Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 80 references

FGAA-FPN: Foreground-Guided Angle-Aware Feature Pyramid Network for Oriented Object Detection

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read FGAA-FPN claims to reach 75.5% mAP on DOTA v1.0 and 68.3% on DOTA v1.5 by adding foreground-guided modulation and angle-aware attention to a feature pyramid for oriented object detection.

desk verdict A plausible incremental neck design whose headline SOTA claim is contradicted by its own Table 1 and whose remaining evidence is neither multi-seed nor released. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.10710 v2 pith:UISF7A5O submitted 2026-02-11 cs.CV

Jialin Ma This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords orientedobjectdetectionfeaturepyramidnetworkforeground-guidedmodulationangle-awareattentionDOTAdatasetremotesensingimagerymulti-scalefeaturesweaksupervision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes a redesign of the feature pyramid network for oriented object detection in aerial imagery, arguing that pyramid levels have complementary functional roles: fine levels need background suppression, coarse levels need orientation-preserving interaction. It introduces two modules — a Foreground-Guided Feature Modulation (FGFM) applied at high-resolution levels, and an Angle-Aware Multi-Head Attention (AAMHA) applied at low-resolution levels — and combines them in a single FGAA-FPN. On DOTA benchmarks with a ResNet-50 backbone and Oriented R-CNN detector, this raises mAP50 on DOTA v1.5 from 64.4 (baseline FPN) to 68.3, and reaches 75.5 on DOTA v1.0. The ablations show each module contributes independently, and generalization experiments show consistent gains across five different detection heads, suggesting the design principle is not tied to one architecture.

What carries the argument

Two complementary modules. FGFM predicts a per-pixel foreground probability map directly from the feature map, calibrates it via learnable sharpness/bias/strength parameters, generates channel-wise modulation weights by concatenating the calibrated map with the input, and applies residual scaling Fi ⊙ (1 + α M′). AAMHA applies multi-head self-attention where each head h has a learnable 2D orientation vector w_h; for every token pair (p,q), it computes the normalized relative direction u_pq = (c_p − c_q)/(‖c_p − c_q‖ + ε) and adds an orientation bias B_ori_h(p,q) = w_hᵀ u_pq to the attention logits with scale γ. A foreground bias B_fg(p,q) = m_p(2m_q − 1) using the FGFM map is added with scal

What would settle it

An ablation that replaces the orientation vector w_h with fixed random directions that are independent of coordinates, while keeping the same parameter count and tuning γ on the validation set; if DOTA v1.5 mAP50 stays near 68.0–68.3, the directional encoding is not the operative factor. Alternatively, evaluate FGAA-FPN on images rotated by 90° at test time: a genuine orientation-aware mechanism should lose accuracy relative to the FPN baseline when the learned orientation priors no longer match the data.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that explicitly allocating different mechanisms to different pyramid levels—foreground suppression at fine, high-resolution levels and angle-aware global interaction at coarse, semantic levels—improves oriented object detection compared with the uniform fusion of a standard FPN. Internally supported, the paper shows that under the same Oriented R-CNN (ResNet-50) setup, replacing FPN with FGAA-FPN raises DOTA v1.5 mAP50 from 64.4% to 68.3% and mAP75 from 41.7% to 44.1%, with FGFM alone contributing +2.7 mAP50 and AAMHA alone +1.9 mAP50. The same neck also produces consistent gains when plugged into Rotated Faster R-CNN, RoI Transformer, Gliding Vertex, Rotated RetinaN

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the normalized coordinate difference between two feature-grid locations is a valid encoding of their object-orientation relationship, and that a single learned 2D vector per attention head is enough to exploit it; if raw pixel direction does not correspond to the object-relative orientation needed for regression, the angle-aware gains in the ablations could be artifacts of tuning γ and β on the same benchmark.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Replacing a standard FPN with FGAA-FPN under Oriented R-CNN raises DOTA v1.5 mAP50 from 64.4% to 68.3% and mAP75 from 41.7% to 44.1%, with the two modules providing complementary gains.
  • The design is not head-specific: using FGAA-FPN as the neck in Rotated Faster R-CNN, RoI Transformer, Gliding Vertex, and Rotated RetinaNet improves mAP by 1.5, 0.3, 1.2, and 0.7 points respectively (Oriented R-CNN: +2.8).
  • High-level placement of AAMHA (P5–P7) is cost-effective: it achieves 66.3 mAP with 3.61M parameters and 60.88 GFLOPs, versus 66.5 mAP with 4.37M parameters and 80.94 GFLOPs when applied to all levels.
  • Within AAMHA, the orientation bias is the primary driver: enabling it alone adds 1.8 mAP50 on DOTA v1.5, while the foreground mask bias alone adds 1.0; combining them reaches 68.3.
  • On DOTA v1.0, FGAA-FPN reaches 75.5 mAP50, outperforming compared necks with the same ResNet-50 backbone, with notable gains on Small vehicle (77.2) and Harbor (65.1).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The orientation bias uses raw pixel-grid coordinates, so it implicitly encodes image-frame direction rather than object-relative direction; if the dataset has a canonical orientation (e.g., ships aligned to coastlines), part of the gain could come from learning dataset-specific directional priors rather than true orientational generalization. A test: apply random 90°/180° rotations to test images
  • The hierarchy-aware principle could be extended to a learned router that assigns per-level whether to apply foreground suppression, orientation attention, both, or neither; the fixed placement (FGFM on P3–P5, AAMHA on P5–P7) may not be optimal for datasets with different scale distributions.
  • Because foreground supervision is generated by projecting oriented box interiors onto feature maps, the masks are coarse; combining FGFM with pixel-wise segmentation labels where available might sharpen the foreground prior and further suppress false positives in heavily cluttered scenes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes FGAA-FPN, a feature-pyramid neck for oriented object detection that combines Foreground-Guided Feature Modulation (FGFM) on lower pyramid levels (P3–P5) with Angle-Aware Multi-Head Attention (AAMHA) on higher levels (P5–P7), integrated into the Oriented R-CNN detector. The authors report 75.5 mAP on DOTA v1.0 and 68.3 mAP on DOTA v1.5, and claim state-of-the-art results. The core evidence is the controlled neck-replacement comparison in Table 2, the component ablations in Tables 3–5, and a generalization experiment across detectors in Figure 4.

Significance. If the controlled neck-replacement results were statistically robust, the two modules would constitute a modest but potentially useful contribution: FGFM adds weakly supervised foreground saliency to low-level features, and AAMHA injects an explicit directional bias into self-attention. The paper's strength is the controlled neck-only comparison on DOTA v1.5 and the placement/cost analysis in Tables 3–5. However, the headline SOTA claim is contradicted by the paper's own Table 1, the controlled experiments lack error bars and multiple runs, and the bias hyperparameters are selected and evaluated on the same benchmark. As submitted, the evidence does not support the advertised claims; the defensible contribution is narrower and needs stronger validation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; §4.2.1, Table 1] The abstract's claim of 'state-of-the-art results, reaching 75.5%' and §4.2.1's claim of 'the best overall performance on the DOTA v1.0 dataset' are directly contradicted by the paper's own Table 1. AO2-DETR, with the same ResNet-50 backbone, reports 77.7 mAP50, 2.2 points above FGAA-FPN's 75.5. Since the table header is explicitly mAP50, this is an apples-to-apples comparison. The central empirical claim is false as stated; at minimum it must be narrowed to 'improves over the FPN baseline under Oriented R-CNN' or 'competitive among two-stage FPN-based detectors.'
  2. [§4.3.3, Table 5; §4.3.1; Table 2] The orientation-bias and mask-bias scales γ=0.7 and β=0.6 are selected through ablations on DOTA v1.5 (§4.3.3, Table 5) and then used in the final reported DOTA v1.5 result (68.3 mAP50, Table 2/Table 3). No separate validation split, multiple seeds, or error bars are reported. If model selection and final evaluation use the same split/benchmark, the gains may be selection artifacts. This is load-bearing because the claimed DOTA v1.5 improvement over BVAMFPN is only 0.9 points, smaller than typical run-to-run variation in this setting. Please report mean±std over at least three runs, specify the exact train/val/test protocol, and fix γ, β a priori or select them on a disjoint validation set.
  3. [§3.3.2, Eqs. (15)–(16)] The key premise that normalized coordinate differences between arbitrary feature-grid tokens encode 'relative orientation relationships' is not established. Because u_pq is the pixel-space direction between tokens, w_h^T u_pq is effectively a linear positional-encoding term; it does not depend on the oriented object's angle. To support the 'angle-aware' attribution of the gains in Tables 3 and 5, the paper should include controls such as (a) fixed random w_h, (b) a per-head learnable scalar with no directional structure, or (c) a standard relative-position bias. Without such controls, the mechanism claim is not strongly supported, although this concern is secondary to the SOTA contradiction.
  4. [§4.3.4, Fig. 4] The generalization experiment is difficult to evaluate as presented. The text states improvements of 1.5%, 0.3%, 1.2%, 0.7%, and 2.8% mAP for Rotated Faster R-CNN, RoI Transformer, Gliding Vertex, Rotated RetinaNet, and Oriented R-CNN, respectively, but the bar values in Fig. 4 imply different gaps (e.g., Rotated Faster R-CNN 64.58→65.58 is 1.0, not 1.5). No details are given about training schedules, epochs, or whether the same hyperparameters were used across detectors. Please correct the numbers and provide a table with exact values and standard deviations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.1.3; Tables 1–5; Abstract] The mAP notation is inconsistent. Section 4.1.3 defines mAP as the mean over multiple IoU thresholds, but all tables report 'mAP50'. The abstract also reports 75.5% and 68.3% as 'mAP'. Please use consistent notation and state explicitly that the headline numbers are mAP50 unless a multi-IoU mAP is actually computed.
  2. [§3.3.3 vs §4.3.1] The description of the mask-bias placement is inconsistent. Section 3.3.3 broadcasts B_fg to all heads, while §4.3.1 states 'the mask bias is additionally enabled only at P5' in the full FGAA-FPN setting. Please clarify whether β applies at P5 only or at all AAMHA levels, and update the architecture description and Figure 3 accordingly.
  3. [§3.4; Eq. (6); Eq. (11)] Several implementation details needed for reproducibility are missing: the values of the foreground-loss balancing factor λ_fg and Dice weight λ_d, the initialization/ranges for the learnable scalars k, b, λ in Eq. (6), and the scaling factor α in Eq. (11). Please report these hyperparameters explicitly.
  4. [§4.2.2, Table 2] In DOTA v1.5, the 'container crane' (CC) category has very low AP (12.3–17.3) across all methods, including FGAA-FPN. A brief discussion of whether the proposed foreground or angle-aware modules particularly help or harm rare categories would improve the analysis.
  5. [Figure 4] The figure is visually crowded and the bar labels are difficult to read. Also, 'RoiTransformer' and 'RoITransformer' are used inconsistently across text, figures, and references. Please standardize.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: empirical architecture evaluation on external benchmarks; no derivation reduces to its inputs.

full rationale

FGAA-FPN is an empirical architecture paper: it proposes two modules (FGFM and AAMHA) and evaluates them on the external DOTA v1.0/v1.5 benchmarks. There is no claimed first-principles derivation whose conclusion is equivalent to its assumptions. FGFM learns a foreground map supervised by ground-truth oriented boxes; the detection loss uses the same annotations, but this is standard weak supervision, the foreground branch is detached from detection gradients, and the auxiliary loss does not make the final mAP a fitted quantity. AAMHA's orientation bias (Eqs. 15-17) is constructed from normalized coordinate differences and learnable per-head vectors; it does not encode or predict the reported accuracy. No parameter is fitted to the headline mAP and then renamed a prediction. The paper contains no self-citations by the single author, and the references to Shen et al. are unrelated prior work, not load-bearing self-support. The main legitimate criticism is an internal consistency problem—Table 1 lists AO2-DETR at 77.7 while the text claims FGAA-FPN reaches the 'best overall performance' with 75.5—but that is an overclaim/correctness issue, not circularity. Likewise, tuning γ and β via ablations on DOTA v1.5 and then reporting the same benchmark result is a mild overfitting risk, not a definitional or statistical circularity. The comparisons are externally grounded, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; FGFM and AAMHA are architectural modules. The empirical result depends on several hand-set or learnable scalars (gamma, beta, k, b, lambda, alpha, loss weights), and the paper provides no code or weights, so the central claim is sensitive to tuning choices that are only partially reported.

free parameters (5)
  • FCC learnable scalars k, b, lambda = not reported
    Eq. 6: sharpness, bias, and modulation strength of foreground calibration; learned during training, values not listed in the paper.
  • orientation-bias scale gamma = 0.7
    Set after ablations on DOTA v1.5 (Section 4.3.3, Table 5); directly scales the angle-aware term in attention logits.
  • foreground-bias scale beta = 0.6
    Enabled only at P5 in the full model (Section 4.3.1); value chosen from ablation on the same benchmark.
  • residual modulation scaling alpha = not specified
    Eq. 11: 'learnable or predefined scaling factor'; exact setting is absent.
  • foreground-loss weights lambda_d and lambda_fg = not reported
    Eqs. 25-26: Dice-weight and overall foreground-loss balance; no numerical values are given.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Pixels inside ground-truth oriented boxes are a faithful foreground label at every pyramid level.
    Section 3.4 constructs M^gt_i from OBB interiors; FGFM is supervised entirely by this proxy, with no handling of label noise or boundary ambiguity.
  • domain assumption Normalized coordinate differences between spatial tokens encode orientation relationships relevant to detection.
    Eq. 15 defines u_pq; Eq. 16 injects w_h^T u_pq as an orientation prior without evidence linking pixel direction to object orientation.
  • domain assumption Lower pyramid levels are clutter-dominated and higher levels semantically stable, so FGFM on P3-P5 and AAMHA on P5-P7 is the correct division.
    Section 3.1 motivates the hierarchical split; Table 4 confirms it post hoc on the same benchmark used for the final result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of FGAA-FPN: Foreground-Guided Angle-Aware Feature Pyramid Network for Oriented Object Detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UISF7A5O

@misc{pith2026260210710,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: FGAA-FPN: Foreground-Guided Angle-Aware Feature Pyramid Network for Oriented Object Detection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UISF7A5O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.10710}
}
read the original abstract

With the increasing availability of high-resolution remote sensing and aerial imagery, oriented object detection has become a key capability for geographic information updating, maritime surveillance, and disaster response. However, it remains challenging due to cluttered backgrounds, severe scale variation, and large orientation changes. Existing approaches largely improve performance through multi-scale feature fusion with feature pyramid networks or contextual modeling with attention, but they often lack explicit foreground modeling and do not leverage geometric orientation priors, which limits feature discriminability. To overcome these limitations, we propose FGAA-FPN, a Foreground-Guided Angle-Aware Feature Pyramid Network for oriented object detection. FGAA-FPN is built on a hierarchical functional decomposition that accounts for the distinct spatial resolution and semantic abstraction across pyramid levels, thereby strengthening multi-scale representations. Concretely, a Foreground-Guided Feature Modulation module learns foreground saliency under weak supervision to enhance object regions and suppress background interference in low-level features. In parallel, an Angle-Aware Multi-Head Attention module encodes relative orientation relationships to guide global interactions among high-level semantic features. Extensive experiments on DOTA v1.0 and DOTA v1.5 demonstrate that FGAA-FPN achieves state-of-the-art results, reaching 75.5% and 68.3% mAP, respectively.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 2 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine11(4), 8–44 (2023)

    Zhang, X., Zhang, T., Wang, G., Zhu, P., Tang, X., Jia, X., Jiao, L.: Remote sensing object detection meets deep learning: A metareview of challenges and advances. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine11(4), 8–44 (2023)

    2023

  2. [2]

    Ieee Access8, 126385–126400 (2020)

    Khelifi, L., Mignotte, M.: Deep learning for change detection in remote sensing images: Comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Ieee Access8, 126385–126400 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Xie, X., Cheng, G., Wang, J., Yao, X., Han, J.: Oriented r-cnn for object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 3520–3529 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Lin, T.-Y., Doll´ ar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., Belongie, S.: Feature pyramid networks for object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2117–2125 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Liu, S., Qi, L., Qin, H., Shi, J., Jia, J.: Path aggregation network for instance 20 segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8759–8768 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Guo, C., Fan, B., Zhang, Q., Xiang, S., Pan, C.: Augfpn: Improving multi- scale feature learning for object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 12595–12604 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Ghiasi, G., Lin, T.-Y., Le, Q.V.: Nas-fpn: Learning scalable feature pyramid archi- tecture for object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7036–7045 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp

    Gong, Y., Yu, X., Ding, Y., Peng, X., Zhao, J., Han, Z.: Effective fusion fac- tor in fpn for tiny object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp. 1160–1168 (2021)

    2021

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    IEEE Access12, 8619–8632 (2024)

    Du, Z., Liang, Y.: Object detection of remote sensing image based on multi-scale feature fusion and attention mechanism. IEEE Access12, 8619–8632 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    The Visual Computer39(7), 2969–2980 (2023)

    Wang, G., Gan, X., Cao, Q., Zhai, Q.: Mfanet: multi-scale feature fusion network with attention mechanism. The Visual Computer39(7), 2969–2980 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems36(4), 6925–6939 (2024)

    Han, H., Zhang, Q., Li, F., Du, Y.: Foreground capture feature pyramid network- oriented object detection in complex backgrounds. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems36(4), 6925–6939 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Neural Networks155, 439–450 (2022)

    Min, K., Lee, G.-H., Lee, S.-W.: Attentional feature pyramid network for small object detection. Neural Networks155, 439–450 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Ding, J., Xue, N., Long, Y., Xia, G.-S., Lu, Q.: Learning roi transformer for oriented object detection in aerial images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2849–2858 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Han, J., Ding, J., Xue, N., Xia, G.-S.: Redet: A rotation-equivariant detector for aerial object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2786–2795 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Qin, Z., Zhang, P., Wu, F., Li, X.: Fcanet: Frequency channel attention networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 783–792 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics20(8), 9939–9951 (2024)

    Fu, R., Chen, C., Yan, S., Zhang, R., Wang, X., Chen, H.: Fadl-net: Frequency- assisted dynamic learning network for oriented object detection in remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics20(8), 9939–9951 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Advances in neural information processing systems37, 6246– 6266 (2024)

    Shen, F., Tang, J.: Imagpose: A unified conditional framework for pose-guided 21 person generation. Advances in neural information processing systems37, 6246– 6266 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    In: The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (2024)

    Shen, F., Ye, H., Zhang, J., Wang, C., Han, X., Wei, Y.: Advancing pose- guided image synthesis with progressive conditional diffusion models. In: The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (2024). https://openreview.net/forum?id=rHzapPnCgT

    2024

  11. [19]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

    Shen, F., Ye, H., Liu, S., Zhang, J., Wang, C., Han, X., Wei, Y.: Boosting con- sistency in story visualization with rich-contextual conditional diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, pp. 6785–6794 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

    Shen, F., Jiang, X., He, X., Ye, H., Wang, C., Du, X., Li, Z., Tang, J.: Imagdressing-v1: Customizable virtual dressing. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, pp. 6795–6804 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Xia, G.-S., Bai, X., Ding, J., Zhu, Z., Belongie, S., Luo, J., Datcu, M., Pelillo, M., Zhang, L.: Dota: A large-scale dataset for object detection in aerial images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3974–3983 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence45(4), 4932–4944 (2022)

    Nie, G., Huang, H.: Multi-oriented object detection in aerial images with dou- ble horizontal rectangles. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence45(4), 4932–4944 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Xu, C., Ding, J., Wang, J., Yang, W., Yu, H., Yu, L., Xia, G.-S.: Dynamic coarse-to-fine learning for oriented tiny object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7318–7328 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Computers & Geosciences 103, 1–11 (2017)

    C´ anovas-Garc ´ ıa, F., Alonso-Sarr ´ ıa, F., Gomariz-Castillo, F., O˜ nate-Valdivieso, F.: Modification of the random forest algorithm to avoid statistical dependence problems when classifying remote sensing imagery. Computers & Geosciences 103, 1–11 (2017)

    2017

  17. [25]

    ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing145, 3–22 (2018)

    Deng, Z., Sun, H., Zhou, S., Zhao, J., Lei, L., Zou, H.: Multi-scale object detection in remote sensing imagery with convolutional neural networks. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing145, 3–22 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing57(8), 5535–5548 (2019)

    Zhang, Y., Yuan, Y., Feng, Y., Lu, X.: Hierarchical and robust convolutional neural network for very high-resolution remote sensing object detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing57(8), 5535–5548 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing60, 1–18 (2021) 22

    Wang, G., Zhuang, Y., Chen, H., Liu, X., Zhang, T., Li, L., Dong, S., Sang, Q.: Fsod-net: Full-scale object detection from optical remote sensing imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing60, 1–18 (2021) 22

    2021

  20. [28]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing58(3), 2104–2114 (2019)

    Dong, Z., Wang, M., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Zhang, Z.: Object detection in high resolution remote sensing imagery based on convolutional neural networks with suitable object scale features. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing58(3), 2104–2114 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    li et al

    Li, Y., Li, X., Dai, Y., Hou, Q., Liu, L., Liu, Y., Cheng, M.-M., Yang, J.: Lsknet: A foundation lightweight backbone for remote sensing: Y. li et al. International Journal of Computer Vision133(3), 1410–1431 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Cai, X., Lai, Q., Wang, Y., Wang, W., Sun, Z., Yao, Y.: Poly kernel inception net- work for remote sensing detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 27706–27716 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp

    Chen, J., Mai, H., Luo, L., Chen, X., Wu, K.: Effective feature fusion network in bifpn for small object detection. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 699–703 (2021). IEEE

    2021

  24. [32]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2025)

    Ren, D., Liu, Y., Sun, H., Zhang, L., Wan, J.: Hierarchical heterogeneous geo- metric foreground perception network for remote sensing object detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (2025)

    2025

  25. [33]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

    Shi, Z., Hu, J., Ren, J., Ye, H., Yuan, X., Ouyang, Y., He, J., Ji, B., Guo, J.: Hs-fpn: High frequency and spatial perception fpn for tiny object detection. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, pp. 6896– 6904 (2025)

    2025

  26. [34]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing54(12), 7018–7031 (2016)

    Chang, Y., Yan, L., Wu, T., Zhong, S.: Remote sensing image stripe noise removal: From image decomposition perspective. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing54(12), 7018–7031 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Remote Sensing15(8), 1971 (2023)

    Niu, R., Zhi, X., Jiang, S., Gong, J., Zhang, W., Yu, L.: Aircraft target detection in low signal-to-noise ratio visible remote sensing images. Remote Sensing15(8), 1971 (2023)

    1971

  28. [36]

    In: 2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp

    Ma, X., Dong, J., Wei, W., Zheng, B., Ma, J., Zhou, T.: Remote sensing image object detection by fusing multi-scale contextual features and channel enhance- ment. In: 2023 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 01–07 (2023). IEEE

    2023

  29. [37]

    Remote Sensing14(3), 579 (2022)

    Zhang, K., Shen, H.: Multi-stage feature enhancement pyramid network for detecting objects in optical remote sensing images. Remote Sensing14(3), 579 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 17, 1257–1268 (2023) 23

    Jiang, H., Qian, Y., Yang, G., Liu, H.: Mlknet: Multi-stage for remote sensing image spatiotemporal fusion network based on a large kernel attention. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 17, 1257–1268 (2023) 23

    2023

  31. [39]

    IEEE Sensors Journal (2025)

    Wang, Z., Tian, H., Yang, W., Xu, Z., Chen, W., Li, Y., Xu, T., Liu, J., Wang, Z.: Foreground attention loss and attention-guided convolution for remote sensing object detection. IEEE Sensors Journal (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    In: 2023 3rd International Conference on Computer Science, Electronic Information Engineering and Intelligent Control Technology (CEI), pp

    Xu, Z.-l., Tang, W., Wu, P.-f.: Aerial object detection in complex scenes based on mask guidance. In: 2023 3rd International Conference on Computer Science, Electronic Information Engineering and Intelligent Control Technology (CEI), pp. 505–510 (2023). IEEE

    2023

  33. [41]

    Remote Sensing17(21), 3581 (2025)

    Xu, Y., Ji, H.: Contextual-semantic interactive perception network for small object detection in uav aerial images. Remote Sensing17(21), 3581 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.10040 (2025)

    Lu, W., Chen, S.-B., Ding, C.H., Tang, J., Luo, B.: Lwganet: A lightweight group attention backbone for remote sensing visual tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.10040 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (2025)

    Yang, D., Wu, F., Qu, G., Liu, Y., Cheng, Y., Aramayo, A., Zheng, Z., Yang, Z.: Lgm-det: A lightweight geometry-aware multi-scale detector for oriented ship target detection in sar images. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Symmetry17(8), 1251 (2025)

    Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Xiong, Z., Zhang, Y., Xu, X.: Soam block: A scale– orientation-aware module for efficient object detection in remote sensing imagery. Symmetry17(8), 1251 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Applied Sciences15(10), 5240 (2025)

    Hu, Z., Meng, X., Liu, X., Sun, Z.: Rotation-invariant feature enhancement with dual-aspect loss for arbitrary-oriented object detection in remote sensing. Applied Sciences15(10), 5240 (2025)

    2025

  38. [46]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing16, 7791–7803 (2023)

    Zhu, Y., Lv, K., Yu, Y., Xu, W.: Edge-guided parallel network for vhr remote sensing image change detection. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing16, 7791–7803 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing60, 1–12 (2022)

    Wu, Y., Zhang, K., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Wang, Q., Li, X.: Gcwnet: A global context-weaving network for object detection in remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing60, 1–12 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    In: AOPC 2020: Optical Sensing and Imaging Technology, vol

    Min, L., Gao, K., Wang, H., Wang, J., Yu, P., Li, T., Chen, Z.: Remote sensing image scene classification using deep combinative feature learning. In: AOPC 2020: Optical Sensing and Imaging Technology, vol. 11567, pp. 646–652 (2020). SPIE

    2020

  41. [49]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology32(11), 7869–7879 (2022)

    Qian, W., Yang, X., Peng, S., Zhang, X., Yan, J.: Rsdet++: Point-based mod- ulated loss for more accurate rotated object detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology32(11), 7869–7879 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    AI Communications37(1), 169– 183 (2024)

    Gan, L., Tan, X., Hu, L.: Gws: Rotation object detection in aerial remote sensing 24 images based on gauss–wasserstein scattering. AI Communications37(1), 169– 183 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 62, 1–16 (2024)

    Zhou, Z., Zhu, Y.: Kldet: Detecting tiny objects in remote sensing images via kullback–leibler divergence. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 62, 1–16 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01186 (2025)

    Shen, F., Xu, W., Yan, R., Zhang, D., Shu, X., Tang, J.: Imagedit: Let any subject transform. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.01186 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01949 (2025)

    Shen, F., Du, X., Gao, Y., Yu, J., Cao, Y., Lei, X., Tang, J.: Imagharmony: Con- trollable image editing with consistent object quantity and layout. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01949 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13176 (2025)

    Shen, F., Yu, J., Wang, C., Jiang, X., Du, X., Tang, J.: Imaggarment-1: Fine-grained garment generation for controllable fashion design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13176 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  47. [55]

    In: Forty- second International Conference on Machine Learning

    Shen, F., Wang, C., Gao, J., Guo, Q., Dang, J., Tang, J., Chua, T.-S.: Long-term talkingface generation via motion-prior conditional diffusion model. In: Forty- second International Conference on Machine Learning

  48. [56]

    Ruby, U., Yendapalli, V., et al.: Binary cross entropy with deep learning technique for image classification. Int. J. Adv. Trends Comput. Sci. Eng9(10) (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp

    Li, X., Sun, X., Meng, Y., Liang, J., Wu, F., Li, J.: Dice loss for data-imbalanced nlp tasks. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 465–476 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Lin, T.-Y., Goyal, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Doll´ ar, P.: Focal loss for dense object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2980–2988 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    In: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, pp

    Zheng, G., Zhang, F., Zheng, Z., Xiang, Y., Yuan, N.J., Xie, X., Li, Z.: Drn: A deep reinforcement learning framework for news recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, pp. 167–176 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Chen, Z., Chen, K., Lin, W., See, J., Yu, H., Ke, Y., Yang, C.: Piou loss: Towards accurate oriented object detection in complex environments. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 195–211 (2020). Springer

    2020

  53. [61]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

    Ming, Q., Zhou, Z., Miao, L., Zhang, H., Li, L.: Dynamic anchor learning for arbitrary-oriented object detection. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, pp. 2355–2363 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on 25 Computer Vision, pp

    Yang, F., Fan, H., Chu, P., Blasch, E., Ling, H.: Clustered object detection in aerial images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on 25 Computer Vision, pp. 8311–8320 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

    Yang, X., Yan, J., Feng, Z., He, T.: R3det: Refined single-stage detector with feature refinement for rotating object. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, pp. 3163–3171 (2021)

    2021

  56. [64]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Yang, X., Hou, L., Zhou, Y., Wang, W., Yan, J.: Dense label encoding for boundary discontinuity free rotation detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 15819–15829 (2021)

    2021

  57. [65]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp

    Yang, X., Yan, J., Ming, Q., Wang, W., Zhang, X., Tian, Q.: Rethinking rotated object detection with gaussian wasserstein distance loss. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 11830–11841 (2021). PMLR

    2021

  58. [66]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology33(5), 2342–2356 (2022)

    Dai, L., Liu, H., Tang, H., Wu, Z., Song, P.: Ao2-detr: Arbitrary-oriented object detection transformer. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology33(5), 2342–2356 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence39(6), 1137–1149 (2016)

    Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., Sun, J.: Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence39(6), 1137–1149 (2016)

    2016

  60. [68]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Cai, Z., Vasconcelos, N.: Cascade r-cnn: Delving into high quality object detec- tion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 6154–6162 (2018)

    2018

  61. [69]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Yang, X., Yang, J., Yan, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, T., Guo, Z., Sun, X., Fu, K.: Scrdet: Towards more robust detection for small, cluttered and rotated objects. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 8232–8241 (2019)

    2019

  62. [70]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence43(4), 1452–1459 (2020)

    Xu, Y., Fu, M., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Chen, K., Xia, G.-S., Bai, X.: Glid- ing vertex on the horizontal bounding box for multi-oriented object detection. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence43(4), 1452–1459 (2020)

    2020

  63. [71]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

    Guo, Z., Liu, C., Zhang, X., Jiao, J., Ji, X., Ye, Q.: Beyond bounding-box: Convex-hull feature adaptation for oriented and densely packed object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8792–8801 (2021)

    2021

  64. [72]

    IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing62, 1–15 (2024)

    Zeng, Y., Chen, Y., Yang, X., Li, Q., Yan, J.: Ars-detr: Aspect ratio-sensitive detection transformer for aerial oriented object detection. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing62, 1–15 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Huang, Z., Feng, Y., Liu, Q., Wang, Y.: Mutdet: Mutually optimizing pre-training 26 for remote sensing object detection. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1–17 (2024). Springer

    2024

  66. [74]

    IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing62, 1–15 (2024)

    Ming, Q., Miao, L., Zhou, Z., Song, J., Pizurica, A.: Gradient calibration loss for fast and accurate oriented bounding box regression. IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing62, 1–15 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    In: 2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp

    Li, H., Zhang, R., Pan, Y., Ren, J., Shen, F.: Lr-fpn: Enhancing remote sens- ing object detection with location refined feature pyramid network. In: 2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1–8 (2024). IEEE

    2024

  68. [76]

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems34(4), 1958–1971 (2021)

    Liu, H., Ma, S., Xia, D., Li, S.: Sfanet: A spectrum-aware feature augmentation network for visible-infrared person reidentification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems34(4), 1958–1971 (2021)

    1958

  69. [77]

    Journal of Real-Time Image Processing23(1), 26 (2026)

    Wang, Z., Yang, J., Qiao, Y., Zhang, W.: Bvamfpn: multi-scale feature fusion for rotated object detection in remote sensing based on biological visual attention mechanism. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing23(1), 26 (2026)

    2026

  70. [78]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

    Huang, S., Lu, Z., Cheng, R., He, C.: Fapn: Feature-aligned pyramid network for dense image prediction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 864–873 (2021)

    2021

  71. [79]

    Multimedia Tools and Applications81(21), 30685–30704 (2022)

    Luo, Y., Cao, X., Zhang, J., Guo, J., Shen, H., Wang, T., Feng, Q.: Ce- fpn: enhancing channel information for object detection. Multimedia Tools and Applications81(21), 30685–30704 (2022)

    2022

  72. [80]

    Applied Intelligence 55(16), 1071 (2025) 27

    Li, J., Wang, Q., Dong, H.: Bafpn: bidirectionally aligning features to improve object localization accuracy in remote sensing images. Applied Intelligence 55(16), 1071 (2025) 27

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.