructs infinite hierarchies of rational solutions for these discrete equations, expressed as logarithmic derivatives of Wronskians built from Laguerre polynomials. It also exploits the known non-uniqueness of rational solutions of $P_V$ to produce pairs of structurally distinct hierarchies that satisfy the same discrete equation. If correct, this supplies the first explicit rational hierarchies for these discrete equations and introduces a genuinely new discrete integrable equation.

What carries the argument

The carrying objects are the Bäcklund transformations $R_1$ through $R_4$, which act on the parameter triples $(a_n,b_n,c_n)$ and generate the discrete chains used in the paper. Rational solutions are built from Wronskians of Laguerre polynomials: the generalised Laguerre polynomials $T^{(\mu)}_{m,n}$ and the generalised Umemura polynomials $U^{(\kappa)}_{m,n}$. Logarithmic derivatives of these determinants convert $P_V$ rational solutions into solutions of the discrete equations, with the ternary symmetry reflected in parameters $a_n$ having period-3 structure.

What would settle it

Evaluate both sides of the identity (4.26) for a non-small pair such as $(m,n) = (6,6)$ at any ordinary value of $z$; if the two sides differ, the Umemura representations of the rational solution hierarchies of the ternary $dP_I$ equation collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the fifth Painlevé equation's Bäcklund transformations can be chained into four distinct discrete Painlevé equations, and that the fourth is a new equation with ternary symmetry: every solution $x_n$ of the ternary $dP_I$ equation $x_n(x_{n+1}+x_{n-1}+1)+a_n/z=0$ satisfies the step-2 relation $a_{n+1}/(x_{n+2}+x_n+1) + a_{n-1}/(x_n+x_{n-2}+1) = z + a_n/x_n$. The paper further claims that rational solutions expressed through generalised Laguerre and generalised Umemura polynomials satisfy the asymmetric $dP_{II}$ equation, the second discrete equation, and the ternary $dP_I$ equation, giving explicit hierarchies. A final claim is that two distinct rational solutions of $P_V$ with the sa

Load-bearing premise

The proof of the Umemura-based hierarchies leans on the identity (4.26), which is checked by computer algebra for several small values of $m$ and $n$ but assumed to hold for all $m$ and $n$; a failure for any pair would invalidate those explicit determinant representations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every solution of the ternary dP_I equation automatically satisfies a new step-2 discrete equation, so the new equation inherits the full solution set and may serve as a compact reformulation of the ternary hierarchy.
  • The explicit Wronskian hierarchies provide a systematic source of rational solutions for asymmetric dP_II, the second discrete equation, and ternary dP_I.
  • Because the discrete equations are explicitly tied to Bäcklund chains of P_V, known special-function solutions of P_V (for example Kummer or Bessel functions) can be transplanted to the discrete equations, a direction the paper notes is under investigation.
  • The non-uniqueness of rational solutions of P_V leads to pairs of distinct rational hierarchies for the same discrete equation, showing that the discrete equations admit more solution families than the single-hierarchy descriptions previously suggested.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the new step-2 equation is indeed new, its ternary symmetry may reflect an underlying A_2-type affine Weyl group structure; the paper leaves that geometric interpretation implicit.
  • The identity (4.26) is verified only for small indices, so a natural test is to establish it from the known discrete equations (A.7) rather than by further spot checks.
  • The two distinct hierarchies generated from non-unique P_V solutions hint that the classification of discrete Painlevé rational solutions may mirror the continuous case's degeneracies, suggesting a richer catalogue than currently documented.
  • A testable extension is to seed the Bäcklund chains from Bessel-function solutions instead of rational ones and compare the resulting discrete solutions against the rational hierarchies to see whether genuinely new discrete transcendents appear.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper derives discrete Painlevé equations from Bäcklund transformations of the fifth Painlevé equation: asymmetric dPII (3.7), a second discrete equation (3.18), ternary dPI (3.28), and a new step-2 ternary equation (3.34). It then constructs rational hierarchies for these discrete equations using the two known families of rational solutions of PV, expressed through generalized Laguerre polynomials and generalized Umemura polynomials. The paper also exploits known non-uniqueness of some rational solutions of PV to produce distinct hierarchies that satisfy the same discrete equation, for example in §5.3.1. The derivations are explicit, and the internal bookkeeping of the parameter chains is consistent.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides the first explicit rational hierarchies for the asymmetric dPII equation, the second discrete equation (3.18), and ternary dPI in terms of Laguerre and Umemura determinants, together with a new ternary discrete equation. The explicit Bäcklund link between solutions of PV and the discrete equations is a notable strength, as is the use of non-unique PV solutions to generate structurally different hierarchies for the same discrete equation. However, one algebraic identity essential to the Umemura-based ternary-dPI hierarchies is only checked for small indices and not proved; this must be addressed before those hierarchy claims are fully established.

major comments (1)
  1. [§4.2, Lemma 4.11(c), Eq. (4.26)] Identity (4.26) is load-bearing: it is used to prove the logarithmic-derivative forms (4.23c) and (4.24c) for bu^{(κ)}_{m,n}, which in turn drive the explicit generalized-Umemura rational hierarchies for ternary dPI in Example 5.27 and Lemma 5.28. The paper states only that 'using computer algebra, we have verified equation (4.26) for several small values of m and n'. No proof or verification script is supplied, and the identity does not appear in the appendix. Since the assertion is for all m,n, a finite small-case check is not sufficient. Please supply a proof, e.g. from the bilinear identities of [52,53] or by induction on m,n, or explicitly mark the affected determinant representations and hierarchy formulas as conditional.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.4, Lemma 3.5] The statement 'Suppose that x_n, x_{n+2} and x_{n-2} are solutions of ternary dPI' is imprecise: the proof uses that the entire sequence {x_n} satisfies (3.28). Please rephrase.
  2. [§5.2.3, Example 5.27] The text says 'to the solution w^{(κ)}_{1,m}' but all surrounding notation and the resulting sequence use bw^{(κ)}_{1,m}. Please correct this notation.
  3. [Appendix A.2] Identities (A.14)–(A.17) use U^{(κ)}_{-1,-1}=...=1 although U^{(κ)}_{m,n} is defined only for m,n≥0 in Definition 4.7. Clarify the extension convention.
  4. [§4, Lemma 4.6] The Hirota operator D_z(f•g) is used in the proof of Lemma 4.6 before it is defined in (4.15). Move the definition earlier or provide a reference at first use.
  5. [Throughout] There are numerous encoding/OCR artifacts in the displayed text, e.g. 'B¨acklund', 'ean'/'ecn' for tilde parameters, and inconsistent spacing in 'dP I'. Please clean these up before final submission.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the derivation chains are self-contained and the only noted weakness is an unproved auxiliary identity, which is a proof gap rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

I traced the derivation chain from the Bäcklund transformations in §2 through the discrete equations in §3 and the rational hierarchies in §5. The discrete equations (3.7), (3.18), (3.28), and the new step-2 equation (3.34) are obtained by eliminating dw/dz between a Bäcklund transformation and its inverse, or by direct algebraic manipulation, e.g. Lemma 3.5 solves (3.28) for x_{n+1} and equates two expressions; this is not a fit or a renamed input. The §5 hierarchies are constructed by applying the explicit transformations R1, R2, R3 to rational PV solutions taken from Theorem 4.4 (cited to Clarkson–Dunning [16]) and Theorem 4.9 (cited to Masuda–Ohta–Kajiwara [53]). Since the discrete equations were derived from the same transformation triples, the proofs that consecutive transformed solutions satisfy the discrete equations are direct consequences of the construction, not circular predictions. The self-citation [16] is real external support: it is a separate published derivation of rational PV solutions, and the paper's new content — the explicit discrete hierarchies — is not contained there. The one legitimate weakness is identity (4.26), used in Lemma 4.11(c) to prove the logarithmic-derivative form (4.24c) and hence the ternary-dPI hierarchies in §5.2.3. The paper states only 'using computer algebra, we have verified equation (4.26) for several small values of m and n.' This is an unproved auxiliary algebraic lemma and a correctness risk, but it is not equivalent by construction to the claimed discrete hierarchies: the hierarchies would still be rationally generated by Theorem 4.9 through the Bäcklund chain even if the explicit log-derivative representation of bU needed repair. No self-definitional step, fitted-parameter-called-prediction, or self-citation chain forces the central results, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters and no ad hoc constants: λ, ρ, φ, μ, κ, m, n parametrize solution families and appear as part of the statements, not as tuning knobs to force a target outcome. No new entities are postulated — the new equation (3.34) is an equation, not an object. The genuine debts to prior literature are the Bäcklund transformation formulae, the rational solution classification of PV ([46]) and its determinant representations ([16], [53]), plus the polynomial identities in Appendix A; of these, only (4.26) is not fully proved in the paper or its cited sources.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Bäcklund transformation T_{ε1,ε2,ε3} defined by (2.3) maps solutions of PV (1.2) to solutions of PV with parameters (2.4), whenever conditions (2.1)–(2.2) hold.
    Invoked in Def. 2.2 and throughout §3; quoted from DLMF [62, §32.7(v)] and Gromak–Laine–Shimomura [38, §39]. All four discrete equations (3.7), (3.18), (3.28), (3.34) are obtained by eliminating the derivative between two such transformations. Not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption The rational solution classification Theorem 4.1 (cases (i)–(iii)) and the determinant representations Theorem 4.4 (generalised Laguerre, from [16]) and Theorem 4.9 (generalised Umemura, from [53]).
    The seeds for every hierarchy in §5 are these rational solutions of PV; the paper quotes the theorems and gives no alternative proof. Theorem 4.4 is prior work of two of the present authors ([16]), so the foundation is partly self-cited — but it is published with proofs, and the discrete hierarchies are not contained in it.
  • domain assumption Wronskian/determinant identities (A.1)–(A.17), (4.25) and (4.26) for the generalised Laguerre and generalised Umemura polynomials.
    Workhorse of Lemmas 4.6, 4.11 and the §5 hierarchy proofs. Most are quoted from [16, 52, 53] or derived in the appendix; (4.26) is stated as verified by computer algebra for several small m, n only — the paper's own flagged limitation (§4.2).
  • domain assumption Kitaev–Law–McLeod non-uniqueness: at most two rational solutions of PV for fixed parameters when γ ∈ Z [46, Thm. 1.2].
    The §5.3 construction of two distinct hierarchies satisfying the same discrete equation (e.g., (5.40)/(5.41) for (5.42)) relies on pairs w^{(1)}_{1,1}, u^{(1)}_{1,2} and v^{(-1)}_{3,1}, v^{(-1)}_{2,2} with identical parameters; the theorem guarantees the phenomenon and the explicit pairs are cited to [16].
  • standard math The parameter evolutions (3.4), (3.14), (3.26), stated as solutions of the linear recurrences with arbitrary constants λ, ρ, φ.
    Direct solutions of linear recurrences; load-bearing because the constant parameters in the discrete equations are read off from these. Checkable by substitution and the §5.3 spot-check ((5.42) vs (3.4)) is consistent.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Discrete equations from B\"{a}cklund transformations of the fifth Painlev\'{e} equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PSJ2CMYW

@misc{pith2026260209756,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Discrete equations from B\"acklund transformations of the fifth Painlev\'e equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PSJ2CMYW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.09756}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper discrete equations are derived from B\"{a}cklund transformations of the fifth Painlev\'{e} equation, including a new discrete equation which has ternary symmetry. There are two classes of rational solutions of the fifth Painlev\'{e} equation, one expressed in terms of the generalised Laguerre polynomials and the other in terms of the generalised Umemura polynomials, both of which can be expressed as Wronskians of Laguerre polynomials. Hierarchies of rational solutions of the discrete equations are derived in terms of the generalised Laguerre and generalised Umemura polynomials. It is known that there is nonuniqueness of some rational solutions of the fifth Painlev\'{e} equation. Pairs of nonunique rational solutions are used to derive distinct hierarchies of rational solutions which satisfy the same discrete equation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [78]

    and Ramani A., From the continuous PV to discrete Painlev´e equations,J

    Tokihiro T., Grammaticos B. and Ramani A., From the continuous PV to discrete Painlev´e equations,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.,35(2002) 5943–5950

    2002

  2. [16]

    and Dunning C., Rational solutions of the fifth Painlev´e equation

    Clarkson P.A. and Dunning C., Rational solutions of the fifth Painlev´e equation. Generalized Laguerre poly- nomials,Stud. Appl. Math.,152(2024) 453–507

    2024

  3. [1]

    Adler V.E., Nonlinear chains and Painlev ´e equations,Physica,D73(1994) 335–351

    1994

  4. [2]

    and Novokshenov V.Yu., Asymptotics of solutions of the discrete Painlev ´e I equation,Math

    Aptekarev A.I. and Novokshenov V.Yu., Asymptotics of solutions of the discrete Painlev ´e I equation,Math. Notes,116(2024) 1170–1182. 50

    2024

  5. [3]

    and Zimerman A.H., Why is my rational Painlev ´e V solution not unique?, arXiv:2307.07825

    Aratyn H., Gomes J.F., Lobo G.V. and Zimerman A.H., Why is my rational Painlev ´e V solution not unique?, arXiv:2307.07825

    arXiv

  6. [4]

    and Zimerman A.H., Two-fold degeneracy of a class of rational Painlev ´e V solutions,Open Commun

    Aratyn H., Gomes J.F., Lobo G.V. and Zimerman A.H., Two-fold degeneracy of a class of rational Painlev ´e V solutions,Open Commun. Nonlinear Math. Phys.,Special Issue 2(2024) 28–45

    2024

  7. [5]

    and Kontsevich M., Quantum minimal surfaces, arXiv:1903.10792

    Arnlind J., Hoppe J. and Kontsevich M., Quantum minimal surfaces, arXiv:1903.10792

    arXiv 1903

  8. [6]

    and Bertola M., Rational solutions of Painlev´e V from Hankel determinants and the asymptotics of their pole locations,SIGMA,21(2025) 097

    Balogoun M. and Bertola M., Rational solutions of Painlev´e V from Hankel determinants and the asymptotics of their pole locations,SIGMA,21(2025) 097

    2025

Show all 85 references
  1. [7]

    and Zuber J.B., Quantum field theory techniques in graphical enumeration,Adv

    Bessis D., Itzykson C. and Zuber J.B., Quantum field theory techniques in graphical enumeration,Adv. Appl. Math.,1(1980) 109–157

    1980

  2. [8]

    and Nevai P., Orthogonal polynomials and their derivatives

    Bonan S. and Nevai P., Orthogonal polynomials and their derivatives. I,J. Approx. Theory,40(1984) 134– 147

    1984

  3. [9]

    and Kazakov V.A., Exactly solvable field theories of closed strings,Phys

    Br ´ezin E. and Kazakov V.A., Exactly solvable field theories of closed strings,Phys. Lett. B,236(1990) 144– 150

    1990

  4. [10]

    and Huerta M., Entanglement and alpha entropies for a massive Dirac field in two dimensions.,J

    Casini H., Fosco C.D. and Huerta M., Entanglement and alpha entropies for a massive Dirac field in two dimensions.,J. Stat. Mech.(2005) P07 007

    2005

  5. [11]

    and Huerta M., Entanglement and alpha entropies for a massive scalar field in two dimensions,J

    Casini H. and Huerta M., Entanglement and alpha entropies for a massive scalar field in two dimensions,J. Stat. Mech.(2005) P12 012

    2005

  6. [12]

    and Huerta M., Analytic results on the geometric entropy for free fields,J

    Casini H. and Huerta M., Analytic results on the geometric entropy for free fields,J. Stat. Mech.(2008) P01 012

    2008

  7. [13]

    Clarkson P.A., Special polynomials associated with rational solutions of the fifth Painlev´e equation,J. Comp. Appl. Math.,178(2005) 111–129

    2005

  8. [14]

    and Van Assche W

    Clarkson P.A., Painlev´e equations-nonlinear special functions, in:Orthogonal Polynomials and Special Func- tions: Computation and Application, M`arcellan F. and Van Assche W. (Editors),Lect. Notes Math., vol.1883, pp. 331–411, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2006)

    2006

  9. [15]

    Clarkson P.A., Classical solutions of the degenerate fifth Painlev ´e equation,J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.,56 (2023) 134002

    2023

  10. [17]

    and Mitchell B., Special solutions of a discrete Painlev ´e equation for quantum minimal surfaces,Theo

    Clarkson P.A., Dzhamay A., Hone A.N.W. and Mitchell B., Special solutions of a discrete Painlev ´e equation for quantum minimal surfaces,Theo. Math. Phys.,224(2025) 1359–1397

    2025

  11. [18]

    and Webster H.N., On the relation between the continuous and discrete Painlev´e equations,Theo

    Clarkson P.A., Mansfield E.L. and Webster H.N., On the relation between the continuous and discrete Painlev´e equations,Theo. Math. Phys.,122(2000) 1–16

    2000

  12. [19]

    and Joshi N., The discrete first, second and thirty-fourth Painlev´e hierarchies,J

    Cresswell C. and Joshi N., The discrete first, second and thirty-fourth Painlev´e hierarchies,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.,32(1999) 655–669

    1999

  13. [20]

    and Willox R., What is the symmetry group of a d-P II discrete Painlev ´e equation?,Mathematics,13(2025) 1123

    Dzhamay A., Shi Y., Stokes A. and Willox R., What is the symmetry group of a d-P II discrete Painlev ´e equation?,Mathematics,13(2025) 1123

    2025

  14. [21]

    and Hoppe J., Orthogonal polynomials with complex densities and quantum minimal surfaces, SIGMA,21(2025) 103

    Felder G. and Hoppe J., Orthogonal polynomials with complex densities and quantum minimal surfaces, SIGMA,21(2025) 103

    2025

  15. [22]

    and Ablowitz M.J., On a unified approach to transformations and elementary solutions of Painlev´e equations,J

    Fokas A.S. and Ablowitz M.J., On a unified approach to transformations and elementary solutions of Painlev´e equations,J. Math. Phys.,23(1982) 2033–2042

    1982

  16. [23]

    and Ramani A., From continuous to discrete Painlev´e equations,J

    Fokas A.S., Grammaticos B. and Ramani A., From continuous to discrete Painlev´e equations,J. Math. Anal. Appl.,180(1993) 342–360

    1993

  17. [24]

    and Kitaev A.V., Discrete Painlev´e equations and their appearance in quantum-gravity, Commun

    Fokas A.S., Its A.R. and Kitaev A.V., Discrete Painlev´e equations and their appearance in quantum-gravity, Commun. Math. Phys.,142(1991) 313–344

    1991

  18. [25]

    and Novokshenov V.Yu.,Painlev´ e Transcendents: The Riemann-Hilbert approach,Math

    Fokas A.S., Its A.R., Kapaev A.A. and Novokshenov V.Yu.,Painlev´ e Transcendents: The Riemann-Hilbert approach,Math. Surv. Mono., vol.128, A.M.S., Providence, RI (2006)

    2006

  19. [26]

    and Ablowitz M.J., A method of linearisation for Painlev ´e equations: Painlev ´e IV, V, Physica,D30(1988) 247–283

    Fokas A.S., Mu ˘gan U. and Ablowitz M.J., A method of linearisation for Painlev ´e equations: Painlev ´e IV, V, Physica,D30(1988) 247–283

    1988

  20. [27]

    and Witte N.S., Application of theτ-function theory of Painlev ´e equations to random matrices: PV, PIII, the LUE, JUE, and CUE,Comm

    Forrester P.J. and Witte N.S., Application of theτ-function theory of Painlev ´e equations to random matrices: PV, PIII, the LUE, JUE, and CUE,Comm. Pure Appl. Math,55(2002) 679–727

    2002

  21. [28]

    Freud G., On the coefficients in the recursion formulae of orthogonal polynomials,Proc. R. Irish Acad., Sect. A,76(1976) 1–6

    1976

  22. [29]

    and Santos N.O., Parametrization of solutions of the Lewis metric by a Painlev ´e transcendent III,J

    Gariel J., Marcilhacy G. and Santos N.O., Parametrization of solutions of the Lewis metric by a Painlev ´e transcendent III,J. Math. Phys.,47(2006) 062502

    2006

  23. [30]

    Gambier B., Sur les ´equations diff´erentielles du second ordre et du premeir degre dont l’int ´egrale g´en´erale est `a points critiques fix´es,Acta Math.,33(1910) 1–55. 51

    1910

  24. [31]

    and Satsuma J., Linearization and solutions of the discrete Painlev´e III equation,Phys

    Grammaticos B., Nijhoff F.W., Papageorgiou V., Ramani A. and Satsuma J., Linearization and solutions of the discrete Painlev´e III equation,Phys. Lett. A,185(1994) 446–452

    1994

  25. [32]

    and Papageorgiou V., Discrete dressing transformations and Painlev´e equations, Phys

    Grammaticos B., Ramani A. and Papageorgiou V., Discrete dressing transformations and Painlev´e equations, Phys. Lett. A,235(1997) 475–479

    1997

  26. [33]

    and Satsuma J., Strongly asymmetric dis- crete Painlev´e equations: The additive case,J

    Grammaticos B., Ramani A., Tamizhmani K.M., Tamizhmani T. and Satsuma J., Strongly asymmetric dis- crete Painlev´e equations: The additive case,J. Math. Phys.,55(2014) 053503

    2014

  27. [34]

    (Editor),CRM Ser

    Gromak V.I., B ¨acklund transformations of Painlev´e equations and their applications, in:The Painlev´ e Prop- erty, One Century Later, Conte R. (Editor),CRM Ser. Math. Phys., pp. 687–734, Springer-Verlag, New York (1999)

    1999

  28. [35]

    and Filipuk G., Functional relations between solutions of the fifth Painlev´e equation,Diff

    Gromak V.I. and Filipuk G., Functional relations between solutions of the fifth Painlev´e equation,Diff. Eqns, 37(2001) 586–591

    2001

  29. [36]

    and Filipuk G., The B ¨acklund transformations of the fifth Painlev´e equation and their applica- tions,Math

    Gromak V.I. and Filipuk G., The B ¨acklund transformations of the fifth Painlev´e equation and their applica- tions,Math. Model. Anal.,6(2001) 221–230

    2001

  30. [37]

    and Tsegel’nik V.V., Some properties of the B¨acklund transformations of the Painlev´e equations, Diff

    Gromak V.I. and Tsegel’nik V.V., Some properties of the B¨acklund transformations of the Painlev´e equations, Diff. Eqns.,32(1996) 1024–1029

    1996

  31. [38]

    and Shimomura S.,Painlev´ e Differential Equations in the Complex Plane,Studies in Math., vol.28, de Gruyter, Berlin, New York (2002)

    Gromak V.I., Laine I. and Shimomura S.,Painlev´ e Differential Equations in the Complex Plane,Studies in Math., vol.28, de Gruyter, Berlin, New York (2002)

    2002

  32. [39]

    Hisakado M., Unitary matrix models and Painlev ´e III,Mod. Phys. Lett.,A11(1996) 3001–3010

    1996

  33. [40]

    Hoppe J., Quantum states from minimal surfaces, arXiv:2502.18422

    arXiv

  34. [41]

    and Miwa T., Monodromy preserving deformations of linear ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients

    Jimbo M. and Miwa T., Monodromy preserving deformations of linear ordinary differential equations with rational coefficients. II,Physica,D2(1981) 407–448

    1981

  35. [42]

    and Nijhoff F.W

    Kajiwara K., The discrete Painlev ´e II equation and the classical special functions, in:Symmetries and inte- grability of difference equations, Clarkson P.A. and Nijhoff F.W. (Editors),London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser.,255, pp. 217–227, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    1999

  36. [43]

    and Tsuda T., Projective reduction of the discrete Painlev ´e system of type(A 2 + A1)(1),Int

    Kajiwara K., Nakazono N. and Tsuda T., Projective reduction of the discrete Painlev ´e system of type(A 2 + A1)(1),Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN(2011) 930–966

    2011

  37. [44]

    and Yamada Y., Geometric aspects of Painlev ´e equations,J

    Kajiwara K., Noumi M. and Yamada Y., Geometric aspects of Painlev ´e equations,J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 50(2017) 073001

    2017

  38. [45]

    and Ohta Y., Rational solutions for the discrete Painlev ´e II equation,Phys

    Kajiwara K., Yamamoto K. and Ohta Y., Rational solutions for the discrete Painlev ´e II equation,Phys. Lett. A,232(1997) 189–199

    1997

  39. [46]

    and McLeod J.B., Rational solutions of the fifth Painlev ´e equation,Diff

    Kitaev A.V., Law C.K. and McLeod J.B., Rational solutions of the fifth Painlev ´e equation,Diff. Int. Eqns.,7 (1994) 967–1000

    1994

  40. [47]

    Laguerre E., Sur la r ´eduction en fractions continues d’une fraction qui satisfait `a une ´equation diff´erentielle lin´eaire du premier ordre dont les coefficients sont rationnels,J. Math. Pures Appl.,1(1885) 135–165

  41. [48]

    Lund F., Example of a relativistic, completely integrable, Hamiltonian system,Phys. Rev. Lett.,38(1977) 1175–1178

    1977

  42. [49]

    and Regge T., Unified approach to strings and vortices with soliton solutions,Phys

    Lund F. and Regge T., Unified approach to strings and vortices with soliton solutions,Phys. Rev. D,14(1976) 1524–1535

    1976

  43. [50]

    Magnus A.P., Painlev ´e-type differential equations for the recurrence coefficients of semi-classical orthogonal polynomials,J. Comput. Appl. Math.,57(1995) 215–237

    1995

  44. [51]

    J.,56(2004) 467–490

    Masuda T., Classical transcendental solutions of the Painlev ´e equations and their degeneration,Tohoku Math. J.,56(2004) 467–490

    2004

  45. [52]

    Masuda T., Some properties of zeros of the Umemura polynomials of the fifth Painlev´e equation,Stud. Appl. Math.,155(2025) e70109

    2025

  46. [53]

    and Kajiwara K., A determinant formula for a class of rational solutions of Painlev ´e V equation,Nagoya Math

    Masuda T., Ohta Y. and Kajiwara K., A determinant formula for a class of rational solutions of Painlev ´e V equation,Nagoya Math. J.,168(2002) 1–25

    2002

  47. [54]

    and Fokas A.S., Schlesinger transformations of Painlev ´e II–V,J

    Mu ˘gan U. and Fokas A.S., Schlesinger transformations of Painlev ´e II–V,J. Math. Phys.,33(1992) 2031– 2045

    1992

  48. [55]

    and Papageorgiou V.G., Similarity reductions of integrable lattices and discrete analogues of the Painlev´e II equation,Phys

    Nijhoff F.W. and Papageorgiou V.G., Similarity reductions of integrable lattices and discrete analogues of the Painlev´e II equation,Phys. Lett. A,153(1991) 337–344

    1991

  49. [56]

    Noumi M.,Painlev´ e Equations through Symmetry, Trans. Math. Mono., vol.223, Amer. Math. Soc., Provi- dence, RI (2004)

    2004

  50. [57]

    and Yamada Y., Affine Weyl groups, discrete dynamical systems and Painlev´e equations,Commun

    Noumi M. and Yamada Y., Affine Weyl groups, discrete dynamical systems and Painlev´e equations,Commun. Math. Phys.,199(1998) 281–295

    1998

  51. [58]

    and Yamada Y., Umemura polynomials for the Painlev ´e V equation,Phys

    Noumi M. and Yamada Y., Umemura polynomials for the Painlev ´e V equation,Phys. Lett. A,247(1998) 65–69

    1998

  52. [59]

    and Yamada Y., Higher order Painlev´e equations of typeA(1) ℓ ,Funkcial

    Noumi M. and Yamada Y., Higher order Painlev´e equations of typeA(1) ℓ ,Funkcial. Ekvac.,41(1998) 483–503. 52

    1998

  53. [60]

    and Yamada Y., Symmetries in the fourth Painlev ´e equation and Okamoto polynomials,Nagoya Math

    Noumi M. and Yamada Y., Symmetries in the fourth Painlev ´e equation and Okamoto polynomials,Nagoya Math. J.,153(1999) 53–86

    1999

  54. [61]

    and Yamada Y., Symmetries in Painlev´e equations,Sugaku Expositions,17(2004) 203–218

    Noumi M. and Yamada Y., Symmetries in Painlev´e equations,Sugaku Expositions,17(2004) 203–218

    2004

  55. [62]

    and McClain M.A

    Olver F.W.J., Olde Daalhuis A.B., Lozier D.W., Schneider B.I., Boisvert R.F., Clark C.W., Miller B.R., Saun- ders B.V., Cohl H.S. and McClain M.A. (Editors),NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, Release 1.2.5 (December 15, 2025) http://dlmf.nist.gov/

    2025

  56. [63]

    Painlev´e,Japan

    Okamoto K., Sur les feuilletages associ ´es aux ´equations du second ordre `a points critiques fixes de P. Painlev´e,Japan. J. Math. (N.S.),5(1979) 1–79

    1979

  57. [64]

    Second and fourth Painlev´e equations, PII and PIV,Math

    Okamoto K., Studies on the Painlev´e equations III. Second and fourth Painlev´e equations, PII and PIV,Math. Ann.,275(1986) 221–255

    1986

  58. [65]

    Okamoto K., Studies on the Painlev ´e equations. II. Fifth Painlev ´e equation P V,Japan. J. Math.,13(1987) 47–76

    1987

  59. [66]

    Sixth Painlev ´e equation P VI,Ann

    Okamoto K., Studies on the Painlev ´e equations I. Sixth Painlev ´e equation P VI,Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.,146 (1987) 337–381

    1987

  60. [67]

    Third Painlev´e equation PIII,Funkcial

    Okamoto K., Studies on the Painlev ´e equations IV. Third Painlev´e equation PIII,Funkcial. Ekvac,30(1987) 305–332

    1987

  61. [68]

    and Shevitz D., Unitary-matrix models as exactly solvable string theories,Phys

    Periwal V. and Shevitz D., Unitary-matrix models as exactly solvable string theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.,64 (1990) 1326–1329

    1990

  62. [69]

    Pohlmeyer K., Integrable Hamiltonian systems and interactions through quadratic constraints,Commun. Math. Phys.,46(1976) 207–221

    1976

  63. [70]

    and Grammaticos B., Discrete Painlev ´e equations: coalescence, limits and degeneracies,Physica A,228(1996) 160–171

    Ramani A. and Grammaticos B., Discrete Painlev ´e equations: coalescence, limits and degeneracies,Physica A,228(1996) 160–171

    1996

  64. [71]

    and Grammaticos B., Discrete integrable systems from continuous Painlev ´e equations through limiting procedures,Nonlinearity,13(2000) 1073–1085

    Ramani A., Ohta Y. and Grammaticos B., Discrete integrable systems from continuous Painlev ´e equations through limiting procedures,Nonlinearity,13(2000) 1073–1085

    2000

  65. [72]

    and Grammaticos B., Self-duality and Schlesinger chains for the asymmetric d-PII andq-PIII equations,Commun

    Ramani A., Ohta Y., Satsuma J. and Grammaticos B., Self-duality and Schlesinger chains for the asymmetric d-PII andq-PIII equations,Commun. Math. Phys.,192(1998) 67–76

    1998

  66. [73]

    Sakai H., Rational surfaces associated with affine root systems and geometry of the Painlev ´e equations, Comm. Math. Phys.,220(2001) 165–229

    2001

  67. [74]

    and Ramani A., Bilinear discrete Painlev ´e-II and its particular solutions,J

    Satsuma J., Kajiwara K., Grammaticos B., Hietarinta J. and Ramani A., Bilinear discrete Painlev ´e-II and its particular solutions,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.,28(1995) 3541–3548

    1995

  68. [75]

    J.,5(1939) 401–417

    Shohat J., A differential equation for orthogonal polynomials,Duke Math. J.,5(1939) 401–417

    1939

  69. [76]

    Teodorescu R., Generic critical points of normal matrix ensembles,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.,39(2006) 8921– 8932

    2006

  70. [77]

    and Wiegmann P., Normal random matrix ensemble as a growth problem,Nuclear Phys

    Teodorescu R., Bettelheim E., Agam O., Zabrodin A. and Wiegmann P., Normal random matrix ensemble as a growth problem,Nuclear Phys. B,704(2005) 407–444

    2005

  71. [79]

    Umemura H., Special polynomials associated with the Painlev ´e equations I,Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6),29(2020) 1063–1089

    2020

  72. [80]

    Van Assche W.,Orthogonal Polynomials and Painlev´ e Equations, Australian Mathematical Society Lecture Series, vol.27, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2018)

    2018

  73. [81]

    and Koepf K

    Van Assche W., Orthogonal and multiple orthogonal polynomials, random matrices, and Painlev´e equations, in:Orthogonal polynomials, Foupouagnigni M. and Koepf K. (Editors),Tutor. Sch. Workshops Math. Sci., pp. 629–683, Birkh¨auser/Springer, Cham (2020)

    2020

  74. [82]

    Wadati M., Transformation theories for nonlinear discrete systems,Supp. Prog. Theo. Phys.,59(1976) 36–63

    1976

  75. [83]

    and Zabrodin A., Conformal maps and integrable hierarchies,Commun

    Wiegmann P.B. and Zabrodin A., Conformal maps and integrable hierarchies,Commun. Math. Phys.,213 (2000) 523–538

    2000

  76. [84]

    Yamada Y., Special polynomials and generalized Painlev ´e equations, in:Combinatorial Methods in Repre- sentation Theory, Koike K.et al.(Editors),Adv. Stud. Pure Math.,28, pp. 391–400, Kinokuniya, Tokyo, Japan (2000)

    2000

  77. [85]

    Yamilov R., Symmetries as integrability criteria for differential difference equations,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 39(2006) R541–R623. 53

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.