Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Physically Consistent Evaluation of Commonly Used Near-Field Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2602.10976 v2 pith:PUBWTTFU submitted 2026-02-11 eess.SP cs.ITmath.IT

classification eess.SPcs.ITmath.IT
keywords modelsnear-fieldcommonlyconsistentphysicallyreflectingstructuresused
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Near-field multi-antenna wireless communication has attracted growing research interest in recent years. Despite this development, most of the current literature on antennas and reflecting structures relies on simplified models, whose validity for real systems remains unclear. In this paper, we introduce a physically consistent near-field model, which we use to evaluate commonly used models. Our results indicate that common models are sufficient for basic beamfocusing, but fail to accurately predict the sidelobes and frequency dependence of reflecting structures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Physically Consistent Assessment of Nearfield Beamfocusing into Occluded Regions

    eess.SP 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A simple line-of-sight beam strategy matches or beats Airy beams in partially occluded nearfield regions, and the optimal strategy for fully occluded regions is directly computable from a physically consistent model.

Pith tools