Integral Transformations for Conformally Invariant Celestial Amplitudes
Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 13:37 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
New coordinates enforce conformal invariance in celestial gluon amplitudes
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We propose an integral transformation for celestial gluon amplitudes that maps the celestial coordinates (z_i, bar z_i) to a new set of complex variables (s_i, bar s_i), inspired by the structure of closed string scattering amplitudes. A consistent inverse transformation is constructed by regulating a divergence associated with translational redundancy and absorbing it into an overall normalization. Applying this transformation to celestial MHV amplitudes, we derive constraints on (s_i, bar s_i) for three-, four-, and general n-point amplitudes, and show that these conditions are necessary for invariance under global conformal transformations.
What carries the argument
The integral transformation mapping celestial coordinates (z_i, bar z_i) to new variables (s_i, bar s_i) that encodes the conditions for conformal invariance.
If this is right
- Constraints on (s_i, bar s_i) are obtained for three-point celestial MHV amplitudes.
- Four-point amplitudes yield analogous constraints on the new variables.
- General n-point amplitudes follow the same pattern with corresponding conditions.
- The derived conditions are required for the amplitudes to be invariant under global conformal transformations.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- If the transformation can be extended beyond MHV amplitudes, it may reveal similar invariance conditions for more general cases.
- The regulation technique for the divergence could apply to other symmetries in amplitude computations.
- This mapping might facilitate direct comparisons between celestial amplitudes and string theory results.
Load-bearing premise
The divergence associated with translational redundancy can be regulated in a manner that is absorbed into an overall normalization without altering the physical content or conformal properties of the transformed amplitudes.
What would settle it
Computing the conformally transformed version of a constrained four-point amplitude in the new variables and finding a mismatch in its value would falsify the necessity of the constraints.
Figures
read the original abstract
We propose an integral transformation for celestial gluon amplitudes that maps the celestial coordinates \((z_i,\bar z_i)\) to a new set of complex variables \((s_i,\bar s_i)\), inspired by the structure of closed string scattering amplitudes. A consistent inverse transformation is constructed by regulating a divergence associated with translational redundancy and absorbing it into an overall normalization. Applying this transformation to celestial MHV amplitudes, we derive constraints on \((s_i,\bar s_i)\) for three-, four-, and general \(n\)-point amplitudes, and show that these conditions are necessary for invariance under global conformal transformations.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript proposes an integral transformation for celestial gluon amplitudes mapping celestial coordinates (z_i, bar z_i) to new complex variables (s_i, bar s_i), inspired by closed string scattering amplitudes. A consistent inverse transformation is constructed by regulating the divergence from translational redundancy and absorbing it into an overall normalization. The transformation is applied to celestial MHV amplitudes to derive constraints on (s_i, bar s_i) for three-, four-, and general n-point amplitudes, with these conditions shown to be necessary for invariance under global conformal transformations.
Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, this work would introduce a new coordinate system for celestial amplitudes with potential connections to string theory structures, offering a framework to derive and verify conformal invariance constraints explicitly for MHV cases. The handling of the inverse via regulation addresses a technical obstacle in such mappings and could facilitate further studies of conformally invariant celestial holography.
major comments (2)
- [inverse transformation construction] The construction of the inverse transformation (described in the paragraph on inverse transformation construction) asserts that regulating the translational redundancy divergence and absorbing it into an overall normalization leaves the physical content and conformal properties unaltered. However, no explicit check is provided that this normalization factor is independent of the (z_i, bar z_i) coordinates in a manner that commutes with the SL(2,C) action; if coordinate dependence remains, the necessity of the derived constraints for the original amplitudes would not follow.
- [application to MHV amplitudes] In the application to celestial MHV amplitudes (section deriving constraints for three-, four-, and n-point cases), the necessity of the (s_i, bar s_i) constraints for global conformal invariance is claimed, but the derivation steps for the general n-point case lack sufficient detail on how the integral transformation interacts with the MHV structure to enforce these conditions without additional assumptions.
minor comments (2)
- [introduction] The abstract and introduction could benefit from a brief comparison to prior integral transformations or coordinate changes in celestial amplitude literature to better situate the novelty.
- Notation for the regulated divergence and the normalization factor should be introduced with an equation number for clarity in subsequent sections.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment in turn below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [inverse transformation construction] The construction of the inverse transformation (described in the paragraph on inverse transformation construction) asserts that regulating the translational redundancy divergence and absorbing it into an overall normalization leaves the physical content and conformal properties unaltered. However, no explicit check is provided that this normalization factor is independent of the (z_i, bar z_i) coordinates in a manner that commutes with the SL(2,C) action; if coordinate dependence remains, the necessity of the derived constraints for the original amplitudes would not follow.
Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The normalization factor obtained after regulating the translational redundancy is independent of the celestial coordinates (z_i, bar z_i), since the divergence arises uniformly from the overall translational invariance of the amplitude and is removed by a coordinate-independent regulator. Consequently, the factor commutes with the SL(2,C) action. To make this explicit, we will add a short calculation in the revised manuscript demonstrating the coordinate independence and its compatibility with the conformal transformations. revision: yes
-
Referee: [application to MHV amplitudes] In the application to celestial MHV amplitudes (section deriving constraints for three-, four-, and n-point cases), the necessity of the (s_i, bar s_i) constraints for global conformal invariance is claimed, but the derivation steps for the general n-point case lack sufficient detail on how the integral transformation interacts with the MHV structure to enforce these conditions without additional assumptions.
Authors: We agree that the general n-point derivation can be presented with greater detail. The MHV amplitudes have a holomorphic structure consisting of products of differences (z_i - z_j). After the integral transformation, the requirement that the resulting expression in the (s_i, bar s_i) variables remains invariant under global SL(2,C) transformations directly imposes the stated constraints; no additional assumptions beyond the known MHV form and the definition of the integral map are used. We will expand the relevant section with intermediate steps showing how the transformation acts on the MHV factors to produce the constraints for arbitrary n. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: explicit construction and application yield independent constraints
full rationale
The paper introduces a novel integral transformation mapping celestial coordinates (z_i, bar z_i) to (s_i, bar s_i), inspired by closed string amplitudes. It constructs the inverse explicitly by regulating translational divergence and absorbing it into normalization, then applies the map to celestial MHV amplitudes to derive constraints on (s_i, bar s_i) for n-point cases. These constraints are shown necessary for global conformal invariance via the transformed expressions. No step reduces by definition to its own output, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation or ansatz smuggling occurs. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the stated construction and explicit application to MHV data.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Standard properties of celestial amplitudes and global conformal transformations on the celestial sphere hold.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We propose an integral transformation ... maps ... (z_i,¯z_i) to ... (s_i,¯s_i) ... derive constraints on (s_i,¯s_i) ... necessary for invariance under global conformal transformations.
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
regulating a divergence associated with translational redundancy and absorbing it into an overall normalization
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Grav- ity and Gauge Theory
A. Strominger,Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Grav- ity and Gauge Theory. Princeton University Press, 2018
work page 2018
-
[2]
Lectures on celestial holography,
A.-M. Raclariu, “Lectures on celestial holography,” 2021
work page 2021
-
[3]
A Holographic reduc- tion of Minkowski space-time,
J. de Boer and S. N. Solodukhin, “A Holographic reduc- tion of Minkowski space-time,”Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 665, pp. 545–593, 2003. 7
work page 2003
-
[4]
Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere,
S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao, and A. Strominger, “Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 96, no. 6, p. 065026, 2017
work page 2017
-
[5]
Gluon Am- plitudes as 2d Conformal Correlators,
S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao, and A. Strominger, “Gluon Am- plitudes as 2d Conformal Correlators,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 96, no. 8, p. 085006, 2017
work page 2017
-
[6]
Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes,
S. Pasterski and S.-H. Shao, “Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 96, no. 6, p. 065022, 2017
work page 2017
-
[7]
On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,
A. Strominger, “On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,”JHEP, vol. 07, p. 152, 2014
work page 2014
-
[8]
Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory,
A. Strominger, “Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory,”JHEP, vol. 07, p. 151, 2014
work page 2014
-
[9]
Tree- level gluon amplitudes on the celestial sphere,
A. ø. Schreiber, A. V olovich, and M. Zlotnikov, “Tree- level gluon amplitudes on the celestial sphere,”Physics Letters B, vol. 781, pp. 349–357, 2018
work page 2018
-
[10]
S. Stieberger and T. R. Taylor, “Strings on Celestial Sphere,”Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 935, pp. 388–411, 2018
work page 2018
-
[11]
Celestial open strings at one-loop,
L. Donnay, G. Giribet, H. González, A. Puhm, and F. Ro- jas, “Celestial open strings at one-loop,”JHEP, vol. 10, p. 047, 2023
work page 2023
-
[12]
Celestial closed strings at one loop,
A. F. Canazas Garay, G. Giribet, Y . Parra-Cisterna, and F. Rojas, “Celestial closed strings at one loop,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 111, no. 12, p. 126014, 2025
work page 2025
-
[13]
Double Copy for Celestial Am- plitudes,
E. Casali and A. Puhm, “Double Copy for Celestial Am- plitudes,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, no. 10, p. 101602, 2021
work page 2021
-
[14]
Eikonal am- plitudes on the celestial sphere,
T. Adamo, W. Bu, P. Tourkine, and B. Zhu, “Eikonal am- plitudes on the celestial sphere,”JHEP, vol. 10, p. 192, 2024
work page 2024
-
[15]
A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings,
H. Kawai, D. C. Lewellen, and S. H. H. Tye, “A Relation Between Tree Amplitudes of Closed and Open Strings,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 269, pp. 1–23, 1986
work page 1986
-
[16]
Perturbative quantum gravity and its relation to gauge theory,
Z. Bern, “Perturbative quantum gravity and its relation to gauge theory,”Living Rev. Rel., vol. 5, p. 5, 2002
work page 2002
-
[17]
New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,
Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, and H. Johansson, “New Relations for Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 78, p. 085011, 2008
work page 2008
-
[18]
Perturba- tive Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge The- ory,
Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, and H. Johansson, “Perturba- tive Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge The- ory,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 105, p. 061602, 2010
work page 2010
-
[19]
Gravity as the Square of Gauge Theory,
Z. Bern, T. Dennen, Y .-t. Huang, and M. Kiermaier, “Gravity as the Square of Gauge Theory,”Phys. Rev. D, vol. 82, p. 065003, 2010
work page 2010
-
[20]
Minimal basis for gauge theory amplitudes,
N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, and P. Vanhove, “Minimal basis for gauge theory amplitudes,”Physical re- view letters, vol. 103, no. 16, p. 161602, 2009
work page 2009
-
[21]
Open & Closed vs. Pure Open String Disk Amplitudes,
S. Stieberger, “Open & Closed vs. Pure Open String Disk Amplitudes,” 7 2009
work page 2009
-
[22]
Disk Scattering of Open and Closed Strings (I),
S. Stieberger and T. R. Taylor, “Disk Scattering of Open and Closed Strings (I),”Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 903, pp. 104– 117, 2016
work page 2016
-
[23]
Relations be- tween closed string amplitudes and mixed string ampli- tudes at tree-level,
A. Yuenyong and P. Srisangyingcharoen, “Relations be- tween closed string amplitudes and mixed string ampli- tudes at tree-level,”JHEP, vol. 08, p. 097, 2024
work page 2024
-
[24]
On-shell Recursion in String Theory,
R. H. Boels, D. Marmiroli, and N. A. Obers, “On-shell Recursion in String Theory,”JHEP, vol. 10, p. 034, 2010
work page 2010
-
[25]
A note on on-shell recursion relation of string amplitudes,
Y .-Y . Chang, B. Feng, C.-H. Fu, J.-C. Lee, Y . Wang, and Y . Yang, “A note on on-shell recursion relation of string amplitudes,”JHEP, vol. 02, p. 028, 2013
work page 2013
-
[26]
General expressions for on-shell recursion relations for tree-level open string amplitudes,
P. Srisangyingcharoen, “General expressions for on-shell recursion relations for tree-level open string amplitudes,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 858, p. 139038, 2024
work page 2024
-
[27]
On-shell recur- sion relations for tree-level closed string amplitudes,
P. Srisangyingcharoen and A. Yuenyong, “On-shell recur- sion relations for tree-level closed string amplitudes,”Eur . Phys. J. C, vol. 85, no. 10, p. 1118, 2025
work page 2025
-
[28]
An Amplitude fornGluon Scattering,
S. J. Parke and T. R. Taylor, “An Amplitude fornGluon Scattering,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 56, p. 2459, 1986
work page 1986
-
[29]
M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten,Superstring Theory: 25th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge Mono- graphs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, 2012
work page 2012
-
[30]
A geometric approach to determinants,
J. Hannah, “A geometric approach to determinants,” The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 401–409, 1996
work page 1996
-
[31]
Soft Limits of Yang-Mills Amplitudes and Conformal Correlators,
W. Fan, A. Fotopoulos, and T. R. Taylor, “Soft Limits of Yang-Mills Amplitudes and Conformal Correlators,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 121, 2019
work page 2019
-
[32]
A re- view of definitions for fractional derivatives and integral,
E. C. de Oliveira and J. A. Tenreiro Machado, “A re- view of definitions for fractional derivatives and integral,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, no. 1, p. 238459, 2014
work page 2014
-
[33]
K. Miller and B. Ross,An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations. Wiley, 1993. 8
work page 1993
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.