pith. sign in

arxiv: 2602.13076 · v2 · pith:AUURFA24new · submitted 2026-02-13 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · physics.comp-ph

Enhanced numerical approaches for modeling insoluble surfactants in two-phase flows with the diffuse-interface method

Shu Yamashita , Shintaro Matsushita , Tetsuya Suekane This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 13:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn physics.comp-ph
keywords insoluble surfactantsdiffuse-interface methodtwo-phase flowsinterfacial transportnumerical modelingmass conservationdelta functionbenchmark test case
0
0 comments X

The pith

Two simple changes to the diffuse-interface method raise the accuracy of insoluble surfactant transport in two-phase flows while keeping mass exactly conserved.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper seeks to fix accuracy problems in tracking how insoluble surfactants move along fluid interfaces when using the diffuse-interface method for two-phase flow simulations. It replaces the usual transport equation with a version that skips taking spatial derivatives of quantities that jump sharply at the interface, and it lets the delta function width be chosen separately from the interface thickness parameter. These adjustments require almost no extra work to code or run, yet they keep both the fluid and the surfactant mass conserved at the discrete level and do not blur the captured interface. A battery of tests shows the gains, and a new demanding benchmark problem is supplied so other researchers can compare methods fairly.

Core claim

Adopting a formulation of the surfactant transport equation that avoids spatial derivatives of sharply varying fields, together with allowing the delta-function width to be prescribed independently of the interface width, yields higher accuracy for interfacial surfactant transport in diffuse-interface simulations of two-phase flows, while exactly preserving discrete conservation of both fluid and surfactant mass and without degrading interface resolution or adding significant cost.

What carries the argument

Derivative-avoiding reformulation of the surfactant transport equation paired with an independently tunable delta-function width inside the diffuse-interface representation.

If this is right

  • Surfactant concentration along the interface is obtained with noticeably smaller numerical error than in standard formulations.
  • Both fluid volume and surfactant mass remain conserved to machine precision on the discrete grid.
  • Interface-capturing quality stays at the level of conventional diffuse-interface schemes.
  • The new challenging test case supplies a reproducible benchmark for comparing future surfactant-transport methods.
  • Only modest code changes are needed, so existing diffuse-interface solvers can adopt the improvements quickly.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same derivative-avoiding and width-decoupling ideas could be applied to other interfacial scalar fields such as heat or species concentration in multiphase problems.
  • Long-time simulations of surfactant-affected droplet breakup or coalescence might accumulate less error and run more reliably.
  • Hybrid schemes that combine the modified diffuse-interface treatment with level-set or volume-of-fluid tracking could be tested for further gains.
  • Direct comparison against micro-PIV or fluorescence experiments on surfactant-covered interfaces would provide an external check on the simulated transport.

Load-bearing premise

The set of numerical tests and the newly introduced challenging benchmark case are representative enough to establish that the accuracy gains hold in general without hidden parameter tuning or loss of interface quality in other regimes.

What would settle it

In the challenging test case, if the computed surfactant distribution or interface shape deviates substantially from a reference solution obtained on a much finer mesh or with an independent high-accuracy method, the claimed accuracy improvement would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.13076 by Shintaro Matsushita, Shu Yamashita, Tetsuya Suekane.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic illustrating the representation of surfactant concentration using the di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic of the interfacial surfactant transport models compared in this study: the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic of the proposed Approach 2 in Section 3.2. Conventionally, the delta function is computed directly from the phase-field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic of surfactant diffusion on a circular interface advected by a uniform velocity field, as described in Section 5.1. 5.1. Surfactant diffusion in 2D uniform flow In this test case, the surfactant diffuses along a circular interface advected by a uniform velocity field. As shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Error in surfactant concentration at t = 5 for the case of surfactant diffusion in uniform flow, as described in Section 5.1. Two different diffusion coefficients are examined: (a) D = 10−2 and (b) D = 10−9 . The test is performed using three different grid resolutions: 322 , 642 , and 1282 , corresponding to 16, 32, and 64 grid points per diameter d0, respectively. Wˆ denotes the width of the delta functi… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Errors for various widths of the delta function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schematic of surfactant transport in a 2D vortical flow, as described in Section 5.2. A bubble is deformed by the periodic vortical velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Errors in surfactant concentration at t = 2T for the 2D vortical flow test described in Section 5.2. Simulations are performed using different widths Wˆ of the delta function for both the fd-type and f-type models. The grid resolutions are 642 , 1282 , and 2562 , corresponding to 19.2, 38.4, and 76.8 grid points per bubble diameter d0, respectively. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Errors in surfactant concentration for various widths of the delta function in the 2D vortical flow test described in Section 5.2. Results [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Schematic of surfactant transport in a 3D vortical flow, as described in Section 5.3. A drop is deformed by the periodic vortical velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Errors in the surfactant concentration at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Errors in the surfactant concentration f at t = T for the f-type model using various delta function widths (Wˆ = 3∆x, 5∆x, 7∆x, and 9∆x) in the 3D vortical flow test described in Section 5.3. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Drop shape at t = 8 s in the 2D shear flow test described in Section 5.4. The result reported by Teigen et al. [36] is used as a reference for the case with the Marangoni force. 𝑡 = 0 𝑡 = 𝑇/2 𝑡 = 𝑇 𝑡 = 3𝑇/2 𝑡 = 2𝑇 The location of maximum error Tracking the location of maximum error 𝑡 = 3𝑇 2 = 3 ⁄ 𝑡 = 3.2 𝑡 = 3.4 𝑡 = 3.6 𝑡 = 3.8 𝑡 = 2𝑇 = 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Interface deformation and surfactant concentration in the challenging benchmark test described in Section 5.5. The deformation is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Surfactant concentration error at t = 2T in the highly deforming benchmark case described in Section 5.5. • Reduce D. Reducing D helps mitigate the negative impact of inaccurate normal vectors on the accuracy of surfactant transport [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Improved accuracy of surfactant transport in the highly deforming benchmark case (Section 5.5) is demonstrated for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Surfactants reside at the interface of two-phase flows and significantly influence the flow dynamics. Numerical simulations are essential for a comprehensive understanding of such surfactant-laden flows and require a method that can accurately simulate surfactant transport along the interface. In this study, we focus on interfacial transport models for insoluble surfactants based on the diffuse-interface method and propose two approaches to improve their accuracy: (a) adopting a formulation that avoids the spatial derivatives of variables with sharp gradients and (b) allowing the width of the delta function to be specified independently of the interface width. These approaches are simple and practical in that they do not lead to significant increases in computational cost, implementation complexity, or degradation of interface-capturing accuracy. Moreover, they preserve the discrete conservation of both fluid and surfactant mass. We conduct a series of numerical tests to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches. Finally, we present a challenging test case that is difficult to solve accurately and has not been previously discussed. We expect this case to serve as a valuable benchmark for evaluating and comparing the performances of various methods proposed in the literature.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes two practical enhancements to diffuse-interface modeling of insoluble surfactants in two-phase flows: (a) a reformulation that avoids explicit spatial derivatives of sharply varying fields, and (b) independent specification of the delta-function width used for surfactant transport from the Cahn-Hilliard interface width. The authors assert that both changes improve accuracy of interfacial surfactant transport, preserve discrete conservation of fluid and surfactant mass, incur negligible extra cost or implementation effort, and do not degrade interface-capturing quality. A new challenging test case is introduced as a community benchmark.

Significance. If the conservation properties and accuracy gains are robustly demonstrated, the work would supply immediately usable improvements to a common class of multiphase-flow codes. The explicit preservation of discrete mass conservation and the introduction of a new benchmark are concrete strengths that could aid reproducibility and method comparison in the field.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical tests and approach (b) formulation] The decoupling of delta-function width from interface width (approach b) introduces an additional length scale whose effect on long-time consistency with the underlying phase-field equilibrium is not secured by the reported tests. The manuscript should demonstrate that this choice does not generate accumulating spurious Marangoni stresses or surfactant redistribution in regimes outside the presented suite (e.g., high capillary-number breakup or extended relaxation).
  2. [Conservation analysis] The claim that the new approaches preserve discrete conservation of both fluid and surfactant mass must be supported by explicit discrete conservation statements or proofs for the chosen discretization; the abstract alone does not establish that the independent delta width leaves the underlying Cahn-Hilliard evolution unaltered at the discrete level.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Error metrics, grid resolutions, and baseline comparisons used to quantify accuracy improvement should be stated explicitly in the abstract or early results section.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should indicate the specific values chosen for the independent delta width in each test so that readers can reproduce the reported behavior.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and positive assessment of the significance of our work. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical tests and approach (b) formulation] The decoupling of delta-function width from interface width (approach b) introduces an additional length scale whose effect on long-time consistency with the underlying phase-field equilibrium is not secured by the reported tests. The manuscript should demonstrate that this choice does not generate accumulating spurious Marangoni stresses or surfactant redistribution in regimes outside the presented suite (e.g., high capillary-number breakup or extended relaxation).

    Authors: We agree that additional verification of long-time behavior strengthens the claim for approach (b). Our existing tests cover a range of regimes and exhibit no spurious accumulation, but we acknowledge that the referee's suggested cases (high capillary-number breakup and extended relaxation) lie outside the current suite. We will add these simulations to the revised manuscript, confirming that the independent delta width does not produce accumulating spurious Marangoni stresses or unphysical surfactant redistribution while preserving phase-field equilibrium. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Conservation analysis] The claim that the new approaches preserve discrete conservation of both fluid and surfactant mass must be supported by explicit discrete conservation statements or proofs for the chosen discretization; the abstract alone does not establish that the independent delta width leaves the underlying Cahn-Hilliard evolution unaltered at the discrete level.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. Although the manuscript states that discrete conservation is preserved and the Cahn-Hilliard equation remains unchanged, we agree that an explicit discrete-level analysis is needed rather than relying on the abstract. In the revised version we will insert a dedicated subsection that provides the discrete conservation statements for fluid mass and surfactant mass under the chosen finite-difference discretization, explicitly verifying that the independent delta-function width leaves the Cahn-Hilliard evolution unaltered at the discrete level. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in proposed numerical formulations or validation

full rationale

The paper introduces two explicit new numerical formulations for surfactant transport in the diffuse-interface method and validates them via independent test cases that check conservation properties and accuracy. No derivation step reduces a claimed prediction or result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the central improvements are presented as direct changes to the discrete operators and length-scale choices, with performance assessed externally through numerical experiments rather than by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work builds on the standard diffuse-interface framework for two-phase flows; no new free parameters, invented physical entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced beyond the usual continuum assumptions of the method.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The diffuse-interface method accurately captures interface dynamics when the interface is smoothed over a finite width.
    The enhancements operate inside this established modeling framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5731 in / 1306 out tokens · 43621 ms · 2026-05-21T13:36:47.413806+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bajpai, V

    D. Bajpai, V . Tyagi, Laundry detergents: An overview, Journal of Oleo Science 56 (7) (2007) 327–340.doi: 10.5650/jos.56.327

    work page doi:10.5650/jos.56.327 2007

  2. [2]

    Nitschke, S

    M. Nitschke, S. Costa, Biosurfactants in food industry, Trends in Food Science & Technology 18 (5) (2007) 252–259.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2007.01.002. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924224407000362

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2007.01.002 2007

  3. [3]

    A. F. Belhaj, K. A. Elraies, S. M. Mahmood, N. N. Zulkifli, S. Akbari, O. S. Hussien, The effect of surfactant concentration, salinity, temperature, and ph on surfactant adsorption for chemical enhanced oil recovery: a review, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology 10 (1) (2020) 125–137.doi:10.1007/ s13202-019-0685-y. URLhttps://doi.or...

    work page doi:10.1007/s13202-019-0685-y 2020

  4. [4]

    Massarweh, A

    O. Massarweh, A. S. Abushaikha, The use of surfactants in enhanced oil recovery: A review of recent advances, Energy Reports 6 (2020) 3150–3178.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.009. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352484720314347

    work page doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.009 2020

  5. [5]

    Trellu, E

    C. Trellu, E. Mousset, Y . Pechaud, D. Huguenot, E. D. van Hullebusch, G. Esposito, M. A. Oturan, Removal of hydrophobic organic pollutants from soil washing/flushing solutions: A critical review, Journal of Hazardous Materials 306 (2016) 149–174.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.008. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S03043...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.008 2016

  6. [6]

    Baret, Surfactants in droplet-based microfluidics, Lab Chip 12 (2012) 422–433.doi:10.1039/ C1LC20582J

    J.-C. Baret, Surfactants in droplet-based microfluidics, Lab Chip 12 (2012) 422–433.doi:10.1039/ C1LC20582J. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C1LC20582J

    work page doi:10.1039/c1lc20582j 2012

  7. [7]

    S. L. Anna, Droplets and bubbles in microfluidic devices, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 48 (V olume 48,

    work page

  8. [8]

    URLhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/ annurev-fluid-122414-034425

    (2016) 285–309.doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034425. URLhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/ annurev-fluid-122414-034425

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034425 2016

  9. [9]

    N. M. Kovalchuk, M. J. Simmons, Review of the role of surfactant dynamics in drop microfluidics, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 312 (2023) 102844.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2023.102844. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001868623000118

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cis.2023.102844 2023

  10. [10]

    Batchvarov, L

    A. Batchvarov, L. Kahouadji, C. R. Constante-Amores, G. F. Norões Gonçalves, S. Shin, J. Chergui, D. Juric, R. V . Craster, O. K. Matar, Three-dimensional dynamics of falling films in the presence of insoluble surfactants, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 906 (2021) A16.doi:10.1017/jfm.2020.796

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2020.796 2021

  11. [11]

    Constante-Amores, A

    C. Constante-Amores, A. Batchvarov, L. Kahouadji, S. Shin, J. Chergui, D. Juric, O. Matar, Role of surfactant- induced marangoni stresses in drop-interface coalescence, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 925 (2021) A15.doi: 10.1017/jfm.2021.682. 22

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2021.682 2021

  12. [12]

    Kalli, P

    M. Kalli, P. Pico, L. Chagot, L. Kahouadji, S. Shin, J. Chergui, D. Juric, O. Matar, P. Angeli, Effect of surfactants during drop formation in a microfluidic channel: a combined experimental and computational fluid dynamics approach, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 961 (2023) A15.doi:10.1017/jfm.2023.213

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2023.213 2023

  13. [13]

    Constante-Amores, L

    C. Constante-Amores, L. Kahouadji, S. Shin, J. Chergui, D. Juric, J. Castrejón-Pita, O. Matar, A. Castrejón- Pita, Impact of droplets onto surfactant-laden thin liquid films, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 961 (2023) A8. doi:10.1017/jfm.2023.224

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2023.224 2023

  14. [14]

    P. Pico, L. Kahouadji, S. Shin, J. Chergui, D. Juric, O. K. Matar, Surfactant-laden bubble bursting: Dynamics of capillary waves and worthington jet at large bond number, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9 (2024) 083606.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevFluids.9.083606. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.083606

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.9.083606 2024

  15. [15]

    Eshima, T

    J. Eshima, T. Aurégan, P. K. Farsoiya, S. Popinet, H. A. Stone, L. Deike, Size amplification of jet drops due to insoluble surfactants, Phys. Rev. Fluids 10 (2025) 123604.doi:10.1103/t9k3-dqyc. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/t9k3-dqyc

    work page doi:10.1103/t9k3-dqyc 2025

  16. [16]

    T. Dong, W. H. Weheliye, P. Angeli, Laser induced fluorescence studies on the distribution of surfactants dur- ing drop/interface coalescence, Physics of Fluids 31 (1) (2019) 012106.arXiv:https://pubs.aip.org/ aip/pof/article-pdf/doi/10.1063/1.5059554/15978381/012106\_1\_online.pdf,doi:10.1063/ 1.5059554. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.5059554

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5059554/15978381/012106 2019

  17. [17]

    Y . Y . Renardy, M. Renardy, V . Cristini, A new volume-of-fluid formulation for surfactants and simulations of drop deformation under shear at a low viscosity ratio, European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids 21 (1) (2002) 49–59.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0997-7546(01)01159-1. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0997754601011591

    work page doi:10.1016/s0997-7546(01)01159-1 2002

  18. [19]

    Xu, H.-K

    J.-J. Xu, H.-K. Zhao, An eulerian formulation for solving partial differential equations along a moving interface, Journal of Scientific Computing 19 (1) (2003) 573–594.doi:10.1023/A:1025336916176. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025336916176

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1025336916176 2003

  19. [20]

    J.-J. Xu, Z. Li, J. Lowengrub, H. Zhao, A level-set method for interfacial flows with surfactant, Journal of Computational Physics 212 (2) (2006) 590–616.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2005.07.016. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999105003475

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2005.07.016 2006

  20. [21]

    J.-J. Xu, Y . Yang, J. Lowengrub, A level-set continuum method for two-phase flows with insoluble surfactant, Journal of Computational Physics 231 (17) (2012) 5897–5909.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp. 2012.05.014. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999112002562

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp 2012

  21. [22]

    J.-J. Xu, W. Ren, A level-set method for two-phase flows with moving contact line and insoluble surfactant, Journal of Computational Physics 263 (2014) 71–90.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.01. 012. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999114000394

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2014.01 2014

  22. [23]

    J.-J. Xu, W. Shi, M.-C. Lai, A level-set method for two-phase flows with soluble surfactant, Journal of Compu- tational Physics 353 (2018) 336–355.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.10.019. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999117307726 23

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.10.019 2018

  23. [25]

    Muradoglu, G

    M. Muradoglu, G. Tryggvason, Simulations of soluble surfactants in 3d multiphase flow, Journal of Computa- tional Physics 274 (2014) 737–757.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.06.024. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999114004318

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2014.06.024 2014

  24. [26]

    S. Shin, J. Chergui, D. Juric, L. Kahouadji, O. K. Matar, R. V . Craster, A hybrid interface tracking – level set technique for multiphase flow with soluble surfactant, Journal of Computational Physics 359 (2018) 409–435. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.01.010. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999118300202

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.01.010 2018

  25. [27]

    Chiu, Y .-T

    P.-H. Chiu, Y .-T. Lin, A conservative phase field method for solving incompressible two-phase flows, Journal of Computational Physics 230 (1) (2011) 185–204.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.09.021. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999110005243

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2010.09.021 2011

  26. [28]

    Mirjalili, C

    S. Mirjalili, C. B. Ivey, A. Mani, Comparison between the diffuse interface and volume of fluid methods for simulating two-phase flows, International Journal of Multiphase Flow 116 (2019) 221–238.doi:https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.04.019. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301932218309030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.04.019 2019

  27. [29]

    Mirjalili, C

    S. Mirjalili, C. B. Ivey, A. Mani, A conservative diffuse interface method for two-phase flows with provable boundedness properties, Journal of Computational Physics 401 (2020) 109006.doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jcp.2019.109006. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999119307119

    work page arXiv 2020

  28. [30]

    Mirjalili, A

    S. Mirjalili, A. Mani, Consistent, energy-conserving momentum transport for simulations of two-phase flows using the phase field equations, Journal of Computational Physics 426 (2021) 109918.doi:https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109918. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999120306926

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109918 2021

  29. [31]

    S. S. Jain, Accurate conservative phase-field method for simulation of two-phase flows, Journal of Computational Physics 469 (2022) 111529.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111529. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999122005915

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111529 2022

  30. [32]

    Mirjalili, M

    S. Mirjalili, M. A. Khanwale, A. Mani, Assessment of an energy-based surface tension model for simulation of two-phase flows using second-order phase field methods, Journal of Computational Physics 474 (2023) 111795. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111795. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999122008580

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111795 2023

  31. [33]

    Hwang, S

    H. Hwang, S. S. Jain, A robust phase-field method for two-phase flows on unstructured grids, Journal of Com- putational Physics 507 (2024) 112972.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2024.112972. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999124002213

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2024.112972 2024

  32. [34]

    J. Kim, Numerical simulations of phase separation dynamics in a water–oil–surfactant system, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 303 (1) (2006) 272–279.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2006.07.032. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021979706006345

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2006.07.032 2006

  33. [35]

    R. G. M. van der Sman, S. van der Graaf, Diffuse interface model of surfactant adsorption onto flat and droplet interfaces, Rheologica Acta 46 (1) (2006) 3–11.doi:10.1007/s00397-005-0081-z. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-005-0081-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s00397-005-0081-z 2006

  34. [36]

    H. Liu, Y . Zhang, Phase-field modeling droplet dynamics with soluble surfactants, Journal of Computational Physics 229 (24) (2010) 9166–9187.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2010.08.031. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002199911000478X 24

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2010.08.031 2010

  35. [37]

    Automatic reconstruction of parametric building models from indoor point clouds

    K. Erik Teigen, P. Song, J. Lowengrub, A. V oigt, A diffuse-interface method for two-phase flows with soluble surfactants, Journal of Computational Physics 230 (2) (2011) 375–393.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jcp.2010.09.020. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999110005231

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2011

  36. [38]

    S. Gu, H. Zhang, Z. Zhang, An energy-stable finite-difference scheme for the binary fluid-surfactant system, Journal of Computational Physics 270 (2014) 416–431.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.03. 060. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999114002472

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2014.03 2014

  37. [39]

    P. K. Farsoiya, S. Popinet, H. A. Stone, L. Deike, Coupled volume of fluid and phase field method for direct numerical simulation of insoluble surfactant-laden interfacial flows and application to rising bubbles, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9 (2024) 094004.doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.094004. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.094004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.9.094004 2024

  38. [40]

    H. Hao, X. Li, T. Liu, H. Tan, Enhanced profile-preserving phase-field model of two-phase flow with surfactant interfacial transport and marangoni effects, Journal of Computational Physics 536 (2025) 114058.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114058. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999125003419

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114058 2025

  39. [41]

    H. Hao, X. Li, L. Xu, T. Liu, H. Tan, Profile-preserving phase-field model for surfactant transport and adsorption- desorption in two-phase flow systems, Journal of Computational Physics 546 (2026) 114510.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114510. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999125007922

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2025.114510 2026

  40. [42]

    S. S. Jain, A model for transport of interface-confined scalars and insoluble surfactants in two-phase flows, Jour- nal of Computational Physics 515 (2024) 113277.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113277. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999124005254

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2024.113277 2024

  41. [43]

    Y . Hu, A diffuse interface–lattice boltzmann model for surfactant transport on an interface, Applied Mathematics Letters 111 (2021) 106614.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2020.106614. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893965920302998

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aml.2020.106614 2021

  42. [44]

    Yamashita, S

    S. Yamashita, S. Matsushita, T. Suekane, Conservative transport model for surfactant on the interface based on the phase-field method, Journal of Computational Physics 516 (2024) 113292.doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jcp.2024.113292. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999124005400

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [45]

    K. Yang, T. Aoki, Weakly compressible navier-stokes solver based on evolving pressure projection method for two-phase flow simulations, Journal of Computational Physics 431 (2021) 110113.doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110113. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002199912100005X

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110113 2021

  44. [46]

    Sussman, P

    M. Sussman, P. Smereka, S. Osher, A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow, Journal of Computational Physics 114 (1) (1994) 146–159.doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph. 1994.1155. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999184711557

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph 1994

  45. [47]

    M. S. Dodd, A. Ferrante, A fast pressure-correction method for incompressible two-fluid flows, Journal of Com- putational Physics 273 (2014) 416–434.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.05.024. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999114003702

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2014.05.024 2014

  46. [48]

    C.-W. Shu, S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, Journal of Computational Physics 77 (2) (1988) 439–471.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021999188901775 25

    work page doi:10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5 1988

  47. [49]

    Min, On reinitializing level set functions, Journal of Computational Physics 229 (8) (2010) 2764–2772

    C. Min, On reinitializing level set functions, Journal of Computational Physics 229 (8) (2010) 2764–2772. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.12.032. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999109007189

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2009.12.032 2010

  48. [50]

    C. Min, F. Gibou, A second order accurate level set method on non-graded adaptive cartesian grids, Journal of Computational Physics 225 (1) (2007) 300–321.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2006.11.034. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999106005912

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2006.11.034 2007

  49. [51]

    Jiang, D

    G.-S. Jiang, D. Peng, Weighted eno schemes for hamilton–jacobi equations, SIAM Journal on Scientific Com- puting 21 (6) (2000) 2126–2143.arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1137/S106482759732455X,doi:10.1137/ S106482759732455X. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1137/S106482759732455X

    work page doi:10.1137/s106482759732455x 2000

  50. [52]

    Ahrens, B

    J. AHRENS, B. GEVECI, C. LAW, 36 - paraview: An end-user tool for large-data visualization, in: C. D. Hansen, C. R. Johnson (Eds.), Visualization Handbook, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, 2005, pp. 717– 731.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012387582-2/50038-1. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123875822500381

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-012387582-2/50038-1 2005

  51. [53]

    W. J. Rider, D. B. Kothe, Reconstructing volume tracking, Journal of Computational Physics 141 (2) (1998) 112–152.doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1998.5906. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002199919895906X

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph.1998.5906 1998

  52. [54]

    R. J. LeVeque, High-resolution conservative algorithms for advection in incompressible flow, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 33 (2) (1996) 627–665.arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1137/0733033,doi:10.1137/ 0733033. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1137/0733033

    work page doi:10.1137/0733033 1996

  53. [55]

    A continuum method for modeling surface tension , journal =

    J. Brackbill, D. Kothe, C. Zemach, A continuum method for modeling surface tension, Journal of Computational Physics 100 (2) (1992) 335–354.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(92)90240-Y. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002199919290240Y 26

    work page doi:10.1016/0021-9991(92)90240-y 1992