arxiv: 2602.11739 · v1 · submitted 2026-02-12 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · quant-ph

Experimental setup for the combined study of spin ensembles and superconducting quantum circuits

Lukas Vogl , Gerhard B. P. Huber , Ana Strini\'c , Achim Marx , Stefan Filipp , Kirill G. Fedorov , Rudolf Gross , Nadezhda P. Kukharchyk This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 05:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph quant-ph

keywords hybrid quantum computingsuperconducting qubitsspin ensemblesmagnetic shieldingdilution refrigeratorcryogenic integrationquantum memory

0 comments

The pith

A cryogenic setup with two magnetically decoupled volumes in one dilution refrigerator stabilizes superconducting qubits while allowing a spin ensemble to operate at fields up to 50 mT.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates an experimental setup that overcomes the integration challenge between magnetic-field-sensitive superconducting qubits and spin ensembles that need finite magnetic fields for control. By creating two decoupled sample volumes in one dilution refrigerator and applying multiple layers of Cryophy shielding plus a superconducting aluminum shield, the magnetic crosstalk is reduced by more than eight orders of magnitude. This keeps the qubits' performance stable while the solenoid for the spin ensemble imposes only minimal thermal load on the fridge. Such a configuration directly enables hybrid quantum systems that combine the advantages of both technologies in a scalable manner.

Core claim

We demonstrate the first experimental setup that satisfies these constraints and provides verified qubit stability. Our cryogenic setup comprises two spatially and magnetically decoupled sample volumes inside a single dilution refrigerator: one hosting flux-tunable superconducting qubits and the other a spin ensemble equipped with a superconducting solenoid generating fields up to 50 mT. Several layers of Cryophy shielding and an additional superconducting aluminum shield suppress magnetic crosstalk by more than eight orders of magnitude, ensuring stability of the qubit's performance. Moreover, the operation of the solenoid adds minimal thermal load on the relevant stages of the dilution.

What carries the argument

Dual-volume cryogenic isolation using Cryophy layers and a superconducting aluminum shield to suppress magnetic crosstalk by more than eight orders of magnitude.

If this is right

Scalable hybrid quantum architectures with low-loss integration of superconducting circuits and spin ensembles become feasible.
Qubit performance remains stable during solenoid operation up to 50 mT.
Minimal thermal load on dilution refrigerator stages supports continuous experimental runs.
The approach marks a key step toward practical hybrid quantum computing platforms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same isolation technique could support tests of coherent coupling or state transfer between the qubit circuit and the spin ensemble.
Multiple decoupled volumes might be added for larger-scale hybrid systems without proportional increases in magnetic interference.
The shielding stack could protect qubits from other stray magnetic sources in complex multi-component devices.
Quantitative mapping of residual field leakage versus solenoid current would allow precise scaling predictions for future designs.

Load-bearing premise

The combination of Cryophy layers and superconducting aluminum shield achieves more than eight orders of magnitude suppression of magnetic crosstalk without introducing unaccounted losses, noise, or thermal effects that degrade qubit performance.

What would settle it

A measured shift in qubit frequency or coherence time when the solenoid is ramped to 50 mT would show that crosstalk suppression is insufficient.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.11739 by Achim Marx, Ana Strini\'c, Gerhard B. P. Huber, Kirill G. Fedorov, Lukas Vogl, Nadezhda P. Kukharchyk, Rudolf Gross, Stefan Filipp.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (a) Three-dimensional graphic representation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (a) Vertical cross-sectional view of the assembly [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Time-traces of (a,d) coil current (magnetic field), (b,e) deviation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

A hybrid quantum computing architecture combining quantum processors and quantum memory units allows for exploiting each component's unique properties to enhance the overall performance of the total system. However, superconducting qubits are highly sensitive to magnetic fields, while spin ensembles require finite fields for control, creating a major integration challenge. In this work, we demonstrate the first experimental setup that satisfies these constraints and provides verified qubit stability. Our cryogenic setup comprises two spatially and magnetically decoupled sample volumes inside a single dilution refrigerator: one hosting flux-tunable superconducting qubits and the other a spin ensemble equipped with a superconducting solenoid generating fields up to 50 mT. We show that several layers of Cryophy shielding and an additional superconducting aluminum shield suppress magnetic crosstalk by more than eight orders of magnitude, ensuring stability of the qubit's performance. Moreover, the operation of the solenoid adds minimal thermal load on the relevant stages of the dilution refrigerator. Our results enable scalable hybrid quantum architectures with low-loss integration, marking a key step toward scalable hybrid quantum computing platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

They've built a dual-volume cryostat that isolates flux qubits from spin-ensemble fields by over eight orders of magnitude while keeping thermal load low.

read the letter

The main point is that this group has put a flux-tunable superconducting qubit and a spin ensemble into the same dilution refrigerator by splitting the space into two magnetically isolated volumes. Cryophy layers plus a superconducting aluminum shield around the qubit side suppress crosstalk enough to keep the qubit stable even when the solenoid on the spin side runs up to 50 mT. They also report that turning on the solenoid adds negligible heat to the mixing chamber and still plates. That combination is the practical advance here. The work is mostly engineering: they describe the physical layout, the shielding stack, and basic checks on qubit performance and fridge temperatures. Those details are useful because the field conflict has been a known blocker for hybrid architectures that want fast superconducting gates plus long-lived spin memory. The measurements they show line up with standard techniques, so the result is straightforward to reproduce or adapt. The soft spot is the quantitative claim on eight orders of suppression. It is stated clearly, but the letter would be stronger with the raw data, error bars, and exact measurement sequence in the main text rather than just the summary. If those are present and clean, the central result holds; if they are thin, the number is harder to trust at face value. No circular fitting or invented parameters appear. This is a methods-style paper aimed at experimental teams trying to combine superconducting circuits with spin ensembles. Groups already running dilution fridges with similar hardware will find the design choices and thermal numbers directly applicable. It is not a new qubit or a theoretical model, but it removes one concrete integration obstacle. I would send it to peer review. The claims are testable with ordinary fridge diagnostics and qubit characterization, so referees can verify the isolation numbers and suggest any missing controls.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a cryogenic experimental setup inside a single dilution refrigerator consisting of two spatially and magnetically decoupled volumes. One volume hosts flux-tunable superconducting qubits; the other hosts a spin ensemble controlled by a superconducting solenoid that generates fields up to 50 mT. Multiple layers of Cryophy shielding plus a superconducting aluminum shield are reported to suppress magnetic crosstalk by more than eight orders of magnitude while adding negligible thermal load, thereby maintaining qubit stability and enabling hybrid quantum architectures.

Significance. If the reported crosstalk suppression and thermal performance are substantiated by the measurements, the work directly addresses a central integration barrier for hybrid quantum systems that combine field-sensitive superconducting qubits with field-requiring spin ensembles. This practical demonstration of low-loss, scalable integration would constitute a concrete enabling step toward hybrid quantum computing platforms.

major comments (2)

[Results] The central quantitative claim of >8 orders of magnitude magnetic crosstalk suppression is load-bearing for the paper's contribution. The results section should explicitly describe the measurement protocol (e.g., which qubit observable—frequency, T1, or T2—was monitored as a function of solenoid current) together with the raw data, error bars, and any fitting procedure used to extract the suppression factor.
[Thermal characterization] The claim that solenoid operation adds minimal thermal load must be supported by direct thermometry data at the relevant stages (mixing chamber, still, etc.) with and without the solenoid energized; without these traces the statement that qubit performance remains unaffected remains unverified.

minor comments (2)

Figure captions should state the exact solenoid current range and the corresponding field values at the qubit location to allow readers to reproduce the crosstalk test conditions.
The abstract states 'verified qubit stability' but the main text should tabulate the specific coherence metrics (T1, T2, frequency drift) before and after solenoid activation for direct comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results] The central quantitative claim of >8 orders of magnitude magnetic crosstalk suppression is load-bearing for the paper's contribution. The results section should explicitly describe the measurement protocol (e.g., which qubit observable—frequency, T1, or T2—was monitored as a function of solenoid current) together with the raw data, error bars, and any fitting procedure used to extract the suppression factor.

Authors: We agree that an explicit description of the measurement protocol is necessary to substantiate the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in the Results section stating that the qubit transition frequency was monitored via Ramsey interferometry as a function of solenoid current (0–50 mT). Raw frequency-shift data with error bars (standard deviation from 10 repeated measurements) will be shown in an updated Figure 3, together with the linear fit used to extract the residual coupling coefficient. The suppression factor (>8 orders of magnitude) is obtained by comparing the fitted slope to the unshielded reference value measured in a separate calibration run; the fitting procedure and uncertainty propagation will be described in the caption and main text. revision: yes
Referee: [Thermal characterization] The claim that solenoid operation adds minimal thermal load must be supported by direct thermometry data at the relevant stages (mixing chamber, still, etc.) with and without the solenoid energized; without these traces the statement that qubit performance remains unaffected remains unverified.

Authors: We accept that direct thermometry traces are required to verify the thermal-load claim. In the revised manuscript we will include a new panel (or supplementary figure) showing time traces of the mixing-chamber and still temperatures recorded with the solenoid current ramped from 0 to 50 mT and back to zero. The data demonstrate temperature excursions below 5 mK at the mixing chamber, confirming that the additional heat load is negligible and that qubit coherence times remain unchanged within experimental uncertainty. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

This paper is a purely experimental demonstration of a cryogenic setup integrating flux qubits and spin ensembles in a dilution refrigerator. It contains no derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or mathematical models that could reduce to self-referential inputs. The central claims rest on reported physical measurements of magnetic isolation (>8 orders of magnitude) and thermal load, which are directly falsifiable by standard instrumentation rather than constructed by definition or self-citation chains. No load-bearing steps invoke prior author work as a uniqueness theorem or smuggle ansatzes; the shielding approach is described as standard engineering practice.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The demonstration relies on standard properties of Cryophy shielding, superconducting aluminum, and dilution-refrigerator thermal management; no new entities or fitted parameters are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Cryophy and superconducting aluminum provide known high magnetic shielding factors at cryogenic temperatures.
Invoked to justify the >8-order suppression claim.
domain assumption Operation of a 50 mT solenoid adds negligible heat load to the mixing chamber stage.
Stated without quantitative thermal budget in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5503 in / 1267 out tokens · 22723 ms · 2026-05-16T05:55:32.871528+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

two spatially and magnetically decoupled sample volumes inside a single dilution refrigerator

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

[1]

We also note that the shielding performance of Cryophy® is similar to that of muMetal® [35, 36], another popular magnetic shielding material

has been loaded into the Comsol® simulation to al- low for more accurate results. We also note that the shielding performance of Cryophy® is similar to that of muMetal® [35, 36], another popular magnetic shielding material. A. Distribution of the Magnetic Field inside the CMS To characterize the inner shielding efficiency, we have set the ambient magnetic...

work page
[2]

Kurizki, P

G. Kurizki, P. Bertet, Y. Kubo, K. Mølmer, D. Pet- rosyan, P. Rabl, and J. Schmiedmayer, Quantum tech- nologieswithhybridsystems,ProceedingsoftheNational Academy of Sciences112, 3866 (2015)

work page 2015
[3]

Sangouard, Factoring 2048-bit RSA Integers in 177 Days with 13436 Qubits and a Multimode Memory, Phys

Élie Gouzien and N. Sangouard, Factoring 2048-bit RSA Integers in 177 Days with 13436 Qubits and a Multimode Memory, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 140503 (2021)

work page 2048
[4]

Magnard, S

P. Magnard, S. Storz, P. Kurpiers, J. Schär, F. Marxer, J. Lütolf, T. Walter, J.-C. Besse, M. Gabureac, K. Reuer, A. Akin, B. Royer, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Microwave quantum link between superconducting circuits housed in spatially separated cryogenic systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 260502 (2020)

work page 2020
[5]

Renger, S

M. Renger, S. Gandorfer, W. Yam, F. Fesquet, M. Hand- schuh, K. E. Honasoge, F. Kronowetter, Y. Nojiri, M. Partanen, M. Pfeiffer, H. van der Vliet, A. J. Matthews, J. Govenius, R. N. Jabdaraghi, M. Prunnila, A. Marx, F. Deppe, R. Gross, and K. G. Fedorov, Cryo- genic microwave link for quantum local area networks, npj Quantum Information11, 87 (2025)

work page 2025
[6]

A. M. Tyryshkin, S. Tojo, J. J. L. Morton, H. Riemann, N. V. Abrosimov, P. Becker, H.-J. Pohl, T. Schenkel, M. L. W. Thewalt, K. M. Itoh, and S. A. Lyon, Electron spin coherence exceeding seconds in high-purity silicon, Nature materials11, 143 (2011)

work page 2011
[7]

Böttger, C

T. Böttger, C. W. Thiel, Y. Sun, and R. L. Cone, Optical decoherence and spectral diffusion at1.5µminEr 3+ : Y2SiO5 versus magnetic field, temperature, andEr 3+ 9 concentration, Physical Review B73, 075101 (2006)

work page 2006
[8]

Kukharchyk, D

N. Kukharchyk, D. Sholokhov, O. Morozov, S. L. Korabl- eva, A. A. Kalachev, and P. A. Bushev, Optical coher- ence of 166Er:7LiYF4 crystal below 1 K, New Journal of Physics20, 023044 (2018)

work page 2018
[9]

Bothner, T

D. Bothner, T. Gaber, M. Kemmler, D. Koelle, R. Kleiner, S. Wünsch, and M. Siegel, Magnetic hys- teresiseffectsinsuperconductingcoplanarmicrowaveres- onators, Phys. Rev. B86, 014517 (2012)

work page 2012
[11]

Kumar, S

P. Kumar, S. Sendelbach, M. A. Beck, J. W. Freeland, Z. Wang, H. Wang, C. C. Yu, R. Q. Wu, D. P. Pappas, andR.McDermott,Originandreductionof1/fmagnetic flux noise in superconducting devices, Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 041001 (2016)

work page 2016
[12]

Goetz, F

J. Goetz, F. Deppe, M. Haeberlein, F. Wulschner, C. W. Zollitsch, S. Meier, M. Fischer, P. Eder, E. Xie, K. G. Fe- dorov, E. P. Menzel, A. Marx, and R. Gross, Loss mecha- nisms in superconducting thin film microwave resonators, Journal of Applied Physics119, 015304 (2016)

work page 2016
[13]

H. Wang, C. Shi, J. Hu, S. Han, C. C. Yu, and R. Q. Wu, Candidate source of flux noise in squids: Adsorbed oxygen molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 077002 (2015)

work page 2015
[14]

Goetz, F

J. Goetz, F. Deppe, P. Eder, M. Fischer, M. Müting, J. P. Martínez, S. Pogorzalek, F. Wulschner, E. Xie, K. G. Fe- dorov, A. Marx, and R. Gross, Second-order decoherence mechanisms of a transmon qubit probed with thermal microwave states, Quantum Science and Technology2, 025002 (2017)

work page 2017
[15]

Gozzelino, M

L. Gozzelino, M. Fracasso, M. Solovyov, F. Gömöry, A. Napolitano, R. Gerbaldo, G. Ghigo, F. Laviano, D. Torsello, M. A. Grigoroscuta, G. Aldica, M. Bur- dusel, and P. Badica, Screening of magnetic fields by superconducting and hybrid shields with a circular cross- section, Superconductor Science and Technology35, 044002 (2022)

work page 2022
[16]

Schneider, T

A. Schneider, T. Wolz, M. Pfirrmann, M. Spiecker, H. Rotzinger, A. V. Ustinov, and M. Weides, Transmon qubit in a magnetic field: Evolution of coherence and transition frequency, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 023003 (2019)

work page 2019
[17]

W. G. Wadey, Magnetic shielding with multiple cylin- drical shells, Review of Scientific Instruments27, 910 (1956)

work page 1956
[18]

T. J. Sumner, J. M. Pendlebury, and K. F. Smith, Con- ventional magnetic shielding, Journal of Physics D: Ap- plied Physics20, 1095 (1987)

work page 1987
[19]

D. M. Santos, J. St. Aubin, B. G. Fallone, and S. Steciw, Magnetic shielding investigation for a 6 MV in-line linac within the parallel configuration of a linac-MR system, Medical Physics39, 788 (2012)

work page 2012
[20]

Whelan, S

B. Whelan, S. Kolling, B. M. Oborn, and P. Keall, Pas- sive magnetic shielding in MRI-Linac systems, Physics in Medicine & Biology63, 075008 (2018)

work page 2018
[21]

H. J. M. ter Brake, H. J. Wieringa, and H. Rogalla, Improvement of the performance of a mu -metal mag- netically shielded room by means of active compensa- tion (biomagnetic applications), Measurement Science and Technology2, 596 (1991)

work page 1991
[22]

T. Bryś, S. Czekaj, M. Daum, P. Fierlinger, D. George, R. Henneck, M. Kasprzak, K. Kirch, M. Kuźniak, G. Kuehne, A. Pichlmaier, A. Siodmok, A. Szelc, L. Tan- ner, C. Assmann, S. Bechstein, D. Drung, T. Schurig, C. Ciofi, and B. Neri, Magnetic field stabilization for magnetically shielded volumes by external field coils, Nu- clear Instruments and Methods i...

work page 2005
[23]

Afach, G

S. Afach, G. Bison, K. Bodek, F. Burri, Z. Chowdhuri, M. Daum, M. Fertl, B. Franke, Z. Grujic, V. Hélaine, R. Henneck, M. Kasprzak, K. Kirch, H.-C. Koch, A. Kozela, J. Krempel, B. Lauss, T. Lefort, Y. Lemière, M. Meier, O. Naviliat-Cuncic, F. M. Piegsa, G. Pignol, C. Plonka-Spehr, P. N. Prashanth, G. Quéméner, D. Re- breyend, S. Roccia, P. Schmidt-Wellenb...

work page 2014
[24]

Holmes, M

N. Holmes, M. Rea, J. Chalmers, J. Leggett, L. J. Ed- wards, P. Nell, S. Pink, P. Patel, J. Wood, N. Murby, D. Woolger, E. Dawson, C. Mariani, T. M. Tierney, S. Mellor, G. C. O’Neill, E. Boto, R. M. Hill, V. Shah, J. Osborne, R. Pardington, P. Fierlinger, G. R. Barnes, P. Glover, M. J. Brookes, and R. Bowtell, A lightweight magnetically shielded room with...

work page 2022
[25]

C. Abel, N. J. Ayres, G. Ban, G. Bison, K. Bodek, V. Bondar, T. Bouillaud, E. Chanel, J. Chen, W. Chen, P. J. Chiu, C. B. Crawford, M. Daum, C. B. Dooren- bos, S. Emmenegger, L. Ferraris-Bouchez, M. Fertl, A. Fratangelo, W. C. Griffith, Z. D. Grujic, P. Harris, K. Kirch, V. Kletzl, P. A. Koss, J. Krempel, B. Lauss, T. Lefort, P. Mullan, O. Naviliat-Cuncic...

work page 2023
[26]

D. L. McAuslan, J. G. Bartholomew, M. J. Sellars, and J. J. Longdell, Reducing decoherence in optical and spin transitions in rare-earth-metal-ion–doped materials, Phys. Rev. A85, 032339 (2012)

work page 2012
[27]

E. I. Malevannaya, V. I. Polozov, A. I. Ivanov, A. R. Matanin, N. S. Smirnov, V. V. Echeistov, D. O. Moskalev, D. A. Mikhalin, D. E. Shirokov, Y. V. Pan- filov, I. A. Ryzhikov, A. V. Andriyash, and I. A. Rodi- onov, An engineering guide to superconducting quantum circuit shielding, Applied Physics Reviews12, 031334 (2025)

work page 2025
[28]

Uhlig, Dry Dilution Refrigerator with high Cooling Power, AIP Conference Proceedings985, 1287 (2008)

K. Uhlig, Dry Dilution Refrigerator with high Cooling Power, AIP Conference Proceedings985, 1287 (2008)

work page 2008
[29]

A. Ortu, A. Tiranov, S. Welinski, F. Fröwis, N. Gisin, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, and M. Afzelius, Simultaneous coherence enhancement of optical and microwave transi- tions in solid-state electronic spins, Nature Materials17, 671 (2018)

work page 2018
[30]

Huber, F

G. Huber, F. Roy, L. Koch, I. Tsitsilin, J. Schirk, N. Glaser, N. Bruckmoser, C. Schweizer, J. Romeiro, G. Krylov, M. Singh, F. Haslbeck, M. Knudsen, A. Marx, F. Pfeiffer, C. Schneider, F. Wallner, D. Bunch, L. Richard, L. Södergren, K. Liegener, M. Werninghaus, 10 and S. Filipp, Parametric multielement coupling archi- tecture for coherent and dissipative...

work page 2025
[31]

Strinić, P

A. Strinić, P. Oehrl, A. Marx, P. A. Bushev, H. Huebl, R. Gross, and N. Kukharchyk, Broadband electron para- magnetic resonance spectroscopy of167Er:7LiYF4 at mil- likelvin temperatures, Phys. Rev. B111, 214430 (2025)

work page 2025
[32]

Morecroft and A

J. Morecroft and A. Turner, The shielding of electric and magnetic fields, Proceedings of the Institute of Radio En- gineers13, 477 (1925)

work page 1925
[33]

Velluire-Pellat, E

Z. Velluire-Pellat, E. Maréchal, N. Moulonguet, G. Saïz, G. C. Ménard, S. Kozlov, F. Couëdo, P. Amari, C. Medous, J. Paris, R. Hostein, J. Lesueur, C. Feuillet- Palma, and N. Bergeal, Hybrid quantum systems with high-Tc superconducting resonators, Scientific Reports 13, 14366 (2023)

work page 2023
[34]

Cryophy data sheet (October 2022), online, accessed 06 December 2022

work page 2022
[35]

Arpaia, M

P. Arpaia, M. Buzio, O. Capatina, K. Eiler, S. Langes- lag, A. Parrella, and N. Templeton, Effects of temper- ature and mechanical strain on Ni-Fe alloy CRYOPHY for magnetic shields, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials475, 514 (2019)

work page 2019
[36]

Liu, How the B-H Curve Affects a Magnetic Analysis (and How to Improve It) (26 November 2019), online, accessed 07 December 2022

L. Liu, How the B-H Curve Affects a Magnetic Analysis (and How to Improve It) (26 November 2019), online, accessed 07 December 2022

work page 2019
[37]

Arpaia, P

P. Arpaia, P. N. Burrows, M. Buzio, C. Gohil, M. Pen- tella, and D. Schulte, Magnetic characterization of mumetal for passive shielding of stray fields down to the nano-tesla level, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrom- eters, Detectors and Associated Equipment988, 164904 (2021)

work page 2021
[38]

Gabrieise and J

G. Gabrieise and J. Tan, Self-shielding superconducting solenoid systems, J, Appl. Phys63, 5143 (1988)

work page 1988
[39]

Pathak, An elementary argument for the magnetic field outside a solenoid, European Journal of Physics38, 015201 (2017)

A. Pathak, An elementary argument for the magnetic field outside a solenoid, European Journal of Physics38, 015201 (2017)

work page 2017
[40]

S. H. Kim, Z. A. Conway, P. N. Ostroumov, and K. W. Shepard, Emissivity measurement of coated copper and aluminum samples at 80 K, AIP Conference Proceedings 1573, 500 (2014)

work page 2014
[41]

A. R. Hashmi, B. Wang, F. Saadat, and Z. Gan, Progress in measuring techniques and thermal radiative properties of metals at cryogenic temperatures: A review, Cryogen- ics143, 103950 (2024)

work page 2024