REVIEW 1 cited by
Physically Consistent Evaluation of Commonly Used Near-Field Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Near-field multi-antenna wireless communication has attracted growing research interest in recent years. Despite this development, most of the current literature on antennas and reflecting structures relies on simplified models, whose validity for real systems remains unclear. In this paper, we introduce a physically consistent near-field model, which we use to evaluate commonly used models. Our results indicate that common models are sufficient for basic beamfocusing, but fail to accurately predict the sidelobes and frequency dependence of reflecting structures.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Physically Consistent Assessment of Nearfield Beamfocusing into Occluded Regions
A simple line-of-sight beam strategy matches or beats Airy beams in partially occluded nearfield regions, and the optimal strategy for fully occluded regions is directly computable from a physically consistent model.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.